https://news.sky.com/story/pakistan-warns-kashmir-row-could-lead-to-all-out-war-with-india-13355033Following a mass shooting in Kashmir that left 26 tourists dead that India have blamed on Pakistan, relations between the two countries have broken down.
Indian Prime Minister Modi has vowed to purse those responsible to the ends of the Earth while Pakistan's defence minister warns the row could result in all out war between the two countries.
Both countries have nuclear weapons.
213 replies and 53 files omitted.
I don't think we're lucky enough to get a war between India and Pakistan. Isn't the Pakistani government completely broke and non-functional, and basically on the verge of collapse? I can't imagine Pakistan successfully waging a war against India.
>>387926Pakistan's gov is backed by China and America.
>>387921In all my arguing with the boomer for the past four years, he has never, ever even once changed his opinion or acknowledged a fact that contradicted his worldview. You may as well be arguing with a brick wall.
>>387924>That's is what the American government taught the America peopleNo. That is not what the government said. Hiroshima was already rebuilt by then. Point to an official government statement that says that.
It's only Hollywood that says that crap, because they don't actually know how it works.
>>387925Also this.
The government didn't even know how radiation affected people in the 60s, which is why glowniggers kept dosing Americans with acute doses of it to see what it would do to people.
>>387927America is more likely to side with India than Pakistan. We only pay the Pakis to keep them from blowing things up.
[Read more] >>387918>bait meit is not bait anon, it is science.
Sorry you've got frustrated.
>>387930Give me an example of an officially published piece of "science" that echoes your claim that an atom bomb would irradiate an area for thousands of years.
Just one citation. Any example.
>>387931>an atom bomb would irradiate an area for thousands of years.>Just one citation. Any example.I accept the challenge and in case the failure I'll take the L
Give me time.
>>387926>Isn't the Pakistani government completely broke and non-functional, and basically on the verge of collapse?That just means they have less to lose.
>I can't imagine Pakistan successfully waging a war against India.Pakistan would probably lose, but that might not stop them from trying to cause as much destruction as possible.
>>387934That means they literally can't afford the war and won't be able to prosecute it though. They already have a vastly smaller population and economy.
>>387935>That means they literally can't afford the war and won't be able to prosecute it thoughThey can still launch missiles. They are doing it as we speak.
>They already have a vastly smaller population and economy.This is correct. They would likely lose to India.
But Muslims aren't known for self-preservation or rational risk assessment.
>>387423Fighting heats up along the Line of Contact in the Leepa Valley in Kashmir.
https://[replace me with telegram]/Middle_East_Spectator/17654
>>388120https://x.com/visegrad24/status/1916101372941828259 [Embed]India release water into the river without notification causing flooding downstream in Pakistan.
Well, shit. It looks like things are heating up.
If this was going to remain a purely local event, that would be one thing, but there are going to be some sort of knock-on effects worldwide, including in the West. Frankly, I think we've got enough problems to deal with here.
They'll probably bring their foreign conflicts into the borders of our countries, too.
lol, feeling thirsty yet pakitrannies
lmao even
>>387423Bring on the nukes! (There won't be any)
>>388141I bet you India got the locals near the dam to shit in the water before releasing it.
>>387600How did this retardation derail the thread?
>>388383>refugeesThe closest destination is Afghanistan, China, Bangladesh. There is no reason for shitskins to end up in White Lands. I bet those neighbor countries won't let them in under any circumstance.
>>388385>The closest destinationWe both know that shitskins don't end up in "the closest destination".
>There is no reason for shitskins to end up in White Lands.They will go to Europe for gibs.
>I bet those neighbor countries won't let them in under any circumstance.Exactly. Neighboring countries will send them on their way to Europe.
>>388387>Exactly. Neighboring countries will send them on their way to Europe.that might have worked for 30 millionish "syrian" "refugees" who pretty much had a straight shot at Europe(and a bunch still wound up in Turkey), but an order of magnitude more will definitely crush even the passthrough countries.
>>388387>They will go to Europe for gibs.>>388390>but an order of magnitude moreThen make room for the pajeet race. Think about it, White countries don't exist any longer because the frog in the pan was cooked slowly, may be, just may be, by suddenly increasing the heat the frog will jump and fight back. Otherwise extinction is the well deserved fate of a comfy and coward White race.
>>388391>They will go to Europe for gibs.Will they be magically teleporting? hundreds of millions of people are going to have to trundle over thousands of miles to get from India to Europe.
>Then make room for the pajeet race.read the post again, the Chinese, Arabs, et al will NOT be making room for the pajeet race, even assuming that Europe is totally cool with being destroyed.
>>388402>hundreds of millions of people are going to have to trundle over thousands of miles to get from India to Europe.USAID and Christian and jew charities teleported tens of millions of non-Whites from around the world into the States before. So, they have experience how to do it.
>read the post againCorrect, read it again. I was referring to US (we) should make room as an accelerationist measure.
>>388403>USAID and Christian and jew charities teleported tens of millions of non-Whites from around the world into the States before. So, they have experience how to do it.Tens of millions over decades is not hundreds of millions immediately. They emphatically have no way to move that many people.
>Correct, read it again.Your point is rendered irrelevant by the above.
>>388411>They emphatically have no way to move that many peopleThe purpose of bringing non-Whites is to replace Whites while bankrolling their reproduction, giving them full political rights, and introducing them into the labor market as soon as possible, all which is tied together to dispossess Whites. Even not fetching any more foreigners, and taking into account the fertility rates, Whites already lost their land. There is no way to deny that.
>>388416From the kike's mouth. Jump to timestamp 1:00:
"The task is to bring these minorities together in such a way, that it makes it impossible for the legacy of whiteness to reproduce itself"
>>388416Ok, if you want to start another thread about doomerisms and how nukes are fake go do that, but we are talking about India/Pakistan here, and its likely outcomes.
>>388419Do you suppose they've hypnotized themselves into actually believing the nonsense?
That the one and only race that has done the most for humanity, that has ended slavery within it's own borders and worked to end slavery in a more general sense, is really the only group who can be tarred with the brush of slavery?
This is probably best discussed in a Jewish Nonsense specific thread. It bugs me that they seem to live with passion in a kind of anti-truth bubble of insanity. Words being used to obtain power rather than more perfectly describe truth is disgusting to me on a bone-deep level.
>>388477>>388474The FBI director's opinion isn't really relevant to U.S. foreign policy.
>>388518>The FBI directorA racial alien nevertheless.
>>388526Yeah, sure, but what does that have to do with what I said?
The pajeet's opinion is irrelevant. He has no authority to dictate USA policy towards this war.
I support this eventuality
>>388529That alien creature has been placed on a position of power over White America. It is the symbolism and another attempt to normalize non-Whites on the land.
>>388531Mass repatriation of the foreigners first. I don't want the overflow from this conflict to negatively affect the West.
>>388534>Mass repatriation of the foreigners first.And denaturalization second together with their children.
>>388532It's still not really relevant to the news.
>>388578This source does not say that Hiroshima should be uninhabitable for "thousands of years".
This source is talking about concentrated nuclear waste disposal, not nuclear weapons. It's apples to oranges.
Make a different thread to talk about nukes, to not derail this one.
>>388581>This source does not say that Hiroshima should be uninhabitable for "thousands of years".Any nuke contains as main ingredient plutonium which has a half-life of thousands of years.
>>387526That's an amazing fucking gif. Saved
>>387526>I do wonder what the future of culture war stuff will be likeAccording to Patrick Buchanan, the future is Race War.
>inbred for WAR
>Die defending literal SHIT
They give war such a bad name.