/cyb/ - Cyberpunk Fiction and Fact

>>2790
Weird shadows

>>2790
It was partial where I am. It could be viewed through about 4 pairs of sunglasses, or a welding mask. You could see it pretty well, but cameras would always only show a circular sun.

>>2688
This humongous potential to cash on freeloaders.

>>2793
WTF is that?

..in the years 1950-1951, the A. C. Gilbert Company distributed the Gilbert U-238 Atomic Energy Lab, a toy kit allowing kids to make nuclear reactions at home using actual radioactive material. It was taken off the shelves in 1951.

>>2805
>they actually gave kids radioactive materials to play with
>taken off the shelf one year later
Top kek.

>>2836
>zoomers
Avoid like the plague. And never hire them.

>>2837
>don't hire the next generation
Absolute boomer logic.
Also
>zoomers
Those kids are gen alpha. Zoomers are in their late teens and mid 20s.

>>2838
>don't hire the next generation
That's right. Phonefags deserve their phone.

>>2839
What does that even mean? Zoomers aren't the only people who own phones. Boomers have them too.
>That's right.
So just let society collapse. Great.
Boomers will say this shit and then have a cow when their social security gibs aren't being maintained.

>>2840
1- I'm not a zoomer
2- I've zero gibs
3- I never owned a smartphone or TV
4- For my own experience, I positively know that zoomer are slimy trash.

>>2841
Zoomers are just people born after a certain time period. I don't think millennials or boomers are any better.
>I'm not a zoomer
What are you then?
>For my own experience
Anecdote. Cool.

>>2841
>1- I'm not a zoomer
1b- I'm not a boomer either

>>2842
>Anecdote. Cool.
Yep. I've got burnt by those entitled zoomers more than once. Avoid.

>>2845
>I've got burnt by those entitled
I could say the same about boomers, millennials and gen x.
That aside, the kids in the video are too young to be zoomers. Zoomers are in their 20s.
It's gen alpha that doesn't know how computers work, because nobody taught them.

>>2846
>I could say the same about boomers, millennials and gen x.
Yeah, but the zoomer unique characteristic is that they are good for nothing and a drag, almost like a woman.

>>2847
>unique characteristic
Elaborate.

>>2847
What generation are you?

>>2848
They have no initiative or independent thought to face challenges, meaning they have zero value as troubleshotters. They behave like actual niggers looking the time for ending their shift and have no interest into get involved in their job. I'll hire a foreigner every time, sorry.

>>2850
>They have no initiative or independent thought to face challenges
The oldest zoomers just got out of college. They're starting small businesses and entrepreneurship at a rate not seen in decades.

>>2850
You realize that most foreign workers are also zoomers, right?

>>2851
>They're starting small businesses and entrepreneurship at a rate not seen in decades.
Sure, with a capital not of their own. See? Zoomers have it too cushy too begin with, that said, their prospects too make their business work is bleak, the market is not as it was. This is a service economy and not a one for producing goods any longer. So, yes, in this market zoomers are heading for utter economic failure.
>>2852
>You realize that most foreign workers are also zoomers, right?
Not at all, and the difference in attitude towards a job is like day and night.

>>2837
>He hates young people
Lol, lmao even

>>2853
>with a capital not of their own
That's not even close to true. Venture capital has all but dried up for this generation. Boomers screwed the economy and millennials spent the rest on avocado toast.
>the market is not as it was
And who caused that?
Zoomers have only been working full time for a couple years at most. They didn't make the economy what it is.
>This is a service economy
You can thank millennials and gen x for that, after the boomers screwed them.
>the difference in attitude towards a job
Zoomer isn't an attitude: it's an age. Everyone born within a certain time period is a zoomer.

>>2853
What gen are you?

>>2855
>Zoomer isn't an attitude: it's an age.
Sure, but modern kids are not the same than before. The stench of weed and the associated moral relaxation comes to my mind. Avoid.

>>2857
>The stench of weed
Oh don't give me that. Boomers were the hippie generation and made weed popular; same goes for every gen until the turn of the millennium. Gen Z has the least weed of any generation, because they've lived their entire lives while weed was legal.
>moral relaxation
Moral relaxation that boomers caused with their sexual revolution and destruction of the family unit, followed by waves of multiculturalism.
Gen X is the first Gen to actually have a shift to the right. They're also far less likely to have casual sex compared to the last three generations.

>>2858
>legal
illegal

>>2858
>Oh don't give me that.
I do.

Talking about zoomer character.

>>2860
Gen Z has less weed consumers than every generation before it.

>>2861
How is it that zoomers would have lower testosterone than their parents if they're born from the same blood?
It's boomers who consume all of the T-boosting meds, because they can't come to terms with the fact that they're getting old.

>>2863
>It's boomers who consume all of the T-boosting meds
I wouldn't step on the pharmaceutical field for an answer, but the indoctrinational one instead. Zoomers have been under communist brainwashing for many years and the intensity is increasing. There is a correlation with the manifested judaism in a given society and the rate of moral disintegration.

>>2866
That has nothing to do with hormone levels.
>Zoomers have been under communist brainwashing for many years
That the last three generations enabled and perpetuated.
Zoomers are the generation that is forced to deal with the final consequences of the world that boomers created.
>There is a correlation with the manifested judaism
I will once again cite how boomers worship Israel.
>moral disintegration
Caused by hippie boomers with their sexual revolution and enabling faggots to spread.

Gen Z is only starting: they're all 15-25, and they hardly have anything to work with due to the state of the economy and social fabric of the world.

>>2868
>unreal levels of entitled boomer
Well, I admit I saw that kind before. Luckily I could leave before I punched that faggot in the face.

Lead paint.
Interesting….could this be correct?

>>2871
Unlikely. A thin coating of lead paint isn't going to block anything. It's not solid lead, just particles of it. The lead shields they use for X rays and radiation therapy are solid pieces of lead, not paint. The "certain frequencies can't penetrate" thing seems like total BS too, since he doesn't cite whatever frequencies are blocked by paint.
EM waves would also still penetrate through the windows and other parts of houses. You would need a thick dome of lead to completely protect your house from EM waves.
Lead is actually very, very poisonous, and you don't want even a little bit of it inside of you because it causes severe brain damage. It was marketed heavily to be put into things unnecessarily because it was a byproduct in the production of silver, and the silver refiners needed to find a way to get rid of and profit from it. It nearly rendered an entire generation of people retarded.

It's just stupid clickbait tier bullshit.

>>2874
>A thin coating of lead paint isn't going to block anything. It's not solid lead, just particles of it.
I heard that microwave antennas can be blocked with silver paint which contain aluminum particles. At least the low power ones

>>2875
That's not the kind of paint that was used in houses.
Also, that's just microwaves.
What frequencies are actually blocked by houses with lead paint?

>>2876
>That's not the kind of paint that was used in houses.
Correct. But the principle is the same. Metallic particles blocking or at least degrading the signal. I guess that an experiment might be done surrounding a router with a cardboard painted with silver paint.

>>2877
>But the principle is the same
It's not really. Just because one kind of wave is blocked by another paint in a different context does not mean that lead paint blocks anything in any notable capacity. Silver is not lead, and the amount of metal in it isn't the same.
Lead paint was removed because rendering the taxpaying population retarded was hurting productivity, and to this day a lot of old lead paint and pipes still remain, and kids raised in those conditions are still being gimped because its not convenient for the government to do anything to stop it.
>surrounding a router with a cardboard painted with silver paint.
Messing with a routers would be the same as shielding an entire house. You would need to get the type of device that the elites supposedly want penetrating the building, build two identical houses (one with lead paint, one without), and tap both of the houses with the device and see if the lead paint has any meaningful impact.

>>2878
>would
*would not

>>2871
You know they sell metal tape. As in strips of metal with sticky stuff you can by and cover a very sizable room making a faraday cage relatively cheaply.
Did you know you can just buy powdered metals.
Or now metal artwork that is metal and wouldn't draw any attention?
You can buy loads of lead is various forms. It's soft and pliable, easy to fix components attaching wires ect. Going into the air.
Like most things it also degrades.
Microwave ovens arn't made of lead.
So while the point of removing lead from paint is the safety hazard because of deteriorating mental stability.
And it's after the wave of lead boosted gas, which I might add did increase efficiency by a large margin, that scared a nation of being poisoned by wide spread 'accepted' things.
Asbestos, radiation ect ect.

Just get tons of scrap metal. Or live in a cargo crate, those are options too.
There's rebar and metal walk ways are surprisingly affordable. It could cost as much as needed for peace of mind.

>>2879
>would not
All right, I found the answer:
https://emfacademy.com/emf-paint/

>>2881
That's not lead paint.

>>2882
>That's not lead paint.
WOW. Did you read all that in less than 45 seconds?

>>2883
No, I've just heard of this stuff before, and I know it's not made of lead.
The lead paint that was taken out of circulation isn't sufficient as shielding paint.

>>2884
>The lead paint that was taken out of circulation isn't sufficient as shielding paint.
I'm sure of that, but it degrades the signal for sure.

>>2880
Faraday Cages require specific materials and angle-of-approach calculations in order to determine which wavelengths can be protected against. For a single room to be entirely shielded you would need an external layer of high carbon (stainless) steel, then extruded aluminum, 99% copper, >95% lead, and an internal layer of low carbon steel sheeting, all of at least 1/20" thickness that completely encloses the walls and ceiling with no gaps.

Would be much more efficient to create a small, selective 'safe' of sorts to shield specific devices.. unless you need a neutron-protected bunker.

>>2885
>but it degrades the signal for sure
... No?
Where did you hear that it degrades the signal? By what margin does it do that?

>>2887
>Where did you hear that it degrades the signal? By what margin does it do that?
Would you mind to do a quick research? Perhaps starting with >>2881 ?

>>2885
Lead paint only contains a tiny amount of lead for color, and doesn't provide any kind of shielding or degrade the signal.
Heck, the wood/brick wall would degrade the signal more than the traces of lead in the paint.
>>2888
That's not lead paint. That's specially made shielding paint with large amounts of shielding materials in it.

>>2889
>That's specially made shielding paint with large amounts of shielding materials in it
Aha! And the shielding materials are...?

>>2891
Not lead, as per the article.
You need to have a high density of material for shielding materials to do anything at all. Tiny traces of lead do nothing.

>>2892
>You need to have a high density of material for shielding
Would you mind to list them then?

>>2893
They're in the same article you posted, ffs.

>>2894
MFW a retarded tries to look smart.

>>2895
Lmao. Now you're just projecting.
You've been saying that poisonous lead was taken off the market just because it could potentially distort certain EMF waves (it can't,; it doesn't have enough lead), when all the non-toxic shielding paints are still on the market.

>>2893
Most EMF paints are made with graphene/graphite as their blocking material.

>>2896
>You've been saying that poisonous lead was taken off the market just because it could potentially distort certain EMF waves
1- Lead being poisonous is still for debate
2- There is a reason antenna's protections are made with fiber glass and not painted polymers.

>>2897
>Most EMF paints are made with graphene/graphite as their blocking material
It might, but I doubt that is the main active component because is way too expensive.

>>2898
>1- Lead being poisonous is still for debate
How? Who is it that contests that lead is poisonous?
Is that what you're saying?
>2- There is a reason antenna's protections are made with fiber glass and not painted polymers.
What's that have to do with lear paint?

>>2900
>What's that have to do with lear paint?
Not exclusively with lead paint, but with many paints containing metals.

>>2899
EMF paint is expensive.
And yes, it is the main blocking ingredient. Look at the article posted above.

>>2902
Dude, as a analogy you can understand. A pharmaceutical pill weights perhaps 0,1 gram, but the active drugs is not more than 0,001 gram.

>>2901
Other non-toxic metals haven't been removed from paint, so that's a moot point.
And lead paint doesn't have enough lead paint to block signals.

Want to test it? Acquire some 1970s lead paint (not hard if you know where to look) and cover a router with a cardboard box painted with it: see absolutely no difference.

>>2903
Drug terminology does not apply to paint.

>>2904
>>2905
Okay. You are right.

>>2906
I guess that's that then.

Idk if I can convince you that lead will fuck you up, but it really is toxic, and I pray for your children if you raise them in a house with it. Don't fall for stupid ticktock memes telling you to paint your house with it. If you want to block EMF waves, get EMF paint.

>>2907
>lead will fuck you up, but it really is toxic
I understand you point of view. The jewish TV told you so.

>>2908
Who told you otherwise?

>>2909
Researching anon. The more you dig, the more worms come out.

>>2908
Better start huffing in those soldering fumes bro.

>>2908
What would Jews have to gain from telling people to that lead is poisonous? A company run by literal Jews marketed it for paint and pipes because they were looking for a profitable way to dispose of their industrial waste, and Americans paid the price.
>>2910
What research did you do?

>>2908
>>2911
Also it'll make the water taste sweeter. Easy sugar substitute.

>>2911
I don't even use lead solder (even though it works well) because my shitty job isn't worth compromising my health for a slight increase in efficiency.

>>2911
That's why you need to research anon. Ingestion is not the same than breathing. An analogy if you don't mind; serpent's venon is lethal if injected, but harmless if swallowed.

>>2915
Lead is poisonous no matter how you get it in your body.
There was a recent study analyzing the baby teeth of children in areas with lead pipes and it was found that lead was building up in their bodies and causing brain damage.

>>2916
>There was a recent study
Ah, the $$$ studies $$$. /s

>>2917
Okay, what's your source of information?

>>2917
You said you researched, and yet your research didn't involve any studies?

>>2918
Sorry anon but I don't carry a database with me.

>>2920
I do.
Give me a name of the report and I'll read it right now, if you're really so certain of the validity of your "research".

>>2921
>I do.
Great, would you mind to research it then?
BTW, zog's sources don't count.

>>2922
What counts as "zog sources" then? Any source that says lead is toxic?
The only research I'm finding refuting the toxicity of lead are 1970'e propaganda funded by the silver refinery that was interested in selling lead.

>>2923
>What counts as "zog sources" then?
Are you even an anon?

>>2922
Tell me what counts as "ZOG" to you and I'll strike it from the search. There's a lot of research about lead toxicity from a lot of different sources.