Let's get this board moving.
/cyb/ - Cyberpunk Fiction and Fact
Cyberpunk is the idea that technology will condemn us to a future of totalitarian nightmares here you can discuss recent events and how technology has been used to facilitate greater control by the elites, or works of fiction
632 replies | 280 files | 87 UUIDs | Page 5
Anonymous
No.1423
>hack into janny's brain
>replace his few happy childhood memories with ylyl videos from /gif/
>replace his few happy childhood memories with ylyl videos from /gif/
Anonymous
No.1440
1643423857_1.mp4 (3.4 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:00:30, VID_20220128_213229.mp4) [play once] [loop]
1643423857_2.webm (6.8 MB, Resolution:852x480 Length:00:02:05, VID_20220128_213239.webm) [play once] [loop]
Anonymous
No.1441
1643424112.mp4 (637.4 KB, Resolution:1920x1080 Length:00:00:30, VID_20220128_214022.mp4) [play once] [loop]
1657526913.png (206.8 KB, 600x737, my_little_enter_the_matrix_by_ultra_the_hedgehog-d4dx84n.png)
Anonymous
No.1474
>>1477
Science is the atheist religion. Its believers rival extremist religious fanatics and is wise to keep them at a distance.
Science is the atheist religion. Its believers rival extremist religious fanatics and is wise to keep them at a distance.
>>1476
is it not cool that we can now see many more things in the sky and see things that we could see before in greater detail than we have?
is it not cool that we can now see many more things in the sky and see things that we could see before in greater detail than we have?
>>1480
>things in the sky
Not sure if you are referring to the Flat Earth thread, but the scope of to put brakes on your enthusiasm about science has to do with the evil brought by it.
See >>>/mlpol/304338 →
>things in the sky
Not sure if you are referring to the Flat Earth thread, but the scope of to put brakes on your enthusiasm about science has to do with the evil brought by it.
See >>>/mlpol/304338 →
>>1481
>the evil brought by it
science is merely a tool, it can be used for both good and evil depending on who's trying to use it for what purpose. After all, the same findings that gave us the atom bomb also gave us the basis for nuclear plants, so to blame science for the actions of men is the same logical niggotry as blaming guns for the actions of people. Don't be a nigger, let us enjoy these new findings.
>the evil brought by it
science is merely a tool, it can be used for both good and evil depending on who's trying to use it for what purpose. After all, the same findings that gave us the atom bomb also gave us the basis for nuclear plants, so to blame science for the actions of men is the same logical niggotry as blaming guns for the actions of people. Don't be a nigger, let us enjoy these new findings.
1658084071.png (230.2 KB, 1076x1024, OugGQdTjZUFvIC5Vi0bJocVfdBnCq2HK3B4SxwhXmzc.png)
>>1483
>Nukes
You realize he probably thinks they're fake, right?
I mean, take a look at the 'rona breads. Sure there is valuable information there, but there's also a fuck ton of schizos.
These fellas have been so thoroughly fucked, that they've even praised Ted Kaczynski at some point. Despite the fact he's a confirmed victim of MK-ultra.
>Nukes
You realize he probably thinks they're fake, right?
I mean, take a look at the 'rona breads. Sure there is valuable information there, but there's also a fuck ton of schizos.
These fellas have been so thoroughly fucked, that they've even praised Ted Kaczynski at some point. Despite the fact he's a confirmed victim of MK-ultra.
>>1484
The flat earthers seem to be faking it for attention. Respond to their bullshit offensively while expending less effort than them, and they ignore you. They want to waste the time of people taking the flat earth "debate" more seriously than them.
The flat earthers seem to be faking it for attention. Respond to their bullshit offensively while expending less effort than them, and they ignore you. They want to waste the time of people taking the flat earth "debate" more seriously than them.
Anonymous
No.1487
>>1481
There's is nothing "evil" about science. Science is a godly pursuit: to better understand and appreciate God's creation. The scientific method is just a tool to learn things about life.
The only """evil""" that comes about it is when corrupt journalists and politicians misattribute scientific terminology to push their individual agendas or spin media narratives. That's not science; it's just politics.
There's is nothing "evil" about science. Science is a godly pursuit: to better understand and appreciate God's creation. The scientific method is just a tool to learn things about life.
The only """evil""" that comes about it is when corrupt journalists and politicians misattribute scientific terminology to push their individual agendas or spin media narratives. That's not science; it's just politics.
>>1479
Science isn't a religion. Most scientists are religious. A lot of the biggest breakthroughs in science have been done by Christians.
Science isn't a religion. Most scientists are religious. A lot of the biggest breakthroughs in science have been done by Christians.
>>1489
>Science isn't a religion.
Buddha isn't a religion either, but his followers turned him into one. Same with science.
>Most scientists are religious.
Gimma a break. Scientists are so invested in their bullshit that are unable to seek knowledge outside their "peer reviewed" sanitized opinions.
>Science isn't a religion.
Buddha isn't a religion either, but his followers turned him into one. Same with science.
>Most scientists are religious.
Gimma a break. Scientists are so invested in their bullshit that are unable to seek knowledge outside their "peer reviewed" sanitized opinions.
>>1486
Notice that the flaggit is posting smug twilight in a thread otherwise unrelated except by mention, rather than face, own up to, or admitting that he has AGAIN been destroyed in his own thread and has abandoned
Notice that the flaggit is posting smug twilight in a thread otherwise unrelated except by mention, rather than face, own up to, or admitting that he has AGAIN been destroyed in his own thread and has abandoned
1658101691.png (75.5 KB, 640x640, tumblr_pbd974yuEt1wypiozo3_640.png)
>>1494
>admitting that he has AGAIN been destroyed in his own thread and has abandoned
Wishful thinking won't change the outcome. Science and specially its spawn, technology, are evil.
>admitting that he has AGAIN been destroyed in his own thread and has abandoned
Wishful thinking won't change the outcome. Science and specially its spawn, technology, are evil.
>>1495
Science is literally just the practice of observing facts.
This is the science board. You can expect people to talk about science here. If you don't like science, just hide and ignore.
Science is literally just the practice of observing facts.
This is the science board. You can expect people to talk about science here. If you don't like science, just hide and ignore.
>>1496
>Science is literally just the practice of observing facts.
Not quite. Humans in their all embracing arrogance want to emulate God. A balance between knowledge and wisdom must be maintained.
>Science is literally just the practice of observing facts.
Not quite. Humans in their all embracing arrogance want to emulate God. A balance between knowledge and wisdom must be maintained.
Anonymous
No.1498
>>1497
Nothing about science excludes what you just said. Science isn't mutually exclusive with faith at all. Only fedora-tipping faggots or defensive retards think it should be.
Nothing about science excludes what you just said. Science isn't mutually exclusive with faith at all. Only fedora-tipping faggots or defensive retards think it should be.
>>1499
>Science isn't mutually exclusive with faith at all.
I'm not religious at all, but science is the fundamental pillar of modern atheism, just saying.
>Science isn't mutually exclusive with faith at all.
I'm not religious at all, but science is the fundamental pillar of modern atheism, just saying.
>>1492
>unable to seek knowledge outside their "peer reviewed" sanitized opinions
Because that's not their jobs. Science is about exoteric knowledge. Spirituality/faith is esoteric knowledge, and can't be understood through scientific study.
Science can only tell you about the observable world around you, which is useful, but isn't a substitute for spirituality.
>unable to seek knowledge outside their "peer reviewed" sanitized opinions
Because that's not their jobs. Science is about exoteric knowledge. Spirituality/faith is esoteric knowledge, and can't be understood through scientific study.
Science can only tell you about the observable world around you, which is useful, but isn't a substitute for spirituality.
>>1501
>Spirituality/faith is esoteric knowledge, and can't be understood through scientific study.
Glad you brought it. Particle physicists have abandoned the scientific method and embraced sorcery.
>Spirituality/faith is esoteric knowledge, and can't be understood through scientific study.
Glad you brought it. Particle physicists have abandoned the scientific method and embraced sorcery.
Anonymous
No.1503
>>1500
Atheists like to say that, but science up to and throughout the 20th century has largely been driven by religious people, often even in the name of religion.
Nomenclature, taxonomy, genealogy, etc. we're led by religious people, who considered it a godly endeavor to understand the world around them, not a contradiction to their faith.
Atheists like to say that, but science up to and throughout the 20th century has largely been driven by religious people, often even in the name of religion.
Nomenclature, taxonomy, genealogy, etc. we're led by religious people, who considered it a godly endeavor to understand the world around them, not a contradiction to their faith.
Anonymous
No.1506
>>1505
>"scientists" use charlatanry and pseudoscience instead of the proven scientific method. By the way, all funded and promoted by their bureaucracies.
On that, we can agree. Pseudoscience is the bane of science.
I wouldn't say that the entire field of particle physics is pseudoscience, but it's full of faggots who keep writing unprovable theoretical nonsense to keep the grants flowing.
>"scientists" use charlatanry and pseudoscience instead of the proven scientific method. By the way, all funded and promoted by their bureaucracies.
On that, we can agree. Pseudoscience is the bane of science.
I wouldn't say that the entire field of particle physics is pseudoscience, but it's full of faggots who keep writing unprovable theoretical nonsense to keep the grants flowing.
Anonymous
No.1507
We are tacking off course. The subject is that technology is evil. Should be a clamp down on science?
https://twitter.com/Sciencenature14/status/1548147070787211267
Is it worth it to make a thread for the telescope pics?
Is it worth it to make a thread for the telescope pics?
>>1511
The flat earth thread is about flat earth arguments. It is not "astrology general", nor does it demand any monopoly on the subject of planets, or photographs thereof.
The flat earth thread is about flat earth arguments. It is not "astrology general", nor does it demand any monopoly on the subject of planets, or photographs thereof.
>>1512
>The flat earth thread is about flat earth arguments.
I've got you. A thread with telescope pics is about the heliocentric theory.
>The flat earth thread is about flat earth arguments.
I've got you. A thread with telescope pics is about the heliocentric theory.
>>1513
I honestly don't care what you call it. I'm not putting the new telescope photos in the flat earth thread. I'll make a telescope thread this week.
I honestly don't care what you call it. I'm not putting the new telescope photos in the flat earth thread. I'll make a telescope thread this week.
1658146652.mp4 (2.3 MB, Resolution:1280x720 Length:00:00:10, MLP_SFM_Scientific_Peer_Reviewed_Study_720p.mp4) [play once] [loop]
>>1521
this, I refuse to believe that people who are legitimately stupid enough to believe that the Earth is flat after multiple millennia (dating all the way back to ancient Greece, in fact) of people knowing that the contrary is true to have any idea of how to actually navigate the internet. Everything else is feds trying to make us look like idiots.
this, I refuse to believe that people who are legitimately stupid enough to believe that the Earth is flat after multiple millennia (dating all the way back to ancient Greece, in fact) of people knowing that the contrary is true to have any idea of how to actually navigate the internet. Everything else is feds trying to make us look like idiots.
Anonymous
No.1523
Anonymous
No.1525
Anonymous
No.1527
Anonymous
No.1531
Foreign intelligence agencies must be rubbing their hands at what potential there now is thanks to the power of diversity hires
What no crop rotation and green fertilization does to a man
Anonymous
No.1536
Anonymous
No.1539
Anonymous
No.1550
1662242225.mp4 (12.7 MB, Resolution:640x480 Length:00:02:54, [YTP] Windows Three Point DOS-2Ec_Vi1HK_g.mp4) [play once] [loop]
![[YTP] Windows Three Point DOS-2Ec_Vi1HK_g.mp4](/images/thumb/1350176FBCA4653064118E7E9FD88781-13364121.png)
>>1534
Explanation to this one is simple: computers are just actual demons trapped inside silicon infrastructures and "enslaved" to the will of the programmer. There is no such thing as artificial intelligence, only demonic intelligence
Explanation to this one is simple: computers are just actual demons trapped inside silicon infrastructures and "enslaved" to the will of the programmer. There is no such thing as artificial intelligence, only demonic intelligence
>>1557
>computers are just actual demons trapped inside silicon infrastructures and "enslaved" to the will of the programmer.
I'm thinking in the nature of electricity, magnetism, and the atomic "theory" (never ever anyponer has seen an atom, let alone an electron).
>computers are just actual demons trapped inside silicon infrastructures and "enslaved" to the will of the programmer.
I'm thinking in the nature of electricity, magnetism, and the atomic "theory" (never ever anyponer has seen an atom, let alone an electron).
>>1558
>(never ever anyponer has seen an atom, let alone an electron)
You do realize that there are other ways to indicate that something exists other than direct empiricism, right? Setting the bar to only things you can see with the naked eye is an impossible standard of evidence.
>(never ever anyponer has seen an atom, let alone an electron)
You do realize that there are other ways to indicate that something exists other than direct empiricism, right? Setting the bar to only things you can see with the naked eye is an impossible standard of evidence.
>>1557
>There is no such thing as artificial intelligence
Artificial intelligence is just a series of algorithms and input-output flowcharts. At what point in the process does there even need to be a 'demon' if that demon only amounts to a glorified button-presser?
>There is no such thing as artificial intelligence
Artificial intelligence is just a series of algorithms and input-output flowcharts. At what point in the process does there even need to be a 'demon' if that demon only amounts to a glorified button-presser?
Anonymous
No.1563
Ah, wait, it seems the irony of that post was lost on me.
>>1561
>You do realize that there are other ways to indicate that something exists other than direct empiricism, right?
Of course. That exactly the reason why assumptions are labeled "theories".
>You do realize that there are other ways to indicate that something exists other than direct empiricism, right?
Of course. That exactly the reason why assumptions are labeled "theories".
>>1562
>Artificial intelligence is just a series of algorithms and input-output flowcharts.
Correct. AI is mostly a buzzword.
>At what point in the process does there even need to be a 'demon' if that demon only amounts to a glorified button-presser?
If the idea of demons inside chips is correct, then demons are tasked to move electrical states from buffer to buffer, like NAND and NOR gates and alike.
>Artificial intelligence is just a series of algorithms and input-output flowcharts.
Correct. AI is mostly a buzzword.
>At what point in the process does there even need to be a 'demon' if that demon only amounts to a glorified button-presser?
If the idea of demons inside chips is correct, then demons are tasked to move electrical states from buffer to buffer, like NAND and NOR gates and alike.
Anonymous
No.1566
>>1565
>If the idea of demons inside chips is correct, then demons are tasked to move electrical states from buffer to buffer, like NAND and NOR gates and alike.
We are getting closer and closer to the autistic ASSEMBLER language.
>If the idea of demons inside chips is correct, then demons are tasked to move electrical states from buffer to buffer, like NAND and NOR gates and alike.
We are getting closer and closer to the autistic ASSEMBLER language.
>>1564
>assumptions
Theories are based on evidence and logic, not assumption. An assumption is just a hypothesis.
>assumptions
Theories are based on evidence and logic, not assumption. An assumption is just a hypothesis.
>>1565
>demons are tasked to move electrical states from buffer to buffer, like NAND and NOR gates and alike.
Why would you even need demons for such a menial, unintelligent task? We have circuit boards.
>demons are tasked to move electrical states from buffer to buffer, like NAND and NOR gates and alike.
Why would you even need demons for such a menial, unintelligent task? We have circuit boards.
Anonymous
No.1571
>>1569
>An assumption is just a hypothesis.
Correct, and in science those hypothesis are labeled theories. Because science is never settled and is always evolving, those assumptions/theories/hypothesis are expected to be demolished and replaced by new ones.
>An assumption is just a hypothesis.
Correct, and in science those hypothesis are labeled theories. Because science is never settled and is always evolving, those assumptions/theories/hypothesis are expected to be demolished and replaced by new ones.
>>1573
An hypothesis is an assumption before research/experimentation, a theory is made to explain data generated from said research. Get it right faggot.
An hypothesis is an assumption before research/experimentation, a theory is made to explain data generated from said research. Get it right faggot.
Anonymous
No.1576
Anonymous
No.1593
>>1573
>in science those hypothesis are labeled theories
That's not science at all. That's just positivism and corporate media manipulation. Don't misconstrue pseudoscience with actual science.
Theories are based on evidence and data. They're subject to change as new discoveries are made, but they're more than just assumptions.
>in science those hypothesis are labeled theories
That's not science at all. That's just positivism and corporate media manipulation. Don't misconstrue pseudoscience with actual science.
Theories are based on evidence and data. They're subject to change as new discoveries are made, but they're more than just assumptions.
Anonymous
No.1596
>>1595
It makes you wonder, what the fuck is going on inside those silicon layers and on the disk's platters.
It makes you wonder, what the fuck is going on inside those silicon layers and on the disk's platters.
>>1570
>Why would you even need demons for such a menial, unintelligent task? We have circuit boards.
It is possible demons are using the electric devices as portals to our realm.
>Why would you even need demons for such a menial, unintelligent task? We have circuit boards.
It is possible demons are using the electric devices as portals to our realm.
>>1597
Why would demons need electrical devices to do such a thing? What component of the device is the portal?
Why would demons need electrical devices to do such a thing? What component of the device is the portal?
Anonymous
No.1603
>>1602
No, I didn't yet. I was asking you what your take from it was before if I decide that this is worth 10 minutes of my time.
No, I didn't yet. I was asking you what your take from it was before if I decide that this is worth 10 minutes of my time.
1662520289.png (495.2 KB, 1080x1220, Screenshot_20220906-231059.png)
>>1604
Pretty much this.
Also it gets interesting when you consider the almost exponential increasing of hard drives' capacity. When you dismount an old unit and compare it against the new ones, and consider the platter' surface square millimeters involved, there is something really fishy about it.
Pretty much this.
Also it gets interesting when you consider the almost exponential increasing of hard drives' capacity. When you dismount an old unit and compare it against the new ones, and consider the platter' surface square millimeters involved, there is something really fishy about it.
>>1608
>platter' surface square millimeters involved, there is something really fishy about it
Not really, tbh. Microstructures and material engineering drastically multiply surface area.
>platter' surface square millimeters involved, there is something really fishy about it
Not really, tbh. Microstructures and material engineering drastically multiply surface area.
>>1610
>Microstructures and material engineering
After the covid psyop, science and scientists lost all credibility. Any claim is in doubt and needs independent assessment, even the very foundations of matter, such us the periodic table.
>Microstructures and material engineering
After the covid psyop, science and scientists lost all credibility. Any claim is in doubt and needs independent assessment, even the very foundations of matter, such us the periodic table.
>>1612
>independent assessment
What kind of independent assessment? Who would do it?
These aren't studies observed by scientists; they're products made by engineers.
>independent assessment
What kind of independent assessment? Who would do it?
These aren't studies observed by scientists; they're products made by engineers.
>>1612
>science and scientists lost all credibility. Any claim is in doubt and needs independent assessment
That's what the peer review process is. Scientists review eachothers work all of the time. Sometimes they disagree, and sometimes they reaffirm studies.
>science and scientists lost all credibility. Any claim is in doubt and needs independent assessment
That's what the peer review process is. Scientists review eachothers work all of the time. Sometimes they disagree, and sometimes they reaffirm studies.
Anonymous
No.1616
>>1613
>What kind of independent assessment? Who would do it?
>These aren't studies observed by scientists; they're products made by engineers.
Let us see an example of independent assessment on science. Easily reproducible and ridiculous cheap.
If the experiment can be replicated, then all those "scientists" and "engineers" are making assumptions on the foundations of false theories. Let's watch.
>What kind of independent assessment? Who would do it?
>These aren't studies observed by scientists; they're products made by engineers.
Let us see an example of independent assessment on science. Easily reproducible and ridiculous cheap.
If the experiment can be replicated, then all those "scientists" and "engineers" are making assumptions on the foundations of false theories. Let's watch.
Anonymous
No.1618
>>1617
>If the experiment can be replicated,
Do you really expect corporations to reveal the designs for their patented products? It's already hard enough to prevent chunks from stealing them.
>If the experiment can be replicated,
Do you really expect corporations to reveal the designs for their patented products? It's already hard enough to prevent chunks from stealing them.
Anonymous
No.1619
>>1617
I don't see the part where it implies demons are involved.
Even if they're keep secrets about methods, there's little evidence to suggest that it's anything special other than structural/material engineering on a small scale.
I don't see the part where it implies demons are involved.
Even if they're keep secrets about methods, there's little evidence to suggest that it's anything special other than structural/material engineering on a small scale.
Anonymous
No.1621
Dall-E is weird
Anonymous
No.1640
1662949213.jpg (32.9 KB, 720x400, 3BkT7ReQQAOENUwClDYt45OSVxomrmwn7tEZzNkbRBc.jpg)
>>1610
>Not really, tbh. Microstructures and material engineering drastically multiply surface area.
>hard drives having insane capacities
That is what we are told. Closer inspection of a mechanic arm and its magnetic reader put in doubt the "scientific" narrative.
>Not really, tbh. Microstructures and material engineering drastically multiply surface area.
>hard drives having insane capacities
That is what we are told. Closer inspection of a mechanic arm and its magnetic reader put in doubt the "scientific" narrative.
>>1643
>Closer inspection of a mechanic arm and its magnetic reader put in doubt the "scientific" narrative.
What are you talking about?
>Closer inspection of a mechanic arm and its magnetic reader put in doubt the "scientific" narrative.
What are you talking about?
>>1684
I think anon was talking about square surface, track's dimensions, and surface's properties to storage digital data; plus the capacity of the magnetic reader to discriminate among tracks.
I think anon was talking about square surface, track's dimensions, and surface's properties to storage digital data; plus the capacity of the magnetic reader to discriminate among tracks.
>>1686
I believe it is about fake science not able to perform as published and therefore something fishy inside the hardware.
I believe it is about fake science not able to perform as published and therefore something fishy inside the hardware.
>>1690
>A theory is based on evidence and testing
Evidence shows that behind the eyes limitations there is another realm and the beings living there my cross to ours under certain conditions and cause physical manifestations.
>A theory is based on evidence and testing
Evidence shows that behind the eyes limitations there is another realm and the beings living there my cross to ours under certain conditions and cause physical manifestations.
Anonymous
No.1692
>>1691
There's still no evidence to suggest that record players are somehow powered by demons, let alone testing.
There's still no evidence to suggest that record players are somehow powered by demons, let alone testing.
Anonymous
No.1695
>>1694
I didn't say that, nigger. I am naturally skeptical of ideas that suggest that my phone is powered by demons.
>cannot see
Nobody can "see" that sort of thing, retard. It's not exoteric knowledge, it's esoteric: it is not empirical evidence that you can see. So when you say you have "evidence" of it, please explain what evidence it is you have, because that would be fascinating.
I didn't say that, nigger. I am naturally skeptical of ideas that suggest that my phone is powered by demons.
>cannot see
Nobody can "see" that sort of thing, retard. It's not exoteric knowledge, it's esoteric: it is not empirical evidence that you can see. So when you say you have "evidence" of it, please explain what evidence it is you have, because that would be fascinating.
Anonymous
No.1760
>>1759
>>1759
>The year is 2030.
>Yet another brownout hits the town, so you decide to go for a ride in your new car.
>You hop into your Tesla Dilatrix Sport™ to go buy some soy beer brewed only by the most righteous of crippled nigger trannies. To purchase anything else would result in you receiving a -100 point deduction to your Social Banking Score.
>You're forced to watch an advertisement before your self-driving car can enter drive mode.
>"Did you know that you could receive a 5% tax credit after receiving your proof of sterilization? Learn more at IRS.gov."
>You almost make it to the store only be intercepted by peaceful protestors blockading the streets.
>You try to run out of your car and escape by foot before it is swarmed by future engineers and surgeons, but its pedestrian safety programming renders it immobile. All auxillary functions are disabled. You're trapped.
"Kill whitey!"
>Your windows are smashed and you are dragged out of your car by the mob.
>You fall to the ground before viciously attacking an innocent, unarmed black man's brick with the back of your head as you try to flee.
>Organ donation is now mandatory in the name of social equity and your flesh is used to create faux vaginas for autogynephiles.
>>1759
>The year is 2030.
>Yet another brownout hits the town, so you decide to go for a ride in your new car.
>You hop into your Tesla Dilatrix Sport™ to go buy some soy beer brewed only by the most righteous of crippled nigger trannies. To purchase anything else would result in you receiving a -100 point deduction to your Social Banking Score.
>You're forced to watch an advertisement before your self-driving car can enter drive mode.
>"Did you know that you could receive a 5% tax credit after receiving your proof of sterilization? Learn more at IRS.gov."
>You almost make it to the store only be intercepted by peaceful protestors blockading the streets.
>You try to run out of your car and escape by foot before it is swarmed by future engineers and surgeons, but its pedestrian safety programming renders it immobile. All auxillary functions are disabled. You're trapped.
"Kill whitey!"
>Your windows are smashed and you are dragged out of your car by the mob.
>You fall to the ground before viciously attacking an innocent, unarmed black man's brick with the back of your head as you try to flee.
>Organ donation is now mandatory in the name of social equity and your flesh is used to create faux vaginas for autogynephiles.
Anonymous
No.1768
Anonymous
No.1859
1665193060.mp4 (18.8 MB, Resolution:1280x720 Length:00:01:28, fe47a1c87cbe0a0a.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Anonymous
No.1885
1665279022.mp4 (5.8 MB, Resolution:640x766 Length:00:01:25, de71b320c1ceee3cea672a669d1e79b25e08035f0cc5fb99f55dc448365d8374_1.mp4) [play once] [loop]
>>1949
Why would you consider the technology that can improve human cognition and athletic ability to be a tranny meme? I understand there are a lot of troons in the biohacking scene and that a lot of that stuff is over hyped but that tech is making leaps and bounds. That technology could be very useful and it's biotech that isn't in the hands of major pharmaceutical companies, surely that is something good.
Also with more major advancements it could be used for pony waifu.
Why would you consider the technology that can improve human cognition and athletic ability to be a tranny meme? I understand there are a lot of troons in the biohacking scene and that a lot of that stuff is over hyped but that tech is making leaps and bounds. That technology could be very useful and it's biotech that isn't in the hands of major pharmaceutical companies, surely that is something good.
Also with more major advancements it could be used for pony waifu.
Anonymous
No.1955
>>1948
I think it's interesting enough to warrant it's own thread, if you have anything to say about it.
I think it's interesting enough to warrant it's own thread, if you have anything to say about it.
Anonymous
No.1957
>>1953
I'm not terribly familiar with it, but it I only ever inadvertently stumble across it when it's some random tranny wanting a robot pussy or something. People who are unhappy about their biology and use transhumanism as an autistic cope.
>That technology could be very useful and it's biotech that isn't in the hands of major pharmaceutical companies, surely that is something good.
I just don't trust it and I can only see it being used against my race.
>>1956
This.
I'm not terribly familiar with it, but it I only ever inadvertently stumble across it when it's some random tranny wanting a robot pussy or something. People who are unhappy about their biology and use transhumanism as an autistic cope.
>That technology could be very useful and it's biotech that isn't in the hands of major pharmaceutical companies, surely that is something good.
I just don't trust it and I can only see it being used against my race.
>>1956
This.
Anonymous
No.1959
>>1948
Sounds kind of like a fantasy buzzword to me, but I admittedly know quite little about it. Genetic engineering takes years, but I guess with advancements in tech it could some day be done quite rapidly.
Sounds kind of like a fantasy buzzword to me, but I admittedly know quite little about it. Genetic engineering takes years, but I guess with advancements in tech it could some day be done quite rapidly.
Anonymous
No.1975
>>1958
You know you can buy some of the equipment online, right? Like you can get an open source EEG for $200 or a tDCS device for around $100. It's something anyone can do and it's not terribly expensive.
You know you can buy some of the equipment online, right? Like you can get an open source EEG for $200 or a tDCS device for around $100. It's something anyone can do and it's not terribly expensive.
Anonymous
No.1978
Anonymous
No.1983
>>1982
If all necessary resources, funding, researchers and attention were allocated towards it and all ethical standards and obstacles were bulldozed, plausibly.
If all necessary resources, funding, researchers and attention were allocated towards it and all ethical standards and obstacles were bulldozed, plausibly.
1666228898_1.png (821.8 KB, 843x1022, Screenshot_20221019-202039_Video_Player.png)
1666228898_2.png (787.4 KB, 878x1013, Screenshot_20221019-202032_Video_Player.png)
Space Age fashion mare
Anonymous
No.2005
1666245898_1.jpg (86.1 KB, 618x618, JjSYaL5R_amp_big_s-618x618.jpeg)
1666245898_2.jpg (132.7 KB, 618x971, da74f2591d82aa75d134ebcfe00fc662-618x971.jpeg)
Anonymous
No.2006
Anonymous
No.2036
Anonymous
No.2112
1667000566.mp4 (13.1 MB, Resolution:426x230 Length:00:02:30, VID_20221028_194113.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Anonymous
No.2113
I'm surprised that I don't see more bronies on alogs.space/robowaifu. Seems like quadruped sexbots would solve a lot of engineering problems.
1667393606.png (2.3 MB, 2048x1562, unknown - 2022-11-02T085254.118.png)
>>2146
I've been watching some Cowboy Bebop lately: the setting has every planet in the solar system fully terraformed and inhabited by peaceful, agrarian rural societies by 2070. It's fantasy, but it's also pretty nice.
I've been watching some Cowboy Bebop lately: the setting has every planet in the solar system fully terraformed and inhabited by peaceful, agrarian rural societies by 2070. It's fantasy, but it's also pretty nice.
Anonymous
No.2148
Environments are so messy in Cowboy Bebop and I think it's interesting that old people react to it with "omg this world feels so organic and lived in and natural" while younger people react with "jesus christ doesnt anyone clean in this universe? Why is everyone a fucking junkie? Christ some kid's playing the harmonica in a smoking room".
>>2136
I get why small viruses aren't considered life but I just don't understand why giant viruses are considered nonliving while intracellular oblobigate bacteria like rickettsia are considered to be alive.
I get why small viruses aren't considered life but I just don't understand why giant viruses are considered nonliving while intracellular oblobigate bacteria like rickettsia are considered to be alive.
>>2157
It's not really a question of size, but functionality. Viruses have no capability to reproduce on their own, and no biologica funtions other than to stick to and infect host cells. They technically can't even move on their own. They don't move, breed, eat, breath or fuck: they're better described as objects than living things; plausibly the vestige of some bygone cell-signalling method gone horribly wrong.
It's not really a question of size, but functionality. Viruses have no capability to reproduce on their own, and no biologica funtions other than to stick to and infect host cells. They technically can't even move on their own. They don't move, breed, eat, breath or fuck: they're better described as objects than living things; plausibly the vestige of some bygone cell-signalling method gone horribly wrong.
>>2158
>Viruses have no capability to reproduce on their own, and no biologica funtions other than to stick to and infect host cells.
This is is also true of intracellular obligate bacteria.
>They don't move, breed, eat, breath or fuck: they're better described as objects than living things; plausibly the vestige of some bygone cell-signalling method gone horribly wrong.
Giant viruses have all the nessicary genes for metabolism.
>Viruses have no capability to reproduce on their own, and no biologica funtions other than to stick to and infect host cells.
This is is also true of intracellular obligate bacteria.
>They don't move, breed, eat, breath or fuck: they're better described as objects than living things; plausibly the vestige of some bygone cell-signalling method gone horribly wrong.
Giant viruses have all the nessicary genes for metabolism.
Anonymous
No.2171
>>2170
>have all the nessicary genes for metabolism.
What? What kinds of metabolic functions do they even have? Do they have any catabolic or anabolic activities?
>have all the nessicary genes for metabolism.
What? What kinds of metabolic functions do they even have? Do they have any catabolic or anabolic activities?
1668281957.jpg (142.4 KB, 1080x1708, Screenshot_20221112_102347.jpg)
Anonymous
No.2198
>>2197
Nice joke!
"Storing explosions and taking them home to put them somewhere more useful" indeed. We can get hydrogen from places far less dangerous than the sun.
Nice joke!
"Storing explosions and taking them home to put them somewhere more useful" indeed. We can get hydrogen from places far less dangerous than the sun.
Anonymous
No.2220
1668487892.mp4 (2.9 MB, Resolution:268x476 Length:00:00:14, Stormyuppitydolphin_c38794_8165416.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Anonymous
No.2261
1669213725.webm (6.3 MB, Resolution:978x550 Length:00:01:38, Stars_Size_Comparison.webm) [play once] [loop]
Anonymous
No.2379
1675332817.mp4 (3.6 MB, Resolution:464x854 Length:00:00:52, What really happens when you click I'm not a robot verification.mp4) [play once] [loop]
What really happens when you click "I'm not a robot" verification button.
Anonymous
No.2394
Do you think JEWISH NIGGER BOTS are going to be a thing one day? Just niggering along with swinging arms and spinning hands going "BEEP BOOP, I AM A NIGGER. TAKE ME TO YOUR WHITE WOMEN". It plays shitty rap out of every orfice in its body at once. It runs into walls. It runs into people and attacks them and calls the cops on them if they can't be beat by the niggerbot. Nobody can hack the program to make it hate niggers.
1675604911.png (233.9 KB, 512x661, On the Esoteric Aspects of Technology.png)
On the Esoteric Aspects of Technology.
Anonymous
No.2397
>>2395
>the intersection of computer technology and what we knot about demons suggests that demons are waveforms
yeah, I'm gonna need a source on that because that sounds pretty fake and gay.
>the intersection of computer technology and what we knot about demons suggests that demons are waveforms
yeah, I'm gonna need a source on that because that sounds pretty fake and gay.
1675812864.png (670.2 KB, 1280x539, twilight - teaching on the board.png)
>>2399
>that sounds pretty fake and gay
The proof is evident and pretty straightforward. Everything that manifest into the physical realm has an associated waveform, a crude example of that is the intrinsic resonance of all matter.
Physics and Magick 101.
>that sounds pretty fake and gay
The proof is evident and pretty straightforward. Everything that manifest into the physical realm has an associated waveform, a crude example of that is the intrinsic resonance of all matter.
Physics and Magick 101.
>>2400
Associated waveform of what? What is creating the wave? What is the frequency of this wave? What is happening enough to show a frequency at all?
You're not using words that are commonly defined, you're using words from Deepak Chopra and getting smug that we don't understand your gobbledygook.
Associated waveform of what? What is creating the wave? What is the frequency of this wave? What is happening enough to show a frequency at all?
You're not using words that are commonly defined, you're using words from Deepak Chopra and getting smug that we don't understand your gobbledygook.
>>2401
>You're not using words that are commonly defined
I'm sorry, I don't have the proper reference at hand but I found something that might help.
>Resonant Frequencies
>Every physical system has a resonant frequency.
https://julianstaylor.medium.com/resonant-frequencies-584fdd5ccb91
>Explained: AS350 Eurocopter Helicopter Self-Destructs - 1:29 long
[YouTube] Explained: AS350 Eurocopter Helicopter Self-Destructs![]()
>Helicopter Tested to Destruction
[YouTube] Helicopter Tested to Destruction![]()
The above gives you a glimpse on the mundane scale, the Earth has its own frequency at macro scale, and going to the micro scale we enter into the electric semiconductors' realm where funny things begin to happen. Suffice to say that if demonic activity can be felt, then that presence must be accompanied by a resonance, also the inverse might be valid.
>You're not using words that are commonly defined
I'm sorry, I don't have the proper reference at hand but I found something that might help.
>Resonant Frequencies
>Every physical system has a resonant frequency.
https://julianstaylor.medium.com/resonant-frequencies-584fdd5ccb91
>Explained: AS350 Eurocopter Helicopter Self-Destructs - 1:29 long
[YouTube] Explained: AS350 Eurocopter Helicopter Self-Destructs
>Helicopter Tested to Destruction
[YouTube] Helicopter Tested to Destruction
The above gives you a glimpse on the mundane scale, the Earth has its own frequency at macro scale, and going to the micro scale we enter into the electric semiconductors' realm where funny things begin to happen. Suffice to say that if demonic activity can be felt, then that presence must be accompanied by a resonance, also the inverse might be valid.
>>2402
Thanks anon, I guess I'll look into it this week. Also, forgot to mention, I'm not the anon who said it was fake and gay. I'm genuinely interested in the possibility, just not convinced yet.
Thanks anon, I guess I'll look into it this week. Also, forgot to mention, I'm not the anon who said it was fake and gay. I'm genuinely interested in the possibility, just not convinced yet.
Anonymous
No.2404
1675841991.jpg (133.6 KB, 1600x759, 7a417549f5bd7bccf275f305c3fd6194.jpg)
>>2403
Remember, vibration (resonance) is energy manifested in many forms. Look at the graphic for the whole spectrum.
Remember, vibration (resonance) is energy manifested in many forms. Look at the graphic for the whole spectrum.
>>2395
>>2400
>Everything that's a wave is spiritual.
In the days of the birth of the internet a group of people did an experiment to banish any demons (paranormal/spiritual beings) from hardware/software. Things crashed and the connection cut before the planet wide banishment occurred fully.
There is correlation of spiritual matters and material matters that's been known for ages.
>>2402
>Waves can do cool stuff.
Like matter and waveforms, beings that are spiritual do also exhibit those qualities barring the stranger ones but those ones aren't a concern right now.
What can be tested is physical effects of stuff made of matter behaving differently when compared to matter that has such beings and when compared to matter in a zone designed to block such beings.
A huge issue is accounting for all the variables and errors.
There's much more than just String Theory but also Spiritual.
>>2400
>Everything that's a wave is spiritual.
In the days of the birth of the internet a group of people did an experiment to banish any demons (paranormal/spiritual beings) from hardware/software. Things crashed and the connection cut before the planet wide banishment occurred fully.
There is correlation of spiritual matters and material matters that's been known for ages.
>>2402
>Waves can do cool stuff.
Like matter and waveforms, beings that are spiritual do also exhibit those qualities barring the stranger ones but those ones aren't a concern right now.
What can be tested is physical effects of stuff made of matter behaving differently when compared to matter that has such beings and when compared to matter in a zone designed to block such beings.
A huge issue is accounting for all the variables and errors.
There's much more than just String Theory but also Spiritual.
>>2405
To clarify pinning everything as demons (or anything spiritual) be physical waveforms is a stretch without any evidence.
What is known is that the physical and genuinely spiritual do interact.
To clarify pinning everything as demons (or anything spiritual) be physical waveforms is a stretch without any evidence.
What is known is that the physical and genuinely spiritual do interact.
>>2406
>is a stretch without any evidence
Sure, I agree. That said, intuition and telepathy lack evidence too, and yet we feel and even use them everyday.
>is a stretch without any evidence
Sure, I agree. That said, intuition and telepathy lack evidence too, and yet we feel and even use them everyday.
>>2408
Not quite.
Intuition doesn't depend on the senses, and can alert on something happening remotely. Some people have it, some don't.
Not quite.
Intuition doesn't depend on the senses, and can alert on something happening remotely. Some people have it, some don't.
>>1488
I second >>1493 over there in respecting your digits and congratulating you on an absolutely fantastic post.
I'm trying to work through a certain kind of religion-related thing here, and I'm seeing a ton of new layers to just about every idea. Your post really hits the spot on a number of angles and made connections in my head that I'd never made before. Thanks for that.
I second >>1493 over there in respecting your digits and congratulating you on an absolutely fantastic post.
I'm trying to work through a certain kind of religion-related thing here, and I'm seeing a ton of new layers to just about every idea. Your post really hits the spot on a number of angles and made connections in my head that I'd never made before. Thanks for that.
Dividing by 0 (zero) with a 1950 calculator.
Anonymous
No.2539
>>2538
I believe it is the same mechanism used by other mechanical brands, the machine goes crazy for 2 or 3 minutes and returns ERROR printed in red ink, if I remember well.
I believe it is the same mechanism used by other mechanical brands, the machine goes crazy for 2 or 3 minutes and returns ERROR printed in red ink, if I remember well.
>>2542
This is what happens when money mixes with science, all the moral boundaries are jettisoned in a blink.
This is what happens when money mixes with science, all the moral boundaries are jettisoned in a blink.
>>2545
I think the point is to create coherent messages from neural networks. It's pretty groundbreaking for the future of cybernetics and/or other computation. Being able to translate an image from electrodes hooked to brainwaves is a pretty big deal. Those images are clearly faces, and recognizably monkey faces (the dark eyeholes, pronounced browline and pale face surrounded by darker colors are a dead giveaway): the machine was able to interpret images from the monkey's memory and imagination by analyzing the part of its brain that produces abstract thoughts.
I think the point is to create coherent messages from neural networks. It's pretty groundbreaking for the future of cybernetics and/or other computation. Being able to translate an image from electrodes hooked to brainwaves is a pretty big deal. Those images are clearly faces, and recognizably monkey faces (the dark eyeholes, pronounced browline and pale face surrounded by darker colors are a dead giveaway): the machine was able to interpret images from the monkey's memory and imagination by analyzing the part of its brain that produces abstract thoughts.
Anonymous
No.2555
>>2547
>you are simping for it..
Learn to read, faggot. What part of my post said that I approved of this? I said it was a breakthrough, not that it's good.
>i don't want these faggots to be able to read thoughts
Well, it looks like they already can, to a certain extent.
>you are simping for it..
Learn to read, faggot. What part of my post said that I approved of this? I said it was a breakthrough, not that it's good.
>i don't want these faggots to be able to read thoughts
Well, it looks like they already can, to a certain extent.
Anonymous
No.2556
>>2547
>They were alive then?
Yes, or at least mostly alive. If they were dead they wouldn't have thoughts to read.
>They were alive then?
Yes, or at least mostly alive. If they were dead they wouldn't have thoughts to read.
Anonymous
No.2557
>>2410
A lot of that is retroactive confirmation bias, a subconscious coping method that helps people deal with the unknown and unrelenting chaos of the Clownworld we live in.
A lot of that is retroactive confirmation bias, a subconscious coping method that helps people deal with the unknown and unrelenting chaos of the Clownworld we live in.
Anonymous
No.2567
1684459702_2.jpg (54.9 KB, 900x504, rs-130217-8track-1800-1394932506.jpg)
Ahem.
I'm sure most of (you) have no idea what are these.
I'm sure most of (you) have no idea what are these.
Anonymous
No.2582
Anonymous
No.2590
>>2589
And that's the irony frens.
Stupidity is innate and not amount of information or education will make it go away.
And that's the irony frens.
Stupidity is innate and not amount of information or education will make it go away.
Anonymous
No.2596
1686953326.webm (3.5 MB, Resolution:982x720 Length:00:01:00, Wide World Of Web - Online Dating.webm) [play once] [loop]
>>2616
>$2999
>in the 80s
>with just enough processing power to play games like Berzerk
My god, computers used to be stupidly inaccessible. Really puts things into perspective doesn't it?
>$2999
>in the 80s
>with just enough processing power to play games like Berzerk
My god, computers used to be stupidly inaccessible. Really puts things into perspective doesn't it?
Anonymous
No.2623
>>2622
>Please do not lower my polygon count
>Actually, I prefer my low polygon count now, thank you
Postal Brain Damaged is fun if you like modern boomershooters, btw, I enjoyed it a lot
>Please do not lower my polygon count
>Actually, I prefer my low polygon count now, thank you
Postal Brain Damaged is fun if you like modern boomershooters, btw, I enjoyed it a lot
Anonymous
No.2624
>>2618
>2 docks for diskettes
Giving it a second look, those are the first 5 inches diskettes, later came the 3 inches ones with more capacity. That machine is a true dinosaur.
>2 docks for diskettes
Giving it a second look, those are the first 5 inches diskettes, later came the 3 inches ones with more capacity. That machine is a true dinosaur.
>>2616
>start at $2999
Which was a toy for a kid, to run any serious program the bells and whistles were required, jumping to $5000.
>start at $2999
Which was a toy for a kid, to run any serious program the bells and whistles were required, jumping to $5000.
>>2625
To be fair, in 1983 there wasn’t really a dedicated market for gaming PCs. Early personal computers were like early cell phones, in that most people who bought them were either professionals who needed them for some legitimate business reason, or else rich consoomers who just wanted to own the latest gadget. Games for PCs existed but they were super primitive and mostly text based. Video game culture was still mainly in the arcades. I think home consoles also started appearing at this time. Either way, only serious geeks owned home computers for gaming, and most gamers were also programmers. The Commodore 64 was the most popular rig for this type of hobbyist, and that was much more reasonably priced.
To be fair, in 1983 there wasn’t really a dedicated market for gaming PCs. Early personal computers were like early cell phones, in that most people who bought them were either professionals who needed them for some legitimate business reason, or else rich consoomers who just wanted to own the latest gadget. Games for PCs existed but they were super primitive and mostly text based. Video game culture was still mainly in the arcades. I think home consoles also started appearing at this time. Either way, only serious geeks owned home computers for gaming, and most gamers were also programmers. The Commodore 64 was the most popular rig for this type of hobbyist, and that was much more reasonably priced.
Anonymous
No.2627
>>2626
>Video game culture was still mainly in the arcades.
That machine, in vanilla configuration, could run only games in the Pong category.
>Video game culture was still mainly in the arcades.
That machine, in vanilla configuration, could run only games in the Pong category.
Anonymous
No.2665
The mystery if Pi.
In the video the following statement: “Where ever there is Pi, there is a hidden circle.”
Interesting thought in regards to Pi and the ECM.
An apparent mystery for physics and math fags.
>The most unexpected answer to a counting puzzle
[YouTube] The most unexpected answer to a counting puzzle![]()
In the video the following statement: “Where ever there is Pi, there is a hidden circle.”
Interesting thought in regards to Pi and the ECM.
An apparent mystery for physics and math fags.
>The most unexpected answer to a counting puzzle
[YouTube] The most unexpected answer to a counting puzzle
Anonymous
No.2666
>dependencies
No matter what language you program in or what applications you use: everything you do with a computer today is powered at some level by a piece of C/C++ code.
No matter what language you program in or what applications you use: everything you do with a computer today is powered at some level by a piece of C/C++ code.
1693080317_2.jpg (63.2 KB, 811x811, wow-dog-mlp-mlp-песочница-my-little-pony-1083211.jpeg)
>>2701
>India went to the moon
>turbo bullshit
Do you realize that India just re-discovered the long lost NASA's technologies?
>India went to the moon
>turbo bullshit
Do you realize that India just re-discovered the long lost NASA's technologies?
>>2702
That's not even the same technology. Landing a rocket on the moon is a lot easier than putting a person on it.
Also it's not "long lost". It was just dismantled due to lack of continued interest/funding.
That's not even the same technology. Landing a rocket on the moon is a lot easier than putting a person on it.
Also it's not "long lost". It was just dismantled due to lack of continued interest/funding.
Anonymous
No.2704
1693096416.mp4 (433.9 KB, Resolution:600x360 Length:00:00:14, Repeatingtenuousequable_a99135_10823596.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Anonymous
No.2705
>>2703
>That's not even the same technology.
It is all the same tech, even old and contemporary. A rocket with gyro assisted guidance,
>That's not even the same technology.
It is all the same tech, even old and contemporary. A rocket with gyro assisted guidance,
Anonymous
No.2707
1693190082.png (1.2 MB, 640x3413, 8649F6C3A68219E256AF8FB0F32BF541-1238525.png)
Anonymous
No.2708
Anonymous
No.2731
1694730383.mp4 (2.0 MB, Resolution:640x640 Length:00:00:21, tumblr_ryurvhRqFY1a1zhk7.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Anonymous
No.2733
>>2732
That's a nice image macro. Tells a nice educational story with user engagement.
Also visually striking and appealing composition.
10/10
That's a nice image macro. Tells a nice educational story with user engagement.
Also visually striking and appealing composition.
10/10
Anonymous
No.2734
Laugh
Anonymous
No.2769
>>2768
>more smarte
That's why he has an IQ of 82 and I'm suspecting his incoming is coming from affirmative action's privileges.
>more smarte
That's why he has an IQ of 82 and I'm suspecting his incoming is coming from affirmative action's privileges.
Footage of the annular eclipse in the western United States:
https://vxtwitter.com/nasa/status/1713232586590330923?s=46&t=XP7FxtdAj1hfcxhqXleA9g
https://vxtwitter.com/nasa/status/1713232586590330923?s=46&t=XP7FxtdAj1hfcxhqXleA9g
Anonymous
No.2791
Anonymous
No.2792
>>2790
It was partial where I am. It could be viewed through about 4 pairs of sunglasses, or a welding mask. You could see it pretty well, but cameras would always only show a circular sun.
It was partial where I am. It could be viewed through about 4 pairs of sunglasses, or a welding mask. You could see it pretty well, but cameras would always only show a circular sun.
Anonymous
No.2794
Anonymous
No.2795
Anonymous
No.2796
..in the years 1950-1951, the A. C. Gilbert Company distributed the Gilbert U-238 Atomic Energy Lab, a toy kit allowing kids to make nuclear reactions at home using actual radioactive material. It was taken off the shelves in 1951.
Anonymous
No.2806
>>2805
>they actually gave kids radioactive materials to play with
>taken off the shelf one year later
Top kek.
>they actually gave kids radioactive materials to play with
>taken off the shelf one year later
Top kek.
1699710293.mp4 (1.8 MB, Resolution:406x720 Length:00:00:58, Itgetsworsecommenteditedat_1b9fd727b84f288c5a983c6349daa677.mp4) [play once] [loop]
>>2837
>don't hire the next generation
Absolute boomer logic.
Also
>zoomers
Those kids are gen alpha. Zoomers are in their late teens and mid 20s.
>don't hire the next generation
Absolute boomer logic.
Also
>zoomers
Those kids are gen alpha. Zoomers are in their late teens and mid 20s.
>>2839
What does that even mean? Zoomers aren't the only people who own phones. Boomers have them too.
>That's right.
So just let society collapse. Great.
Boomers will say this shit and then have a cow when their social security gibs aren't being maintained.
What does that even mean? Zoomers aren't the only people who own phones. Boomers have them too.
>That's right.
So just let society collapse. Great.
Boomers will say this shit and then have a cow when their social security gibs aren't being maintained.
>>2840
1- I'm not a zoomer
2- I've zero gibs
3- I never owned a smartphone or TV
4- For my own experience, I positively know that zoomer are slimy trash.
1- I'm not a zoomer
2- I've zero gibs
3- I never owned a smartphone or TV
4- For my own experience, I positively know that zoomer are slimy trash.
>>2841
Zoomers are just people born after a certain time period. I don't think millennials or boomers are any better.
>I'm not a zoomer
What are you then?
>For my own experience
Anecdote. Cool.
Zoomers are just people born after a certain time period. I don't think millennials or boomers are any better.
>I'm not a zoomer
What are you then?
>For my own experience
Anecdote. Cool.
>>2845
>I've got burnt by those entitled
I could say the same about boomers, millennials and gen x.
That aside, the kids in the video are too young to be zoomers. Zoomers are in their 20s.
It's gen alpha that doesn't know how computers work, because nobody taught them.
>I've got burnt by those entitled
I could say the same about boomers, millennials and gen x.
That aside, the kids in the video are too young to be zoomers. Zoomers are in their 20s.
It's gen alpha that doesn't know how computers work, because nobody taught them.
>>2846
>I could say the same about boomers, millennials and gen x.
Yeah, but the zoomer unique characteristic is that they are good for nothing and a drag, almost like a woman.
>I could say the same about boomers, millennials and gen x.
Yeah, but the zoomer unique characteristic is that they are good for nothing and a drag, almost like a woman.
>>2848
They have no initiative or independent thought to face challenges, meaning they have zero value as troubleshotters. They behave like actual niggers looking the time for ending their shift and have no interest into get involved in their job. I'll hire a foreigner every time, sorry.
They have no initiative or independent thought to face challenges, meaning they have zero value as troubleshotters. They behave like actual niggers looking the time for ending their shift and have no interest into get involved in their job. I'll hire a foreigner every time, sorry.
>>2850
>They have no initiative or independent thought to face challenges
The oldest zoomers just got out of college. They're starting small businesses and entrepreneurship at a rate not seen in decades.
>They have no initiative or independent thought to face challenges
The oldest zoomers just got out of college. They're starting small businesses and entrepreneurship at a rate not seen in decades.
>>2851
>They're starting small businesses and entrepreneurship at a rate not seen in decades.
Sure, with a capital not of their own. See? Zoomers have it too cushy too begin with, that said, their prospects too make their business work is bleak, the market is not as it was. This is a service economy and not a one for producing goods any longer. So, yes, in this market zoomers are heading for utter economic failure.
>>2852
>You realize that most foreign workers are also zoomers, right?
Not at all, and the difference in attitude towards a job is like day and night.
>They're starting small businesses and entrepreneurship at a rate not seen in decades.
Sure, with a capital not of their own. See? Zoomers have it too cushy too begin with, that said, their prospects too make their business work is bleak, the market is not as it was. This is a service economy and not a one for producing goods any longer. So, yes, in this market zoomers are heading for utter economic failure.
>>2852
>You realize that most foreign workers are also zoomers, right?
Not at all, and the difference in attitude towards a job is like day and night.
Anonymous
No.2854
>>2853
>with a capital not of their own
That's not even close to true. Venture capital has all but dried up for this generation. Boomers screwed the economy and millennials spent the rest on avocado toast.
>the market is not as it was
And who caused that?
Zoomers have only been working full time for a couple years at most. They didn't make the economy what it is.
>This is a service economy
You can thank millennials and gen x for that, after the boomers screwed them.
>the difference in attitude towards a job
Zoomer isn't an attitude: it's an age. Everyone born within a certain time period is a zoomer.
>with a capital not of their own
That's not even close to true. Venture capital has all but dried up for this generation. Boomers screwed the economy and millennials spent the rest on avocado toast.
>the market is not as it was
And who caused that?
Zoomers have only been working full time for a couple years at most. They didn't make the economy what it is.
>This is a service economy
You can thank millennials and gen x for that, after the boomers screwed them.
>the difference in attitude towards a job
Zoomer isn't an attitude: it's an age. Everyone born within a certain time period is a zoomer.
>>2855
>Zoomer isn't an attitude: it's an age.
Sure, but modern kids are not the same than before. The stench of weed and the associated moral relaxation comes to my mind. Avoid.
>Zoomer isn't an attitude: it's an age.
Sure, but modern kids are not the same than before. The stench of weed and the associated moral relaxation comes to my mind. Avoid.
>>2857
>The stench of weed
Oh don't give me that. Boomers were the hippie generation and made weed popular; same goes for every gen until the turn of the millennium. Gen Z has the least weed of any generation, because they've lived their entire lives while weed was legal.
>moral relaxation
Moral relaxation that boomers caused with their sexual revolution and destruction of the family unit, followed by waves of multiculturalism.
Gen X is the first Gen to actually have a shift to the right. They're also far less likely to have casual sex compared to the last three generations.
>The stench of weed
Oh don't give me that. Boomers were the hippie generation and made weed popular; same goes for every gen until the turn of the millennium. Gen Z has the least weed of any generation, because they've lived their entire lives while weed was legal.
>moral relaxation
Moral relaxation that boomers caused with their sexual revolution and destruction of the family unit, followed by waves of multiculturalism.
Gen X is the first Gen to actually have a shift to the right. They're also far less likely to have casual sex compared to the last three generations.
Talking about zoomer character.
>>2861
How is it that zoomers would have lower testosterone than their parents if they're born from the same blood?
It's boomers who consume all of the T-boosting meds, because they can't come to terms with the fact that they're getting old.
How is it that zoomers would have lower testosterone than their parents if they're born from the same blood?
It's boomers who consume all of the T-boosting meds, because they can't come to terms with the fact that they're getting old.
>>2863
>It's boomers who consume all of the T-boosting meds
I wouldn't step on the pharmaceutical field for an answer, but the indoctrinational one instead. Zoomers have been under communist brainwashing for many years and the intensity is increasing. There is a correlation with the manifested judaism in a given society and the rate of moral disintegration.
>It's boomers who consume all of the T-boosting meds
I wouldn't step on the pharmaceutical field for an answer, but the indoctrinational one instead. Zoomers have been under communist brainwashing for many years and the intensity is increasing. There is a correlation with the manifested judaism in a given society and the rate of moral disintegration.
Anonymous
No.2867
>>2866
That has nothing to do with hormone levels.
>Zoomers have been under communist brainwashing for many years
That the last three generations enabled and perpetuated.
Zoomers are the generation that is forced to deal with the final consequences of the world that boomers created.
>There is a correlation with the manifested judaism
I will once again cite how boomers worship Israel.
>moral disintegration
Caused by hippie boomers with their sexual revolution and enabling faggots to spread.
Gen Z is only starting: they're all 15-25, and they hardly have anything to work with due to the state of the economy and social fabric of the world.
That has nothing to do with hormone levels.
>Zoomers have been under communist brainwashing for many years
That the last three generations enabled and perpetuated.
Zoomers are the generation that is forced to deal with the final consequences of the world that boomers created.
>There is a correlation with the manifested judaism
I will once again cite how boomers worship Israel.
>moral disintegration
Caused by hippie boomers with their sexual revolution and enabling faggots to spread.
Gen Z is only starting: they're all 15-25, and they hardly have anything to work with due to the state of the economy and social fabric of the world.
1699838032.mp4 (17.5 MB, Resolution:576x1024 Length:00:02:54, Snaptik.app_7240914447383088430.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Anonymous
No.2869
>>2868
>unreal levels of entitled boomer
Well, I admit I saw that kind before. Luckily I could leave before I punched that faggot in the face.
>unreal levels of entitled boomer
Well, I admit I saw that kind before. Luckily I could leave before I punched that faggot in the face.
Anonymous
No.2870
1699839311.jpg (149.8 KB, 1024x1024, facebook_1699836098670_7129629347999216020.jpg)
1699840008.mp4 (5.9 MB, Resolution:406x720 Length:00:00:52, 54532790f4632812.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Lead paint.
Interesting….could this be correct?
Interesting….could this be correct?
>>2871
Unlikely. A thin coating of lead paint isn't going to block anything. It's not solid lead, just particles of it. The lead shields they use for X rays and radiation therapy are solid pieces of lead, not paint. The "certain frequencies can't penetrate" thing seems like total BS too, since he doesn't cite whatever frequencies are blocked by paint.
EM waves would also still penetrate through the windows and other parts of houses. You would need a thick dome of lead to completely protect your house from EM waves.
Lead is actually very, very poisonous, and you don't want even a little bit of it inside of you because it causes severe brain damage. It was marketed heavily to be put into things unnecessarily because it was a byproduct in the production of silver, and the silver refiners needed to find a way to get rid of and profit from it. It nearly rendered an entire generation of people retarded.
It's just stupid clickbait tier bullshit.
Unlikely. A thin coating of lead paint isn't going to block anything. It's not solid lead, just particles of it. The lead shields they use for X rays and radiation therapy are solid pieces of lead, not paint. The "certain frequencies can't penetrate" thing seems like total BS too, since he doesn't cite whatever frequencies are blocked by paint.
EM waves would also still penetrate through the windows and other parts of houses. You would need a thick dome of lead to completely protect your house from EM waves.
Lead is actually very, very poisonous, and you don't want even a little bit of it inside of you because it causes severe brain damage. It was marketed heavily to be put into things unnecessarily because it was a byproduct in the production of silver, and the silver refiners needed to find a way to get rid of and profit from it. It nearly rendered an entire generation of people retarded.
It's just stupid clickbait tier bullshit.
>>2874
>A thin coating of lead paint isn't going to block anything. It's not solid lead, just particles of it.
I heard that microwave antennas can be blocked with silver paint which contain aluminum particles. At least the low power ones
>A thin coating of lead paint isn't going to block anything. It's not solid lead, just particles of it.
I heard that microwave antennas can be blocked with silver paint which contain aluminum particles. At least the low power ones
>>2875
That's not the kind of paint that was used in houses.
Also, that's just microwaves.
What frequencies are actually blocked by houses with lead paint?
That's not the kind of paint that was used in houses.
Also, that's just microwaves.
What frequencies are actually blocked by houses with lead paint?
>>2876
>That's not the kind of paint that was used in houses.
Correct. But the principle is the same. Metallic particles blocking or at least degrading the signal. I guess that an experiment might be done surrounding a router with a cardboard painted with silver paint.
>That's not the kind of paint that was used in houses.
Correct. But the principle is the same. Metallic particles blocking or at least degrading the signal. I guess that an experiment might be done surrounding a router with a cardboard painted with silver paint.
>>2877
>But the principle is the same
It's not really. Just because one kind of wave is blocked by another paint in a different context does not mean that lead paint blocks anything in any notable capacity. Silver is not lead, and the amount of metal in it isn't the same.
Lead paint was removed because rendering the taxpaying population retarded was hurting productivity, and to this day a lot of old lead paint and pipes still remain, and kids raised in those conditions are still being gimped because its not convenient for the government to do anything to stop it.
>surrounding a router with a cardboard painted with silver paint.
Messing with a routers would be the same as shielding an entire house. You would need to get the type of device that the elites supposedly want penetrating the building, build two identical houses (one with lead paint, one without), and tap both of the houses with the device and see if the lead paint has any meaningful impact.
>But the principle is the same
It's not really. Just because one kind of wave is blocked by another paint in a different context does not mean that lead paint blocks anything in any notable capacity. Silver is not lead, and the amount of metal in it isn't the same.
Lead paint was removed because rendering the taxpaying population retarded was hurting productivity, and to this day a lot of old lead paint and pipes still remain, and kids raised in those conditions are still being gimped because its not convenient for the government to do anything to stop it.
>surrounding a router with a cardboard painted with silver paint.
Messing with a routers would be the same as shielding an entire house. You would need to get the type of device that the elites supposedly want penetrating the building, build two identical houses (one with lead paint, one without), and tap both of the houses with the device and see if the lead paint has any meaningful impact.
>>2871
You know they sell metal tape. As in strips of metal with sticky stuff you can by and cover a very sizable room making a faraday cage relatively cheaply.
Did you know you can just buy powdered metals.
Or now metal artwork that is metal and wouldn't draw any attention?
You can buy loads of lead is various forms. It's soft and pliable, easy to fix components attaching wires ect. Going into the air.
Like most things it also degrades.
Microwave ovens arn't made of lead.
So while the point of removing lead from paint is the safety hazard because of deteriorating mental stability.
And it's after the wave of lead boosted gas, which I might add did increase efficiency by a large margin, that scared a nation of being poisoned by wide spread 'accepted' things.
Asbestos, radiation ect ect.
Just get tons of scrap metal. Or live in a cargo crate, those are options too.
There's rebar and metal walk ways are surprisingly affordable. It could cost as much as needed for peace of mind.
You know they sell metal tape. As in strips of metal with sticky stuff you can by and cover a very sizable room making a faraday cage relatively cheaply.
Did you know you can just buy powdered metals.
Or now metal artwork that is metal and wouldn't draw any attention?
You can buy loads of lead is various forms. It's soft and pliable, easy to fix components attaching wires ect. Going into the air.
Like most things it also degrades.
Microwave ovens arn't made of lead.
So while the point of removing lead from paint is the safety hazard because of deteriorating mental stability.
And it's after the wave of lead boosted gas, which I might add did increase efficiency by a large margin, that scared a nation of being poisoned by wide spread 'accepted' things.
Asbestos, radiation ect ect.
Just get tons of scrap metal. Or live in a cargo crate, those are options too.
There's rebar and metal walk ways are surprisingly affordable. It could cost as much as needed for peace of mind.
>>2883
No, I've just heard of this stuff before, and I know it's not made of lead.
The lead paint that was taken out of circulation isn't sufficient as shielding paint.
No, I've just heard of this stuff before, and I know it's not made of lead.
The lead paint that was taken out of circulation isn't sufficient as shielding paint.
>>2884
>The lead paint that was taken out of circulation isn't sufficient as shielding paint.
I'm sure of that, but it degrades the signal for sure.
>The lead paint that was taken out of circulation isn't sufficient as shielding paint.
I'm sure of that, but it degrades the signal for sure.
Anonymous
No.2886
>>2880
Faraday Cages require specific materials and angle-of-approach calculations in order to determine which wavelengths can be protected against. For a single room to be entirely shielded you would need an external layer of high carbon (stainless) steel, then extruded aluminum, 99% copper, >95% lead, and an internal layer of low carbon steel sheeting, all of at least 1/20" thickness that completely encloses the walls and ceiling with no gaps.
Would be much more efficient to create a small, selective 'safe' of sorts to shield specific devices.. unless you need a neutron-protected bunker.
Faraday Cages require specific materials and angle-of-approach calculations in order to determine which wavelengths can be protected against. For a single room to be entirely shielded you would need an external layer of high carbon (stainless) steel, then extruded aluminum, 99% copper, >95% lead, and an internal layer of low carbon steel sheeting, all of at least 1/20" thickness that completely encloses the walls and ceiling with no gaps.
Would be much more efficient to create a small, selective 'safe' of sorts to shield specific devices.. unless you need a neutron-protected bunker.
>>2885
>but it degrades the signal for sure
... No?
Where did you hear that it degrades the signal? By what margin does it do that?
>but it degrades the signal for sure
... No?
Where did you hear that it degrades the signal? By what margin does it do that?
>>2885
Lead paint only contains a tiny amount of lead for color, and doesn't provide any kind of shielding or degrade the signal.
Heck, the wood/brick wall would degrade the signal more than the traces of lead in the paint.
>>2888
That's not lead paint. That's specially made shielding paint with large amounts of shielding materials in it.
Lead paint only contains a tiny amount of lead for color, and doesn't provide any kind of shielding or degrade the signal.
Heck, the wood/brick wall would degrade the signal more than the traces of lead in the paint.
>>2888
That's not lead paint. That's specially made shielding paint with large amounts of shielding materials in it.
>>2889
>That's specially made shielding paint with large amounts of shielding materials in it
Aha! And the shielding materials are...?
>That's specially made shielding paint with large amounts of shielding materials in it
Aha! And the shielding materials are...?
>>2891
Not lead, as per the article.
You need to have a high density of material for shielding materials to do anything at all. Tiny traces of lead do nothing.
Not lead, as per the article.
You need to have a high density of material for shielding materials to do anything at all. Tiny traces of lead do nothing.
1699843284.png (182.2 KB, 1280x1676, df5j90z-637408f3-09e9-4aa8-a62f-2cda7358181a.png)
>>2895
Lmao. Now you're just projecting.
You've been saying that poisonous lead was taken off the market just because it could potentially distort certain EMF waves (it can't,; it doesn't have enough lead), when all the non-toxic shielding paints are still on the market.
Lmao. Now you're just projecting.
You've been saying that poisonous lead was taken off the market just because it could potentially distort certain EMF waves (it can't,; it doesn't have enough lead), when all the non-toxic shielding paints are still on the market.
>>2896
>You've been saying that poisonous lead was taken off the market just because it could potentially distort certain EMF waves
1- Lead being poisonous is still for debate
2- There is a reason antenna's protections are made with fiber glass and not painted polymers.
>You've been saying that poisonous lead was taken off the market just because it could potentially distort certain EMF waves
1- Lead being poisonous is still for debate
2- There is a reason antenna's protections are made with fiber glass and not painted polymers.
>>2897
>Most EMF paints are made with graphene/graphite as their blocking material
It might, but I doubt that is the main active component because is way too expensive.
>Most EMF paints are made with graphene/graphite as their blocking material
It might, but I doubt that is the main active component because is way too expensive.
>>2898
>1- Lead being poisonous is still for debate
How? Who is it that contests that lead is poisonous?
Is that what you're saying?
>2- There is a reason antenna's protections are made with fiber glass and not painted polymers.
What's that have to do with lear paint?
>1- Lead being poisonous is still for debate
How? Who is it that contests that lead is poisonous?
Is that what you're saying?
>2- There is a reason antenna's protections are made with fiber glass and not painted polymers.
What's that have to do with lear paint?
>>2900
>What's that have to do with lear paint?
Not exclusively with lead paint, but with many paints containing metals.
>What's that have to do with lear paint?
Not exclusively with lead paint, but with many paints containing metals.
>>2899
EMF paint is expensive.
And yes, it is the main blocking ingredient. Look at the article posted above.
EMF paint is expensive.
And yes, it is the main blocking ingredient. Look at the article posted above.
>>2902
Dude, as a analogy you can understand. A pharmaceutical pill weights perhaps 0,1 gram, but the active drugs is not more than 0,001 gram.
Dude, as a analogy you can understand. A pharmaceutical pill weights perhaps 0,1 gram, but the active drugs is not more than 0,001 gram.
>>2901
Other non-toxic metals haven't been removed from paint, so that's a moot point.
And lead paint doesn't have enough lead paint to block signals.
Want to test it? Acquire some 1970s lead paint (not hard if you know where to look) and cover a router with a cardboard box painted with it: see absolutely no difference.
Other non-toxic metals haven't been removed from paint, so that's a moot point.
And lead paint doesn't have enough lead paint to block signals.
Want to test it? Acquire some 1970s lead paint (not hard if you know where to look) and cover a router with a cardboard box painted with it: see absolutely no difference.
>>2906
I guess that's that then.
Idk if I can convince you that lead will fuck you up, but it really is toxic, and I pray for your children if you raise them in a house with it. Don't fall for stupid ticktock memes telling you to paint your house with it. If you want to block EMF waves, get EMF paint.
I guess that's that then.
Idk if I can convince you that lead will fuck you up, but it really is toxic, and I pray for your children if you raise them in a house with it. Don't fall for stupid ticktock memes telling you to paint your house with it. If you want to block EMF waves, get EMF paint.
>>2907
>lead will fuck you up, but it really is toxic
I understand you point of view. The jewish TV told you so.
>lead will fuck you up, but it really is toxic
I understand you point of view. The jewish TV told you so.
Anonymous
No.2912
Anonymous
No.2914
>>2911
I don't even use lead solder (even though it works well) because my shitty job isn't worth compromising my health for a slight increase in efficiency.
I don't even use lead solder (even though it works well) because my shitty job isn't worth compromising my health for a slight increase in efficiency.
>>2911
That's why you need to research anon. Ingestion is not the same than breathing. An analogy if you don't mind; serpent's venon is lethal if injected, but harmless if swallowed.
That's why you need to research anon. Ingestion is not the same than breathing. An analogy if you don't mind; serpent's venon is lethal if injected, but harmless if swallowed.
>>2915
Lead is poisonous no matter how you get it in your body.
There was a recent study analyzing the baby teeth of children in areas with lead pipes and it was found that lead was building up in their bodies and causing brain damage.
Lead is poisonous no matter how you get it in your body.
There was a recent study analyzing the baby teeth of children in areas with lead pipes and it was found that lead was building up in their bodies and causing brain damage.
>>2920
I do.
Give me a name of the report and I'll read it right now, if you're really so certain of the validity of your "research".
I do.
Give me a name of the report and I'll read it right now, if you're really so certain of the validity of your "research".
>>2922
What counts as "zog sources" then? Any source that says lead is toxic?
The only research I'm finding refuting the toxicity of lead are 1970'e propaganda funded by the silver refinery that was interested in selling lead.
What counts as "zog sources" then? Any source that says lead is toxic?
The only research I'm finding refuting the toxicity of lead are 1970'e propaganda funded by the silver refinery that was interested in selling lead.
>>2922
Tell me what counts as "ZOG" to you and I'll strike it from the search. There's a lot of research about lead toxicity from a lot of different sources.
Tell me what counts as "ZOG" to you and I'll strike it from the search. There's a lot of research about lead toxicity from a lot of different sources.
>>2925
>There's a lot of research about lead toxicity from a lot of different sources.
Of course, it is expected.
>There's a lot of research about lead toxicity from a lot of different sources.
Of course, it is expected.
Anonymous
No.2927
>>2928
Because you are not a real anon, you are a fraud.
Any anon with proper autism would stop replaying and turn the internet upside down to find the truth.
Because you are not a real anon, you are a fraud.
Any anon with proper autism would stop replaying and turn the internet upside down to find the truth.
Anonymous
No.2936
>>2930
Shut up, nigger. I've been using 4chan since 2009, and /mlpol/ since day 1. You say this every time you lose an argument, and nobody is buying it. Every other week you say it to oldfags on this site, you pretentious poser.
I'm turning the Internet upside down right now, but I'm asking you because I know it would be a waste of time because you'd cry "zog" at whenever source I give you that contradicts your worldview.
So, what counts as a legitimate source for you?
Shut up, nigger. I've been using 4chan since 2009, and /mlpol/ since day 1. You say this every time you lose an argument, and nobody is buying it. Every other week you say it to oldfags on this site, you pretentious poser.
I'm turning the Internet upside down right now, but I'm asking you because I know it would be a waste of time because you'd cry "zog" at whenever source I give you that contradicts your worldview.
So, what counts as a legitimate source for you?
>>2937
>DB?
I rest my case. You parachuted here and have a hard time to blend. (((They))) are not sending their best.
>DB?
I rest my case. You parachuted here and have a hard time to blend. (((They))) are not sending their best.
>>2938
Yeah right, nigger. You've only been here for like 3 years, and have been shitting up the place ever since. This site was comfy before you moved in with your negroid antics and spam memes. Notice how people hardly ever reply positively to your posts? Nobody's thankful for your TikTok/faceberg tier sewage you spew all over this board on a weekly basis.
You can call me a kike or shill or a normie or whatever the fuck you want, but nobody believes you. Everyone on this board sees through your bullshit. You do it all the time and it has no effect other than annoying people until they lose interest, and everyone knows it by now. Once in a while people try to engage your arguments and it's like playing chess with a rooster: you shit all over the board and then strut about like you won, when really it's just that people get bored of interacting with you. It's why nobody bothers to reply to your lonely meme-dump/news threads. You call people names when they disagree with your position, but that shit doesn't work here.
Yeah right, nigger. You've only been here for like 3 years, and have been shitting up the place ever since. This site was comfy before you moved in with your negroid antics and spam memes. Notice how people hardly ever reply positively to your posts? Nobody's thankful for your TikTok/faceberg tier sewage you spew all over this board on a weekly basis.
You can call me a kike or shill or a normie or whatever the fuck you want, but nobody believes you. Everyone on this board sees through your bullshit. You do it all the time and it has no effect other than annoying people until they lose interest, and everyone knows it by now. Once in a while people try to engage your arguments and it's like playing chess with a rooster: you shit all over the board and then strut about like you won, when really it's just that people get bored of interacting with you. It's why nobody bothers to reply to your lonely meme-dump/news threads. You call people names when they disagree with your position, but that shit doesn't work here.
>>2939
You are assuming you know me, are you a jannie perhaps? If so, would you mind to stick to the subject (lead toxicity) and research it instead of resorting to unrelated butthurt?
You are assuming you know me, are you a jannie perhaps? If so, would you mind to stick to the subject (lead toxicity) and research it instead of resorting to unrelated butthurt?
Anonymous
No.2941
>>2939
>Once in a while people try to engage your arguments and it's like playing chess with a rooster
You may not like it, but /mlpol/ needs moar of this.
>Once in a while people try to engage your arguments and it's like playing chess with a rooster
You may not like it, but /mlpol/ needs moar of this.
>>2942
>numbers go brrrrrrr
>don't mind the quality; your subreddit needs more updoots!
Fuck off with your self-awarding, you pretentious hack. Nobody likes spam or low-quality non-arguments. It's just a timesink for the board's mental energy that contributes nothing, while drowning out quality content and driving away content creators. I don't even recommend this board to other pony communities anymore because I'm embarrassed that the first thing they'll see is your hogwash.
>numbers go brrrrrrr
>don't mind the quality; your subreddit needs more updoots!
Fuck off with your self-awarding, you pretentious hack. Nobody likes spam or low-quality non-arguments. It's just a timesink for the board's mental energy that contributes nothing, while drowning out quality content and driving away content creators. I don't even recommend this board to other pony communities anymore because I'm embarrassed that the first thing they'll see is your hogwash.
Anonymous
No.2945
>>2944
>he unironically thinks just because the post number goes up he's doing good
Now this is narcism.
>he unironically thinks just because the post number goes up he's doing good
Now this is narcism.
>>2943
>I don't even recommend this board to other pony communities anymore because I'm embarrassed that the first thing they'll see is your hogwash.
Post moar yourself. Suppressing shitposting is what /leftypol/ wants.
>I don't even recommend this board to other pony communities anymore because I'm embarrassed that the first thing they'll see is your hogwash.
Post moar yourself. Suppressing shitposting is what /leftypol/ wants.
>>2946
Nobody is suppressing shitposting.
Also
>implying /leftypol/ isn't full of spam and shitposts and low-quality arguments
Have you ever even seen bunkerchan? You'd feel right at home there.
Nobody is suppressing shitposting.
Also
>implying /leftypol/ isn't full of spam and shitposts and low-quality arguments
Have you ever even seen bunkerchan? You'd feel right at home there.
>>2947
>bunkerchan
Commies want this board to go extinct and some anons here are doing the marxist work.
They post little, if any, and complain when others do. In my view that's called sabotage.
>bunkerchan
Commies want this board to go extinct and some anons here are doing the marxist work.
They post little, if any, and complain when others do. In my view that's called sabotage.
1699848267.jpg (64.0 KB, 1039x538, 048E51A83244A9EE66E7CC8432D23E3D-65517.jpg)
>>2940
Dude... if you're not a new cancer fag you'd know posting styles by now.
And even I know about how anons post and with a reasonable degree of accuracy.
When others bring in sources you say it's bullshit or ignore it outright.
>>2942
Ew of you being a retarded fag for twenty five posts going hurr durr gonna eats me some lead.
I'll eat some fucking lead and end my pain. Least then I don't have to be sane in clown world.
Look I had a brief chuckle at the eating lead bit. Can you just stop.
Please, stop.
You're everything I thought I wanted until I got it. Post count, memes, news, images, ect.
But you have no engagement, there's no heart in it, there's no mental rigor, there's no joy in talking with people even those who disagree.
Just one long shit test.
Please fucking stop, I've had enough. I used to do what you do now. It's asinine.
It's time to stop.
>>2946
I don't want your future of the site to be a faceburg repository, a tiktok retardation factory, a news aggregate. I want the whole site back.
Back before any of the bullshit.
I don't want to live in a site of manufactured posts just because number goes up.
I don't want your vision for the site.
>>2948
If I had the energy I'd... how about you grow as a person a little more.
Dude... if you're not a new cancer fag you'd know posting styles by now.
And even I know about how anons post and with a reasonable degree of accuracy.
When others bring in sources you say it's bullshit or ignore it outright.
>>2942
Ew of you being a retarded fag for twenty five posts going hurr durr gonna eats me some lead.
I'll eat some fucking lead and end my pain. Least then I don't have to be sane in clown world.
Look I had a brief chuckle at the eating lead bit. Can you just stop.
Please, stop.
You're everything I thought I wanted until I got it. Post count, memes, news, images, ect.
But you have no engagement, there's no heart in it, there's no mental rigor, there's no joy in talking with people even those who disagree.
Just one long shit test.
Please fucking stop, I've had enough. I used to do what you do now. It's asinine.
It's time to stop.
>>2946
I don't want your future of the site to be a faceburg repository, a tiktok retardation factory, a news aggregate. I want the whole site back.
Back before any of the bullshit.
I don't want to live in a site of manufactured posts just because number goes up.
I don't want your vision for the site.
>>2948
If I had the energy I'd... how about you grow as a person a little more.
Anonymous
No.2951
>>2948
Sure, faggot. I've been here since day 1, since this silly April fool's joke of a board was created on that fateful day. I loved /mlpol/ because it was free of shills and spam and low-quality Facebook/reddit goyslop and retards from /ptg/ calling everyone a shill. I've been here ever since, and I'll gladly speak up against the encroachment of the same low-quality garbage that ruined /pol/.
>>2952
>I couldn't have said it better.
Post moar. Moaning won't do anything.
Post ponies at least or you are full of shit.
>I couldn't have said it better.
Post moar. Moaning won't do anything.
Post ponies at least or you are full of shit.
1699848625_1.jpg (91.7 KB, 1380x1040, 0263B7E1110085CA067D2098BE49068A-93854.jpg)
1699848625_2.png (1.8 MB, 1129x1441, 0820F2C36EF729289E59887F15D89B38-1851043.png)
>>2953
I'm physically mentally tapped the fuck out. The most I got is a bit of anger and literally God.
I want to. But I break the fuck down.
I'm physically mentally tapped the fuck out. The most I got is a bit of anger and literally God.
I want to. But I break the fuck down.
>>2955
>I want to. But I break the fuck down.
Move aside, as you already have done, and allow autism to take over.
>I want to. But I break the fuck down.
Move aside, as you already have done, and allow autism to take over.
>>2956
So fuck you, and get it through your thick head. We don't want any of this smug bullshit, but a fucking friend you asshole!
So fuck you, and get it through your thick head. We don't want any of this smug bullshit, but a fucking friend you asshole!
Anonymous
No.2960
Anonymous
No.2964
>>2963
>More like a blip to anybody else, but it ment something to me.
Of course, autistic fag don't give a fuck about blips.
>More like a blip to anybody else, but it ment something to me.
Of course, autistic fag don't give a fuck about blips.
1699849342.jpg (137.8 KB, 530x511, BD2FAD7C2BB2CBA1A25CBC2EF9C1A4EF-141063.jpg)
>>2962
You fix your faggot ass. You're 'tism would actually drive people here instead of away if you weren't such a massive cock sucking faggot.
I'm trying, but it's not fucking working.
You fix your faggot ass. You're 'tism would actually drive people here instead of away if you weren't such a massive cock sucking faggot.
I'm trying, but it's not fucking working.
Anonymous
No.2969
Anonymous
No.2971
>>2965
>You're 'tism would actually drive people here instead of away if you weren't such a massive cock sucking faggot
Yeah, tbh. Too bad he refuses to learn. It's a shame and a waste.
>You're 'tism would actually drive people here instead of away if you weren't such a massive cock sucking faggot
Yeah, tbh. Too bad he refuses to learn. It's a shame and a waste.
>>2970
>shitpost when nopony asks for it
Then why do you even post? Who are you doing it for? Why do you keep spamming if you don't care who sees it? It's shitting up the place and nopony wants it.
Why couldn't you just lurk and learn the ways of the board and modify your behavior in a way that would have been productive? Why did you do this shit, and for who?
>shitpost when nopony asks for it
Then why do you even post? Who are you doing it for? Why do you keep spamming if you don't care who sees it? It's shitting up the place and nopony wants it.
Why couldn't you just lurk and learn the ways of the board and modify your behavior in a way that would have been productive? Why did you do this shit, and for who?
>>2974
>Then why do you even post? Who are you doing it for?
For everypony. The fact of you kvetching is proof that my posting is triggering you. Good. And remember, most of my posting is in my containment threads as I have been expelled from most of the main board. So, chillax poner.
>Then why do you even post? Who are you doing it for?
For everypony. The fact of you kvetching is proof that my posting is triggering you. Good. And remember, most of my posting is in my containment threads as I have been expelled from most of the main board. So, chillax poner.
1699850140.png (341.6 KB, 1201x1825, FC3A72C3BAE8B125BC112F594CCD9621-349808.png)
>>2976
>For everypony
Everypony is unamused. Consider changing your behavior; you might find that anons actually like it.
A dozen or so anons complain, the rest just don't engage at all. The point of posting is for positive engagement.
>I have been expelled from most of the main
I wonder why.
>For everypony
Everypony is unamused. Consider changing your behavior; you might find that anons actually like it.
A dozen or so anons complain, the rest just don't engage at all. The point of posting is for positive engagement.
>I have been expelled from most of the main
I wonder why.
>>2978
>Everypony is unamused.
Some are. Memes are usually not deserving a commentary, but their payload is meaningful, the kvetching is not lying. KEK
>Everypony is unamused.
Some are. Memes are usually not deserving a commentary, but their payload is meaningful, the kvetching is not lying. KEK
1699850437.gif (2.8 MB, 604x340, 92A063B649EAA11B1FC74AE2BF70898E-2925571.gif)
>>2979
Doesn't mean you've grown.
Just, cut the time you would shit post here and be with God. Read His word for at least two thirds as you spend here.
Doesn't mean you've grown.
Just, cut the time you would shit post here and be with God. Read His word for at least two thirds as you spend here.
Anonymous
No.2982
>>2981
>Just, cut the time you would shit post here and be with God.
Well, I'll take your advice a bit. See ya later.
>Just, cut the time you would shit post here and be with God.
Well, I'll take your advice a bit. See ya later.
>>2980
Memes do elicit comment, especially when they are in the right place at the right time and the right fucking memes.
So please just stop for a while.
You've 'generated' 100 posts that boil down to
>hurr durr lead eat it
>Look at me making hundreds of posts
Memes do elicit comment, especially when they are in the right place at the right time and the right fucking memes.
So please just stop for a while.
You've 'generated' 100 posts that boil down to
>hurr durr lead eat it
>Look at me making hundreds of posts
Anonymous
No.2984
>>2983
>So please just stop for a while.
For a while, perhaps. I've postponed some things lately... I'll see.
>So please just stop for a while.
For a while, perhaps. I've postponed some things lately... I'll see.
Anonymous
No.2986
This probably isn't the right place t ask, but does anyone have good recommendation for tutorials/channels that explain how to use Blender, specifically 2d animations as well as rigging and scripting as I was wondering on how difficult of a process would it be to recreate the flash puppet style into it?
>>3001
anon, I mentioned this to AnonTheAnon and he said he just looks stuff up on youtube... lol...
After re-reading your question though, you might be happier with synfig
https://www.synfig.org/
I have not yet had a chance to actually use it, but I did do a very stupid simple thing a long time ago and got a sphere to move around very easily and change size.
If you want, make a thread about synfig and I'll learn it with you.
anon, I mentioned this to AnonTheAnon and he said he just looks stuff up on youtube... lol...
After re-reading your question though, you might be happier with synfig
https://www.synfig.org/
I have not yet had a chance to actually use it, but I did do a very stupid simple thing a long time ago and got a sphere to move around very easily and change size.
If you want, make a thread about synfig and I'll learn it with you.
>>3002
>Synfig Studio
ehh, after less then successful attempts at trying to learn animating in Krita and BoomToon I am kind of fed up with purely 2d based animating programs, also if the idea of doing the Blender recreation ends up successful there is a horde of useful addons and other crap that could bump up utility of it (just the fact that you can use python code for running simple scripts is an amazing advantage over anything else out there).
>Synfig Studio
ehh, after less then successful attempts at trying to learn animating in Krita and BoomToon I am kind of fed up with purely 2d based animating programs, also if the idea of doing the Blender recreation ends up successful there is a horde of useful addons and other crap that could bump up utility of it (just the fact that you can use python code for running simple scripts is an amazing advantage over anything else out there).
Anonymous
No.3004
Anonymous
No.3009
1700847486.jpg (101.2 KB, 1080x1103, 9fc8cb7069896e1ce9e30fa8625137f6cc28d77fb513eb9b6f7ec4067a2d2c29_1.jpg)
Anonymous
No.3012
Anonymous
No.3038
1701690575.mp4 (2.3 MB, Resolution:356x640 Length:00:00:18, Did not know this.mp4) [play once] [loop]
If you submit to the jewish usury, be careful.
>>3039
Good grief. Did you forget what planet you're on?
China can't into space. You're thinking of Poland.
https://m.youtube.com/@laowhy86/videos
Good grief. Did you forget what planet you're on?
China can't into space. You're thinking of Poland.
https://m.youtube.com/@laowhy86/videos
Anonymous
No.3042
>>3041
China can't into space because they were cut off from information regarding space, but they still got those samples, and now NASA is being petty about it.
China can't into space because they were cut off from information regarding space, but they still got those samples, and now NASA is being petty about it.
>>3043
You don't even know what bait is, nigger.
Nobody's baiting you. Fuck off to your containment thread.
You don't even know what bait is, nigger.
Nobody's baiting you. Fuck off to your containment thread.
1701748164.png (700.2 KB, 1400x1850, 0E45DF2B7F5B5D5C24A7FDD08AA21AE6-716971.png)
>>3046
>>3043
Is this what it feels like watching '017 hyper cancer?
Just an entirely preventable 'misunderstandings' and refusals to understand.
On a community wanting and willing to give the benefit of the doubt.
Just going along that the first voice is whatever one you've imagined it to be, shitting and twerking as if that's just fine.
When confronted it's
>"Oh that one voice said I need to go on the sidewalk to shit instead of the toilet, then one voice said not to shit on the sidewalk so I'm shitting on the toilet seat again, the one voice said something and I'm shitting as I walk, but only with one butt cheek hanging out."
>"There's lots of contradictory voices so I just ignore them and the ones that saythe same thing I ignore them too. I only listen to the voice I listen to."
>"What do you mean the one voice I listen to is different than who I think they are? You're wrong and dumb."
>"I'll just keep on doing what I do and I'll keep on shitting."
This is the point where I would usually keep on typing the green, but frankly he won't read it. You are so congrats on being able to function as a human being.
This is like one of those agreement sheets where scrolling down and accepting without reading happens except vaguely more entertaining.
I think I just want everybody to know, you're not alone and someone is rooting for you. Sorry about the lack of ponut and equnius vaginus. I'm rooting for you all. Unfortunately even the street shitter. Mostly in hopes of character growth.
>"What do you mean the rules say no mixing, so pee and poo don't go together."
>"Voices are dumb, me smort. Me shit more, more shit is better."
>"I'll go pout till voice be shut up so I go shit everywhere in peace. Me and voice have agreement that I shit."
>>3043
Is this what it feels like watching '017 hyper cancer?
Just an entirely preventable 'misunderstandings' and refusals to understand.
On a community wanting and willing to give the benefit of the doubt.
Just going along that the first voice is whatever one you've imagined it to be, shitting and twerking as if that's just fine.
When confronted it's
>"Oh that one voice said I need to go on the sidewalk to shit instead of the toilet, then one voice said not to shit on the sidewalk so I'm shitting on the toilet seat again, the one voice said something and I'm shitting as I walk, but only with one butt cheek hanging out."
>"There's lots of contradictory voices so I just ignore them and the ones that saythe same thing I ignore them too. I only listen to the voice I listen to."
>"What do you mean the one voice I listen to is different than who I think they are? You're wrong and dumb."
>"I'll just keep on doing what I do and I'll keep on shitting."
This is the point where I would usually keep on typing the green, but frankly he won't read it. You are so congrats on being able to function as a human being.
This is like one of those agreement sheets where scrolling down and accepting without reading happens except vaguely more entertaining.
I think I just want everybody to know, you're not alone and someone is rooting for you. Sorry about the lack of ponut and equnius vaginus. I'm rooting for you all. Unfortunately even the street shitter. Mostly in hopes of character growth.
>"What do you mean the rules say no mixing, so pee and poo don't go together."
>"Voices are dumb, me smort. Me shit more, more shit is better."
>"I'll go pout till voice be shut up so I go shit everywhere in peace. Me and voice have agreement that I shit."
Anonymous
No.3048
1701748692.png (9.5 MB, 3072x4096, fluttershy-walking-in-park-1-1.png)
Anonymous
No.3049
Anonymous
No.3052
Anonymous
No.3053
>>3050
I think it was one of the aspies from the flat earth thread. The implication being that space doesn’t exist so posting about it would be bait. That’s my best guess anyway.
I think it was one of the aspies from the flat earth thread. The implication being that space doesn’t exist so posting about it would be bait. That’s my best guess anyway.
1702857713.jpg (192.5 KB, 1200x1563, Fake black inventors - The tricycle.jpg)
Anonymous
No.3064
Anonymous
No.3065
1703301077_1.jpg (137.3 KB, 1080x1069, the-industrial-r-ule-evolution-and-its-consequences-v0-s4hf57maplnb1.jpg)
Anonymous
No.3068
>>3067
>the entire board revolves around me and my shitty world view!
Nobody is baiting you. Nobody asked for your opinion. Go back to your containment thread.
>the entire board revolves around me and my shitty world view!
Nobody is baiting you. Nobody asked for your opinion. Go back to your containment thread.
Anonymous
No.3069
1703386688.jpg (72.5 KB, 1080x1075, Screenshot_20231223_124306_Instagram.jpg)
1704148937.jpg (22.4 KB, 700x632, My-son-will-use-a-dot-matrix-1704127293006.jpg)
>>3078
What's so weird about what he did?
Old people need help figuring out how computers work, and teaching marketable skills to your children is normal, especially since kids have to use printers for school and stuff.
As he said, his whole generation (probably gen X) had to do this.
Even I've explained how printers work to older people (coworkers/family), and although I don't have any children of my own I've helped them with technical problems when volunteering/chaperoning/babysitting children.
It's not "fair", but life isn't fair. I do my best to help my family and friends with my skills.
What's so weird about what he did?
Old people need help figuring out how computers work, and teaching marketable skills to your children is normal, especially since kids have to use printers for school and stuff.
As he said, his whole generation (probably gen X) had to do this.
Even I've explained how printers work to older people (coworkers/family), and although I don't have any children of my own I've helped them with technical problems when volunteering/chaperoning/babysitting children.
It's not "fair", but life isn't fair. I do my best to help my family and friends with my skills.
>>3080
>What's so weird about what he did?
>weird
I bet that's the norm today. /s
The sons and daughters own that to their parents and way more, to putting plainly. It is their duty.
>What's so weird about what he did?
>weird
I bet that's the norm today. /s
The sons and daughters own that to their parents and way more, to putting plainly. It is their duty.
>>3080
>refusing to take care of your own
It comes to my mind the cases of China and even Mexico, homelessness is practically non-existent there, because the concept of Family is above everything else. There is something really fucked up in the Anglo mind.
>refusing to take care of your own
It comes to my mind the cases of China and even Mexico, homelessness is practically non-existent there, because the concept of Family is above everything else. There is something really fucked up in the Anglo mind.
>>3083
>There is something really fucked up
Better put on your thinking cap.
Mexico and China are really fucked, despite the 'family directive'.
Jesus is going to calmly open the door when people knock, he's reaching out continuously.
You could say ah ha it's the jews and the demons the spiritual forces behind them. It's almost adequate enough, except there's no solution ever. Unless there's Jesus who died as the perfect being taking on everything the law will extract from you. There are creatures that will do everything they can to make you suffer.
Why is the western sphere seemingly out of sorts?
They don't let Jesus in when He knocks, and they don't knock seeking Jesus. Those who think Jesus is just psychological conditioning, a flavor of the chosen one, a delusion, just something some people wrote about a long time ago, a means to scam people.
They haven't met the man who is God who formed you who loves you who knows your suffering better than anyone else even yourself and will help you.
The past iterations of 'church goers' seemed to miss the memo about all the crap going on. A disconnect of reality and the evil forces. Instead placing burdens upon others not lifting those burdens off. God with heartfelt cooperation with people saves people.
>>3077
>I'm saddled with the consequences of older generations fucking up, and new generations having their minds and hearts be extinguished, and my generation still being fucked up.
It's fucking sad.
It's been that way for a long time.
His freedom and His kingdom is here though.
He's going to make a new thing, it's not any systems or structures made before by people alone.
Are you ready for applied Christ-horsfucker-cap-theo-soc-nat-meme-constitution-freedom-internet-fillerwordhere-autism?
I wouldn't be, like what the fuck. That's crazy talk from a crazy Anon.
What does it even mean? How is it? Where is it? Why is it? Who is it?
I don't know.
Like stabbing in the dark, but then realizing you're not holding a knife but a horsinator that's used to find horse hair underwater and it's painted pink for some reason but you couldn't tell becuase of how dark it is, then ponker po shows up to reverse mug you sharing the good news.
>There is something really fucked up
Better put on your thinking cap.
Mexico and China are really fucked, despite the 'family directive'.
Jesus is going to calmly open the door when people knock, he's reaching out continuously.
You could say ah ha it's the jews and the demons the spiritual forces behind them. It's almost adequate enough, except there's no solution ever. Unless there's Jesus who died as the perfect being taking on everything the law will extract from you. There are creatures that will do everything they can to make you suffer.
Why is the western sphere seemingly out of sorts?
They don't let Jesus in when He knocks, and they don't knock seeking Jesus. Those who think Jesus is just psychological conditioning, a flavor of the chosen one, a delusion, just something some people wrote about a long time ago, a means to scam people.
They haven't met the man who is God who formed you who loves you who knows your suffering better than anyone else even yourself and will help you.
The past iterations of 'church goers' seemed to miss the memo about all the crap going on. A disconnect of reality and the evil forces. Instead placing burdens upon others not lifting those burdens off. God with heartfelt cooperation with people saves people.
>>3077
>I'm saddled with the consequences of older generations fucking up, and new generations having their minds and hearts be extinguished, and my generation still being fucked up.
It's fucking sad.
It's been that way for a long time.
His freedom and His kingdom is here though.
He's going to make a new thing, it's not any systems or structures made before by people alone.
Are you ready for applied Christ-horsfucker-cap-theo-soc-nat-meme-constitution-freedom-internet-fillerwordhere-autism?
I wouldn't be, like what the fuck. That's crazy talk from a crazy Anon.
What does it even mean? How is it? Where is it? Why is it? Who is it?
I don't know.
Like stabbing in the dark, but then realizing you're not holding a knife but a horsinator that's used to find horse hair underwater and it's painted pink for some reason but you couldn't tell becuase of how dark it is, then ponker po shows up to reverse mug you sharing the good news.
>>3083
>refusing
How is teaching a child/parent to use a printer refusing to care for them? Teaching is caring.
>refusing
How is teaching a child/parent to use a printer refusing to care for them? Teaching is caring.
Anonymous
No.3086
>>3081
What are you even talking about? Did you read the post?
>>3083
I literally just said I showed my friends and relatives how to use printers. I to this day have never refused to do this for someone, be they my own or a stranger.
I just sympathize with the Twitter screencap because doing so is a chore: one more thing to deal with in this increasingly technological society.
What are you even talking about? Did you read the post?
>>3083
I literally just said I showed my friends and relatives how to use printers. I to this day have never refused to do this for someone, be they my own or a stranger.
I just sympathize with the Twitter screencap because doing so is a chore: one more thing to deal with in this increasingly technological society.
Anonymous
No.3087
>>3085
Oops, I get it now. That dude, by his age, belongs to the generation when printers were all around. My mistake.
Oops, I get it now. That dude, by his age, belongs to the generation when printers were all around. My mistake.
Anonymous
No.3088
>>3092
Ryan is a Gaelic Irish name.
>Ryan is a classic Irish last name that has become a popular first name for both boys and girls. Ryan comes from the Gaelic words righ and an, which together mean "little king." It's also derived from the Irish surname O'Riain.
That's not Anglo.
Florence is an Italian name. If we want to speculate about this random internet stranger's family history we could guess that he's from an Italian American family with a bit of of Irish in him, as Catholics were more likely to marry other Catholics in the Americas.
He doesn't even look Anglo. Bone structure and facial hair is totally different.
Ryan is a Gaelic Irish name.
>Ryan is a classic Irish last name that has become a popular first name for both boys and girls. Ryan comes from the Gaelic words righ and an, which together mean "little king." It's also derived from the Irish surname O'Riain.
That's not Anglo.
Florence is an Italian name. If we want to speculate about this random internet stranger's family history we could guess that he's from an Italian American family with a bit of of Irish in him, as Catholics were more likely to marry other Catholics in the Americas.
He doesn't even look Anglo. Bone structure and facial hair is totally different.
>>3094
You really don't know anything about white ethnicities and can't admit that you're just wrong.
You really don't know anything about white ethnicities and can't admit that you're just wrong.
>>3095
Dude, if the skin is White and make noises in English, they are Anglo. It is everything I need to know.
Dude, if the skin is White and make noises in English, they are Anglo. It is everything I need to know.
>>3096
That is the most ignorant, Americanized homogenous garbage I've ever heard. A pollack shitposting in English is Anglo? An Italian restaurant owner who greets tourists in English is anglo? A German car salesman is Anglo? An Irishman is Anglo? A Celt is Anglo? King Arthur, who led his people against the Anglo-Saxons, because he spoke English?
Do white ethnicities and tribes not matter to you?
That is the most ignorant, Americanized homogenous garbage I've ever heard. A pollack shitposting in English is Anglo? An Italian restaurant owner who greets tourists in English is anglo? A German car salesman is Anglo? An Irishman is Anglo? A Celt is Anglo? King Arthur, who led his people against the Anglo-Saxons, because he spoke English?
Do white ethnicities and tribes not matter to you?
>>3097
>Americanized homogenous garbage I've ever heard.
It is what it is. The race/ethnicity salad is far too advanced. It is very hard to know to what degree the blood contamination had advanced. To practical purposes they are all Anglo.
>Americanized homogenous garbage I've ever heard.
It is what it is. The race/ethnicity salad is far too advanced. It is very hard to know to what degree the blood contamination had advanced. To practical purposes they are all Anglo.
1704171570.jpg (24.1 KB, 490x313, V0LLa8uxGtsoEgTvsI38xobZPfSW2mdeS8S5Sbw1dbI.jpg)
>>3098
>It is very hard to know to what degree the blood
Maybe if you're completely ignorant to your own family history and bloodlines.
>To practical purposes they are all Anglo.
So all white people are aglo to you if they've ever spoken English on the internet. No Prussians, no Welsh, no Slavs, no Italians, no Irishmen, no Aryans, no Welsh, no Celts, no French just "Anglos".
Cool.
>It is very hard to know to what degree the blood
Maybe if you're completely ignorant to your own family history and bloodlines.
>To practical purposes they are all Anglo.
So all white people are aglo to you if they've ever spoken English on the internet. No Prussians, no Welsh, no Slavs, no Italians, no Irishmen, no Aryans, no Welsh, no Celts, no French just "Anglos".
Cool.
>>3099
>Maybe if you're completely ignorant to your own family history and bloodlines.
I'm not, but I'm completely ignorant of yours, so what you are is what I see.
>Maybe if you're completely ignorant to your own family history and bloodlines.
I'm not, but I'm completely ignorant of yours, so what you are is what I see.
>>3100
I don't have a drop of Anglo blood in me. I'm speaking English because this is /mlpol/.
>so what you are is what I see.
You've never met me, retard.
I was talking about the guy in the meme, who is clearly Italian.
I don't have a drop of Anglo blood in me. I'm speaking English because this is /mlpol/.
>so what you are is what I see.
You've never met me, retard.
I was talking about the guy in the meme, who is clearly Italian.
>>3102
Sure, faggot.
Have fun being a rootless Amerimutt untermensch with no family history or culture.
Sure, faggot.
Have fun being a rootless Amerimutt untermensch with no family history or culture.
Anonymous
No.3105
>>3104
Lmao, I don't have to claim it. It's you who couldn't even tell the difference between an Angelo an obvious Italian (with plausible Irish blood).
Lmao, I don't have to claim it. It's you who couldn't even tell the difference between an Angelo an obvious Italian (with plausible Irish blood).
Anonymous
No.3109
1704173476.png (718.4 KB, 5000x3942, d5vxvl1-54f2bf7d-07da-43b8-b5c8-a86a11d98636.png)
>>3107
Oh yeah, it's not like my family's crest is sitting right there on the mantle. I totally feel so belittled by the "royal" who thinks all English speakers are anglos.
Oh yeah, it's not like my family's crest is sitting right there on the mantle. I totally feel so belittled by the "royal" who thinks all English speakers are anglos.
1704253156.jpg (1.1 MB, 1170x1879, Tesla was right - Einstein was a fraud.jpeg)
Tesla was right - Einstein was a fraud.
Anonymous
No.3112
>>3099
>So all white people are aglo to you if they've ever spoken English on the internet. No Prussians, no Welsh, no Slavs, no Italians, no Irishmen, no Aryans, no Welsh, no Celts, no French just "Anglos".
Pic related.
>So all white people are aglo to you if they've ever spoken English on the internet. No Prussians, no Welsh, no Slavs, no Italians, no Irishmen, no Aryans, no Welsh, no Celts, no French just "Anglos".
Pic related.
>>3111
Tesla never really found proof for the electric universe theory either though.
It would be really cool if it were true though. The idea of supplying free energy to anyone in the world without cables by harnessing the theoretically abundant energy of universe was Tesla's dream.
Einstein was certainly a fraud in some aspects, but his fraud came more from stealing other scientist's breakthroughs and publishing them in his own name without credit.
Thing about theory of relativity is that it's hard to prove because we as human beings are like 2D cartoons trying to interpret the composition of the 3D pencil that drew us. Time is an intangible force in the universe as far as we can tell and we have few ways of comprehending or testing how it actually works.
Tesla never really found proof for the electric universe theory either though.
It would be really cool if it were true though. The idea of supplying free energy to anyone in the world without cables by harnessing the theoretically abundant energy of universe was Tesla's dream.
Einstein was certainly a fraud in some aspects, but his fraud came more from stealing other scientist's breakthroughs and publishing them in his own name without credit.
Thing about theory of relativity is that it's hard to prove because we as human beings are like 2D cartoons trying to interpret the composition of the 3D pencil that drew us. Time is an intangible force in the universe as far as we can tell and we have few ways of comprehending or testing how it actually works.
>>3113
>we as human beings are like 2D cartoons trying to interpret the composition of the 3D pencil that drew us.
That's profound and thought provoking while at the same time gives Einstein's theory a credit that cannot be proven.
>we as human beings are like 2D cartoons trying to interpret the composition of the 3D pencil that drew us.
That's profound and thought provoking while at the same time gives Einstein's theory a credit that cannot be proven.
>>3119
Well, not with the technology we have now. They'll keep trying until they can confirm or deny it.
I think they're building another collider to test supernova tier particle physics to try and find some evidence for it.
Tbh, research out of the previous colliders has been pretty substantial, so I think it's actually cool to. It's at least better than sending money to niggers and Israel.
Well, not with the technology we have now. They'll keep trying until they can confirm or deny it.
I think they're building another collider to test supernova tier particle physics to try and find some evidence for it.
Tbh, research out of the previous colliders has been pretty substantial, so I think it's actually cool to. It's at least better than sending money to niggers and Israel.
>>3120
>Well, not with the technology we have now.
That's wishful thinking. Also (we) don't have anything, the collider operation is a closed project without transparency or accountability, sorta a black hole washing taxpayer's money.
>Well, not with the technology we have now.
That's wishful thinking. Also (we) don't have anything, the collider operation is a closed project without transparency or accountability, sorta a black hole washing taxpayer's money.
>>3121
>closed project without transparency or accountability
No it's not. There's institutions from some 80+ countries involved, they give tours of it all the time, and all it's findings are public domain.
They just made a new discovery about antimatter (I'll make a thread for that, if anyone cares).
>closed project without transparency or accountability
No it's not. There's institutions from some 80+ countries involved, they give tours of it all the time, and all it's findings are public domain.
They just made a new discovery about antimatter (I'll make a thread for that, if anyone cares).
>>3122
>There's institutions from some 80+ countries involved
Observers to cheer it up.
>they give tours of it all the time
Just trust us.
>and all it's findings are public domain
Garbage about subtatomic debris backed by theoretical math unable to pass a lab's scrutiny.
>a new discovery about antimatter
If the hoaxers can provide a sample to test in a laboratory surely wil get some attention. /s
>There's institutions from some 80+ countries involved
Observers to cheer it up.
>they give tours of it all the time
Just trust us.
>and all it's findings are public domain
Garbage about subtatomic debris backed by theoretical math unable to pass a lab's scrutiny.
>a new discovery about antimatter
If the hoaxers can provide a sample to test in a laboratory surely wil get some attention. /s
>>3121
>sorta a black hole washing taxpayer's money.
A drop in the bucket compared to what we send to welfare niggers, African shitholes and Israel every year. Most of it isn't even taxpayer funded at all, but fundraised by university research grants.
>>3123
>Just trust us.
What does transparency mean to you? What degree of accountability would you want?
>Garbage about subtatomic debris backed by theoretical math unable to pass a lab's scrutiny.
It's literally a laboratory to scrutinize theories.
If you have refutations to the readings from the lab, do share them.
>provide a sample to test in a laboratory
They already did that. That's how they make positrons. Look it up.
>sorta a black hole washing taxpayer's money.
A drop in the bucket compared to what we send to welfare niggers, African shitholes and Israel every year. Most of it isn't even taxpayer funded at all, but fundraised by university research grants.
>>3123
>Just trust us.
What does transparency mean to you? What degree of accountability would you want?
>Garbage about subtatomic debris backed by theoretical math unable to pass a lab's scrutiny.
It's literally a laboratory to scrutinize theories.
If you have refutations to the readings from the lab, do share them.
>provide a sample to test in a laboratory
They already did that. That's how they make positrons. Look it up.
>>3124
>provide a sample to test in a laboratory
>They already did that.
Source? Name of the laboratory and employees in charge?
>provide a sample to test in a laboratory
>They already did that.
Source? Name of the laboratory and employees in charge?
>>3125
>Name of the laboratory and employees in charge?
Jülich IKP-KFA, Erlangen-Nuernberg University, GSI Darmstadt and Genoa University, led by Walter Oelert, using the CERN1 LEAR.
>Name of the laboratory and employees in charge?
Jülich IKP-KFA, Erlangen-Nuernberg University, GSI Darmstadt and Genoa University, led by Walter Oelert, using the CERN1 LEAR.
>>3126
Gotta link? Also don't tell me is an internal CERN's laboratory with CERN's employees because we will be again at square one: Just Trust Us.
Gotta link? Also don't tell me is an internal CERN's laboratory with CERN's employees because we will be again at square one: Just Trust Us.
>>3127
He's not a CERN employee, he's a professor from the aforementioned university. Also, the CERN is a machine, not an employer.
He's not a CERN employee, he's a professor from the aforementioned university. Also, the CERN is a machine, not an employer.
>>3128
>Also, the CERN is a machine, not an employer.
CERN is a bureaucracy administrating a humongous amount of money under the guise of reasearch.
>Also, the CERN is a machine, not an employer.
CERN is a bureaucracy administrating a humongous amount of money under the guise of reasearch.
>>3129
>administrating a humongous amount of money under the guise of reasearch
It's really a tiny amount of money compared to other useless crap the government (s) spend on. If it was made to consolidate money, it isn't doing a very good job.
>administrating a humongous amount of money under the guise of reasearch
It's really a tiny amount of money compared to other useless crap the government (s) spend on. If it was made to consolidate money, it isn't doing a very good job.
>>3127
>Just Trust Us
What else would it take to earn your trust? I don't know what it is that you want. They got some readings that one of their nine antiprotons finally collided with a negatron after shooting them through a jet of xenon gas 33 billion times a second. Are you saying that the readings were false? All the inner workings of the machine are public domain: it's ultimately just a series of very strong magnets.
If you'd like to discuss it in detail, please make a thread about it. It's too late at night for me to debate the intricacies of particle physics, but I'm quite interested in the topic if you have any info to add about how a positron should behave under those circumstances.
>Just Trust Us
What else would it take to earn your trust? I don't know what it is that you want. They got some readings that one of their nine antiprotons finally collided with a negatron after shooting them through a jet of xenon gas 33 billion times a second. Are you saying that the readings were false? All the inner workings of the machine are public domain: it's ultimately just a series of very strong magnets.
If you'd like to discuss it in detail, please make a thread about it. It's too late at night for me to debate the intricacies of particle physics, but I'm quite interested in the topic if you have any info to add about how a positron should behave under those circumstances.
>>3131
>CERN's budget
According to (((them))) the 2023 budget is 1230.38 Million CHF = 1439.54 million U$D
>CERN's budget
According to (((them))) the 2023 budget is 1230.38 Million CHF = 1439.54 million U$D
>>3132
>It's too late at night for me to debate the intricacies of particle physics
Reminder that "atomic" physics is just and merely a "theory".
>It's too late at night for me to debate the intricacies of particle physics
Reminder that "atomic" physics is just and merely a "theory".
1704257837.gif (1.2 MB, 483x481, f71f72ebe9c47b937f9f0167ff641f04.gif)
>>3139
>Are you telling me that that is untrue?
I'm telling you, and according to academia, that there is not conclusive proof of that. That's the reason no professor or scientist will put his career on the line claiming the "Atomic Theory" is real. Then they play safe by claiming is actually a "model" for interpretation of the matter.
>Are you telling me that that is untrue?
I'm telling you, and according to academia, that there is not conclusive proof of that. That's the reason no professor or scientist will put his career on the line claiming the "Atomic Theory" is real. Then they play safe by claiming is actually a "model" for interpretation of the matter.
>>3140
Actually, there's quite a bit of proof that atoms are real. Atomic theory is called a theory because most scientific concepts are called theories. The theory has changed over time as it has been revealed that atoms are not indivisible as we once thought.
>Then they play safe by claiming is actually a "model" for interpretation of the matter.
That's just how science works
So do you or do you not believe in atomic theory?
Actually, there's quite a bit of proof that atoms are real. Atomic theory is called a theory because most scientific concepts are called theories. The theory has changed over time as it has been revealed that atoms are not indivisible as we once thought.
>Then they play safe by claiming is actually a "model" for interpretation of the matter.
That's just how science works
So do you or do you not believe in atomic theory?
>>3141
>Actually, there's quite a bit of proof that atoms are real.
Sure, I'm aware of lab's testing pointing at that, but to claim that atoms are in this way ot that way is an interpolation.
>Actually, there's quite a bit of proof that atoms are real.
Sure, I'm aware of lab's testing pointing at that, but to claim that atoms are in this way ot that way is an interpolation.
>>3140
>That's the reason no professor or scientist will put his career on the line claiming the "Atomic Theory" is r
Every professor or scientist you meet will tell you that atomic theory is true. It's accepted as fact by most scientists that atoms are real.
There is no president of science or other person with the authority to decide what or when models are facts instead of theories, that's why models are called theories indefinitely.
>That's the reason no professor or scientist will put his career on the line claiming the "Atomic Theory" is r
Every professor or scientist you meet will tell you that atomic theory is true. It's accepted as fact by most scientists that atoms are real.
There is no president of science or other person with the authority to decide what or when models are facts instead of theories, that's why models are called theories indefinitely.
>>3143
>Every professor or scientist you meet will tell you that atomic theory is true.
Of course, the same than paleontologists claiming that Evolution is real. After all they have to follow the establishment's narrative to make their careers. That said, not one will risk their monetary incoming when challenged and will play safe.
>Every professor or scientist you meet will tell you that atomic theory is true.
Of course, the same than paleontologists claiming that Evolution is real. After all they have to follow the establishment's narrative to make their careers. That said, not one will risk their monetary incoming when challenged and will play safe.
>>3142
>to claim that atoms are in this way ot that way is an interpolation.
That's why they're smashing them together with extremely strong magnets and try to make sense of the energy signals they give off thereafter.
>to claim that atoms are in this way ot that way is an interpolation.
That's why they're smashing them together with extremely strong magnets and try to make sense of the energy signals they give off thereafter.
>>3147
>and try to make sense of the energy signals they give off thereafter
Ah, that the key sentence. Energy signals in the form of x-rays and gamma longitude which is actually radiation but they publish it as "debris" to trick the uneducated normies.
>and try to make sense of the energy signals they give off thereafter
Ah, that the key sentence. Energy signals in the form of x-rays and gamma longitude which is actually radiation but they publish it as "debris" to trick the uneducated normies.
>>3148
>but they publish it as "debris"
I go further. Those charlatans publish pictures of pseudo particles, because they claim are actual subatomic particles, and ask for more money. In reality what the pictures show are "traces" of radiation impacting whatever their are using as a sensor to register the event. To claim those are particles is a looooooooooooong stretch.
>but they publish it as "debris"
I go further. Those charlatans publish pictures of pseudo particles, because they claim are actual subatomic particles, and ask for more money. In reality what the pictures show are "traces" of radiation impacting whatever their are using as a sensor to register the event. To claim those are particles is a looooooooooooong stretch.
Anonymous
No.3151
>>3149
>Have you ever tried talking to new reporters?
No need, I know physics and I may assisted to some lab. I'm know what I'm talking about. Do not fall for the narrative of what is our reality.
>Have you ever tried talking to new reporters?
No need, I know physics and I may assisted to some lab. I'm know what I'm talking about. Do not fall for the narrative of what is our reality.
>>3148
>is actually radiation but they publish it as "debris"
Radiation and debris are arguably the same thing. Atoms and their components aren't objects; they're more like knots of energy or EM waves. I like to think of them as music notes in a song. Electrons and Photons are simultaneously particles and waves, but you can also think of them as a cloud.
And the type of radiation is also really indicative of what the particles did after dissipating, because as matter is converted into energy the amount of energy released can determine what happened.
Also could be promising for engineering discoveries, such as advanced fusion reactors.
>to trick the uneducated normies.
Most normies don't actually care if a neutron split in two pieces is given a name. None of them even seemed to care that an anti-hydrogen atom was recently created. Only nerds like me bother to read this stuff.
>>3150
The pictures are just visual aids because they're impossible to conceptualize anyway. Particles that act like waves or fields of energy don't look like beads; they don't look like anything at all in fact.
>To claim those are particles is a looooooooooooong stretch
That's a fair point. A lot of the particles they're to creating are so unnatural and unstable that they dissipate instantly, and the only proof of their existence is that they produced the correct expected type of waves based on the math.
>is actually radiation but they publish it as "debris"
Radiation and debris are arguably the same thing. Atoms and their components aren't objects; they're more like knots of energy or EM waves. I like to think of them as music notes in a song. Electrons and Photons are simultaneously particles and waves, but you can also think of them as a cloud.
And the type of radiation is also really indicative of what the particles did after dissipating, because as matter is converted into energy the amount of energy released can determine what happened.
Also could be promising for engineering discoveries, such as advanced fusion reactors.
>to trick the uneducated normies.
Most normies don't actually care if a neutron split in two pieces is given a name. None of them even seemed to care that an anti-hydrogen atom was recently created. Only nerds like me bother to read this stuff.
>>3150
The pictures are just visual aids because they're impossible to conceptualize anyway. Particles that act like waves or fields of energy don't look like beads; they don't look like anything at all in fact.
>To claim those are particles is a looooooooooooong stretch
That's a fair point. A lot of the particles they're to creating are so unnatural and unstable that they dissipate instantly, and the only proof of their existence is that they produced the correct expected type of waves based on the math.
>>3152
>Atoms and their components aren't objects; they're more like knots of energy or EM waves
You are confusing matter with its manifestation of optic light, also called photons.
>Atoms and their components aren't objects; they're more like knots of energy or EM waves
You are confusing matter with its manifestation of optic light, also called photons.
>>3156
>Once you get into subatomic particles
Well, it is the field of charlatans claiming to be discovering the holy new thing, they may know something about to tinker with matter, but the interpretation of what they are dealing with has, and according to them, a great latitude.
>Once you get into subatomic particles
Well, it is the field of charlatans claiming to be discovering the holy new thing, they may know something about to tinker with matter, but the interpretation of what they are dealing with has, and according to them, a great latitude.
Anonymous
No.3159
>>3149
>So a drop in the ocean
My point exactly. It's barely taking in any money considering the scale of the project and the number of actors involved. If it disappeared tomorrow your taxes would not change one cent.
>So a drop in the ocean
My point exactly. It's barely taking in any money considering the scale of the project and the number of actors involved. If it disappeared tomorrow your taxes would not change one cent.
>>3160
>fascinating
I agree, but take into account that most of their "ideas" are based in "Theoretical Physics" which is also based on "Theoretical Math", which is based on math tricks such as multi-dimensional matrices with not correlation with the physical world.
>fascinating
I agree, but take into account that most of their "ideas" are based in "Theoretical Physics" which is also based on "Theoretical Math", which is based on math tricks such as multi-dimensional matrices with not correlation with the physical world.
>>3161
>not correlation with the physical world
Oh sure, nuclear fusion reactors are totally irrelevant. No point in researching those
>not correlation with the physical world
Oh sure, nuclear fusion reactors are totally irrelevant. No point in researching those
>>3162
>nuclear fusion reactors are totally irrelevant
Name an actual one functioning. The theory sounds great but its implementation is science fiction.
>nuclear fusion reactors are totally irrelevant
Name an actual one functioning. The theory sounds great but its implementation is science fiction.
>>3167
>It's already generated plasma fields.
I'm not arguing that as it can be done in a home lab.
What I'm arguing is its capability to be used a mass energy supply for a city. I mean its characteristics to be economically viable and not a simple project for burning money.
Allow me to clarify; all these "marvelous" devices are propped as the new tech, the vanguard, the future, however the KEY for all of them to be practical is the power relation input/output. Then the input of power/energy MUST be lower than the output. Can that be possible? As the current technology is developed, I very much doubt it.
>It's already generated plasma fields.
I'm not arguing that as it can be done in a home lab.
What I'm arguing is its capability to be used a mass energy supply for a city. I mean its characteristics to be economically viable and not a simple project for burning money.
Allow me to clarify; all these "marvelous" devices are propped as the new tech, the vanguard, the future, however the KEY for all of them to be practical is the power relation input/output. Then the input of power/energy MUST be lower than the output. Can that be possible? As the current technology is developed, I very much doubt it.
>>3168
>What I'm arguing is its capability to be used a mass energy supply for a city.
Just last year it created a net positive yield, which is a huge deal because it means that given some time to optimize it could generate enormous amounts of energy with no waste and barely any fuel.
Which is why researching the science behind it is important.
>What I'm arguing is its capability to be used a mass energy supply for a city.
Just last year it created a net positive yield, which is a huge deal because it means that given some time to optimize it could generate enormous amounts of energy with no waste and barely any fuel.
Which is why researching the science behind it is important.
>>3168
Seeing as submarines and aircraft carriers run entirely on nuclear technology, I fail to see how a city can't be.
Seeing as submarines and aircraft carriers run entirely on nuclear technology, I fail to see how a city can't be.
>>3170
>Seeing as submarines and aircraft carriers run entirely on nuclear technology
That is totally different tech. Current nuclear energy is so simple as to heat a boiler to generate steam, which spins a turbine, which spins a electric generator. No much science is involved in that.
>>3168
>because it means that given some time to optimize
Okay, you rest on faith. I'm don't want to be a contrarian, but to my knowledge, the fusion technology is at least 50 years away for commercial deployment.
>Seeing as submarines and aircraft carriers run entirely on nuclear technology
That is totally different tech. Current nuclear energy is so simple as to heat a boiler to generate steam, which spins a turbine, which spins a electric generator. No much science is involved in that.
>>3168
>because it means that given some time to optimize
Okay, you rest on faith. I'm don't want to be a contrarian, but to my knowledge, the fusion technology is at least 50 years away for commercial deployment.
>>3168
>Then the input of power/energy MUST be lower than the output.
It's like a bastardized chemical exothermic reaction.
Getting the two components to bond ejects a high energy neutron (proton and election bonded tightly), the conditions is tons of heat, movement and those two isotopes.
>>3171
>Current nuclear energy is so simple as to heat a boiler to generate steam,
One of the fusion reactors shunts the hot high energy neutron to coolent aka basically water and you know what would happen next.
Other types attempt other things.
>Then the input of power/energy MUST be lower than the output.
It's like a bastardized chemical exothermic reaction.
Getting the two components to bond ejects a high energy neutron (proton and election bonded tightly), the conditions is tons of heat, movement and those two isotopes.
>>3171
>Current nuclear energy is so simple as to heat a boiler to generate steam,
One of the fusion reactors shunts the hot high energy neutron to coolent aka basically water and you know what would happen next.
Other types attempt other things.
>>3169
>it could generate enormous amounts of energy with no waste and barely any fuel.
To give you a taste of the holy grail those scientists and the oligarchs funding them are after:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perpetual_motion
>it could generate enormous amounts of energy with no waste and barely any fuel.
To give you a taste of the holy grail those scientists and the oligarchs funding them are after:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perpetual_motion
Anonymous
No.3176
>>3171
>fusion technology is at least 50 years away for commercial deployment.
That's only one generation.
>fusion technology is at least 50 years away for commercial deployment.
That's only one generation.
>>3175
>lots of other stuff
Yeah, isotope galore ready to be chemically reprocessed for mainly nuclear medicine.
>lots of other stuff
Yeah, isotope galore ready to be chemically reprocessed for mainly nuclear medicine.
>>3177
Also technology adapting to an indulgent surplus of available energy. Electric water desalination could make agriculture easier. Electric mills could synthesize steel and other polymers for cheap. Much faster internet, etc.
Imagine life when electricity costs for most mundane things becomes negligible.
Also technology adapting to an indulgent surplus of available energy. Electric water desalination could make agriculture easier. Electric mills could synthesize steel and other polymers for cheap. Much faster internet, etc.
Imagine life when electricity costs for most mundane things becomes negligible.
>>3178
>Imagine life when electricity costs for most mundane things becomes negligible.
Sorry anon but I believe you are drunk in jewish lies,
Technologies are NOT in humanity hands, but jewish hands. Do you really believe jews will make available such benefits for a negligible price as you fantasize it? Really?
>Imagine life when electricity costs for most mundane things becomes negligible.
Sorry anon but I believe you are drunk in jewish lies,
Technologies are NOT in humanity hands, but jewish hands. Do you really believe jews will make available such benefits for a negligible price as you fantasize it? Really?
>>3179
>implying I'm not involved in the implementation of this infrastructure
I believe they'll do what's profitable. There is a lot of money to be made in this tech.
Jews already own all of the oil rigs and mineral mines and still sell them for energy. If nuclear energy becomes profitable they'll use it too.
>implying I'm not involved in the implementation of this infrastructure
I believe they'll do what's profitable. There is a lot of money to be made in this tech.
Jews already own all of the oil rigs and mineral mines and still sell them for energy. If nuclear energy becomes profitable they'll use it too.
Anonymous
No.3182
>>3180
>implying I'm not involved in the implementation of this infrastructure
Perhaps, but only to the point of deploying it as a contracted goyim. To be an employee doesn't give the right to own the (((company)))'s tools.
>implying I'm not involved in the implementation of this infrastructure
Perhaps, but only to the point of deploying it as a contracted goyim. To be an employee doesn't give the right to own the (((company)))'s tools.
>>3181
>Solution: remove Jews.
At this point a fantasy. There are millions on the jew's payroll and most of them are more than willing to kill for a steady flow of shekels.
>Solution: remove Jews.
At this point a fantasy. There are millions on the jew's payroll and most of them are more than willing to kill for a steady flow of shekels.
>>3183
What a cowardly cop-out. Just surrendering to the Jews like a cuck because the battle is up hill.
What a cowardly cop-out. Just surrendering to the Jews like a cuck because the battle is up hill.
Anonymous
No.3191
>>3190
It is what it is. Make an assessment and act according to it. Remember, your own neighbors will be the first to point at you.
It is what it is. Make an assessment and act according to it. Remember, your own neighbors will be the first to point at you.
>>3192
Whatever you say faggot.
I'm the meantime, I'll be doing my job as usual. Maybe some corporate kikes benefit from it, but that won't stop me from pursuit of artifice.
Whatever you say faggot.
I'm the meantime, I'll be doing my job as usual. Maybe some corporate kikes benefit from it, but that won't stop me from pursuit of artifice.
>>3171
Spinning turbines is how you make power moron. All power technology is based on that. Burn coal and it heats water, spins turbine. Windmill directly turns a turbine. Water dams pour water through a turbine. Nuclear power is heating water and turns a turbine. The fuck do you mean it is different?
Spinning turbines is how you make power moron. All power technology is based on that. Burn coal and it heats water, spins turbine. Windmill directly turns a turbine. Water dams pour water through a turbine. Nuclear power is heating water and turns a turbine. The fuck do you mean it is different?
>>3195
>The fuck do you mean it is different?
>illiterate in tech drops his oppinion
Fusion vs Fission ring a bell?
Read the thread again, nigger.
>The fuck do you mean it is different?
>illiterate in tech drops his oppinion
Fusion vs Fission ring a bell?
Read the thread again, nigger.
Anonymous
No.3197
>>3196
Nuclear Fusion still produces heat that can fuel a turbine; the mechanics behind the generator is still just boiling water.
Nuclear Fusion still produces heat that can fuel a turbine; the mechanics behind the generator is still just boiling water.
>>3196
How about you read my post again, double nigger? I said they are the same through turbine electrical generation. You respond with one splits atoms and one combines. Fucking hell you are hopelessly stupid. If a fission reactor can power a sub or aircraft carrier, a fusion one can too, and same goes for a city. Power is power. You get power for one device, it can scale to multiple across a power grid. That is how we have coal that powered a train now powering cities, retard.
How about you read my post again, double nigger? I said they are the same through turbine electrical generation. You respond with one splits atoms and one combines. Fucking hell you are hopelessly stupid. If a fission reactor can power a sub or aircraft carrier, a fusion one can too, and same goes for a city. Power is power. You get power for one device, it can scale to multiple across a power grid. That is how we have coal that powered a train now powering cities, retard.
Anonymous
No.3200
>>3199
Scale is normally a problem, but with the power available with nuclear technology, scale isn't really the issue. Cost is. Coal was hard to scale from operating a single engine to operating enough turbines to make sure the power doesn't drop over thousands of homes. Nuclear is far more reliable at scale, but you need all of this tech to make it work. Furthermore, there are better materials that would generate hundreds of times more energy than current material, but because the tech for what we have is already made, no one wants to upgrade and relearn the process.
Scale is normally a problem, but with the power available with nuclear technology, scale isn't really the issue. Cost is. Coal was hard to scale from operating a single engine to operating enough turbines to make sure the power doesn't drop over thousands of homes. Nuclear is far more reliable at scale, but you need all of this tech to make it work. Furthermore, there are better materials that would generate hundreds of times more energy than current material, but because the tech for what we have is already made, no one wants to upgrade and relearn the process.
Anonymous
No.3202
Anonymous
No.3205
1704664971.mp4 (2.6 MB, Resolution:640x366 Length:00:00:37, html5mediaembed-8o7Dl837Bscl-1.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Anonymous
No.3210
1705157734.mp4 (3.3 MB, Resolution:618x1100 Length:00:00:25, Wideningcandiedcrafty_00a22d_11234877.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Anonymous
No.3224
Anonymous
No.3250
A study in Australia found out bad parenting means children don't develop language as well.
Same study blames technology for bad parenting.
Because the parents aren't speaking to children and aren't using new adult words the child gets handicapped and speaks much less than those of a similar age.
This is how another pillar the collapse occurrs, shear neglect as the tried and true means of knowledge transfer crumbles even more.
Setting a kid down infront of a tablet isn't enough.
Because of the exhausting of time (labor, distractions, ect.) deliberately choosing to have quality time is increasingly important and difficult.
I wonder what happens when massive waves of unsocialized people do their thing.
Same study blames technology for bad parenting.
Because the parents aren't speaking to children and aren't using new adult words the child gets handicapped and speaks much less than those of a similar age.
This is how another pillar the collapse occurrs, shear neglect as the tried and true means of knowledge transfer crumbles even more.
Setting a kid down infront of a tablet isn't enough.
Because of the exhausting of time (labor, distractions, ect.) deliberately choosing to have quality time is increasingly important and difficult.
I wonder what happens when massive waves of unsocialized people do their thing.
He says our HP printer when he really means their HP printer.
Anonymous
No.3267
>>3264
HP sucks, new DYMO thermal printers suck now also because they added the same DRM stuff printers use, if you don't use DYMO brand labels it won't print
HP sucks, new DYMO thermal printers suck now also because they added the same DRM stuff printers use, if you don't use DYMO brand labels it won't print
Anonymous
No.3550
I'm swinging by to try to learn some more about some e-ink e-readers.
I hear that on a hardware level, the amazon kindle ones are pretty great, but that they trap you in an ecosystem that restricts you while force-feeding you advertisement and mandating that you sign up and make accounts.
I just want a way to read epubs comfortably and be able to see the cover art and the chapter art of stories that have them. There's a backlog of stuff from the books threads, fimfiction, and tons of greentexts that I want to read, but I keep skipping around on the computer and would like to sit on a bench in a park or go for a walk innawoods and get some quality time with some words.
I kinda understand how to use Calibre, but only occasionally use it to open an epub file. I do not have an organized and managed library.
I hear that on a hardware level, the amazon kindle ones are pretty great, but that they trap you in an ecosystem that restricts you while force-feeding you advertisement and mandating that you sign up and make accounts.
I just want a way to read epubs comfortably and be able to see the cover art and the chapter art of stories that have them. There's a backlog of stuff from the books threads, fimfiction, and tons of greentexts that I want to read, but I keep skipping around on the computer and would like to sit on a bench in a park or go for a walk innawoods and get some quality time with some words.
I kinda understand how to use Calibre, but only occasionally use it to open an epub file. I do not have an organized and managed library.
[Last 50 Posts] [Last 100 Posts] [Last 200 Posts]
632 replies | 280 files | 87 UUIDs | Page 5
[Add to Thread Watcher]