Could /mlpol/ Benefit From A Blue Pony Board?
Posters in this community have brought of various ways to make the site more attractive to horsefuckers and content creators. One reccomended idea has been to introduce a blue board for pony content.
Is this idea worth trying?
What could the benefits be?
Express your thoughts.
Continued from the discussion in the Roe v Wade Thread >>>/mlpol/344423 →
/qa/ - Questions and Answers
Keeping the community together by giving you a voice
Merry Christmas and Happy Hearth's Warming Everyone and Everypony!
[YouTube] The True Gift of GiftingIf you want to see the latest posts from all boards in a convenient way please check out /overboard/
File (): 0357C9DAEC769FBCA8417C6EB7230E75-406517.png
(397.0 KB, 1197x957, 4b4815ab17083d18da8d6d7ea85a6718f7efb8aed4cb1931eb401c4e934f3f1f.png)
250 replies and 124 files omitted.
>>7050
Just a couple of fair questions. Given that (you) and frens didn't give a flying hay for pol/aks, and worse yet, (you) and frens went so far as denigrate political content and therefore a pol/ak fly ensued so bad that currently the political content is nowhere to be seen.
Do (you) have any plan to repair the damage (you) have done? Also, do (you) have any expectation that your pony breads will go unmolested, as retaliation may ensue?
Just a couple of fair questions. Given that (you) and frens didn't give a flying hay for pol/aks, and worse yet, (you) and frens went so far as denigrate political content and therefore a pol/ak fly ensued so bad that currently the political content is nowhere to be seen.
Do (you) have any plan to repair the damage (you) have done? Also, do (you) have any expectation that your pony breads will go unmolested, as retaliation may ensue?
>>7068
Dude, I've been a /pol/ack since 2010. Wtf makes you think I don't like political content.
And not to brag, but on some months almost half of the political/news threads here are made by me.
>so bad that currently the political content is nowhere to be seen
This has been a problem I've been shouting about for years, but nobody listens.
>damage
Say what now?
Dude, I've been a /pol/ack since 2010. Wtf makes you think I don't like political content.
And not to brag, but on some months almost half of the political/news threads here are made by me.
>so bad that currently the political content is nowhere to be seen
This has been a problem I've been shouting about for years, but nobody listens.
>damage
Say what now?
File (): BD6BBB23F7E0A75E639D753CB75B8293-120940.jpg
(118.1 KB, 800x450, sub05ss01-514170465)
>>>/mlpol/345244 →
>I thought I was an insufferable faggot
<"So, you finally noticed it." (obscure vidya reference meant to be ignored)
Don't get me wrong here >>7029 tho.
What I meant with this:
>an autistic britbong, a bunch of insufferable faggots who can't simply filter the retard
Is that you shouldn't let some autistic nigger ruin the fun. With some anons literally trying to move out of the board. Over ONE shitposter
>I thought I was an insufferable faggot
<"So, you finally noticed it." (obscure vidya reference meant to be ignored)
Don't get me wrong here >>7029 tho.
What I meant with this:
>an autistic britbong, a bunch of insufferable faggots who can't simply filter the retard
Is that you shouldn't let some autistic nigger ruin the fun. With some anons literally trying to move out of the board. Over ONE shitposter
>>7068
>Do (you) have any plan to repair the damage (you) have done?
Frankly, this.
/mlpol/ is unrecognizable now, in a negative way.
F
>Do (you) have any plan to repair the damage (you) have done?
Frankly, this.
/mlpol/ is unrecognizable now, in a negative way.
F
File (): 9492369567F854C9A479974D8826F687-12505.png
(12.2 KB, 819x460, op massive faggot.png)
>>7073
>destroy
>Implying shitposts on /qa/ could destroy /mlpol/
Do you not remember when we used to get raided by /jp/ a dozen times a day for almost a year? That didn't destroy us.
>destroy
>Implying shitposts on /qa/ could destroy /mlpol/
Do you not remember when we used to get raided by /jp/ a dozen times a day for almost a year? That didn't destroy us.
>>7071 The short answer is that I agree with you. I think I got tunnel vision back then because I felt I was in the right and therefore I had to prove it.
I really tire of all the drama that has been. I wanna focus on the positive sides of mlpol and do something creative and productive; I wanna focus on the things we (anons on mlpol) have in common more (I mean we're severely autistic;P). Not new feelings for me perhaps but still.
Btw, I should have informed you and Ninjas a while ago, really sorry about that, but my computer broke and with it, the password for my burner email disappeared. So if you sent me any, that's why I haven't answered them.
I really tire of all the drama that has been. I wanna focus on the positive sides of mlpol and do something creative and productive; I wanna focus on the things we (anons on mlpol) have in common more (I mean we're severely autistic;P). Not new feelings for me perhaps but still.
Btw, I should have informed you and Ninjas a while ago, really sorry about that, but my computer broke and with it, the password for my burner email disappeared. So if you sent me any, that's why I haven't answered them.
File (): B2998126BD7FF207A119E5753223E415-532368.png
(519.9 KB, 842x813, 1575076229643.png)
>>7076
It's alright fam, I don't think it was innapropiate of a response either. And I do appreciate your contributions to the board, glad to have you back.
>>>/mlpol/345270 →
Kek
Am not I wuv U taco anon, but I remember those breads.
Sorry for taking this long for such a low effort reply, there isn't much I can do about it.
It's alright fam, I don't think it was innapropiate of a response either. And I do appreciate your contributions to the board, glad to have you back.
>>>/mlpol/345270 →
Kek
Am not I wuv U taco anon, but I remember those breads.
Sorry for taking this long for such a low effort reply, there isn't much I can do about it.
>>7078
>what exactly does this have to do with the blue board idea?
It was on-topic before, we were doing a lit' wrap up, that's all. Sorry, poner.
>what exactly does this have to do with the blue board idea?
It was on-topic before, we were doing a lit' wrap up, that's all. Sorry, poner.
File (): 9A20CC944568E1124DDA88903DC5CABE-326921.png
(319.3 KB, 3555x2198, 1487110474507.png)
File (): 24DAB2058E85EAD16BC80458AB685A56-94759.png
(92.5 KB, 355x298, pony jockey 2.png)
>>7017
Same faggot here, saging, only dropping by to say that the comments I made on the nohooves reee crowd are all out of date and no longer apply at all, another chance out the window. Say hello to NHNB. wasn't my idea, but the people who care about horse communities outside TT will probably be interested in it, they are advertising on 4chucks sucks and cucks.
>>7023
I already said I dont want you faggots to do anything you don't want to do, theres no point in an idea like this without support of the staff. What I want is for you to take your dick out of your ass and actually read things people are saying instead of just seeth in your own mod drama.
Same faggot here, saging, only dropping by to say that the comments I made on the nohooves reee crowd are all out of date and no longer apply at all, another chance out the window. Say hello to NHNB. wasn't my idea, but the people who care about horse communities outside TT will probably be interested in it, they are advertising on 4chucks sucks and cucks.
>>7023
I already said I dont want you faggots to do anything you don't want to do, theres no point in an idea like this without support of the staff. What I want is for you to take your dick out of your ass and actually read things people are saying instead of just seeth in your own mod drama.
File (): E6EC1E6956538C19B82817D91A4552E7-824010.gif
(804.7 KB, 600x334, ruvdhbcj.gif)
>>7106
Honestly I'm not sure. As is usually the case around here, the consensus seems to be that we have no consensus, so the vote didn't really resolve anything. Since only 16 people bothered to vote and the proposal didn't have enough support to break the 50% threshold, I'm inclined to take this as a resounding "meh" and just leave things the way they are. I guess if anyone wants to make any impassioned arguments to the contrary they are welcome to do so.
>>7107
This seems like as good a suggestion as any.
Honestly I'm not sure. As is usually the case around here, the consensus seems to be that we have no consensus, so the vote didn't really resolve anything. Since only 16 people bothered to vote and the proposal didn't have enough support to break the 50% threshold, I'm inclined to take this as a resounding "meh" and just leave things the way they are. I guess if anyone wants to make any impassioned arguments to the contrary they are welcome to do so.
>>7107
This seems like as good a suggestion as any.
>>7108
Well, I had no strong opinion on it either way, so I guess this is as good of a result as any.
Well, I had no strong opinion on it either way, so I guess this is as good of a result as any.
>>7107
Theres the sort of level-headed response that has driven content and innovation for the site
>>7110
Theres an overrepresentation in and around staff of people who view any change (read: progress) as threatening.
It totally doesnt have anything to do with inherent narcissism though, so stop asking.
Theres the sort of level-headed response that has driven content and innovation for the site
>>7110
Theres an overrepresentation in and around staff of people who view any change (read: progress) as threatening.
It totally doesnt have anything to do with inherent narcissism though, so stop asking.
File (): F271C6C63EC9299131FC97C02B6CE8A8-485186.png
(473.8 KB, 900x853, hermane__saw_by_super_zombie-d4kzias.png)
>>7115
>theres several dead giveaways in that post
The calling to burn OP was mine, I'm not staff but just a single poner looking for OP's pound of flesh.
OP needs to be tested.
>theres several dead giveaways in that post
The calling to burn OP was mine, I'm not staff but just a single poner looking for OP's pound of flesh.
OP needs to be tested.
>>7116
>It was mine
So it was
>I'm not
Taken at face value
>OP needs to be tested
You specifically said burn.
>It was mine
So it was
>I'm not
Taken at face value
>OP needs to be tested
You specifically said burn.
>>7117
OP got the gall of piss many poners offf. I'm an injured party and I want retribution for all the havoc OP and freens did. Wanna change? No way faggots. Take your Blue faggotry to Derpibooru.
OP got the gall of piss many poners offf. I'm an injured party and I want retribution for all the havoc OP and freens did. Wanna change? No way faggots. Take your Blue faggotry to Derpibooru.
File (): 4030C6AF6E0584FC89BA5B600A73FC14-22455.png
(21.9 KB, 700x86, skinning the faggot.png)
>>7116
Dude, I made this thread because the conversation was shitting up my Roe v. Wade thread. Idk why you're so buttfrustrated about it.
The polls are in, and it's already decided that the blue board is a non-starter, so posters can go back to business.
>>7118
>havoc
You're exaggerating.
>I'm an injured party
Cope and seethe, snowflake.
Dude, I made this thread because the conversation was shitting up my Roe v. Wade thread. Idk why you're so buttfrustrated about it.
The polls are in, and it's already decided that the blue board is a non-starter, so posters can go back to business.
>>7118
>havoc
You're exaggerating.
>I'm an injured party
Cope and seethe, snowflake.
[Reply]
[Last 50 Posts]
[Last 100 Posts]
[Last 200 Posts]
You are viewing older replies. Click [View All] or [Last n Posts] to vew latest posts.
Clicking update will load all posts posted after last post on this page.
Post pagination: [Prev] [1-50] [51-100] [101-150] [151-200] [201-250] [251-284] [Next] [Live (last 50 replies)]
284 replies |
136 files |
71 UUIDs |
Page 4