/cyb/ - Cyberpunk Fiction and Fact

>>2875
That's not the kind of paint that was used in houses.
Also, that's just microwaves.
What frequencies are actually blocked by houses with lead paint?

>>2876
>That's not the kind of paint that was used in houses.
Correct. But the principle is the same. Metallic particles blocking or at least degrading the signal. I guess that an experiment might be done surrounding a router with a cardboard painted with silver paint.

>>2877
>But the principle is the same
It's not really. Just because one kind of wave is blocked by another paint in a different context does not mean that lead paint blocks anything in any notable capacity. Silver is not lead, and the amount of metal in it isn't the same.
Lead paint was removed because rendering the taxpaying population retarded was hurting productivity, and to this day a lot of old lead paint and pipes still remain, and kids raised in those conditions are still being gimped because its not convenient for the government to do anything to stop it.
>surrounding a router with a cardboard painted with silver paint.
Messing with a routers would be the same as shielding an entire house. You would need to get the type of device that the elites supposedly want penetrating the building, build two identical houses (one with lead paint, one without), and tap both of the houses with the device and see if the lead paint has any meaningful impact.

>>2878
>would
*would not

>>2871
You know they sell metal tape. As in strips of metal with sticky stuff you can by and cover a very sizable room making a faraday cage relatively cheaply.
Did you know you can just buy powdered metals.
Or now metal artwork that is metal and wouldn't draw any attention?
You can buy loads of lead is various forms. It's soft and pliable, easy to fix components attaching wires ect. Going into the air.
Like most things it also degrades.
Microwave ovens arn't made of lead.
So while the point of removing lead from paint is the safety hazard because of deteriorating mental stability.
And it's after the wave of lead boosted gas, which I might add did increase efficiency by a large margin, that scared a nation of being poisoned by wide spread 'accepted' things.
Asbestos, radiation ect ect.

Just get tons of scrap metal. Or live in a cargo crate, those are options too.
There's rebar and metal walk ways are surprisingly affordable. It could cost as much as needed for peace of mind.

>>2879
>would not
All right, I found the answer:
https://emfacademy.com/emf-paint/

>>2881
That's not lead paint.

>>2882
>That's not lead paint.
WOW. Did you read all that in less than 45 seconds?

>>2883
No, I've just heard of this stuff before, and I know it's not made of lead.
The lead paint that was taken out of circulation isn't sufficient as shielding paint.

>>2884
>The lead paint that was taken out of circulation isn't sufficient as shielding paint.
I'm sure of that, but it degrades the signal for sure.

>>2880
Faraday Cages require specific materials and angle-of-approach calculations in order to determine which wavelengths can be protected against. For a single room to be entirely shielded you would need an external layer of high carbon (stainless) steel, then extruded aluminum, 99% copper, >95% lead, and an internal layer of low carbon steel sheeting, all of at least 1/20" thickness that completely encloses the walls and ceiling with no gaps.

Would be much more efficient to create a small, selective 'safe' of sorts to shield specific devices.. unless you need a neutron-protected bunker.

>>2885
>but it degrades the signal for sure
... No?
Where did you hear that it degrades the signal? By what margin does it do that?

>>2887
>Where did you hear that it degrades the signal? By what margin does it do that?
Would you mind to do a quick research? Perhaps starting with >>2881 ?

>>2885
Lead paint only contains a tiny amount of lead for color, and doesn't provide any kind of shielding or degrade the signal.
Heck, the wood/brick wall would degrade the signal more than the traces of lead in the paint.
>>2888
That's not lead paint. That's specially made shielding paint with large amounts of shielding materials in it.

>>2889
>That's specially made shielding paint with large amounts of shielding materials in it
Aha! And the shielding materials are...?

>>2891
Not lead, as per the article.
You need to have a high density of material for shielding materials to do anything at all. Tiny traces of lead do nothing.

>>2892
>You need to have a high density of material for shielding
Would you mind to list them then?

>>2893
They're in the same article you posted, ffs.

>>2894
MFW a retarded tries to look smart.

>>2895
Lmao. Now you're just projecting.
You've been saying that poisonous lead was taken off the market just because it could potentially distort certain EMF waves (it can't,; it doesn't have enough lead), when all the non-toxic shielding paints are still on the market.

>>2893
Most EMF paints are made with graphene/graphite as their blocking material.

>>2896
>You've been saying that poisonous lead was taken off the market just because it could potentially distort certain EMF waves
1- Lead being poisonous is still for debate
2- There is a reason antenna's protections are made with fiber glass and not painted polymers.

>>2897
>Most EMF paints are made with graphene/graphite as their blocking material
It might, but I doubt that is the main active component because is way too expensive.

>>2898
>1- Lead being poisonous is still for debate
How? Who is it that contests that lead is poisonous?
Is that what you're saying?
>2- There is a reason antenna's protections are made with fiber glass and not painted polymers.
What's that have to do with lear paint?

>>2900
>What's that have to do with lear paint?
Not exclusively with lead paint, but with many paints containing metals.

>>2899
EMF paint is expensive.
And yes, it is the main blocking ingredient. Look at the article posted above.

>>2902
Dude, as a analogy you can understand. A pharmaceutical pill weights perhaps 0,1 gram, but the active drugs is not more than 0,001 gram.

>>2901
Other non-toxic metals haven't been removed from paint, so that's a moot point.
And lead paint doesn't have enough lead paint to block signals.

Want to test it? Acquire some 1970s lead paint (not hard if you know where to look) and cover a router with a cardboard box painted with it: see absolutely no difference.

>>2903
Drug terminology does not apply to paint.

>>2904
>>2905
Okay. You are right.

>>2906
I guess that's that then.

Idk if I can convince you that lead will fuck you up, but it really is toxic, and I pray for your children if you raise them in a house with it. Don't fall for stupid ticktock memes telling you to paint your house with it. If you want to block EMF waves, get EMF paint.

>>2907
>lead will fuck you up, but it really is toxic
I understand you point of view. The jewish TV told you so.

>>2908
Who told you otherwise?

>>2909
Researching anon. The more you dig, the more worms come out.

>>2908
Better start huffing in those soldering fumes bro.

>>2908
What would Jews have to gain from telling people to that lead is poisonous? A company run by literal Jews marketed it for paint and pipes because they were looking for a profitable way to dispose of their industrial waste, and Americans paid the price.
>>2910
What research did you do?

>>2908
>>2911
Also it'll make the water taste sweeter. Easy sugar substitute.

>>2911
I don't even use lead solder (even though it works well) because my shitty job isn't worth compromising my health for a slight increase in efficiency.

>>2911
That's why you need to research anon. Ingestion is not the same than breathing. An analogy if you don't mind; serpent's venon is lethal if injected, but harmless if swallowed.

>>2915
Lead is poisonous no matter how you get it in your body.
There was a recent study analyzing the baby teeth of children in areas with lead pipes and it was found that lead was building up in their bodies and causing brain damage.

>>2916
>There was a recent study
Ah, the $$$ studies $$$. /s

>>2917
Okay, what's your source of information?

>>2917
You said you researched, and yet your research didn't involve any studies?

>>2918
Sorry anon but I don't carry a database with me.

>>2920
I do.
Give me a name of the report and I'll read it right now, if you're really so certain of the validity of your "research".

>>2921
>I do.
Great, would you mind to research it then?
BTW, zog's sources don't count.

>>2922
What counts as "zog sources" then? Any source that says lead is toxic?
The only research I'm finding refuting the toxicity of lead are 1970'e propaganda funded by the silver refinery that was interested in selling lead.

>>2923
>What counts as "zog sources" then?
Are you even an anon?

>>2922
Tell me what counts as "ZOG" to you and I'll strike it from the search. There's a lot of research about lead toxicity from a lot of different sources.