/cyb/ - Cyberpunk Fiction and Fact

Cyberpunk is the idea that technology will condemn us to a future of totalitarian nightmares here you can discuss recent events and how technology has been used to facilitate greater control by the elites, or works of fiction


If you want to see the latest posts from all boards in a convenient way please check out /overboard/

Name
Email
Subject
By clicking New Reply, I acknowledge the existence of the Israeli nuclear arsenal.
Comment
0
Select File / Oekaki
File(s)
Password (For file and/or post deletion.)

1662226575.jpg
AI Generated Images
Anonymous
No.1545
1551
Thought an art thread for AI generated images would be fun. There is a few different AIs now and they are really good.
252 replies and 230 files omitted.
Anonymous
No.1924
Screenshot_20221012-085624-059.png

Anonymous
No.1926
04059cbfd980bcca2d696f6724f3b752b68b308e2268c308c1acbc947fd930e5_1.jpg.jpg

Anonymous
No.1927
>>1923
The SULTRY GAZES on those Foxes!
Anonymous
No.1928
unknown-111.png

Anonymous
No.1929
1930
>>1582
I used to think it was unethical to prioritize profit in anything that was some kind of art-derivative.
But I think am absolutely okay with micro transactions at this point. Everything I can do or get away with to rape the whales is fair game.
Why should I care when everyone will dispose of me and my work the moment a decent AI comes around?

Funny how AI-art is so close to match Human art.
But there's still not a fucking burger-flipping machine. I hope machine learning fucks manual labour next.
Anonymous
No.1930
1932
>>1929
>I hope machine learning fucks manual labour next.
It's been fucking the working class for decades and now it's finally getting around to you worthless faggots. You mocked us, called us inferior, and constantly derided us. "Dey took ur jerbz," you'd mockingly post as our livelihoods and communities were destroyed. You deserve worse than this.
Kill yourself, faggot.
Anonymous
No.1931
>>1582
I am a customer, so I welcome that.
Anonymous
No.1932
1936 1937
>>1930
>It's been fucking the working class for decades
Not nearly as much as it should've, for the greater good I mean.
Don't agree? Show me the burger-flippator machine or stfu.
>called us inferior
Kek.
Sorry if I don't consider a brick-layer, menial fucktard as a prime example of the greatest qualities of mankind.
>our communities
Spoken like a third world shitskin.
>You deserve worse than this.
>You
Not even a drawfag.
Anonymous
No.1933
unknown-46.png

Anonymous
No.1936
>>1932
Dilate
Anonymous
No.1937
1940
>>1932
>as it should've
Wtf? Why is fucking the working class a good thing?
>Show me the burger-flippator machine
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KJVOfqunm5E
Anonymous
No.1939
>First one to take the bait.
They're just not built the same.
Anonymous
No.1940
1945
>>1937
Not widespread enough, brainlet.
Anonymous
No.1945
1950
>>1940
You didn't say widespread. There are other examples of widespread automation.
Anyway, there's a clear trend in automation gradually and rapidly replacing jobs in all sectors. It has screwed the working class as jobs are eliminated faster than the economy can grow to replace them. It's not necessarily a bad thing that technology has been replacing those jobs, but to say it's a 'good' thing ignores some very real societal consequences of entire sectors of people being put out of work.
I personally welcome technology replacing the need for manual labor, in both industry and art, but I think people should think ahead about the long term consequences of jobs disappearing, so that we as a society can prepare to re-employ those people with new jobs created by technology.
Anonymous
No.1950
1951 1952 1964
1556870656867.gif
>>1945
I still think it's fundamentally worse when Art is the target. Forget about employment. If a law somehow managed to end Art as a commodity it wouldn't even matter to me. I've considered Art as the soul and heart of what means to be human for a long time.
How many times have people said corny shit like.
<"Sure, machines are better than humans at a lot of things. But can a machine turn a blank canvas into a masterpiece."

No disrespect for manual labor, a lot of that is also a form of Art in a way. Uncle Adolf said there must be respect between those who work with their mind, and those who work with their body.
The fact AI or machine learning can eventually master every form of human Art might as well be the end of mankind for me. I think many people just forget that AI digital Art, was once as shit as AI writing currently is.
There is nothing that can be done about that. Technology gives and takes. It already killed the mystery behind chess and further diminished the role of creativity.
Anonymous
No.1951
1960
>>1950
Does AI art really do anything to diminish actual art though? It's not zero sum.
Also, it's worth mentioning that it takes a not-insignificant amount of creativity and persistence to make these images. On top of coming up with a prompt, you have to refresh the program hundreds of times over the course of hours to get satisfying images. That is an expression of the individual, even if it's generated by a machine.
I believe that AI art will usher in a new era of creativity and content/shitposting, where individuals are no longer limited by their personal skill at drawing.
>It already killed the mystery behind chess
Oh yeah. Big RIP for chess players. Even low-power programs are basically unbeatable at this point. It's like trying to arm wrestle the Terminator.
Anonymous
No.1952
1960
>>1950
>The fact AI or machine learning can eventually master every form of human Art might as well be the end of mankind for me.
Why does it matter though? We live in a nightmarish, dystopian hellhole that's only going to get significantly worse before it might even have a chance of getting better. Who cares?
Also, the human "spirit" isn't going anywhere when it comes to art and artistic expression. People will always find a way to make art in one way or another and AI has no effect on that. Do you really care if the shitty corporate calarts diversity portraits are made by AI?
The reaction to AI art reminds me of when buzzfeed journos were laid off and got told to "learn to code". Poetic justice.
Anonymous
No.1960
1961 1971
>>1951
>On top of coming up with a prompt
>I believe that AI art will usher in a new era of creativity and content/shitposting, where individuals are no longer limited by their personal skill at drawing.
I apologize for being unnecessarily rude earlier. But, fuck...
Here we go again, over and over again. Do you seriously can't fucking grasp that AI art will most likely NOT be limited to digital drawing? It's like you didn't even read the fucking post.

>>1952
>Also, the human "spirit" isn't going anywhere when it comes to art and artistic expression. People will always find a way to make art in one way or another and AI has no effect on that.
It was perhaps the greatest stronghold of man against the machine. The one thing that was meant to set us apart. Sure you can still play chess...I don't even thing you get it. That or you're not arguing in good faith.
>The reaction to AI art reminds me of when buzzfeed journos were laid off and got told to "learn to code". Poetic justice.
Well I don't think journalism is a great example of the "human spirit", specially the kind of journalism we are talking about.
Anonymous
No.1961
1962 1964
>>1960
>AI art will most likely NOT be limited to digital drawing?
What's wrong with that? It's more content creation. It's not going prevent people from making their own art without it. It'll just enable people to generate content very quickly. It still requires human input to get ideas in the first place.
Anonymous
No.1962
1963
>>1961
>It still requires human input to get ideas in the first place.
Bait or sheer retardation. That is kind of the gamble one has to make these days.
Anonymous
No.1963
>>1962
It hasn't gotten to the point of generating completely original ideas that fulfill needs that people didn't even know they had.
Anonymous
No.1964
1966
>>1961
Am gonna try one more time just because people seem to be helplessly clueless everywhere I go, and thus I'm inclined to believe you are being serious.
Picture the following.
AI unironically starts writing novels better than anything man can conjure.
As I implied here >>1950
>I think many people just forget that AI digital Art, was once as shit as AI writing currently is.

Do you seriously thing a prompt is hot shit for that kind of AI?
>It hasn't gotten to the point...
<YET
Anonymous
No.1966
>>1964
>AI unironically starts writing novels better than anything man can conjure.
Okay, but what's so bad about this? Sounds like it could be really productive.
Anonymous
No.1967
Yeah, I figured it was bait. Great venting in the end, have a nice day lads.
Anonymous
No.1968
1969
unknown (2).png
Have a Fluttershy
Anonymous
No.1969
1970
77a7b0c42e547fd2ec093fc913a66f2d.jpg
>>1968
Thanks Karen, pretty cool.
Anonymous
No.1970
>>1969
Based Karen
Anonymous
No.1971
1972
>>1960
>It was perhaps the greatest stronghold of man against the machine.
Machines are made by people and I'd consider them an extension of humanity in a way. There is no man vs dichotomy as far as I'm concerned. One should aspire to harness the glory of a big block V8 powering a computer that generates ultra realistic images of pony pussy while running over niggers.
>I don't even thing you get it. That or you're not arguing in good faith.
Reevaluate.
Anonymous
No.1972
1974
>>1971
>Reevaluate
You don't. Consider yourself victorious either way. It doesn't even matter.
Anonymous
No.1973
Screenshot_20221014-233737.png
Screenshot_20221014-233751.png
Screenshot_20221014-233811.png
Screenshot_20221014-233825.png
Screenshot_20221014-233857.png
So many cute poners
Anonymous
No.1974
1720895.png
>>1972
Cheer up. Try considering the pros of AI advancing. Imagine no longer being beholden to artists to get your fix of mares.
Anonymous
No.1977
1980
unknown (7).png

Anonymous
No.1980
$_1.jpeg
>>1977
>Card Trooper
Anonymous
No.1981
1991
FfEzeBFWYAQiiq5.jpg
FfEzeLMXgAAwYoR.jpeg
FfEzeUCXkAAKwJd.jpeg
FfEzeb3WYAITPZw.jpeg
https://twitter.com/AGM119Penguin/status/1581101544447279105
Anonymous
No.1985
1989
unknown (58).png

Anonymous
No.1987
1988 1989
File (hide): A880C874DE4B2DF0E5DC2E3CC37C7D6F-1106619.mp4 (1.1 MB, Resolution:640x640 Length:00:00:18, randomly_generated.mp4) [play once] [loop]
randomly_generated.mp4

Anonymous
No.1988
>>1987
Based Veggie Tales right once again.
Anonymous
No.1989
image.png
>>1985
>>1987
I should make the first randomly generated fire emblem game.
the music? AI generated. the plot? AI generated. every character? every level? AI generated. Fuck trying to write anything important with deep themes. I should start with the default template people expect from FE and then fill it with AI generated content.
Anonymous
No.1991
unknown_4.png
>>1981
Anonymous
No.1992
unknown (72).png

Anonymous
No.2009
unknown - 2022-10-21T151851.523.png

Anonymous
No.2013
2014
FB_IMG_1666357911679-1.jpg

Anonymous
No.2014
2015
>>2013
Fuck you.
Anonymous
No.2015
fetchimage (1).jpeg
>>2014
Anonymous
No.2017
2021 2023 2024
unknown - 2022-10-22T105506.375.png
unknown - 2022-10-22T105514.367.png
unknown - 2022-10-22T105520.550.png
unknown - 2022-10-22T105531.117.png
unknown - 2022-10-22T105541.887.png

Anonymous
No.2018
2021 2023 2024
unknown - 2022-10-22T105553.631.png
unknown - 2022-10-22T105605.946.png
unknown - 2022-10-22T105617.253.png
unknown - 2022-10-22T105629.235.png
unknown - 2022-10-22T105640.843.png
.
Anonymous
No.2019
2021 2023 2024
unknown - 2022-10-22T105652.598.png
unknown - 2022-10-22T105704.178.png
unknown - 2022-10-22T105715.035.png
unknown - 2022-10-22T105726.191.png
unknown - 2022-10-22T105738.815.png

Anonymous
No.2020
2021 2023 2024
unknown - 2022-10-22T105751.693.png
unknown - 2022-10-22T105805.616.png
unknown - 2022-10-22T105819.150.png
.
Anonymous
No.2021
2022
c536eb15790.jpg
>>2017
>>2018
>>2019
>>2020
I'm speechless.
Anonymous
No.2022
2023
>>2021
I see hundreds of pics of this quality on discord every day. I just only bothered dumping some now.
Anonymous
No.2023
>>2017
>>2018
>>2019
>>2020
Absolutely amazing!
>>2022
More, please!
Anonymous
No.2024
2026
>>2017
>>2018
>>2019
>>2020
Wow. They look great.
Do you know what model was used to create those images?
Anonymous
No.2025
Purplesmart AI has been improving:
https://discord.gg/4QDFxbRmjV
Anonymous
No.2026
2027 2033
>>2024
Program: automatic1111
Model: Astralites Ponyv1
Sampler: Euler a
Prompt: detailed fluffy fur, unicorn, (by taran fiddler and chunie , Michael & Inessa Garmash, Ruan Jia, Pino Daeni), volumetric lighting, ambient bloom, 4K, ((((solo)))), (((golden medieval full armor))), (golden full muzzle helmet with metal ears), (face covered), ((Fire for hair)), holy light
Anonymous
No.2027
2030
image.png
>>2026
Where can I get the Astralites Ponyv1 model?
I tried that prompt without the model and got this.
Anonymous
No.2030
2031 2033
1666466179.png
>>2027
Tested and loos like this is the model.
https://huggingface.co/AstraliteHeart/pony-diffusion
https://mega.nz/file/ZT1xEKgC#Xxir5udMmU_mKaRZAbBkF247Yk7DqCr01V0pDzSlYI0
Anonymous
No.2031
2032
>>2030
How does the model make art that good when most fandom art is show tracing- I mean vector art?
Anonymous
No.2032
1666466273.png
1666466214.png
1666466849.png
>>2031
I think that is one of the wonders of Neural Networks. No one knows exactly why it works so good as it does only that it works. But it is hit and misses in depending on seed number.
Anonymous
No.2033
>>2030
In case people want to know. For that image (that looked best so far and first I ran) used the Prompt by >>2026
>detailed fluffy fur, unicorn, (by taran fiddler and chunie , Michael & Inessa Garmash, Ruan Jia, Pino Daeni), volumetric lighting, ambient bloom, 4K, ((((solo)))), (((golden medieval full armor))), (golden full muzzle helmet with metal ears), (face covered), ((Fire for hair)), holy light
>Steps: 20, Sampler: Euler a, CFG scale: 7, Seed: 3081589709, Size: 512x512
Anonymous
No.2034
2035 2037
FfrjklaaYAAU-u3.png
FfrjlNpagAABKRF.png

Anonymous
No.2035
>>2034
I've heard of training girls, but this is ridiculous!
What is this, the next Kantai Collection spinoff?
Anonymous
No.2037
2038
>>2034
>trains and anime
Add ponies to the equation and we'd have enough autism to go to Mars and back.
Anonymous
No.2038
>>2037
And Sonic. Autists love Sonic for some reason.
Maybe they wish they were Sonic? Maybe Tails the shy small genius child who wants to be cool like Sonic appeals to them? Maybe they just like fast things.
Anonymous
No.2039
2040 2043 2045 2049
File (hide): 7E47DA1074E89A905316E927222B8E6F-44618012.mp4 (42.6 MB, Resolution:960x720 Length:00:03:32, 864865979-1-64.mp4) [play once] [loop]
864865979-1-64.mp4

Anonymous
No.2040
2041
>>2039
You deserve the Nobel peace prize!
Anonymous
No.2041
2042
>>2040
I didn't make it, but thanks.
Anonymous
No.2042
>>2041
Where's the source?
Anonymous
No.2043
>>2039
It's good, but it makes me dizzy.
Anonymous
No.2045
62blob.jpg
>>2039
>Rick Astley
Anonymous
No.2046
zai.jpeg

Anonymous
No.2049
2052
Ff13yoIVQAApCgo.jpeg
Ff132TmUYAAfddE.jpeg
Ff135xlUcAM_j46.png
>>2039
Videos like this are further proof that AI generated images doesn't "hurt art", but expands it. The concept of art is being democratized, so that even random people who have no talent for drawing or no time to paint can realize their creative ambitions and silly ideas.
It's said that beauty is in the eye of the beholder. A machine may be able to make immaculate images, but only a human can appreciate them. Likewise, only a human would have thought to use a machine to compile a bunch of anime girls into the Rick Rolled video, and AI helped them do it.
Anonymous
No.2052
2053 2054 2057
>>2049
Things only have value when they are scarce
Anonymous
No.2053
2055
>>2052
Art has always been abundant. There's trillions of artworks out there. The fact that unpracticed artists can create their own images with memes just adds to the sphere.
Art didn't suddenly get worse once acrylic paints enabled artists to buy their paint instead of mixing it from the elements.
Anonymous
No.2054
2055
>>2052
That's only for market value, which is irrelevant. Art's value is subjective.
Just look at the boorus and see how there's tens of thousands of lewd pics of the mane six, but people still get excited when new
Anonymous
No.2055
2056
>>2053
There aren't. Painting well is hard

>>2054
All value is subjective. That value is based on scarcity. If you have infinite art then all of it becomes boring

There's lots of pics but a tiny fraction of them actually appeal to you. If you can press a button to get a new one perfectly suited to you, you'll get bored of it

EVERYTHING becomes boring if you have an endless supply of it
Anonymous
No.2056
>>2055
>If you have infinite art then all of it becomes boring
I've seen thousands of conventional pony artworks and thousands of AI artworks in the past couple weeks alone, but I'm not bored at all.
>That value is based on scarcity.
I beg to differ. When it comes to art, the more the merrier.
>If you can press a button to get a new one perfectly suited to you, you'll get bored of it
If I became bored of it, it must have not suited me perfectly.
>EVERYTHING becomes boring if you have an endless supply of it
I already have a virtually endless supply of mare porn for free, and I'm not even close to bored of it yet.
Anonymous
No.2057
2058
>>2052
Things can have inherent value unrelated to their scarcity and how desired they are.
Incredibly rare randomly generated NFTs unlikely to exist don't have any intrinsic value granted by their rarity.
Anonymous
No.2058
>>2057
>Incredibly rare randomly generated NFTs unlikely to exist don't have any intrinsic value granted by their rarity.
This, regardless of how scarce something is, it's true value is based on one of two things:
1. How useful it is to people
2. It's subjective, sentimental value
AI art is useful, and also enables people to generate artworks that meet their own subjective tastes.
Anonymous
No.2059
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/p3j1neDF4UY
Anonymous
No.2060
unknown - 2022-10-25T183040.379.png

Anonymous
No.2061
2063
unknown - 2022-10-25T214532.612.png

Anonymous
No.2062
elf-large_breasts-nun-solo-looking_down.png

Anonymous
No.2063
>>2061
Amogüs
Anonymous
No.2064
2065
File (hide): 9B609F2FD5AE47F9D5BA7A516E85A808-12361010.mp4 (11.8 MB, Resolution:572x382 Length:00:03:47, bad_apple_except_ai_generated.mp4) [play once] [loop]
bad_apple_except_ai_generated.mp4

Anonymous
No.2065
>>2064
>A.I. generated
I doubt it. I believe A.I. assisted might be a more accurate term.
Anonymous
No.2066
2067 2068
unknown - 2022-10-26T101036.639.png

Anonymous
No.2067
>>2066
CUTE
Anonymous
No.2068
>>2066
Post steamy honeymoon pics pls
Also, checked devil dubs
Anonymous
No.2080
unknown - 2022-10-27T092309.707.png
unknown - 2022-10-27T092322.956.png
unknown - 2022-10-27T092334.932.png

Anonymous
No.2081
1666863789865904.png
1664515914349344.jpg

Anonymous
No.2084
1666549793954700.jpeg
1666549366590391.png
1666552073617527.jpeg

Anonymous
No.2115
2162
6536310.png
6533467.png
6544325.png
6544759.png
6542973.png

Anonymous
No.2120
2122
unknown - 2022-10-31T081336.846.png

Anonymous
No.2122
>>2120
Nice and hot.
Anonymous
No.2150
2151
1667055245469849.png

Anonymous
No.2151
>>2150
Pongle 2.0
Anonymous
No.2160
2162
Does anyone want a grid of 35-50 images made with your chosen prompt? My PC is pretty powerful.
Anonymous
No.2162
2163
>>2160
Ooooooo. I can try to think of something but from my testing crafting an effective promt is a science in itself so I am not sure what a good promt would be (my testing on my slow computer have not been too successful).
But if you can try to make some statues like in >>2115 (pic 3) it would be awesome. I think they look awesome.
Anonymous
No.2163
2164
image.png
image.png
>>2162
I'll need the prompt and model used for those pics. If I just said "(My Little Pony) garden statue" with the default model that came with the AI when I downloaded it I doubt I'll get good results, but I'll give it a go.

By the way, what does "Tiling" do? Whenever I check that box it just makes the output look inferior. Is there some purpose to it I'm missing?
Anonymous
No.2164
2166
1667504181.png
>>2163
The one I had limited success with (but takes 2-3 minutes per image so I was not able to do to much) was:
>pony statue, majestic, alicorn, 4k hi-res, detailed, granite, cracked surface, weathered
>Steps: 20, Sampler: Euler a, CFG scale: 7, Seed: 174254891, Size: 512x512
Anonymous
No.2166
2167
image.png
>>2164
2-3 minutes per image? That must suck. How many images can you generate at once before your PC runs out of memory?
One time I left my room with an autoclicker generating more sets of images every minute. By the time I got back, I had a few thousand.
Anonymous
No.2167
2168 2172 2348
>>2166
>How many images can you generate at once before your PC runs out of memory?
I can only run one at a time, and at times have to close other apps that uses memory in order for it to run.
Are you using the Stable Diffusion Model or Waifu model instead of the Pony model? The Pony Model is good and you should try it
https://huggingface.co/AstraliteHeart/pony-diffusion
https://mega.nz/file/ZT1xEKgC#Xxir5udMmU_mKaRZAbBkF247Yk7DqCr01V0pDzSlYI0
Anonymous
No.2168
2169
>>2167
Yep, that was the problem. It's turning out a lot better with the pony model.
Anonymous
No.2169
>>2168
Nice
Anonymous
No.2172
2173 2174
image.png
image.png
image.png
image.png
>>2167
Pony model loaded.
Here are some new AI generated pony statues, image sets 3 and 4 were made with the seed you posted instead of a random seed.
Had to split them up because trying to post the next 4 intact broke some kind of limit. "Request Entity too large".
Anonymous
No.2173
image.png
image.png
image.png
image.png
>>2172
Anonymous
No.2174
2176
>>2172
Strange that the first image in the set using same seed and prompt didn't yield the same image as I got as it should have done that. Subsequent images when given a seed should give previous_seed+1 when running batches.
Anonymous
No.2176
2177
>>2174
Maybe there's a second invisible seed somewhere. All the settings were accurately replicated.
Anonymous
No.2177
2178
>>2176
Strange. For reference the arguments I use to start Stable Diffusion is:
>--ckpt pony_sfw_80k_safe_and_suggestive_500rating_plus-pruned.ckpt --lowvram --opt-split-attention
Other than that I have the standard settings (no scripts or face fixes or anything) and standard txt2img
Anonymous
No.2178
2179
>>2177
>lowvram --opt-split-attention
I was using those exact settings except for that part. They just reduce the load on your computer and have no effect on the resulting image, right?
Anonymous
No.2179
2180 2182
>>2178
They should just reduce the memory used and not change what is produced. Just posted full list of arguments in case I'm wrong on that. It was just strange that you didn't get the same image using same prompt and seed.
Anonymous
No.2180
2181
>>2179
Was Restore Faces turned on?
Anonymous
No.2181
>>2180
No, none of the extra features are turned on on my end when I generated.
Anonymous
No.2182
2183 2184
>>2179
>It was just strange that you didn't get the same image using same prompt and seed.
You see, these AI's no longer "mash" images together with the hope of producing a coherent pic.
They basically emulate human creativity.
Artists need external inputs as well. They consciously and unconsciously absorb bits and pieces from every other artwork they may have seen before. Sometimes it may even be apparently unrelated life experiences.
Regardless, when artists draw inspiration from other art sources. They are pretty much doing the same thing that AI's do.
It's impossible to trace back the source pics. What AI's make is about as original as what any human could've conceived.

It makes sense you don't always get the same results, even when all things are equal.
Anonymous
No.2183
>>2182
>It makes sense you don't always get the same results, even when all things are equal.
Running same seed and prompt I get same image every time. Also running others prompt and seeds (I seen people post) I get same image they get when using the same model they used.
Anonymous
No.2184
>>2182
I don't think the AI is updating its own model with data from the pictures it generates.
I hope it isn't. I don't want my AI to give itself dementia by using its garbled output as new input.
By now its garbled output probably outnumbers the number of images it was trained on.
Anonymous
No.2190
File (hide): 98B73B6DC4597DD80406B7684DB73F93-5087586.mp4 (4.9 MB, Resolution:576x1024 Length:00:00:41, video_2022-11-07_12-36-29.mp4) [play once] [loop]
video_2022-11-07_12-36-29.mp4

Anonymous
No.2193
Does anyone have any good images? I tried doing a cursory search on ponerpics and the first few pages were horrid dogshit.
Anonymous
No.2194
2239
1668087378778.jpg

Anonymous
No.2234
2235 2236
1668610745262571.png
1668601053935131.jpg
1668600760080733.png
The era of abstract merchants has reached a new golden age.
Merchants are being produced faster than the ADL could ever hope to flag them.
Anonymous
No.2235
2237
>>2234
How do you make these?
I've got Stable Diffusion working, what's the secret?
Anonymous
No.2236
1668618534884038.png
>>2234
Anonymous
No.2237
>>2235
Idk. I got them from Discord.
If you find out any methods, do share. I want to mass produce merchants.
Anonymous
No.2238
1668421431477062.png
1667664885850159.png

pdiddy
!6Lim2MHjR2
No.2239
6a4.gif
>>2194
Anonymous
No.2241
2242
>>1884
That's not what I meant when I said I wanted racks on racks.
Anonymous
No.2242
>>2241
Racks on racks on racks on racks. Stacked rat stacks in hats on mats.
Anonymous
No.2245
00036-1416231330-green_eyes_s.png
00033-1191004003-green_eyes_s.png

Anonymous
No.2246
00050-4283156501-watercolor.png
00008-3025926800-safe_hioshir.png
00019-2923236971-t-hoodie_AND_.png
00002-3251689543-by_lumineko_A.png

Anonymous
No.2247
00021-4045882708-sky_safe_hi.png

Anonymous
No.2248
2249
unknown-117.png
image (60).png
Pixiv has lost its collective mind recently (more than before).
It's impossible to use the site without being recommended pics of [i]pregnant toddlers!
Anonymous
No.2249
>>2248
Oh fuck. Don't some models use data taken from pixiv or anime booru sites?
Anonymous
No.2250
2251
00006-3575903362.png

Anonymous
No.2251
>>2250
>you will never haiy her lcat or her spry aliet hany
Why live?
Anonymous
No.2252
6547190.png

Anonymous
No.2258
Twilight Sparkle supposedly.png
I got the new Everything V3 model.
It seems more varied than the previous smaller Waifu model I was using.
But it also loves to wash out the colours of anything I make with it. So I often have to saturate this desaturated art output until it looks right.
Anonymous
No.2273
2274
image.png
"Twilight Sparkle"
Anonymous
No.2274
2277
>>2273
Nice. Not knowing prompt but adding "(unicorn)" to prompt and "(text), devil" to negative prompt might fix some of the devil horns and and text. Love how AI art is evolving with better and better models.
Anonymous
No.2275
2276
2997510.png

Anonymous
No.2276
>>2275
Wow. It looks fantastic.
Is this using upscaling and inpainting or...? if you know.
Anonymous
No.2277
2278
>>2274
Speaking of AI evolution how do I update my installation of Stable Diffusion? I heard the new version has no limit on text input and is better at drawing hands.
Anonymous
No.2278
>>2277
The way I do it is that I used git to get the initial code and run an git update in the bat file used to start SD.

So initially do an
>git clone https://github.com/AUTOMATIC1111/stable-diffusion-webui

Then in bat file I do
>...
>set COMMANDLINE_ARGS=--ckpt pony_sfw_80k_safe_and_suggestive_500rating_plus-pruned.ckpt --lowvram --opt-split-attention
>
>cd stable-diffusion-webui
>git pull
>call webui.bat
>cd ..
Anonymous
No.2281
2282 2283
Wtf is he doing to edit the AI generated art and get new ones like that? https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=aFnGO74KsF0
Anonymous
No.2282
2283
>>2281
I assumed he did, but looked at description and he is using the Krita plugin for Stable Diffusion that runs an img2img with prompt. It can take basic input and you have to tell it what it should draw and weight how much it should resemble the input image. I am not fully sure how the weights should be but I think the Krita plugin is fairly easy to use.
First get Krita https://krita.org/
Then install the Krita plugin https://github.com/sddebz/stable-diffusion-krita-plugin

You can do the same in Stable Diffusion webui directly by going to the img2img tab.
Anonymous
No.2283
2287
>>2281
>>2282
I see that he also uses inpaint to fix areas.
I don't have full knowledge on how to use it effectively as my computer takes forever to generate a single image so I can't really play around with it without it taking forever.
Anonymous
No.2287
2288
>>2283
Have you tried using that setting where your generator makes the image tiny and then scales it up?
Anonymous
No.2288
2291 2292
>>2287
I have not tried upscaling or any of the fancy options as the biggest I can generate is 512x512 and even that is pushing my card to the limits. And it takes a couple of minutes to generate an image. So experimenting with settings and what it does is an exercise in patience and remembering what I did half an hour ago and if my changes actually had an impact.
Anonymous
No.2291
2292
>>2288
Damn, that sucks. Back when I had to make do with a piece of shit laptop that would take multiple minutes to boot up and do basic tasks like open the file explorer or open a webpage, I ran Fallout New Vegas at barely 10 frames a second even with the lowest graphics settings and as few mods as possible. The game was borderline unplayable especially when combat started so I had to rely on companions basically doing all combat for me. The lag didn't fuck their attacks up as much. Even the fucking word processor lagged with that thing. A word processor!
Anonymous
No.2292
2293
Does anyone actually believe GPU prices are dropping down anytime soon?
>>2288
Specs?
>>2291
Lmao
My trashtop struggles to run Halo 2 on anything but low settings.
Android-x86 is game-changing tho. if your phone is old and shitty like mine.
I couldn't have possibly run the PC version of Honkai on that thing.
Anonymous
No.2293
2294
>>2292
>Does anyone actually believe GPU prices are dropping down anytime soon?
There was talk that GPU prices could drop when Etherium did their change and no longer required top end GPU to mine coins (or something like that). But I assume the Manufacturers/Shops have gotten used to getting paid top dollars so sadly it might take a good while before it drops.

>Specs?
My GPU is an GTX 1060 3GB so it is on the low end to be able to run it at all.
Anonymous
No.2294
2295
artworks-tqvum3VtN9KrP2rh-5O9Fyw-t500x500.jpg
>>2293
>But I assume the Manufacturers/Shops have gotten used to getting paid top dollars
I guess so. I remember some Anons warning about this before.
>GTX 1060 3GB
>Low-end
Welp, I guess I shouldn't even bother.
Anonymous
No.2295
>>2294
>Welp, I guess I shouldn't even bother.
I think minimum recommended is 4GB card and 3GB is lowest that they had been able to run it on. Still the AI is able to run on consumer grade GPU compared to others that need 40GB+ cards to run so it is much better than what it could have been. But been a while since I read the FAQ and could be they have managed to lower the spec needed (looks like 2GB vram is lowest now) People have been able to run it on CPU only but significantly slower but it is possibilities.

>Nvidia guide: https://rentry.org/voldy
>CPU guide: https://rentry.org/cputard
>AMD guide: https://rentry.org/sdamd
(think this is still the relevant guides)
Anonymous
No.2296
2297
Can my hp laptop run Crysis Stable Diffusion?
Asking for a poorfag fren that might want to generate mares.
Anonymous
No.2297
>>2296
I think if you run the CPU version it could work. Not sure though as I haven't tried the CPU one, but it might be worth checking out. If it has an Nvidia GPU with 2GB or more vram it should run according to the guide without problem.
Anonymous
No.2298
2299
Isn't there a command you can add to the .bat file to make it generate images slower while using less memory at once?
Anonymous
No.2299
>>2298
Yes, the "--lowvram --opt-split-attention" in the COMMANDLINE_ARGS is the command line args for lowram systems. The "--ckpt " is to select what model it uses (the pony model in this example)
>set COMMANDLINE_ARGS=--ckpt pony_sfw_80k_safe_and_suggestive_500rating_plus-pruned.ckpt --lowvram --opt-split-attention
Anonymous
No.2300
2301
Wait do you mark a word or phrase with (((these))) or !!!these!!! to increase or decrease the importance the AI gives to those words in the request?
Anonymous
No.2301
>>2300
Yes you have a few weighting and other tricks to do in prompt. Cant remember them all or find the guide that had it all listed but I guess it is in here somewhere https://rentry.org/sdgoldmine
(((increased importance))) - the more paratheses the more importance it should be given
Anonymous
No.2302
2303 2312
1669998071313721.png
1669998768350145m.jpg
1669998857469868m.jpg
1669998967107691.jpg
1669999192168793.png
https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/406797368
Quality thread.
Anonymous
No.2303
1669999408935761.png
1669999475170373.jpg
1669999567622077.jpg
1669999615283604.jpg
1669999624965005.jpg
>>2302
Anonymous
No.2304
2305
1669999606545114.jpg
1669999638796691.jpg
1669999774402705m.jpg
1669999812346890m.jpg
1669999842440563m.jpg

Anonymous
No.2305
2306
1669999842848680.jpg
1670000325202363m.jpg
1670000428702158.jpg
1670000549812407m.jpg
1670000664738499m.jpg
>>2304
Anonymous
No.2306
2307
1670000842731049.jpg
1670000905013107m.jpg
1670001104534665m.jpg
1670001162192829m.jpg
1670001542255906.jpg
>>2305
Anonymous
No.2307
2308 2311
1670001805594602.jpg
1670001815746555.png
1670001894267439.jpg
1670002123728315.jpg
1670002224303399m.jpg
>>2306
Anonymous
No.2308
2309
1670002276603849.jpg
1670002329815425.png
1670002375102997m.jpg
1670002396903050m.jpg
1670002707694141m.jpg
>>2307
Anonymous
No.2309
1670002701382999.jpg
1670002764205245.jpg
1670003086529193.jpg
1670003242273582.jpg
>>2308
Anonymous
No.2311
>>2307
>pic 3
The AI reinterpreted two hoes into one waifu, but one of the hoes is fat enough to be two women.
Anonymous
No.2312
>>2302
Love the AI renderings. Looking forward to getting "colorized" videos in AI rendering. So much good too look forward to.
Anonymous
No.2313
Has anyone by the way run any of the CWC comics through any of the AI's yet?
Anonymous
No.2316
SuitcaseMan.png

Anonymous
No.2317
2318
6568869.png
6569950.png
6570764.png
6572017.png
6572200.jpg

Anonymous
No.2318
>>2317
nice
Anonymous
No.2319
2999898.png

Anonymous
No.2320
2321
How are you AI generating porn?
Anonymous
No.2321
2348
>>2320
There is an NSFW model but can't find link to it . I assume that is the one being used
...Found the link
>https://desuarchive.org/mlp/thread/39110334/#39114433
>>NSFW Pony Model Weights.
>>https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/14JyQE36wYABH-0TSV_HBEsBJ3r8ZITrS?usp=sharing
Anonymous
No.2325
2327
image.png
why
Anonymous
No.2326
2327
Just updated my Stable Diffusion install, I see new buttons and features but the limit on prompts is still there.
How do I get rid of that text limit?
Anonymous
No.2327
2329
>>2326
>>2325
If you want to get rid of text being generated in image add "text" to negative prompt. At least it usually works to get rid of mangled signatures and such in images.
Anonymous
No.2329
2330
>>2327
There's a limit on the number of prompts I can give the AI at once. It's around 75 words. How do I break this limit on input text?
Anonymous
No.2330
2332
>>2329
Not sure, but have you tested if the limit is on number of keywords individual words or if it is on prompt sections.
Like:
>word1, word2, word3, ...
>full sentence 1, full sentence 2, ....
...
>pony, flower, lake
>pony standing in field by a lake surrounded by flowers, stars, moon, (unicorn), by Peter Elson
(I have not run these examples so I have no idea what they will produce)

Only limit I can see is on full input, but I think this is a limit in Stable Diffusion that the webui can't circumvent. But could be that there is a limit on the number of "sections" i.e. keywords, keysentences.
Anonymous
No.2331
image.png
image.png
image.png
image.png
>request man in blue jacket with white flames
Wow, whoever made this AI model loves men.
Anonymous
No.2332
>>2330
Also I updated my Stable Diffusion installation after wiping my PC. Now the text limit gets slightly higher whenever I go over the limit. Seems to be missing key words now and then, unless I'm using the wrong terms for some things like pony_ears.
Anonymous
No.2334
2335
6572823.png
6573674.png
6576319.jpg
6577171.png
6577183.png
Holy mother of God.
Anonymous
No.2335
>>2334
Does putting Text in the negative prompt get rid of that watermark?
What about mixing the model with other models?
Anonymous
No.2336
Flo_bPaWIAEQpvs.jpg
1upxsmuzgm7a1.jpg
Art Subreddit Bans Guy Because His Work “Looks Like It was AI-Generated”
https://nichegamer.com/art-subreddit-bans-artist-style-ai/
Anonymous
No.2337
Who are your favourite artists to use for art generation?
Anonymous
No.2342
2343 2344
image.png
image.png
image.png
image.png
image.png
>type "horse vagina" over and over
>get this
why
Anonymous
No.2343
2344
image.png
image.png
image.png
image.png
image.png
>>2342
I thought combining AI models would make it better at producing horse pussy, not worse. What the hell is this?
Anonymous
No.2344
2345
>>2342
>>2343
Looks like you need different generating terms or a differently learned model.
Anonymous
No.2345
>>2344
When I wrote
>blonde
no blonde hair
when I wrote (((((blonde))))) to emphasize the tag above all others I got that weird yellow pic.
Anonymous
No.2346
Spoilered
Spoilered
Spoilered
Spoilered
Spoilered
Twilight Sparkle
Anonymous
No.2347
2348
Spoilered
Spoilered
Spoilered
Spoilered
Rainbow Dash
I'm bored now. The art is coming out crappy. I don't think I'll do the rest of the mane six.
Anonymous
No.2348
2349
>>2347
Are you using the Waifu Model or Pony Model?
>>2321 (Pony model NSFW)
>>2167 (Pony Model SFW)
Anonymous
No.2349
2350
Spoilered
Spoilered
Spoilered
Spoilered
Spoilered
>>2348
I don't remember if I combined those with the other models or not but I'm sure Everything V3 and an anime waifu model are in there.
The mixed model can't make good porn.
Anonymous
No.2350
2351
1673721292.png
1673721186.png
>>2349
Just wondered as the rendering looked a bit like the ones I got when I tried to generate MLP using Waifu model.
>pic 1 Waifu Model (v1.2)
>pic 2 Pony Model

>twilight_sparkle, mlp, seductive
>Steps: 20, Sampler: Euler a, CFG scale: 7, Seed: 3967284458, Size: 512x512
>Not the best seed I guess
Anonymous
No.2351
2352
16737233.png
>>2350
And just to have it added too here is the same prompt and seed in NSFW Pony Model
Anonymous
No.2352
>>2351
Oh my, are they holding hooves?! How lewd!
Anonymous
No.2372
df.jpeg
df2.jpg
>Deepfakes: Faces Created by AI Now Look More Real Than Genuine Photos
>Spoiler alert:
>The single real face in the composite image above is located in the second column from the left, fourth image from the top.
https://www.activistpost.com/2023/01/deepfakes-faces-created-by-ai-now-look-more-real-than-genuine-photos.html
Anonymous
No.2389
So I tried generating something with the (((((arcane style))))) tag and got this.
Turns out if you overrate Arcane's importance you get weird satanic looking shit.
Anonymous
No.2393
File (hide): AC66438689DB8C678C7E5FC03A9B896C-35579587.mov (33.9 MB, Resolution:640x572 Length:00:01:16, 1675462164.mov) [play once] [loop]
1675462164.mov