/mlpol/ - My Little Politics


If you want to see the latest posts from all boards in a convenient way please check out /overboard/
For Pony, Pony, Pony and Pony check out >>>/poner also Mares

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
6000
Select File / Oekaki
File(s)
No files selected
Password (For file and/or post deletion.)

India vs Pakistan.jpg
Possible war between India and Pakistan
Anonymous
21c2ecd
?
No.387423
387424 387442 387447 387476 387505 387563 387564 388135 388157
https://news.sky.com/story/pakistan-warns-kashmir-row-could-lead-to-all-out-war-with-india-13355033

Following a mass shooting in Kashmir that left 26 tourists dead that India have blamed on Pakistan, relations between the two countries have broken down.

Indian Prime Minister Modi has vowed to purse those responsible to the ends of the Earth while Pakistan's defence minister warns the row could result in all out war between the two countries.

Both countries have nuclear weapons.
213 replies and 61 files omitted.
Anonymous
ec615b3
?
No.387771
387774
>>387769
So they both get nuked, and fuck up the entire hemisphere with their poocular winter while they're at it.
Anonymous
21c2ecd
?
No.387774
>>387771
Certainly moots the water issue when it's suddenly all radioactive.
Anonymous
9578a1b
?
No.387777
387798 387815 387840
GpVimwSW4AArkiK.png

Anonymous
966c2d4
?
No.387796
387821
>>387718
>Nagasaki
Exactly, and Hiroshima too. There was not and there is not any radioactive measurements. Those are clean modern Japanese cities and according to the establishment lies, radiation would make them unsuitable for life for thousands of years.
Anonymous
966c2d4
?
No.387798
59cf4fdc.png
>>387777
>quads
This.
Anonymous
7544781
?
No.387815
check.png
>>387777
Check
Anonymous
9578a1b
?
No.387821
387855
>>387796
Try visiting there. I'm sure they would love to hear your insights.
>Those are clean modern Japanese cities and according to the establishment lies, radiation would make them unsuitable for life for thousands of years.
That is not how nuclear weapons work.
Anonymous
60d78a7
?
No.387840
checked.gif
>>387777
Anonymous
f2ace84
?
No.387855
387857 387863
>>387821
>That is not how nuclear weapons work.
Ahem. So you are saying a nuclear "detonation" will not leave any radioactive residue?
Anonymous
21c2ecd
?
No.387857
387860
>>387855
What is its half life?
Anonymous
f2ace84
?
No.387860
387861 387863
>>387857
>What is its half life?
Ah, you mean isotope decay. Well, according to "science" the decay might last tens of thousands of years. You see, the decay will end when isotopes turn into inert lead.
Anonymous
21c2ecd
?
No.387861
387867
>>387860
Wrong. Nuclear fallout has a half life of about 30 years. The bomb was dropped about 80 years ago.
Anonymous
9578a1b
?
No.387863
387864
>>387855
The radiation decayed over the past 80 years. It was almost entirely gone in the late 50's.
>>387860
>Well, according to "science" the decay might last tens of thousands of years.
No it fucking doesn't, you delusional midwit. You are making shit up based on nonsense you absorbed third hand through memes. Nuclear fallout from an atom bomb decays over the course of a couple decades.
Anonymous
21c2ecd
?
No.387864
>>387863
It is *now*. Less so in the 50s.
Anonymous
f2ace84
?
No.387867
387869 387870 387875 387911
>>387861
>Wrong.
Seriously?
Let us see, if my instrument measured 1 rad on 1945, then, and according to you, in 1975 the reading would be 0.5 rad and in 2005, 0.25 rad.
Anonymous
9578a1b
?
No.387869
387872
>>387867
What are you asserting? No scientists say that atom bombs irradiate an area "for thousands of years". Nobody has ever claimed that Hiroshima and Nagasaki should still be irradiated.
Anonymous
21c2ecd
?
No.387870
387875
>>387867
After 30 years half of the radioactive material has decayed, again halving every 30 years. That is what half life means. Taking 90 years for ease of calculation it has halved, then halved then halved again so is now at 1/8th of what it was originally.
Anonymous
f2ace84
?
No.387872
387878
>>387869
>Nobody has ever claimed that Hiroshima and Nagasaki should still be irradiated.
Exactly, and that contradicts science. Therefore those cities were never nuked.
Just undeniable facts.
Anonymous
f2ace84
?
No.387875
387877
>>387870
Exactly what I said on >>387867
Anonymous
21c2ecd
?
No.387877
387885
>>387875
You were talking about it lasting thousands of years. Things with a half life of thousands of years are barely radioactive at all. Dangerously radioactive things have a half life in days or hours.
Anonymous
9578a1b
?
No.387878
387880 389280
>>387872
>Exactly, and that contradicts science.
What science are you referencing? We both just demonstrated to you how the radiation from the bomb would decay to irrelevant levels over the course of a few decades.
Anonymous
f2ace84
?
No.387880
387887
>>387878
>What science are you referencing?
Physics 101, the isotope chapter.
Anonymous
f2ace84
?
No.387885
387886
>>387877
>You were talking about it lasting thousands of years.
Correct, that is why Carbon 14 is a test, a very unreliable test by the way, but it works because isotope decay last millions of years.
Anonymous
21c2ecd
?
No.387886
387889
>>387885
That one does. Not all radioactive materials are the same.
Anonymous
9578a1b
?
No.387887
387894 387895
half-life-formula.png
>>387880
Nigger, you should be able to do this math with a highschool level education.
Since you are so smart, write it out and tell me what number you get for the amount of time for nuclear fallout to decay to irrelevant levels.

(Spoiler alert: it's not thousands of years)
Anonymous
f2ace84
?
No.387889
387890 387893
>>387886
>Not all radioactive materials are the same.
Sure, but in the case of Carbon 14, the test is based in a comparison between C14 and highly radioactive material.
Anonymous
9578a1b
?
No.387890
387891
>>387889
That's hardly relevant to the atom bombs dropped on Japan.
Anonymous
f2ace84
?
No.387891
387894
>>387890
Sure, but because you look like can't grasp the concept of isotope decay, kindergarten level I should apply.
Anonymous
21c2ecd
?
No.387893
387896
>>387889
Carbon dating works by measuring the ratio of carbon 14 to carbon 12 in the sample.
Anonymous
9578a1b
?
No.387894
>>387891
Answer this >>387887 , to prove that you can actually grasp it.
Anonymous
f2ace84
?
No.387895
387903
>>387887
>Calculus
Sorry, it was so many years ago.
Anonymous
f2ace84
?
No.387896
387898
>>387893
>carbon 14 to carbon 12 in the sample.
Not in every lab.
Anonymous
21c2ecd
?
No.387898
387900
>>387896
That is how it works. You absorb carbon 14 from food meaning you right now have a certain ratio of carbon 14 to carbon 12 in your body. Then you die and stop taking in carbon 14, which then slowly decays over time.
Anonymous
f2ace84
?
No.387900
387902 387903
>>387898
What about the range of uranides salts? That's way more emissions than carbon.
Anonymous
21c2ecd
?
No.387902
387907
>>387900
Not sure what you mean by that. Try to say it clearer.
Anonymous
9578a1b
?
No.387903
387908 387914
>>387895
>Sorry, it was so many years ago.
So you're saying you don't actually know then?
I do. The answer is a bit over one year, with almost all of it being gone in first couple days.
>>387900
That's still not relevant to the atom bomb's fallout.
Anonymous
f2ace84
?
No.387907
>>387902
Sorry, U235 when turning into isotopes gives way to a whole range of highly radioactive elements. And if remember well, when diluted in acids are called salts.
Anonymous
21c2ecd
?
No.387908
387911
>>387903

Cesium-137 half life ~30 years

Strontium-90 half life ~28 years.

Iodine-131 half life 8 days.

That's nuclear fallout.
Anonymous
f2ace84
?
No.387911
387912
>>387908
>half life
Okay, here is where you have the misunderstanding, that term "half life" is self explanatory. See >>387867 for a practical tutorial.
Anonymous
21c2ecd
?
No.387912
387916 387918
>>387911
You said it was almost all gone in a couple of days. The shortest half life on that list is 8 days.
Anonymous
b8c6071
?
No.387913
Radiation is directly related to the half life though. Radiation comes from the decay of the atoms, meaning that the higher the half-life of the element, the less dangerous it is. So elements with very, very long half lifes are not actually very dangerous, at least relative to those with very short half lifes.

Sure, there are elements out there with half life's in the millions, billions, or even trillions of years, but they are barely radioactive at all.
Anonymous
f2ace84
?
No.387914
>>387903
>That's still not relevant to the atom bomb's fallout.
Of course not, but I trying to explain the periodic table to you.
Anonymous
f2ace84
?
No.387916
387917
>>387912
>You said it was almost all gone in a couple of days.
Nope, I said that never were any atomic explosion and it is actually a hoax.
Anonymous
21c2ecd
?
No.387917
387918 387919
>>387916
Then you're a muppet.
Anonymous
9578a1b
?
No.387918
387923 387930
I'm tired of arguing with this boomer. He's been shitting up this board for four years now with his retardation, and I feel guilty for letting him once again bait me into derailing another good thread.
It's midnight. Hopefully the jeets nuke eachother to deatb, so we can demonstrate to the village idiot how nukes work in real time.
>>387912
You are correct. I was thinking of the dangers of acute exposure. I stand corrected.
>387914
>>>/cyb/
>>387917
Just give up. There's no reasoning with this asshole. Just look at how he behaved in the flat earth thread.
Anonymous
f2ace84
?
No.387919
387921
>>387917
Whatever, but according to "science", the facts don't add up with the "official story".
Anonymous
21c2ecd
?
No.387921
387924 387929
>>387919
You don't know the science though. You think that a nuke makes a place into some instant death field that nobody can enter for millennia.
Anonymous
f2ace84
?
No.387923
>>387918
>Hopefully the jeets nuke eachother to deatb
I hope that too, sadly it won't happen.
Anonymous
f2ace84
?
No.387924
387925 387929
>>387921
>You think that a nuke makes a place into some instant death field that nobody can enter for millennia.
That's is what the American government taught the America people in the 50s, 60s, and 70s in bibliographies and news and movies.
Anonymous
21c2ecd
?
No.387925
387929
>>387924
More like the US government was doing radiation experiments on you and told you it was only a little bit of radiation but was in fact a lot of radiation. People got sick and ever since have believe that even a little radiation is deadly.

Thread Watcher
TW