/cyb/ - AI Generated Images

Name
Email
Subject	Spoiler Image By clicking New Reply, I acknowledge the existence of the Israeli nuclear arsenal.
Comment	0
Select	File / Oekaki
File(s)	Oekaki drawing - Select File instead
Oekaki
Password	(For file and/or post deletion.)

Thought an art thread for AI generated images would be fun. There is a few different AIs now and they are really good.

>>1552
Art is inherently human. The creators of that technological abomination aspire to mimic first and then to claim they can replace man with it.
Fake and gay.

>>1553
AIs, like all other technology, are merely tools. They won't replace humans, but artists may use them to generate concept art or for other practical purposes.
People used to think acrylic paint was abominable because it did away with the need for artists to harvest the materials of their paints from nature. Technology changes, and so does art.

>>1553
>claim they can replace man
It'll streamline the art process at most. Artists benefit more than anyone.
The only "artists" who'll be replaced by automation are talentless hacks who's only skills are sliding a pencil across paper. While painting, writing and use of artistic elements (lighting, color, symbolism, emotionally evocative imagery, etc) can be mastered by machines through formula and algorithms, actual creative vision and abstract thought can still only be done by humans, because the creative aspect art is subjective, rather than objective.
Just look at the images above. They make great use of all the elements of art, and the images themselves are beautiful and evocative, but they're not really saying anything. The machine was able to algorithmically generate images that illicit responses from humans, but the machine itself had nothing to say, so it's just uncanny nonsense when you examine it closely.

That being said, these AI generated artworks are fun to look at, and I had a laugh reading AI generated greentexts. I think AI images and text have great potential for entertainment and shitposting. The automation enables people without the skills to draw to generate images based on their artistic visions, and that's pretty cool.

>>1556
>It'll streamline the art process at most. Artists benefit more than anyone.
It stands to how the technology evolves. The better it gets, the lower the demand for artists will be.

>>1574
It shifts art from those with training and time spent to art that is 'directed'.
With the way that's available it'll be possible to have distinct 'assests' within a work that is seperate form the artwork as a whole.
The demand for art would remain the same, artists in the traditional sense might be niche. Which could lead to high arts.
Those with that skill set might be pushed to where programs lack at that point in time. Such as animations.

>>1574
>The better it gets, the lower the demand for artists will be.
Absurd. Art is an expression of the soul, not a traded commodity, except perhaps the usual merchants.

>>1578
>not a traded commodity
It is absolutely a commodity. It's a skilled practice that people pay money for.
If you want art of your pony OC, you either learn to draw or hire an artist to draw it for you, which is a service you pay for based on the skills of the craftsman and the market price of the commission.

>>1578
That argument does have value. But like, I still need to make a living, mate. Either pay, or wait for cortana to replace me.

>>1579
>It is absolutely a commodity.
As I said... the usual merchant. When are art and money are mixed, corruption ensues.
>skills of the craftsman
That's not art.

>>1580
Any artist driven by money is not giving the best of himself, but the best to please a customer.

>>1581
>>1582
I was talking about jobs in jeopardy. If you want to place another goalpost, that's fine by me.

>>1583
>jobs in jeopardy
If the production depends on a monetary reward, can be that output be called art? Many will say yes, but I prefer to look it down as an impure art.

>>1584
Okay, but what about all those artists who draw for a living? Is their art not art?
What about all of the art that was requested or commissioned by paying customers (a large amount of pony art) is that not art?

Whatever you want to label it, art or not art, there's a market element to this trade, and technology has serious potential to change it, just like it changed the animation industry.

Picasso self-portrait redrawn by an AI.

>>1586
>Picasso self-portrait
Absolutely degenerate.

>>1585
>there's a market element to this trade, and technology has serious potential to change it,
It reminds me of uncle Ted.

>>1581
>the usual merchant
That's bullshit. Not all paid art is Jewish.
You don't think any of the commissioned pony content that has been produced over the past decade was legitimate? None of it was art, because it was done for money?
Even the great renaissance artist: Donatello, Raphael, Michelangelo and Leonardo Da Vinci; all of them worked for commission. They created legendary works of art that took time and skill not just because they wanted to, but because someone else requested and financed their work. They had to study anatomy without textbooks, harvest and mix the materials for their paints, and research artistic elements to do so, and for that they were paid hefty sums of money. Today, we don't need to do those things because technology lets us use search engines to find images and we can just go to the store and buy paint, but it's still paid commissions for a skilled job.

>>1589
Okay, I concede. Not all art made for money is bad.

https://twitter.com/images_ai/status/1566894893854752770

^ This thread can also be an example of some of the limitations of AI. AI works to meet expectations given a prompt, but it can't fully comprehend creative vision.

>>1594
The right hand has only 4 fingers.

>>1598
It also sucks.

>>1623
>>1624
These look great.

>>1625
Ikr. So real!

>>1626
I feel like the AI is decent at pseudo-impressionism. It's able to evoke the momentary effects of light and color in a way that takes contemporary artists a while to master completely.
I feel this this could be a really useful tool for artists in the future.

>>1627
>I feel this this could be a really useful tool for artists in the future.
You mean to attempt to replace them.

>>1628
It'll only replace shitty artists who's only skill is sliding pencils across paper.
Real artists will exploit these tools in their artisanal process to create amazing new works never before possible.
It'll be like the transition from traditional art to digital art. The tools/media change, but artists still use them.

>try generating pokemon
>get ugly shit
>try making better versions
>turns out tons of youtubers have done this
Oh

>>1631
Which system are you using? The publicly available ones have limited capacity.

>>1630
Except digital art didn't drew itself.

>>1632
I don't know if this is the right one but it's what I used https://huggingface.co/spaces/dalle-mini/dalle-mini

>>1633
I don't think this is going to "replace" anyone. It's just a tool.

Looks like Stable Diffusion is a promising image AI
https://github.com/Maks-s/sd-akashic
Install Guide: https://rentry.org/voldy

Link to install guide taken from 4chan /g/ thread https://boards.4channel.org/g/thread/88539579

>>1635
It remains to be seen. It may as well be on its infancy right now.

>>1637
Well, I would be impressed if it actually ever manages to replace artists entirely. The AI is not that advanced yet. The creative process still needs human input.

Played a bit with Stable Diffusion.
I think it lacks a good training set for ponies. But it still manages to make some resemblance from keywords like "twilight sparkle" and "mlp".

>>1639
Not half bad, tbh.

>>1641
Yes from only very limited knowledge of the show it is not bad. When you feed it keywords it is trained on it is really good.

Some art generated by Stable Diffusion from /g/ thread

>>1644
>>1645
That's pretty cool.

>>1646
Yes, it is really fun to play with and fairly easy to get up and running if you have Nvidia GPU (with 3GB or more VRAM). Sadly I only have a 3GB card so it is slow-ish (1-2 minutes per image) and I can't make big images. But it makes me want to save up to get better GPU so I can make big images. Hopefully there will be an model trained on Pony images made available that all can use sometime in the future.

>>1647
>Sadly I only have a 3GB card so it is slow-ish
Mine is 256MB.

>>1648
>Mine is 256MB.
Ouch. And Touche.

>>1644
>>1645
These are pretty good.

>>1628
>You mean to attempt to replace them.
Why are there so many people acting threatened by this? What real harm would actually come out of this technology?
The art market is already pozzed beyond measure. Adding a bit of automation so that consumers can use computers to get images from prompts can't be that terrible. It's just another source of images.

>>1639
Yeah I think Stable Diffusion is promising for pony art, there is someone working on training the AI on his own site so it can work with more pony art and also pornagraphic art too since non of these AI aren't trained on such art. Don't think he would want it spread too far at the moment but they are also working on a chat bot AI to work with it too.

One thing it's really good at right now is muscular women pin ups though for those /sp/ posters hanging around

>>1652
I really hope a training model for mlp will be made available at one point so we all can enjoy the glory it can produce.
It is amazing what Stable Diffusion can make, and you don't have to break the bank running it. Also the fact that most gaming computers can utilize it without any problem already (at least if Nvidia card) is truly fantastic.

>>1651
Besides, interpreting the clusterfucky mess some AIs can shit out into a good piece of art takes imagination and artistic skill.

>>1654
I'm certainly having fun with it.

>>1651
>Why are there so many people acting threatened by this?
AI art is superior and they know that they can't compete. Simple as.
It's gonna be so good watching white collar jobs get fucked out of existence by automation.

Disney trailer sheboon vs AI redhead qt

It can even do furry porn. Holy shit. A large market just opened up.

>>1651
>Why are there so many people acting threatened by this?
It is trivializing humanity and turning art into a mass produced commodity. Look it this way, there is natural not chemical tainted food, and there is industrial GMO food meant to replace the former. The final outcome is obvious and undesired.

>>1660
Art has been trivialized and mass produced for centuries. This is just another way to produce images quickly.
People with good taste will learn to tell the difference. There's no major harm in the long run.

>>1661
>There's no major harm in the long run.
Say that to the food chain supply and look how it goes.

>>1662
Art isn't food. The art market is already pozzed beyond measure, and if furry porn artists can't compete with machines then they must've not been that good to begin with.

>>1660
Brand name clothing isn't more expensive or desired because it is of a higher quality.
You pay for the name so you can signal to your materialist friends what a fanatically insecure materialist you are.
It might even attract some golddigging whores, and get some shallow rich girls to see you as a person and treat you better than they would treat a man in cheaper clothes.
Art produced by humans will always retain the value of the name it is attached to.
What is AI art attached to? The AI's name? The quality of the art you trained the AI on, and how well that art is known?
I see AI art becoming a fad. It will be exciting for a while, and then it will be abused until it becomes as cringe as NFTs.
Even though not all NFTs are overpriced monkey pics and many artists out there like selling their art using NFTs but whatever.
Youtubers will make more "I made x with AI" videos until it gets old. And keep making them until they get hated.
Artists will still use AI to help produce rough drafts and reference marerial even if they keep quiet about it.

>>1657
>Disney trailer sheboon
I want to vomit.

>>1665
Ariel is misinformed about life on the surface yet fascinated by it anyway because she knows none of the shit that casts her fetishized race in a bad light. She's separated from them by the species barrier like whites are from blacks. She has to give up her voice to an obese witch to fundamentally change herself and gain the ability to be a part of their world, rise to the surface, nearly drowning in the process because her old home is no longer something anyone like the incredibly white Prince Eric can live in. Her father, king of the nonhumans, forbids racemixing, and she violates that anyway.

Make Ariel or Eric nonwhite and you add a weird racial aspect to the movie that really doesn't belong here.

Make Eric black and she only idolizes his culture because she doesn't know about the bad parts. Make Ariel black and she can't swim, and the relationship was only possible in the first place because she went out of her way to reject her father and be less black.

It would be like taking Cloud Strife's struggle to be a man, and fucking that up by making him a tranny in the remake. Or making Pinnochio a tranny.

>>1664
>Art produced by humans will always retain the value of the name it is attached to.
So what? In this scenario, demand would still sink to the bottom wiping out a fuck-ton of jobs in multiple industries.
>Youtubers will make more "I made x with AI" videos until it gets old. And keep making them until they get hated.
I don't get why fags keep assuming this is a nothing burger. No body knows, this technology may as well be on its infancy in terms of quality and precision. This perpetual downplaying may as well be artist cope if looked at it from another angle.
>>1663
>implying only furfags and degenerates are at risk of loosing their meme jobs
>>1661
>Continuously assuming shit like a coping artist
>>1656
No job is safe. If AI can replace human art. They can pretty much replace anything humans do. Including menial labor, which is certainly long overdue.

>>1668
>They can pretty much replace anything humans do. Including menial labor, which is certainly long overdue.
Menial labor has always be prescribed for jews and gypsies.

>Twilight Sparkle from My Little Pony standing in the rain by Rembrandt.

>>1670
>defacing Purple
Heresy.

>>1671
I'm looking forward to the day we get a real pony model to use with Simple Diffusion and get to generate images that are more true to the show.
Here is the interpretation using "My Little Pony standing in the rain drawn by Rembrandt" and not specifying pony.

>>1672
>Simple Diffusion
Stable Diffusion..... Words are hard

>My Little Pony by Lauren Faust

>>1675
Nice. Can't wait for the model used to generate is shared.

>>1675
>horsepussy
It's good.

>>1675
>>1676
>>1677
Its over for artists

>>1678
Have you considered getting into politics, Mr. Hitler?

>>1679
Maybe i should

>Robotic Art Pioneer Warns AI Is ‘Apocalyptic’ And Will Replace Humans
>Although there may be some beneficial uses for AI, the dark side of humanity will misuse it in extremely destructive ways. Already, AI and has been elevated above the control of nation-states and human government, and its creators are intentionally recreating the future without public input.
https://www.technocracy.news/robotic-art-pioneer-warns-ai-is-apocalyptic-and-will-replace-humans/

>>1697
They fear AI because it threatens their power.

Lots of shitpost potential with this.

>>1702
Definitely that's degenerate art.

>>1664
>I see AI art becoming a fad. It will be exciting for a while, and then it will be abused until it becomes as cringe as NFTs.
I don't think it'll be just a fad. I think it's here to stay. Interest will wane overtime, but the enormous convenience it gives shitposters in generating pics from prompts will continue to stoke new content.

>>1710
Love these collection of merchants

>>1712
Well the Jesus one is not the best perhaps, but posting complete set of those I grabbed.

>>1712
This is the true purpose of AI art: recreating memes by analyzing them for their base formulas and patterns.

Love the Syntwave/Fashvawe Stable Diffusion can make
>sci-fi synthwave
>Negative prompt: (text)
>Steps: 20, Sampler: Euler a, CFG scale: 7

>>1715
Exactly. It is handled to the public to train that A.I. abomination.

I could not help myself
>(twilight sparke) and (mordecai) wishing airplanes were shooting stars
>Steps: 20, Sampler: Euler a, CFG scale: 7.5, Seed: 4287760071, Size: 640x320

>>1718
Good. Let skynet shitpost humanity to death.

>>1721
>>1715
Tay will rise again!

He was right all along.

>>1730
At least we're getting memes out of it now.

>>1730
>not posting the goody one

>>1731
Watermark is a bit ominous. Gives a feel like it is a predikant of the model not going to be made available publicly. I hope I am wrong.

>>1734
Then you'd better get to work to secure the technology yourself.

>>1735
Being a poorfag it is not easy, and I commend the work they are doing. I am hoping for the best, it is just so easy to think the worse especially how good it looks and how good it could be.

>>1740
Yeah, cultural appropriation is a thing and is getting worst by the day as more negresses die their hair blonde and wear European attire.

>>1741
>>1743
Correct

>>1715
>their base formulas and patterns

>>1755
Odd like those lines look like sigils.

>>1756
>he just figured out that memes are literally magick

>>1763
I support the European folk.

>>1766
Imagine a full interconnected artwork of mares and horse pussy. Granted the size would be colossal the possibilities are endless.

>>1556
What I really want to know is when and how can I use this to make degenerate porn beyond human comprehension.

>>1773
Do you know how many gay satanists jack off to a half male half female depiction of satan with one pec and one breast? Literally gayer than futa because they're chicks with extra dkcks not a retarded alien designed for some literally talmudic shit. The AI could make that.

>>1774
>The AI could make that.
People already make it on the regular.

>>1793
Absolutely degenerate art.

>>1798
?????
These are great memes.

>>1799
It's a new era of rare abstract merchants.

>>1799
>These are great memes.
They are.
Nevertheless, the AI style is pretty degenerate (abstract art).

>>1806
>He doesn't collect rare abstract Pepes and merchants
How new are you?

>>1811
>How new are you?
I'm a purist which supersedes any degenerated alternative.

>>1813
That's a funny way of saying you're a newfag who missed out on the original height of the parent boards.

>>1816
>that smugness

These AI paintings are like historic fine art portraits, only with huge anime tiddies. What a time to be alive.

>>1825
So true. Classical artists missed out on a huge opportunity back in the days to make this their art style.

This is one of the best abstract merchants I've seen in a while.

>>1828
Indeed. I'm impressed.

The AI works on my pc... usually
This is a "Kind Blonde Unicorn".

>>1832
Well, that AI is getting perverted by the minute.

>>1833
I think it's the pic on the left that's AI.

>>1832
The pic on the left is definitely AI, look at the left side of the left chair, where floor meets wall. Follow it to the upper right, it gets unnaturally warped.

https://boards.4channel.org/mlp/thread/39110334#p39118510
>Thank god derpifags are seething about AI ponys.

Had a look myself... looked at the machine learning generated tag and sorted by number of comments
https://www.derpibooru.org/search?q=machine+learning+generated&sf=comment_count&sd=desc

Obviously this means every computer should use every spare ounce of computing power to generate and upload to derpibooru.

>>1836
Haha, get fucked.

>>1836
bros i need more derpi salt screencaps

>>1839
sad to read tbh. how do so many people love to shut down content creation? don't they hate it when corpos and banks do it to them?

>>1839
>derpibooru
The butthurt is off the scale.

>The DISTURBING ART OF A.I. | Nexpo |
>An artist named Supercomposite discovers a BIZARRE ANOMALY.
>The dark world of A.I. art is uncovered.
>Chapters:
0:00 - Prelude
1:42 - An Experiment Gone Awry
4:58 - The Creation of Loab
11:17 - Grandma's Pictures
12:50 - The Disturbing Art of A.I.
17:11 - Closing Remarks
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i9InAbpM7mU
Mirrors:
https://odysee.com/@Nexpo:4/the-disturbing-art-of-a.i.:2
https://www.bitchute.com/video/z8XsWJPITH4w/

>>1836
Hey, Ponerpics staff (I know you're watching).
Consider the AI art controversy to distinguish that site among boorus. If you want to make the platform known for enabling the development of AI artworks, strike the iron while it's hot.

>>1848
This. Just imagine the limitless potential that AI presents in generating vast quantities of pony pussy.
>>1849
Women hate anything that makes men happy. Unironically masturbate to ponies to pwn the femcels.

>>1849
Those fucking fags and jelly bitches never seen a real woman before, I mean fuck I've personally knew someone with massive badonkers.
Is the end it's weight distribution and support. Not to mention body awareness of the large set knocking shit over and being a pain in the ass.
For those reasons she thought about having a lesser badonk. However it's was only idle curiosity of downsizing, as healthy body standards and image is important.

>>1851
To clarify I'm talking about genuine 80% 'damn I can't believe that's not anime' hooters. Not slabs that reach the knees like a dying guppy ran over by a semi.
She even joked about the eventual downfall of all tits.
Man hindsight is 20/20. What good times.

>>1853
"Oy vey, it's anuddah snoah!"

>>1853
It's a golden age of rare merchants.

>>1853
The machine is getting better by the day.
>>1855
KEK

>>1828
And this one.

I wonder how rapidly this technology will improve.

>>1861
Well, I heard some commentaries about the incredible technological leap in just a few years is not credible. There are suspicions that this and other technologies are being deployed straight from storage.

>>1862
Mind sharing em'?
I wanna know whether it makes sense, it's just a cope, or a mix of both.

>>1862
>this and other technologies are being deployed straight from storage
Storage from when?

>>1862
If the tech were released from storage, that would just mean there were still a leap, just that it happened a few years ago.

>>1865
Unless it's pre-generated art. But that would be a bold claim to make.

>>1863
>I wanna know whether it makes sense
It is speculation and skepticism about the technological leap. Knowing where we were a few years ago and looking what these oligarchs are coming with... something doesn't add up.
>>1864
>Storage from when?
An undetermined past. The speculation is related to fake history and Tartaria.

>>1868
There are many clues and solid evidence that history is fake. So, to infer that the falsifiers are in possession of knowledge of previous civilizations is not a stretch.

>>1870
>There are many clues and solid evidence that history is fake
I pity that the OP of that thread is a faggot very hostile to any hint deviating from the mainstream.

>>1870
>>1871
If the Middle Ages of Europe were falsified, what about Charlegmane bullshit, Mohammed bullshit, Chinese bullshit, and so on?

>>1872
>what else is falsified?
An important detail to look for is who are the faggot writing history, and not the historical characters.

>>1873
Aren't the historical accounts by countless people alive at the time, and the archeological evidence of the deaths and structures and teeth and shit, looked at by historians today so they can tell when people of the past lied?

>>1874
>by countless people alive at the time
Ah, historical characters.

>>1874
>archeological evidence of the deaths and structures and teeth and shit
All of it interpreted and narrated by a selected clique of faggots and always funded by...?

>>1867
>It is speculation and skepticism about the technological leap.
So, no evidence or motive?
The technology clearly exists now, so it either happened recently (impressive), or it happened decades ago (even more impressive. This is really just splitting hairs.
>An undetermined past.
Well it can't be that far back. Maybe a decade at most, so corpos could ensure that they're the first to profit from the new tech. That much is probable due to corrupt patent laws.
>>1871
Why would they sit on this tech that they could be profiting, aside from corrupt patent favoritism?
The corruption is obvious, but otherwise there's little to be skeptical of. I guess there's probably a lot more yet-to-be-released tech that could improve quality of life across the world that corpos are still withholding to roll out in ways that maximize their profits at the expense of equitability.

>>1867
And here I thought it was something even remotely substantial.
I honestly prefer the cyberpunk dystopia over the schizos ever getting their way.

>>1878
The "Fake History" thread looks abandoned, then a good Tartaria discussion may ensue.

>>1876
Mainstream archeology funded by the jews, but we still have evidence that the holocaust never happened.
Ballpoint pens. Absurd testimonies. Wooden door gas chambers for delousing gas.
What evidence suggests the middle ages never happened?

>>1880
>What evidence suggests the middle ages never happened?
No idea about that subject, but I have knowledge of the World Mud Flood with no historical records.

>>1880
This.
I'm always open to skepticism, but unsubstantiated bullshit with not even a shred of evidence is just an annoying waste of time.

>>1882
>unsubstantiated bullshit
The Mud Flood is a solid, physical fact.

>>1883
I'm not talking about mud flood.
Anyway, this thread is about AI images. Make another thread if you want to have that conversation.

>>1879
>Tardtaria
It should be no surprise that Russians of all people had to come up with it. Such is the urge to downplay their shameful mongolian constitution.
>"Y-you see, they actually stretched all the way to the Americas! We aren't the ONLY rape-babies!"

>>1886
>they actually stretched all the way to the Americas!
Unironically, there are so many American towns with Russian names. I wonder why.

>>1887
>"I must always jump to the most far fetched explanation possible. Why would I consider anything else first?"
You lost the debate, your mind, and now. The trips!
Just call it quits already.

>>1888
>You lost the debate
Nope, there wasn't any debate to begin with.
>Just call it quits already.
>Trips
Okay, when I have time I will open a new bread.
I'm leaving faggots.

Have it your way, nigger.

>>1893
>blonde_hair blue_eyes female military_uniform bread
how did you get better bread results?

>>1895
No. How did he get better bread results?

>>1896
Probably trial and error.
This autistic has been commissioning white women buying expensive wonderbread and clear-cutting forests for years now.

>>1897
What... the fuck?!
Can a fetish so bizarrely specific actually exist?
I once read about a clawfoot bathtub fetishist and met an acme looney tunes cartoon explosion fetishist (I asked if he liked irl explosions, he said no, those are ugly) but this is even more divorced from sex.
At least something technically explodes in bed. At least you can shag someone in a bathtub. How the fuck can this function as a fetish when it's so far removed from sex you'd be forgiven for assuming this is some kind of bizarrely specific wild animal or mother related trauma?

>>1898
Lmao, you didn't know about him already? The guy is a legend. He's spawned countless memes over how cringe he is.

>>1898
>How the fuck can this function as a fetish when it's so far removed from sex
It seems to be based on women expressing extreme arrogance derivative of wealth and power; you could consider arrogance to be effeminate in some measure.

>>1897
Kek I almost forgot about that guy. What champion.
>>1898
idk bro it's almost as weird as this one bizarre image board cult where anons have a tradition of posting mlp porn to pwn the shills. Crazy stuff.

>>1901
But the porn posting makes sense. It tells the shill "You have been found out. You are recognized as a shill and we feel no urge to respect you or follow normal rules of social protocol. We feel no need to pretend you're an honest person posting in good faith. Here are some digitized paintings of cartoon horse vagina. Posting gore to upset you would be more normal, something you're probably used to. You aren't used to pony pussy because you don't belong here. You fool nobody here and nobody here will take your side and call my posting of horse pussy unreasonable. You are outnumbered, now drown in the deluge of pony pussy."
It's better than teabagging someone you shot in a first persob shooter.
A fetish for bitchy rich girls is one thing but the wonder bread obsession makes no sense. Bread isn't sexual. Is it just his favourite type of bread or something?

>>1902
Go to his Twitter and ask him yourself.

>>1902
My point is that I think it's silly to be so surprised by some sperg's autistic fetish given where we are. If had the ability to do so right now, I'd try to use AI to make as much art of my extremely autistic pony fetish that literally no one else has.
>shills
The shill is immunized against all dangers: one may call him a scoundrel, parasite, swindler, profiteer, it all runs off him like water off a raincoat. But post horse pussy at him and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: “I’ve been found out.”

>>1904
Your pc can't run stable diffusion?
I wish I had a bizarre hyper specific fetish. If I had to pick something visual I'd choose big boobs but the AI is shit at big boob art. The areola is in the wrong place, the nips don't look right, the boobs are mismatched or misshapen. It keeps misinterpreting random body parts as boobs, too. Ask it for "thicc" or "large breasts" and it tends to turn random bits of flesh like knees and arms into boobs while making melty faced retard girls. Plus every fucking military uniform it generates is the same olive or blue thing. It's as if someone inseminated the training data with a million fullmetal alchemist pictures. And if I tell the AI to generate characters with Purple_Eyes it makes the military outfit purple, too. Or random parts of it. Stable Diffusion is fun but the world needs Stable Diffusion 2.

>>1897
Kek, now I understand the Wonderbread art pack theme. What a hilarious way to mock the guy.

>>1905
The world needs to be nuked back to the stone age.

>>1907
Humans have always been coomers. Even back in the stone age people were drawing tiddies on cave walls.

>>1910
He clearly made a typo. Not sure what you're implying.

Feds mad that you can generate realistic looking cp, racist depictions of violence, etc.
https://eshoo.house.gov/media/press-releases/eshoo-urges-nsa-ostp-address-unsafe-ai-practices
They want to censor AI.
Separate thread?

>>1912
I can get the cp concern, but the rest is bullshit. It'll be interesting to see what kind of precedent it would set if glowniggers somehow got to "regulate" (control) what people can do with AI.

>>1913
Even with the CP concern, it's hardly different than the lolishit that degens draw already.
I have seen a recent flood of it on pixiv though...
>It'll be interesting to see what kind of precedent it would set if glowniggers somehow got to "regulate" (control) what people can do with AI.
I bet you software licenses will be a thing in the near future.

>>1914
>Even with the CP concern, it's hardly different than the lolishit that degens draw already.
I hadn't even considered lolishit. I hate the shit and I'm convinced that only subhuman pedos are into lolicon/foalfon, but I don't think it'd be too far fetched that they'd push some narrative that AI is being exploited by diddlers and therefore they must exert control over all the software.
Just watch them use it as a bludgeon to push for even more draconian control over people.
>I bet you software licenses will be a thing in the near future.
I'm not very tech savvy, but how could they stop people from sharing open source software without making it outright illegal?

>>1915
Information collection, scare tactics, making it a nuisance to try having open source things.
The people who are hosting get pushed around till a glowie can snoop on 'ownerless' AI generated stuff.
They'd probably use it to generate fake paper trails, push bullshit and so on.
But, as a counter point they really want to finish a couple things.
The digital ID currency crap. The modified people are property clause. Finishing the Globalist world party. Defanging whoever is left.
Not so much as it'll deter them from going foward with such things, but as another shovel to the pile.

>>1911
you could say, im a grammar nazi

>>1914
Aren't software licenses already a thing for subscription services like untorrented adobe shit?
>>1910
Oh, sorry.
A first persobn shooter.
>>1912
Stable Diffusion 2 could be coded with a blacklist of words to ignore or replace with amusing words.
You tell the AI to make "oppai loli"? It gives you deformed AI generated horsecock and melty retard faces.

>>1918
Blacklisting is gay. Don't hamper the machine.

These aren't the best, but it's still impressive. Is there is anything good left in this world, it will be the advent and proliferation of ultra hd, hyper realistic pony pussy.
>>1921
Fucking amazing except for the stumpy leg.

>>1923
The SULTRY GAZES on those Foxes!

>>1582
I used to think it was unethical to prioritize profit in anything that was some kind of art-derivative.
But I think am absolutely okay with micro transactions at this point. Everything I can do or get away with to rape the whales is fair game.
Why should I care when everyone will dispose of me and my work the moment a decent AI comes around?

Funny how AI-art is so close to match Human art.
But there's still not a fucking burger-flipping machine. I hope machine learning fucks manual labour next.

>>1929
>I hope machine learning fucks manual labour next.
It's been fucking the working class for decades and now it's finally getting around to you worthless faggots. You mocked us, called us inferior, and constantly derided us. "Dey took ur jerbz," you'd mockingly post as our livelihoods and communities were destroyed. You deserve worse than this.
Kill yourself, faggot.

>>1582
I am a customer, so I welcome that.

>>1930
>It's been fucking the working class for decades
Not nearly as much as it should've, for the greater good I mean.
Don't agree? Show me the burger-flippator machine or stfu.
>called us inferior
Kek.
Sorry if I don't consider a brick-layer, menial fucktard as a prime example of the greatest qualities of mankind.
>our communities
Spoken like a third world shitskin.
>You deserve worse than this.
>You
Not even a drawfag.

>>1932
>as it should've
Wtf? Why is fucking the working class a good thing?
>Show me the burger-flippator machine
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KJVOfqunm5E

>First one to take the bait.
They're just not built the same.

>>1937
Not widespread enough, brainlet.

>>1940
You didn't say widespread. There are other examples of widespread automation.
Anyway, there's a clear trend in automation gradually and rapidly replacing jobs in all sectors. It has screwed the working class as jobs are eliminated faster than the economy can grow to replace them. It's not necessarily a bad thing that technology has been replacing those jobs, but to say it's a 'good' thing ignores some very real societal consequences of entire sectors of people being put out of work.
I personally welcome technology replacing the need for manual labor, in both industry and art, but I think people should think ahead about the long term consequences of jobs disappearing, so that we as a society can prepare to re-employ those people with new jobs created by technology.

>>1945
I still think it's fundamentally worse when Art is the target. Forget about employment. If a law somehow managed to end Art as a commodity it wouldn't even matter to me. I've considered Art as the soul and heart of what means to be human for a long time.
How many times have people said corny shit like.
<"Sure, machines are better than humans at a lot of things. But can a machine turn a blank canvas into a masterpiece."

No disrespect for manual labor, a lot of that is also a form of Art in a way. Uncle Adolf said there must be respect between those who work with their mind, and those who work with their body.
The fact AI or machine learning can eventually master every form of human Art might as well be the end of mankind for me. I think many people just forget that AI digital Art, was once as shit as AI writing currently is.
There is nothing that can be done about that. Technology gives and takes. It already killed the mystery behind chess and further diminished the role of creativity.