Not completely, the whole universe has a unique principle, may it be math and its origins all that. Religion, especially Christianity is the cement of civilization, others are the opposite (Islam/Judaism)
Science is not religion. Science is understanding the universe, and the more we dig, the more we understand there is a principle more complex than the simple definition of God.
Atheists don't understand a shit about science and consider science their religion, while science is about permanently questioning and no affirmation that is sealed, especially about the fundamental question on the origin of the universe.
All scientists, all the major mathematicians always been deeply theist. What atheists sure prove is that science attacks religions, but not the God, but want science to be settled, despite it keeps bringing more and more questions as deep you're searching.
As an example, evolution. An atheist will tell you «Science says we evolved from monkeys»
Science never affirms this, but this is what atheists believe. We just have a common ancestor with monkeys, we have a common ancestor with ponies, cats, dogs, dolphins, who have a common ancestor in primitive mammals, who have in common dinosaurs and reptilians, and so on.
«But science says...» Please read Darwin and Buffon, biology does not works that way.
New age bullshit also claims using science extraterrestrials helped build pyramids or have been used with Area 51 or are visiting us, that aliens are the proof we are not alone, get rekt religion! Except there is not a single scientific proof there is life anywhere else or detected so far. Not a single proof. Atheists are like the muslims reading their Quran, they are morons who repeat what they read not understanding what they read.
Numerology and coincidence are a false path, it's not math, we invented numbers and math and we will find sequences and patterns everywhere, a lot of coincidences but that's because our numeral systems are limited, math is more exact as there are principles and constants that are common to our universe. But jumping to conclusions and omitting the fact there are randomness that we will think being too much of a coincidence is a trap we must avoid falling into.
Aurélien Barrau made the same mistake recently trying to bring a theory about dark matter, as it would be caused by primordial blackholes. He got rekt. Because there was a coincidence in the results.
Climate science also falls on this trap because there are collusions with human activity and climate change, this is as valid as astrology or numerology, it's not the scientific method, at all, and this is alarming.
However Pi is about a jew getting trolled into religion, derivating from critical thinking and science trying to find a meaning that can be also explain the torah, rabbis and their manipulation, and a secret formula, finding patterns as an obsession... no spoilers, but it's an excellent exemple about kikery, finance and all that shit, well, I recommand it.