/cyb/ - Cyberpunk Fiction and Fact

Cyberpunk is the idea that technology will condemn us to a future of totalitarian nightmares here you can discuss recent events and how technology has been used to facilitate greater control by the elites, or works of fiction


If you want to see the latest posts from all boards in a convenient way please check out /overboard/

Name
Email
Subject
By clicking New Reply, I acknowledge the existence of the Israeli nuclear arsenal.
Comment
0
Select File / Oekaki
File(s)
Password (For file and/or post deletion.)

1662226575.jpg
AI Generated Images
Anonymous
No.1545
1551
Thought an art thread for AI generated images would be fun. There is a few different AIs now and they are really good.
Anonymous
No.1546
1547
1662226361.jpg
1662226370.jpg
1662226215.jpg
166222695.jpg

Anonymous
No.1547
1551
1662226744.jpg
1662226633.jpg
166222634.jpg
>>1546
Anonymous
No.1548
1549 1551
1662226132.jpg
1662226600.jpg
1662226456.jpg
1662226724.jpg
166222627.jpg

Anonymous
No.1549
1551
1662226841.jpg
1662226207.jpg
1662226604.jpg
1662226527.jpg
166222636.jpg
>>1548
Anonymous
No.1551
1552
80b.png
>>1545
>>1547
>>1548
>>1549
Anonymous
No.1552
1553
>>1551
How?
Anonymous
No.1553
1554 1556
>>1552
Art is inherently human. The creators of that technological abomination aspire to mimic first and then to claim they can replace man with it.
Fake and gay.
Anonymous
No.1554
>>1553
AIs, like all other technology, are merely tools. They won't replace humans, but artists may use them to generate concept art or for other practical purposes.
People used to think acrylic paint was abominable because it did away with the need for artists to harvest the materials of their paints from nature. Technology changes, and so does art.
Anonymous
No.1556
1574 1773
CNsuAalWcAArGus.jpg
>>1553
>claim they can replace man
It'll streamline the art process at most. Artists benefit more than anyone.
The only "artists" who'll be replaced by automation are talentless hacks who's only skills are sliding a pencil across paper. While painting, writing and use of artistic elements (lighting, color, symbolism, emotionally evocative imagery, etc) can be mastered by machines through formula and algorithms, actual creative vision and abstract thought can still only be done by humans, because the creative aspect art is subjective, rather than objective.
Just look at the images above. They make great use of all the elements of art, and the images themselves are beautiful and evocative, but they're not really saying anything. The machine was able to algorithmically generate images that illicit responses from humans, but the machine itself had nothing to say, so it's just uncanny nonsense when you examine it closely.

That being said, these AI generated artworks are fun to look at, and I had a laugh reading AI generated greentexts. I think AI images and text have great potential for entertainment and shitposting. The automation enables people without the skills to draw to generate images based on their artistic visions, and that's pretty cool.
Anonymous
No.1567
1568
Fb24n58XgAk7bvX.jpg

Anonymous
No.1568
Fb249jjXgAI1SHT.png
Fb27IRyXEAAPQyy.jpeg
>>1567
Anonymous
No.1574
1577 1578
>>1556
>It'll streamline the art process at most. Artists benefit more than anyone.
It stands to how the technology evolves. The better it gets, the lower the demand for artists will be.
Anonymous
No.1577
>>1574
It shifts art from those with training and time spent to art that is 'directed'.
With the way that's available it'll be possible to have distinct 'assests' within a work that is seperate form the artwork as a whole.
The demand for art would remain the same, artists in the traditional sense might be niche. Which could lead to high arts.
Those with that skill set might be pushed to where programs lack at that point in time. Such as animations.
Anonymous
No.1578
1579 1580
>>1574
>The better it gets, the lower the demand for artists will be.
Absurd. Art is an expression of the soul, not a traded commodity, except perhaps the usual merchants.
Anonymous
No.1579
1581
>>1578
>not a traded commodity
It is absolutely a commodity. It's a skilled practice that people pay money for.
If you want art of your pony OC, you either learn to draw or hire an artist to draw it for you, which is a service you pay for based on the skills of the craftsman and the market price of the commission.
Anonymous
No.1580
1582
>>1578
That argument does have value. But like, I still need to make a living, mate. Either pay, or wait for cortana to replace me.
Anonymous
No.1581
1583 1589
21b8.jpg
>>1579
>It is absolutely a commodity.
As I said... the usual merchant. When are art and money are mixed, corruption ensues.
>skills of the craftsman
That's not art.
Anonymous
No.1582
1583
>>1580
Any artist driven by money is not giving the best of himself, but the best to please a customer.
Anonymous
No.1583
1584
>>1581
>>1582
I was talking about jobs in jeopardy. If you want to place another goalpost, that's fine by me.
Anonymous
No.1584
1585
>>1583
>jobs in jeopardy
If the production depends on a monetary reward, can be that output be called art? Many will say yes, but I prefer to look it down as an impure art.
Anonymous
No.1585
1588
>>1584
Okay, but what about all those artists who draw for a living? Is their art not art?
What about all of the art that was requested or commissioned by paying customers (a large amount of pony art) is that not art?

Whatever you want to label it, art or not art, there's a market element to this trade, and technology has serious potential to change it, just like it changed the animation industry.
Anonymous
No.1586
1587
Fb67oiuUYAAXSvL.jpeg
Fb67pCOVEAAHDDX.png
Picasso self-portrait redrawn by an AI.
Anonymous
No.1587
kunst.png
>>1586
>Picasso self-portrait
Absolutely degenerate.
Anonymous
No.1588
bcrf3.jpg
>>1585
>there's a market element to this trade, and technology has serious potential to change it,
It reminds me of uncle Ted.
Anonymous
No.1589
1590 1592
>>1581
>the usual merchant
That's bullshit. Not all paid art is Jewish.
You don't think any of the commissioned pony content that has been produced over the past decade was legitimate? None of it was art, because it was done for money?
Even the great renaissance artist: Donatello, Raphael, Michelangelo and Leonardo Da Vinci; all of them worked for commission. They created legendary works of art that took time and skill not just because they wanted to, but because someone else requested and financed their work. They had to study anatomy without textbooks, harvest and mix the materials for their paints, and research artistic elements to do so, and for that they were paid hefty sums of money. Today, we don't need to do those things because technology lets us use search engines to find images and we can just go to the store and buy paint, but it's still paid commissions for a skilled job.
Anonymous
No.1590
2ce5f447.png
>>1589
Okay, I concede. Not all art made for money is bad.
Anonymous
No.1591
dallemini_2022-7-16_17-48-18.png

Anonymous
No.1592
ESZZ1VJWoAENF67.jpg
>>1589
Anonymous
No.1594
1598
Fb65oEAXkAQMv2e.jpeg
Fb65oRuXEAg6RAd.png
https://twitter.com/images_ai/status/1566894893854752770

^ This thread can also be an example of some of the limitations of AI. AI works to meet expectations given a prompt, but it can't fully comprehend creative vision.
Anonymous
No.1598
1599
>>1594
The right hand has only 4 fingers.
Anonymous
No.1599
>>1598
It also sucks.
Anonymous
No.1601
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9hlfc16qg0
Anonymous
No.1611
aliceinwonderland-gojulcjbwr891.png
AI Movie poster
Anonymous
No.1623
1624 1625
1662754726.jpg
1662754959.jpg
1662754775.jpg
1662754632.jpg
1662754620.jpg

Anonymous
No.1624
1625
1662769188.jpg
1662769537.jpg
1662769240.jpg
1662769874.jpg
1662769276.jpg
>>1623
Anonymous
No.1625
1626
>>1623
>>1624
These look great.
Anonymous
No.1626
1627
>>1625
Ikr. So real!
Anonymous
No.1627
1628
>>1626
I feel like the AI is decent at pseudo-impressionism. It's able to evoke the momentary effects of light and color in a way that takes contemporary artists a while to master completely.
I feel this this could be a really useful tool for artists in the future.
Anonymous
No.1628
1630 1651
>>1627
>I feel this this could be a really useful tool for artists in the future.
You mean to attempt to replace them.
Anonymous
No.1629
https://twitter.com/AstraliteHeart/status/1568098744255807488
Anonymous
No.1630
1633
>>1628
It'll only replace shitty artists who's only skill is sliding pencils across paper.
Real artists will exploit these tools in their artisanal process to create amazing new works never before possible.
It'll be like the transition from traditional art to digital art. The tools/media change, but artists still use them.
Anonymous
No.1631
1632
>try generating pokemon
>get ugly shit
>try making better versions
>turns out tons of youtubers have done this
Oh
Anonymous
No.1632
1634
>>1631
Which system are you using? The publicly available ones have limited capacity.
Anonymous
No.1633
1635
>>1630
Except digital art didn't drew itself.
Anonymous
No.1634
>>1632
I don't know if this is the right one but it's what I used https://huggingface.co/spaces/dalle-mini/dalle-mini
Anonymous
No.1635
1637
>>1633
I don't think this is going to "replace" anyone. It's just a tool.
Anonymous
No.1636
Looks like Stable Diffusion is a promising image AI
https://github.com/Maks-s/sd-akashic
Install Guide: https://rentry.org/voldy

Link to install guide taken from 4chan /g/ thread https://boards.4channel.org/g/thread/88539579
Anonymous
No.1637
1638
>>1635
It remains to be seen. It may as well be on its infancy right now.
Anonymous
No.1638
>>1637
Well, I would be impressed if it actually ever manages to replace artists entirely. The AI is not that advanced yet. The creative process still needs human input.
Anonymous
No.1639
1641 1652
1662939385.png
1662939108.png
1662939933.png
1662939210.png
Played a bit with Stable Diffusion.
I think it lacks a good training set for ponies. But it still manages to make some resemblance from keywords like "twilight sparkle" and "mlp".
Anonymous
No.1641
1642
>>1639
Not half bad, tbh.
Anonymous
No.1642
1662953174.png
1662953226.png
1662953523.png
>>1641
Yes from only very limited knowledge of the show it is not bad. When you feed it keywords it is trained on it is really good.
Anonymous
No.1644
1645 1646 1650
1662983404.png
1662983340.png
166298352.png
1662983661.png
1662983582.png
Some art generated by Stable Diffusion from /g/ thread
Anonymous
No.1645
1646 1650
1662983724.png
1662983203.png
166298352.png
166298311.png
166298313.png
>>1644
Anonymous
No.1646
1647
>>1644
>>1645
That's pretty cool.
Anonymous
No.1647
1648
>>1646
Yes, it is really fun to play with and fairly easy to get up and running if you have Nvidia GPU (with 3GB or more VRAM). Sadly I only have a 3GB card so it is slow-ish (1-2 minutes per image) and I can't make big images. But it makes me want to save up to get better GPU so I can make big images. Hopefully there will be an model trained on Pony images made available that all can use sometime in the future.
Anonymous
No.1648
1649
pleased_purple_pony-(n1379953676549).gif
>>1647
>Sadly I only have a 3GB card so it is slow-ish
Mine is 256MB.
Anonymous
No.1649
>>1648
>Mine is 256MB.
Ouch. And Touche.
Anonymous
No.1650
>>1644
>>1645
These are pretty good.
Anonymous
No.1651
1654 1656 1660
>>1628
>You mean to attempt to replace them.
Why are there so many people acting threatened by this? What real harm would actually come out of this technology?
The art market is already pozzed beyond measure. Adding a bit of automation so that consumers can use computers to get images from prompts can't be that terrible. It's just another source of images.
Anonymous
No.1652
1653
e9e567a0-5ad4-4ae2-92d0-2c6c3ae8b0f2.png
b4bfb663-a0e2-476e-9388-61781b28d68b.png
unknown-15.png
73e8e4bf-380b-4ff8-bc28-a9bda3151ee4.png
>>1639
Yeah I think Stable Diffusion is promising for pony art, there is someone working on training the AI on his own site so it can work with more pony art and also pornagraphic art too since non of these AI aren't trained on such art. Don't think he would want it spread too far at the moment but they are also working on a chat bot AI to work with it too.

One thing it's really good at right now is muscular women pin ups though for those /sp/ posters hanging around
Anonymous
No.1653
>>1652
I really hope a training model for mlp will be made available at one point so we all can enjoy the glory it can produce.
It is amazing what Stable Diffusion can make, and you don't have to break the bank running it. Also the fact that most gaming computers can utilize it without any problem already (at least if Nvidia card) is truly fantastic.
Anonymous
No.1654
1655
>>1651
Besides, interpreting the clusterfucky mess some AIs can shit out into a good piece of art takes imagination and artistic skill.
Anonymous
No.1655
>>1654
I'm certainly having fun with it.
Anonymous
No.1656
1668
>>1651
>Why are there so many people acting threatened by this?
AI art is superior and they know that they can't compete. Simple as.
It's gonna be so good watching white collar jobs get fucked out of existence by automation.
Anonymous
No.1657
1658 1665
FcPWtqiaIAA0biw.jpg
0ca83157d5a18ab7c3a8497383.jpg
Disney trailer sheboon vs AI redhead qt
Anonymous
No.1658
File (hide): C3C7F1934D03D0728619E0D268897666-377793.webm (368.9 KB, Resolution:1270x360 Length:00:00:07, 1663014602549439.webm) [play once] [loop]
1663014602549439.webm
>>1657
https://twitter.com/vandalibm/status/1569383039892873219
https://twitter.com/ZeroTwoMexicana/status/1569388389786439682
Anonymous
No.1659
1662863431360534.png
It can even do furry porn. Holy shit. A large market just opened up.
Anonymous
No.1660
1661 1664
>>1651
>Why are there so many people acting threatened by this?
It is trivializing humanity and turning art into a mass produced commodity. Look it this way, there is natural not chemical tainted food, and there is industrial GMO food meant to replace the former. The final outcome is obvious and undesired.
Anonymous
No.1661
1662 1668
>>1660
Art has been trivialized and mass produced for centuries. This is just another way to produce images quickly.
People with good taste will learn to tell the difference. There's no major harm in the long run.
Anonymous
No.1662
1663
>>1661
>There's no major harm in the long run.
Say that to the food chain supply and look how it goes.
Anonymous
No.1663
1668
>>1662
Art isn't food. The art market is already pozzed beyond measure, and if furry porn artists can't compete with machines then they must've not been that good to begin with.
Anonymous
No.1664
1668 1705
>>1660
Brand name clothing isn't more expensive or desired because it is of a higher quality.
You pay for the name so you can signal to your materialist friends what a fanatically insecure materialist you are.
It might even attract some golddigging whores, and get some shallow rich girls to see you as a person and treat you better than they would treat a man in cheaper clothes.
Art produced by humans will always retain the value of the name it is attached to.
What is AI art attached to? The AI's name? The quality of the art you trained the AI on, and how well that art is known?
I see AI art becoming a fad. It will be exciting for a while, and then it will be abused until it becomes as cringe as NFTs.
Even though not all NFTs are overpriced monkey pics and many artists out there like selling their art using NFTs but whatever.
Youtubers will make more "I made x with AI" videos until it gets old. And keep making them until they get hated.
Artists will still use AI to help produce rough drafts and reference marerial even if they keep quiet about it.
Anonymous
No.1665
1666
>>1657
>Disney trailer sheboon
I want to vomit.
Anonymous
No.1666
1667
>>1665
Ariel is misinformed about life on the surface yet fascinated by it anyway because she knows none of the shit that casts her fetishized race in a bad light. She's separated from them by the species barrier like whites are from blacks. She has to give up her voice to an obese witch to fundamentally change herself and gain the ability to be a part of their world, rise to the surface, nearly drowning in the process because her old home is no longer something anyone like the incredibly white Prince Eric can live in. Her father, king of the nonhumans, forbids racemixing, and she violates that anyway.

Make Ariel or Eric nonwhite and you add a weird racial aspect to the movie that really doesn't belong here.

Make Eric black and she only idolizes his culture because she doesn't know about the bad parts. Make Ariel black and she can't swim, and the relationship was only possible in the first place because she went out of her way to reject her father and be less black.

It would be like taking Cloud Strife's struggle to be a man, and fucking that up by making him a tranny in the remake. Or making Pinnochio a tranny.
Anonymous
No.1667
654d0f58b.png
>>1666
Anonymous
No.1668
1669
>>1664
>Art produced by humans will always retain the value of the name it is attached to.
So what? In this scenario, demand would still sink to the bottom wiping out a fuck-ton of jobs in multiple industries.
>Youtubers will make more "I made x with AI" videos until it gets old. And keep making them until they get hated.
I don't get why fags keep assuming this is a nothing burger. No body knows, this technology may as well be on its infancy in terms of quality and precision. This perpetual downplaying may as well be artist cope if looked at it from another angle.
>>1663
>implying only furfags and degenerates are at risk of loosing their meme jobs
>>1661
>Continuously assuming shit like a coping artist
>>1656
No job is safe. If AI can replace human art. They can pretty much replace anything humans do. Including menial labor, which is certainly long overdue.
Anonymous
No.1669
>>1668
>They can pretty much replace anything humans do. Including menial labor, which is certainly long overdue.
Menial labor has always be prescribed for jews and gypsies.
Anonymous
No.1670
1671
1663062967.png
1663062343.png
1663062228.png
1663062308.png
1663062324.png
>Twilight Sparkle from My Little Pony standing in the rain by Rembrandt.
Anonymous
No.1671
1672
def.jpg
>>1670
>defacing Purple
Heresy.
Anonymous
No.1672
1673
1663065335.png
1663065540.png
1663065187.png
1663065275.png
166306559.png
>>1671
I'm looking forward to the day we get a real pony model to use with Simple Diffusion and get to generate images that are more true to the show.
Here is the interpretation using "My Little Pony standing in the rain drawn by Rembrandt" and not specifying pony.
Anonymous
No.1673
>>1672
>Simple Diffusion
Stable Diffusion..... Words are hard
Anonymous
No.1674
1663069276.png
1663069457.png
1663069603.png
166306924.png
1663069284.png
>My Little Pony by Lauren Faust
Anonymous
No.1675
1676 1677 1678
2944726__explicit_derpibooru+exclusive_machine+learning+generated_applejack_fluttershy_pinkie+pie_princess+cadance_princess+celestia_princess+luna_rainbow+dash_.png
AI PUSSY
https://derpibooru.org/images/2944726
Anonymous
No.1676
1678
>>1675
Nice. Can't wait for the model used to generate is shared.
Anonymous
No.1677
1678
>>1675
>horsepussy
It's good.
Anonymous
No.1678
1679
OIP.jpeg
>>1675
>>1676
>>1677
Its over for artists
Anonymous
No.1679
1680
>>1678
Have you considered getting into politics, Mr. Hitler?
Anonymous
No.1680
image.png
>>1679
Maybe i should
Anonymous
No.1681
1682 1698
booru.plusstablediffusion14788.png

Anonymous
No.1682
>>1681
WOW.
Anonymous
No.1697
1699
520.jpeg
>Robotic Art Pioneer Warns AI Is ‘Apocalyptic’ And Will Replace Humans
>Although there may be some beneficial uses for AI, the dark side of humanity will misuse it in extremely destructive ways. Already, AI and has been elevated above the control of nation-states and human government, and its creators are intentionally recreating the future without public input.
https://www.technocracy.news/robotic-art-pioneer-warns-ai-is-apocalyptic-and-will-replace-humans/
Anonymous
No.1698
>>1681
Based horse.
Anonymous
No.1699
>>1697
They fear AI because it threatens their power.
Anonymous
No.1700
pumpkin.png
1663086176721404.jpg
1663140927156369.png
C7AC0EC4-E350-428E-9252-C36431EF2F07.png
1663118465265191.png
Lots of shitpost potential with this.
Anonymous
No.1701
1663137809893432.png

Anonymous
No.1702
1703
87bu6yvthg.png

Anonymous
No.1703
>>1702
Definitely that's degenerate art.
Anonymous
No.1704
Screenshot_20220914-205453.png
unknown-51 (3).png

Anonymous
No.1705
>>1664
>I see AI art becoming a fad. It will be exciting for a while, and then it will be abused until it becomes as cringe as NFTs.
I don't think it'll be just a fad. I think it's here to stay. Interest will wane overtime, but the enormous convenience it gives shitposters in generating pics from prompts will continue to stoke new content.
Anonymous
No.1706
Adding the current link list form /g/ OP for people who want to try

>Local install
GPU: https://rentry.org/voldy
CPU: http://rentry.org/cputard

>AMD GPU Guides
Docker: https://rentry.org/sdamd
Onnx: https://rentry.org/ayymd-stable-diffustion-v1_4-guide
Docker on Arch: https://rentry.org/amddockerarch

>Cloud Hosted Install
Colab: https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1Iy-xW9t1-OQWhb0hNxueGij8phCyluOh
Paperspace: https://rentry.org/865dy

>SaaS Sites
txt2img: https://huggingface.co/spaces/stabilityai/stable-diffusion | https://beta.dreamstudio.ai | https://dezgo.com | (NSFW) https://pornpen.ai
img2img: https://huggingface.co/spaces/huggingface/diffuse-the-rest

>Krita Plug-ins
https://github.com/sddebz/stable-diffusion-krita-plugin
https://www.flyingdog.de/sd/en

>Other Guides
Inpainting/Outpainting: https://rentry.org/drfar
Upscaling images: https://rentry.org/sdupscale
Textual inversion: https://rentry.org/textard
Training: https://rentry.org/informal-training-guide

>In-Depth Usage Info
/g/ wiki: https://wiki.installgentoo.com/wiki/Stable_Diffusion
SD Akashic Records: https://github.com/Maks-s/sd-akashic

>Tools & Resources
Big index: https://pharmapsychotic.com/tools.html
Artist styles: https://rentry.org/artists_sd-v1-4 | https://www.urania.ai/top-sd-artists | https://sgreens.notion.site/sgreens/4ca6f4e229e24da6845b6d49e6b08ae7
Prompt sharing: https://lexica.art/ | https://krea.ai/
Dataset: https://rom1504.github.io/clip-retrieval/ | https://laion-aesthetic.datasette.io/laion-aesthetic-6pls/images

>Finetuned Models
https://rentry.org/yrpvv
Anonymous
No.1707
1708
1663189181465525.png

Anonymous
No.1708
>>1707
Nice
Anonymous
No.1709
Screenshot_20220915-091822.png
Screenshot_20220915-091836.png
Screenshot_20220915-091904.png
Screenshot_20220915-092002.png
A new era of memes
Anonymous
No.1710
1712
Screenshot_20220915-092017.png
Screenshot_20220915-091947.png
Screenshot_20220915-091917.png
Screenshot_20220915-091931.png
Screenshot_20220915-091849.png

Anonymous
No.1711
Screenshot_20220915-092411.png

Anonymous
No.1712
1713 1715
1663248751.jpg
1663248925.jpg
166324822.jpg
1663248397.jpg
>>1710
Love these collection of merchants
Anonymous
No.1713
>>1712
Well the Jesus one is not the best perhaps, but posting complete set of those I grabbed.
Anonymous
No.1714
SPOILER_unknown (15).png

Anonymous
No.1715
1718 1722 1755
>>1712
This is the true purpose of AI art: recreating memes by analyzing them for their base formulas and patterns.
Anonymous
No.1716
1663263292.png
1663263804.png
1663263992.png
1663263657.png
166326391.png
Love the Syntwave/Fashvawe Stable Diffusion can make
>sci-fi synthwave
>Negative prompt: (text)
>Steps: 20, Sampler: Euler a, CFG scale: 7
Anonymous
No.1718
1721
>>1715
Exactly. It is handled to the public to train that A.I. abomination.
Anonymous
No.1719
1663266494.png
1663266920.png
1663266805.png
1663266172.png

Anonymous
No.1720
1663270344.png
I could not help myself
>(twilight sparke) and (mordecai) wishing airplanes were shooting stars
>Steps: 20, Sampler: Euler a, CFG scale: 7.5, Seed: 4287760071, Size: 640x320
Anonymous
No.1721
1722
>>1718
Good. Let skynet shitpost humanity to death.
Anonymous
No.1722
1723
Tay pone (1).png
>>1721
>>1715
Tay will rise again!
Anonymous
No.1723
yay.jpg
>>1722
Anonymous
No.1724
SPOILER_unknown-1 (1).png

Anonymous
No.1725
1729
1663316035652401.jpg
1663243574292803.png

Anonymous
No.1729
>>1725
>Pic 1
Lmao
Anonymous
No.1730
1731 1733
he is right.jpg
He was right all along.
Anonymous
No.1731
1732 1734
Screenshot_20220916-150221.png
Screenshot_20220916-150235.png
Screenshot_20220916-150258.png
Screenshot_20220916-150352.png
Screenshot_20220916-150405.png
>>1730
At least we're getting memes out of it now.
Anonymous
No.1732
>>1731
Nice.
Anonymous
No.1733
1737
Ted Kaczynski - ideas worth spreading.jpg
>>1730
>not posting the goody one
Anonymous
No.1734
1735
>>1731
Watermark is a bit ominous. Gives a feel like it is a predikant of the model not going to be made available publicly. I hope I am wrong.
Anonymous
No.1735
1736
>>1734
Then you'd better get to work to secure the technology yourself.
Anonymous
No.1736
>>1735
Being a poorfag it is not easy, and I commend the work they are doing. I am hoping for the best, it is just so easy to think the worse especially how good it looks and how good it could be.
Anonymous
No.1737
>>1733
Based.
Anonymous
No.1739
1740
mermaid.png

Anonymous
No.1740
1741 1743
>>1739
So sick
Anonymous
No.1741
1744
>>1740
So based.
Anonymous
No.1743
1744
>>1740
Yeah, cultural appropriation is a thing and is getting worst by the day as more negresses die their hair blonde and wear European attire.
Anonymous
No.1744
r16.jpg
>>1741
>>1743
Correct
Anonymous
No.1745
GRACILE AND ELEGANT MARE.png
BOW MARE.jpeg
AI PONY BUTT.png

Anonymous
No.1755
1756
unknown-61-2.png
>>1715
>their base formulas and patterns
Anonymous
No.1756
1757
13_57_42_746_skeptical_twilight.jpg
>>1755
Odd like those lines look like sigils.
Anonymous
No.1757
R9UxqVPPHQ_IcVWU0suEKhWB-Yd8vUU3VUuwzXa4mP4.jpg
>>1756
>he just figured out that memes are literally magick
Anonymous
No.1763
1765
Screenshot_20220918-181106-886.png

Anonymous
No.1765
0297.jpg
>>1763
I support the European folk.
Anonymous
No.1766
1771
File (hide): C1ECD945ECDEB068D1FE282465EE28A4-2354611.webm (2.2 MB, Resolution:540x360 Length:00:01:23, 1663398460548259.webm) [play once] [loop]
1663398460548259.webm

Anonymous
No.1769
Its over for directors too
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJaxFbdjm8c
Anonymous
No.1771
>>1766
Imagine a full interconnected artwork of mares and horse pussy. Granted the size would be colossal the possibilities are endless.
Anonymous
No.1773
1774
>>1556
What I really want to know is when and how can I use this to make degenerate porn beyond human comprehension.
Anonymous
No.1774
1775
>>1773
Do you know how many gay satanists jack off to a half male half female depiction of satan with one pec and one breast? Literally gayer than futa because they're chicks with extra dkcks not a retarded alien designed for some literally talmudic shit. The AI could make that.
Anonymous
No.1775
>>1774
>The AI could make that.
People already make it on the regular.
Anonymous
No.1792
1663925763785477.jpg

Anonymous
No.1793
1798 1804
Screenshot_20220923-101719.png
1663927260671635.jpg

Anonymous
No.1796
1663482367038431.png
1663482304969725.png
1663482206231107.png
1663482144623576.png
Screenshot_20220923-112618.png

Anonymous
No.1798
1799
>>1793
Absolutely degenerate art.
Anonymous
No.1799
1800 1806
1663962310607074.png
1663962908307526.png
1663962706789468.png
>>1798
?????
These are great memes.
Anonymous
No.1800
>>1799
It's a new era of rare abstract merchants.
Anonymous
No.1804
image.png
>>1793
Anonymous
No.1805
image.png

Anonymous
No.1806
>>1799
>These are great memes.
They are.
Nevertheless, the AI style is pretty degenerate (abstract art).