/mlpol/ - My Little Politics

>Tucker: U.S. Becoming a 'One Party State' And Debates On 'Demographic Change' Are Being Suppressed
https://www.informationliberation.com/?id=63731
https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1651376097349578753
Tucker's first commentary after being kicked out.

Now the counter-balance.

Related. The (((alt-media))) is taking positions to replace MSM.

>Amazing Polly
>Meet the So-Called Independent Alternative Media - Dig into RUMBLE
>You think there are all these individual freedom fighters making video content on 'alternative media'? A lot of these people are under contract - but who pulls the strings?
https://www.bitchute.com/video/OXeJX8FaAiYf/

>>361999
>Why if he was working for the CIA, and he had the highest-rated cable TV show for three years running, and he was doing his job as “controlled opposition” was his ousting just orchestrated by the…CIA, their election machine front company, and their Mockingbird media allies?
Perhaps for the same reasons Trump was deposed while playing the victim and fool card. I think gatekeeping is the right word and Fuentes has a huge point making his argument on Tucker. >>361973 →

>>The Tuck Gets Cucked - Tucker Carlson revealed as a fed - Nick Fuentes
https://www.bitchute.com/video/mef5eYnD5vvp/

I'm just going to leave this here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razor

Tucker is kind of a mixed bag. He serves as a pressure valve to keep a large portion of right-leaning people participating in the (((system))), but also occasionally gives normalfags information which pushes them in the right direction. I wonder if this development means the elites have decided his burden to the system due to the latter has become larger than his use to the system due to the former.

>>362002
>This philosophical razor advocates that when presented with competing hypotheses about the same prediction, one should prefer the one that requires fewest assumptions
Interesting.
I will keep ALL assumptions as valid, just in case.

>>362004
>I wonder if this development means the elites have decided his burden to the system due to the latter has become larger than his use to the system due to the former.
Knowing that in politics absolutely nothing is random, I'll stick with the >>361745 → claim, which for my understanding makes perfect sense:

<The deep state is moving its puppets in place to make the pendulum swing to the far right. It's not organic, it's a show and all pre-planned.

>>362005
<I will keep ALL hypotheses as valid, just in case.
If only nu-polacks were to do that, instead of just shilling the most convoluted theory imaginable like it was gospel.

>>362009
>instead of just shilling the most convoluted theory imaginable like it was gospel.
After aaaaaaaaall these years, can you blame them?
And just for the record, /pol/ was, is, and always will be right.

>>362004
>He serves as a pressure valve to keep a large portion of right-leaning people participating in the (((system)))
Is "pressure valve" even a thing? What would happen if all those normies didn't participate in the system (voting, having jobs, raising families, etc). Nothing is gained if they just sit around doing nothing.

>>362015
>Is "pressure valve" even a thing?
Totally. It is also known as Hopium and is the main ingredient in keeping the political charade going. The faster the normies are up to speed that the whole system is a illegitimate oligarchy and not a Republic, the better.

>>362016
>The faster the normies are up to speed that the whole system is a illegitimate oligarchy and not a Republic, the better.
They need to catch up with the fact that local oligarchs are subordinated to the international Synarchy, then puppet politicians pursue not the national interest but foreign ones.
It is called globalism, internationalism, cosmopolitalism, for a reason.

>>362015
Raising families isn't part of participating in the system. Strong families are a fundamental part of undermining it. That's why all it continually promotes policies which are antithetical to building them, such as social welfare, public education, inflation, and abortion.

>>362010
>And just for the record, /pol/ was, is, and always will be right.
And a National Socialist board.
/)

>>362020
Nu-polacks are lolbertarians post 2019.
>>362010
Yes, because they're all nu-polacks who don't even recognise 4 year old pastas.

>>362025
>Nu-polacks are lolbertarians post 2019.
Yes.

>>362025
>>362026
>Nu-polacks are lolbertarians post 2019.
You hate to see it

>>362010
>/pol/ is right again
How do they keep doing it?
Read a book to jumpstart the noticing.
The movers and shakers that pull and tug are Spiritual. The flesh is only flesh, spirit is spirit. The vectors they both combat on are numerous.
Carlson as a media man did what (((they))) needed.
Which Tucker Carlson was only of the media news not necessarily the Good News.
It's to their advantage to cut him off when they start the fast slide. The real reason is to pump more information out than the time allotment allowed. If you know you know. And if You know don't worry.

>>362029
>/pol/ is right again
>How do they keep doing it?
Meme magick.

Tucker Carlson opposes White Identity politics - (2023-04)

>TUCKER CARLSON EXPOSED (WAKE UP FOXTARDS)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/M1n3RJL5cRpp/
From 2021. This is a thorough biography on CIA Tucker. He and his family is so intertwined with the establishment and zog that they are indistinguishable.

>>362037
>>362038
I'm glad this subversive fag is gone.

>>362040
>gone
LOL no. I believe his firing is just a parody to relaunch The Tucker on steroids and lead the MAGA crowd.
I'm watching >>362038 right now and is mind blowing how The Tuck is related to zog.

>>362026
>>362028
Get along, we're all racist horsefuckers here.

>>362018
It depends on what you mean by "the system" then. I thought you meant the economy plus society as a whole. I would say that raising a family has been an integral part of participating in society for a long time, just not necessarily a negative one.

Okay, personal opinions on what we think about Tucker aside, what are the actual political implications of him being fired? He was the biggest personality in TV news, and demonstrably influenced the republican party and its constituency. What will things be like now that he's gone?

>>362041
>I believe his firing is just a parody to relaunch The Tucker on steroids and lead the MAGA crowd
What would it air on? He's probably not going back to cable news, and I don't think a streaming show would reach the same audience.

>>362038
While this is probably true, it's also worth noting that pretty much every journalist in American news is intertwined with the CIA in some way, so this isn't particularly exclusive to Tucker.

>>362016
>Hopium
I hear this term all the time, but I see little evidence of things being better in absence of it in many circumstances. People weren't forming RWDS before Tucker, and I doubt they will after he's fired.
>The faster the normies are up to speed that the whole system is a illegitimate oligarchy and not a Republic, the better.
From my experience, this is largely already a thing, but people don't do shit because they don't know what to do about it or how to stop it.

>>362046
>what are the actual political implications of him being fired?
The Same political implications that were there when we were all purged off of social media in 2017
>What will things be like now that he's gone?
Even worse

Fuentes comes in again.
>Cucker's career explained

>>362053
>when we were all purged off of social media in 2017
What are you referring to? I never used social media.

>>362054
Isnt fuentes a literal faggot?

>>362057
yes he is, he got exposed as a faggot who jerks off to trannies by Mister Redditor back when they had beef last year. Fuentes is also a Guntguarder.

>>362057
Totally. Nevertheless, he is speaking truth.

>What Really Happened
>We’re finally getting a fuller picture.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IdUlsLq0eGk
Tucker has not been fired and is still on Fox's payroll.

>>362057
>>362059
He is also a federal informant and a hypocrite. Needless to say, don't take him as a reliable source.
>>362072
Interesting. That makes a lot of sense. I wonder what this contract actually says. Obviously Tucker can't work for anyone else, but he was able to publish this >>361995 and so he can still do a lot with social media. Since he no longer has any show to lose, he can be even more upfront now.

>>362129
Fox was always apart of them

>>362150
For the MAGA normies now it is official. Fox joined the dark side.

>Wow, what a scandal
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhUxZgGdOyI
Fox is leaking video clips to commie media in an attempt to embarrass Tucker.

E. Michael Jones
>Tucker Carlson Fired - Now what?
>E. Michael Jones joins Aleš Ernecl to discuss Tucker Carlson and other recent news.
https://tv.gab.com/watch?v=64512ff313f67144753bb813
Mirrors:
https://odysee.com/@E.MichelJones:f/Tucker-Carlson-fired-Now-what:9
https://www.bitchute.com/video/TvDtpsUJp65p/

Just to remind everyone of what this thread is about.

WEF's Young Global Leader darling Tulsi Gabbard interviews CIA Tucker Carlson.

>>362265
>he thinks the CIA own everything
Thats a funny way to say jews buddy.

>>362411
>darling Tulsi Gabbard
They are all playing in the same team while pretending to be on the side of the American People.

>>362470
I don't get it, how can they fire him without releasing him from his contract?
Also, where does he intend to work next?

>>362471
That's the point, as long as Tucker is under Fox's contract, he cannot work anywhere else and therefore is gagged for the 2024 election.

>>362472
He could still do his monologues, but not for money.
That contract is bullshit though. Anti-competitive contracts are bullshit in all contexts.

>>362472
>>362473
Seems like the real test for the legitimacy of his convictions is whether or not he's willing to just say "fuck it" and do his show online somewhere free of charge. If I'm understanding it correctly they can't stop him from doing his show, they can just stop him from profiting. The guy has millions of dollars so it's not like he can't afford to go two years without pay, and as soon as the contract expires he can do anything he likes. There's nothing stopping him from just livestreaming his monologues unmonetized. Whether or not he's willing to if it comes to it will ultimately say a lot about where his heart really is.

>>362546
>Seems like the real test for the legitimacy of his convictions is whether or not he's willing to just say "fuck it" and do his show online somewhere free of charge.
>There's nothing stopping him from just livestreaming his monologues unmonetized.
I put all my chips on the idea that he is a CIA shill. And narrowing the globohomo actors' behavior on their common denominator, I believe he will do as the master mason says.

>NBC is triggered by Tucker news:
>"Will anybody be able to police what Carlson says or is this the point? It’s just a free for all?”
https://twitter.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1656136089202212865
Silly stuff.

>>362892
>He was going to go on the air and refute what that guy said on 60 Minutes.
I'm not buying it. If true he could go to Twitter, Gab, and even Rumble to spill the beams after his firing, but he didn't. Why it has to be only on Fox? Is it because of the money? I don't think so.

PAC Scam Alert.
The grifters are at it again.

>Republicans need a new leader that can stand up to Biden. It's time to draft Tucker Carlson
https://twitter.com/DrafttuckerPAC/status/1659353182106009603
>As Tucker’s attorney, I can unequivocally state that this PAC is unauthorized, that the people running it didn’t get his permission to use his name/likeness, and that it would be fruitless to contribute to such a PAC.
https://twitter.com/pnjaban/status/1660096010734141441

Tucker Carlson Releases Episode One of His ‘Tucker on Twitter’ Program – On the Explosion of the Kakhovka Dam in Ukraine that Was Blown Up Earlier Today
>Tucker on Twitter - Episode 1
>Tucker Carlson started his program:
>“This morning it looks like somebody blew up the Kakhovka Dam in southern Ukraine. The rushing wall of water wiped out entire villages, destroyed a critical hydropower plant, and as of tonight, puts the largest nuclear reactor in Europe in danger of melting down. So if this was intentional, it was not a military tactic. It was an act of terrorism. Them the question is, who did it? Well, let’s see. The Kokovka dam was effectively Russian. It was built by the Russian government. It currently sits in Russian controlled territory. The dam’s reservoir supplies water to Crimea, which has been, for the last 240 years, home of the Russian Black Sea fleet. Blowing up the dam may be bad for Ukraine, but it hurts Russia more. And for precisely that reason, the Ukrainian government has considered destroying it. In December, the Washington Post quoted a Ukrainian general saying his men had fired American made rockets at the dam’s floodgate as a test strike. So really, once the facts start coming in, it becomes much less of a mystery what might have happened to the dam. Any fair person would conclude that the Ukrainians probably blew it up, just as you would assume they blew up Nordstream, the Russian natural gas pipeline, last fall.”
https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1666203439146172419
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/qEyxvkkvI1g0/

>>363901
>muh extraterrestrials
He is suggesting aliens are real and ZOG is hiding it.

>>363932
Aliens aren’t real and Tucker is a CIA shill just like catboy fuentes said

>>364002
>Aliens aren’t real
How can you be sure?

>>364004
believe whatever you want to believe you fucking retarded ass boomer

>>364006
Wow, how insightful.

>>364008
i’m done having shitty arguments with retards and cia shills who just want to poison the well.

>>364010
What argument? I only asked you a question. You're the one who got all salty about it.
Anyway, I'm not saying aliens are real. I'm just saying we can't be sure. I'm sure there's plenty of secrets that the government keeps from us.

>>364011
kill yourself faggot; aliens aren’t real. While you’re at it why don’t you disprove the fact that you’re a jewish shill with my dick in ur mouth.

>>364012
>jewish shill
Funny buzzwords for a retard with no actual argument. Surely, me suggesting that extraordinary things could be plausible means I'm either a joke or working for kikes.
Besides, I didn't say they were real, I meant it's right to keep an open mind.

>>364013
kys kike, go back to cuckchan.

>>364006
>you fucking retarded ass boomer
KEK
It blows my mind this sudden boomerphobia,

>>364014
Nah, I've gotten used to this place over the past 6 years

>>364015
He's just throwing buzzwords. There are no actual boomers here.

>>364017
>He's just throwing buzzwords
It is suspicious. In the corona thread I just read a big rant against boom boom.
The hatred is real. KEK

>>364018
It looks more like an immitator to me. The other guy was much more coherent.

>>364019
>>364018
>>364017
>>364016
keep samefagging you baby boomer faggot. Imagine wasting your friday night on a cartoon horsefucking dead imageboard. No wonder your wife divorced you.

faggots like you are the reason why every political imageboard needs IDs:

Boomer anon is a serial unapologetic samefag who thinks he's doing everyone a favor, just cuz he uses the board as his personal facebook page.

--->Full threads for added context<---
>>>354588 → →
https://mlpol.net/mlpol/archive/357933#357958

>>364022
Is Boomer anon in the board with us now?

>>364022
I agree that threads are better off with IDs.

>>364024
you literally made 350 posts in the previous coronavirus thread which had about 700 posts. Imagine being that much of a fucking loser LMAO!!! People like you make me feel successful at life and that’s saying something.

>>364028
LOL
Imagine stalking boom boom and counting his posts.

>>364028
Boom Boom here. Chillax fren, everything is going to be alright.

>>364031
>>364032
you’re so fucking mad right now. Everyone can see through your newfaggotry and samefaggotry. Idk how in the fuck you found this website but I suggest you go back to facebook and fox news before I come over to your nursing home and smash your face in like your nigger caretaker does erryday.

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/fox-slaps-tucker-carlson-cease-desist-notice-over-twitter-show
>Fox News has sent a "case and desist" letter to Tucker Carlson, after the former Fox host racked up a combined 169 million combined views in his first two episodes of his show on Twitter
>Since Carlson's ouster in April following Fox News' $787 million defamation settlement with Dominion Voting Systems (which Carlson says a board member told him was part of the settlement)...
>"Doubling down on the most catastrophic programming decision in the history of the cable news industry, Fox is now demanding that Tucker Carlson be silent until after the 2024 election," reads the statement from Dhillon.
Couple interesting things here that jump out at me right away.
If I recall correctly there was a recent lawsuit against twitter and the google search engine and facebook if they are a media platform (like CNN, etc.) or if they are just publishing 3rd party content.
Section 230 immunity as publishers of third party content. (https://imprimis.hillsdale.edu/control-need-rein-big-tech/)
It appears Fox is implying that twitter is not under section 230 because then Tucker (and whoever else) can't claim first amendment freedom of speech on that platform.
The other thing that jumps out at me from this article is >Carlson says a board member told him was part of the settlement
Basically that Fox got rid of Tucker because Dominion required it as part of the cash settlement Fox agreed to.

>>364228
They won't even let him do free segments on Twitter? Holy shit.

Tucker Episode 3 just came out:

>Ep. 3 America's principles are at stake
https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1668747661028081664?cxt=HHwWgIC-tYDKyqguAAAA
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/HC6EhNOo9cmZ/

>>364275
Fuentes' follow up:

>Tuckers Show on Twitter - Its TRASH
https://www.bitchute.com/video/1eGVrWPVtDp5/

>>364301
I thought it was settled more than a year ago that Nick "Dating women is gay" Fuentes was a walking contradiction that should only be posted as a meme.

>>364228
Section 230 is literally a selective law that applies whenever convenient for the ones in power. If niggers are gonna abuse laws and rights like this, no wonder retarded normals beg to have freedom taken away.

>>364304
That's most laws honestly. Laws are only as good as they can be enforced, which is really nice when they get to pick which ones and when.
Its just interesting that fox seems to be implying that twitter isn't under section 230 anymore when the fuss about it was quite thoroughly discussed, what, a few months before Elon Musk bought it? Not sure how Fox will have a leg to stand on in this case. Maybe it does not matter for them though because Dominion probably asked for Tucker to be shut up, but he still isn't

>Tucker Carlson
>Ep. 4 Wannabe Dictator
https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1669472439472988161
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/eZLPjX1XEAfb/
Sarcasm +++
A blitzing critique of the "Wannabe Dictator" Biden.

>>364322
Holy shit, the parallels he draws to dictators. He's spitting pure fire since being kicked off Fox. How long till he actually becomes antisemitic and racially focused? I like this timeline, haha~

>>364323
>How long till he actually becomes antisemitic and racially focused?
Unlikely, he is a gatekeeper and the faggots pulling his strings want to stir shit.

>>364324
Maybe it's Tucker's charisma and I'm falling for it, but I certainly can sympathize with the things he talks about, even when I disagree on race or the JQ. It seems he really just wants to focus on the stuff that directly hurts law-abiding citizens like higher taxes, homelessness, and the criminal justice system. Perhaps the race issue has primarily evaded him because of an ingrained sense of egalitarianism that he can't personally shake, and not because he's a gatekeeper. I know I fell into that camp for a long time.

>>364325
>Perhaps the race issue has primarily evaded him because of an ingrained sense of egalitarianism that he can't personally shake, and not because he's a gatekeeper.
Nope. He is an actual kabbalist, then sorcery is his craft. No one in MSM can climb the ladder without to join the freemasons, then anti-White liberalism is his flavor and judaism is his inspiration.

>>364327
I'm sorry, I didn't realize I was on /vx/.

>>364328
See >>361968 →
By the way, Putin also wears one.

>>364330
Okay, I stand corrected. Damn.

>>364330
>blurry screencap of an unidentified red bracelet juxtaposed against a much more detailed image of some kind of jew bracelet that may or may not be the same kind of bracelet Tucker is wearing
Well, I sure don't need any more proof than that.

>>364335
I mean I don't know of all too many traditions that involve red clothing of any kind, much less a red bracelet made of a cloth material thin enough to look like string at a distance. Certainly doesn't look like any of those cheesy rubber bracelets you wear to show you support St. Jude. And I don't know a whole lot about kabbala either.

>>364337
I wasn't being sarcastic, I genuinely think this is 100% irrefutable proof of Goldstein status. wtf, I hate Tucker now. Incidentally, did you know that the Loch Ness monster is also a kike?

Unidentified flying object? More like Unidentified Flying Kosher Deli!

NOOO BIGFOOT NOT YOU TOO

>>364335
>>364338
>>364339
>>364340
Better debunk the red string nigger.

>>364338
>>364339
>>364340
In your images there is immense blur to the point that the thing in question may not even be what it's purported to be, i.e. the UFO can't even be proven to exist in the second image at all. Secondly, the parts you're highlighting are the same color and one or two pixels from the object itself. The bracelet is definitely there, and the blur is mild, evidently due to arm motion which exposed it in the first place.

You can be a nigger about it or you can tell me of a holiday or party that bracelet is supposed to represent.

I miss you silly niggers. It's been ages since I've last been here.

>>364338
That isn't the only time he wore it: https://invidious.lunar.icu/watch?v=mMmt7apcnTw

Here Putin also showing his alliance to the cult.

>>364345
Here's the video.

That still does not change that most of the things he says is true.
As I recall, one of the reasons he was "fired" was because of a private (cellphone) message to his director on fox about how white people were getting stomped on. Probably couldn't actually say that because fox is kikery

>>364344
then don't be a niggerfaggot and visit more often.

>>364350
I'll keep Tucker at arm's length just in case, as I do with any political figure nowadays...

>>364350
For the reason alone that he worked at Fox I wouldn't trust him, Whatever right thing hes said, Ill keep suspecting him for being controlled-opposition and you should do so too anon.

>>364352
You don't have to trust someone to watch a show.

>>364353
>You don't have to trust someone to watch a show.
Yes. But as all gatekeepers, they tell 90% truth mixed with 10% lies and shilling, he cannot be trusted.