/cyb/ - Cyberpunk Fiction and Fact

Cyberpunk is the idea that technology will condemn us to a future of totalitarian nightmares here you can discuss recent events and how technology has been used to facilitate greater control by the elites, or works of fiction


If you want to see the latest posts from all boards in a convenient way please check out /overboard/

Name
Email
Subject
By clicking New Reply, I acknowledge the existence of the Israeli nuclear arsenal.
Comment
0
Select File / Oekaki
File(s)
Password (For file and/or post deletion.)

2784708.png
Post in this thread every time you visit /cyb/
Anonymous
No.1422
1609
Let's get this board moving.
577 replies and 263 files omitted.
Anonymous
No.3161
3162
>>3160
>fascinating
I agree, but take into account that most of their "ideas" are based in "Theoretical Physics" which is also based on "Theoretical Math", which is based on math tricks such as multi-dimensional matrices with not correlation with the physical world.
Anonymous
No.3162
3163
>>3161
>not correlation with the physical world
Oh sure, nuclear fusion reactors are totally irrelevant. No point in researching those
Anonymous
No.3163
3164 3165
>>3162
>nuclear fusion reactors are totally irrelevant
Name an actual one functioning. The theory sounds great but its implementation is science fiction.
Anonymous
No.3164
3166
>>3163
>Name an actual one functioning
The JT-60SA in Japan
Anonymous
No.3165
>>3163
Go take a look at the sun and stars.
>that's not what I ment!
Anonymous
No.3166
3167
87465.jpg
>>3164
>The JT-60SA in Japan
Not actually functioning. Call me it does.
https://www.jt60sa.org/wp/
Anonymous
No.3167
3168
>>3166
It already works, it's just continuing to developed. It's already generated plasma fields.
Anonymous
No.3168
3169 3170 3171 3172
>>3167
>It's already generated plasma fields.
I'm not arguing that as it can be done in a home lab.
What I'm arguing is its capability to be used a mass energy supply for a city. I mean its characteristics to be economically viable and not a simple project for burning money.
Allow me to clarify; all these "marvelous" devices are propped as the new tech, the vanguard, the future, however the KEY for all of them to be practical is the power relation input/output. Then the input of power/energy MUST be lower than the output. Can that be possible? As the current technology is developed, I very much doubt it.
Anonymous
No.3169
3173
>>3168
>What I'm arguing is its capability to be used a mass energy supply for a city.
Just last year it created a net positive yield, which is a huge deal because it means that given some time to optimize it could generate enormous amounts of energy with no waste and barely any fuel.
Which is why researching the science behind it is important.
Anonymous
No.3170
3171
>>3168
Seeing as submarines and aircraft carriers run entirely on nuclear technology, I fail to see how a city can't be.
Anonymous
No.3171
3172 3176 3195
>>3170
>Seeing as submarines and aircraft carriers run entirely on nuclear technology
That is totally different tech. Current nuclear energy is so simple as to heat a boiler to generate steam, which spins a turbine, which spins a electric generator. No much science is involved in that.

>>3168
>because it means that given some time to optimize
Okay, you rest on faith. I'm don't want to be a contrarian, but to my knowledge, the fusion technology is at least 50 years away for commercial deployment.
Anonymous
No.3172
3174
>>3168
>Then the input of power/energy MUST be lower than the output.
It's like a bastardized chemical exothermic reaction.
Getting the two components to bond ejects a high energy neutron (proton and election bonded tightly), the conditions is tons of heat, movement and those two isotopes.
>>3171
>Current nuclear energy is so simple as to heat a boiler to generate steam,
One of the fusion reactors shunts the hot high energy neutron to coolent aka basically water and you know what would happen next.
Other types attempt other things.
Anonymous
No.3173
3175
>>3169
>it could generate enormous amounts of energy with no waste and barely any fuel.
To give you a taste of the holy grail those scientists and the oligarchs funding them are after:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perpetual_motion
Anonymous
No.3174
3175
>>3172
>and you know what would happen next.
Yeah, only steam.
Anonymous
No.3175
3177
>>3173
Nuclear Fusion is the next best thing to that. Life could be so indulgent in glowniggers didn't keep fear mongering people out of researching nuclear energy. It was Tesla's dream.
>>3174
Steam = electricity = lots of other stuff.
Steam is good.
Anonymous
No.3176
>>3171
>fusion technology is at least 50 years away for commercial deployment.
That's only one generation.
Anonymous
No.3177
3178
>>3175
>lots of other stuff
Yeah, isotope galore ready to be chemically reprocessed for mainly nuclear medicine.
Anonymous
No.3178
3179
>>3177
Also technology adapting to an indulgent surplus of available energy. Electric water desalination could make agriculture easier. Electric mills could synthesize steel and other polymers for cheap. Much faster internet, etc.
Imagine life when electricity costs for most mundane things becomes negligible.
Anonymous
No.3179
3180 3181
>>3178
>Imagine life when electricity costs for most mundane things becomes negligible.
Sorry anon but I believe you are drunk in jewish lies,
Technologies are NOT in humanity hands, but jewish hands. Do you really believe jews will make available such benefits for a negligible price as you fantasize it? Really?
Anonymous
No.3180
3182
>>3179
>implying I'm not involved in the implementation of this infrastructure
I believe they'll do what's profitable. There is a lot of money to be made in this tech.
Jews already own all of the oil rigs and mineral mines and still sell them for energy. If nuclear energy becomes profitable they'll use it too.
Anonymous
No.3181
3183
>>3179
>Jewish hands
Solution: remove Jews. Then we can have nice things.
Anonymous
No.3182
>>3180
>implying I'm not involved in the implementation of this infrastructure
Perhaps, but only to the point of deploying it as a contracted goyim. To be an employee doesn't give the right to own the (((company)))'s tools.
Anonymous
No.3183
3184 3187
238aa21.jpg
>>3181
>Solution: remove Jews.
At this point a fantasy. There are millions on the jew's payroll and most of them are more than willing to kill for a steady flow of shekels.
Anonymous
No.3184
3185
>>3183
So what's your solution?
Anonymous
No.3185
3190
>>3184
Go gray.
Anonymous
No.3187
3189
>>3183
What a cowardly cop-out. Just surrendering to the Jews like a cuck because the battle is up hill.
Anonymous
No.3189
3191
>>3187
Going gray is not surrendering at all fren.
Anonymous
No.3190
3192
>>3185
That's not a solution.
Anonymous
No.3191
>>3189
It is if you allow the kikes to keep stealing everything your ancestors built.
Anonymous
No.3192
3193
>>3190
It is what it is. Make an assessment and act according to it. Remember, your own neighbors will be the first to point at you.
Anonymous
No.3193
3194
>>3192
Whatever you say faggot.
I'm the meantime, I'll be doing my job as usual. Maybe some corporate kikes benefit from it, but that won't stop me from pursuit of artifice.
Anonymous
No.3194
>>3193
Suit yourself.
Anonymous
No.3195
3196
>>3171
Spinning turbines is how you make power moron. All power technology is based on that. Burn coal and it heats water, spins turbine. Windmill directly turns a turbine. Water dams pour water through a turbine. Nuclear power is heating water and turns a turbine. The fuck do you mean it is different?
Anonymous
No.3196
3197 3198
7fbf.jpg
>>3195
>The fuck do you mean it is different?
>illiterate in tech drops his oppinion
Fusion vs Fission ring a bell?
Read the thread again, nigger.
Anonymous
No.3197
>>3196
Nuclear Fusion still produces heat that can fuel a turbine; the mechanics behind the generator is still just boiling water.
Anonymous
No.3198
3199
>>3196
How about you read my post again, double nigger? I said they are the same through turbine electrical generation. You respond with one splits atoms and one combines. Fucking hell you are hopelessly stupid. If a fission reactor can power a sub or aircraft carrier, a fusion one can too, and same goes for a city. Power is power. You get power for one device, it can scale to multiple across a power grid. That is how we have coal that powered a train now powering cities, retard.
Anonymous
No.3199
3200
>>3198
Bump.
Well, somethings are difficult to scale up.
Anonymous
No.3200
>>3199
Scale is normally a problem, but with the power available with nuclear technology, scale isn't really the issue. Cost is. Coal was hard to scale from operating a single engine to operating enough turbines to make sure the power doesn't drop over thousands of homes. Nuclear is far more reliable at scale, but you need all of this tech to make it work. Furthermore, there are better materials that would generate hundreds of times more energy than current material, but because the tech for what we have is already made, no one wants to upgrade and relearn the process.
Anonymous
No.3201
3202
9tu1vun2yf9c1.png

Anonymous
No.3202
image-319.png
>>3201
As a person who works with electricians on a daily basis, can confirm.
Anonymous
No.3203
FB_IMG_1704388494936.jpg

Anonymous
No.3205
File (hide): 29379A626B8BB07D5C6CDF97897B9A25-2733427.mp4 (2.6 MB, Resolution:640x366 Length:00:00:37, html5mediaembed-8o7Dl837Bscl-1.mp4) [play once] [loop]
html5mediaembed-8o7Dl837Bscl-1.mp4

Anonymous
No.3210
File (hide): 7811A51A835817A20E5050067FCBAFDA-3415061.mp4 (3.3 MB, Resolution:618x1100 Length:00:00:25, Wideningcandiedcrafty_00a22d_11234877.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Wideningcandiedcrafty_00a22d_11234877.mp4

Anonymous
No.3211
20240117_020101.jpg

Anonymous
No.3212
e3e3fa40e411f18365f1e44d24e7c23d.jpg

Anonymous
No.3224
https://youtu.be/0r2x7G0hwCw
Anonymous
No.3226
IMG_5476.png.jpg

Anonymous
No.3227
17067178878622835591026340444102-1.jpg

VRIL PONY
No.3232
3233
image.png
>>3141
Anonymous
No.3233
>>3232
Patrician