14 replies and 13 files omitted.
What did they mean by this?
Did you post >>1475
? If so, do you believe the NASA stuff and agree that science rocks?
Science is the atheist religion. Its believers rival extremist religious fanatics and is wise to keep them at a distance.
is it not cool that we can now see many more things in the sky and see things that we could see before in greater detail than we have?
>>1480>things in the sky
Not sure if you are referring to the Flat Earth thread, but the scope of to put brakes on your enthusiasm about science has to do with the evil brought by it.
See >>>/mlpol/304338 →
Imagine unironically thinking this
>>1481>the evil brought by it
science is merely a tool, it can be used for both good and evil depending on who's trying to use it for what purpose. After all, the same findings that gave us the atom bomb also gave us the basis for nuclear plants, so to blame science for the actions of men is the same logical niggotry as blaming guns for the actions of people. Don't be a nigger, let us enjoy these new findings.
You realize he probably thinks they're fake, right?
I mean, take a look at the 'rona breads. Sure there is valuable information there, but there's also a fuck ton of schizos.
These fellas have been so thoroughly fucked, that they've even praised Ted Kaczynski at some point. Despite the fact he's a confirmed victim of MK-ultra.
The flat earthers seem to be faking it for attention. Respond to their bullshit offensively while expending less effort than them, and they ignore you. They want to waste the time of people taking the flat earth "debate" more seriously than them.
There's is nothing "evil" about science. Science is a godly pursuit: to better understand and appreciate God's creation. The scientific method is just a tool to learn things about life.
The only """evil""" that comes about it is when corrupt journalists and politicians misattribute scientific terminology to push their individual agendas or spin media narratives. That's not science; it's just politics.
Science isn't a religion. Most scientists are religious. A lot of the biggest breakthroughs in science have been done by Christians.
>>1489>Science isn't a religion.
Buddha isn't a religion either, but his followers turned him into one. Same with science.>Most scientists are religious.
Gimma a break. Scientists are so invested in their bullshit that are unable to seek knowledge outside their "peer reviewed" sanitized opinions.
Fucking checked, this, omfg
Notice that the flaggit is posting smug twilight in a thread otherwise unrelated except by mention, rather than face, own up to, or admitting that he has AGAIN been destroyed in his own thread and has abandoned
>>1494>admitting that he has AGAIN been destroyed in his own thread and has abandoned
Wishful thinking won't change the outcome. Science and specially its spawn, technology, are evil.
Science is literally just the practice of observing facts.
This is the science board. You can expect people to talk about science here. If you don't like science, just hide and ignore.
>>1496>Science is literally just the practice of observing facts.
Not quite. Humans in their all embracing arrogance want to emulate God. A balance between knowledge and wisdom must be maintained.
Nothing about science excludes what you just said. Science isn't mutually exclusive with faith at all. Only fedora-tipping faggots or defensive retards think it should be.
>>1499>Science isn't mutually exclusive with faith at all.
I'm not religious at all, but science is the fundamental pillar of modern atheism, just saying.
>>1492>unable to seek knowledge outside their "peer reviewed" sanitized opinions
Because that's not their jobs. Science is about exoteric knowledge. Spirituality/faith is esoteric knowledge, and can't be understood through scientific study.
Science can only tell you about the observable world around you, which is useful, but isn't a substitute for spirituality.
>>1501>Spirituality/faith is esoteric knowledge, and can't be understood through scientific study.
Glad you brought it. Particle physicists have abandoned the scientific method and embraced sorcery.
Atheists like to say that, but science up to and throughout the 20th century has largely been driven by religious people, often even in the name of religion.
Nomenclature, taxonomy, genealogy, etc. we're led by religious people, who considered it a godly endeavor to understand the world around them, not a contradiction to their faith.
Yup, those "scientists" use charlatanry and pseudoscience instead of the proven scientific method. By the way, all funded and promoted by their bureaucracies.
>>1505>"scientists" use charlatanry and pseudoscience instead of the proven scientific method. By the way, all funded and promoted by their bureaucracies.
On that, we can agree. Pseudoscience is the bane of science.
I wouldn't say that the entire field of particle physics is pseudoscience, but it's full of faggots who keep writing unprovable theoretical nonsense to keep the grants flowing.
We are tacking off course. The subject is that technology is evil. Should be a clamp down on science?
Back to the Flat Earth bread please. >>>/vx/148613 →
Wtf does this have to do with flat earth?
The flat earth thread is about flat earth arguments. It is not "astrology general", nor does it demand any monopoly on the subject of planets, or photographs thereof.
>>1512>The flat earth thread is about flat earth arguments.
I've got you. A thread with telescope pics is about the heliocentric theory.
I honestly don't care what you call it. I'm not putting the new telescope photos in the flat earth thread. I'll make a telescope thread this week.
I hope you have enough autism to keep it going for weeks, months, or even years if necessary.
Why does it have to go on for weeks?
Clearly you havent dealt with our resident flat earther
It wouldn't be about flat earth discussion. That would stay in its current thread.
you havent dealt with pur resident flat earther
Flat eartherism is a glowie psyop to discredit sites where being pro-flat earth is permitted
this, I refuse to believe that people who are legitimately stupid enough to believe that the Earth is flat after multiple millennia (dating all the way back to ancient Greece, in fact) of people knowing that the contrary is true to have any idea of how to actually navigate the internet. Everything else is feds trying to make us look like idiots.
I have. I just refuse to entertain the notion of that argument spilling into every space thread on this separate board.>>1521>>1522
So let's keep that discussion in its own thread.
Foreign intelligence agencies must be rubbing their hands at what potential there now is thanks to the power of diversity hires
What no crop rotation and green fertilization does to a man
That is like straight out of Dennou Coil. https://youtu.be/OF_stn8v030?t=121
Beautiful anime, a pity it has not subtitles.
Explanation to this one is simple: computers are just actual demons trapped inside silicon infrastructures and "enslaved" to the will of the programmer. There is no such thing as artificial intelligence, only demonic intelligence
>>1557>computers are just actual demons trapped inside silicon infrastructures and "enslaved" to the will of the programmer.
I'm thinking in the nature of electricity, magnetism, and the atomic "theory" (never ever anyponer has seen an atom, let alone an electron).
If "computers are demons" what does that make computer programs?
An interpreted language to give instructions to the demons.
>>1558>(never ever anyponer has seen an atom, let alone an electron)
You do realize that there are other ways to indicate that something exists other than direct empiricism, right? Setting the bar to only things you can see with the naked eye is an impossible standard of evidence.
>>1557>There is no such thing as artificial intelligence
Artificial intelligence is just a series of algorithms and input-output flowcharts. At what point in the process does there even need to be a 'demon' if that demon only amounts to a glorified button-presser?
Ah, wait, it seems the irony of that post was lost on me.
>>1561>You do realize that there are other ways to indicate that something exists other than direct empiricism, right?
Of course. That exactly the reason why assumptions are labeled "theories".
>>1562>Artificial intelligence is just a series of algorithms and input-output flowcharts.
Correct. AI is mostly a buzzword.>At what point in the process does there even need to be a 'demon' if that demon only amounts to a glorified button-presser?
If the idea of demons inside chips is correct, then demons are tasked to move electrical states from buffer to buffer, like NAND and NOR gates and alike.
>>1565>If the idea of demons inside chips is correct, then demons are tasked to move electrical states from buffer to buffer, like NAND and NOR gates and alike.
We are getting closer and closer to the autistic ASSEMBLER language.
Theories are based on evidence and logic, not assumption. An assumption is just a hypothesis.
>>1565>demons are tasked to move electrical states from buffer to buffer, like NAND and NOR gates and alike.
Why would you even need demons for such a menial, unintelligent task? We have circuit boards.
>>1569>An assumption is just a hypothesis.
Correct, and in science those hypothesis are labeled theories. Because science is never settled and is always evolving, those assumptions/theories/hypothesis are expected to be demolished and replaced by new ones.
An hypothesis is an assumption before research/experimentation, a theory is made to explain data generated from said research. Get it right faggot.
And yet to explain the atomic theory, demons may have their place.
>>1573>in science those hypothesis are labeled theories
That's not science at all. That's just positivism and corporate media manipulation. Don't misconstrue pseudoscience with actual science.
Theories are based on evidence and data. They're subject to change as new discoveries are made, but they're more than just assumptions.
It makes you wonder, what the fuck is going on inside those silicon layers and on the disk's platters.
>>1570>Why would you even need demons for such a menial, unintelligent task? We have circuit boards.
It is possible demons are using the electric devices as portals to our realm.
Why would demons need electrical devices to do such a thing? What component of the device is the portal?
>>1600>What component of the device is the portal?
Did you even watch the video?
No, I didn't yet. I was asking you what your take from it was before if I decide that this is worth 10 minutes of my time.
Pretty much this.
Also it gets interesting when you consider the almost exponential increasing of hard drives' capacity. When you dismount an old unit and compare it against the new ones, and consider the platter' surface square millimeters involved, there is something really fishy about it.
>>1608>platter' surface square millimeters involved, there is something really fishy about it
Not really, tbh. Microstructures and material engineering drastically multiply surface area.
>>1610>Microstructures and material engineering
After the covid psyop, science and scientists lost all credibility. Any claim is in doubt and needs independent assessment, even the very foundations of matter, such us the periodic table.
What kind of independent assessment? Who would do it?
These aren't studies observed by scientists; they're products made by engineers.
>>1612>the periodic table
What's disputed about the periodic table?
>>1612>science and scientists lost all credibility. Any claim is in doubt and needs independent assessment
That's what the peer review process is. Scientists review eachothers work all of the time. Sometimes they disagree, and sometimes they reaffirm studies.
It is understandable, but the framework laid to explain the physical world is amiss and with many loose ends..
>>1613>What kind of independent assessment? Who would do it?>These aren't studies observed by scientists; they're products made by engineers.
Let us see an example of independent assessment on science. Easily reproducible and ridiculous cheap.
If the experiment can be replicated, then all those "scientists" and "engineers" are making assumptions on the foundations of false theories. Let's watch.
>>1617>If the experiment can be replicated,
Do you really expect corporations to reveal the designs for their patented products? It's already hard enough to prevent chunks from stealing them.
I don't see the part where it implies demons are involved.
Even if they're keep secrets about methods, there's little evidence to suggest that it's anything special other than structural/material engineering on a small scale.
>>1610>Not really, tbh. Microstructures and material engineering drastically multiply surface area.>hard drives having insane capacities
That is what we are told. Closer inspection of a mechanic arm and its magnetic reader put in doubt the "scientific" narrative.
>>1643>Closer inspection of a mechanic arm and its magnetic reader put in doubt the "scientific" narrative.
What are you talking about?
I think anon was talking about square surface, track's dimensions, and surface's properties to storage digital data; plus the capacity of the magnetic reader to discriminate among tracks.
What does that have to do with demons?
I believe it is about fake science not able to perform as published and therefore something fishy inside the hardware.
Saying it's demons is still jumping to conclusions.
True, but a valid theory nevertheless.
A theory is based on evidence and testing. That's just a hypothesis.
>>1690>A theory is based on evidence and testing
Evidence shows that behind the eyes limitations there is another realm and the beings living there my cross to ours under certain conditions and cause physical manifestations.
There's still no evidence to suggest that record players are somehow powered by demons, let alone testing.
Okay, I understand now. You are an atheist and cannot see.
I didn't say that, nigger. I am naturally skeptical of ideas that suggest that my phone is powered by demons.>cannot see
Nobody can "see" that sort of thing, retard. It's not exoteric knowledge, it's esoteric: it is not empirical evidence that you can see. So when you say you have "evidence" of it, please explain what evidence it is you have, because that would be fascinating.
I'm sure that crazy abomination is not joking.
This is why I'm not an organ donor.
Ironically, this was written by a black guy.
>>1845>a nugget in space.
Nobody told him that space is a hoax.
reject modernity, return to single celled organism
Reject modernity. Return to stardust.
Living pod from the Cyberpunk 2020 book.
What does /cyb/ think of biohacking?
Tranny meme. It'll only he cool if it can be weaponized to turn my enemies into pony waifus.
Why would you consider the technology that can improve human cognition and athletic ability to be a tranny meme? I understand there are a lot of troons in the biohacking scene and that a lot of that stuff is over hyped but that tech is making leaps and bounds. That technology could be very useful and it's biotech that isn't in the hands of major pharmaceutical companies, surely that is something good.
Also with more major advancements it could be used for pony waifu.
I think it's interesting enough to warrant it's own thread, if you have anything to say about it.
/cyb/ will sacrifice anything to the altar of progress. Take a guess.
/cyb/ is not one person. Also, what makes you say that? Everyone here is /mlpol/.
I'm not terribly familiar with it, but it I only ever inadvertently stumble across it when it's some random tranny wanting a robot pussy or something. People who are unhappy about their biology and use transhumanism as an autistic cope.>That technology could be very useful and it's biotech that isn't in the hands of major pharmaceutical companies, surely that is something good.
I just don't trust it and I can only see it being used against my race.>>1956
Sounds kind of like a fantasy buzzword to me, but I admittedly know quite little about it. Genetic engineering takes years, but I guess with advancements in tech it could some day be done quite rapidly.
Pic unrelated because I just visited
You know you can buy some of the equipment online, right? Like you can get an open source EEG for $200 or a tDCS device for around $100. It's something anyone can do and it's not terribly expensive.
I really doubt trannies would get any good use of it until well after it's widely implemented. It's more likely to be used for medicine and crop production.
Would it be feasible to make pony waifus within our lifetime?
If all necessary resources, funding, researchers and attention were allocated towards it and all ethical standards and obstacles were bulldozed, plausibly.
I'm surprised that I don't see more bronies on alogs.space/robowaifu. Seems like quadruped sexbots would solve a lot of engineering problems.
I've been watching some Cowboy Bebop lately: the setting has every planet in the solar system fully terraformed and inhabited by peaceful, agrarian rural societies by 2070. It's fantasy, but it's also pretty nice.
Environments are so messy in Cowboy Bebop and I think it's interesting that old people react to it with "omg this world feels so organic and lived in and natural" while younger people react with "jesus christ doesnt anyone clean in this universe? Why is everyone a fucking junkie? Christ some kid's playing the harmonica in a smoking room".
Cowboy Bebop is the best thing Japan ever made.
I get why small viruses aren't considered life but I just don't understand why giant viruses are considered nonliving while intracellular oblobigate bacteria like rickettsia are considered to be alive.
It's not really a question of size, but functionality. Viruses have no capability to reproduce on their own, and no biologica funtions other than to stick to and infect host cells. They technically can't even move on their own. They don't move, breed, eat, breath or fuck: they're better described as objects than living things; plausibly the vestige of some bygone cell-signalling method gone horribly wrong.
>>2158>Viruses have no capability to reproduce on their own, and no biologica funtions other than to stick to and infect host cells.
This is is also true of intracellular obligate bacteria.>They don't move, breed, eat, breath or fuck: they're better described as objects than living things; plausibly the vestige of some bygone cell-signalling method gone horribly wrong.
Giant viruses have all the nessicary genes for metabolism.
>>2170>have all the nessicary genes for metabolism.
What? What kinds of metabolic functions do they even have? Do they have any catabolic or anabolic activities?
"schi-fi"? I don't understand the joke.
The joke is that the board is full of schizos. Schizophrenia starts with /sch/.
"Storing explosions and taking them home to put them somewhere more useful" indeed. We can get hydrogen from places far less dangerous than the sun.