/cyb/ - Cyberpunk Fiction and Fact

>>1867
The Phantom Time Hypothesis? https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qNBFGuJcc6I

>>1868
There are many clues and solid evidence that history is fake. So, to infer that the falsifiers are in possession of knowledge of previous civilizations is not a stretch.

>>1870
>There are many clues and solid evidence that history is fake
I pity that the OP of that thread is a faggot very hostile to any hint deviating from the mainstream.

>>1870
>>1871
If the Middle Ages of Europe were falsified, what about Charlegmane bullshit, Mohammed bullshit, Chinese bullshit, and so on?

>>1872
>what else is falsified?
An important detail to look for is who are the faggot writing history, and not the historical characters.

>>1873
Aren't the historical accounts by countless people alive at the time, and the archeological evidence of the deaths and structures and teeth and shit, looked at by historians today so they can tell when people of the past lied?

>>1874
>by countless people alive at the time
Ah, historical characters.

>>1874
>archeological evidence of the deaths and structures and teeth and shit
All of it interpreted and narrated by a selected clique of faggots and always funded by...?

>>1867
>It is speculation and skepticism about the technological leap.
So, no evidence or motive?
The technology clearly exists now, so it either happened recently (impressive), or it happened decades ago (even more impressive. This is really just splitting hairs.
>An undetermined past.
Well it can't be that far back. Maybe a decade at most, so corpos could ensure that they're the first to profit from the new tech. That much is probable due to corrupt patent laws.
>>1871
Why would they sit on this tech that they could be profiting, aside from corrupt patent favoritism?
The corruption is obvious, but otherwise there's little to be skeptical of. I guess there's probably a lot more yet-to-be-released tech that could improve quality of life across the world that corpos are still withholding to roll out in ways that maximize their profits at the expense of equitability.

>>1867
And here I thought it was something even remotely substantial.
I honestly prefer the cyberpunk dystopia over the schizos ever getting their way.

>>1878
The "Fake History" thread looks abandoned, then a good Tartaria discussion may ensue.

>>1876
Mainstream archeology funded by the jews, but we still have evidence that the holocaust never happened.
Ballpoint pens. Absurd testimonies. Wooden door gas chambers for delousing gas.
What evidence suggests the middle ages never happened?

>>1880
>What evidence suggests the middle ages never happened?
No idea about that subject, but I have knowledge of the World Mud Flood with no historical records.

>>1880
This.
I'm always open to skepticism, but unsubstantiated bullshit with not even a shred of evidence is just an annoying waste of time.

>>1882
>unsubstantiated bullshit
The Mud Flood is a solid, physical fact.

>>1883
I'm not talking about mud flood.
Anyway, this thread is about AI images. Make another thread if you want to have that conversation.

>>1879
>Tardtaria
It should be no surprise that Russians of all people had to come up with it. Such is the urge to downplay their shameful mongolian constitution.
>"Y-you see, they actually stretched all the way to the Americas! We aren't the ONLY rape-babies!"

>>1886
>they actually stretched all the way to the Americas!
Unironically, there are so many American towns with Russian names. I wonder why.

>>1887
>"I must always jump to the most far fetched explanation possible. Why would I consider anything else first?"
You lost the debate, your mind, and now. The trips!
Just call it quits already.

>>1888
>You lost the debate
Nope, there wasn't any debate to begin with.
>Just call it quits already.
>Trips
Okay, when I have time I will open a new bread.
I'm leaving faggots.

Have it your way, nigger.

>>1893
>blonde_hair blue_eyes female military_uniform bread
how did you get better bread results?

>>1894
You never heard of this guy?
https://twitter.com/murrlogic/status/1579306746740633601

>>1895
No. How did he get better bread results?

>>1896
Probably trial and error.
This autistic has been commissioning white women buying expensive wonderbread and clear-cutting forests for years now.

>>1897
What... the fuck?!
Can a fetish so bizarrely specific actually exist?
I once read about a clawfoot bathtub fetishist and met an acme looney tunes cartoon explosion fetishist (I asked if he liked irl explosions, he said no, those are ugly) but this is even more divorced from sex.
At least something technically explodes in bed. At least you can shag someone in a bathtub. How the fuck can this function as a fetish when it's so far removed from sex you'd be forgiven for assuming this is some kind of bizarrely specific wild animal or mother related trauma?

>>1898
Lmao, you didn't know about him already? The guy is a legend. He's spawned countless memes over how cringe he is.

>>1898
>How the fuck can this function as a fetish when it's so far removed from sex
It seems to be based on women expressing extreme arrogance derivative of wealth and power; you could consider arrogance to be effeminate in some measure.

>>1897
Kek I almost forgot about that guy. What champion.
>>1898
idk bro it's almost as weird as this one bizarre image board cult where anons have a tradition of posting mlp porn to pwn the shills. Crazy stuff.

>>1901
But the porn posting makes sense. It tells the shill "You have been found out. You are recognized as a shill and we feel no urge to respect you or follow normal rules of social protocol. We feel no need to pretend you're an honest person posting in good faith. Here are some digitized paintings of cartoon horse vagina. Posting gore to upset you would be more normal, something you're probably used to. You aren't used to pony pussy because you don't belong here. You fool nobody here and nobody here will take your side and call my posting of horse pussy unreasonable. You are outnumbered, now drown in the deluge of pony pussy."
It's better than teabagging someone you shot in a first persob shooter.
A fetish for bitchy rich girls is one thing but the wonder bread obsession makes no sense. Bread isn't sexual. Is it just his favourite type of bread or something?

>>1902
Go to his Twitter and ask him yourself.

>>1902
My point is that I think it's silly to be so surprised by some sperg's autistic fetish given where we are. If had the ability to do so right now, I'd try to use AI to make as much art of my extremely autistic pony fetish that literally no one else has.
>shills
The shill is immunized against all dangers: one may call him a scoundrel, parasite, swindler, profiteer, it all runs off him like water off a raincoat. But post horse pussy at him and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: “I’ve been found out.”

>>1904
Your pc can't run stable diffusion?
I wish I had a bizarre hyper specific fetish. If I had to pick something visual I'd choose big boobs but the AI is shit at big boob art. The areola is in the wrong place, the nips don't look right, the boobs are mismatched or misshapen. It keeps misinterpreting random body parts as boobs, too. Ask it for "thicc" or "large breasts" and it tends to turn random bits of flesh like knees and arms into boobs while making melty faced retard girls. Plus every fucking military uniform it generates is the same olive or blue thing. It's as if someone inseminated the training data with a million fullmetal alchemist pictures. And if I tell the AI to generate characters with Purple_Eyes it makes the military outfit purple, too. Or random parts of it. Stable Diffusion is fun but the world needs Stable Diffusion 2.

>>1897
Kek, now I understand the Wonderbread art pack theme. What a hilarious way to mock the guy.

>>1905
The world needs to be nuked back to the stone age.

>>1907
Humans have always been coomers. Even back in the stone age people were drawing tiddies on cave walls.

>>1910
He clearly made a typo. Not sure what you're implying.

Feds mad that you can generate realistic looking cp, racist depictions of violence, etc.
https://eshoo.house.gov/media/press-releases/eshoo-urges-nsa-ostp-address-unsafe-ai-practices
They want to censor AI.
Separate thread?

>>1912
I can get the cp concern, but the rest is bullshit. It'll be interesting to see what kind of precedent it would set if glowniggers somehow got to "regulate" (control) what people can do with AI.

>>1913
Even with the CP concern, it's hardly different than the lolishit that degens draw already.
I have seen a recent flood of it on pixiv though...
>It'll be interesting to see what kind of precedent it would set if glowniggers somehow got to "regulate" (control) what people can do with AI.
I bet you software licenses will be a thing in the near future.

>>1914
>Even with the CP concern, it's hardly different than the lolishit that degens draw already.
I hadn't even considered lolishit. I hate the shit and I'm convinced that only subhuman pedos are into lolicon/foalfon, but I don't think it'd be too far fetched that they'd push some narrative that AI is being exploited by diddlers and therefore they must exert control over all the software.
Just watch them use it as a bludgeon to push for even more draconian control over people.
>I bet you software licenses will be a thing in the near future.
I'm not very tech savvy, but how could they stop people from sharing open source software without making it outright illegal?

>>1915
Information collection, scare tactics, making it a nuisance to try having open source things.
The people who are hosting get pushed around till a glowie can snoop on 'ownerless' AI generated stuff.
They'd probably use it to generate fake paper trails, push bullshit and so on.
But, as a counter point they really want to finish a couple things.
The digital ID currency crap. The modified people are property clause. Finishing the Globalist world party. Defanging whoever is left.
Not so much as it'll deter them from going foward with such things, but as another shovel to the pile.

>>1911
you could say, im a grammar nazi

>>1914
Aren't software licenses already a thing for subscription services like untorrented adobe shit?
>>1910
Oh, sorry.
A first persobn shooter.
>>1912
Stable Diffusion 2 could be coded with a blacklist of words to ignore or replace with amusing words.
You tell the AI to make "oppai loli"? It gives you deformed AI generated horsecock and melty retard faces.

>>1918
Blacklisting is gay. Don't hamper the machine.

These aren't the best, but it's still impressive. Is there is anything good left in this world, it will be the advent and proliferation of ultra hd, hyper realistic pony pussy.
>>1921
Fucking amazing except for the stumpy leg.

>>1923
The SULTRY GAZES on those Foxes!

>>1582
I used to think it was unethical to prioritize profit in anything that was some kind of art-derivative.
But I think am absolutely okay with micro transactions at this point. Everything I can do or get away with to rape the whales is fair game.
Why should I care when everyone will dispose of me and my work the moment a decent AI comes around?

Funny how AI-art is so close to match Human art.
But there's still not a fucking burger-flipping machine. I hope machine learning fucks manual labour next.

>>1929
>I hope machine learning fucks manual labour next.
It's been fucking the working class for decades and now it's finally getting around to you worthless faggots. You mocked us, called us inferior, and constantly derided us. "Dey took ur jerbz," you'd mockingly post as our livelihoods and communities were destroyed. You deserve worse than this.
Kill yourself, faggot.

>>1582
I am a customer, so I welcome that.

>>1930
>It's been fucking the working class for decades
Not nearly as much as it should've, for the greater good I mean.
Don't agree? Show me the burger-flippator machine or stfu.
>called us inferior
Kek.
Sorry if I don't consider a brick-layer, menial fucktard as a prime example of the greatest qualities of mankind.
>our communities
Spoken like a third world shitskin.
>You deserve worse than this.
>You
Not even a drawfag.

>>1932
Dilate

>>1932
>as it should've
Wtf? Why is fucking the working class a good thing?
>Show me the burger-flippator machine
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KJVOfqunm5E

>First one to take the bait.
They're just not built the same.

>>1937
Not widespread enough, brainlet.

>>1940
You didn't say widespread. There are other examples of widespread automation.
Anyway, there's a clear trend in automation gradually and rapidly replacing jobs in all sectors. It has screwed the working class as jobs are eliminated faster than the economy can grow to replace them. It's not necessarily a bad thing that technology has been replacing those jobs, but to say it's a 'good' thing ignores some very real societal consequences of entire sectors of people being put out of work.
I personally welcome technology replacing the need for manual labor, in both industry and art, but I think people should think ahead about the long term consequences of jobs disappearing, so that we as a society can prepare to re-employ those people with new jobs created by technology.

>>1945
I still think it's fundamentally worse when Art is the target. Forget about employment. If a law somehow managed to end Art as a commodity it wouldn't even matter to me. I've considered Art as the soul and heart of what means to be human for a long time.
How many times have people said corny shit like.
<"Sure, machines are better than humans at a lot of things. But can a machine turn a blank canvas into a masterpiece."

No disrespect for manual labor, a lot of that is also a form of Art in a way. Uncle Adolf said there must be respect between those who work with their mind, and those who work with their body.
The fact AI or machine learning can eventually master every form of human Art might as well be the end of mankind for me. I think many people just forget that AI digital Art, was once as shit as AI writing currently is.
There is nothing that can be done about that. Technology gives and takes. It already killed the mystery behind chess and further diminished the role of creativity.

>>1950
Does AI art really do anything to diminish actual art though? It's not zero sum.
Also, it's worth mentioning that it takes a not-insignificant amount of creativity and persistence to make these images. On top of coming up with a prompt, you have to refresh the program hundreds of times over the course of hours to get satisfying images. That is an expression of the individual, even if it's generated by a machine.
I believe that AI art will usher in a new era of creativity and content/shitposting, where individuals are no longer limited by their personal skill at drawing.
>It already killed the mystery behind chess
Oh yeah. Big RIP for chess players. Even low-power programs are basically unbeatable at this point. It's like trying to arm wrestle the Terminator.

>>1950
>The fact AI or machine learning can eventually master every form of human Art might as well be the end of mankind for me.
Why does it matter though? We live in a nightmarish, dystopian hellhole that's only going to get significantly worse before it might even have a chance of getting better. Who cares?
Also, the human "spirit" isn't going anywhere when it comes to art and artistic expression. People will always find a way to make art in one way or another and AI has no effect on that. Do you really care if the shitty corporate calarts diversity portraits are made by AI?
The reaction to AI art reminds me of when buzzfeed journos were laid off and got told to "learn to code". Poetic justice.

>>1951
>On top of coming up with a prompt
>I believe that AI art will usher in a new era of creativity and content/shitposting, where individuals are no longer limited by their personal skill at drawing.
I apologize for being unnecessarily rude earlier. But, fuck...
Here we go again, over and over again. Do you seriously can't fucking grasp that AI art will most likely NOT be limited to digital drawing? It's like you didn't even read the fucking post.

>>1952
>Also, the human "spirit" isn't going anywhere when it comes to art and artistic expression. People will always find a way to make art in one way or another and AI has no effect on that.
It was perhaps the greatest stronghold of man against the machine. The one thing that was meant to set us apart. Sure you can still play chess...I don't even thing you get it. That or you're not arguing in good faith.
>The reaction to AI art reminds me of when buzzfeed journos were laid off and got told to "learn to code". Poetic justice.
Well I don't think journalism is a great example of the "human spirit", specially the kind of journalism we are talking about.

>>1960
>AI art will most likely NOT be limited to digital drawing?
What's wrong with that? It's more content creation. It's not going prevent people from making their own art without it. It'll just enable people to generate content very quickly. It still requires human input to get ideas in the first place.

>>1961
>It still requires human input to get ideas in the first place.
Bait or sheer retardation. That is kind of the gamble one has to make these days.

>>1962
It hasn't gotten to the point of generating completely original ideas that fulfill needs that people didn't even know they had.

>>1961
Am gonna try one more time just because people seem to be helplessly clueless everywhere I go, and thus I'm inclined to believe you are being serious.
Picture the following.
AI unironically starts writing novels better than anything man can conjure.
As I implied here >>1950
>I think many people just forget that AI digital Art, was once as shit as AI writing currently is.

Do you seriously thing a prompt is hot shit for that kind of AI?
>It hasn't gotten to the point...
<YET

>>1964
>AI unironically starts writing novels better than anything man can conjure.
Okay, but what's so bad about this? Sounds like it could be really productive.

Yeah, I figured it was bait. Great venting in the end, have a nice day lads.

Have a Fluttershy

>>1968
Thanks Karen, pretty cool.

>>1969
Based Karen

>>1960
>It was perhaps the greatest stronghold of man against the machine.
Machines are made by people and I'd consider them an extension of humanity in a way. There is no man vs dichotomy as far as I'm concerned. One should aspire to harness the glory of a big block V8 powering a computer that generates ultra realistic images of pony pussy while running over niggers.
>I don't even thing you get it. That or you're not arguing in good faith.
Reevaluate.

>>1971
>Reevaluate
You don't. Consider yourself victorious either way. It doesn't even matter.

So many cute poners

>>1972
Cheer up. Try considering the pros of AI advancing. Imagine no longer being beholden to artists to get your fix of mares.

>>1987
Based Veggie Tales right once again.

>>1985
>>1987
I should make the first randomly generated fire emblem game.
the music? AI generated. the plot? AI generated. every character? every level? AI generated. Fuck trying to write anything important with deep themes. I should start with the default template people expect from FE and then fill it with AI generated content.

>>2013
Fuck you.

.

.

>>2017
>>2018
>>2019
>>2020
I'm speechless.

>>2021
I see hundreds of pics of this quality on discord every day. I just only bothered dumping some now.

>>2017
>>2018
>>2019
>>2020
Absolutely amazing!
>>2022
More, please!

>>2017
>>2018
>>2019
>>2020
Wow. They look great.
Do you know what model was used to create those images?

Purplesmart AI has been improving:
https://discord.gg/4QDFxbRmjV

>>2024
Program: automatic1111
Model: Astralites Ponyv1
Sampler: Euler a
Prompt: detailed fluffy fur, unicorn, (by taran fiddler and chunie , Michael & Inessa Garmash, Ruan Jia, Pino Daeni), volumetric lighting, ambient bloom, 4K, ((((solo)))), (((golden medieval full armor))), (golden full muzzle helmet with metal ears), (face covered), ((Fire for hair)), holy light

>>2026
Where can I get the Astralites Ponyv1 model?
I tried that prompt without the model and got this.

>>2027
Tested and loos like this is the model.
https://huggingface.co/AstraliteHeart/pony-diffusion
https://mega.nz/file/ZT1xEKgC#Xxir5udMmU_mKaRZAbBkF247Yk7DqCr01V0pDzSlYI0

>>2030
How does the model make art that good when most fandom art is show tracing- I mean vector art?

>>2031
I think that is one of the wonders of Neural Networks. No one knows exactly why it works so good as it does only that it works. But it is hit and misses in depending on seed number.

>>2030
In case people want to know. For that image (that looked best so far and first I ran) used the Prompt by >>2026
>detailed fluffy fur, unicorn, (by taran fiddler and chunie , Michael & Inessa Garmash, Ruan Jia, Pino Daeni), volumetric lighting, ambient bloom, 4K, ((((solo)))), (((golden medieval full armor))), (golden full muzzle helmet with metal ears), (face covered), ((Fire for hair)), holy light
>Steps: 20, Sampler: Euler a, CFG scale: 7, Seed: 3081589709, Size: 512x512

>>2034
I've heard of training girls, but this is ridiculous!
What is this, the next Kantai Collection spinoff?

>>2034
>trains and anime
Add ponies to the equation and we'd have enough autism to go to Mars and back.

>>2037
And Sonic. Autists love Sonic for some reason.
Maybe they wish they were Sonic? Maybe Tails the shy small genius child who wants to be cool like Sonic appeals to them? Maybe they just like fast things.

>>2040
I didn't make it, but thanks.

>>2041
Where's the source?

>>2039
It's good, but it makes me dizzy.

>>2039
Videos like this are further proof that AI generated images doesn't "hurt art", but expands it. The concept of art is being democratized, so that even random people who have no talent for drawing or no time to paint can realize their creative ambitions and silly ideas.
It's said that beauty is in the eye of the beholder. A machine may be able to make immaculate images, but only a human can appreciate them. Likewise, only a human would have thought to use a machine to compile a bunch of anime girls into the Rick Rolled video, and AI helped them do it.

>>2049
Things only have value when they are scarce

>>2052
Art has always been abundant. There's trillions of artworks out there. The fact that unpracticed artists can create their own images with memes just adds to the sphere.
Art didn't suddenly get worse once acrylic paints enabled artists to buy their paint instead of mixing it from the elements.

>>2052
That's only for market value, which is irrelevant. Art's value is subjective.
Just look at the boorus and see how there's tens of thousands of lewd pics of the mane six, but people still get excited when new

>>2053
There aren't. Painting well is hard

>>2054
All value is subjective. That value is based on scarcity. If you have infinite art then all of it becomes boring

There's lots of pics but a tiny fraction of them actually appeal to you. If you can press a button to get a new one perfectly suited to you, you'll get bored of it

EVERYTHING becomes boring if you have an endless supply of it

>>2055
>If you have infinite art then all of it becomes boring
I've seen thousands of conventional pony artworks and thousands of AI artworks in the past couple weeks alone, but I'm not bored at all.
>That value is based on scarcity.
I beg to differ. When it comes to art, the more the merrier.
>If you can press a button to get a new one perfectly suited to you, you'll get bored of it
If I became bored of it, it must have not suited me perfectly.
>EVERYTHING becomes boring if you have an endless supply of it
I already have a virtually endless supply of mare porn for free, and I'm not even close to bored of it yet.

>>2052
Things can have inherent value unrelated to their scarcity and how desired they are.
Incredibly rare randomly generated NFTs unlikely to exist don't have any intrinsic value granted by their rarity.

>>2057
>Incredibly rare randomly generated NFTs unlikely to exist don't have any intrinsic value granted by their rarity.
This, regardless of how scarce something is, it's true value is based on one of two things:
1. How useful it is to people
2. It's subjective, sentimental value
AI art is useful, and also enables people to generate artworks that meet their own subjective tastes.

>>2061
Amogüs

>>2064
>A.I. generated
I doubt it. I believe A.I. assisted might be a more accurate term.

>>2066
CUTE

>>2066
Post steamy honeymoon pics pls
Also, checked devil dubs

>>2120
Nice and hot.

>>2150
Pongle 2.0

Does anyone want a grid of 35-50 images made with your chosen prompt? My PC is pretty powerful.

>>2160
Ooooooo. I can try to think of something but from my testing crafting an effective promt is a science in itself so I am not sure what a good promt would be (my testing on my slow computer have not been too successful).
But if you can try to make some statues like in >>2115 (pic 3) it would be awesome. I think they look awesome.

>>2162
I'll need the prompt and model used for those pics. If I just said "(My Little Pony) garden statue" with the default model that came with the AI when I downloaded it I doubt I'll get good results, but I'll give it a go.

By the way, what does "Tiling" do? Whenever I check that box it just makes the output look inferior. Is there some purpose to it I'm missing?

>>2163
The one I had limited success with (but takes 2-3 minutes per image so I was not able to do to much) was:
>pony statue, majestic, alicorn, 4k hi-res, detailed, granite, cracked surface, weathered
>Steps: 20, Sampler: Euler a, CFG scale: 7, Seed: 174254891, Size: 512x512

>>2164
2-3 minutes per image? That must suck. How many images can you generate at once before your PC runs out of memory?
One time I left my room with an autoclicker generating more sets of images every minute. By the time I got back, I had a few thousand.

>>2166
>How many images can you generate at once before your PC runs out of memory?
I can only run one at a time, and at times have to close other apps that uses memory in order for it to run.
Are you using the Stable Diffusion Model or Waifu model instead of the Pony model? The Pony Model is good and you should try it
https://huggingface.co/AstraliteHeart/pony-diffusion
https://mega.nz/file/ZT1xEKgC#Xxir5udMmU_mKaRZAbBkF247Yk7DqCr01V0pDzSlYI0

>>2167
Yep, that was the problem. It's turning out a lot better with the pony model.

>>2168
Nice

>>2167
Pony model loaded.
Here are some new AI generated pony statues, image sets 3 and 4 were made with the seed you posted instead of a random seed.
Had to split them up because trying to post the next 4 intact broke some kind of limit. "Request Entity too large".

>>2172
Strange that the first image in the set using same seed and prompt didn't yield the same image as I got as it should have done that. Subsequent images when given a seed should give previous_seed+1 when running batches.

>>2174
Maybe there's a second invisible seed somewhere. All the settings were accurately replicated.

>>2176
Strange. For reference the arguments I use to start Stable Diffusion is:
>--ckpt pony_sfw_80k_safe_and_suggestive_500rating_plus-pruned.ckpt --lowvram --opt-split-attention
Other than that I have the standard settings (no scripts or face fixes or anything) and standard txt2img

>>2177
>lowvram --opt-split-attention
I was using those exact settings except for that part. They just reduce the load on your computer and have no effect on the resulting image, right?

>>2178
They should just reduce the memory used and not change what is produced. Just posted full list of arguments in case I'm wrong on that. It was just strange that you didn't get the same image using same prompt and seed.

>>2179
Was Restore Faces turned on?

>>2180
No, none of the extra features are turned on on my end when I generated.

>>2179
>It was just strange that you didn't get the same image using same prompt and seed.
You see, these AI's no longer "mash" images together with the hope of producing a coherent pic.
They basically emulate human creativity.
Artists need external inputs as well. They consciously and unconsciously absorb bits and pieces from every other artwork they may have seen before. Sometimes it may even be apparently unrelated life experiences.
Regardless, when artists draw inspiration from other art sources. They are pretty much doing the same thing that AI's do.
It's impossible to trace back the source pics. What AI's make is about as original as what any human could've conceived.

It makes sense you don't always get the same results, even when all things are equal.

>>2182
>It makes sense you don't always get the same results, even when all things are equal.
Running same seed and prompt I get same image every time. Also running others prompt and seeds (I seen people post) I get same image they get when using the same model they used.

>>2182
I don't think the AI is updating its own model with data from the pictures it generates.
I hope it isn't. I don't want my AI to give itself dementia by using its garbled output as new input.
By now its garbled output probably outnumbers the number of images it was trained on.

Does anyone have any good images? I tried doing a cursory search on ponerpics and the first few pages were horrid dogshit.

The era of abstract merchants has reached a new golden age.
Merchants are being produced faster than the ADL could ever hope to flag them.

>>2234
How do you make these?
I've got Stable Diffusion working, what's the secret?

>>2235
Idk. I got them from Discord.
If you find out any methods, do share. I want to mass produce merchants.

>>1884
That's not what I meant when I said I wanted racks on racks.

>>2241
Racks on racks on racks on racks. Stacked rat stacks in hats on mats.

Pixiv has lost its collective mind recently (more than before).
It's impossible to use the site without being recommended pics of [i]pregnant toddlers!

>>2248
Oh fuck. Don't some models use data taken from pixiv or anime booru sites?

>>2250
>you will never haiy her lcat or her spry aliet hany
Why live?

I got the new Everything V3 model.
It seems more varied than the previous smaller Waifu model I was using.
But it also loves to wash out the colours of anything I make with it. So I often have to saturate this desaturated art output until it looks right.

"Twilight Sparkle"

>>2273
Nice. Not knowing prompt but adding "(unicorn)" to prompt and "(text), devil" to negative prompt might fix some of the devil horns and and text. Love how AI art is evolving with better and better models.

>>2275
Wow. It looks fantastic.
Is this using upscaling and inpainting or...? if you know.

>>2274
Speaking of AI evolution how do I update my installation of Stable Diffusion? I heard the new version has no limit on text input and is better at drawing hands.

>>2277
The way I do it is that I used git to get the initial code and run an git update in the bat file used to start SD.

So initially do an
>git clone https://github.com/AUTOMATIC1111/stable-diffusion-webui

Then in bat file I do
>...
>set COMMANDLINE_ARGS=--ckpt pony_sfw_80k_safe_and_suggestive_500rating_plus-pruned.ckpt --lowvram --opt-split-attention
>
>cd stable-diffusion-webui
>git pull
>call webui.bat
>cd ..

Wtf is he doing to edit the AI generated art and get new ones like that? https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=aFnGO74KsF0

>>2281
I assumed he did, but looked at description and he is using the Krita plugin for Stable Diffusion that runs an img2img with prompt. It can take basic input and you have to tell it what it should draw and weight how much it should resemble the input image. I am not fully sure how the weights should be but I think the Krita plugin is fairly easy to use.
First get Krita https://krita.org/
Then install the Krita plugin https://github.com/sddebz/stable-diffusion-krita-plugin

You can do the same in Stable Diffusion webui directly by going to the img2img tab.

>>2281
>>2282
I see that he also uses inpaint to fix areas.
I don't have full knowledge on how to use it effectively as my computer takes forever to generate a single image so I can't really play around with it without it taking forever.

>>2283
Have you tried using that setting where your generator makes the image tiny and then scales it up?

>>2287
I have not tried upscaling or any of the fancy options as the biggest I can generate is 512x512 and even that is pushing my card to the limits. And it takes a couple of minutes to generate an image. So experimenting with settings and what it does is an exercise in patience and remembering what I did half an hour ago and if my changes actually had an impact.

>>2288
Damn, that sucks. Back when I had to make do with a piece of shit laptop that would take multiple minutes to boot up and do basic tasks like open the file explorer or open a webpage, I ran Fallout New Vegas at barely 10 frames a second even with the lowest graphics settings and as few mods as possible. The game was borderline unplayable especially when combat started so I had to rely on companions basically doing all combat for me. The lag didn't fuck their attacks up as much. Even the fucking word processor lagged with that thing. A word processor!