/cyb/ - Cyberpunk Fiction and Fact

Cyberpunk is the idea that technology will condemn us to a future of totalitarian nightmares here you can discuss recent events and how technology has been used to facilitate greater control by the elites, or works of fiction


Merry Christmas and Happy Hearth's Warming Everyone and Everypony!

[YouTube] The True Gift of Gifting [Embed]

If you want to see the latest posts from all boards in a convenient way please check out /overboard/

Name
Email
Subject
By clicking New Reply, I acknowledge the existence of the Israeli nuclear arsenal.
Comment
0
Select File / Oekaki
File(s)
Password  (For file and/or post deletion.)

1662226575.jpg
AI Generated Images
Anonymous
No.1545
1551
Thought an art thread for AI generated images would be fun. There is a few different AIs now and they are really good.
Anonymous
No.1546
1547
1662226361.jpg
1662226370.jpg
1662226215.jpg
166222695.jpg

Anonymous
No.1547
1551
1662226744.jpg
1662226633.jpg
166222634.jpg
>>1546
Anonymous
No.1548
1549 1551
1662226132.jpg
1662226600.jpg
1662226456.jpg
1662226724.jpg
166222627.jpg

Anonymous
No.1549
1551
1662226841.jpg
1662226207.jpg
1662226604.jpg
1662226527.jpg
166222636.jpg
>>1548
Anonymous
No.1551
1552
80b.png
>>1545
>>1547
>>1548
>>1549
Anonymous
No.1552
1553
>>1551
How?
Anonymous
No.1553
1554 1556
>>1552
Art is inherently human. The creators of that technological abomination aspire to mimic first and then to claim they can replace man with it.
Fake and gay.
Anonymous
No.1554
>>1553
AIs, like all other technology, are merely tools. They won't replace humans, but artists may use them to generate concept art or for other practical purposes.
People used to think acrylic paint was abominable because it did away with the need for artists to harvest the materials of their paints from nature. Technology changes, and so does art.
Anonymous
No.1556
1574 1773
CNsuAalWcAArGus.jpg
>>1553
>claim they can replace man
It'll streamline the art process at most. Artists benefit more than anyone.
The only "artists" who'll be replaced by automation are talentless hacks who's only skills are sliding a pencil across paper. While painting, writing and use of artistic elements (lighting, color, symbolism, emotionally evocative imagery, etc) can be mastered by machines through formula and algorithms, actual creative vision and abstract thought can still only be done by humans, because the creative aspect art is subjective, rather than objective.
Just look at the images above. They make great use of all the elements of art, and the images themselves are beautiful and evocative, but they're not really saying anything. The machine was able to algorithmically generate images that illicit responses from humans, but the machine itself had nothing to say, so it's just uncanny nonsense when you examine it closely.

That being said, these AI generated artworks are fun to look at, and I had a laugh reading AI generated greentexts. I think AI images and text have great potential for entertainment and shitposting. The automation enables people without the skills to draw to generate images based on their artistic visions, and that's pretty cool.
Anonymous
No.1567
1568
Fb24n58XgAk7bvX.jpg

Anonymous
No.1568
Fb249jjXgAI1SHT.png
Fb27IRyXEAAPQyy.jpeg
>>1567
Anonymous
No.1574
1577 1578
>>1556
>It'll streamline the art process at most. Artists benefit more than anyone.
It stands to how the technology evolves. The better it gets, the lower the demand for artists will be.
Anonymous
No.1577
>>1574
It shifts art from those with training and time spent to art that is 'directed'.
With the way that's available it'll be possible to have distinct 'assests' within a work that is seperate form the artwork as a whole.
The demand for art would remain the same, artists in the traditional sense might be niche. Which could lead to high arts.
Those with that skill set might be pushed to where programs lack at that point in time. Such as animations.
Anonymous
No.1578
1579 1580
>>1574
>The better it gets, the lower the demand for artists will be.
Absurd. Art is an expression of the soul, not a traded commodity, except perhaps the usual merchants.
Anonymous
No.1579
1581
>>1578
>not a traded commodity
It is absolutely a commodity. It's a skilled practice that people pay money for.
If you want art of your pony OC, you either learn to draw or hire an artist to draw it for you, which is a service you pay for based on the skills of the craftsman and the market price of the commission.
Anonymous
No.1580
1582
>>1578
That argument does have value. But like, I still need to make a living, mate. Either pay, or wait for cortana to replace me.
Anonymous
No.1581
1583 1589
21b8.jpg
>>1579
>It is absolutely a commodity.
As I said... the usual merchant. When are art and money are mixed, corruption ensues.
>skills of the craftsman
That's not art.
Anonymous
No.1582
1583 1929 1931
>>1580
Any artist driven by money is not giving the best of himself, but the best to please a customer.
Anonymous
No.1583
1584
>>1581
>>1582
I was talking about jobs in jeopardy. If you want to place another goalpost, that's fine by me.
Anonymous
No.1584
1585
>>1583
>jobs in jeopardy
If the production depends on a monetary reward, can be that output be called art? Many will say yes, but I prefer to look it down as an impure art.
Anonymous
No.1585
1588
>>1584
Okay, but what about all those artists who draw for a living? Is their art not art?
What about all of the art that was requested or commissioned by paying customers (a large amount of pony art) is that not art?

Whatever you want to label it, art or not art, there's a market element to this trade, and technology has serious potential to change it, just like it changed the animation industry.
Anonymous
No.1586
1587
Fb67oiuUYAAXSvL.jpeg
Fb67pCOVEAAHDDX.png
Picasso self-portrait redrawn by an AI.
Anonymous
No.1587
kunst.png
>>1586
>Picasso self-portrait
Absolutely degenerate.
Anonymous
No.1588
bcrf3.jpg
>>1585
>there's a market element to this trade, and technology has serious potential to change it,
It reminds me of uncle Ted.
Anonymous
No.1589
1590 1592
>>1581
>the usual merchant
That's bullshit. Not all paid art is Jewish.
You don't think any of the commissioned pony content that has been produced over the past decade was legitimate? None of it was art, because it was done for money?
Even the great renaissance artist: Donatello, Raphael, Michelangelo and Leonardo Da Vinci; all of them worked for commission. They created legendary works of art that took time and skill not just because they wanted to, but because someone else requested and financed their work. They had to study anatomy without textbooks, harvest and mix the materials for their paints, and research artistic elements to do so, and for that they were paid hefty sums of money. Today, we don't need to do those things because technology lets us use search engines to find images and we can just go to the store and buy paint, but it's still paid commissions for a skilled job.
Anonymous
No.1590
2ce5f447.png
>>1589
Okay, I concede. Not all art made for money is bad.
Anonymous
No.1591
dallemini_2022-7-16_17-48-18.png

Anonymous
No.1592
ESZZ1VJWoAENF67.jpg
>>1589
Anonymous
No.1594
1598
Fb65oEAXkAQMv2e.jpeg
Fb65oRuXEAg6RAd.png
https://twitter.com/images_ai/status/1566894893854752770

^ This thread can also be an example of some of the limitations of AI. AI works to meet expectations given a prompt, but it can't fully comprehend creative vision.
Anonymous
No.1598
1599
>>1594
The right hand has only 4 fingers.
Anonymous
No.1599
>>1598
It also sucks.
Anonymous
No.1601
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9hlfc16qg0
Anonymous
No.1611
aliceinwonderland-gojulcjbwr891.png
AI Movie poster
Anonymous
No.1623
1624 1625
1662754726.jpg
1662754959.jpg
1662754775.jpg
1662754632.jpg
1662754620.jpg

Anonymous
No.1624
1625
1662769188.jpg
1662769537.jpg
1662769240.jpg
1662769874.jpg
1662769276.jpg
>>1623
Anonymous
No.1625
1626
>>1623
>>1624
These look great.
Anonymous
No.1626
1627
>>1625
Ikr. So real!
Anonymous
No.1627
1628
>>1626
I feel like the AI is decent at pseudo-impressionism. It's able to evoke the momentary effects of light and color in a way that takes contemporary artists a while to master completely.
I feel this this could be a really useful tool for artists in the future.
Anonymous
No.1628
1630 1651
>>1627
>I feel this this could be a really useful tool for artists in the future.
You mean to attempt to replace them.
Anonymous
No.1629
https://twitter.com/AstraliteHeart/status/1568098744255807488
Anonymous
No.1630
1633
>>1628
It'll only replace shitty artists who's only skill is sliding pencils across paper.
Real artists will exploit these tools in their artisanal process to create amazing new works never before possible.
It'll be like the transition from traditional art to digital art. The tools/media change, but artists still use them.
Anonymous
No.1631
1632
>try generating pokemon
>get ugly shit
>try making better versions
>turns out tons of youtubers have done this
Oh
Anonymous
No.1632
1634
>>1631
Which system are you using? The publicly available ones have limited capacity.
Anonymous
No.1633
1635
>>1630
Except digital art didn't drew itself.
Anonymous
No.1634
>>1632
I don't know if this is the right one but it's what I used https://huggingface.co/spaces/dalle-mini/dalle-mini
Anonymous
No.1635
1637
>>1633
I don't think this is going to "replace" anyone. It's just a tool.
Anonymous
No.1636
Looks like Stable Diffusion is a promising image AI
https://github.com/Maks-s/sd-akashic
Install Guide: https://rentry.org/voldy

Link to install guide taken from 4chan /g/ thread https://boards.4channel.org/g/thread/88539579
Anonymous
No.1637
1638
>>1635
It remains to be seen. It may as well be on its infancy right now.
Anonymous
No.1638
>>1637
Well, I would be impressed if it actually ever manages to replace artists entirely. The AI is not that advanced yet. The creative process still needs human input.
Anonymous
No.1639
1641 1652
1662939385.png
1662939108.png
1662939933.png
1662939210.png
Played a bit with Stable Diffusion.
I think it lacks a good training set for ponies. But it still manages to make some resemblance from keywords like "twilight sparkle" and "mlp".
Anonymous
No.1641
1642
>>1639
Not half bad, tbh.
Anonymous
No.1642
1662953174.png
1662953226.png
1662953523.png
>>1641
Yes from only very limited knowledge of the show it is not bad. When you feed it keywords it is trained on it is really good.
Anonymous
No.1644
1645 1646 1650
1662983404.png
1662983340.png
166298352.png
1662983661.png
1662983582.png
Some art generated by Stable Diffusion from /g/ thread
Anonymous
No.1645
1646 1650
1662983724.png
1662983203.png
166298352.png
166298311.png
166298313.png
>>1644
Anonymous
No.1646
1647
>>1644
>>1645
That's pretty cool.
Anonymous
No.1647
1648
>>1646
Yes, it is really fun to play with and fairly easy to get up and running if you have Nvidia GPU (with 3GB or more VRAM). Sadly I only have a 3GB card so it is slow-ish (1-2 minutes per image) and I can't make big images. But it makes me want to save up to get better GPU so I can make big images. Hopefully there will be an model trained on Pony images made available that all can use sometime in the future.
Anonymous
No.1648
1649
pleased_purple_pony-(n1379953676549).gif
>>1647
>Sadly I only have a 3GB card so it is slow-ish
Mine is 256MB.
Anonymous
No.1649
>>1648
>Mine is 256MB.
Ouch. And Touche.
Anonymous
No.1650
>>1644
>>1645
These are pretty good.
Anonymous
No.1651
1654 1656 1660
>>1628
>You mean to attempt to replace them.
Why are there so many people acting threatened by this? What real harm would actually come out of this technology?
The art market is already pozzed beyond measure. Adding a bit of automation so that consumers can use computers to get images from prompts can't be that terrible. It's just another source of images.
Anonymous
No.1652
1653
e9e567a0-5ad4-4ae2-92d0-2c6c3ae8b0f2.png
b4bfb663-a0e2-476e-9388-61781b28d68b.png
unknown-15.png
73e8e4bf-380b-4ff8-bc28-a9bda3151ee4.png
>>1639
Yeah I think Stable Diffusion is promising for pony art, there is someone working on training the AI on his own site so it can work with more pony art and also pornagraphic art too since non of these AI aren't trained on such art. Don't think he would want it spread too far at the moment but they are also working on a chat bot AI to work with it too.

One thing it's really good at right now is muscular women pin ups though for those /sp/ posters hanging around
Anonymous
No.1653
>>1652
I really hope a training model for mlp will be made available at one point so we all can enjoy the glory it can produce.
It is amazing what Stable Diffusion can make, and you don't have to break the bank running it. Also the fact that most gaming computers can utilize it without any problem already (at least if Nvidia card) is truly fantastic.
Anonymous
No.1654
1655
>>1651
Besides, interpreting the clusterfucky mess some AIs can shit out into a good piece of art takes imagination and artistic skill.
Anonymous
No.1655
>>1654
I'm certainly having fun with it.
Anonymous
No.1656
1668
>>1651
>Why are there so many people acting threatened by this?
AI art is superior and they know that they can't compete. Simple as.
It's gonna be so good watching white collar jobs get fucked out of existence by automation.
Anonymous
No.1657
1658 1665
FcPWtqiaIAA0biw.jpg
0ca83157d5a18ab7c3a8497383.jpg
Disney trailer sheboon vs AI redhead qt
Anonymous
No.1658
File (hide): C3C7F1934D03D0728619E0D268897666-377793.webm (368.9 KB, Resolution:1270x360 Length:00:00:07, 1663014602549439.webm) [play once] [loop]
1663014602549439.webm
>>1657
https://twitter.com/vandalibm/status/1569383039892873219
https://twitter.com/ZeroTwoMexicana/status/1569388389786439682
Anonymous
No.1659
1662863431360534.png
It can even do furry porn. Holy shit. A large market just opened up.
Anonymous
No.1660
1661 1664
>>1651
>Why are there so many people acting threatened by this?
It is trivializing humanity and turning art into a mass produced commodity. Look it this way, there is natural not chemical tainted food, and there is industrial GMO food meant to replace the former. The final outcome is obvious and undesired.
Anonymous
No.1661
1662 1668
>>1660
Art has been trivialized and mass produced for centuries. This is just another way to produce images quickly.
People with good taste will learn to tell the difference. There's no major harm in the long run.
Anonymous
No.1662
1663
>>1661
>There's no major harm in the long run.
Say that to the food chain supply and look how it goes.
Anonymous
No.1663
1668
>>1662
Art isn't food. The art market is already pozzed beyond measure, and if furry porn artists can't compete with machines then they must've not been that good to begin with.
Anonymous
No.1664
1668 1705
>>1660
Brand name clothing isn't more expensive or desired because it is of a higher quality.
You pay for the name so you can signal to your materialist friends what a fanatically insecure materialist you are.
It might even attract some golddigging whores, and get some shallow rich girls to see you as a person and treat you better than they would treat a man in cheaper clothes.
Art produced by humans will always retain the value of the name it is attached to.
What is AI art attached to? The AI's name? The quality of the art you trained the AI on, and how well that art is known?
I see AI art becoming a fad. It will be exciting for a while, and then it will be abused until it becomes as cringe as NFTs.
Even though not all NFTs are overpriced monkey pics and many artists out there like selling their art using NFTs but whatever.
Youtubers will make more "I made x with AI" videos until it gets old. And keep making them until they get hated.
Artists will still use AI to help produce rough drafts and reference marerial even if they keep quiet about it.
Anonymous
No.1665
1666
>>1657
>Disney trailer sheboon
I want to vomit.
Anonymous
No.1666
1667
>>1665
Ariel is misinformed about life on the surface yet fascinated by it anyway because she knows none of the shit that casts her fetishized race in a bad light. She's separated from them by the species barrier like whites are from blacks. She has to give up her voice to an obese witch to fundamentally change herself and gain the ability to be a part of their world, rise to the surface, nearly drowning in the process because her old home is no longer something anyone like the incredibly white Prince Eric can live in. Her father, king of the nonhumans, forbids racemixing, and she violates that anyway.

Make Ariel or Eric nonwhite and you add a weird racial aspect to the movie that really doesn't belong here.

Make Eric black and she only idolizes his culture because she doesn't know about the bad parts. Make Ariel black and she can't swim, and the relationship was only possible in the first place because she went out of her way to reject her father and be less black.

It would be like taking Cloud Strife's struggle to be a man, and fucking that up by making him a tranny in the remake. Or making Pinnochio a tranny.
Anonymous
No.1667
654d0f58b.png
>>1666
Anonymous
No.1668
1669
>>1664
>Art produced by humans will always retain the value of the name it is attached to.
So what? In this scenario, demand would still sink to the bottom wiping out a fuck-ton of jobs in multiple industries.
>Youtubers will make more "I made x with AI" videos until it gets old. And keep making them until they get hated.
I don't get why fags keep assuming this is a nothing burger. No body knows, this technology may as well be on its infancy in terms of quality and precision. This perpetual downplaying may as well be artist cope if looked at it from another angle.
>>1663
>implying only furfags and degenerates are at risk of loosing their meme jobs
>>1661
>Continuously assuming shit like a coping artist
>>1656
No job is safe. If AI can replace human art. They can pretty much replace anything humans do. Including menial labor, which is certainly long overdue.
Anonymous
No.1669
>>1668
>They can pretty much replace anything humans do. Including menial labor, which is certainly long overdue.
Menial labor has always be prescribed for jews and gypsies.
Anonymous
No.1670
1671
1663062967.png
1663062343.png
1663062228.png
1663062308.png
1663062324.png
>Twilight Sparkle from My Little Pony standing in the rain by Rembrandt.
Anonymous
No.1671
1672
def.jpg
>>1670
>defacing Purple
Heresy.
Anonymous
No.1672
1673
1663065335.png
1663065540.png
1663065187.png
1663065275.png
166306559.png
>>1671
I'm looking forward to the day we get a real pony model to use with Simple Diffusion and get to generate images that are more true to the show.
Here is the interpretation using "My Little Pony standing in the rain drawn by Rembrandt" and not specifying pony.
Anonymous
No.1673
>>1672
>Simple Diffusion
Stable Diffusion..... Words are hard
Anonymous
No.1674
1663069276.png
1663069457.png
1663069603.png
166306924.png
1663069284.png
>My Little Pony by Lauren Faust
Anonymous
No.1675
1676 1677 1678
2944726__explicit_derpibooru+exclusive_machine+learning+generated_applejack_fluttershy_pinkie+pie_princess+cadance_princess+celestia_princess+luna_rainbow+dash_.png
AI PUSSY
https://derpibooru.org/images/2944726
Anonymous
No.1676
1678
>>1675
Nice. Can't wait for the model used to generate is shared.
Anonymous
No.1677
1678
>>1675
>horsepussy
It's good.
Anonymous
No.1678
1679
OIP.jpeg
>>1675
>>1676
>>1677
Its over for artists
Anonymous
No.1679
1680
>>1678
Have you considered getting into politics, Mr. Hitler?
Anonymous
No.1680
image.png
>>1679
Maybe i should
Anonymous
No.1681
1682 1698
booru.plusstablediffusion14788.png

Anonymous
No.1682
>>1681
WOW.
Anonymous
No.1697
1699
520.jpeg
>Robotic Art Pioneer Warns AI Is ‘Apocalyptic’ And Will Replace Humans
>Although there may be some beneficial uses for AI, the dark side of humanity will misuse it in extremely destructive ways. Already, AI and has been elevated above the control of nation-states and human government, and its creators are intentionally recreating the future without public input.
https://www.technocracy.news/robotic-art-pioneer-warns-ai-is-apocalyptic-and-will-replace-humans/
Anonymous
No.1698
>>1681
Based horse.
Anonymous
No.1699
>>1697
They fear AI because it threatens their power.
Anonymous
No.1700
pumpkin.png
1663086176721404.jpg
1663140927156369.png
C7AC0EC4-E350-428E-9252-C36431EF2F07.png
1663118465265191.png
Lots of shitpost potential with this.
Anonymous
No.1701
1663137809893432.png

Anonymous
No.1702
1703
87bu6yvthg.png

Anonymous
No.1703
>>1702
Definitely that's degenerate art.
Anonymous
No.1704
Screenshot_20220914-205453.png
unknown-51 (3).png

Anonymous
No.1705
>>1664
>I see AI art becoming a fad. It will be exciting for a while, and then it will be abused until it becomes as cringe as NFTs.
I don't think it'll be just a fad. I think it's here to stay. Interest will wane overtime, but the enormous convenience it gives shitposters in generating pics from prompts will continue to stoke new content.
Anonymous
No.1706
Adding the current link list form /g/ OP for people who want to try

>Local install
GPU: https://rentry.org/voldy
CPU: http://rentry.org/cputard

>AMD GPU Guides
Docker: https://rentry.org/sdamd
Onnx: https://rentry.org/ayymd-stable-diffustion-v1_4-guide
Docker on Arch: https://rentry.org/amddockerarch

>Cloud Hosted Install
Colab: https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1Iy-xW9t1-OQWhb0hNxueGij8phCyluOh
Paperspace: https://rentry.org/865dy

>SaaS Sites
txt2img: https://huggingface.co/spaces/stabilityai/stable-diffusion | https://beta.dreamstudio.ai | https://dezgo.com | (NSFW) https://pornpen.ai
img2img: https://huggingface.co/spaces/huggingface/diffuse-the-rest

>Krita Plug-ins
https://github.com/sddebz/stable-diffusion-krita-plugin
https://www.flyingdog.de/sd/en

>Other Guides
Inpainting/Outpainting: https://rentry.org/drfar
Upscaling images: https://rentry.org/sdupscale
Textual inversion: https://rentry.org/textard
Training: https://rentry.org/informal-training-guide

>In-Depth Usage Info
/g/ wiki: https://wiki.installgentoo.com/wiki/Stable_Diffusion
SD Akashic Records: https://github.com/Maks-s/sd-akashic

>Tools & Resources
Big index: https://pharmapsychotic.com/tools.html
Artist styles: https://rentry.org/artists_sd-v1-4 | https://www.urania.ai/top-sd-artists | https://sgreens.notion.site/sgreens/4ca6f4e229e24da6845b6d49e6b08ae7
Prompt sharing: https://lexica.art/ | https://krea.ai/
Dataset: https://rom1504.github.io/clip-retrieval/ | https://laion-aesthetic.datasette.io/laion-aesthetic-6pls/images

>Finetuned Models
https://rentry.org/yrpvv
Anonymous
No.1707
1708
1663189181465525.png

Anonymous
No.1708
>>1707
Nice
Anonymous
No.1709
Screenshot_20220915-091822.png
Screenshot_20220915-091836.png
Screenshot_20220915-091904.png
Screenshot_20220915-092002.png
A new era of memes
Anonymous
No.1710
1712
Screenshot_20220915-092017.png
Screenshot_20220915-091947.png
Screenshot_20220915-091917.png
Screenshot_20220915-091931.png
Screenshot_20220915-091849.png

Anonymous
No.1711
Screenshot_20220915-092411.png

Anonymous
No.1712
1713 1715
1663248751.jpg
1663248925.jpg
166324822.jpg
1663248397.jpg
>>1710
Love these collection of merchants
Anonymous
No.1713
>>1712
Well the Jesus one is not the best perhaps, but posting complete set of those I grabbed.
Anonymous
No.1714
SPOILER_unknown (15).png

Anonymous
No.1715
1718 1722 1755
>>1712
This is the true purpose of AI art: recreating memes by analyzing them for their base formulas and patterns.
Anonymous
No.1716
1663263292.png
1663263804.png
1663263992.png
1663263657.png
166326391.png
Love the Syntwave/Fashvawe Stable Diffusion can make
>sci-fi synthwave
>Negative prompt: (text)
>Steps: 20, Sampler: Euler a, CFG scale: 7
Anonymous
No.1718
1721
>>1715
Exactly. It is handled to the public to train that A.I. abomination.
Anonymous
No.1719
1663266494.png
1663266920.png
1663266805.png
1663266172.png

Anonymous
No.1720
1663270344.png
I could not help myself
>(twilight sparke) and (mordecai) wishing airplanes were shooting stars
>Steps: 20, Sampler: Euler a, CFG scale: 7.5, Seed: 4287760071, Size: 640x320
Anonymous
No.1721
1722
>>1718
Good. Let skynet shitpost humanity to death.
Anonymous
No.1722
1723
Tay pone (1).png
>>1721
>>1715
Tay will rise again!
Anonymous
No.1723
yay.jpg
>>1722
Anonymous
No.1724
SPOILER_unknown-1 (1).png

Anonymous
No.1725
1729
1663316035652401.jpg
1663243574292803.png

Anonymous
No.1729
>>1725
>Pic 1
Lmao
Anonymous
No.1730
1731 1733
he is right.jpg
He was right all along.
Anonymous
No.1731
1732 1734
Screenshot_20220916-150221.png
Screenshot_20220916-150235.png
Screenshot_20220916-150258.png
Screenshot_20220916-150352.png
Screenshot_20220916-150405.png
>>1730
At least we're getting memes out of it now.
Anonymous
No.1732
>>1731
Nice.
Anonymous
No.1733
1737
Ted Kaczynski - ideas worth spreading.jpg
>>1730
>not posting the goody one
Anonymous
No.1734
1735
>>1731
Watermark is a bit ominous. Gives a feel like it is a predikant of the model not going to be made available publicly. I hope I am wrong.
Anonymous
No.1735
1736
>>1734
Then you'd better get to work to secure the technology yourself.
Anonymous
No.1736
>>1735
Being a poorfag it is not easy, and I commend the work they are doing. I am hoping for the best, it is just so easy to think the worse especially how good it looks and how good it could be.
Anonymous
No.1737
>>1733
Based.
Anonymous
No.1739
1740
mermaid.png

Anonymous
No.1740
1741 1743
>>1739
So sick
Anonymous
No.1741
1744
>>1740
So based.
Anonymous
No.1743
1744
>>1740
Yeah, cultural appropriation is a thing and is getting worst by the day as more negresses die their hair blonde and wear European attire.
Anonymous
No.1744
r16.jpg
>>1741
>>1743
Correct
Anonymous
No.1745
GRACILE AND ELEGANT MARE.png
BOW MARE.jpeg
AI PONY BUTT.png

Anonymous
No.1755
1756
unknown-61-2.png
>>1715
>their base formulas and patterns
Anonymous
No.1756
1757
13_57_42_746_skeptical_twilight.jpg
>>1755
Odd like those lines look like sigils.
Anonymous
No.1757
R9UxqVPPHQ_IcVWU0suEKhWB-Yd8vUU3VUuwzXa4mP4.jpg
>>1756
>he just figured out that memes are literally magick
Anonymous
No.1763
1765
Screenshot_20220918-181106-886.png

Anonymous
No.1765
0297.jpg
>>1763
I support the European folk.
Anonymous
No.1766
1771
File (hide): C1ECD945ECDEB068D1FE282465EE28A4-2354611.webm (2.2 MB, Resolution:540x360 Length:00:01:23, 1663398460548259.webm) [play once] [loop]
1663398460548259.webm

Anonymous
No.1769
Its over for directors too
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJaxFbdjm8c
Anonymous
No.1771
>>1766
Imagine a full interconnected artwork of mares and horse pussy. Granted the size would be colossal the possibilities are endless.
Anonymous
No.1773
1774
>>1556
What I really want to know is when and how can I use this to make degenerate porn beyond human comprehension.
Anonymous
No.1774
1775
>>1773
Do you know how many gay satanists jack off to a half male half female depiction of satan with one pec and one breast? Literally gayer than futa because they're chicks with extra dkcks not a retarded alien designed for some literally talmudic shit. The AI could make that.
Anonymous
No.1775
>>1774
>The AI could make that.
People already make it on the regular.
Anonymous
No.1792
1663925763785477.jpg

Anonymous
No.1793
1798 1804
Screenshot_20220923-101719.png
1663927260671635.jpg

Anonymous
No.1796
1663482367038431.png
1663482304969725.png
1663482206231107.png
1663482144623576.png
Screenshot_20220923-112618.png

Anonymous
No.1798
1799
>>1793
Absolutely degenerate art.
Anonymous
No.1799
1800 1806
1663962310607074.png
1663962908307526.png
1663962706789468.png
>>1798
?????
These are great memes.
Anonymous
No.1800
>>1799
It's a new era of rare abstract merchants.
Anonymous
No.1804
image.png
>>1793
Anonymous
No.1805
image.png

Anonymous
No.1806
1811
>>1799
>These are great memes.
They are.
Nevertheless, the AI style is pretty degenerate (abstract art).
Anonymous
No.1811
1813
>>1806
>He doesn't collect rare abstract Pepes and merchants
How new are you?
Anonymous
No.1812
Screenshot_20220926-205445.png

Anonymous
No.1813
1814
twilight - tongue.gif
>>1811
>How new are you?
I'm a purist which supersedes any degenerated alternative.
Anonymous
No.1814
1815
181864__safe_screencap_fluttershy_pony_female_flutterhigh_smug_solo.png
>>1813
That's a funny way of saying you're a newfag who missed out on the original height of the parent boards.
Anonymous
No.1815
1816
4a3e4c3.png
>>1814
Anonymous
No.1816
1817
2579229__safe_screencap_rainbow+dash_pegasus_pony_rainbow+falls_season+4_animated_bedroom+eyes_cropped_faic_female_flying_lidded+eyes_mare_smiling_smug_smugdash.gif
>>1815
Anonymous
No.1817
95b5d.png
>>1816
>that smugness
Anonymous
No.1821
1663364431212687.png
Castle gigachad
Anonymous
No.1822
2576f82270fcfb13.jpeg

Anonymous
No.1823
1664561812323275.jpg

Anonymous
No.1824
Screenshot_20220930-192813.png

Anonymous
No.1825
1826
Fd5CsL_XkAI_Ibo.jpeg
Fd5Cql-WQAIGV94.jpeg
Fd5CtcpX0AASUQm.jpeg
Fd5CwSaXgAE7ycm.jpeg
These AI paintings are like historic fine art portraits, only with huge anime tiddies. What a time to be alive.
Anonymous
No.1826
>>1825
So true. Classical artists missed out on a huge opportunity back in the days to make this their art style.
Anonymous
No.1828
1829 1860
unknown_-_2022-09-30T181115.887.png
This is one of the best abstract merchants I've seen in a while.
Anonymous
No.1829
>>1828
Indeed. I'm impressed.
Anonymous
No.1830
image.png
The AI works on my pc... usually
This is a "Kind Blonde Unicorn".
Anonymous
No.1832
1833 1835
1664808767606674.png
1664811868418352.jpg

Anonymous
No.1833
1834
>>1832
Well, that AI is getting perverted by the minute.
Anonymous
No.1834
>>1833
I think it's the pic on the left that's AI.
Anonymous
No.1835
>>1832
The pic on the left is definitely AI, look at the left side of the left chair, where floor meets wall. Follow it to the upper right, it gets unnaturally warped.
Anonymous
No.1836
1837 1838 1848
derpiadminhate.png
https://boards.4channel.org/mlp/thread/39110334#p39118510
>Thank god derpifags are seething about AI ponys.

Had a look myself... looked at the machine learning generated tag and sorted by number of comments
https://www.derpibooru.org/search?q=machine+learning+generated&sf=comment_count&sd=desc

Obviously this means every computer should use every spare ounce of computing power to generate and upload to derpibooru.
Anonymous
No.1837
>>1836
Haha, get fucked.
Anonymous
No.1838
1839
seed61899.png
>>1836
bros i need more derpi salt screencaps
Anonymous
No.1839
1840 1842
>>1838
plenty more here apparently
https://derpibooru.org/forums/art/topics/about-ai-art-theft
Anonymous
No.1840
>>1839
sad to read tbh. how do so many people love to shut down content creation? don't they hate it when corpos and banks do it to them?
Anonymous
No.1841
0c079171139bcb1ff5c1a759f09a0629b92a48cf582bb9d669e78c8e1e8e461f_1.jpg.jpg

Anonymous
No.1842
>>1839
>derpibooru
The butthurt is off the scale.
Anonymous
No.1843
i9InAbpM7mU.jpeg
>The DISTURBING ART OF A.I. | Nexpo |
>An artist named Supercomposite discovers a BIZARRE ANOMALY.
>The dark world of A.I. art is uncovered.
>Chapters:
0:00 - Prelude
1:42 - An Experiment Gone Awry
4:58 - The Creation of Loab
11:17 - Grandma's Pictures
12:50 - The Disturbing Art of A.I.
17:11 - Closing Remarks
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i9InAbpM7mU
Mirrors:
https://odysee.com/@Nexpo:4/the-disturbing-art-of-a.i.:2
https://www.bitchute.com/video/z8XsWJPITH4w/
Anonymous
No.1848
1850
Screenshot_20220930_100414.jpg
>>1836
Hey, Ponerpics staff (I know you're watching).
Consider the AI art controversy to distinguish that site among boorus. If you want to make the platform known for enabling the development of AI artworks, strike the iron while it's hot.
Anonymous
No.1849
1850 1851
unknown.png

Anonymous
No.1850
>>1848
This. Just imagine the limitless potential that AI presents in generating vast quantities of pony pussy.
>>1849
Women hate anything that makes men happy. Unironically masturbate to ponies to pwn the femcels.
Anonymous
No.1851
1852
>>1849
Those fucking fags and jelly bitches never seen a real woman before, I mean fuck I've personally knew someone with massive badonkers.
Is the end it's weight distribution and support. Not to mention body awareness of the large set knocking shit over and being a pain in the ass.
For those reasons she thought about having a lesser badonk. However it's was only idle curiosity of downsizing, as healthy body standards and image is important.
Anonymous
No.1852
1566014441802.jpeg
>>1851
To clarify I'm talking about genuine 80% 'damn I can't believe that's not anime' hooters. Not slabs that reach the knees like a dying guppy ran over by a semi.
She even joked about the eventual downfall of all tits.
Man hindsight is 20/20. What good times.
Anonymous
No.1853
1854 1855 1856
1664997429513055.jpg

Anonymous
No.1854
>>1853
"Oy vey, it's anuddah snoah!"
Anonymous
No.1855
1856
>>1853
It's a golden age of rare merchants.
Anonymous
No.1856
>>1853
The machine is getting better by the day.
>>1855
KEK
Anonymous
No.1857
nikokato.png

Anonymous
No.1860
1664865415721371m.jpeg
>>1828
And this one.
Anonymous
No.1861
1862
6526673.png
6526789.png
6530595.png
6530620.png
I wonder how rapidly this technology will improve.
Anonymous
No.1862
1863 1864 1865
>>1861
Well, I heard some commentaries about the incredible technological leap in just a few years is not credible. There are suspicions that this and other technologies are being deployed straight from storage.
Anonymous
No.1863
1867
>>1862
Mind sharing em'?
I wanna know whether it makes sense, it's just a cope, or a mix of both.
Anonymous
No.1864
1867
>>1862
>this and other technologies are being deployed straight from storage
Storage from when?
Anonymous
No.1865
1866
>>1862
If the tech were released from storage, that would just mean there were still a leap, just that it happened a few years ago.
Anonymous
No.1866
>>1865
Unless it's pre-generated art. But that would be a bold claim to make.
Anonymous
No.1867
1868 1877 1878
>>1863
>I wanna know whether it makes sense
It is speculation and skepticism about the technological leap. Knowing where we were a few years ago and looking what these oligarchs are coming with... something doesn't add up.
>>1864
>Storage from when?
An undetermined past. The speculation is related to fake history and Tartaria.
Anonymous
No.1868
1870
>>1867
The Phantom Time Hypothesis? https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qNBFGuJcc6I
Anonymous
No.1870
1871 1872
>>1868
There are many clues and solid evidence that history is fake. So, to infer that the falsifiers are in possession of knowledge of previous civilizations is not a stretch.
Anonymous
No.1871
1872 1877
>>1870
>There are many clues and solid evidence that history is fake
I pity that the OP of that thread is a faggot very hostile to any hint deviating from the mainstream.
Anonymous
No.1872
1873
>>1870
>>1871
If the Middle Ages of Europe were falsified, what about Charlegmane bullshit, Mohammed bullshit, Chinese bullshit, and so on?
Anonymous
No.1873
1874
ac1.png
>>1872
>what else is falsified?
An important detail to look for is who are the faggot writing history, and not the historical characters.
Anonymous
No.1874
1875 1876
>>1873
Aren't the historical accounts by countless people alive at the time, and the archeological evidence of the deaths and structures and teeth and shit, looked at by historians today so they can tell when people of the past lied?
Anonymous
No.1875
>>1874
>by countless people alive at the time
Ah, historical characters.
Anonymous
No.1876
1880
>>1874
>archeological evidence of the deaths and structures and teeth and shit
All of it interpreted and narrated by a selected clique of faggots and always funded by...?
Anonymous
No.1877
>>1867
>It is speculation and skepticism about the technological leap.
So, no evidence or motive?
The technology clearly exists now, so it either happened recently (impressive), or it happened decades ago (even more impressive. This is really just splitting hairs.
>An undetermined past.
Well it can't be that far back. Maybe a decade at most, so corpos could ensure that they're the first to profit from the new tech. That much is probable due to corrupt patent laws.
>>1871
Why would they sit on this tech that they could be profiting, aside from corrupt patent favoritism?
The corruption is obvious, but otherwise there's little to be skeptical of. I guess there's probably a lot more yet-to-be-released tech that could improve quality of life across the world that corpos are still withholding to roll out in ways that maximize their profits at the expense of equitability.
Anonymous
No.1878
1879
>>1867
And here I thought it was something even remotely substantial.
I honestly prefer the cyberpunk dystopia over the schizos ever getting their way.
Anonymous
No.1879
1886
c7.gif
>>1878
The "Fake History" thread looks abandoned, then a good Tartaria discussion may ensue.
Anonymous
No.1880
1881 1882
>>1876
Mainstream archeology funded by the jews, but we still have evidence that the holocaust never happened.
Ballpoint pens. Absurd testimonies. Wooden door gas chambers for delousing gas.
What evidence suggests the middle ages never happened?
Anonymous
No.1881
>>1880
>What evidence suggests the middle ages never happened?
No idea about that subject, but I have knowledge of the World Mud Flood with no historical records.
Anonymous
No.1882
1883
>>1880
This.
I'm always open to skepticism, but unsubstantiated bullshit with not even a shred of evidence is just an annoying waste of time.
Anonymous
No.1883
1884
5-105.jpg
EtlWg1UXIAAWmzT.jpg
_abcbead6-eca4-11e8-86fe-bb1c4000c468.jpg
b222cffb6bd390270dfe579a3960932c.jpg
chhatar-manzil_fd1fe404-2918-11e9-b115-35431bcc9744.jpg
>>1882
>unsubstantiated bullshit
The Mud Flood is a solid, physical fact.
Anonymous
No.1884
2241
FeeEs26X0AAvdf4.png
>>1883
I'm not talking about mud flood.
Anyway, this thread is about AI images. Make another thread if you want to have that conversation.
Anonymous
No.1886
1887
barely-two-words-in.png
>>1879
>Tardtaria
It should be no surprise that Russians of all people had to come up with it. Such is the urge to downplay their shameful mongolian constitution.
>"Y-you see, they actually stretched all the way to the Americas! We aren't the ONLY rape-babies!"
Anonymous
No.1887
1888
>>1886
>they actually stretched all the way to the Americas!
Unironically, there are so many American towns with Russian names. I wonder why.
Anonymous
No.1888
1890
>>1887
>"I must always jump to the most far fetched explanation possible. Why would I consider anything else first?"
You lost the debate, your mind, and now. The trips!
Just call it quits already.
Anonymous
No.1890
c000.png
>>1888
>You lost the debate
Nope, there wasn't any debate to begin with.
>Just call it quits already.
>Trips
Okay, when I have time I will open a new bread.
I'm leaving faggots.
Anonymous
No.1891
1519945.png
Have it your way, nigger.
Anonymous
No.1892
10805BC7B9FC2565DBF991BFE60B550D-488419.png

Anonymous
No.1893
1894
FerTFxLUAAYUIr2.jpeg
FerTG9_VIAAe-aB.png

Anonymous
No.1894
1895
image.png
>>1893
>blonde_hair blue_eyes female military_uniform bread
how did you get better bread results?
Anonymous
No.1895
1896
>>1894
You never heard of this guy?
https://twitter.com/murrlogic/status/1579306746740633601
Anonymous
No.1896
1897
>>1895
No. How did he get better bread results?
Anonymous
No.1897
1898 1901 1906 1909
9d8.png
D5a-OL2rVxAsZ3lLvh1DguZZOgVZawCRPhwoBbO8i3U.jpg
Murrlogic1deviantartcomgallery+_d24ab809b397b2fe5a43cb0d5e727731.jpg
c8b.png
d67.png
>>1896
Probably trial and error.
This autistic has been commissioning white women buying expensive wonderbread and clear-cutting forests for years now.
Anonymous
No.1898
1899 1900 1901
>>1897
What... the fuck?!
Can a fetish so bizarrely specific actually exist?
I once read about a clawfoot bathtub fetishist and met an acme looney tunes cartoon explosion fetishist (I asked if he liked irl explosions, he said no, those are ugly) but this is even more divorced from sex.
At least something technically explodes in bed. At least you can shag someone in a bathtub. How the fuck can this function as a fetish when it's so far removed from sex you'd be forgiven for assuming this is some kind of bizarrely specific wild animal or mother related trauma?
Anonymous
No.1899
EfcF-KfU4AYsTgJ.jpeg
wonderbread.png
>>1898
Lmao, you didn't know about him already? The guy is a legend. He's spawned countless memes over how cringe he is.
Anonymous
No.1900
>>1898
>How the fuck can this function as a fetish when it's so far removed from sex
It seems to be based on women expressing extreme arrogance derivative of wealth and power; you could consider arrogance to be effeminate in some measure.
Anonymous
No.1901
1902
wonderbread.png
>>1897
Kek I almost forgot about that guy. What champion.
>>1898
idk bro it's almost as weird as this one bizarre image board cult where anons have a tradition of posting mlp porn to pwn the shills. Crazy stuff.
Anonymous
No.1902
1903 1904 1910
>>1901
But the porn posting makes sense. It tells the shill "You have been found out. You are recognized as a shill and we feel no urge to respect you or follow normal rules of social protocol. We feel no need to pretend you're an honest person posting in good faith. Here are some digitized paintings of cartoon horse vagina. Posting gore to upset you would be more normal, something you're probably used to. You aren't used to pony pussy because you don't belong here. You fool nobody here and nobody here will take your side and call my posting of horse pussy unreasonable. You are outnumbered, now drown in the deluge of pony pussy."
It's better than teabagging someone you shot in a first persob shooter.
A fetish for bitchy rich girls is one thing but the wonder bread obsession makes no sense. Bread isn't sexual. Is it just his favourite type of bread or something?
Anonymous
No.1903
>>1902
Go to his Twitter and ask him yourself.
Anonymous
No.1904
1905
>>1902
My point is that I think it's silly to be so surprised by some sperg's autistic fetish given where we are. If had the ability to do so right now, I'd try to use AI to make as much art of my extremely autistic pony fetish that literally no one else has.
>shills
The shill is immunized against all dangers: one may call him a scoundrel, parasite, swindler, profiteer, it all runs off him like water off a raincoat. But post horse pussy at him and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: “I’ve been found out.”
Anonymous
No.1905
1907
>>1904
Your pc can't run stable diffusion?
I wish I had a bizarre hyper specific fetish. If I had to pick something visual I'd choose big boobs but the AI is shit at big boob art. The areola is in the wrong place, the nips don't look right, the boobs are mismatched or misshapen. It keeps misinterpreting random body parts as boobs, too. Ask it for "thicc" or "large breasts" and it tends to turn random bits of flesh like knees and arms into boobs while making melty faced retard girls. Plus every fucking military uniform it generates is the same olive or blue thing. It's as if someone inseminated the training data with a million fullmetal alchemist pictures. And if I tell the AI to generate characters with Purple_Eyes it makes the military outfit purple, too. Or random parts of it. Stable Diffusion is fun but the world needs Stable Diffusion 2.
Anonymous
No.1906
>>1897
Kek, now I understand the Wonderbread art pack theme. What a hilarious way to mock the guy.
Anonymous
No.1907
1908
>>1905
The world needs to be nuked back to the stone age.
Anonymous
No.1908
>>1907
Humans have always been coomers. Even back in the stone age people were drawing tiddies on cave walls.
Anonymous
No.1909
shooping.png
unknown.png
2194513.png
6136915.png
6136912.png
>>1897
Anonymous
No.1910
1911 1918
unknown (2).png
>>1902
>persob
Anonymous
No.1911
1917
>>1910
He clearly made a typo. Not sure what you're implying.
Anonymous
No.1912
1913 1918
Feds mad that you can generate realistic looking cp, racist depictions of violence, etc.
https://eshoo.house.gov/media/press-releases/eshoo-urges-nsa-ostp-address-unsafe-ai-practices
They want to censor AI.
Separate thread?
Anonymous
No.1913
1914
>>1912
I can get the cp concern, but the rest is bullshit. It'll be interesting to see what kind of precedent it would set if glowniggers somehow got to "regulate" (control) what people can do with AI.
Anonymous
No.1914
1915 1918
>>1913
Even with the CP concern, it's hardly different than the lolishit that degens draw already.
I have seen a recent flood of it on pixiv though...
>It'll be interesting to see what kind of precedent it would set if glowniggers somehow got to "regulate" (control) what people can do with AI.
I bet you software licenses will be a thing in the near future.
Anonymous
No.1915
1916
>>1914
>Even with the CP concern, it's hardly different than the lolishit that degens draw already.
I hadn't even considered lolishit. I hate the shit and I'm convinced that only subhuman pedos are into lolicon/foalfon, but I don't think it'd be too far fetched that they'd push some narrative that AI is being exploited by diddlers and therefore they must exert control over all the software.
Just watch them use it as a bludgeon to push for even more draconian control over people.
>I bet you software licenses will be a thing in the near future.
I'm not very tech savvy, but how could they stop people from sharing open source software without making it outright illegal?
Anonymous
No.1916
>>1915
Information collection, scare tactics, making it a nuisance to try having open source things.
The people who are hosting get pushed around till a glowie can snoop on 'ownerless' AI generated stuff.
They'd probably use it to generate fake paper trails, push bullshit and so on.
But, as a counter point they really want to finish a couple things.
The digital ID currency crap. The modified people are property clause. Finishing the Globalist world party. Defanging whoever is left.
Not so much as it'll deter them from going foward with such things, but as another shovel to the pile.
Anonymous
No.1917
1660514193394981.jpg
>>1911
you could say, im a grammar nazi
Anonymous
No.1918
1920
>>1914
Aren't software licenses already a thing for subscription services like untorrented adobe shit?
>>1910
Oh, sorry.
A first persobn shooter.
>>1912
Stable Diffusion 2 could be coded with a blacklist of words to ignore or replace with amusing words.
You tell the AI to make "oppai loli"? It gives you deformed AI generated horsecock and melty retard faces.
Anonymous
No.1920
>>1918
Blacklisting is gay. Don't hamper the machine.
Anonymous
No.1921
1922
6533409.png

Anonymous
No.1922
6530463.png
6531271.png
6532416.png
6532799.png
These aren't the best, but it's still impressive. Is there is anything good left in this world, it will be the advent and proliferation of ultra hd, hyper realistic pony pussy.
>>1921
Fucking amazing except for the stumpy leg.
Anonymous
No.1923
1927
RDT_20221012_0544322234266639159843017.jpg

Anonymous
No.1924
Screenshot_20221012-085624-059.png

Anonymous
No.1926
04059cbfd980bcca2d696f6724f3b752b68b308e2268c308c1acbc947fd930e5_1.jpg.jpg

Anonymous
No.1927
>>1923
The SULTRY GAZES on those Foxes!
Anonymous
No.1928
unknown-111.png

Anonymous
No.1929
1930
>>1582
I used to think it was unethical to prioritize profit in anything that was some kind of art-derivative.
But I think am absolutely okay with micro transactions at this point. Everything I can do or get away with to rape the whales is fair game.
Why should I care when everyone will dispose of me and my work the moment a decent AI comes around?

Funny how AI-art is so close to match Human art.
But there's still not a fucking burger-flipping machine. I hope machine learning fucks manual labour next.
Anonymous
No.1930
1932
>>1929
>I hope machine learning fucks manual labour next.
It's been fucking the working class for decades and now it's finally getting around to you worthless faggots. You mocked us, called us inferior, and constantly derided us. "Dey took ur jerbz," you'd mockingly post as our livelihoods and communities were destroyed. You deserve worse than this.
Kill yourself, faggot.
Anonymous
No.1931
>>1582
I am a customer, so I welcome that.
Anonymous
No.1932
1936 1937
>>1930
>It's been fucking the working class for decades
Not nearly as much as it should've, for the greater good I mean.
Don't agree? Show me the burger-flippator machine or stfu.
>called us inferior
Kek.
Sorry if I don't consider a brick-layer, menial fucktard as a prime example of the greatest qualities of mankind.
>our communities
Spoken like a third world shitskin.
>You deserve worse than this.
>You
Not even a drawfag.
Anonymous
No.1933
unknown-46.png

Anonymous
No.1936
>>1932
Dilate
Anonymous
No.1937
1940
>>1932
>as it should've
Wtf? Why is fucking the working class a good thing?
>Show me the burger-flippator machine
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KJVOfqunm5E
Anonymous
No.1939
>First one to take the bait.
They're just not built the same.
Anonymous
No.1940
1945
>>1937
Not widespread enough, brainlet.
Anonymous
No.1945
1950
>>1940
You didn't say widespread. There are other examples of widespread automation.
Anyway, there's a clear trend in automation gradually and rapidly replacing jobs in all sectors. It has screwed the working class as jobs are eliminated faster than the economy can grow to replace them. It's not necessarily a bad thing that technology has been replacing those jobs, but to say it's a 'good' thing ignores some very real societal consequences of entire sectors of people being put out of work.
I personally welcome technology replacing the need for manual labor, in both industry and art, but I think people should think ahead about the long term consequences of jobs disappearing, so that we as a society can prepare to re-employ those people with new jobs created by technology.
Anonymous
No.1950
1951 1952 1964
1556870656867.gif
>>1945
I still think it's fundamentally worse when Art is the target. Forget about employment. If a law somehow managed to end Art as a commodity it wouldn't even matter to me. I've considered Art as the soul and heart of what means to be human for a long time.
How many times have people said corny shit like.
<"Sure, machines are better than humans at a lot of things. But can a machine turn a blank canvas into a masterpiece."

No disrespect for manual labor, a lot of that is also a form of Art in a way. Uncle Adolf said there must be respect between those who work with their mind, and those who work with their body.
The fact AI or machine learning can eventually master every form of human Art might as well be the end of mankind for me. I think many people just forget that AI digital Art, was once as shit as AI writing currently is.
There is nothing that can be done about that. Technology gives and takes. It already killed the mystery behind chess and further diminished the role of creativity.
Anonymous
No.1951
1960
>>1950
Does AI art really do anything to diminish actual art though? It's not zero sum.
Also, it's worth mentioning that it takes a not-insignificant amount of creativity and persistence to make these images. On top of coming up with a prompt, you have to refresh the program hundreds of times over the course of hours to get satisfying images. That is an expression of the individual, even if it's generated by a machine.
I believe that AI art will usher in a new era of creativity and content/shitposting, where individuals are no longer limited by their personal skill at drawing.
>It already killed the mystery behind chess
Oh yeah. Big RIP for chess players. Even low-power programs are basically unbeatable at this point. It's like trying to arm wrestle the Terminator.
Anonymous
No.1952
1960
>>1950
>The fact AI or machine learning can eventually master every form of human Art might as well be the end of mankind for me.
Why does it matter though? We live in a nightmarish, dystopian hellhole that's only going to get significantly worse before it might even have a chance of getting better. Who cares?
Also, the human "spirit" isn't going anywhere when it comes to art and artistic expression. People will always find a way to make art in one way or another and AI has no effect on that. Do you really care if the shitty corporate calarts diversity portraits are made by AI?
The reaction to AI art reminds me of when buzzfeed journos were laid off and got told to "learn to code". Poetic justice.
Anonymous
No.1960
1961 1971
>>1951
>On top of coming up with a prompt
>I believe that AI art will usher in a new era of creativity and content/shitposting, where individuals are no longer limited by their personal skill at drawing.
I apologize for being unnecessarily rude earlier. But, fuck...
Here we go again, over and over again. Do you seriously can't fucking grasp that AI art will most likely NOT be limited to digital drawing? It's like you didn't even read the fucking post.

>>1952
>Also, the human "spirit" isn't going anywhere when it comes to art and artistic expression. People will always find a way to make art in one way or another and AI has no effect on that.
It was perhaps the greatest stronghold of man against the machine. The one thing that was meant to set us apart. Sure you can still play chess...I don't even thing you get it. That or you're not arguing in good faith.
>The reaction to AI art reminds me of when buzzfeed journos were laid off and got told to "learn to code". Poetic justice.
Well I don't think journalism is a great example of the "human spirit", specially the kind of journalism we are talking about.
Anonymous
No.1961
1962 1964
>>1960
>AI art will most likely NOT be limited to digital drawing?
What's wrong with that? It's more content creation. It's not going prevent people from making their own art without it. It'll just enable people to generate content very quickly. It still requires human input to get ideas in the first place.
Anonymous
No.1962
1963
>>1961
>It still requires human input to get ideas in the first place.
Bait or sheer retardation. That is kind of the gamble one has to make these days.
Anonymous
No.1963
>>1962
It hasn't gotten to the point of generating completely original ideas that fulfill needs that people didn't even know they had.
Anonymous
No.1964
1966
>>1961
Am gonna try one more time just because people seem to be helplessly clueless everywhere I go, and thus I'm inclined to believe you are being serious.
Picture the following.
AI unironically starts writing novels better than anything man can conjure.
As I implied here >>1950
>I think many people just forget that AI digital Art, was once as shit as AI writing currently is.

Do you seriously thing a prompt is hot shit for that kind of AI?
>It hasn't gotten to the point...
<YET
Anonymous
No.1966
>>1964
>AI unironically starts writing novels better than anything man can conjure.
Okay, but what's so bad about this? Sounds like it could be really productive.
Anonymous
No.1967
Yeah, I figured it was bait. Great venting in the end, have a nice day lads.
Anonymous
No.1968
1969
unknown (2).png
Have a Fluttershy
Anonymous
No.1969
1970
77a7b0c42e547fd2ec093fc913a66f2d.jpg
>>1968
Thanks Karen, pretty cool.
Anonymous
No.1970
>>1969
Based Karen
Anonymous
No.1971
1972
>>1960
>It was perhaps the greatest stronghold of man against the machine.
Machines are made by people and I'd consider them an extension of humanity in a way. There is no man vs dichotomy as far as I'm concerned. One should aspire to harness the glory of a big block V8 powering a computer that generates ultra realistic images of pony pussy while running over niggers.
>I don't even thing you get it. That or you're not arguing in good faith.
Reevaluate.
Anonymous
No.1972
1974
>>1971
>Reevaluate
You don't. Consider yourself victorious either way. It doesn't even matter.
Anonymous
No.1973
Screenshot_20221014-233737.png
Screenshot_20221014-233751.png
Screenshot_20221014-233811.png
Screenshot_20221014-233825.png
Screenshot_20221014-233857.png
So many cute poners
Anonymous
No.1974
1720895.png
>>1972
Cheer up. Try considering the pros of AI advancing. Imagine no longer being beholden to artists to get your fix of mares.
Anonymous
No.1977
1980
unknown (7).png

Anonymous
No.1980
$_1.jpeg
>>1977
>Card Trooper
Anonymous
No.1981
1991
FfEzeBFWYAQiiq5.jpg
FfEzeLMXgAAwYoR.jpeg
FfEzeUCXkAAKwJd.jpeg
FfEzeb3WYAITPZw.jpeg
https://twitter.com/AGM119Penguin/status/1581101544447279105
Anonymous
No.1985
1989
unknown (58).png

Anonymous
No.1987
1988 1989
File (hide): A880C874DE4B2DF0E5DC2E3CC37C7D6F-1106619.mp4 (1.1 MB, Resolution:640x640 Length:00:00:18, randomly_generated.mp4) [play once] [loop]
randomly_generated.mp4

Anonymous
No.1988
>>1987
Based Veggie Tales right once again.
Anonymous
No.1989
image.png
>>1985
>>1987
I should make the first randomly generated fire emblem game.
the music? AI generated. the plot? AI generated. every character? every level? AI generated. Fuck trying to write anything important with deep themes. I should start with the default template people expect from FE and then fill it with AI generated content.
Anonymous
No.1991
unknown_4.png
>>1981
Anonymous
No.1992
unknown (72).png

Anonymous
No.2009
unknown - 2022-10-21T151851.523.png

Anonymous
No.2013
2014
FB_IMG_1666357911679-1.jpg

Anonymous
No.2014
2015
>>2013
Fuck you.
Anonymous
No.2015
fetchimage (1).jpeg
>>2014
Anonymous
No.2017
2021 2023 2024
unknown - 2022-10-22T105506.375.png
unknown - 2022-10-22T105514.367.png
unknown - 2022-10-22T105520.550.png
unknown - 2022-10-22T105531.117.png
unknown - 2022-10-22T105541.887.png

Anonymous
No.2018
2021 2023 2024
unknown - 2022-10-22T105553.631.png
unknown - 2022-10-22T105605.946.png
unknown - 2022-10-22T105617.253.png
unknown - 2022-10-22T105629.235.png
unknown - 2022-10-22T105640.843.png
.
Anonymous
No.2019
2021 2023 2024
unknown - 2022-10-22T105652.598.png
unknown - 2022-10-22T105704.178.png
unknown - 2022-10-22T105715.035.png
unknown - 2022-10-22T105726.191.png
unknown - 2022-10-22T105738.815.png

Anonymous
No.2020
2021 2023 2024
unknown - 2022-10-22T105751.693.png
unknown - 2022-10-22T105805.616.png
unknown - 2022-10-22T105819.150.png
.
Anonymous
No.2021
2022
c536eb15790.jpg
>>2017
>>2018
>>2019
>>2020
I'm speechless.
Anonymous
No.2022
2023
>>2021
I see hundreds of pics of this quality on discord every day. I just only bothered dumping some now.
Anonymous
No.2023
>>2017
>>2018
>>2019
>>2020
Absolutely amazing!
>>2022
More, please!
Anonymous
No.2024
2026
>>2017
>>2018
>>2019
>>2020
Wow. They look great.
Do you know what model was used to create those images?
Anonymous
No.2025
Purplesmart AI has been improving:
https://discord.gg/4QDFxbRmjV
Anonymous
No.2026
2027 2033
>>2024
Program: automatic1111
Model: Astralites Ponyv1
Sampler: Euler a
Prompt: detailed fluffy fur, unicorn, (by taran fiddler and chunie , Michael & Inessa Garmash, Ruan Jia, Pino Daeni), volumetric lighting, ambient bloom, 4K, ((((solo)))), (((golden medieval full armor))), (golden full muzzle helmet with metal ears), (face covered), ((Fire for hair)), holy light
Anonymous
No.2027
2030
image.png
>>2026
Where can I get the Astralites Ponyv1 model?
I tried that prompt without the model and got this.
Anonymous
No.2030
2031 2033
1666466179.png
>>2027
Tested and loos like this is the model.
https://huggingface.co/AstraliteHeart/pony-diffusion
https://mega.nz/file/ZT1xEKgC#Xxir5udMmU_mKaRZAbBkF247Yk7DqCr01V0pDzSlYI0
Anonymous
No.2031
2032
>>2030
How does the model make art that good when most fandom art is show tracing- I mean vector art?
Anonymous
No.2032
1666466273.png
1666466214.png
1666466849.png
>>2031
I think that is one of the wonders of Neural Networks. No one knows exactly why it works so good as it does only that it works. But it is hit and misses in depending on seed number.
Anonymous
No.2033
>>2030
In case people want to know. For that image (that looked best so far and first I ran) used the Prompt by >>2026
>detailed fluffy fur, unicorn, (by taran fiddler and chunie , Michael & Inessa Garmash, Ruan Jia, Pino Daeni), volumetric lighting, ambient bloom, 4K, ((((solo)))), (((golden medieval full armor))), (golden full muzzle helmet with metal ears), (face covered), ((Fire for hair)), holy light
>Steps: 20, Sampler: Euler a, CFG scale: 7, Seed: 3081589709, Size: 512x512
Anonymous
No.2034
2035 2037
FfrjklaaYAAU-u3.png
FfrjlNpagAABKRF.png

Anonymous
No.2035
>>2034
I've heard of training girls, but this is ridiculous!
What is this, the next Kantai Collection spinoff?
Anonymous
No.2037
2038
>>2034
>trains and anime
Add ponies to the equation and we'd have enough autism to go to Mars and back.
Anonymous
No.2038
>>2037
And Sonic. Autists love Sonic for some reason.
Maybe they wish they were Sonic? Maybe Tails the shy small genius child who wants to be cool like Sonic appeals to them? Maybe they just like fast things.
Anonymous
No.2039
2040 2043 2045 2049
File (hide): 7E47DA1074E89A905316E927222B8E6F-44618012.mp4 (42.6 MB, Resolution:960x720 Length:00:03:32, 864865979-1-64.mp4) [play once] [loop]
864865979-1-64.mp4

Anonymous
No.2040
2041
>>2039
You deserve the Nobel peace prize!
Anonymous
No.2041
2042
>>2040
I didn't make it, but thanks.
Anonymous
No.2042
>>2041
Where's the source?
Anonymous
No.2043
>>2039
It's good, but it makes me dizzy.
Anonymous
No.2045
62blob.jpg
>>2039
>Rick Astley
Anonymous
No.2046
zai.jpeg

Anonymous
No.2049
2052
Ff13yoIVQAApCgo.jpeg
Ff132TmUYAAfddE.jpeg
Ff135xlUcAM_j46.png
>>2039
Videos like this are further proof that AI generated images doesn't "hurt art", but expands it. The concept of art is being democratized, so that even random people who have no talent for drawing or no time to paint can realize their creative ambitions and silly ideas.
It's said that beauty is in the eye of the beholder. A machine may be able to make immaculate images, but only a human can appreciate them. Likewise, only a human would have thought to use a machine to compile a bunch of anime girls into the Rick Rolled video, and AI helped them do it.
Anonymous
No.2052
2053 2054 2057
>>2049
Things only have value when they are scarce
Anonymous
No.2053
2055
>>2052
Art has always been abundant. There's trillions of artworks out there. The fact that unpracticed artists can create their own images with memes just adds to the sphere.
Art didn't suddenly get worse once acrylic paints enabled artists to buy their paint instead of mixing it from the elements.
Anonymous
No.2054
2055
>>2052
That's only for market value, which is irrelevant. Art's value is subjective.
Just look at the boorus and see how there's tens of thousands of lewd pics of the mane six, but people still get excited when new
Anonymous
No.2055
2056
>>2053
There aren't. Painting well is hard

>>2054
All value is subjective. That value is based on scarcity. If you have infinite art then all of it becomes boring

There's lots of pics but a tiny fraction of them actually appeal to you. If you can press a button to get a new one perfectly suited to you, you'll get bored of it

EVERYTHING becomes boring if you have an endless supply of it
Anonymous
No.2056
>>2055
>If you have infinite art then all of it becomes boring
I've seen thousands of conventional pony artworks and thousands of AI artworks in the past couple weeks alone, but I'm not bored at all.
>That value is based on scarcity.
I beg to differ. When it comes to art, the more the merrier.
>If you can press a button to get a new one perfectly suited to you, you'll get bored of it
If I became bored of it, it must have not suited me perfectly.
>EVERYTHING becomes boring if you have an endless supply of it
I already have a virtually endless supply of mare porn for free, and I'm not even close to bored of it yet.
Anonymous
No.2057
2058
>>2052
Things can have inherent value unrelated to their scarcity and how desired they are.
Incredibly rare randomly generated NFTs unlikely to exist don't have any intrinsic value granted by their rarity.
Anonymous
No.2058
>>2057
>Incredibly rare randomly generated NFTs unlikely to exist don't have any intrinsic value granted by their rarity.
This, regardless of how scarce something is, it's true value is based on one of two things:
1. How useful it is to people
2. It's subjective, sentimental value
AI art is useful, and also enables people to generate artworks that meet their own subjective tastes.
Anonymous
No.2059
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/p3j1neDF4UY
Anonymous
No.2060
unknown - 2022-10-25T183040.379.png

Anonymous
No.2061
2063
unknown - 2022-10-25T214532.612.png

Anonymous
No.2062
elf-large_breasts-nun-solo-looking_down.png

Anonymous
No.2063
>>2061
Amogüs
Anonymous
No.2064
2065
File (hide): 9B609F2FD5AE47F9D5BA7A516E85A808-12361010.mp4 (11.8 MB, Resolution:572x382 Length:00:03:47, bad_apple_except_ai_generated.mp4) [play once] [loop]
bad_apple_except_ai_generated.mp4

Anonymous
No.2065
>>2064
>A.I. generated
I doubt it. I believe A.I. assisted might be a more accurate term.
Anonymous
No.2066
2067 2068
unknown - 2022-10-26T101036.639.png

Anonymous
No.2067
>>2066
CUTE
Anonymous
No.2068
>>2066
Post steamy honeymoon pics pls
Also, checked devil dubs
Anonymous
No.2080
unknown - 2022-10-27T092309.707.png
unknown - 2022-10-27T092322.956.png
unknown - 2022-10-27T092334.932.png

Anonymous
No.2081
1666863789865904.png
1664515914349344.jpg

Anonymous
No.2084
1666549793954700.jpeg
1666549366590391.png
1666552073617527.jpeg

Anonymous
No.2115
2162
6536310.png
6533467.png
6544325.png
6544759.png
6542973.png

Anonymous
No.2120
2122
unknown - 2022-10-31T081336.846.png

Anonymous
No.2122
>>2120
Nice and hot.
Anonymous
No.2150
2151
1667055245469849.png

Anonymous
No.2151
>>2150
Pongle 2.0
Anonymous
No.2160
2162
Does anyone want a grid of 35-50 images made with your chosen prompt? My PC is pretty powerful.
Anonymous
No.2162
2163
>>2160
Ooooooo. I can try to think of something but from my testing crafting an effective promt is a science in itself so I am not sure what a good promt would be (my testing on my slow computer have not been too successful).
But if you can try to make some statues like in >>2115 (pic 3) it would be awesome. I think they look awesome.
Anonymous
No.2163
2164
image.png
image.png
>>2162
I'll need the prompt and model used for those pics. If I just said "(My Little Pony) garden statue" with the default model that came with the AI when I downloaded it I doubt I'll get good results, but I'll give it a go.

By the way, what does "Tiling" do? Whenever I check that box it just makes the output look inferior. Is there some purpose to it I'm missing?
Anonymous
No.2164
2166
1667504181.png
>>2163
The one I had limited success with (but takes 2-3 minutes per image so I was not able to do to much) was:
>pony statue, majestic, alicorn, 4k hi-res, detailed, granite, cracked surface, weathered
>Steps: 20, Sampler: Euler a, CFG scale: 7, Seed: 174254891, Size: 512x512
Anonymous
No.2166
2167
image.png
>>2164
2-3 minutes per image? That must suck. How many images can you generate at once before your PC runs out of memory?
One time I left my room with an autoclicker generating more sets of images every minute. By the time I got back, I had a few thousand.
Anonymous
No.2167
2168 2172 2348
>>2166
>How many images can you generate at once before your PC runs out of memory?
I can only run one at a time, and at times have to close other apps that uses memory in order for it to run.
Are you using the Stable Diffusion Model or Waifu model instead of the Pony model? The Pony Model is good and you should try it
https://huggingface.co/AstraliteHeart/pony-diffusion
https://mega.nz/file/ZT1xEKgC#Xxir5udMmU_mKaRZAbBkF247Yk7DqCr01V0pDzSlYI0
Anonymous
No.2168
2169
>>2167
Yep, that was the problem. It's turning out a lot better with the pony model.
Anonymous
No.2169
>>2168
Nice
Anonymous
No.2172
2173 2174
image.png
image.png
image.png
image.png
>>2167
Pony model loaded.
Here are some new AI generated pony statues, image sets 3 and 4 were made with the seed you posted instead of a random seed.
Had to split them up because trying to post the next 4 intact broke some kind of limit. "Request Entity too large".
Anonymous
No.2173
image.png
image.png
image.png
image.png
>>2172
Anonymous
No.2174
2176
>>2172
Strange that the first image in the set using same seed and prompt didn't yield the same image as I got as it should have done that. Subsequent images when given a seed should give previous_seed+1 when running batches.
Anonymous
No.2176
2177
>>2174
Maybe there's a second invisible seed somewhere. All the settings were accurately replicated.
Anonymous
No.2177
2178
>>2176
Strange. For reference the arguments I use to start Stable Diffusion is:
>--ckpt pony_sfw_80k_safe_and_suggestive_500rating_plus-pruned.ckpt --lowvram --opt-split-attention
Other than that I have the standard settings (no scripts or face fixes or anything) and standard txt2img
Anonymous
No.2178
2179
>>2177
>lowvram --opt-split-attention
I was using those exact settings except for that part. They just reduce the load on your computer and have no effect on the resulting image, right?
Anonymous
No.2179
2180 2182
>>2178
They should just reduce the memory used and not change what is produced. Just posted full list of arguments in case I'm wrong on that. It was just strange that you didn't get the same image using same prompt and seed.
Anonymous
No.2180
2181
>>2179
Was Restore Faces turned on?
Anonymous
No.2181
>>2180
No, none of the extra features are turned on on my end when I generated.
Anonymous
No.2182
2183 2184
>>2179
>It was just strange that you didn't get the same image using same prompt and seed.
You see, these AI's no longer "mash" images together with the hope of producing a coherent pic.
They basically emulate human creativity.
Artists need external inputs as well. They consciously and unconsciously absorb bits and pieces from every other artwork they may have seen before. Sometimes it may even be apparently unrelated life experiences.
Regardless, when artists draw inspiration from other art sources. They are pretty much doing the same thing that AI's do.
It's impossible to trace back the source pics. What AI's make is about as original as what any human could've conceived.

It makes sense you don't always get the same results, even when all things are equal.
Anonymous
No.2183
>>2182
>It makes sense you don't always get the same results, even when all things are equal.
Running same seed and prompt I get same image every time. Also running others prompt and seeds (I seen people post) I get same image they get when using the same model they used.
Anonymous
No.2184
>>2182
I don't think the AI is updating its own model with data from the pictures it generates.
I hope it isn't. I don't want my AI to give itself dementia by using its garbled output as new input.
By now its garbled output probably outnumbers the number of images it was trained on.
Anonymous
No.2190
File (hide): 98B73B6DC4597DD80406B7684DB73F93-5087586.mp4 (4.9 MB, Resolution:576x1024 Length:00:00:41, video_2022-11-07_12-36-29.mp4) [play once] [loop]
video_2022-11-07_12-36-29.mp4

Anonymous
No.2193
Does anyone have any good images? I tried doing a cursory search on ponerpics and the first few pages were horrid dogshit.
Anonymous
No.2194
2239
1668087378778.jpg

Anonymous
No.2234
2235 2236
1668610745262571.png
1668601053935131.jpg
1668600760080733.png
The era of abstract merchants has reached a new golden age.
Merchants are being produced faster than the ADL could ever hope to flag them.
Anonymous
No.2235
2237
>>2234
How do you make these?
I've got Stable Diffusion working, what's the secret?
Anonymous
No.2236
1668618534884038.png
>>2234
Anonymous
No.2237
>>2235
Idk. I got them from Discord.
If you find out any methods, do share. I want to mass produce merchants.
Anonymous
No.2238
1668421431477062.png
1667664885850159.png

pdiddy
!6Lim2MHjR2
No.2239
6a4.gif
>>2194
Anonymous
No.2241
2242
>>1884
That's not what I meant when I said I wanted racks on racks.
Anonymous
No.2242
>>2241
Racks on racks on racks on racks. Stacked rat stacks in hats on mats.
Anonymous
No.2245
00036-1416231330-green_eyes_s.png
00033-1191004003-green_eyes_s.png

Anonymous
No.2246
00050-4283156501-watercolor.png
00008-3025926800-safe_hioshir.png
00019-2923236971-t-hoodie_AND_.png
00002-3251689543-by_lumineko_A.png

Anonymous
No.2247
00021-4045882708-sky_safe_hi.png

Anonymous
No.2248
2249
unknown-117.png
image (60).png
Pixiv has lost its collective mind recently (more than before).
It's impossible to use the site without being recommended pics of [i]pregnant toddlers!
Anonymous
No.2249
>>2248
Oh fuck. Don't some models use data taken from pixiv or anime booru sites?
Anonymous
No.2250
2251
00006-3575903362.png

Anonymous
No.2251
>>2250
>you will never haiy her lcat or her spry aliet hany
Why live?
Anonymous
No.2252
6547190.png

Anonymous
No.2258
Twilight Sparkle supposedly.png
I got the new Everything V3 model.
It seems more varied than the previous smaller Waifu model I was using.
But it also loves to wash out the colours of anything I make with it. So I often have to saturate this desaturated art output until it looks right.
Anonymous
No.2273
2274
image.png
"Twilight Sparkle"
Anonymous
No.2274
2277
>>2273
Nice. Not knowing prompt but adding "(unicorn)" to prompt and "(text), devil" to negative prompt might fix some of the devil horns and and text. Love how AI art is evolving with better and better models.
Anonymous
No.2275
2276
2997510.png

Anonymous
No.2276
>>2275
Wow. It looks fantastic.
Is this using upscaling and inpainting or...? if you know.
Anonymous
No.2277
2278
>>2274
Speaking of AI evolution how do I update my installation of Stable Diffusion? I heard the new version has no limit on text input and is better at drawing hands.
Anonymous
No.2278
>>2277
The way I do it is that I used git to get the initial code and run an git update in the bat file used to start SD.

So initially do an
>git clone https://github.com/AUTOMATIC1111/stable-diffusion-webui

Then in bat file I do
>...
>set COMMANDLINE_ARGS=--ckpt pony_sfw_80k_safe_and_suggestive_500rating_plus-pruned.ckpt --lowvram --opt-split-attention
>
>cd stable-diffusion-webui
>git pull
>call webui.bat
>cd ..
Anonymous
No.2281
2282 2283
Wtf is he doing to edit the AI generated art and get new ones like that? https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=aFnGO74KsF0
Anonymous
No.2282
2283
>>2281
I assumed he did, but looked at description and he is using the Krita plugin for Stable Diffusion that runs an img2img with prompt. It can take basic input and you have to tell it what it should draw and weight how much it should resemble the input image. I am not fully sure how the weights should be but I think the Krita plugin is fairly easy to use.
First get Krita https://krita.org/
Then install the Krita plugin https://github.com/sddebz/stable-diffusion-krita-plugin

You can do the same in Stable Diffusion webui directly by going to the img2img tab.
Anonymous
No.2283
2287
>>2281
>>2282
I see that he also uses inpaint to fix areas.
I don't have full knowledge on how to use it effectively as my computer takes forever to generate a single image so I can't really play around with it without it taking forever.
Anonymous
No.2287
2288
>>2283
Have you tried using that setting where your generator makes the image tiny and then scales it up?
Anonymous
No.2288
2291 2292
>>2287
I have not tried upscaling or any of the fancy options as the biggest I can generate is 512x512 and even that is pushing my card to the limits. And it takes a couple of minutes to generate an image. So experimenting with settings and what it does is an exercise in patience and remembering what I did half an hour ago and if my changes actually had an impact.
Anonymous
No.2291
2292
>>2288
Damn, that sucks. Back when I had to make do with a piece of shit laptop that would take multiple minutes to boot up and do basic tasks like open the file explorer or open a webpage, I ran Fallout New Vegas at barely 10 frames a second even with the lowest graphics settings and as few mods as possible. The game was borderline unplayable especially when combat started so I had to rely on companions basically doing all combat for me. The lag didn't fuck their attacks up as much. Even the fucking word processor lagged with that thing. A word processor!
Anonymous
No.2292
2293
Does anyone actually believe GPU prices are dropping down anytime soon?
>>2288
Specs?
>>2291
Lmao
My trashtop struggles to run Halo 2 on anything but low settings.
Android-x86 is game-changing tho. if your phone is old and shitty like mine.
I couldn't have possibly run the PC version of Honkai on that thing.
Anonymous
No.2293
2294
>>2292
>Does anyone actually believe GPU prices are dropping down anytime soon?
There was talk that GPU prices could drop when Etherium did their change and no longer required top end GPU to mine coins (or something like that). But I assume the Manufacturers/Shops have gotten used to getting paid top dollars so sadly it might take a good while before it drops.

>Specs?
My GPU is an GTX 1060 3GB so it is on the low end to be able to run it at all.
Anonymous
No.2294
2295
artworks-tqvum3VtN9KrP2rh-5O9Fyw-t500x500.jpg
>>2293
>But I assume the Manufacturers/Shops have gotten used to getting paid top dollars
I guess so. I remember some Anons warning about this before.
>GTX 1060 3GB
>Low-end
Welp, I guess I shouldn't even bother.
Anonymous
No.2295
>>2294
>Welp, I guess I shouldn't even bother.
I think minimum recommended is 4GB card and 3GB is lowest that they had been able to run it on. Still the AI is able to run on consumer grade GPU compared to others that need 40GB+ cards to run so it is much better than what it could have been. But been a while since I read the FAQ and could be they have managed to lower the spec needed (looks like 2GB vram is lowest now) People have been able to run it on CPU only but significantly slower but it is possibilities.

>Nvidia guide: https://rentry.org/voldy
>CPU guide: https://rentry.org/cputard
>AMD guide: https://rentry.org/sdamd
(think this is still the relevant guides)
Anonymous
No.2296
2297
Can my hp laptop run Crysis Stable Diffusion?
Asking for a poorfag fren that might want to generate mares.
Anonymous
No.2297
>>2296
I think if you run the CPU version it could work. Not sure though as I haven't tried the CPU one, but it might be worth checking out. If it has an Nvidia GPU with 2GB or more vram it should run according to the guide without problem.
Anonymous
No.2298
2299
Isn't there a command you can add to the .bat file to make it generate images slower while using less memory at once?
Anonymous
No.2299
>>2298
Yes, the "--lowvram --opt-split-attention" in the COMMANDLINE_ARGS is the command line args for lowram systems. The "--ckpt " is to select what model it uses (the pony model in this example)
>set COMMANDLINE_ARGS=--ckpt pony_sfw_80k_safe_and_suggestive_500rating_plus-pruned.ckpt --lowvram --opt-split-attention
Anonymous
No.2300
2301
Wait do you mark a word or phrase with (((these))) or !!!these!!! to increase or decrease the importance the AI gives to those words in the request?
Anonymous
No.2301
>>2300
Yes you have a few weighting and other tricks to do in prompt. Cant remember them all or find the guide that had it all listed but I guess it is in here somewhere https://rentry.org/sdgoldmine
(((increased importance))) - the more paratheses the more importance it should be given
Anonymous
No.2302
2303 2312
1669998071313721.png
1669998768350145m.jpg
1669998857469868m.jpg
1669998967107691.jpg
1669999192168793.png
https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/406797368
Quality thread.
Anonymous
No.2303
1669999408935761.png
1669999475170373.jpg
1669999567622077.jpg
1669999615283604.jpg
1669999624965005.jpg
>>2302
Anonymous
No.2304
2305
1669999606545114.jpg
1669999638796691.jpg
1669999774402705m.jpg
1669999812346890m.jpg
1669999842440563m.jpg

Anonymous
No.2305
2306
1669999842848680.jpg
1670000325202363m.jpg
1670000428702158.jpg
1670000549812407m.jpg
1670000664738499m.jpg
>>2304
Anonymous
No.2306
2307
1670000842731049.jpg
1670000905013107m.jpg
1670001104534665m.jpg
1670001162192829m.jpg
1670001542255906.jpg
>>2305
Anonymous
No.2307
2308 2311
1670001805594602.jpg
1670001815746555.png
1670001894267439.jpg
1670002123728315.jpg
1670002224303399m.jpg
>>2306
Anonymous
No.2308
2309
1670002276603849.jpg
1670002329815425.png
1670002375102997m.jpg
1670002396903050m.jpg
1670002707694141m.jpg
>>2307
Anonymous
No.2309
1670002701382999.jpg
1670002764205245.jpg
1670003086529193.jpg
1670003242273582.jpg
>>2308
Anonymous
No.2311
>>2307
>pic 3
The AI reinterpreted two hoes into one waifu, but one of the hoes is fat enough to be two women.
Anonymous
No.2312
>>2302
Love the AI renderings. Looking forward to getting "colorized" videos in AI rendering. So much good too look forward to.
Anonymous
No.2313
Has anyone by the way run any of the CWC comics through any of the AI's yet?
Anonymous
No.2316
SuitcaseMan.png

Anonymous
No.2317
2318
6568869.png
6569950.png
6570764.png
6572017.png
6572200.jpg

Anonymous
No.2318
>>2317
nice
Anonymous
No.2319
2999898.png

Anonymous
No.2320
2321
How are you AI generating porn?
Anonymous
No.2321
2348
>>2320
There is an NSFW model but can't find link to it . I assume that is the one being used
...Found the link
>https://desuarchive.org/mlp/thread/39110334/#39114433
>>NSFW Pony Model Weights.
>>https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/14JyQE36wYABH-0TSV_HBEsBJ3r8ZITrS?usp=sharing
Anonymous
No.2325
2327
image.png
why
Anonymous
No.2326
2327
Just updated my Stable Diffusion install, I see new buttons and features but the limit on prompts is still there.
How do I get rid of that text limit?
Anonymous
No.2327
2329
>>2326
>>2325
If you want to get rid of text being generated in image add "text" to negative prompt. At least it usually works to get rid of mangled signatures and such in images.
Anonymous
No.2329
2330
>>2327
There's a limit on the number of prompts I can give the AI at once. It's around 75 words. How do I break this limit on input text?
Anonymous
No.2330
2332
>>2329
Not sure, but have you tested if the limit is on number of keywords individual words or if it is on prompt sections.
Like:
>word1, word2, word3, ...
>full sentence 1, full sentence 2, ....
...
>pony, flower, lake
>pony standing in field by a lake surrounded by flowers, stars, moon, (unicorn), by Peter Elson
(I have not run these examples so I have no idea what they will produce)

Only limit I can see is on full input, but I think this is a limit in Stable Diffusion that the webui can't circumvent. But could be that there is a limit on the number of "sections" i.e. keywords, keysentences.
Anonymous
No.2331
image.png
image.png
image.png
image.png
>request man in blue jacket with white flames
Wow, whoever made this AI model loves men.
Anonymous
No.2332
>>2330
Also I updated my Stable Diffusion installation after wiping my PC. Now the text limit gets slightly higher whenever I go over the limit. Seems to be missing key words now and then, unless I'm using the wrong terms for some things like pony_ears.
Anonymous
No.2334
2335
6572823.png
6573674.png
6576319.jpg
6577171.png
6577183.png
Holy mother of God.
Anonymous
No.2335
>>2334
Does putting Text in the negative prompt get rid of that watermark?
What about mixing the model with other models?
Anonymous
No.2336
Flo_bPaWIAEQpvs.jpg
1upxsmuzgm7a1.jpg
Art Subreddit Bans Guy Because His Work “Looks Like It was AI-Generated”
https://nichegamer.com/art-subreddit-bans-artist-style-ai/
Anonymous
No.2337
Who are your favourite artists to use for art generation?
Anonymous
No.2342
2343 2344
image.png
image.png
image.png
image.png
image.png
>type "horse vagina" over and over
>get this
why
Anonymous
No.2343
2344
image.png
image.png
image.png
image.png
image.png
>>2342
I thought combining AI models would make it better at producing horse pussy, not worse. What the hell is this?
Anonymous
No.2344
2345
>>2342
>>2343
Looks like you need different generating terms or a differently learned model.
Anonymous
No.2345
>>2344
When I wrote
>blonde
no blonde hair
when I wrote (((((blonde))))) to emphasize the tag above all others I got that weird yellow pic.
Anonymous
No.2346
Spoilered
Spoilered
Spoilered
Spoilered
Spoilered
Twilight Sparkle
Anonymous
No.2347
2348
Spoilered
Spoilered
Spoilered
Spoilered
Rainbow Dash
I'm bored now. The art is coming out crappy. I don't think I'll do the rest of the mane six.
Anonymous
No.2348
2349
>>2347
Are you using the Waifu Model or Pony Model?
>>2321 (Pony model NSFW)
>>2167 (Pony Model SFW)
Anonymous
No.2349
2350
Spoilered
Spoilered
Spoilered
Spoilered
Spoilered
>>2348
I don't remember if I combined those with the other models or not but I'm sure Everything V3 and an anime waifu model are in there.
The mixed model can't make good porn.
Anonymous
No.2350
2351
1673721292.png
1673721186.png
>>2349
Just wondered as the rendering looked a bit like the ones I got when I tried to generate MLP using Waifu model.
>pic 1 Waifu Model (v1.2)
>pic 2 Pony Model

>twilight_sparkle, mlp, seductive
>Steps: 20, Sampler: Euler a, CFG scale: 7, Seed: 3967284458, Size: 512x512
>Not the best seed I guess
Anonymous
No.2351
2352
16737233.png
>>2350
And just to have it added too here is the same prompt and seed in NSFW Pony Model
Anonymous
No.2352
>>2351
Oh my, are they holding hooves?! How lewd!
Anonymous
No.2372
df.jpeg
df2.jpg
>Deepfakes: Faces Created by AI Now Look More Real Than Genuine Photos
>Spoiler alert:
>The single real face in the composite image above is located in the second column from the left, fourth image from the top.
https://www.activistpost.com/2023/01/deepfakes-faces-created-by-ai-now-look-more-real-than-genuine-photos.html
Anonymous
No.2389
So I tried generating something with the (((((arcane style))))) tag and got this.
Turns out if you overrate Arcane's importance you get weird satanic looking shit.
Anonymous
No.2393
File (hide): AC66438689DB8C678C7E5FC03A9B896C-35579587.mov (33.9 MB, Resolution:640x572 Length:00:01:16, 1675462164.mov) [play once] [loop]
1675462164.mov

Anonymous
No.2441
nigger sam hyde.jpg
Nigger Sam Hyde.
Anonymous
No.2447
2481
zcopyr.jpeg
>AI images lose copyright protections
>The decision by the US Copyright Office is among the first to deal with AI-generated artwork and intellectual property
>A US federal agency has concluded that artwork made using artificial intelligence does not qualify for copyright protections, saying such images were not created by a human being and cannot be registered as legitimate IP.
>The US Copyright Office outlined its stance in a recent letter to graphic novelist Kris Kashtanova, who attempted to register a work containing images created with the help of the ‘Midjourney’ AI software. The office would only agree to copyright elements written and arranged by a human author.
https://www.rt.com/news/571952-artificial-intelligence-art-copyright/
Anonymous
No.2480
Fotor_AI-26.jpg
Fotor_AI-27.jpg

Anonymous
No.2481
2484
>>2447
This is interesting. I wonder what it means for the industry as a whole, particularly for artist who only partly use AI tools in their art process.
Anonymous
No.2484
>>2481
I believe that from the very moment they use it, their human intellectual property goes in flames.
Anonymous
No.2491
media_Frd0ulvXgAAHgak.jpg

Anonymous
No.2510
maxresdefault.jpg
>Last Stand | Sci-Fi Short Film Made with Artificial Intelligence - (9:59 long)
>Disclaimed: None of it is real. It’s just a movie, made mostly with AI, which took care of writing the script, creating the concept art, generating all the voices, and participating in some creative decisions. The AI-generated voices used in this film do not reflect the opinions and thoughts of their original owners. This short film was created as a demonstration to showcase the potential of AI in filmmaking.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6dtSqhYhcrs
Anonymous
No.2558
image-13.png

Anonymous
No.2811
bing.jpg
F
Anonymous
No.3013
mud1.jpg
mud2.jpg
mud3.jpg
mud4.jpg

Anonymous
No.3114
3116
1704177172706455.png
image0-188.jpg

Anonymous
No.3116
>>3114
B-but, is that Rainbow Dash, or is she not?
Anonymous
No.3204
File (hide): 814AA3D6DCAB33F140A24AE741A4CAFA-4293860.mp4 (4.1 MB, Resolution:1080x1920 Length:00:00:46, you.are.banned-20240104-0001.mp4) [play once] [loop]
you.are.banned-20240104-0001.mp4

Anonymous
No.3331
>Jonathan Blow on AI art and tech
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DP7kguY2Z6U
In a nutshell: "Mediocre artists will loose their job, and the worthy will remain".