/cyb/ - Cyberpunk Fiction and Fact

These aren't the best, but it's still impressive. Is there is anything good left in this world, it will be the advent and proliferation of ultra hd, hyper realistic pony pussy.
>>1921
Fucking amazing except for the stumpy leg.

>>1923
The SULTRY GAZES on those Foxes!

>>1582
I used to think it was unethical to prioritize profit in anything that was some kind of art-derivative.
But I think am absolutely okay with micro transactions at this point. Everything I can do or get away with to rape the whales is fair game.
Why should I care when everyone will dispose of me and my work the moment a decent AI comes around?

Funny how AI-art is so close to match Human art.
But there's still not a fucking burger-flipping machine. I hope machine learning fucks manual labour next.

>>1929
>I hope machine learning fucks manual labour next.
It's been fucking the working class for decades and now it's finally getting around to you worthless faggots. You mocked us, called us inferior, and constantly derided us. "Dey took ur jerbz," you'd mockingly post as our livelihoods and communities were destroyed. You deserve worse than this.
Kill yourself, faggot.

>>1582
I am a customer, so I welcome that.

>>1930
>It's been fucking the working class for decades
Not nearly as much as it should've, for the greater good I mean.
Don't agree? Show me the burger-flippator machine or stfu.
>called us inferior
Kek.
Sorry if I don't consider a brick-layer, menial fucktard as a prime example of the greatest qualities of mankind.
>our communities
Spoken like a third world shitskin.
>You deserve worse than this.
>You
Not even a drawfag.

>>1932
Dilate

>>1932
>as it should've
Wtf? Why is fucking the working class a good thing?
>Show me the burger-flippator machine
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KJVOfqunm5E

>First one to take the bait.
They're just not built the same.

>>1937
Not widespread enough, brainlet.

>>1940
You didn't say widespread. There are other examples of widespread automation.
Anyway, there's a clear trend in automation gradually and rapidly replacing jobs in all sectors. It has screwed the working class as jobs are eliminated faster than the economy can grow to replace them. It's not necessarily a bad thing that technology has been replacing those jobs, but to say it's a 'good' thing ignores some very real societal consequences of entire sectors of people being put out of work.
I personally welcome technology replacing the need for manual labor, in both industry and art, but I think people should think ahead about the long term consequences of jobs disappearing, so that we as a society can prepare to re-employ those people with new jobs created by technology.

>>1945
I still think it's fundamentally worse when Art is the target. Forget about employment. If a law somehow managed to end Art as a commodity it wouldn't even matter to me. I've considered Art as the soul and heart of what means to be human for a long time.
How many times have people said corny shit like.
<"Sure, machines are better than humans at a lot of things. But can a machine turn a blank canvas into a masterpiece."

No disrespect for manual labor, a lot of that is also a form of Art in a way. Uncle Adolf said there must be respect between those who work with their mind, and those who work with their body.
The fact AI or machine learning can eventually master every form of human Art might as well be the end of mankind for me. I think many people just forget that AI digital Art, was once as shit as AI writing currently is.
There is nothing that can be done about that. Technology gives and takes. It already killed the mystery behind chess and further diminished the role of creativity.

>>1950
Does AI art really do anything to diminish actual art though? It's not zero sum.
Also, it's worth mentioning that it takes a not-insignificant amount of creativity and persistence to make these images. On top of coming up with a prompt, you have to refresh the program hundreds of times over the course of hours to get satisfying images. That is an expression of the individual, even if it's generated by a machine.
I believe that AI art will usher in a new era of creativity and content/shitposting, where individuals are no longer limited by their personal skill at drawing.
>It already killed the mystery behind chess
Oh yeah. Big RIP for chess players. Even low-power programs are basically unbeatable at this point. It's like trying to arm wrestle the Terminator.

>>1950
>The fact AI or machine learning can eventually master every form of human Art might as well be the end of mankind for me.
Why does it matter though? We live in a nightmarish, dystopian hellhole that's only going to get significantly worse before it might even have a chance of getting better. Who cares?
Also, the human "spirit" isn't going anywhere when it comes to art and artistic expression. People will always find a way to make art in one way or another and AI has no effect on that. Do you really care if the shitty corporate calarts diversity portraits are made by AI?
The reaction to AI art reminds me of when buzzfeed journos were laid off and got told to "learn to code". Poetic justice.

>>1951
>On top of coming up with a prompt
>I believe that AI art will usher in a new era of creativity and content/shitposting, where individuals are no longer limited by their personal skill at drawing.
I apologize for being unnecessarily rude earlier. But, fuck...
Here we go again, over and over again. Do you seriously can't fucking grasp that AI art will most likely NOT be limited to digital drawing? It's like you didn't even read the fucking post.

>>1952
>Also, the human "spirit" isn't going anywhere when it comes to art and artistic expression. People will always find a way to make art in one way or another and AI has no effect on that.
It was perhaps the greatest stronghold of man against the machine. The one thing that was meant to set us apart. Sure you can still play chess...I don't even thing you get it. That or you're not arguing in good faith.
>The reaction to AI art reminds me of when buzzfeed journos were laid off and got told to "learn to code". Poetic justice.
Well I don't think journalism is a great example of the "human spirit", specially the kind of journalism we are talking about.

>>1960
>AI art will most likely NOT be limited to digital drawing?
What's wrong with that? It's more content creation. It's not going prevent people from making their own art without it. It'll just enable people to generate content very quickly. It still requires human input to get ideas in the first place.

>>1961
>It still requires human input to get ideas in the first place.
Bait or sheer retardation. That is kind of the gamble one has to make these days.

>>1962
It hasn't gotten to the point of generating completely original ideas that fulfill needs that people didn't even know they had.

>>1961
Am gonna try one more time just because people seem to be helplessly clueless everywhere I go, and thus I'm inclined to believe you are being serious.
Picture the following.
AI unironically starts writing novels better than anything man can conjure.
As I implied here >>1950
>I think many people just forget that AI digital Art, was once as shit as AI writing currently is.

Do you seriously thing a prompt is hot shit for that kind of AI?
>It hasn't gotten to the point...
<YET

>>1964
>AI unironically starts writing novels better than anything man can conjure.
Okay, but what's so bad about this? Sounds like it could be really productive.

Yeah, I figured it was bait. Great venting in the end, have a nice day lads.

Have a Fluttershy

>>1968
Thanks Karen, pretty cool.

>>1969
Based Karen

>>1960
>It was perhaps the greatest stronghold of man against the machine.
Machines are made by people and I'd consider them an extension of humanity in a way. There is no man vs dichotomy as far as I'm concerned. One should aspire to harness the glory of a big block V8 powering a computer that generates ultra realistic images of pony pussy while running over niggers.
>I don't even thing you get it. That or you're not arguing in good faith.
Reevaluate.

>>1971
>Reevaluate
You don't. Consider yourself victorious either way. It doesn't even matter.

So many cute poners

>>1972
Cheer up. Try considering the pros of AI advancing. Imagine no longer being beholden to artists to get your fix of mares.

>>1987
Based Veggie Tales right once again.

>>1985
>>1987
I should make the first randomly generated fire emblem game.
the music? AI generated. the plot? AI generated. every character? every level? AI generated. Fuck trying to write anything important with deep themes. I should start with the default template people expect from FE and then fill it with AI generated content.

>>2013
Fuck you.

.

.