Women helped put Hitler in power and, don't forget, it takes white women to make white babies. Women are reactive and will generally bend to whomever is best suited to lead them. Being a cucked faggot that copes with horse pussy won't stop aliens from fucking your woman because you're too much of a pussy to take control. Inceldom is a sign of weakness and mental illness. You can post pone pussy all day (I love pone, too), but being some sort of virgin incel horse fucker isn't going to stop our genocide. Everyone likes to whine about women, but never takes a step back to look at the pathetic state of white men these days, which is necessary since degeneracy is universal. The first step to fixing a problem is realizing that you have one to begin with.
>>357274 >Women helped put Hitler in power Yeah, but those were times when women were kept in check, now that won't pan out, women's husband are the governments. >don't forget, it takes white women to make white babies Only an idiot would engage with a woman anon. Don't forget that women have a gang called police to back any lie or revenge she is planning. Also the governments expect and demand that men pay for the who know the father is babies, yeah, once a man signs, it is to pay or go to jail. That is unacceptable. Then the only viable solution to form a successful family is to disarm the governments' gangs first to obtain some kind of peaceful coexistence inside home. The traditional balance must be reestablished first.
>>357278 >times when women were kept in check So youre saying weak men created a horrible problem and doomed society by allowing a childish innocent sect of their own race run things instead of themselves?
THE MOST IMPORTANT THING IN THIS WORLD IS YOUR OWN PEOPLE
>>357280 >So youre saying weak men created a horrible problem I do agree with this. >by allowing a childish innocent sect of their own race As long as I know, the ones running the economy, setting cultural patterns and dictating society rules are not European people, but the hebrews and their golems. We have no say in our (?) land. That's an obnoxious fact but a fact nevertheless.
I haven't contributed here much yet, but just wanted to share my observation:
These kinds of threads also pop up on other image boards, and before the original 8chan got shoa'd, there was one poster who posted a lot of screenshots of stenography-protected (to identify leaks) "scripts", ordering the JIDF-type/etc. degenerates which disinfo poisons to spread that day, and what threads to start and conversations to steer and how. The poster also described how these propaganda-farms work, and that the "nigger-hate" threads are usually created by these gov/ngo propagandists.
That doesn't mean that this thread was created by one of these propagandists, and that most of those posting aren't their "colleagues" driving the discussion along, but it's possible. Being an oldfag who's been shitposting on image boards since almost the beginning, I've come to realise over time just how incredibly important it is for these ghouls to keep trying to lower the "level" of discussion and thought on places where genuine ponies, dogs, other animals and humans meet to exchange constructive thoughts and just socialise. I probably have that old thread saved somewhere and can post a screenshot if anyone's interested, might take me a bit to find though.
Personally though, I'm quite fond of pony mares and have never had bad experiences with human women - I'm a pretty big dog, but as long as I hide my human intelligence and act like a big puppy and beg for fetching-games, they'll drop their guard and always give me a quick cuddle or snack, etc. I'm convinced that men and women naturally gravitate towards each other, unite and then together work to defeat any evil and (((actually-toxic))) influence upon family, the survival and health of family and the future of their community/country. All of this fake division and animosity is there to weaken society in order to control (destroy) it and also an acting out of the enemy's hatred towards all that is good, natural and healthy.
I'll be making an effort to try and contribute in these more old-fashioned original down-to-earth, genuine and life/liberty/pony-affirming ways. Have sum Applebutt. :3
>>357288 >That doesn't mean that this thread was created by one of these propagandists I'm guilty on posting the thread, but innocent about nefarious intentions. Sorry if I ruffled some manes.
>>357289 Maybe I've gotten too allergic/sensitive over the years, but it's a big problem that's killed many good boards. This smorgasbord of fine marepussy however is TRULY worth looking after and preserving for the ages.
It's always so lame. Woman are innocent and can't be held responsible, if a woman leaves you it's your fault as the man etc. If you criticize their behavoir it's because you're a virgin!!! and that this criticism creates a divide between men and woman.
One can have two thoughts in one's head at the same time. Yes, we need woman to procreate so one should not give up on that, however, that doesn't mean woman aren't promicious today nor that woman aren't sycophants that just agree with consensus.
I know that this a coping mechanism because men prefer their romanatcized version of a pure woman instead, and sure there probably exist woman like that but you know this doesn't remove the other ones.
>>357288 >>357289 >>357292 I can confirm that this thread was posted by a regular user and not a visiting propagandist.
Honestly this thread was kind of borderline, I was considering just deleting it when I saw it, but we usually leave these kinds of threads alone if they actually start generating meaningful discussion. However there's also kind of a thin line between not censoring but also trying to maintain a basic level of quality, and threads like "fuck wammen" and "fuck naggers" and so forth tend to be pretty low-brow.
I would say maybe just try to keep in mind that this isn't 4chan and threads here have a much longer lifespan. An active thread on /pol/ lasts maybe an hour tops, and an inactive thread is usually off the board in 5-10 minutes. The occasional low-quality thread would be fine if we had that kind of speed. However, threads here tend to be up for a long time; even completely inactive threads usually take a few weeks to drop out of the catalog. So bear in mind that anything you post is probably going to be with us for quite some time. The occasional shitpost is fine, but if you want to start a serious thread it's usually worth it to put a little bit of work into the OP post.
>>357288 >places where genuine ponies, dogs, other animals and humans meet because that shit is totally not a degen jewish psyop to turn you sterile and dead
>>357297 I see. In that case I've got some interesting things to post for OP to look at, but other pony stallions as well who are under the influence of zionism and its many poisons (such as feminism) - maybe will post pics on that particular poison/virus later.
PS: The "Are Women People" thing is zionist doublespeak and a trap; may comment on that later as well.
OP, you have a lot of work ahead of you but it's worth it, and you're on a pretty based image board as well.
>>357350 >Additional related wisdom... And a bit of reality. If you want pussy, make sure to get it overseas and don't bring it here to get spoiled by the jews.
>>357374 I get the sentiment, but marrying overseas just guarantees that you'll get some morally destitute, third world whore that betrayed her own people and will inevitably do the same to you once she gets a green card. Especially true for white incels that marry crazy Asian whores and progenate dysgenic hapa freaks.
>>357351 Idk, but it doesn't seem like a post that compares woman to animals really doesn't contradict an OP that asks if woman are human, but w/e. >>357374 Kinda what I talked about right here. Did OP even say something like he wanted pussy or are you just projecting so hard you could be used in presentations?
>Nick Fuentes on women Say what you wish on this closeted homo, but he is right. Nothing will change until women return to have a designated tutor, be the father, be the husband; as it was in the Christian 1200/1500s.
>>357714 >>357764 Maybe I'm just having a moment where I'm in a strange state of mind, but it just seems so baffling that there is a large demographic that is so consistently less competent and attentive in what they're doing. Further, they're constantly bailed out by the adults around them fixing their mistakes and helping them.
It's like the first world civilization around them has turned into a population of tard wranglers and the tards we protect and help (women) and the tards that have to grow and learn how life works or they'll suffer (men).
>>357808 >it just seems so baffling that there is a large demographic that is so consistently less competent and attentive in what they're doing. Women are like children, or at best, the most responsible teenager in the room. They need a tutor.
Funny stuff is going on and it needs talked about. I didn't want to kill a thread so I'm posting on this. Obviously 4cuck is compromised. Frens is faggots. Mlpol are the only true based independent national socialist board. Take a look at this screen shot and tell me wtf?
>>358297 Why do people save or post these kinds of videos? it's likely edited with random text like any other exploitable image. Saving it because you like what it says is akin to saving cuck porn.
>>358428 >Why do people save or post these kinds of videos? The post >>358297 has a point IMO, most White women had committed the ultimate betrayal against everything holy and pure. - killing the unborn - abuse and hatred against men, specially White men - race mixing - applauding every policy promoting White genocide - supporting the dispossession of their own people - embracing perversion and celebrating it - ..........
Granted they are needed for the perpetuation of the race, but their career wrecking our civilization and their destructive freewill must end once and for all. It is for their own good and ours.
>>358452 >get very close to "how can white men possibly compete?" sort of stuff Noted. On the other hoof the fact that western women are damaged goods cannot be denied. If reproduction is your concern, then any sane man should accomplish that task outside western zog jurisdiction. A whore cannot have a legal say on how to guide a family.
>>358454 >A whore cannot have a legal say on how to guide a family. This is very close to the optimal idea. And I am saying this as a bastard son from a disfunctional family.
>>358455 If mental health professionals were worth a damn they would encourage people to strive towards peak physical and mental health and help them get there. They would tell women in failing marriages when, in their professional opinion, it is her fault. They would tell women to breed fast before they go dry. And prescribe drugs to help women love their kids and husband. If the justice industry was worth a damn, a man could sue her and her divorce lawyer if they misrepresent anything about him.
>>357253 >Are women people? Yes >99% of them are just low IQ beings roaming society while trying to leech somebody, be a dude, be the government. Problems which only happen because people allowed welfare to exist.
>>357288 Majority of the problem I see with these kinds of discussions is that the begin on the faulty premise that taking away "women's rights" is going to solve "all" of societies woes, without looking at the very simple fact that it was "white educated men" who gave women and niggers their "rights" in the first place, AND that majority of the problems proceeded those acts of abolition. If anything, I see these types of discussions more as red herrings that try to avoid talking about the real issues, such as how majority of modern society's problems stems from the very simple fact people have been "raised" on the idea that Socialism is good for them, meanwhile all of the problems that exist is because sociey is enacting Socialist laws and practices.
Women always need a man. The female gender is lost without the guidance of a man. If women are left to develop society and family, it will tend towards degeneracy or decline in most cases in average economic scenarios. Women are the physically weaker sex, often the mentally and spiritually weaker sex, therefore they are technically inferior to men or the male gender/race (men and women should be separate races, as well as genders, in post-modern society and politics, seeing how their biology differs so).
Because women are constantly inferior, they must rely on the Government, like a welfare monkey, to protect themselves. Unlike men who tend to be more independent in terms of management and conflict resolution, women will often or always give-in to third parties, inviting unnecessary and uncalled for elements because the woman is foolish or easily fooled.
Women cope in the attempts to humiliate the male gender/race like a little child attempts to humiliate their parents. She will whine, she will bitch, she will complain, she will holler, she will hoot, she will be an absolute animal, or child, requiring your discipline until the bitch shuts the fuck up.
Women are a threat, a weakness in the human race. Their desire to humiliate and hurt the male gender will cause the downfall and destruction of the human race. Women are never satisfied. Once the next species or alien lands with a slightly larger penis than any human male, its over for the human race, through the most materialistic (or slutty) females that will choose to procreate with extraterrestrial aliens on the basis of genital size. This is the reality of the female gender.
The female race/gender is endlessly and forever butthurt like a bitch at the way men have treated their gender, from witch burnings to primae noctis, from temple prostitutes to beating up hookers, women will never be satisfied in whats owed to them, because women themselves believe that the only fair or just revenge in all of this of course is, the endless torture and suffering of men or the male gender. Her current conspiracy is to use her vagina-yin power to suck the life-force out of men from remote safety, as an invisible voice in the head of the male gender, constantly shouting verbal abuse in revenge against the male race, in hopes to garner his energy or steal it, after all, it is a woman, and it is a pussy.
All men should have the right to harem, and every man has a right to carry out MK ultra training on female members of their family.
>>357288 I'd love to see the leaks / screencaps of this thread. Events like that are literally historical, so I'm also trying to save a copy of the thread as best I can for archival, since the main archive sites obviously present a clear centralized set of targets for malicious forces.
>Being an oldfag who's been shitposting on image boards since almost the beginning, I've come to realise over time just how incredibly important it is for these ghouls to keep trying to lower the "level" of discussion and thought on places where genuine ponies, dogs, other animals and humans meet to exchange constructive thoughts and just socialise. This, I feel, is an incredibly major point. While I believe that there should be space for basically all relevant kinds of discussion in a given community including negative ones, artificially inflating the negative tone of the cultural zeitgeist is going to have massive impact on the general wellbeing of the group. Just think of how many people take the percieved predominant views and opinions of society around them as their starting point in their reasoning process. Or notice some of that in your own life. It actually gets a bit uncomfortable to realize it and notice those thought patterns.
Anyway, this clearly goes back to the Emotion (Rhetoric) vs Logic conflict that's been going on at least since ancient Greek times. They're using a tool for control that has no restraints on it, and they're using it for evil and destructive ends.
Most people are eventually vulnerable to having their opinions and thoughts changes by emotional arguments, even if they're not true. They should instead base their thought processes on logic, which at least tries to adhere to reality, thereby stopping things from getting too dysfunctional over time again.
- That was probably a bit rambly, so I'll wrap this up with some classic 2015-ish feminism memes.
>>359821 >artificially inflating the negative tone of the cultural zeitgeist is going to have massive impact on the general wellbeing of the group Yeah, but ignoring the sorry state of women and their responsibility on White race's undoing cannot be overstated. Modern women are a real heavy liability for any man.
>>357253 You don't expect a drugged person to act as a person at all times do you? Women are encouraged to be drugged by chemical contraceptives. The ones specifically in use reduce oxycontin, which is responsible for love, family, in group preference, motherhood and caretaking. Not to mention all the other crap. Needless to say if half the population just lacks that emotional chemical guess what the brain is doing? Freaking the fuck out. The next nearest chemical to oxycontin is dopamine and that's ham fisting it. It won't every fill that void the physiology knows it but the person drugged is running on altered perceptions. Is it a shock when some mentally crinkle? When afterwards the proposed solution is even more medication? I'm not saying women are blameless, but I am saying the full picture is needed to be had. Let me back track a moment. They did a study that participants dosed with oxytocin when viewing pictures are more likely to view them with deep love and affection like family. This study was to encourage taking in of dune 'migrants'. Surprise surprise. Well not really because it's been floating around for a long while. So how do (((they))) use the poison to further distabilize a country? Enable the mind fucked to have total success in family courts. Where they can't love as they ought to because of the mind altering stuff. Which leads to single parent households, which leads to criminals getting criminal behavior. Not to mention out group bias due to the lack of needed brain chemicals which leads to engaging with more risky behaviors and people. That's a large fucking chunk of the population. Few people know or understand or even want to acknowledge this because pill good. You go gurl. Information to prevent new cases from happening is needed. The truth will set you free. Outgroup preference also applies to non-human things such as business and governments.
>>360192 Anon you don't seem to know how bad things really are. Women dressing up like that in your picture are a first sign of decadence. A Women who cares to much about her looks » Tight clothing, lavish hairstyle etc. It's a sign of lacking character, a sign of degeneracy.
See my pic. for a more accurate depiction of good females.
>>360210 Kinda accurate. Women should really only show off their bodis to their husbands in private, rather than seeking to subtly flirt with other men in public while later acting shocked that men could be so boorish.
>>360448 I also like trashy women. I have terribly low self esteem and I find the dumpster dived trashy bitches to be obtainable, thus more attractive. I'm particularly fond of 80's/90's sluts with big hair. Before women got fatter and browner. Did anyone ever not want to fuck Kelly Bundy?
>What the Burka Means to Me >Young women in the West are naive to think sex appeal is the only thing that matters to men. Men seek intelligence, character, personality, purity, talent, dignity, modesty and refinement in a permanent mate. Act like a whore and be treated like one. https://henrymakow.com/180902.html
>ANN COULTER: Transgender Nation—Are White Liberal Women To Blame? >In a form of modern Lysenkoism, young transgenders overwhelmingly come from homes with signs that say: “In This House, We Believe: Black Lives Matter, Women’s Rights Are Human Rights, No Human Is Illegal, Science Is Real, Love Is Love, Kindness Is Everything.” >Specifically, a study of adolescent and young adult transgenders found that the adults in the home who identify as “parents” were 91.4% white; 70.9% had a bachelor’s degree or higher and 85.9% favored gay marriage. Parent respondents were 91.7% female. https://vdare.com/articles/ann-coulter-transgender-nation-are-white-liberal-women-to-blame
>Married Texas 911 dispatcher suspended for allegedly sexting 7 officers >A Texas police dispatcher has been suspended after her husband caught her sexting seven officers, including two with whom she was having affairs — and her boss is investigating whether some of the hanky-panky occurred on duty. >Krystle Perez, 38, an overnight dispatcher at the Bexar County Sheriff’s Office in San Antonio, was placed on unpaid leave after her husband, Giancarlo Perez, discovered steamy messages on her cellphone, KABB reported Thursday. >Along with Perez, Sgt. Renaldo Salinas and Deputy Juan Leal — who also have been suspended — face possible termination over the scandal, according to the outlet. https://nypost.com/2023/04/10/married-texas-911-dispatcher-suspended-for-allegedly-sexting-7-cops/
>>361431 Is it worse to have no children or to have mutts with a brown slut? Asking for a friend surrounded by easy Mexican women where White women are inaccessible aside from toothless crackheads. I mean, I'm racist, but they're everywhere and so easy.
>>361433 That whore's eyes don't look mexican, but yes, she is mutt like her husband. By the way, the husband is wearing a shirt of the Argentina's soccer team, so most likely they are another invaders usurping jobs in the government.
>>361435 >That whore's eyes don't look mexican Believe me, they do. Almost all Mexicans are mutts, except for the dark skinned minority from Southern Mexico. Ones from Northern Mexico generally have a significant European admixture. >the husband is wearing a shirt of the Argentina's soccer team Makes sense since Argentinians are probably the biggest faggots in Latin America. Explains why he's a cuck.
Anyway, I ask because my friend has only slept with Mexican women because White women are unavailable in his area except for complete garbage fires. Is having "white-passing" mutts worse than having no children or having children with a toothless crackwhore? Will I go to horsefucker Hell for putting my meat in the tortillas of Mexican bitches? I promise that if my kids were like Nick Fuentes, I'd have them retroactively aborted, I swear.
>>361433 >Is it worse to have no children or to have mutts with a brown slut? Asking for a friend surrounded by easy Mexican women where White women are inaccessible aside from toothless crackheads. I mean, I'm racist, but they're everywhere and so easy. I ask myself this question everyday., its the question of our times, it would depend o how old you are really, if you're old like 30 or something, maybe go for the spic whores, i would look down on you like i do other race mixers though. T.Incel
>>361437 >Makes sense since Argentinians are probably the biggest faggots in Latin America. Explains why he's a cuck. I agree. To my knowledge, they are the biggest liberals supporting feminism. Pathetic.
>>361438 Can I still be based if I've only had sex with Latinas? I've never had sex with a white woman, but I've slept with four Mexican women over the years through sheer happenstance. Will /mlpol/ bully me? I don't seek them out or anything - it just happens. Must be part Spanish because I somehow managed to drunkenly stumble backwards into the vaginas of Latinas without even trying. I don't seek it out, but I take it when it's available. I'm a total dork and even I get have gotten laid. Move to Texas, get a job and a vehicle, and don't be hideously deformed. You won't be an incel around Mexican sluts. Just be warned that White women are wholly unaccessible unless you're wealthy, "educated" and know the right people. Unless you want the female equivalent of Ethan Ralph. Not advocating race mixing, just being honest. I'm mid 20's and must get my shit together and have kids before I get too old. If that means settling for a mestiza, then so be it.
>>361444 >I'm mid 20's and must get my shit together and have kids before I get too old. If that means settling for a mestiza, then so be it. TBH, you sound like trolling. Tainting your blood is the worst sin. And for what? Because you couldn't keep your dick in check?
>>361444 >Just be warned that White women are wholly unaccessible unless you're wealthy, "educated" and know the right people. By the way, seriously. If you indeed want children, then I would suggest to stay as far as possible from these western "White Women", they are totally lost and are the equivalent of psychopathic demons. Get your shit together and rent a surrogate, then you won't have to share custody with any whore.
>>361445 >TBH, you sound like trolling. I'm being half serious. It's true that I've exclusively slept with Mexican women and have never had access to the elusive White women. I wanted to frame it in a way that wouldn't be met with outright derision by anons here because I'm genuinely curious if anons thinks it's worse to either have children with a degenerate White woman, no children, or knocking up a Latina. It's, like, Schrodinger's b8.
I want to be a father someday, but the odds that I'll be able to have that kind of relationship with a White woman that isn't a total piece of shit gets lower every year. I've had multiple relationships with Mexican chicks before I started shutting myself in and I wonder if I blew my chance at life by pissing away my past relationships. >Tainting your blood is the worst sin. Worse than being an incel retard that will never procreate and whose legacy will be seething on the Internet? I mean having half Mexican that are mostly White would be better than none, right? Plus, half Mexican and White kids aren't plagued by the mental illnesses that hapa abominations have. >Because you couldn't keep your dick in check? At the time, yes. Now it's more of a "grow up and have a normal family while you can" sort of thing.
>>361444 >I'm mid 20's and must get my shit together and have kids before I get too old. If that means settling for a mestiza, then so be it. Idk Man before I'd settle for some mexican bitch that would give me half breed kids, I'd consider moving somewhere else in Texas, i live close by in a neighboring state. maybe even considering to one of those. but that's just me though. >Just be warned that White women are wholly unaccessible unless you're wealthy, "educated" and know the right people. Unless you want the female equivalent of Ethan Ralph. That's rough man i feel bad for you. >you want the female equivalent of Ethan Ralph
>>361899 >Shit like this genuinely makes me sad Don't be, they have what they saw. Women are unfit to take family decisions and are the first to expel the husband as soon as a new source of incoming, and with minimal strings attached, is available, for example the government. This is the rule, not the exception.
>>361899 >she wasted her youth whoring around and is now old and alone, I can relate to that in a way except I'm male and in my mid twenties Shut up, slut. You chose to whore around and now you're having a quarter life crisis lol. No mare would ever want such a promiscuous man.
>>361899 These women have been fucking niggers and douchebags for decades. No regular man can fit the criminal profile that make them wet and therefore any man falling for their lies is fucked. Old damaged women like this one soon will switch target after the stupid decent guy's money while cuck him at every opportunity they have. Modern women already tasted chad and because of that, they don't tolerate the regular guy, even worst, they hate men and are more than willing to cheat, lie, and hurt them as a revenge for not having the attention of chad. Yup, women are that psycho.
I want to see if any of you can find the evidence navigating just from the homepage. I happen to know the keywords to search to find some of the worst articles that make it abundantly clear.
At face value it seems real and most NPCs will treat it as such.
I’m Proved Right (Again): New Study Shows Women Threaten University Ideal >Almost four years ago, I looked at the problem of women in universities under the helpful heading Are Women Destroying Academia? Probably. This caused an international uproar when Professor Eric Rasmusen of the University of Indiana tweeted my article. https://vdare.com/articles/i-m-proved-right-again-new-study-shows-women-threaten-university-ideal https://twitter.com/erasmuse/status/1192591814567563266 ---- >Are Women Destroying Academia? Probably >Perhaps we need separate universities for males and females. They could socialize on campus, but they shouldn’t be the same seminars or even academic departments. Of course, this was actually the case in the nineteenth century, with Harvard and Radcliffe and Columbia and Barnard College. >This divide is currently enforced—without the socializing—in some Islamic countries. >Could it be that, even when it comes to academia, “Islam is right about women”? https://vdare.com/articles/are-women-destroying-academia-probably
>>362970 >then why are you cockblocking the shitposting? Yeah, specially on a very low traffic site. A have got some ideas, or either >>362969 is a woman, or a pathetic simp, or a commie infiltrator looking to discourage posting.
>>362970 >shitposting I'm glad our Women's suffering is funny to you. kike. >>362979 >He cares about the Women of his race's wellbeing he must be a simp blow your brains out retard.
>>362997 >I'm more redoilled Yes, you have to be, whatever that means. On the other hoof, your bluepill mindset is showing. Go ahead, save as many whores as you can. I'm sure they will open their legs for you. /s
>>363006 Well, if you think about it, anon is being realistic. Most are sons of manipulative women who targeted men with some money. Pregnancy is usually the method to extract those resources.
>>363007 Not mine. You know for people who claim to be based, you all seem to have problems with your mothers, a mirror image of the women you like to criticize for "Fatherless Behavior"
>>363008 >You know for people who claim to be based, you all seem to have problems with your mothers >Assuming everyone on /mlpol/ agrees with this thread because it gets bumped I hate the antinatalistic incel/misogynist shit, but I normally just sage. It's probably just a single butthurt anon that keeps this thread moving at all.
>>363006 By your own admission, you're the son(?) of a whore. As such, your opinion is disregardible, by your own position. Congratulations, you have played yourself. >>363018 Thanks for reminding to sage
>>363018 >incel/misgynist You forgot racists, facists, bigots in your substanceless slurs. >>363020 >As such, your opinion is disregardible, by your own position. > by your own position. How by his own position? Did you read something I didn't?
>White women Guess what? I have an expression: "The best thing about black people is that you appriciate white people more." I don't put my own people on a pedstal. We are kinda shit. But It's my race and I can't live without them anyway. Ontop of that, we're better than niggers and the like.
But I don't have to sit here and pretend as if the majority of white people are somekind of saints and shit. Fuck that.
>>363028 Sure but my point remains. Waving around whiteness as a shield to say that we can't criticise them does not convince me of us being in the wrong in this thread.
On that note, >this entire thread reeks of Unironic faggotry so all the posts here are untrue then? Good to know. This is why I'm being a bit harsh because you went out so hard yourself.
>>363232 You won't get it. It's an anti-White meme repeated by the retarded fans of CommonFilth. It spawned from incels assuming that if White women aren't fucking them, then they must be fucking dogs. Total subhuman 'humor'.
>>363240 >It spawned from incels assuming that if White women aren't fucking them, then they must be fucking dogs. And here I thought it was a joke and no one believed that woman are actually fucking dogs. Who knew? You learn something new everyday.
>>363242 >And here I thought it was a joke and no one believed that woman are actually fucking dogs. Who knew? >passive aggression Being a snarky sperg here won't stop shitskins from fucking your women. Sorry if I insulted your e-daddy.
>>363242 Look, I know that you know this. You're just being annoying and pretending otherwise. You just have problem with this thread in general.
You seem, to me but you can tell me if I'm off, to be under the impression that we need them to survive. In a way you are completly right but you are wrong about how. Yes, do continue as a group we need woman to give birth to our children but does that mean we should appeal to them? Should we lie and say there's nothing to criticize about them as a biological collective?
The truth is that don't need to do any of this. Woman go to the men that seem the powerful and leave the weak. Meaning: If we're weak but appeal to woman's sensiblities, they won't come anyway. The reverse is true as well. If we're powerful, they will come even if we publicly speak ill about them.
Also, if we're going to have genuine relationships with woman, then one has to start with being honest with each other. Already there you can see the hypocrisy in our world. Woman can berate men to such a extreme degree today and end up being praised media for it. While if you state anything negative about one specific woman's merits, people will suspect you of sexism!!!
This thread is good because we men can get out our feelings and also share our perspective on the matter.
That's why I kinda dislike your behavior. You see this thread and only want to destroy it. Are there things in this thread that I disagree with, yes, but that's true for every thread. Why do you have a problem with a thread that offers space for men to discuss their issues with the biological collective known as woman?
>>363243 I don't follow, sorry. Can you elaborate?
>>363240 >It spawned from incels assuming that if White women aren't fucking them, then they must be fucking dogs. Well, let me redpill you anon, White women, I don't know others, have a knack for sexual favors from dogs, this is not slander but an actual pattern. I know this first hand and was not an isolated incident.
>>363248 The meme started unironically from CF fags. Just because Mary Sue would rather be spending time with her pets than with some hideous sperg doesn't mean that she's fucking the dog. I could, hypothetically, cherry pick instances of whales shitting bricks of gold. Doesn't make it a phenomenon. The whole anti-woman thing is just just another load of shit meant to demoralize Whites. Congrats on falling for it. It's kinda funny seeing the "White women fuck dogs" meme on a site that tolerates zoophiles lol. I guess White men (wish they could) fuck horses.
>>363251 >The whole anti-woman thing is just just another load of shit meant to demoralize Whites. Congrats on falling for it. It is not a rumor, it is not a meme, as anon said above >>363248 , it is a pattern. >anti-woman KYS Are you blind and brain damaged? Feminism, which is 100% anti-man, is embraced by 99.9% of women.
>>363252 >Are you blind and brain damaged? Feminism, which is 100% anti-man, is embraced by 99.9% of women. So, is your plan to save the White race being an incel shut-in that will never procreate? I don't disagree that most women are degenerates, but so are the overwhelming majority of men. Did you ever think to take a step back and ask yourself why things are as bad as they are? White women gravitate towards deleterious behavior because White men have collectively failed to do their part and ignoring a problem doesn't fix it. It takes two to tango, after all. You and those like you could be part of the solution by improving yourselves and being the change that you want to see, but you instead choose to seethe and moan while rejecting any responsibility... Like niggers. Incels being non-reproductive retards doesn't even bother me, it's that you types feel the need to spew your divisive and ultimately anti-White nonsense to others. Profligacy knows no particular race or sex and all those who participate in such bullshit are all guilty. Assuming otherwise is foolish and is exactly what led us to the shitty state that our society is currently in. Again, this misogynist retardation is counterproductive. Uh-oh, I said "misogynist," be sure to seethe about that, too.
>>363289 >So, is your plan to save the White race being an incel shut-in that will never procreate? >Incels being non-reproductive retards doesn't even bother me, it's that you types feel the need to spew your divisive and ultimately anti-White nonsense to others. Sounds like your projecting pretty hard. My closest friend refers to woman as sluts but his woman is pregnant. Anyway, using big words like "deleterious" and "Profligacy" or maybe I'm just a dumb dumb ^^ won't mask the fact that a lot of this post is using shame-tactics to make us shut up about our criticism towards woman, not so much substance on where we're wrong. In fact:
>I don't disagree that most women are degenerates Are we in agrement? >White women gravitate towards deleterious behavior because White men have collectively failed to do their part and ignoring a problem doesn't fix it. Okay, but if this thread is just wrong about everything it says about woman, then why would we need to take responsiblity for anything? We only need to take responsibility if woman are not are equals and if our points of criticism stands about them.
>You and those like you could be part of the solution by improving yourselves and being the change that you want to see, but you instead choose to seethe and moan while rejecting any responsibility... Like niggers. Don't know really were this comes from. I haven't advocate for giving up or anything, I just have low opinion on woman. I would even go so far to say that having low opinion of woman is being redpilled and by extension taking responsiblity by having a none-romanticist view on woman.
>Again, this misogynist retardation is counterproductive. Uh-oh, I said "misogynist," be sure to seethe about that, too. Yes, I will "seethe" about it because you called us niggers with one hand and then judge us for being sexist with the other, without irony.
>>363293 Also, I want to criticise on this responsiblity talk for a bit. I will keep it short because I'm not in the mood to write down my whole rant about this.
This is not only you who have mentioned how men need to take responsiblity and stuff but I would argue that this is downright harmful.
I think there's a meme somewhere about how female self-help is: "You deserve this and that and this." While men self-help is: "You need to do this and that and this."
I think this is the reason for why so many commit suicide. The standrads for men are set so fucking high that men cannot reach them and thusly feel guilty about it. Men basically value themselves based on their level of production and a form of external validation based on that production.
It's always something that men needs to do. Compared to woman who can just exist and things will just come to them, men always have to prove themselves. Their value exist in what they can do, not in what they are.
While striving in desperation for these crazy ideals to get something, like sex or a gf, they might end up breaking.
The truth is that sex is just like water in that it's a thirst people need to sleek to survive. While you can survive without sex, mentally you take a blow. This is also why our currently none arranged marriage system doesn't work.
Men deserve much more and it's through this realization, you can find peace in all this chaos. It's not you who are wrong, it's the world.
Men needs to find value in themselves and not listen to the endless barrage of hate they get from every direction in our society.
>>363293 >Sounds like your projecting pretty hard. Yeah, I love women so much that I won't even fuck them and have kids. You're a smart one, based incel. You should get a psychology degree, Dr. Freud. > My closest friend refers to woman as sluts Lol not really relevant, but that says almost as much about you as it does him. I guess his wife is a whore and his daughters will be, too. That's some good company that you keep. Disgusting. >Anyway, using big words like "deleterious" and "Profligacy" or maybe I'm just a dumb dumb ^^ won't mask the fact that a lot of this post is using shame-tactics to make us shut up I'm sorry if my big words offended you. By the way, being a bitter sexual and social failure is something to be ashamed of. Talk about projection. >inb4 muh projection Only total rejects hold the views you espouse. That's obvious to anyone that isn't a hermit. >Are we in agrement? Not really. I think one of the main reasons why White women are so fucked is because faggy White men are too spineless to do what's right. Society never would've degenerated to this point if good men hadn't remained idle as our values were eroded. I could easily make a thread calling White men worthless because of cuckoldry/trannies/pedophilia/whatever if I really wanted to play devil's advocate, but that would be just as wrong for the same reasons. >Okay, but if this thread is just wrong about everything it says about woman I never said it was. I'm not trawling through a sea of lazily spammed boomer memes to realize that incel spergs are incel spergs, so I'm not going to pretend to understand the specific motives of every anon that has posted here. It all has the same outcome, anyway. I said that it's an incel therapy thread that's ultimately anti-White. Prove me wrong. >why would we need to take responsiblity for anything? Your type whine that women are dumb commie whores who won't fuck them. Have you ever thought that maybe it's because some guys are not exactly a prize specimens? Women are reactionary. 'Nuff said. >We only need to take responsibility if woman are not are equals and if our points of criticism stands about them. Complete and total ass-pull. Men and women are not isolated from one another. You sound horrifically demoralized. Whether women are "equals" by whatever gay metric you want to use is irrelevant. It could easily be said that any White woman that pumps out decent Aryan babies is vastly more valuable as a human being than some random nerd on the Internet. Would you consider yourself superior to a White woman that has born many children? >I haven't advocate for giving up or anything, You personally may have not done so, but this sort of rhetoric usually only leads one way and it's not some 'based' Stepford Wives fantasy or whatever. >I will "seethe" about it because you called us niggers with one hand and then judge us for being sexist with the other, without irony. And? How am I wrong for doing so?
You obviously have harsh opinions about women that I find to be self-defeating. Please, just ask yourself why you feel that way and contemplate about it... And be honest with yourself. You could be right or you could be wrong, but I'll hold out hope that you'll outgrow whatever this is. I genuinely hope you find a woman, fall in love, and have family. Hopefully you'll look back on this with shame.
>>359821 >I'd love to see the leaks / screencaps of this thread. I hadn't seen your reply until today. Losing 8chan and 16chan was a terrible loss. I had only picked out a handful of things from the threads before the boards were shoa'd. :( Anyway, don't want to focus on the negative, especially as that's what the enemy wants. I'm 95% certain that this is the mentioned thread (there might have been another thread elsewhere too) - it was heavily under attack by (((satan's allies))), so there's a lot of bot/NPC posts: https://anonfiles.com/naI0wct5z4/based8chin_7z Pass is: MareButtBestButt
>>363295 Yeah, maybe I used the word, "projection" wrong btw. What I meant was that you assume a bunch of stuff of the Anons here. So in my mind you projected your own ideas of us onto us sort of thing. But whatever, as I said, I'll get back to this.
Before I post this, I want to set the record straight. I'm not this guy: >>363252 that you were answering to if you thought so, I'm another guy. I just replied to your post on my own volition.
>>363295 >but that says almost as much about you as it does him. I guess his wife is a whore and his daughters will be, too. That's some good company that you keep. Disgusting. Well, I don't think of woman as whores, and I don't think he does either, really, but I can agree with his underlining sentiment. Basically, female sexuality is to give their bodies to men in exchange for protection and care, essentially selling their bodies for power. I don't actually judge woman for this. Men's sexuality is to impregnate as many woman as possible and the ones with the best genetics for birthing and breastfeeding gets priority. One could argue that both these things are both ugly and good but I choose to just see it as an amoral sort of thing, it just is. >By the way, being a bitter sexual and social failure is something to be ashamed of. Not sure if I'm following but it's fine. I'll just interpret what you say here and you will just have to correct me if I'm wrong. > a bitter sexual I assume that's someone who hasn't had sex and blames everyone else for it. I mean feel like there are two sides to it. Yes, most of the time men who are single have options out there and they could make a greater effort into finding them. Tho, on that note. People have a tendency to make it out as if they don't make an effort when you know that they do. But sure, you can always do more and there a plenty of fish in the ocean and so on. On the other side, woman have high standrads for their men today (well, they always had but...). But I think I'll get back to that later. But basically men have it significantly harder than woman. Don't see why you would be ashamed tho. If people don't consent to you, there's nothing you can do. Ultimately, it's up to a woman to want to have sex with you so you can go through a whole life virgin at no fault of your own. Not saying that's what happens, we're human afterall, just using an extreme example to make a point. > social failure I thought this post was very enlightening: >>363257 → But in my own words, I'd say that I don't believe that anyone who is here has not been a social failure in their lives. The truth is that we can barely admit our thoughts and feelings to ourselves, much less to other people. Being social is in a lot of ways like lying. People are not themselves when they are with other people and they don't tell them the whole truth of how they really feel about things if at all. They don't talk about the things that's actually on their minds. It's sometimes unwarranted but not always. Telling my parents about my nationalistic leanings did not go over well. My father was more cool-headed about it than my mother, tho he didn't like it either. From my perspective, spending time alone thinking about things is how you develop thoughts on your own instead of being drown by peer pressure into thinking like everybody else. I don't thinkg there's anything to be ashamed of here. The world is wrong about almost everything so why assume that having a big social network is the same as success. If this is not what you mean with social, then I sadly misunderstand. I have small social circle, not because I couldn't do with more friends mind you, but because I can be honest with these people to another degree that I can with just an aquiantance. Although, such relationships are nothing to sneeze at either. >I could easily make a thread calling White men worthless because of cuckoldry/trannies/pedophilia/whatever if I really wanted to play devil's advocate, but that would be just as wrong for the same reasons. I feel like we sort of have those threads tho. We have the ugly mugshot of anti-fa folks, the tranny hate thread, and people on the alt-right's favourite insult is to call people cucks. ”Reee normies get off my board!” is also kinda of telling of what we think of the average white man. Sure, we don't have a anti-white man thread but men aren't as deleterious as woman are. Especially, considering there are people who will call you names for offering a different opinion about stuff, like you might be called a sexist and proceeded to be shamed by a person for that.
>>363318 >it's that you types feel the need to spew your divisive and ultimately anti-White nonsense to others. Well ackshully. Last time I checked on r9k, it was filled with spam and other normie trash thread. I suppose that makes sense to some degree conisdering the board's theme, still felt off tho. Pretty sure I saw a meme about how the place was invaded once. The incel culture that was once there isn't really there anymore, it seems. Honestly, I thought it might be a good place to fish for the board since they might feel like they lack one now. What I'm saying might be wrong tho since I have had a very limited amount of time with that board. But besides that, people will obviously spread what they believe in so it's not unexpected.
>I said that it's an incel therapy thread that's ultimately anti-White. Prove me wrong. No. You're making the claim, you have to prove it. That's how thiat works. Why should I disprove every random statement you throw at me?
>Have you ever thought that maybe it's because some guys are not exactly a prize specimens? >Women are reactionary. 'Nuff said. Exactly my dude. Exactly. Woman are ruled by hypergamy because when they get pregnat they will have to stick with that kid for at least nine months so they have to be selective. Meaning, there will be a few men that get most of the woman. Couldn't have said it better myself.
>Would you consider yourself superior to a White woman that has born many children? This paragraph that I picked this sentence from imakes me think that we're not on the same page. But onto the question: Unless my impact as a political enlightent person grows. I would say that she's the one more useful for the aryan race's continuation but this is kinda my point. Woman are privliged for what they are. ”Woman and children first off the ship” kinda thing is a kinda of a through-line through the ages, I can imagine. But if we're talking about equal rights, then men should have more rights than woman. I don't really believe in rights as a concept but if I did, I wouldn't want them to be equal. Anyway, the reason I brought equality is becasue I kinda associate the words misogynist and equality with each other.
>And? How am I wrong for doing so? Yeah, I feel like it's obvious ”how” and that you're just being a contrarian because you're angery at me or prideful or something. However, we could just not be on the same page. But couldn't you just as easily make the same arguements for why niggers dindu nuffin as you make for women and how it's actually white men's fault for letting this happend in the first place? But besides that, you judge blacks (a biological collective) for their genetics but you think it's wrong to judge woman (another biological collective). So you're a racist but not a sexist, I guess.
>Please, just ask yourself why you feel that way and contemplate about it... And be honest with yourself. I actually did. I took a moment for your sake and went through why I felt the way I felt. What I came up with was that, while I haven't been perfect in my life, it really wasn't so much about me. Some was but most of it just comes from my conviction in my beliefs because they seem true.
>but I'll hold out hope that you'll outgrow whatever this is. >Hopefully you'll look back on this with shame. That's sort a paraphrase of what people told me about my nationalistic convictions too.
But I don't feel like being personal man. I don't feel like this is really about me despite you, seemingly pushing our conversation there. I just believe in the things I do because they seem correct.
Anyway, thank you for these words. They were very kind. >I genuinely hope you find a woman, fall in love, and have family.
>Woman Thinks She's Living Out Of Her Car Because Her Dad Has White Privilege Some hints on this ungrateful rebellious cunt. - She is a mudshark with a mulatto daughter and most likely she is paying the toll - She works 2PM to 9AM, the whore' shift - She is extremely butthurt because daddy won't give her any money - She lives in Camden NJ, an extremely bad ghetto hood By the way, according to her, she is the victim.
>>363963 I just downloaded the file and tried the password again, and it worked: MareButtBestButt
Maybe you need to download and install 7-zip, probably should have chosen a more common format when compressing that file. https://www.7-zip.org/download.html
No....... My mom has not heart and hates her own son. I don't think she will ever change so I will be leaving this house that she said would be restful only to find out she is steeling pills off of me. So no woman are not people. They drain all the life out of you and then leave with possibly an other man
>MAD UK: $320M ‘Model Prison’ Has EIGHTEEN Female Guards Ousted For Sexual Affairs With Male Prisoners >“Eighteen female guards have reportedly been fired or resigned for having illicit sexual affairs with prisoners – some involving smuggling phones and drugs – since the £250million prison opened six years ago. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/06/mad-uk-320m-model-prison-has-eighteen-female/
Women and their power-play to control men in a marriage. The following is from a Christian point of view, but the female pattern behavior is universal. Do not dismiss it.
>The Ways Wives Try to Control Their Husbands >Sexual denial, threats of divorce and threats of suicide. These are the three primary ways that wives use to manipulate and gain complete power over their husbands and their homes. The first way which works with the majority of men is sexual denial. Women use sex as a reward system. If the husband follows his wife’s wishes in whatever she wants to do in the home she will give him sex as a reward for his submission to her. At the slightest resistance of the husband to anything the wife wishes, she will turn off the sexual tap. https://radiochristianity.com/the-ways-wives-try-to-control-their-husbands/
>>365195 >answers to this problem After reading the article, it doesn't look completely answered for a man in a relationship with a woman who refuses still to have sex with him. Confronting her is one thing, getting her to comply is another.
>>365196 >Confronting her is one thing, getting her to comply is another. Yup. Sadly this is spot on. As long as the mercenaries are not disarmed women will have the upper hand.
>>365209 >Too nigger-tier for me I would say too pacified and brainwashed. Along ages women have been property, this is undeniable and the wisest status for those beings.
>>365210 Yeah, but there are ways to control women and have a healthy relationship with them without violence, without letting the woman manipulate you. Not only that, but 'disarming the mercenaries' isn't a realistic reality for most people for the foreseeable, so this is basically useless advice for most married men. >Want to have a healthy marriage? First you need to overthrow the government and restructure society Most men, even if they agree with you, are just going to give up or dismiss you when they hear "advice" like that, and resign themselves to never being able to have a relationship until after the revolution, if it ever comes. That doesn't help men who want to get married, and it definitely doesn't help white birthrates, so it's not a "solution".
>>365212 >Yeah, but there are ways to control women and have a healthy relationship with them without violence Sure, as long as the goodies keep coming you might expect her compliance. And as soon as you enter in troublesome times expect her to monkey branch, like clockwork. Remember, they achieved "liberation" and are ""equals." /s
>>365217 Of course not, just to discipline her when needed and naturally to demand what's expected from her. She is a woman after all and must render her goodies to the marriage.
>>365220 6, only because I let it fall apart when I moved out of state, instead of asking her to come with me when we were serious about it. I'm feel like she might have come, but it's too late for that... Now answer my question. How do you handle your relationship? Answer >>365219
>>365222 Questions for me, but not for thee. I see how it is. How mature of you to ask me about myself when you can't even come to terms with your own relationships, or lack thereof. But don't mind me, keep spouting off your edgy reddit-tier larp nonsense about how the only way forward is to violently beat/rape women into submission, and that none of us can hope to do so until we overthrow the government. That's totally a realistic, intelligent and productive way to proliferate the white race.
>>365223 >But don't mind me, keep spouting off your edgy reddit-tier larp nonsense about how the only way forward is to violently beat/rape women into submission, and that none of us can hope to do so until we overthrow the government. That's totally a realistic, intelligent and productive way to proliferate the white race. It might be a fantasy at this point, but to increase the birth rate depends on the removal of obstacles. Number one is restore the women's status to property and the suppression of all those opposing it. Simple.
>>365224 Rearing children exposed to abuse and rape is just fucking begging them to become feminists and faggots. Whatever you think running a train on any white vagina you see will accomplish, all it will do is create defectors from your own loins. Now quit being a larper.
>>365229 >Now quit being a larper. 1 - There is a problem ---> low birthrate 2 - Obstacles are identified ---> removal is needed 3 - Result is a booming birthrate ---- What happens with women and kids is not the point, but the expansion of the White genes is.
>>365231 To make it short. Well-being and a comfy future is not contemplated, the race survival is. That implies women popping kids like crazy, by hook or by crook.
>>365231 I'm not going to argue the logistics of rape with you. That kind of thinking is not going to rear a healthy white populace. It's going to lead to racemixing or infertile kids and further rates of deaths of despair and ingroup hatred. The fact you really think that rape is just "removal of an obstacle" shows just how far removed you are from any concepts of morality, Godliness or love.
>>365234 >The fact you really think that rape is just "removal of an obstacle" That's a liberal feminist concept. Rape is called when a men who is not a father or husband (the rightful owner or tutor) damages other man's property. That has always been punished. In any case it is time for women to do their part, even if that means to serve a few years in a baby farm.
>>365235 You will never know the inside of a vagina, and for that I would pity you, had you not displayed your lack of care for a race and family that function well enough to facilitate the highs of the human experience. You will never be loved, and that is your fault.
>>365236 Dude (dude? more like a woman I sense), come down to earth, we are in crazy times and the time is running out for you to put forward muh feelings.
>>365237 Fuck you, go back to stormfed. If your idea of saving the white race is exposing them to the evils of the world from the moment of conception, then you should just go ahead and kill yourself and let the righteous inherit the yoke. FYI, male, and unlike you, I've had relationships before.
>>365238 >If your idea of saving the white race is exposing them to the evils of the world from the moment of conception As I said above, this is not about a safe and comfy life, but the survival of a race. Only a stupid cunt would put feelings and fear of dangerous situations over the emergency we are facing.
>>365239 >this is not about a safe and comfy life, but the survival of a race >implying that the key to survival is to make enemies with your own kids and guarantee them either not procreating or defecting to other races >implying that just raising a kid that isn't traumatized at birth is coddling I'd rather be a "feelings"fag than some savage faux-nigger dead set on number going up for a single generation and then plummeting again to bad planning and degeneracy. I can't believe I initially mistook this thread for some sort of shitpost thread or topical discussion on women's role as homemakers and partners. You just want to be Genghis Khan. Go stalk the city streets, you thirsty monkey.
>>365240 >I can't believe I initially mistook this thread for some sort of shitpost thread or topical discussion on women's role as homemakers and partners. Grow up, family is dead and unsupervised women running wild killed it. It is up to men to restore sanity.
>>365240 >>365242 You're kinda both right. It's definetly important to create a safe harbour for your children to grow up in, but one cannot deny the wickedness of modern woman. However, I wish we can still keep a civil tone about this. I honestly don't think these questions are easy.
>>365205 >As long as the mercenaries are not disarmed women will have the upper hand. I think this is where the argument should've ended. Rape is not a viable option to improve birthrates. The only scenario where the mercenaries are disbanded, is when /ourguys/ are already calling the shots. At which point you can simply ban higher education for women and whatnot. So they would be naturally forced into more traditional lifestyles.
>>365247 Basically this. Even if /ourguys/ seize control, that may not be for at least a decade, and I'm trying to have white children and build a family before my thirties, so that is not advice or an "answer to the problem" as >>365195 said. Even after /ourguys/ take power, rape would be a non-solution because by then we would have removed the brainwashing and pestilence from society that makes women behave like this in the first place. So in every circumstance, beating and raping women is a non-solution to the problem. It's just an edgy power fantasy from an asinine retard who can't comprehend a functioning traditional society where wives actually respect their husbands for any reason other than fear. It's both unfeasible and unnecessary, and talking about it amounts to less than larping as some edgy warlord in a fantasy land where everything is solved with brute force.
>>365247 >>365250 I may be susceptible to my own bouts of pessimism, but there is a point where one loses all humanity, and I think it's when they genuinely hate the opposite sex so fervently as to desire to beat and rape them for utilitarian purposes. The Germans were motivated by love of folk, and romance toward life itself. But if someone is incapable of seeing the love, hope and beauty inherent to marriage, I really do think that they are dead inside. If a people addled with post-war debt and depression managed to raise the birthrates and become powerful enough that it took the entire world jewry to knock them back down, then it can happen again. And it starts with an outlook wherein children are raised with the love of humanity in their hearts. Not where they fear and despise their father. OP, I'm done arguing and namecalling. Find God, however you may do that is not my concern.
>>365247 >Rape is not a viable option to improve birthrates. >>365250 >beating and raping women is a non-solution to the problem. >>365251 >to desire to beat and rape them for utilitarian purposes Well gentlecolts, you have it wrong. Your worldview derives from marxist ideas, specifically feminism and the "equality" lie. What you call "beating" has been standard procedure for ages until the 50s when Cultural Marxism made its entrance in America. Cunts would misbehave and their husbands would take corrective measures. What you call "rape" is also a cultural marxist oxymoron. In the commie narrative imprinted in your mind by the regime, women define when is "rape" or not according to "their" consent. This is absurd, women have not such an agency and what is "rape" or not is stipulated around men's property rights. JFYI.
>How The 'Great Society' Destroyed The Nuclear Family Structure In One Chart >Who destroyed the American family? >The argument can be made that the Great Society programs initiated the destruction of the nuclear family structure. The blame starts with President Lyndon B. Johnson's set of domestic programs in the mid-1960s that were used to fight 'poverty' but only discouraged work and destabilized families. >Six long decades of socialist welfare programs have aided in the break up of the nuclear family structure. In fact, a central tenet of Marxism is to dismantle this structure. https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/how-great-society-destroyed-nuclear-family-structure-one-chart
>>365264 >This is absurd, women have not such an agency and what is "rape" or not is stipulated around men's property rights. That's right, this is why the jews and their mason proxies pushed for women's liberation, or women's emancipation. Then women, by (((law))) were lifted to equal status with men, so men lost property, family rights, and decision power inside their homes, all under threats of violence by the State.
>>365264 This is the same argument that was thrown around in the pedo threads. Interesting. Basically, you are saying that something is necessary for white survival/civilisation, solely on the basis that it was done extensively in the past. That's not going to cut it. Things like women's voting rights or the welfare state, have clear explanations as to why they are detrimental. For example, the 1965 immigration act, was bad because it allowed non-whites into the states. Not because >post 1950's = bad.
Bear in mind I never even made a moral or ethical argument against rape. I simply questioned the necessity of it. Way to ignore my post, Anon.
>>365277 >Bear in mind I never even made a moral or ethical argument against rape. I simply questioned the necessity of it. Way to ignore my post, Anon. I noticed that too. It's all so tiresome.
>>365274 >frowned upon People frown upon things all the time. >>365281 I think that the arranged marriage is fundamental for a healthy society. Basically, two men who are friends decided to have their children marry. They let them get used to each other through meeting while their young and then eventually they grow up and marry. But if one of them doesn't consent to this marriage, it's rape, right? >>365277 This is a short version of why I think rape is necessary. What do you think about it?
>>365282 There's also another aspect to this. To mate is natural desire all creatures need fulfilled, it is similar to water to quench thirst. Since no one has a right to sex, a man could theoretically go through life virgin at no fault of their own. Does right or wrong mattter to such a man? Probably, but they are probably in increadible amounts of pain too.
>>365284 >since no one has a right to the food of another, a man could theoretically go through life starving at no fault of their own. Does right or wrong mattter to such a man? Probably, but they are probably in increadible amounts of pain too. >so why not consume human flesh?
>>365287 I was more implying that by your philosophy we should treat rape as just another way of getting your rocks off, no big deal. And not a horrific thing that polite society rightfully shuns. The fact you see no issue is just proof that you should never leave the house.
>>365282 >This is a short version of why I think rape is necessary. Arranged marriages? That's a whole other discussion when compared to what Anon was saying. Then again, forced marriages ignore the man's volition as well.
>>365288 >by your philosophy we should treat rape as just another way of getting your rocks off, no big deal. Hmm, well that's no what I was trying to say. More that a good society has to consider the consequences of human sexual nature. If society doesn't take that into consideration, many men will suffer. When people suffer they either cry or attack. This leads civil war or cuckery. Maybe I'm off tho. Is there something in here that doesn't follow? >>365289 >That's a whole other discussion Ah, okay. >forced marriages ignore the man's volition as well. Hm, I think I don't really care about freedom as a concept. Just seems unattainable to me. But sure, there could be some wrinkles here that need to be ironed out.
Who ever does the will of God is my brother or sister. God will unite two to make one. The solution requires divine intervention and integration. More to the point as known the family court only 'works' if a person is ready to burn everything to save their children. Infinite checks from fucking around. Lies and manipulation the bread and butter. There's a four fold problem >relationship >hostile malpractice >hostile entities (mental contamination) >public how to guides are warped Way back you needed whole family units to vet people. The vetting process needs to occur the long and short of it is this. <Use Friendship Make good friends with femanons and have them match-make you. >Where does anybody find horsefucker femanons? That's the thing, that's not needed. Have such friends (or more) would be great, but making do with the current resources is a skill. >The language barrier. Roughly guessing 80% of Females don't speak the same language. While the words might be English or whatever, the emotional metacontext is the content embedded in the communication channels (verbal, dress, body movement, style ect ect ect). Which means a few things. Much of it is subconscious. I would suggest that this is also linked to how females tend to shop and buy more 'other stuff' and advertisment. Anyway as known there are a few known danger groups. Everybody already knows them. As shown in the post bellow. >>360970 Also hoeflation >>358440 Perhaps second to most important is reading the training manual. The first is divine guidance and participation. To be unshakable. Taming women. Find the fixer-upper. And fix it. Not a shipwreck, with radioactive waste. Unless you want extremely hard mode. >>357351
>Barbaric Sex Crime: 18-Year-Old Tourist Gang-Raped by Migrants in Spanish Hotel Room (Video) >According to the victim, a German tourist, she initially met one of the accused at a party and voluntarily followed him to his hotel room. However, upon entering the room, she noticed that some of the man’s friends were intoxicated, prompting her decision to leave. The men prevented her from leaving the room and proceeded to gang-rape her while others watched. The crime was reportedly filmed on cell phones. https://rairfoundation.com/barbaric-sex-crime-18-year-old-tourist-gang-raped-by-migrants-in-spanish-hotel-room/ https://twitter.com/poxesfoxes/status/1680770713106489346 RAPE!!! RAPE!!! RAPE!!! RAPE!!! screams the provocateur and her simps and commies enablers. Reality is that she is a whore in a freelance sexual rampage. According to her, it is a crime that more men penetrated her than the one she wanted. The gall of that stupid cunt. In a foreign country, looking for exotic men to fornicate with, alone and without a tutor or husband to claim property on her sexuality. What could go wrong?
>>365294 >situation was far less easygoing than expected and she turned to leave >was stopped from exiting and forced to fuck multiple people she didn't want to >this somehow isn't rape OP, I'm not even defending sex tourists or cock-carousel activity. You're just looking for individual cases to prove your theory that there is literally no such thing as non-consensual sex within marriage and you should be allowed to bend your wife over any time and any place no matter what and even five minutes' delay is just uppity-skank behavior. Which is asinine.
>>365296 >You're just looking for individual cases to prove your theory that there is literally no such thing as non-consensual sex within marriage It is a fact. Once the marriage contract is signed, the goodies must be delivered.
>>365297 >but that's pretty clearly rape, and by a pack of savage niggers. It is what she wanted. The difference is that there were more penises than expected.
>>365299 It's incredibly telling that you completely skipped over >>365293 as if nothing that he said was valuable. That is not only the solution to our current predicament, but antithetical to your notion of just treating the other sex as a volatile hatchery for children you clearly don't care for either.
The idea of going to a popular gathering place to meet and find a relationship, however fleeting, is something called dating. I don't know if you know this concept. This barely-legal adult was looking for a relationship with a stable and successful man who spoke the same language as her, while touring through Spain, another at least passably white place. What would have satisfied you? For her to stay in her father's house until he married her off to some random man who owned a company he wanted to merge with? To stay out of the sun until her time to be a walking incubator has come? The role of woman is not merely to look pretty and fuck on command. Take your infertile MGTOW ass out of here and back to /r9k/. https://odysee.com/@ashalogos:92/the-war-on-the-masculine-and-feminine:d Despite claims to the contrary, your Elliot Roger model of humanity acting like insects is nothing more than the projection of anti-whites who want the sexes to be eternally at odds with one another.
>>365300 >popular gathering place to meet and find a relationship >is something called dating >stable and successful man who spoke the same language as her Any more apologies in your book?
>>365303 No I think I hit the nail on the head. You're a midwit who thinks they have it all figured out because you watched one too many Sandman or Mayor of MGTOWn videos and so you're spreading your antisocial behavior to the site.
>>365305 No, the topic is now this: you're a fucking idiot whose entire life is dedicated to putting things down without a proposed thing to build. You spent your whole life fighting against and never for, because you clearly detest notions of a natural, healthy and loving life. You'd rather sit in your cheap apartment or family home and bemoan the death of womankind and propose impossibly difficult answers like completely disarming the police so you can rape women for insolently denying you sex, but it's totally not rape because she's asking for it.
Fuck you, fuck this thread, and fuck anyone who, after seeing you with your pro-white mask well and truly removed, continues to participate in this absolutely kiked and soulless thread.
>>365308 >Fuck you, fuck this thread, and fuck anyone who, after seeing you with your pro-white mask well and truly removed, continues to participate in this absolutely kiked and soulless thread. Sorry you are frustrated anon. Cognitive dissonance is not easy.
>>365309 And you have the nerve to accuse everyone who disagrees with you of psychoanalyzing you. Don't you fucking pretend to be sympathetic to me. Kill yourself. >>365311 You too, nigger.
>>365291 Yeah, it's not so much an argument against arranged marriages. I was trying to point out why forced marriage is different from what Anon is/was suggesting. I could've worded that a little better. >>365284 >If society doesn't take that into consideration, many men will suffer. When people suffer they either cry or attack. This leads civil war or cuckery. I think I agree. In my opinion, Incels are largely correct. And their rage can be justified. Given individual circumstances.
Ahem. Anyone here realizes what OP is saying is nothing extraordinary? His framework is exactly how it was 70 years ago and before from the beginning of time. You faggots are so outraged because your minds have been manipulated to see what always has been right and just for both sexes in every culture, as unnatural. Women are physical and mentally inferior, they are like children, and subordination to men is natural. It is you with your indoctrination who resist and insist to give them free reign to behave like men. Just saying.
>>365317 >I was trying to point out why forced marriage is different from what Anon is/was suggesting. I could've worded that a little better. Nah, that's fine. I think it came through well. >I think I agree. (wit rest of context) Well, I'm stoked about this. ^^
>>365305 You keep ignoring everyone else's points without refutation, baselessly calling them communists, and yet you accuse others of "deflecting". How can you expect to have a coherent conversation this way?
>>365307 Not just his replies, but all the others, some of which made very logical and sensible arguments about the topic at hand that you simply ignored, or called them names. You have zero grounds to bitch about how other Anons are arguing.
OP complains that people are psychoanalyzing him when this is pretty much his personal therapy thread, which is funny. Anons should start charging him out of his disability check or whatever. >>365332 >Anyone here realizes what OP is saying is nothing extraordinary? Yes. It's the same claptrap that gets repeated by every other incel/pua/shill/fed on the internet. It's not very original.
If I wasn't so convinced that OP is an actual autistic retard, then I'd just assume this was a psyop thread.
>>365340 Exactly, the only reason people are able to perpetrate the notion that the shit OP says is "nothing extraordinary" is because we had details like "person" meaning "property owning citizen" or joint voting in households because families were supposed to vote as a unit. These small details according to the shills are supposed to support the notion that women have literally no value to society except baby-making. But in reality, even throughout ancient history, men and women have seen one another as supplementary to one another, not equal, but not superior or inferior.
I'm so sick of these notions because it does absolutely nothing to aid the cause of raising birthrates unless you want to gut white civilization of its heart and soul. White people are where they are, first and foremost, because men and women have become competing worker units who see one another as obstacles to their happiness. And not the fucking KEY to their happiness. It's not just about sex, it's about companionship, support, family, and faith.
I will happily slide this thread with horsepussy for every needless incel response, because I am completely sick of this swill being on the first page. It does nothing but demoralize young men on the site by convincing them that all women without exception are beyond help. OP's already stated as much.
>>365332 >Anyone here realizes what OP is saying is nothing extraordinary? Yeah, these kinds of shit takes aren't scarce at all. Nothing novel or intriguing. >His framework is exactly how it was 70 years ago and before from the beginning of time. Not even completely true. >It is you with your indoctrination who resist and insist to give them free reign to behave like men. Not one Anon in this thread has said that. >>365340 Basically this.
>>365341 >I will happily slide this thread with horsepussy for every needless incel response I have been here since mlpol's first summer, I like horsepussy so you filling the thread with it won't really push me away from it. >because I am completely sick of this swill being on the first page. Well, I think it's an important discussion to have so you know I'll bump it if so.
I'm not trying to fight you here or anything but I'm just telling you how I will act in such a case.
>It does nothing but demoralize I disagree that this is a concern. Everything we talk about on this site may demoralize. If what we state here is true, then it's just useful for men to know what to except when they go into a relationship. I will agree with you if people start talking about how we shouldn't try to procrate with woman, then we have a problem. Till then however, criticizing woman is just that.
I also think you have an over-romanticized view on woman, which is why you can't allow any really criticism towards them.
This yin and yang stuff means nothing to me (just to let you know). Someone created this because men want this to be true. They don't want the woman they marry to be a whore so they like to imagine the opposite.
You relay too much on "finding the one" woman to give yourself meaning. There are other things in life than woman. Like, friendship with men.
Of course, I'm making some assumptions but I feel like I'm right. Feel free to inform me where I'm wrong.
>>365345 >I also think you have an over-romanticized view on woman, which is why you can't allow any really criticism towards them. I allow criticism. I do not allow out-and-out abuse nor do I allow sexual slavery. OP openly advocates for both.
>You relay too much on "finding the one" woman to give yourself meaning. There are other things in life than woman. Like, friendship with men. "The one" is a myth, but romantic relationships are there for a reason, the most clearly valuable of which is proliferating the species. Sure you can have friendship with men. But I'm sure you're not about to say fucking a dude is less gay than dating. Unless you're Nick the Cat-holic of course.
>>365346 >I allow criticism. Maybe you do. I feel like there's posters in this thread that don't though, so I guess that why I felt that way. >do I allow sexual slavery. I mean that does sound bad but I do like to problematize this more. I don't think it's this simple. Like, if you're wife starts to refuse you sex until you do what she tells you to, what do you do then? Maybe, not even that bluntly, but you know she could just similar things on minor scale for minor stuff to manipulate you into doing things.
There's also that society isn't fifty-fifty split in the burden of its upkeep. Woman's main contribution to society is giving birth and caring for children, men does the entire rest of the equation and today, they don't even do the latter. If they then refuse sex, there are no children. I guess it's less sexual slavery as it's sexual employment but in tradition society, they don't really have another job either.
>but romantic relationships are there for a reason I guess but I assume one has to genuinely care for that person in such a deep way. There are a number of obstacles before I could get there emotionally and I feel like no one would be willing to meet me half-way there. To mention a few, I'm a nazi it's unlikely that the woman I engage with is going to be thrilled about that so then it becomes a question if I tell her that or not. If change her opinion, it's probably because I'm attractive enough for her to compromise. Which might sound nice at first, but it also implies that she's a sycophant. I guess, I would be forgive her for that since that's a very human trait, though. There's also the looming threat of her leaving me. This can even happen randomly. And kinda so on. I just don't think putting so much emotional stock into woman is a good decision. Ultimately, what drives me to woman is my sexuality so I feel like if I have to anchor my feelings onto someone else, then I rather do it on someone I love (to me love is a non-sexual feeling) and trust like a friend.
>>365347 >if you're wife starts to refuse you sex until you do what she tells you to, what do you do then? Maybe, not even that bluntly, but you know she could just similar things on minor scale for minor stuff to manipulate you into doing things. When people say this, it sounds as though communicating with people isn't an option and bargaining can only be done by women. First step: seek out a woman who explicitly wants to have kids. Second step: don't expect sex as a daily immediate thing, but as an occasion when both parties are up to it. If a long time passes, step 3: make an ultimatum you plan to make good on, i.e. drop financial support if she will not support your desire to start a family.
>There's also that society isn't fifty-fifty split in the burden of its upkeep. Woman's main contribution to society is giving birth and caring for children, men does the entire rest of the equation and today, they don't even do the latter. Homemaking, maintaining social connections with others within the community, and raising and aiding in educating kids in the necessities are all important. >I guess but I assume one has to genuinely care for that person in such a deep way. There are a number of obstacles before I could get there emotionally and I feel like no one would be willing to meet me half-way there. Caring for someone deeply is the biggest reason for a couple to stay together. And sure, people will be put off by your politics/philosophy, but all you have to do is downplay it and learn to conduct yourself in a way befitting of your beliefs. If you're a loud-mouthed skinfed who shouts nigger at anything darker than you on main street, people will distance themselves from you. If you're Jared Taylor, if you are erudite, clean-shaven, soft-spoken but confident, et cetera, the average person on the street is willing to be open with you. And relationships, both platonic and romantic, will be easier to come by. >There's also the looming threat of her leaving me. This can even happen randomly. That's why you don't find your mate at a rave. Go to hobby relevant meetups. Talk to people on the street. Hell, go to church, and learn to bite your tongue on the stuff that's kiked and offer insight when you can.
>>365341 >I will happily slide this thread with horsepussy Ever since the bump limits were raised to 700+ posts, sliding threads with mares has become unfeasible, rendering rule 10 ineffective.
>>365375 Well, a thread that could stay on-site and potentially on the front page for months, can have its lifespan cut in half. That's gotta be worth something.
>>365393 For every response you give bemoaning the basics of human nature and suggesting we commit evil upon our other half, I'll share a post with horsepussy. Until this page is bumped off.
I know it's you, Boom Boom. Go ruin another community.
>>365350 >bargaining can only be done by women. Well, woman do have more options, in general. Woman are privileged to have men seek them out. They have way more potential partners at the ready while the same cannot be said to be true for men. >don't expect sex as a daily immediate thing, but as an occasion when both parties are up to it. If a long time passes I don't know if men expects this but I can imagine men being pushy when turned on. Though, I feel like the truth is something like if a woman is attracted to a men, she goes out of her way to appease him. So if she doesn't want sex, and it's not that she's feel sore or whatever, it might be a sign that she doesn't really care for him that much anymore. >make an ultimatum you plan to make good on Last autumn, my friend had weird kind of an on/off relationship with a woman. He told me about his grievances about her sometimes and one time, she called him while at my place. She literally got him to leave then and there, to hang out with her I think it was for something trivila to, but I don't remember.. I asked him the obvious question once, after he had vented to me about her, why he was still with her if she was so (paraphrasing) annoying and he told me that she had good sides. He also insisted that he was in loved with her for her personality.
She basically got him jumping through hoops, but hey, he got laid.
It's easy here to condemn him as a weak-willed man with zero integrity but I see the truth. Him and me, are one and the same. Only difference is that I would actually see the bars of my cage if I was in his situation but that doesn't mean I would automatically squeeze through them to escape.
"If I play my cards right, I could get with this woman." "Besides, a real man would woo her off her feet and I'm a real man." "No one else should have her." Is what I believe he thought on some subconcious level.
Ultimately, this is just an anecdote tho.
>The rest of the post. I kinda felt that your advice was sorta dismissive. Like, >If you're a loud-mouthed skinfed who shouts nigger at anything darker than you on main street I held back on parodying this idea for the sake of the conversation but who does this? Only true chads like Chris-chan have such huge and meaty balls to attempt something like that and we'd all look whack in comparison. Besides, people always try to present their best when trying to attract a mate. >clean-shaven Woman like beardlets? :S However, I will take your advice in the assumption that you meant well, so thanks. >That's why you don't find your mate at a rave. Go to hobby relevant meetups. Talk to people on the street. Again, not saying that one shouldn't try to seek out a woman or anything here but I don't believe that the woman on the rave is not the same you meet at a hobby relevant meetup. Our civilisation has been promiscuous for decades now.
>>365396 >Until this page is bumped off. Well, I think this conversation is important to have so even if it gets bumped off, I'll probably post a sequel of somekind. If you want to censor us, you'll need mod help.
>>365397 Thank you, Boom Boom for contributing to our community. You're appriciated.
>>365402 >boom boom What did he actually do tho? I'd say he just does controversial shit all the time. But when you are literally the only sad mf who simps for him. I can't really call that controversial.
The true travesty is the reading comprehension. As I've said before the drugs being piped into females fucks with their minds. Drugged up they're seeking out group males and short to no commitment. >The pills designed to stop childbirth reinforce behavior for fucking around. Actually getting a decent try be cut and impossible because of a thing taken with water. If you're in a relationship and they take them their emotional capacity for deeper love is hampered. Their feelings about you are now different and unable to have some of the chemical depth the relationship used to have. If it's a new relationship while they are on such drugs that depth can't take root. What a suprise! As all relationships are lessened, having one with groups such as goberment is the choice that gives all the secondary stuff they wanted as fucking around is the only way to get even a hint of what they could have had. Not to mention the lessened relationship with children which also raises crime rates. They're not in their right minds. This is why there is need for divine intervention for this.
>>365402 >I held back on parodying this idra for the sake of the conversation but who does this? My ex did. I knew a lot of people who did. One guy played Moonman music with his dorm room open in a giga-liberal volunteer corps I was in. Usually, knowing the consequences of talking like that, they shy away from it in public but still whisper it when they think the subject can't hear. And that's in SoCal, liberal land JewSA. Tact is in rapidly dwindling supply. >Woman like beardlets? If you grow a beard, actively maintain it. But if your face grows scabby and whiteheads form beneath your fuzz, deal with that. >Our civilisation has been promiscuous for decades now. True as that might be, a nerdy girl who watches Wendigoon probably doesn't go shopping for cocks. The other anon talking about finding a fixer-upper was getting at something similar. Fill a niche for her that wouldn't be filled by some bix nood. Ask provocative questions without judging her answer, and subtly file down the game breaking differences or seek out a girl more fitting of your worldview. It's really not too different from finding friends, just with the long game in mind.
>if you want to censor us >us I only want to bully Boom Boom off the site for making every thread a facebook wall of bad memes that come with the presupposition that if you're not his carbon copy then you're a sheep. It's exhausting and doesn't help anything when people are more interested in posting smug reaction pics in response to any criticism than who might be willing to argue their stances.
>365459 >365461 >365464 No {U}s today. Believe it or not, 365458 and I aren't the same person. If you wanted to involve staff in it, they could vouch for the fact those posts aren't mine. And I'd be happy to take it off-site. When Boom Boom fucks off from here and has a stroke, I'll happily return to my position and enjoy ponies.
>>365465 >Doesn't know how to sage >Doesn't understand (You)s At least get back to posting horsepussy. Err, actually don't. I would be so rekt and would never recover if you posted more horsepussy. Please don't do that! I would hate so very much for boomies to be drowned out in a sea of pastel equine genitalia. I'd seethe so hard because I HATE horsepussy and love tranny nigger-jews.
>>365468 Mine are better. You're gonna have to post a lot of horsepussy, anon. I really don't that you're up to the task. Only a truly based man could accomplish such a herculean task.
>>365475 I think that comparing posts from his device and mine would provide a cut and dry case that we're not the same person. I don't have any VPN or proxies and see no reason to conceal myself here since I've already said enough to develop an accurate picture of myself over the years. I know at least one member of staff can connect recent posts to things from up to a year ago. If only Boom Boom could say the same, instead of being opaque and deceitful in just about everything he does.
>>365477 What can I say? Most of my smut is in written form. My artistic tastes are practically nil. I could get off to stick figures if need be, as long as there's a story behind them.
>>365478 Eh, I don't even get off to clop, but I like to keep a higher quality collection. I think it's just aesthetically pleasing. Have some more autistically curated smut.
>FIFA Begs Fans to ‘Do the Right Thing’ and Buy Tickets as Women’s World Cup Gets Underway with Many Unsold Seats >With the Women’s World Cup getting underway Thursday, CNN reported Wednesday that FIFA was still struggling to sell tickets to the monthlong event, which is being co-hosted by Australia and New Zealand. >In an effort to turn that around, FIFA President Gianni Infantino implored New Zealanders to purchase tickets for the women’s soccer showcase. >In the United States, the women’s soccer team has alienated many conservative fans with liberal political rants and social justice advocacy. >FIFA is ensuring direct payments to the female participants, marking the first time in history that such compensation is guaranteed. Each player participating in the tournament will receive a minimum of $30,000 from a record $110 million prize pot. >The move reflects the efforts of the USWNT and others in lobbying for equal pay despite the undeniable reality that women’s soccer generates less revenue and has a smaller fan base than men’s soccer. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/07/fifa-begs-fans-right-thing-buy-tickets-womens/ Another example of what's wrong in society. Tomboys and lesbians playing manly roles.
>>365459 It's a bit frustrating when your argument is met with such a shit response. There's another example in this thread. I don't see what's so wrong about asking him, or the other anon to elaborate.
>>365480 >some random bullshit about sportball The only problem with this is that the people behind the women's sports implore everyone to watch them just because vagina. Sports are good for everyone involved, including women. Have some horsepussy.
>>365499 >The only problem with this is that the people behind the women's sports implore everyone to watch them just because vagina. Seems like a big thing. >Have some horsepussy. Right back at ya. ^^ >>365501 I guess nothing so long as they don't neglect their real job, being mothers. Or, do you disagree? Though, it feels close to the liberal "What does it matter?"-arguement. As in, what does it matter if a pair of lesbians adopts a child? Can't they be loving parents anyway? Or maybe I'm just seeing patterns that I want to see.
>>365503 >I guess nothing so long as they don't neglect their real job, being mothers. Or, do you disagree? Silly me, I thought soccer was a sport that you did in your free time with your community and got some sun in a world rapidly becoming afraid of being outside. >Though, it feels close to the liberal "What does it matter?"-arguement. As in, what does it matter if a pair of lesbians adopts a child? Can't they be loving parents anyway? I'm not even going to dignify that with a response. >Or maybe I'm just seeing patterns that I want to see. Yes.
>>365501 >What is wrong with women playing soccer? I was afraid some liberal would ask. Women don't belong in a stadium, let alone to perform sports for public amusement. Women belong to their homes, preferably busy in the kitchen as always has been.
>>365508 >women shouldn't perform sports >posts bluefast There is literally nothing wrong with girls doing sports. It keeps them athletic, healthy and attractive. Playing soccer and being a a traditional mother are not mutually exclusive activities.
This nigger seriously watched Leave It To Beaver as an infant and took nothing away from it except that women cannot be allowed to leave the kitchen for a single second. Why did I even bother. Have your shit thread, and your containment board/cloud storage page too.
>>365511 >Why did I even bother. Cos simping is a taught ability and very hard to quit. Also getting properly redpilled on women will change your mind.
>>365512 >enjoying women's sports is "simping" Retards learned this acronym from niggers on Twitter a few years ago, and now they use it for everything.
>>365514 >enjoying women's sports is "simping" Nope. Abetting women's liberation and resisting ideas to put them back in their natural place IS simping.
>>365504 >Pretty sure you can be a mother and also play soccer. Pretty sure I said so long as they don't neglect their job as mothers.
>>365507 >that you did in your free time Ah, I see. So do you think it's okay for woman to play soccer on the level these woman play it on? Can one be a soccer pro but also have time over to be a good mother?
>>365510 >I repeat myself: - "Women don't belong in a stadium, let alone to perform sports for public amusement" Hmm, I'm not sure what you're trying to say but it sounds like you want woman to be fat. But one can never be too sure.
>>365532 The simps positively know what they are doing. But because they cannot admit to be wrong, they are trying to initiate controversy as a form of obfuscation.
>Miami mom, 18, used fake hitman website in attempt to kill off 3-year-old son >A young Florida mother was arrested Tuesday after trying to use a parody service to rent a hitman to kill her toddler son. >Jazmin Paez, 18, allegedly solicited an assassin through the fake website RentAHitman.com to take out her 3-year-old before Thursday. >The Miami-Dade mom is accused of submitting pictures of her little boy and the exact location he was going to be, court documents obtained by NBC Miami show. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XoBkoLAj-ZY
>>365676 Sounds kinda familiar to that story of a woman who kill her mulatto son. >>365701 Is that true? I wouldn't have believed in it in the past, but now I've seen so much that I honestly can't tell anymore. >>365746 Well, to be fair, she didn't have intentions of killing her own dog.
>Ukraine’s baby factories rake in record profits amid chaos of war >While average Ukrainians suffer amid NATO’s proxy war against Russia, business is booming for the surrogate baby industry, which requires a steady supply of healthy and financially desperate women willing to lease their wombs to affluent foreigners. >Surrogates “have to be from poorer places than our clients,” explained the medical director of Kiev’s largest “baby factory.” https://thegrayzone.com/2023/07/28/ukraines-baby-factories-profits-war/ When cunts won't qualify for european prostitution.
>Racial Destruction Goes Awry >At first glance, the Kalergi plan from the early 20th century to politically unify Europe and destroy the European race through admixture with “the lesser races” might appear to be working as designed, as one Hapa’s lament for the product of White Male Asian Female couplings tends to indicate >So, we can reasonably anticipate that one of the inevitable results of the Kalergi Plan, mass immigration, and the endless marketing of mudsharking provided by the media will be the production of two new genetic elites, one of higher-quality Europeans, and a second that is a super-subset of very high quality Eurasians that could turn out to have some of the highest-performance genetics ever produced by Man. https://voxday.net/2023/07/31/racial-destruction-goes-awry/
>>365790 >nu-altmedia shilling eurasianism Guess that's why they tried to shill BLM supporter Aleksandr Dugin. Faggot's spamming so fast he posts in the wrong thread.
>>365798 >Faggot's spamming so fast he posts in the wrong thread. It is about women, White men's Yellow Fever, and high value individuals in the sexual rank. I believe the post belongs to this thread.
>>365790 >asia fetish Never understood this. Everything good invented by the asians relies on our innovations and inventions and has or will have a better version invented by whites. Even anime was inspired heavily by walt disney and shaped by budgeting. The degenerate modern anime market where isekai escapist soytoons and little sister degeneracy are the norm is shaped by the asian character. It's not a higher average intelligence that makes most asians elitist sociopathic conformists. They're whiter than the spics and blacks but I don't think mixing europe with them would improve us or them.
>>365803 They could be trying to shill eurasianism. See this [ >>365804 → ] There's tons of shills trying to push this guy on 4pol. Shit's big, even Richard Spencer has ties with him. Also. sup, bong.
>>365803 >Never understood this. The post explains it clearly. It is not about intelligence or accomplishments at all, but raw mating instinct and getting the highest value partner available, and willing of course.
>>365803 >Everything good invented by the asians relies on our innovations and inventions and has or will have a better version invented by whites I hate to sound like a Japan-obsessed weeb, but this statement is complete bullshit. If anything, it was the influence of decadent Western culture that ruined Japan. Japan was the culture that came up with Bushido warrior ethics and zen philosophy. For thousands of years up until the mid-nineteenth century they maintained a traditional civilization with a proper caste system and proper gender roles, that emphasized honor and a reverence for nature. They treated literally everything, from swordfighting to calligraphy to pouring tea to government administration, as deeply spiritual disciplines that required a lifetime of dedication and training to master. They also maintained absolute ethnic purity through isolation; for centuries it was punishable by death for any foreigner to enter Japan, and for any native to leave.
Their downfall came when the already-decadent West forcibly cracked them open as a market and began flooding their country with Western goods and Western ideas, at which point they realized they were in serious danger of being conquered and colonized. They overreacted by attempting to rapidly modernize and become an aggressive colonial power themselves. During WWII, already-decadent-beyond-all-hope-of-redemption America finally succeeded in completely neutering them by dropping two atom bombs on them, symbolically castrating their Emperor, and forcing them to demilitarize and become a modern democracy. Post-war they again tried to become a world power through economic prowess rather than war, but that didn't work out so well for them either. Now they're a race of depressed, miserable worker-bees whose lives revolve around meaningless careers. Whatever free time they have is spent trying to think up reasons not to kill themselves. Unsurprisingly, the younger generations are increasingly opting out of having careers and families, preferring to become NEETs mired in degenerate escapism.
In the end, probably their only remaining source of national pride stems from the knowledge that:
A), they still have a population that is overwhelmingly ethnic Japanese, and they have at least managed to hang onto a few tattered shreds of their original culture, which is more than America or Europe can say at this point; and B), they also managed to turn the very things that are destroying their youth into their chief cultural export, which means they at least have the satisfaction of knowing that the grandchildren of the people who dropped the bomb on them are now collecting fumos and going "uwu" at each other online and reading hentai comics about cross-dressing and incest.
I'm not saying Japan is perfect, but as far as resisting degeneracy goes, they at least deserve credit for holding out longer than we did.
>>365862 From its ancient history there have been two distinct classes of Japanese people, with one often portrayed with Aryan features like blue eyes and full beards. Their ancient bushido artifacts show symbols pretty much unanimous with Scythian culture, most prominent of which being the swastika. Personally I don't mind Japanese culture as far as traditions and history, regardless. But modern Japan is an extremely stark and depressing image, with or without ethnic purity. Romanticism and idealism are gone. Especially after decades of salaryman culture post-war have made just becoming an adult a horrifyingly steep learning curve which nigh-guarantees the use of drugs to either suppress one's shadow self or just keep up with the workload..
>>365864 I'm honestly more tired of the gymcel pol-larpers that jumped on the hate train. They point out Japan's birthrates as if that wasn't an issue on almost every single developed nation. Completely ignoring the fact they are being replaced in their own countries. That's without even talking about pedophilia.
Tbh they are a fucking scourge that continuously shits on everything pol unless it's fucking >muh go to gym. I blame Jewrdan peterstein and any assorted self-help faggot gurus that have grifted off impressionable would be polacks.
>>365870 So...what then? Just don't try? Clasp your hands together and pray for a savior? There's a solution, and at least a portion of it involves self betterment. It doesn't matter how you come to it; Peterstein is a profoundly hollow man trying to spread his ideas which end up only benefitting his handlers, but becoming more capable is only ever a good thing. At least if you plan on waiting for a new Fuhrer, it would be good to ensure that at least one more of his soldiers is fit, intellectually trained, prepared in what ways he can be, and socially well-adjusted.
By no means am I my ideal self. Far from it. But if you can't vote your way out of it, and violent revolution is unlikely to work unless organized...then train and organize.
>>365872 Self-improvement is a good thing. But some people have turned it into a fraudulent business model. It was inevitable once it got big enough.
There's another angle too. Peterson-types literally use self improvement to drive people away from "fringe ideologies". In that sense, I think it does matter where it comes from.
>>365870 That's fair and by no means is japan a bad country (they be neat people) but people put them on a pedestal a lot, I feel like. It is just weird because both commies, nazis, and, normies love Japan.
>>365870 >>365872 >>365875 >Self-improvement is a good thing. But some people have turned it into a fraudulent business model. This. >But if you can't vote your way out of it, and violent revolution is unlikely to work unless organized But also this.
Peterson preaches responsiblity, which is good but only to a certain extent. You can't take res-pone-siblity for others' mistakes neither can you, a single person, influence things on a macro-scale.
Sometimes all you can do is whine (aka raise awareness of an issue).
But it's also: >Peterson-types literally use self improvement to drive people away from "fringe ideologies". In that sense, I think it does matter where it comes from. This. It reminds me of a personal attack. The logic basically goes like this, "A critcises B. It's probably cuz A wants to be B. Accuse A of rationalizing their jealousy."
Like, if you criticize woman, you're a virgin. If you criticize blacks, you fear they will take your woman. If you claim that lol's champ rooster isn't balanced, you're hardstuck. You critcize rap, yo a hatin cuz u aint 'em.
Yes, sometimes this is where people are comming from but regredless of how biased someone is or not, it doesn't change whether or not what they say is a true of false.
Maybe, I'm reading too much into what you wrote. Maybe you just mean, which I agree with, that JP is an false opposition that is meant to keep people away from learning the full truth.
>>365866 >but we better. I don't really like the use of the word "better" here. Like, imo, it's true but even if it wasn't my people is my people it really doesn't matter who is better.
>>365896 >Maybe you just mean, which I agree with, that JP is an false opposition that is meant to keep people away from learning the full truth. Yeah, that.
There's also a new collective that's pretty much been redpilled on gender roles. At least to the point where they want to reclaim their masculinity. Which is great and all. But goddamn, they could use digging a bit deeper into politics if they are going to get into arguments with everyone online. They end up shitting on things that go hand to hand with their stuff. Worse of all, Peterson is probably the most popular intellectual for these guys.
Women are extremely susceptible to this sort of manipulation, if you’re that cruel. Doesn't have to be trans, you can just say “don't get angry at me just cuz you gained a lot of weight.” Many of them will take this bait even knowing that you literally have never seen them and can't see them. That’s how incredibly solipsistic they are by biology, unless they’ve learned to overcome it, which most really have not. It’s all about them, so encouraged by everything in our fake culture.
The Manipulated Man (German: Der Dressierte Mann) is a 1971 book by author Esther Vilar, originally written in German and translated to English by Eva Borneman. The main idea behind the book is that women are not oppressed by men but rather control men to their advantage.
The book argues that, contrary to common feminist and women's rights rhetoric, women in industrialized cultures are not oppressed, but rather exploit a well-established system of manipulating men.
Vilar writes, "Men have been trained and conditioned by women, not unlike the way Pavlov conditioned his dogs, into becoming their slaves. As compensation for their labours men are given periodic use of a woman's vagina." The book contends that young boys are encouraged to associate their masculinity with their ability to be sexually intimate with a woman, and that a woman can control a man by socially empowering herself to be the gate-keeper to his sense of masculinity.
The author says that social definitions and norms, such as the idea that women are weak, are constructed by women with their needs in mind. Vilar explains how it works: if women are viewed as weak, less is expected of them; and therefore they are given more leeway in society than men. Vilar states that women are generally "gold diggers" who attempt to extract money and other material resources from men. One means by which women control men to effect this transfer of resources is praise. Women dole out praise to men only when their needs are met in some way.
Another means of manipulation is the calculated use of emotional displays. Vilar claims that women can control their emotional reactions whereas men cannot, and that women create overly-dramatized emotional reactions to get their way: they "blackmail" men emotionally. Women also use sex as a tool of manipulation and control but also traditional concepts of love and romance, which are seen more positively than sex, to control men's sexual lives. Vilar writes that men gain nothing from marriage and that women coerce them into it under the pretense that it fulfills their romantic desires.
Are Women That Smart…..Really???? Pearl https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YYwAlChoZCw Video is seventeen minutes long, and one hundred and ninety-three megabytes at the default download resolution.
What is the maximum size / minimum resolution that would make sense to upload with the post? I don't want to eat up unnecessary amounts of bandwidth for a video of someone walking around talking into a camera. I've already spent over an hour and a half slowly messing around trying to register the --ffmpeg-location in order to get my installation of yt-dlp to work correctly regarding resizing video and converting file types, but it's a bit of a mess and I don't think I can keep wandering without a plan of attack, so I'll skip on getting a version of the video posted in this thread for now. You're getting the raw webm of audio, because I need the ffmpeg thing set up right in order to convert. Best I can do for now.
She's connecting a few dots here that aren't usually connected in the same video. I'm thinking that we might get a spiritual sequel to The Manipulated Man if she actually keeps learning and thinking.
Conversion research still ongoing. I'm finding that --ffmpeg-location isn't even being properly documented anymore, despite that being the command I'm instructed to use to set it. I'm currently on the hunt for some kind of master configuration file for this installation of yt-dlp or ffmpeg.
>>366286 >Starbucks coffee >Uber taxi Side comment. While she is making videos to cater the redpilled crowd with no makeup, she still is plugged to the Matrix. I don't trust her.
>>358457 >If mental health professionals were worth a damn they would encourage people to strive towards peak physical and mental health and help them get there.
>>358457 >>366314 >If mental health professionals were worth a damn they would encourage people to strive towards peak physical and mental health In my experience/knowledge, almost all mental health professionals encourage people to be physically healthy (exercise, eat healthy, sleep, etc), even the crappy ones. It's basically common knowledge that mental health and physical health are intertwined.
>>366315 Your experiences are not universal but I wish they were. I have never met a competent and morally sound therapist. Just a bunch of lazy lefties.
>>366330 Have you ever met a therapist who wasn't pro-fitness, or was somehow anti-fitness? It's standard procedure to start by asking the patient how often they go outside, what they eat, what they do for exercise, how well they sleep, etc. I've never heard of anything else except in niche cases.
>>366671 The fuck did you just post? A donation of some nature to a woman with the message that woman bad? You have no fucking context to this shit. This tells me nothing except that you can circle a message you agree with.
>>366673 >You have no fucking context to this shit. Actually the one without context is you. BTW, flipping reality in that fashion is called psychological projection. >This tells me nothing except that you can circle a message you agree with. Then you don't agree. What a cuck!
>>366675 The fuck are you smoking? There is no context to what you presented. What is this document? Is it just to find text that agrees with you? Then why is it a donation to a woman? That is the opposite of the point of this thread, moron. Women getting money, likely from a man, would work against your position.
What did I project? I stated an obvious truth. You didn't share any context. You are a moron for not doing this and sharing a donation image to a woman in the anti-woman thread. You then say I am without context. That is right. I have none because you don't have any to share, retard. This isn't reality flip, it is just you not fucking posting context of where you found this and randomly state this is suicide. Good job.
And you immediately assume what I agree or disagree with based on asking for what the fuck this means. Why is this a donation? Why is someone donating to a woman to say don't allow women to vote? That is counter-intuitive. That doesn't seem odd to you that someone is simp donating fucking $500 to say don't you dare use that money and go vote?
>>366676 >The fuck are you smoking? I'm vaping, son. >There is no context to what you presented. What is this document? Does it matter? I don't think so. The subject is women's destructive path, and you are splitting hair on irrelevant details. Why? you tell me. Controversy just for the sake of a controversy makes you look dumb.
>>366675 >>366671 Seriously though, what is this message supposed to be? Where did you get it? What's it about? Who is Ann Barnhardt, and how does donating money to her make up for women's suffrage?
>>366677 >Does it matter? Yes. What's the picture supposed to tell us? >The subject is women's destructive path You could have said that without the picture. What's this icontext supposed to mean? Is Ann Barnhardt some anti-suffrage politician, and the donation contributing to stop women's suffrage? >irrelevant details >Controversy just for the sake of a controversy Oh come on. You can't just post a $500 dollar donation to some random woman and not even tell us who she is.
>>366695 Friend, I know it's tempting to attempt to argue or get answers from him, but he's just going to rile you up more and drag you to his level. These threads are no man's land. I speak from extensive experience.
>>366707 Okay, you got me there, cause that part is pretty juicy. Still, I suggest letting him tucker himself out without actually giving him any attention. Even if it takes a few weeks...or months....
>>366696 >>366706 I have this terminal disease called "faith in humanity", that makes me want to give everyone the benefit of the doubt and assume that they're interested in good-faith conversations. Foolish, I know.