>>137607>The proportions of the sphere should allow the individual the space to work and gesture in, without exiting, to my intuition and practice
Enough space is always a important part, i have messed around with salt circles but not chalk ones so i know what a good size is but thanks for giving an in depth explanation, a symbol in the circle is a benefit so that you can sit on it or have it underneath you as a way of it going directly going into your aura, i use swastikas inside mine as a way of my energy being expelled from the circle easier, the inwards swastika makes going into yourself a more deeper exploration of yourself so when i am meditating it provides another factor to it, the circle by itself is pretty bland but with other meanings added to it you become more attached to it through a mental reminder.>In my experience, yes. The area and tools should already be sanctified, and by keeping them within the space one avoids unnecessary,... particles from landing on or around the tools.
Taint can envelop an area and has to be made clean thereafter, so it is best to keep a close eye on tools and whatnot, the tools can be charged with energy using different types of crystals and thus must remain clear of spiritual bacteria unless they are to hamper you instead of benefiting you.>That depends on the practitioner.
Always.>For example, a Viking practitioner might have tools that fit that culture.
The more personal the tool is the more connected you are to it.>A sailor would do likewise; in fact, one of those line pegs would make for a most excellent wand, staff, or rod.
A trinket from the seas depths is a clear example of a man from the sea.>The tools should fit the user, and whatever function they would prefer to have available from a utilitarian aspect, as well as metaphysical.
The function of the tool must be considered, you wouldn't go buying knifes and pick a butter knife for a dinner party, it's common sense.>You just noticed?
Well by reading the posts in this thread you can probably guess i made a evaluation of you from the get go, i'm just clarifying that you are indeed king cunt.>Depending on the response, that's one possible outcome.
It's like asking someone about the Jews or Negros, there's always a certain type of response that follows after as you probably know, the way they react from the expressions and body language to words says it all, judgement's on the internet do not work the same way so i cannot properly deduct your movements like i would a horse, you cannot make a complete estimation of someone before having entered their circle of influence.>In other cases its to rattle a person's cage and see how flustered or resolute their response is.
There is a couple of ways to do that but the way you present yourself should be made more discreet in order to hide your knowledge, you came in like a angry teacher who dislikes emotions so it was easy to see how you were prodding me, you are adapted to it too much and your game is clear from the way you dissect how i labeled you, you pick apart the things that conflict the most with your beliefs so it is made obvious that your opinions are independently crafted, you wrote you have experience with arguing with leftists on the internet which let me know that you know the nature of this shit talking game, it was a lead that i understood clearly, it was a reference to how you have done this before so i knew what you were trying to achieve, it was a flaw in your tactic to let me know you have experience in it so i advise you to not let too much on again, also your argumentative posts are very repetitive and it is very easy for me to see that so i would give you a hint that a change up would create a better result from the other person along with your original style, a creative combination of insults works best to annoy someone as it is like a form of poetry to me, the rhyming of ass stinging is what makes me a druid of mare fluid, it's the work of bastard bard but is necessary to become a druid of stupid rivalry.>But that's just one of the cards I will play when getting a measure of a person.
It's one of the most important ones, it's a necessity as without it underestimation of one becomes quick so it's a wise card to keep by, i use varying stimuli to be capable of understanding my rival or romance.>Its far more a matter of gauging whether there is function in engaging the person honestly and unreservedly, than it is an attempt to pass judgement.
The quicker someone decides to love or hate the faster his mental walls will fall, if you prefer quantity over quality than go ahead and make no judgement whatsoever or dwell on it very rarely then you will not be treat fairly, it's a fundamental part of socialization to place personal beliefs on others and individual standards as without it choosing an adequate friend becomes an impossibility if there is no biased standards at all.>One doesnt engage in conversations like this willy nilly, especially on the internet, and if I'm gonna, I'm gonna make damn sure it's not a waste of time in advance.
It's better to preserve knowledge than have it completely open to another one who feeds from others so serpents must be separated from potential servants, the better someone is in intelligence the better their beliefs generally are, there's a reason why the typical Negro is robbed by his false friends.>>137608
Measurements do not always need to be as completely precise as this but it's nice to know just how big your dick is sometimes.
Seriously thanks for this, altars do need precision to become a place of power as there is a reason why things are ordered so neatly in a church or a synagogue other than just for showing off.