A purity spiral trend on the right has been emerging for a while now but it has only gotten worse in recent years. Disbelief in the whackiest conspiracy is taken as a sign of disloyalty and anything other then the most retarded take makes you a shill. Examples include:
>you think jews are nepotistic and spiteful to their hosts?
>well I think jews are actually a cult of satanic baby eaters you deradicalization, shill!
>you think the pharmaceutical companies are greedy assholes who pray on the despairation of sick people?
>Well I think everything the pharmaceutical companies sell is poison and I'm taking wormwood extract to cure my cancer, you cuck!
>you think mega companies moved jobs overseas because the CEOs are amoral pieces of shit who care more about money than the future of their country?
>Well I think its all part of a plan to weaken the West and install communism, FED!
>you are worried about 5G because you think it will greatly enhance digital surveillance?
>well I think 5G will cause cancer and mass death, fag!
>you think the covid vaccine was bad because lockdowns were used as an excuse to attack political enemies and side effects were ultimately worse than the disease?
>well I think its all a part of the NWO depopulation agenda, pharmakike!
>you are worried about AI because of job loss, propaganda bots, and surveillance concerns?
>well I think AI is actually a demonic force in computer form, fag!
>you hate Hollywood movies because they are controlled by a few studios who push stale liberal trash?
>well I think Hollywood is putting secret symbols and predictive programming in their films to control the population, tranny!
Ect
It isn't enough to distrust the failing institutions, you need to believe they are part of a satanic plot as well. This has only gotten worse over time and I suspect it will only continue get worse over time. Is there any way this can be stopped before it collapses under the weight of its own bullshit into a flat earth singularity?
And I know many of you will claim that some of the crazier claims are pushed by bad actors, and you are probably right to some extent, but silly shit like germ theory denial and flat earth are becoming more common especially on the right. Is there a way to stop this?
/mlpol/ - My Little Politics
1748184081.jpg (62.5 KB, 612x612, 445179cb7e0162b822f72d5519a2063f.jpg)
636 replies and 158 files omitted.
>>392054
You didn't even address his argument.
>character assassination
You called him an anti-white shill first, you absolute hypocrite. That's character assassination.
You didn't even address his argument.
>character assassination
You called him an anti-white shill first, you absolute hypocrite. That's character assassination.
>>392024
He just listed six different reasons for why he hates Jews. See >>392021 He is clearly not pro-Jew.
This is exactly what OP meant by purity spiralling. You meet another guy who hates Jews, but you ostracize him for not believing 100% of the conspiracies that you do. The result of that is a number of allies against the Jews.
He just listed six different reasons for why he hates Jews. See >>392021 He is clearly not pro-Jew.
This is exactly what OP meant by purity spiralling. You meet another guy who hates Jews, but you ostracize him for not believing 100% of the conspiracies that you do. The result of that is a number of allies against the Jews.
>>392060
>This is exactly what OP meant by purity spiralling.
OP is beyond salvation and calling him out is a community service.
If You See Something, Say Something.
>This is exactly what OP meant by purity spiralling.
OP is beyond salvation and calling him out is a community service.
If You See Something, Say Something.
>>392061
How is a person who hates Jews for six different reasons a "Jew apologist", just because they're skeptical of one additional reason? Explain that logic.
How is a person who hates Jews for six different reasons a "Jew apologist", just because they're skeptical of one additional reason? Explain that logic.
>>392065
It shows that they actually need reasons and not just vibes and desire for validation, and that they won't drink koolaid with the rest of the bandwagon when it's time to get raptured by aliens.
It shows that they actually need reasons and not just vibes and desire for validation, and that they won't drink koolaid with the rest of the bandwagon when it's time to get raptured by aliens.
>>392072
True, there are dozens, if not hundreds of reasons to hate Jews.
That doesn't mean that an Anon is pro-Jew for not believing one particular reason.
True, there are dozens, if not hundreds of reasons to hate Jews.
That doesn't mean that an Anon is pro-Jew for not believing one particular reason.
>>390847
>you think jews are nepotistic and spiteful to their hosts?
>well I think jews are actually a cult of satanic baby eaters you deradicalization, shill!
From the kikes' mouth, Israel’s Satanic Elite Revealed.
B-but that's schizo stuff.
https://voxday.net/2025/06/13/israels-satanic-elite-revealed/
https://www.israelhayom.com/2025/04/23/bottom-of-darkness-children-raped-in-ritual-ceremonies-expose-the-horrors/
https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-856407
>you think jews are nepotistic and spiteful to their hosts?
>well I think jews are actually a cult of satanic baby eaters you deradicalization, shill!
From the kikes' mouth, Israel’s Satanic Elite Revealed.
B-but that's schizo stuff.
https://voxday.net/2025/06/13/israels-satanic-elite-revealed/
https://www.israelhayom.com/2025/04/23/bottom-of-darkness-children-raped-in-ritual-ceremonies-expose-the-horrors/
https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-856407
>>392358
These articles do prove that there are some fucked up people in the halls of power, but they don't exactly show that jews are satanic baby eaters. Ritual abuse is horrific, but it isn't a uniquely jewish phenomenon. Christian priests notably catholics and Muslims have been known to do similar shit. These kinds of people use their positions of power to hide what they are doing and network with other fucked up people. In the halls of power intelligence agencies find these sick fucks easy to blackmail and therefore useful so the problem doesn't get fixed. I will acknowledge that fucked up networks of human trafficking exist, but I do not think they control the world or are representative of all of the elites or even kikes for that matter. And think about this, why would jpost even post an article about this if those kinds of people were controlling the world?
These articles do prove that there are some fucked up people in the halls of power, but they don't exactly show that jews are satanic baby eaters. Ritual abuse is horrific, but it isn't a uniquely jewish phenomenon. Christian priests notably catholics and Muslims have been known to do similar shit. These kinds of people use their positions of power to hide what they are doing and network with other fucked up people. In the halls of power intelligence agencies find these sick fucks easy to blackmail and therefore useful so the problem doesn't get fixed. I will acknowledge that fucked up networks of human trafficking exist, but I do not think they control the world or are representative of all of the elites or even kikes for that matter. And think about this, why would jpost even post an article about this if those kinds of people were controlling the world?
>>392359
>argument from incredulity
>#notalljews
Really? No shit, it isn't all jews, just like all muslims aren't involved in rape/grooming gangs.
It's always 'just' the ones who can get away with it
>argument from incredulity
>#notalljews
Really? No shit, it isn't all jews, just like all muslims aren't involved in rape/grooming gangs.
It's always 'just' the ones who can get away with it
>>392372
Again I'm not saying child abuse doesn't happen, but I don't think a satanic child abuse cult runs the planet. That is what I am getting at here. This thread is about how people not believing the most hyperbolic schizophrenic takes are often viewed as disloyal.
Again I'm not saying child abuse doesn't happen, but I don't think a satanic child abuse cult runs the planet. That is what I am getting at here. This thread is about how people not believing the most hyperbolic schizophrenic takes are often viewed as disloyal.
>>392374
No one has presently suggested disloyalty, what's being alleged is naivete. You haven't even made an argument, all you have done is display disbelief.
Lets try and put this another way.
What percentage of pedophiles commit crimes against children? Is it all of them all the time, or do they wait until they think they can get away with it?
>are you suggesting that little old jewish ladies will commit satanic child sacrifice
No, but like muslims and their rape gangs, they WILL support the ones who DO, either openly or tacitly, turning a blind eye.
No one has presently suggested disloyalty, what's being alleged is naivete. You haven't even made an argument, all you have done is display disbelief.
Lets try and put this another way.
What percentage of pedophiles commit crimes against children? Is it all of them all the time, or do they wait until they think they can get away with it?
>are you suggesting that little old jewish ladies will commit satanic child sacrifice
No, but like muslims and their rape gangs, they WILL support the ones who DO, either openly or tacitly, turning a blind eye.
>>392375
>What percentage of pedophiles commit crimes against children? Is it all of them all the time, or do they wait until they think they can get away with it?
Of course they wait until they get away with it.
>No, but like muslims and their rape gangs, they WILL support the ones who DO, either openly or tacitly, turning a blind eye.
I agree with this 100% and this is why I don't want these people anywhere near my country.
>What percentage of pedophiles commit crimes against children? Is it all of them all the time, or do they wait until they think they can get away with it?
Of course they wait until they get away with it.
>No, but like muslims and their rape gangs, they WILL support the ones who DO, either openly or tacitly, turning a blind eye.
I agree with this 100% and this is why I don't want these people anywhere near my country.
>>392375
>No, but like muslims and their rape gangs, they WILL support the ones who DO, either openly or tacitly, turning a blind eye.
And this is true of anything with kikes. Especially bad business practices and their nepotism makes the problem orders of magnitude worse than other ethnic groups. Again look at the original post.
>No, but like muslims and their rape gangs, they WILL support the ones who DO, either openly or tacitly, turning a blind eye.
And this is true of anything with kikes. Especially bad business practices and their nepotism makes the problem orders of magnitude worse than other ethnic groups. Again look at the original post.
>>392359
People that downplay JEWS have 0 grasp on todays politics.
Jews/judaism are not just random people that get in to positions of power.
It is basically oldest running criminal/evil organization in the world.
People that downplay JEWS have 0 grasp on todays politics.
Jews/judaism are not just random people that get in to positions of power.
It is basically oldest running criminal/evil organization in the world.
>you tricked me
Not for the first time ^_~
Not for the first time ^_~
>>392379
I do not downplay the jew. I believe they are not a "evil spiritual" phenomenon, but a biological phenomenon similar to slave making ants. When social structures get large enough there is an incentive for social parasitism and culture of the jew is adapted to social parasitism. The slave making ants do not enslave and destroy host colonies because they do so out of malice or allegiances to dark ant gods they do so because they are social parasites who can only survive by taking the resources of working ants. Similarly the jew is adapted to take the resources of other groups of people who do real work. Their culture and religion bind them together and give them license to behave like shit to their hosts and they do then the host has an "immune response" where they are removed and then they adapt new methods to evade the immune system. If the immune system does clear out an infection the host dies.
I do not downplay the jew. I believe they are not a "evil spiritual" phenomenon, but a biological phenomenon similar to slave making ants. When social structures get large enough there is an incentive for social parasitism and culture of the jew is adapted to social parasitism. The slave making ants do not enslave and destroy host colonies because they do so out of malice or allegiances to dark ant gods they do so because they are social parasites who can only survive by taking the resources of working ants. Similarly the jew is adapted to take the resources of other groups of people who do real work. Their culture and religion bind them together and give them license to behave like shit to their hosts and they do then the host has an "immune response" where they are removed and then they adapt new methods to evade the immune system. If the immune system does clear out an infection the host dies.
>>392394
I know some people here do not like Wikipedia, but these are worth reading.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slave-making_ant
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Host%E2%80%93parasite_coevolution
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parasitism#Social_parasitism
I know some people here do not like Wikipedia, but these are worth reading.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slave-making_ant
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Host%E2%80%93parasite_coevolution
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parasitism#Social_parasitism
>>392402
I am not religious, but you see how someone could view them from a non-religious standpoint and still view them as a civilization ending threat? Nothing I said downplays the severity of the enemy.
I am not religious, but you see how someone could view them from a non-religious standpoint and still view them as a civilization ending threat? Nothing I said downplays the severity of the enemy.
>>392403
>but you see how someone could view them from a non-religious standpoint
Given how religious thinking works I'm pretty sure they can't or don't want to. Like their continued ability to remain othered from their ideals and keep them instead on the object of their religion necessarily requires they don't think about how someone not under such bondage might instead think of something. Doing so would risk reclaiming those ideals as their own, being creative with them and destroying that religious understanding.
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/max-stirner-art-and-religion
>but you see how someone could view them from a non-religious standpoint
Given how religious thinking works I'm pretty sure they can't or don't want to. Like their continued ability to remain othered from their ideals and keep them instead on the object of their religion necessarily requires they don't think about how someone not under such bondage might instead think of something. Doing so would risk reclaiming those ideals as their own, being creative with them and destroying that religious understanding.
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/max-stirner-art-and-religion
>>392375
>No one has presently suggested disloyalty
People have been calling eachother Jews and shills throughout this entire thread.
>>392378
This.
>>392379
>People that downplay JEWS
Nobody is downplaying Jews.
>>392394
Interesting take. I largely agree.
>>392403
This.
[Read more] >No one has presently suggested disloyalty
People have been calling eachother Jews and shills throughout this entire thread.
>>392378
This.
>>392379
>People that downplay JEWS
Nobody is downplaying Jews.
>>392394
Interesting take. I largely agree.
>>392403
This.
>>392487
And niggers. Do you think that anyone is actually accusing people of being jews, niggers, faggots, etc., or is this ordinary anon-board faire?
And niggers. Do you think that anyone is actually accusing people of being jews, niggers, faggots, etc., or is this ordinary anon-board faire?
>>392488
>Do you think that anyone is actually accusing people of being jews, niggers, faggots, etc
Actually, yes. I've been here long enough to know that there are retards here who think that anyone who disagrees with them is a shill.
Whether or not they wholeheartedly believe it is an open question, but the purity spiral persists either way.
>Do you think that anyone is actually accusing people of being jews, niggers, faggots, etc
Actually, yes. I've been here long enough to know that there are retards here who think that anyone who disagrees with them is a shill.
Whether or not they wholeheartedly believe it is an open question, but the purity spiral persists either way.
>>392489
Then you haven't been here for long enough, but you're welcome to your interpretation. I'll suffice to say
>lol, can't handle the bantz
Then you haven't been here for long enough, but you're welcome to your interpretation. I'll suffice to say
>lol, can't handle the bantz
>>392490
It isn't so much "can't handle the bantz" so much as it is there was once a lot more actual political discussion and over time that discussion became shut down when intellectual midgets started shouting "shill shill shill" at any disagreement to avoid having a real discussion or challenging their views.
It isn't so much "can't handle the bantz" so much as it is there was once a lot more actual political discussion and over time that discussion became shut down when intellectual midgets started shouting "shill shill shill" at any disagreement to avoid having a real discussion or challenging their views.
>>392496
I mean if just wanted to be called heretic all day I could just start posting my spiciest takes on reddit until I get banned and make new accounts.
I mean if just wanted to be called heretic all day I could just start posting my spiciest takes on reddit until I get banned and make new accounts.
>>392496
This
It's 2017 /pol/ all over again. Except instead of redditors from /ptg/ (r/The_Donald) it's boomers from Facebook.
This
It's 2017 /pol/ all over again. Except instead of redditors from /ptg/ (r/The_Donald) it's boomers from Facebook.
>>392379
To up-play the problem, that organization includes every abrahamic religion. Go to any christian church and they'll pass around the offering plate and tell you to your face that it's for "defending" Israel and politicians that support israel and various islamic princes with oil rigs and gold mines. Never been to a mosque, but wouldn't be surprised if it's the same deal or similar. And since church attendance is required, you either see the problem and leave the religion entirely, or you stay and that becomes normal to you.
Abrahamism is the organization you're referring to, and limiting it to only jews downplays that. Jews cannot do what they do without christians and islamists, christians can't do what they do without jews, satanists (which is really just a type of christian) and islamists, and islamists can't do what they do without christians and jews. Recognising this is full scope doesn't downplay the role of any trirant composing it, but in fact adds to the list of reasons all three are reprehensible.
To up-play the problem, that organization includes every abrahamic religion. Go to any christian church and they'll pass around the offering plate and tell you to your face that it's for "defending" Israel and politicians that support israel and various islamic princes with oil rigs and gold mines. Never been to a mosque, but wouldn't be surprised if it's the same deal or similar. And since church attendance is required, you either see the problem and leave the religion entirely, or you stay and that becomes normal to you.
Abrahamism is the organization you're referring to, and limiting it to only jews downplays that. Jews cannot do what they do without christians and islamists, christians can't do what they do without jews, satanists (which is really just a type of christian) and islamists, and islamists can't do what they do without christians and jews. Recognising this is full scope doesn't downplay the role of any trirant composing it, but in fact adds to the list of reasons all three are reprehensible.
>>392498
>It's 2017 /pol/ all over again. Except instead of redditors from /ptg/ (r/The_Donald) it's boomers from Facebook.
Holyshit it is and many of the rtd posters were just as retarded as the facebook boomers so they became facebook boomers.
>It's 2017 /pol/ all over again. Except instead of redditors from /ptg/ (r/The_Donald) it's boomers from Facebook.
Holyshit it is and many of the rtd posters were just as retarded as the facebook boomers so they became facebook boomers.
>>392499
>Go to any christian church and they'll pass around the offering plate and tell you to your face that it's for "defending" Israel
This is mostly just American Evangelicals, a sect that has been so transparently subverted by Mossad it's unreal.
And that only really became a thing in the second half of the 20th century: it was a recently-manufactured cultural shift orchestrated by glowniggers.
>Never been to a mosque, but wouldn't be surprised if it's the same deal or similar.
Muslims openly hate Jews, and they double-hate Israel.
>church attendance is required
Not true.
>you either see the problem and leave the religion entirely, or you stay and that becomes normal to you
Or you go to another church that isn't as pozzed.
>Abrahamism is the organization you're referring to
"Abrahamism" is not an organization. It's not even one ideology.
>Jews cannot do what they do without christians and islamists
Jews have been doing what they do in the Egyptian, Roman and Persian empires, long before those religions rose.
They thrive in modern secular society too.
>christians can't do what they do without jews, satanists (which is really just a type of christian)
How? Christians survived in Europe without contact with Jews, Muslims or "Satanists" for thousands of years.
>islamists can't do what they do without christians and jews
Most Muslim countries have no Christians or Jews at all. They get a long just fine with their barbaric sandnigger lives without Christians or Jews.
>>392501
Ikr
[Read more] >Go to any christian church and they'll pass around the offering plate and tell you to your face that it's for "defending" Israel
This is mostly just American Evangelicals, a sect that has been so transparently subverted by Mossad it's unreal.
And that only really became a thing in the second half of the 20th century: it was a recently-manufactured cultural shift orchestrated by glowniggers.
>Never been to a mosque, but wouldn't be surprised if it's the same deal or similar.
Muslims openly hate Jews, and they double-hate Israel.
>church attendance is required
Not true.
>you either see the problem and leave the religion entirely, or you stay and that becomes normal to you
Or you go to another church that isn't as pozzed.
>Abrahamism is the organization you're referring to
"Abrahamism" is not an organization. It's not even one ideology.
>Jews cannot do what they do without christians and islamists
Jews have been doing what they do in the Egyptian, Roman and Persian empires, long before those religions rose.
They thrive in modern secular society too.
>christians can't do what they do without jews, satanists (which is really just a type of christian)
How? Christians survived in Europe without contact with Jews, Muslims or "Satanists" for thousands of years.
>islamists can't do what they do without christians and jews
Most Muslim countries have no Christians or Jews at all. They get a long just fine with their barbaric sandnigger lives without Christians or Jews.
>>392501
Ikr
>>392502
>This is mostly just American Evangelicals, a sect that has been so transparently subverted by Mossad it's unreal.
>it was a recently-manufactured cultural shift orchestrated by glowniggers.
Oh definitely, they glow as bright as a gun show. There's a good essay I read about that, in fact, if I find it I'll link.
>Muslims openly hate Jews, and they double-hate Israel.
>Most Muslim countries have no Christians or Jews at all. They get a long just fine with their barbaric sandnigger lives without Christians or Jews.
Well I'll look into that. I've sorta skipped over looking into what muslims are about since they're like, sand bandits with oil. Surely there's not much to them other than being in a nice spot geographically.
>church attendance is required
Well that's what the churches I attended said, is that an evangelical thing?
>Or you go to another church that isn't as pozzed.
My christianity phase was a cycle of going to every church on the map in my city and ecountering the same shit. If it's a matter of pozzed and unpozzed then the latter is geographically unavailable to me.
>"Abrahamism" is not an organization. It's not even one ideology.
All three will stab ya if you're pagan, and pagan is just anything non-abrahamic. If not an institution or ideology proper, they still cooperate when it comes to anti-paganism.
>Jews have been doing what they do in the Egyptian, Roman and Persian empires, long before those religions rose. They thrive in modern secular society too.
>How? Christians survived in Europe without contact with Jews, Muslims [...] for thousands of years.
Mostly talking about the modern institutions of these two.
>or "Satanists"
Is it a mainly evangelical thing to point at everything as satanic and conspiracies of authorities doing awful shit because of satanism (rather than economics)? Seems like christians need actual satanists around to keep the hype up.
[Read more] >This is mostly just American Evangelicals, a sect that has been so transparently subverted by Mossad it's unreal.
>it was a recently-manufactured cultural shift orchestrated by glowniggers.
Oh definitely, they glow as bright as a gun show. There's a good essay I read about that, in fact, if I find it I'll link.
>Muslims openly hate Jews, and they double-hate Israel.
>Most Muslim countries have no Christians or Jews at all. They get a long just fine with their barbaric sandnigger lives without Christians or Jews.
Well I'll look into that. I've sorta skipped over looking into what muslims are about since they're like, sand bandits with oil. Surely there's not much to them other than being in a nice spot geographically.
>church attendance is required
Well that's what the churches I attended said, is that an evangelical thing?
>Or you go to another church that isn't as pozzed.
My christianity phase was a cycle of going to every church on the map in my city and ecountering the same shit. If it's a matter of pozzed and unpozzed then the latter is geographically unavailable to me.
>"Abrahamism" is not an organization. It's not even one ideology.
All three will stab ya if you're pagan, and pagan is just anything non-abrahamic. If not an institution or ideology proper, they still cooperate when it comes to anti-paganism.
>Jews have been doing what they do in the Egyptian, Roman and Persian empires, long before those religions rose. They thrive in modern secular society too.
>How? Christians survived in Europe without contact with Jews, Muslims [...] for thousands of years.
Mostly talking about the modern institutions of these two.
>or "Satanists"
Is it a mainly evangelical thing to point at everything as satanic and conspiracies of authorities doing awful shit because of satanism (rather than economics)? Seems like christians need actual satanists around to keep the hype up.
>>392502
In one way I am glad that ethnonationalism has become adopted by normies but it seems to have been adopted by some of the most retarded normies and I suspect that is because low IQ Whites are especially disenfranchised.
In one way I am glad that ethnonationalism has become adopted by normies but it seems to have been adopted by some of the most retarded normies and I suspect that is because low IQ Whites are especially disenfranchised.
>>392505
Oldfag /pol/ users in 2017 described this as the devil's bargain: they won the election in 2016, but the result of that was being flooded with redditors.
Similarly, in 2021 the push to get people to shake off their blind trust in government, media and academic institutions largely succeeded in the aftermath of 2020 lockdowns, but the result was Q-tier boomers inviting themselves into right wing online spaces and shitting up the place.
Oldfag /pol/ users in 2017 described this as the devil's bargain: they won the election in 2016, but the result of that was being flooded with redditors.
Similarly, in 2021 the push to get people to shake off their blind trust in government, media and academic institutions largely succeeded in the aftermath of 2020 lockdowns, but the result was Q-tier boomers inviting themselves into right wing online spaces and shitting up the place.
>>392507
I remember this. I first started using /pol/ back in 2013. It has really gone down hill since then. They fall of 8chan was really devastating for discussion on the far right too. It's crazy to think about but /mlpol/ is probably the longest surviving alt-/pol/. The rest all got taken down due to shooters or drama.
I remember this. I first started using /pol/ back in 2013. It has really gone down hill since then. They fall of 8chan was really devastating for discussion on the far right too. It's crazy to think about but /mlpol/ is probably the longest surviving alt-/pol/. The rest all got taken down due to shooters or drama.
>>392507
This was among several of the - let's not call them errors, let's call them 'consequences' - that 4/mlpol/ made glaringly obvious, and is part-and-parcel to why we're here now and why there's a "here" to be 'now'
This was among several of the - let's not call them errors, let's call them 'consequences' - that 4/mlpol/ made glaringly obvious, and is part-and-parcel to why we're here now and why there's a "here" to be 'now'
>>392526
>and is part-and-parcel to why we're here now and why there's a "here" to be 'now'
Exactly we left /pol/ because it had become shit. Let's try to prevent this place sharing the same fate.
>and is part-and-parcel to why we're here now and why there's a "here" to be 'now'
Exactly we left /pol/ because it had become shit. Let's try to prevent this place sharing the same fate.
>>392528
Haaa, you don't know. This place will have it's own struggles, but it is in no danger of turning out like /pol/, in that you can take heart
Haaa, you don't know. This place will have it's own struggles, but it is in no danger of turning out like /pol/, in that you can take heart
Some depopulation stuff.
>>392539
None of these prove anything. Image one is some random on twitter. The second one is just Pfizer pitching about their product. And even the third one doesn't show that there is some secret plant to depopulate the planet. If you were an elite and the fertility crisis was ongoing and your immigration solution didn't work would you not bring that up at a meeting?
None of these prove anything. Image one is some random on twitter. The second one is just Pfizer pitching about their product. And even the third one doesn't show that there is some secret plant to depopulate the planet. If you were an elite and the fertility crisis was ongoing and your immigration solution didn't work would you not bring that up at a meeting?
>>392536
>This place will have it's own struggles, but it is in no danger of turning out like /pol/
You should not assume that /mlpol/ is immune to /pol/'s problems.
/mlpol/ may be too obscure to be completely overrun by bots and redditors, but a handful of reddit/Facebook phenotypes who are not deterred by the horse porn can shit the place up all the same, drive away contentfags, and generally make the board unpleasant and unproductive to use. It's important to be aware of that and not take site quality for granted.
>>392571
Do you have an actual counterargument?
>This place will have it's own struggles, but it is in no danger of turning out like /pol/
You should not assume that /mlpol/ is immune to /pol/'s problems.
/mlpol/ may be too obscure to be completely overrun by bots and redditors, but a handful of reddit/Facebook phenotypes who are not deterred by the horse porn can shit the place up all the same, drive away contentfags, and generally make the board unpleasant and unproductive to use. It's important to be aware of that and not take site quality for granted.
>>392571
Do you have an actual counterargument?
>>392571
Post something more convincing then social media screencaps if you want people to believe you.
Post something more convincing then social media screencaps if you want people to believe you.
>>392572
>You should not assume that /mlpol/ is immune to /pol/'s problems
Who's assuming? Maybe you haven't had the pleasure, but this site is operated and maintained by some of the most stalwart, right, and proper niggers I've ever had the chance to piss off and fuck with. If you think
>a handful of reddit/Facebook phenotypes
have any chance of degrading the site (other than shitting it up occasionally with gay-ass flat earth memes) then you are very silly.
>>392573
>>392574
>convince me
This mentality will avail you nothing. If you need 'convincing' at THIS stage in the game, maybe you're not ready for the 501 class? Maybe you should have studied?
>You should not assume that /mlpol/ is immune to /pol/'s problems
Who's assuming? Maybe you haven't had the pleasure, but this site is operated and maintained by some of the most stalwart, right, and proper niggers I've ever had the chance to piss off and fuck with. If you think
>a handful of reddit/Facebook phenotypes
have any chance of degrading the site (other than shitting it up occasionally with gay-ass flat earth memes) then you are very silly.
>>392573
>>392574
>convince me
This mentality will avail you nothing. If you need 'convincing' at THIS stage in the game, maybe you're not ready for the 501 class? Maybe you should have studied?
>>392577
>If you need 'convincing' at THIS stage in the game
If you post a claim, you should be ready to defend and support that claim under scrutiny. That's what arguments are all about. You want us to all bob our heads and clap like seals when you post "Nanobots, amirite, my fellow Q-pedes?", despite putting in zero effort to support your claim?
Don't just post random Facebook memes, and then act offended when people don't immediately believe you, or if they come to a separate conclusion after doing their own research.
>maybe you're not ready for the 501 class? Maybe you should have studied?
>YOU'RE NOT QUALIFIED TO DEBATE ME! EDUCATE YOURSELF!
This is the exact same arguments that midwit communists make when you ask them to defend their positions, and then they deflect and say that you can't argue with them because you haven't read some obscure socialist book from 70 years ago.
>have any chance of degrading the site
Yeah, they absolutely can. It happened to Ponychan, and it can happen to us too if we let it.
[Read more] >If you need 'convincing' at THIS stage in the game
If you post a claim, you should be ready to defend and support that claim under scrutiny. That's what arguments are all about. You want us to all bob our heads and clap like seals when you post "Nanobots, amirite, my fellow Q-pedes?", despite putting in zero effort to support your claim?
Don't just post random Facebook memes, and then act offended when people don't immediately believe you, or if they come to a separate conclusion after doing their own research.
>maybe you're not ready for the 501 class? Maybe you should have studied?
>YOU'RE NOT QUALIFIED TO DEBATE ME! EDUCATE YOURSELF!
This is the exact same arguments that midwit communists make when you ask them to defend their positions, and then they deflect and say that you can't argue with them because you haven't read some obscure socialist book from 70 years ago.
>have any chance of degrading the site
Yeah, they absolutely can. It happened to Ponychan, and it can happen to us too if we let it.
>>392577
>This mentality will avail you nothing. If you need 'convincing' at THIS stage in the game, maybe you're not ready for the 501 class? Maybe you should have studied?
IT'S NOT MY JOB TO EDUCATE YOU, CHUD!
>This mentality will avail you nothing. If you need 'convincing' at THIS stage in the game, maybe you're not ready for the 501 class? Maybe you should have studied?
IT'S NOT MY JOB TO EDUCATE YOU, CHUD!
>>392580
It is in fact not his job, but he shouldn't expect us to all agree with him if he's not willing to support his position.
Idk why he'd even post his position if he's not interested in persuading people.
It is in fact not his job, but he shouldn't expect us to all agree with him if he's not willing to support his position.
Idk why he'd even post his position if he's not interested in persuading people.
>>392582
Yes, I know. It's a classic midwit deflection. It's not exclusive to liberals though, as we can see here.
Yes, I know. It's a classic midwit deflection. It's not exclusive to liberals though, as we can see here.
>>392581
You think I expect agreement? LOL
>>392580
Yes, petulance has clearly worked, keep at it
>>392582
You presumed to be making fun, but you were actually illustrating how debased your mentality is. Good luck with that.
>>392583
You lot seem to think that throwing a tantrum will get you what you desire. Throwing a tantrum CAN work, but it's a very specific set of circumstances, and should not be considered the 'go-to' method.
You think I expect agreement? LOL
>>392580
Yes, petulance has clearly worked, keep at it
>>392582
You presumed to be making fun, but you were actually illustrating how debased your mentality is. Good luck with that.
>>392583
You lot seem to think that throwing a tantrum will get you what you desire. Throwing a tantrum CAN work, but it's a very specific set of circumstances, and should not be considered the 'go-to' method.
>>392586
If you want to be worth the effort, you'll need to do better than posture like a flat-earther
If you want to be worth the effort, you'll need to do better than posture like a flat-earther
>>392587
You're the one posturing. You have yet to back up your positions with anything better than social media screencaps. If you want to post twitter screencaps might I suggest 4chan?
You're the one posturing. You have yet to back up your positions with anything better than social media screencaps. If you want to post twitter screencaps might I suggest 4chan?
>>392571
>Stop questioning the anti-vaxx doctrine.
see the article >>391370 linked to. You have the uphill battle of people being skeptical of you as you push rhetoric that feds have used as a bioweapon in other counties and likely here. You are in agreement with many neoliberal conservative politicians with Heritage Foundation and Epstein file member ties. You are not the skeptic in this scenario.
>Stop questioning the anti-vaxx doctrine.
see the article >>391370 linked to. You have the uphill battle of people being skeptical of you as you push rhetoric that feds have used as a bioweapon in other counties and likely here. You are in agreement with many neoliberal conservative politicians with Heritage Foundation and Epstein file member ties. You are not the skeptic in this scenario.
>>392597
You wanna try that again? I'll link which posts ITT are mine, but its none of the ones you're talking about. Hint: Pinkie clown and the boop
You wanna try that again? I'll link which posts ITT are mine, but its none of the ones you're talking about. Hint: Pinkie clown and the boop
>>392611
Then why were you replying to us when we were talking to the other guy?
You're wasting our time.
Then why were you replying to us when we were talking to the other guy?
You're wasting our time.
>>392569
Your below provincial mindset is astonishing. Would you like to post in New York Times' comments section instead?
Your below provincial mindset is astonishing. Would you like to post in New York Times' comments section instead?
>>392573
>if you want people to believe you
Your entitled to disbelief and it is up to you what to do about it.
>if you want people to believe you
Your entitled to disbelief and it is up to you what to do about it.
>>392611
Yeah I had a feeling this was ninjaz.
>>392615
Notice how one side of the debate provides academic sources and tells the other side "you are wrong" when others disagree and the side of the debate the post social media screencaps and shout "YOU'RE A SHILL!" when others disagree. This is a political discussion forum only one of those sides is trying to have good faith discussion .
Yeah I had a feeling this was ninjaz.
>>392615
Notice how one side of the debate provides academic sources and tells the other side "you are wrong" when others disagree and the side of the debate the post social media screencaps and shout "YOU'RE A SHILL!" when others disagree. This is a political discussion forum only one of those sides is trying to have good faith discussion .
>>392617
It's simple; to try to make the opposing viewpoint stop talking. They don't want to be challenged.
It's simple; to try to make the opposing viewpoint stop talking. They don't want to be challenged.
>>392620
Wrong post.
Also, those sources are still more substantial than random social media screencaps, and instead of dismissing the sources outright you should read them and point out their mistakes and flaws.
Wrong post.
Also, those sources are still more substantial than random social media screencaps, and instead of dismissing the sources outright you should read them and point out their mistakes and flaws.
>>392618
>academic sources
Those have to be taken with a extra grain of salt. Fake science is widespread.
>academic sources
Those have to be taken with a extra grain of salt. Fake science is widespread.
>>392622
And you don't seem to get the point. The point is only one side of the debate is trying to have a discussion the other side is trying to make those having the discussion shut up.
And you don't seem to get the point. The point is only one side of the debate is trying to have a discussion the other side is trying to make those having the discussion shut up.
>>392618
>I had a feeling it was
Uh huh, that explains why you lied
>It was you who posted the Facebook memes without backing up your points
>I had a feeling it was
Uh huh, that explains why you lied
>It was you who posted the Facebook memes without backing up your points
>>392622
All sources require "salt," you have to read all things critically, and it's an insult to both yourself and the subject not to. Academic sources *want* you to be critical of them so they can be further refined.
All sources require "salt," you have to read all things critically, and it's an insult to both yourself and the subject not to. Academic sources *want* you to be critical of them so they can be further refined.
>>392632
>Academic sources *want* you to be critical of them
Not quite. The establishment already refused scrutiny with slogans like "the science is settled" and outright fleeing debate.
>Academic sources *want* you to be critical of them
Not quite. The establishment already refused scrutiny with slogans like "the science is settled" and outright fleeing debate.
>>392635
But it is strange to me how much you seem to hate academic sources, but you have absolutely zero problem with social media screenshots or blogs. It is certainly possible to put your thumb on the scale in academia, but it takes even less effort to make shit up on a blog or social media.
But it is strange to me how much you seem to hate academic sources, but you have absolutely zero problem with social media screenshots or blogs. It is certainly possible to put your thumb on the scale in academia, but it takes even less effort to make shit up on a blog or social media.
>>392638
You are literally getting upset because people are asking for better sources than social media posts and blogs.
You are literally getting upset because people are asking for better sources than social media posts and blogs.
>>392641
>people are asking for better sources
Peer reviewed, settled science, consensus, are all buzzterms meaning TRUST US, we know and are better than you and you should have faith on us. Like a religion.
>people are asking for better sources
Peer reviewed, settled science, consensus, are all buzzterms meaning TRUST US, we know and are better than you and you should have faith on us. Like a religion.
>>392642
I can trust science if things based off of the science work. You act as if something posted in an academic journal must 100% be a lie. That's just silly. I act as if random blogs and social media are unreliable because they are. At least the academic sources have some prosses to filter out bullshit even if that process is not perfect. There is no bullshit filter on blogs or social media.
I can trust science if things based off of the science work. You act as if something posted in an academic journal must 100% be a lie. That's just silly. I act as if random blogs and social media are unreliable because they are. At least the academic sources have some prosses to filter out bullshit even if that process is not perfect. There is no bullshit filter on blogs or social media.
>>392642
And on top of that people are right to ask for evidence of huge claims like "a shot from almost 5 years ago is depopulating the planet" I have a big family and several coworkers who took it. Most of them are shitlibs so they got several boosters too. No one I know had problems and I still have to deal with traffic every day. I don't see bodies on the streets. So yeah the claim that a shot from years ago is causing the world to end is going to require better evidence then "some dickhead on social media/random blog said so"
And on top of that people are right to ask for evidence of huge claims like "a shot from almost 5 years ago is depopulating the planet" I have a big family and several coworkers who took it. Most of them are shitlibs so they got several boosters too. No one I know had problems and I still have to deal with traffic every day. I don't see bodies on the streets. So yeah the claim that a shot from years ago is causing the world to end is going to require better evidence then "some dickhead on social media/random blog said so"
>>392643
>At least the academic sources have some prosses to filter out bullshit
Sure, I don't argue that. However, academics are reliant on funding, that means that any meaningful deviation from mainstream science will be quickly squashed. Blogs are independent, take mainstream science and rip it apart. If that is deconstruction just for the sake of it, the blog will go into oblivion, otherwise, the new thesis will be reblogged and refined to reach the experimental phase.
>At least the academic sources have some prosses to filter out bullshit
Sure, I don't argue that. However, academics are reliant on funding, that means that any meaningful deviation from mainstream science will be quickly squashed. Blogs are independent, take mainstream science and rip it apart. If that is deconstruction just for the sake of it, the blog will go into oblivion, otherwise, the new thesis will be reblogged and refined to reach the experimental phase.
>>392644
>to ask for evidence of huge claims like "a shot from almost 5 years ago is depopulating the planet
The fact is the one of the main manufacturers and promoters was Bill Gates, who has generously talked about depopulation together with his billionaires pals.
>to ask for evidence of huge claims like "a shot from almost 5 years ago is depopulating the planet
The fact is the one of the main manufacturers and promoters was Bill Gates, who has generously talked about depopulation together with his billionaires pals.
>>392648
Again, judge a source by the evidence they present.
And also, blogs are not necessarily"independent" either. They rely on sensationalism and engagement farming to stay relevant, which means they'll say anything to keep your attention.
You only get to see whatever Zuckerberg and Musk's algorithms permit you to see. Notice how on Facebook you get to talk about 5G nanobots all you want, but if you deny the Holocaust you get banned immediately? It's because they permit you to talk about the former.
Again, judge a source by the evidence they present.
And also, blogs are not necessarily"independent" either. They rely on sensationalism and engagement farming to stay relevant, which means they'll say anything to keep your attention.
You only get to see whatever Zuckerberg and Musk's algorithms permit you to see. Notice how on Facebook you get to talk about 5G nanobots all you want, but if you deny the Holocaust you get banned immediately? It's because they permit you to talk about the former.
>>392633
>THE^tm establishment
>"the science is settled"
Spectaclebabble. You are forfiting your ability to participate in academics as a process over to twitter debate addicts and Heritage Foundation owned thinktanks that can't nor are interested in doing it right.
1. Make a website
2. write your paper on the subject you have interest
3. find peers to review it
4. revise it
5. repeat 3 and 4 until it doesn't suck
6. publish it to said website
There are several free means of getting a website such as neocities, and self hosting isn't that hard expensive but the availability of the former option makes that a non-barrier, so don't hide behind that.
Pandoc lets you convert markdown to html so you don't even need to know how to code HTML, nor is HTML hard, and knowing every semantic HTML tag will make you a better writer so learn it anyway.
[Read more] >THE^tm establishment
>"the science is settled"
Spectaclebabble. You are forfiting your ability to participate in academics as a process over to twitter debate addicts and Heritage Foundation owned thinktanks that can't nor are interested in doing it right.
1. Make a website
2. write your paper on the subject you have interest
3. find peers to review it
4. revise it
5. repeat 3 and 4 until it doesn't suck
6. publish it to said website
There are several free means of getting a website such as neocities, and self hosting isn't that hard expensive but the availability of the former option makes that a non-barrier, so don't hide behind that.
Pandoc lets you convert markdown to html so you don't even need to know how to code HTML, nor is HTML hard, and knowing every semantic HTML tag will make you a better writer so learn it anyway.
>>392650
>They rely on sensationalism and engagement farming to stay relevant
As well with academics, as they rely on "outcomes" to get funded.
>They rely on sensationalism and engagement farming to stay relevant
As well with academics, as they rely on "outcomes" to get funded.
>>392645
>Blogs are independent, take mainstream science and rip it apart.
But they are randos who will say anything. What wins is not the scientific method on blogs, but what gets the most hits. And many of them are not independent. Look at the vigilant fox for example, who is paid to promote herbal "cancer treatments" or Alex Jones who makes most of his money from supplements.
https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/exclusive-cancer-secrets-revealed
https://www.infowarsstore.com/
>Blogs are independent, take mainstream science and rip it apart.
But they are randos who will say anything. What wins is not the scientific method on blogs, but what gets the most hits. And many of them are not independent. Look at the vigilant fox for example, who is paid to promote herbal "cancer treatments" or Alex Jones who makes most of his money from supplements.
https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/exclusive-cancer-secrets-revealed
https://www.infowarsstore.com/
>>392649
We can agree that Bill Gates is a twisted, evil fuck that wants to kill off humanity, but that doesn't mean he's successfully done it (yet). That simply isn't evidence.
If anything, the vaccine was probably more of a test trial to see if feat could motivate people to take experimental injections en mass.
We can agree that Bill Gates is a twisted, evil fuck that wants to kill off humanity, but that doesn't mean he's successfully done it (yet). That simply isn't evidence.
If anything, the vaccine was probably more of a test trial to see if feat could motivate people to take experimental injections en mass.
>>392649
>The fact is the one of the main manufacturers and promoters was Bill Gates
Bill Gates said that vaccines are good and the world has too many people so that means there is a secret plan to depopulate the planet with mRNA? That is retarded.
>The fact is the one of the main manufacturers and promoters was Bill Gates
Bill Gates said that vaccines are good and the world has too many people so that means there is a secret plan to depopulate the planet with mRNA? That is retarded.
>>392653
>but what gets the most hits
Is your goal profit or science? The two can rarely be reconciled. If the science matters to you then stop letting academia become centralized entity. The whole point of the internet was to decentralize this shit.
>but what gets the most hits
Is your goal profit or science? The two can rarely be reconciled. If the science matters to you then stop letting academia become centralized entity. The whole point of the internet was to decentralize this shit.
>>392654
>That simply isn't evidence.
Well, if my neighbor buys poison and talks about my neighborhood being too crowded, I would be worried. Sure, there is not evidence of him being a poisoner, but there is not evidence on the contrary either.
>That simply isn't evidence.
Well, if my neighbor buys poison and talks about my neighborhood being too crowded, I would be worried. Sure, there is not evidence of him being a poisoner, but there is not evidence on the contrary either.
>>392654
I hate Bill Gates because he monopolized his shit software and kikerosoft tries to force you to use it, but I don't think he is trying to end humanity. Just a shitstain who profits off of enshittification.
>If anything, the vaccine was probably more of a test trial to see if feat could motivate people to take experimental injections en mass.
Given all of the different tech that was tested all over the world this is more plausible. Still my personal belief is that governments simply overreacted to a lab leak and used the opportunity to test new technologies.
I hate Bill Gates because he monopolized his shit software and kikerosoft tries to force you to use it, but I don't think he is trying to end humanity. Just a shitstain who profits off of enshittification.
>If anything, the vaccine was probably more of a test trial to see if feat could motivate people to take experimental injections en mass.
Given all of the different tech that was tested all over the world this is more plausible. Still my personal belief is that governments simply overreacted to a lab leak and used the opportunity to test new technologies.
>>392652
You don't have to believe in academics if you don't want to, but at least post something more substantial than random social media screencaps.
>>392651
>You are forfiting your ability to participate in academics as a process
This is a very good point.
>>392657
First you would need to find evidence of the poison depopulating the world.
>>392656
>Is your goal profit or science? The two can rarely be reconciled.
Profit motivates science all the time. Corporations want research that produces actual results, not just propaganda. If anything, profit is what keeps academia in line.
You don't have to believe in academics if you don't want to, but at least post something more substantial than random social media screencaps.
>>392651
>You are forfiting your ability to participate in academics as a process
This is a very good point.
>>392657
First you would need to find evidence of the poison depopulating the world.
>>392656
>Is your goal profit or science? The two can rarely be reconciled.
Profit motivates science all the time. Corporations want research that produces actual results, not just propaganda. If anything, profit is what keeps academia in line.
>>392656
I do not like the centralization, I do have problems with journals and that probably deserves a thread. Academia having problems does not mean random blogs or social media are credible.
>>392659
>Bill Gates likes vaccines and said the world has too many people. That means he will kill us all with mRNA.
Yeah that sounds like something that somebody with an IQ of 70 would come up with.
I do not like the centralization, I do have problems with journals and that probably deserves a thread. Academia having problems does not mean random blogs or social media are credible.
>>392659
>Bill Gates likes vaccines and said the world has too many people. That means he will kill us all with mRNA.
Yeah that sounds like something that somebody with an IQ of 70 would come up with.
>>392662
By the people who want research that produces profitable products, technologies, data and methodology.
>>392664
>I do not like the centralization, I do have problems with journals and that probably deserves a thread. Academia having problems does not mean random blogs or social media are credible.
This.
By the people who want research that produces profitable products, technologies, data and methodology.
>>392664
>I do not like the centralization, I do have problems with journals and that probably deserves a thread. Academia having problems does not mean random blogs or social media are credible.
This.
>>392666
>By the people who want research that produces profitable products, technologies, data and methodology.
Exactly, let those people fill their pockets. And let people walking the opposite sidewalk continue their research.
>By the people who want research that produces profitable products, technologies, data and methodology.
Exactly, let those people fill their pockets. And let people walking the opposite sidewalk continue their research.
>>392660
Science can be fueled by money, autism, or both. Often both, but when there's no money for somthing you know is important then the latter should be plenty. A lot of early internet academics was volenteer stuff, and that never stopped, it's just not search engine optimal. Search engines will die soon with the whole AI thing, so in the new age of manual indexing that will be as much a non-issue as the prior age of manual indexing.
>>392664
A peer reviewed paper is a peer reviewed paper. Don't let authority overtake the scientific process itself.
Science can be fueled by money, autism, or both. Often both, but when there's no money for somthing you know is important then the latter should be plenty. A lot of early internet academics was volenteer stuff, and that never stopped, it's just not search engine optimal. Search engines will die soon with the whole AI thing, so in the new age of manual indexing that will be as much a non-issue as the prior age of manual indexing.
>>392664
A peer reviewed paper is a peer reviewed paper. Don't let authority overtake the scientific process itself.
>>392668
I notice you aren't posting any research. You are posting screenshots on social media and the opinions of literally whos.
I notice you aren't posting any research. You are posting screenshots on social media and the opinions of literally whos.
>>392670
I actually think there should be some degree of oversight. Look at India which has the exact opposite of the western problem where journals are expensive to access and publish in. Indian scientists just publish bullshit in predatory journals and nothing can trusted. What science really needs is an institution dedicated to replication studies, but how to make that institution I am not sure.
I actually think there should be some degree of oversight. Look at India which has the exact opposite of the western problem where journals are expensive to access and publish in. Indian scientists just publish bullshit in predatory journals and nothing can trusted. What science really needs is an institution dedicated to replication studies, but how to make that institution I am not sure.
>>392673
>Indian scientists just publish bullshit in predatory journals and nothing can trusted.
You have a very valid point on shitskins. But Whites doing scrutiny are not in the same boat.
>Indian scientists just publish bullshit in predatory journals and nothing can trusted.
You have a very valid point on shitskins. But Whites doing scrutiny are not in the same boat.
>>392673
Something like wikipedia would do it. Perhaps not wikipedia itself, it's dealing with scope creep and might be better done with a federated model. That said, wikis are generally good for this sort of oversight when they have rules as thourough as wikipedia's.
Something like wikipedia would do it. Perhaps not wikipedia itself, it's dealing with scope creep and might be better done with a federated model. That said, wikis are generally good for this sort of oversight when they have rules as thourough as wikipedia's.
>>392672
Oh it seems I am. Looks like you posted a study done in rats and tried to pass that off as solid proof of depopulation >>391377 see I notice this is a pattern among antivaxxers. Like you will post a rat study, or an unreplicated cancer cell culture study, or study with 13 people where the control group is N=3 and then in the next breath you will bitch about the replication crisis without realizing the irony.
Oh it seems I am. Looks like you posted a study done in rats and tried to pass that off as solid proof of depopulation >>391377 see I notice this is a pattern among antivaxxers. Like you will post a rat study, or an unreplicated cancer cell culture study, or study with 13 people where the control group is N=3 and then in the next breath you will bitch about the replication crisis without realizing the irony.
>>392675
The instution would need funding and how do you make funding replication studies profitable?
The instution would need funding and how do you make funding replication studies profitable?
>>392679
On top of this it would need to heavily incentivize scientists. No one ever became famous for being the second person to discover something.
On top of this it would need to heavily incentivize scientists. No one ever became famous for being the second person to discover something.
>>392681
I'm whatever word you want to use for people who think the depopulation narrative is retarded.
I'm whatever word you want to use for people who think the depopulation narrative is retarded.
>>392682
>depopulation narrative
Spelled it out by Bill Gates himself and billionaires pals, I remind you.
>depopulation narrative
Spelled it out by Bill Gates himself and billionaires pals, I remind you.
>>392681
And you seem to be deliberately avoiding the point. The study you posted was a rat study and over 90% of those studies are not translatable to humans and can be difficult to replicate (although not as difficult as something like cancer cell culture studies)
And you seem to be deliberately avoiding the point. The study you posted was a rat study and over 90% of those studies are not translatable to humans and can be difficult to replicate (although not as difficult as something like cancer cell culture studies)
This thread passed the bump limit.
>>392683
No you made a jump that bill gates is part of some greater conspiracy because he likes vaccines and is worried about overpopulation. You offered no solid evidence that this conspiracy exists.
No you made a jump that bill gates is part of some greater conspiracy because he likes vaccines and is worried about overpopulation. You offered no solid evidence that this conspiracy exists.
>>392685
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11175415/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36883244/
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2746847/
The failure for animal studies to translate to humans has been known about for a long time.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11175415/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36883244/
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2746847/
The failure for animal studies to translate to humans has been known about for a long time.
>>392688
No it's a jump. The dude worried about over population and most elites started worrying about depopulation a while back and the dude likes vaccines. That doesn't point to a global conspiracy to depopulate the planet with mRNA.
No it's a jump. The dude worried about over population and most elites started worrying about depopulation a while back and the dude likes vaccines. That doesn't point to a global conspiracy to depopulate the planet with mRNA.
>>392690
Look I linked a biology textbook in this thread. It is a good entry level book. Has lots of great information and it was written before covid. Give it a read. You might actually find it interesting and it would at least help you determine if the papers you read are good or not.
Look I linked a biology textbook in this thread. It is a good entry level book. Has lots of great information and it was written before covid. Give it a read. You might actually find it interesting and it would at least help you determine if the papers you read are good or not.
>>392692
Fair enough. However I'm well above a biology book. Let me explain to you a mammal body in lay terms, It is basically a boiler, fuel goes in and exhaust residue goes out and you have a useful product transformed into physical movement and brain activity.
Fair enough. However I'm well above a biology book. Let me explain to you a mammal body in lay terms, It is basically a boiler, fuel goes in and exhaust residue goes out and you have a useful product transformed into physical movement and brain activity.
>>392693
I honestly don't think you are above an entry level book. You didn't know that animal studies are poorly translated to humans. That is pretty basic knowledge in the field. Give it a read there is lots to learn.
I honestly don't think you are above an entry level book. You didn't know that animal studies are poorly translated to humans. That is pretty basic knowledge in the field. Give it a read there is lots to learn.
>>392695
And how might 80 million years worth of evolution might have lead to differences between humans and mice?
And how might 80 million years worth of evolution might have lead to differences between humans and mice?
>>392696
>80 million years worth of evolution
Well, we have veeeeeeeeery divergent views here.
First of all, carbon dating is so unreliable that it is almost a fraud.
Second, Evolution is just a theory and can't be used as proof.
>80 million years worth of evolution
Well, we have veeeeeeeeery divergent views here.
First of all, carbon dating is so unreliable that it is almost a fraud.
Second, Evolution is just a theory and can't be used as proof.
>>392697
>carbon dating is unreliable
Carbon dating is not the only dating used. Potassium argon dating for example is much more accurate for older samples.
>just a theory.
That word doesn't mean what you think it means. It means there is a lot of research backing it up. Electromagnetism, gravity, and cell theory are all "just theories" I somehow doubt you have a problem with any of those. There is lots of evidence for evolution even aside from the fossil record. Look at chromosome 2 for example or the many similarities that mitochondria and chloroplasts have with bacteria.
>carbon dating is unreliable
Carbon dating is not the only dating used. Potassium argon dating for example is much more accurate for older samples.
>just a theory.
That word doesn't mean what you think it means. It means there is a lot of research backing it up. Electromagnetism, gravity, and cell theory are all "just theories" I somehow doubt you have a problem with any of those. There is lots of evidence for evolution even aside from the fossil record. Look at chromosome 2 for example or the many similarities that mitochondria and chloroplasts have with bacteria.
>>392697
But I think I finally understand why you get so upset when others deny your satanic conspiracy, because the satanic conspiracy is supposed to tie in with the rapture. You dislike science because most scientists agree with evolution and trying to learn why the believe that may force you to evaluate your beliefs. The evidence for evolution is pretty strong and evolution would destroy the orgin story of the bible and invalidate the whole thing. The covid vax depopulation shit came later. Evolution is what your distaste for science is about. When you call people who disagree with your religion shills you are not doing so because you believe they are government agents you do so because you believe the views they express will damn others to hell and the very expression of those beliefs is harmful. Stop using the word shill when the word you are looking for is heretic.
But I think I finally understand why you get so upset when others deny your satanic conspiracy, because the satanic conspiracy is supposed to tie in with the rapture. You dislike science because most scientists agree with evolution and trying to learn why the believe that may force you to evaluate your beliefs. The evidence for evolution is pretty strong and evolution would destroy the orgin story of the bible and invalidate the whole thing. The covid vax depopulation shit came later. Evolution is what your distaste for science is about. When you call people who disagree with your religion shills you are not doing so because you believe they are government agents you do so because you believe the views they express will damn others to hell and the very expression of those beliefs is harmful. Stop using the word shill when the word you are looking for is heretic.
>>392698
>gravity
No serious scientist knows what the fuck it is, tbh.
>There is lots of evidence for evolution
Make a search here for "Don Patton". This guy is an archeologist, scholar, and knows a lot about rocks and paleontology. There are videos of him debating evolutionist professors (aka shysters) and publicly shame them for being utter charlatans.
>gravity
No serious scientist knows what the fuck it is, tbh.
>There is lots of evidence for evolution
Make a search here for "Don Patton". This guy is an archeologist, scholar, and knows a lot about rocks and paleontology. There are videos of him debating evolutionist professors (aka shysters) and publicly shame them for being utter charlatans.
>>392679
>The instution would need funding
Federation can minimize that cost considerably
>how do you make funding replication studies profitable?
Maintained and profitable are two different things
>The instution would need funding
Federation can minimize that cost considerably
>how do you make funding replication studies profitable?
Maintained and profitable are two different things
>>392700
>because the satanic conspiracy is supposed to tie in with the rapture.
WTF
I'm an ancient Pagan, fren.
>because the satanic conspiracy is supposed to tie in with the rapture.
WTF
I'm an ancient Pagan, fren.
>>392701
Fair point on gravity, but it isn't really disputed that the phenomenon exists.
An archeologist might not be the best person to ask about genetics and I looked him up and didn't find anything about chromosome 2 or the similarities between mitochondria and chloroplasts and bacteria.
Fair point on gravity, but it isn't really disputed that the phenomenon exists.
An archeologist might not be the best person to ask about genetics and I looked him up and didn't find anything about chromosome 2 or the similarities between mitochondria and chloroplasts and bacteria.
>>392698
>>392700
See >>>/vx/158082 → →
Don Patton is a hardcore christian, however from a scientist point of view (not religion is needed), he destroys the Evolution nonsense.
>>392700
See >>>/vx/158082 → →
Don Patton is a hardcore christian, however from a scientist point of view (not religion is needed), he destroys the Evolution nonsense.
>>392702
I'll make a thread on peer review and journals tomorrow. It's more than just funding that would need to change. The "publish or perish" attitude would need to change too.
>>392704
I didn't think there were people who seriously believed paganism stuff. The pagans I met were secular and believed the gods and stories were metaphors for human behavior. Also why link me to a christian creation scientist?
I'll make a thread on peer review and journals tomorrow. It's more than just funding that would need to change. The "publish or perish" attitude would need to change too.
>>392704
I didn't think there were people who seriously believed paganism stuff. The pagans I met were secular and believed the gods and stories were metaphors for human behavior. Also why link me to a christian creation scientist?
>>392708
>Also why link me to a christian creation scientist?
Because the uses science and only science to debunk Evolution. No religion needed.
>Also why link me to a christian creation scientist?
Because the uses science and only science to debunk Evolution. No religion needed.
>>392708
>The pagans I met were secular and believed the gods and stories were metaphors for human behavior.
I'm secular, however I know about the other side, call it the occult if you wish.
>The pagans I met were secular and believed the gods and stories were metaphors for human behavior.
I'm secular, however I know about the other side, call it the occult if you wish.
>>392710
So some red flags about this guy jump out at me. 1 his PhD is in education not geology or archeology, two he is affiliated with the creation evidence museum in Glen rose TX and their research is so bad that even other creationists call their work garbage.
So some red flags about this guy jump out at me. 1 his PhD is in education not geology or archeology, two he is affiliated with the creation evidence museum in Glen rose TX and their research is so bad that even other creationists call their work garbage.
>>392714
Dude, just watch the public debates with evolutionist "scholar" professors, and get some popcorn.
Dude, just watch the public debates with evolutionist "scholar" professors, and get some popcorn.
>>392716
I don't want to watch hours worth of this dude's lectures or cherry picked video clips. Give me evidence that other forms of dating like potassium argon dating or thorium uranium dating are inaccurate or how the telomere sequence in chromosome 2 got there without a fusion or explain the circular chromosomes and 70s ribosomes in chloroplasts and mitochondria without endosymbiont.
I don't want to watch hours worth of this dude's lectures or cherry picked video clips. Give me evidence that other forms of dating like potassium argon dating or thorium uranium dating are inaccurate or how the telomere sequence in chromosome 2 got there without a fusion or explain the circular chromosomes and 70s ribosomes in chloroplasts and mitochondria without endosymbiont.
>>392705
Gravity isnt a force my guy. The heliocentric religion says so. Cant believe ponybros are so hostile to flat earthers when we just correct you on your religion lol.
Gravity isnt a force my guy. The heliocentric religion says so. Cant believe ponybros are so hostile to flat earthers when we just correct you on your religion lol.
>>392634
"Peer review" isn't even science it's just an authoritative marker. It actually hinders scientific progress. Science is about verifiable cause and effect, replication, and predictive validity. If it isn't that it isn't science. If we understand what science is then we understand what science isn't
Yes virology is a satanic scam and the bible is true. That is the metaphysical take I have on it. Doesn't change it also being unverfiable pseudoscience. No human has ever died from a virus or germ. All inventions of vaccines were made to cause illness and death. Stuff like the black plauge, polio, and chicken/small pox are all immunity responses, they are not contagious. Why do people in close proximity seem to get the same illnesses? They are consuming the same toxins that's why. No need to beat a conspiracy theory dead horse though, you could've just watched a conspiracy video instead of relying on muh scienceTM paper abstracts. Seriously, a random conspiracy documentary will likely hold more truth than academia scams. Funny how you accuse people like us of being Facebook boomer memers when most of Facebook and social media is just like you. Very interesting
"Peer review" isn't even science it's just an authoritative marker. It actually hinders scientific progress. Science is about verifiable cause and effect, replication, and predictive validity. If it isn't that it isn't science. If we understand what science is then we understand what science isn't
Yes virology is a satanic scam and the bible is true. That is the metaphysical take I have on it. Doesn't change it also being unverfiable pseudoscience. No human has ever died from a virus or germ. All inventions of vaccines were made to cause illness and death. Stuff like the black plauge, polio, and chicken/small pox are all immunity responses, they are not contagious. Why do people in close proximity seem to get the same illnesses? They are consuming the same toxins that's why. No need to beat a conspiracy theory dead horse though, you could've just watched a conspiracy video instead of relying on muh scienceTM paper abstracts. Seriously, a random conspiracy documentary will likely hold more truth than academia scams. Funny how you accuse people like us of being Facebook boomer memers when most of Facebook and social media is just like you. Very interesting
>>392732
Most of the government is just a job and task. Most of the government arent "in on the lies" they just believe the lies without understanding. Boiling it down to being "the government" would be dishonest, because there are higher ups in the government called secret societies
Most of the government is just a job and task. Most of the government arent "in on the lies" they just believe the lies without understanding. Boiling it down to being "the government" would be dishonest, because there are higher ups in the government called secret societies
Don't stop, I'm enthralled, but holy shit is this some schizophrenia.
>>392741
I don't think there are any secret societies that powerful. I don't think the world is controlled by a united secret group at all. I think the world is simply controlled by a few factions of rich assholes fighting for control and fucking everyone else in the process.
I don't think there are any secret societies that powerful. I don't think the world is controlled by a united secret group at all. I think the world is simply controlled by a few factions of rich assholes fighting for control and fucking everyone else in the process.
>>392744
>they're not secret societies they're just rich factions
Yeah, which operate in exclusion and secrecy. You cant be this retarded to make this distinction about them being a "faction" I don't buy it. It's the same thing
>they're not secret societies they're just rich factions
Yeah, which operate in exclusion and secrecy. You cant be this retarded to make this distinction about them being a "faction" I don't buy it. It's the same thing
>>392745
Several competing factions with different interests and I don't think those factions are necessarily secret societies. The coal giants have very different interests from the green tech giants. I certainly don't believe that either of those factions control all the media, politics, history books, and scientific journals. They can certainly purchase influence, but neither control the world.
Several competing factions with different interests and I don't think those factions are necessarily secret societies. The coal giants have very different interests from the green tech giants. I certainly don't believe that either of those factions control all the media, politics, history books, and scientific journals. They can certainly purchase influence, but neither control the world.
>>392746
No one said anything about them "controlling the world". Environmentalism is a scam and the people at the top pushing it know it is.
Someone's gotta run the coal industry, and nothing wrong with that. Not every industry has to be controlled by one secret society group that's a ridiculous strawman. Secret societies just need to operate in influence, they'll do that with whatever sector works best for them
No one said anything about them "controlling the world". Environmentalism is a scam and the people at the top pushing it know it is.
Someone's gotta run the coal industry, and nothing wrong with that. Not every industry has to be controlled by one secret society group that's a ridiculous strawman. Secret societies just need to operate in influence, they'll do that with whatever sector works best for them
>>392747
Help me understand your position then. How does this secret society (societies?) operate? How powerful are they? Why do they do what they do? How many are there? What evidence do you have of their existence?
Help me understand your position then. How does this secret society (societies?) operate? How powerful are they? Why do they do what they do? How many are there? What evidence do you have of their existence?
>>392747
And you say this society doesn't control the world but a secret society able to convince the world of the shape of the earth, evolution, germ theory, all of our history, ect has to be pretty powerful. To me that sounds like nearly Descartes' demon levels of power.
And you say this society doesn't control the world but a secret society able to convince the world of the shape of the earth, evolution, germ theory, all of our history, ect has to be pretty powerful. To me that sounds like nearly Descartes' demon levels of power.
>>392749
These are all begging the questions. There's clear evidence of billionaires doing secret handshakes, having parties on their yachts and in their mansions and hotels. They fly private jets to have political meetings. You really think they're doing all this just to have a toast? Clearly they are planning events and ways to serve their own interests. Use your brain
>>392750
"Controlling the world" is literally a blanket statement. Define what you mean by control the world first. It's also begging the question and appealing to popularity by saying "how do they trick most of the worlds population?"
Most people are lost and not taught how to think. Same shit as asking why so many believe the holocaust happened and 911 was done by muslims
These are all begging the questions. There's clear evidence of billionaires doing secret handshakes, having parties on their yachts and in their mansions and hotels. They fly private jets to have political meetings. You really think they're doing all this just to have a toast? Clearly they are planning events and ways to serve their own interests. Use your brain
>>392750
"Controlling the world" is literally a blanket statement. Define what you mean by control the world first. It's also begging the question and appealing to popularity by saying "how do they trick most of the worlds population?"
Most people are lost and not taught how to think. Same shit as asking why so many believe the holocaust happened and 911 was done by muslims
>>392752
Those questions were asked to try to understand your position. They are not gotchas in any way.
>Clearly they are planning events and ways to serve their own interests
Simple money laundering and corruption could easily explain this.
By control the world I mean how do they direct politics, geopolitics, control all major information, and direct major events? How does all that work?
Those questions were asked to try to understand your position. They are not gotchas in any way.
>Clearly they are planning events and ways to serve their own interests
Simple money laundering and corruption could easily explain this.
By control the world I mean how do they direct politics, geopolitics, control all major information, and direct major events? How does all that work?
>>392753
Define what you mean by major information and major events. Who ever said they are controlling them all? Seems like you're building more strawmans in your head
You're on a very niche pony image board and you want me to spoonfeed on how billionaires have and use their leverage in politics, lol. Convince me you aren't an absolute shill here to waste time
Define what you mean by major information and major events. Who ever said they are controlling them all? Seems like you're building more strawmans in your head
You're on a very niche pony image board and you want me to spoonfeed on how billionaires have and use their leverage in politics, lol. Convince me you aren't an absolute shill here to waste time
>>392752
>There's clear evidence of billionaires doing secret handshakes
And secret handshakes do not imply nefarious activity. I almost joined a fraternity in uni and they had secret handshakes. Pretty sure those guys were getting drunk and sharing test banks not taking over the world.
>There's clear evidence of billionaires doing secret handshakes
And secret handshakes do not imply nefarious activity. I almost joined a fraternity in uni and they had secret handshakes. Pretty sure those guys were getting drunk and sharing test banks not taking over the world.
>>392754
How do they control enough of the information infrastructure to where they can fool the overwhelming majority of the population about things as basic as the shape of the earth or the very fundamentals of medicine? How does that work? What part of this question is unclear to you?
How do they control enough of the information infrastructure to where they can fool the overwhelming majority of the population about things as basic as the shape of the earth or the very fundamentals of medicine? How does that work? What part of this question is unclear to you?
>>392756
Again, same shit as asking why so many people believe the Holocaust happened and that 911 was done by Muslims extremists
How do you even begin determine earth's "shape"? Flat earthers make a claim about the earth being flat. Flat is not a shape it's a discription of a surface. Where did you get "shape" from?
As far as medicine goes, people have dropped dead due to vaccines. That puts medicine at question, and it doesn't matter how many fools continue to buy that vaccines are a safe and effective medicine
Again, same shit as asking why so many people believe the Holocaust happened and that 911 was done by Muslims extremists
How do you even begin determine earth's "shape"? Flat earthers make a claim about the earth being flat. Flat is not a shape it's a discription of a surface. Where did you get "shape" from?
As far as medicine goes, people have dropped dead due to vaccines. That puts medicine at question, and it doesn't matter how many fools continue to buy that vaccines are a safe and effective medicine
>>392757
Honestly I can see how they could spin typhus and starvation into gas and ovens especially since the former would call into question the legitimacy of the post war wolrd order. As for 9/11 the planes were flown by Muslims but financed by Saudis and Jews. Convincing people that it was Muslims is simply a half truth. Germ theory on the other hand has a whole bunch of medicines that work based on those principles and a bunch of people researching and manufacturing those methods that seems a lot harder to fake simply because of the amount of people involved. The holocaust only needs a few media companies and Intel agencies to be involved same with 9/11. The germ theory denial and flat earth shit requires average jackoffs to be a part of the conspiracy.
Honestly I can see how they could spin typhus and starvation into gas and ovens especially since the former would call into question the legitimacy of the post war wolrd order. As for 9/11 the planes were flown by Muslims but financed by Saudis and Jews. Convincing people that it was Muslims is simply a half truth. Germ theory on the other hand has a whole bunch of medicines that work based on those principles and a bunch of people researching and manufacturing those methods that seems a lot harder to fake simply because of the amount of people involved. The holocaust only needs a few media companies and Intel agencies to be involved same with 9/11. The germ theory denial and flat earth shit requires average jackoffs to be a part of the conspiracy.
>>392758
Sorry but a 3rd grader can do the math and figure out you can't bake 6 million cookies in 4 years. You need to do about 3000-4000 cookies per day which requires too many overns. There's no genius trickery going on here, people are just fucking retards and buy stories.
There were no planes on 911 my guy. So no Muslims flew any planes into buildings. Israelis coordinated camera footage from different angles because they knew what was coming. Then they inserted CGI planes into their footages and gave them to the media.
Can you name one single useful medicine that does any good? Unless it's a specific thing that is used to prevent an infection, they seem to be all reliefs, not cures. Average healthy humans simply don't need medicine at any time in their life unless they need to stop an infection or something. Eating and drinking healthy is simply enough and every sane person wants to avoid seeing doctors and nurses
Again, "average jackoffs" don't need to be part of any conspiracy, they just need to take orders and believe in the lie. There's nothing that's suggests that millions would have to "be in on it"
Sorry but a 3rd grader can do the math and figure out you can't bake 6 million cookies in 4 years. You need to do about 3000-4000 cookies per day which requires too many overns. There's no genius trickery going on here, people are just fucking retards and buy stories.
There were no planes on 911 my guy. So no Muslims flew any planes into buildings. Israelis coordinated camera footage from different angles because they knew what was coming. Then they inserted CGI planes into their footages and gave them to the media.
Can you name one single useful medicine that does any good? Unless it's a specific thing that is used to prevent an infection, they seem to be all reliefs, not cures. Average healthy humans simply don't need medicine at any time in their life unless they need to stop an infection or something. Eating and drinking healthy is simply enough and every sane person wants to avoid seeing doctors and nurses
Again, "average jackoffs" don't need to be part of any conspiracy, they just need to take orders and believe in the lie. There's nothing that's suggests that millions would have to "be in on it"
>>392760
You're giving him an awful lot of credit, assuming he's both capable and willing to engage in 3rd-grade math
You're giving him an awful lot of credit, assuming he's both capable and willing to engage in 3rd-grade math
>>392760
>Then they inserted CGI planes into their footages and gave them to the media.
So all the people who saw it in new york are just lying?
>Can you name one single useful medicine that does any good?
Antibiotics
Antiretrovirals
Monoclonal antibodies
Oh and lithium. If you aren't familiar with that one you should probably make yourself familiar with that one.
>Again, "average jackoffs" don't need to be part of any conspiracy, they just need to take orders and believe in the lie. There's nothing that's suggests that millions would have to "be in on it"
Yeah actually they would be. Snipers and artillery units need to calculate for the curvature of the earth in their shots. Engineers building radio towers need to account for line of sight. Pilots and ship captains need to use the round earth model for navigation, ect.
And then let's look at medicine. I used to work in pharmaceuticals specifically on antibodies. We had clean rooms and all kinds of tests for contaminates especially bacteria and virus because those could destroy the cell cultures. You're telling me all the people doing those tests were in on it? It wasn't as simple as "red means bad" they had to test for biochemical signatures of the contaminates so they contaminates could be contained. Those people who have to be in on it as would the people who designed the equipment to test for it and, the people who designed the facility the people prescribing the medication, ect
>>392761
Join him on the flat earth side ninjaz, you are already so close.
[Read more] >Then they inserted CGI planes into their footages and gave them to the media.
So all the people who saw it in new york are just lying?
>Can you name one single useful medicine that does any good?
Antibiotics
Antiretrovirals
Monoclonal antibodies
Oh and lithium. If you aren't familiar with that one you should probably make yourself familiar with that one.
>Again, "average jackoffs" don't need to be part of any conspiracy, they just need to take orders and believe in the lie. There's nothing that's suggests that millions would have to "be in on it"
Yeah actually they would be. Snipers and artillery units need to calculate for the curvature of the earth in their shots. Engineers building radio towers need to account for line of sight. Pilots and ship captains need to use the round earth model for navigation, ect.
And then let's look at medicine. I used to work in pharmaceuticals specifically on antibodies. We had clean rooms and all kinds of tests for contaminates especially bacteria and virus because those could destroy the cell cultures. You're telling me all the people doing those tests were in on it? It wasn't as simple as "red means bad" they had to test for biochemical signatures of the contaminates so they contaminates could be contained. Those people who have to be in on it as would the people who designed the equipment to test for it and, the people who designed the facility the people prescribing the medication, ect
>>392761
Join him on the flat earth side ninjaz, you are already so close.
>>392760
>Sorry but a 3rd grader can do the math and figure out you can't bake 6 million cookies in 4 years. You need to do about 3000-4000 cookies per day which requires too many overns.
This assumes every body was burned and they didn't toss the kikes in mass graves.
>Sorry but a 3rd grader can do the math and figure out you can't bake 6 million cookies in 4 years. You need to do about 3000-4000 cookies per day which requires too many overns.
This assumes every body was burned and they didn't toss the kikes in mass graves.
>>392762
>antibiotics
Used primarily for infection
>Antiretrovirals
Don't have gay sex or multiple sex partners and you won't catch aids/HIV
>antibodies
Proteins used to stop infections
>lithium
Other forms of mood stabilizers exist, such as food
It's like you didn't read what I typed out. *other than treating infections*. They aren't going after Germs and viruses which can't even hurt a fly
>antibiotics
Used primarily for infection
>Antiretrovirals
Don't have gay sex or multiple sex partners and you won't catch aids/HIV
>antibodies
Proteins used to stop infections
>lithium
Other forms of mood stabilizers exist, such as food
It's like you didn't read what I typed out. *other than treating infections*. They aren't going after Germs and viruses which can't even hurt a fly
>>392765
The infections are caused by germs that is why they use antibiotics and antiretrovirals. You can use antiretrovirals for viruses other than AIDS. Also monoclonal antibodies are used for a lot more than infections. Cancer for example. And gene therapy can permanently cure sickle cell and other conditions. I have a feeling you aren't a fan of that though.
The infections are caused by germs that is why they use antibiotics and antiretrovirals. You can use antiretrovirals for viruses other than AIDS. Also monoclonal antibodies are used for a lot more than infections. Cancer for example. And gene therapy can permanently cure sickle cell and other conditions. I have a feeling you aren't a fan of that though.
>>392762
I suppose I should respond to the rest of your post
You can find interviews of the top kill count snipers in America. They give details on how windspeed and air conditions affects the bullet, they never bring up bullshit about coriolis or curve of the earth. The though never even crosses their mind when their finger is on the trigger
What about line of sight for construction of radio towers shows earth curve? Lines of sight are straight and flat. They build towers just fine so long as the signals can reach far enough. Never has earth curve been a problem for this
Pilots use what is called a azimuthal equidistant projection on a radar. That's a flat earth map. Not that I claim that map, because there are problems with it. Many flat earthers also dont claim that map. Regardless of the problems pilots use it just fine.
Everyone uses flat maps for navigation, without exception. Before electronic technology became advanced, celestial navigation was used. It uses a flat earth.
To respond to your first point, who is exactly "all the people" and how do you know they all said they saw planes? You interviewed every single person in New York that was there that day? No you didnt
[Read more] I suppose I should respond to the rest of your post
You can find interviews of the top kill count snipers in America. They give details on how windspeed and air conditions affects the bullet, they never bring up bullshit about coriolis or curve of the earth. The though never even crosses their mind when their finger is on the trigger
What about line of sight for construction of radio towers shows earth curve? Lines of sight are straight and flat. They build towers just fine so long as the signals can reach far enough. Never has earth curve been a problem for this
Pilots use what is called a azimuthal equidistant projection on a radar. That's a flat earth map. Not that I claim that map, because there are problems with it. Many flat earthers also dont claim that map. Regardless of the problems pilots use it just fine.
Everyone uses flat maps for navigation, without exception. Before electronic technology became advanced, celestial navigation was used. It uses a flat earth.
To respond to your first point, who is exactly "all the people" and how do you know they all said they saw planes? You interviewed every single person in New York that was there that day? No you didnt
>>392766
Infections are caused by pathogens or toxins. You can't produce a sneeze or cough that's powerful enough to make someone sick.
Infections are caused by pathogens or toxins. You can't produce a sneeze or cough that's powerful enough to make someone sick.
I should also note that all literature that's along the lines of "Pilots guide to the globe earth" are all simulations, not the actual radar that pilots are using. Anyway this should be taken to the flat earth thread on /vx/ because it's getting a little too much for this thread
>>392768
Nigger I met some dude who was in school at the time. Pretty sure he didn't have a reason to lie. Go talk to someone who was in view of the towers in 2001. There are many of them.
The Coriolis effect and Eötvös effect are just lies they teach new snipers to make them less effective in combat then all in effort to keep the round earth scam going?
>>392769
Tuberculosis would like a word.
Nigger I met some dude who was in school at the time. Pretty sure he didn't have a reason to lie. Go talk to someone who was in view of the towers in 2001. There are many of them.
The Coriolis effect and Eötvös effect are just lies they teach new snipers to make them less effective in combat then all in effort to keep the round earth scam going?
>>392769
Tuberculosis would like a word.
>>392772
You cannot be inside a school and simotaneously see planes hit the towers. What a bullshit story from him. What, he looked out the window at just the right time? And that window was facing the tower too? Sounds like too much detail for it to be true, due to occams razor it's bullshit
You cannot be inside a school and simotaneously see planes hit the towers. What a bullshit story from him. What, he looked out the window at just the right time? And that window was facing the tower too? Sounds like too much detail for it to be true, due to occams razor it's bullshit
>>392762
>embrace flat-earth
I almost want to, in the same sense that "Starlight Glimmer is best pone" is delightfully sacregligious, but in spite of the lulz I can't honestly pretend that there's evidence the earth is flat. I have attempted to suggest that the earth is MAYBE less round than one might think?, but that's silly, because only the idea that the earth is flat (with whatever geological layering, which no - don't ask - doesn't matter.
>embrace flat-earth
I almost want to, in the same sense that "Starlight Glimmer is best pone" is delightfully sacregligious, but in spite of the lulz I can't honestly pretend that there's evidence the earth is flat. I have attempted to suggest that the earth is MAYBE less round than one might think?, but that's silly, because only the idea that the earth is flat (with whatever geological layering, which no - don't ask - doesn't matter.
>>392776
You mean try applying it to muslim extremists who hijacked a plane and their passport survived in the flames?
I'm going with CGI, it's a less detailed and more logical explanation
Bacteria can be found everywhere on earth. Lots can be done to prevent build up of bad bacteria in the body. No evidence to suggest that it's contagious and spreads from person to person. Someone else's immunity response isn't going to affect you in any way, they can't transmit it
You mean try applying it to muslim extremists who hijacked a plane and their passport survived in the flames?
I'm going with CGI, it's a less detailed and more logical explanation
Bacteria can be found everywhere on earth. Lots can be done to prevent build up of bad bacteria in the body. No evidence to suggest that it's contagious and spreads from person to person. Someone else's immunity response isn't going to affect you in any way, they can't transmit it
>>392777
You are already at the dinosaurs and men lived side by side level and are flirting with germ theory denial. Evidence stopped mastering to you a long time ago. Embrace flat earth and become the most specialist of Boyz.
>>392779
>You mean try applying it to muslim extremists who hijacked a plane and their passport survived in the flames?
Or the planes were real and the passports were not...
>No evidence to suggest that it's contagious and spreads from person to person. Someone else's immunity response isn't going to affect you in any way, they can't transmit it
So hospitals just quarantine TB patients for the lulz then?
You are already at the dinosaurs and men lived side by side level and are flirting with germ theory denial. Evidence stopped mastering to you a long time ago. Embrace flat earth and become the most specialist of Boyz.
>>392779
>You mean try applying it to muslim extremists who hijacked a plane and their passport survived in the flames?
Or the planes were real and the passports were not...
>No evidence to suggest that it's contagious and spreads from person to person. Someone else's immunity response isn't going to affect you in any way, they can't transmit it
So hospitals just quarantine TB patients for the lulz then?
>>392780
The planes being real still suggest there were expert Muslim pilots who hijacked a plane and suicided in the name of their religion. It's a retarded story even when you rule out the passport
TB is an infection, thanks for pointing that out again
The planes being real still suggest there were expert Muslim pilots who hijacked a plane and suicided in the name of their religion. It's a retarded story even when you rule out the passport
TB is an infection, thanks for pointing that out again
[Reply] [Last 50 Posts] [Last 100 Posts] [Last 200 Posts]
You are viewing older replies. Click [View All] or [Last n Posts] to vew latest posts.
Clicking update will load all posts posted after last post on this page.
Post pagination: [Prev] [1-200] [201-400] [401-600] [601-800] [801-836] [Next] [Live (last 200 replies)]
836 replies | 179 files | 130 UUIDs | Page 5
[Add to Thread Watcher]