>Tucker: U.S. Becoming a 'One Party State' And Debates On 'Demographic Change' Are Being Suppressedhttps://www.informationliberation.com/?id=63731https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1651376097349578753
Tucker's first commentary after being kicked out.
Related. The (((alt-media))) is taking positions to replace MSM.>Amazing Polly>Meet the So-Called Independent Alternative Media - Dig into RUMBLE>You think there are all these individual freedom fighters making video content on 'alternative media'? A lot of these people are under contract - but who pulls the strings?https://www.bitchute.com/video/OXeJX8FaAiYf/
>>361999>Why if he was working for the CIA, and he had the highest-rated cable TV show for three years running, and he was doing his job as “controlled opposition” was his ousting just orchestrated by the…CIA, their election machine front company, and their Mockingbird media allies?
Perhaps for the same reasons Trump was deposed while playing the victim and fool card. I think gatekeeping is the right word and Fuentes has a huge point making his argument on Tucker. >>361973 →>>The Tuck Gets Cucked - Tucker Carlson revealed as a fed - Nick Fuenteshttps://www.bitchute.com/video/mef5eYnD5vvp/
Tucker is kind of a mixed bag. He serves as a pressure valve to keep a large portion of right-leaning people participating in the (((system))), but also occasionally gives normalfags information which pushes them in the right direction. I wonder if this development means the elites have decided his burden to the system due to the latter has become larger than his use to the system due to the former.
>>362002>This philosophical razor advocates that when presented with competing hypotheses about the same prediction, one should prefer the one that requires fewest assumptions
I will keep ALL assumptions as valid, just in case.
>>362004>I wonder if this development means the elites have decided his burden to the system due to the latter has become larger than his use to the system due to the former.
Knowing that in politics absolutely nothing is random, I'll stick with the >>361745 →
claim, which for my understanding makes perfect sense:<The deep state is moving its puppets in place to make the pendulum swing to the far right. It's not organic, it's a show and all pre-planned.
>>362005<I will keep ALL hypotheses as valid, just in case.
If only nu-polacks were to do that, instead of just shilling the most convoluted theory imaginable like it was gospel.
>>362009>instead of just shilling the most convoluted theory imaginable like it was gospel.
After aaaaaaaaall these years, can you blame them?
And just for the record, /pol/ was, is, and always will be right.
>>362004>He serves as a pressure valve to keep a large portion of right-leaning people participating in the (((system)))
Is "pressure valve" even a thing? What would happen if all those normies didn't participate in the system (voting, having jobs, raising families, etc). Nothing is gained if they just sit around doing nothing.
>>362015>Is "pressure valve" even a thing?
Totally. It is also known as Hopium and is the main ingredient in keeping the political charade going. The faster the normies are up to speed that the whole system is a illegitimate oligarchy and not a Republic, the better.
>>362016>The faster the normies are up to speed that the whole system is a illegitimate oligarchy and not a Republic, the better.
They need to catch up with the fact that local oligarchs are subordinated to the international Synarchy, then puppet politicians pursue not the national interest but foreign ones.
It is called globalism, internationalism, cosmopolitalism, for a reason.
Raising families isn't part of participating in the system. Strong families are a fundamental part of undermining it. That's why all it continually promotes policies which are antithetical to building them, such as social welfare, public education, inflation, and abortion.
>>362010>And just for the record, /pol/ was, is, and always will be right.
And a National Socialist board.
Nu-polacks are lolbertarians post 2019.>>362010
Yes, because they're all nu-polacks who don't even recognise 4 year old pastas.
>>362010>/pol/ is right again
How do they keep doing it?
Read a book to jumpstart the noticing.The movers and shakers that pull and tug are Spiritual. The flesh is only flesh, spirit is spirit. The vectors they both combat on are numerous.
Carlson as a media man did what (((they))) needed.
Which Tucker Carlson was only of the media news not necessarily the Good News.
It's to their advantage to cut him off when they start the fast slide. The real reason is to pump more information out than the time allotment allowed. If you know you know. And if You know don't worry.
Tucker Carlson opposes White Identity politics - (2023-04)
>TUCKER CARLSON EXPOSED (WAKE UP FOXTARDS)https://www.bitchute.com/video/M1n3RJL5cRpp/
From 2021. This is a thorough biography on CIA Tucker. He and his family is so intertwined with the establishment and zog that they are indistinguishable.
I'm glad this subversive fag is gone.
LOL no. I believe his firing is just a parody to relaunch The Tucker
on steroids and lead the MAGA crowd.
I'm watching >>362038
right now and is mind blowing how The Tuck
is related to zog.
Get along, we're all racist horsefuckers here.
It depends on what you mean by "the system" then. I thought you meant the economy plus society as a whole. I would say that raising a family has been an integral part of participating in society for a long time, just not necessarily a negative one.
Okay, personal opinions on what we think about Tucker aside, what are the actual political implications of him being fired? He was the biggest personality in TV news, and demonstrably influenced the republican party and its constituency. What will things be like now that he's gone?
>>362041>I believe his firing is just a parody to relaunch The Tucker on steroids and lead the MAGA crowd
What would it air on? He's probably not going back to cable news, and I don't think a streaming show would reach the same audience.
While this is probably true, it's also worth noting that pretty much every journalist in American news is intertwined with the CIA in some way, so this isn't particularly exclusive to Tucker.
I hear this term all the time, but I see little evidence of things being better in absence of it in many circumstances. People weren't forming RWDS before Tucker, and I doubt they will after he's fired.>The faster the normies are up to speed that the whole system is a illegitimate oligarchy and not a Republic, the better.
From my experience, this is largely already a thing, but people don't do shit because they don't know what to do about it or how to stop it.
>>362046>what are the actual political implications of him being fired?
The Same political implications that were there when we were all purged off of social media in 2017>What will things be like now that he's gone?
Fuentes comes in again.
>Cucker's career explained
>>362053>when we were all purged off of social media in 2017
What are you referring to? I never used social media.
Isnt fuentes a literal faggot?
yes he is, he got exposed as a faggot who jerks off to trannies by Mister Redditor back when they had beef last year. Fuentes is also a Guntguarder.
Totally. Nevertheless, he is speaking truth.
>What Really Happened>We’re finally getting a fuller picture.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IdUlsLq0eGk
Tucker has not been fired and is still on Fox's payroll.
He is also a federal informant and a hypocrite. Needless to say, don't take him as a reliable source.>>362072
Interesting. That makes a lot of sense. I wonder what this contract actually says. Obviously Tucker can't work for anyone else, but he was able to publish this >>361995
and so he can still do a lot with social media. Since he no longer has any show to lose, he can be even more upfront now.
Fox was always apart of them
For the MAGA normies now it is official. Fox joined the dark side.
>Wow, what a scandalhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhUxZgGdOyI
Fox is leaking video clips to commie media in an attempt to embarrass Tucker.
Just to remind everyone of what this thread is about.
WEF's Young Global Leader darling Tulsi Gabbard interviews CIA Tucker Carlson.
>>362265>he thinks the CIA own everything
Thats a funny way to say jews buddy.
>>362411>darling Tulsi Gabbard
They are all playing in the same team while pretending to be on the side of the American People.
I don't get it, how can they fire him without releasing him from his contract?
Also, where does he intend to work next?
That's the point, as long as Tucker is under Fox's contract, he cannot work anywhere else and therefore is gagged for the 2024 election.
He could still do his monologues, but not for money.
That contract is bullshit though. Anti-competitive contracts are bullshit in all contexts.
Seems like the real test for the legitimacy of his convictions is whether or not he's willing to just say "fuck it" and do his show online somewhere free of charge. If I'm understanding it correctly they can't stop him from doing his show, they can just stop him from profiting. The guy has millions of dollars so it's not like he can't afford to go two years without pay, and as soon as the contract expires he can do anything he likes. There's nothing stopping him from just livestreaming his monologues unmonetized. Whether or not he's willing to if it comes to it will ultimately say a lot about where his heart really is.
>>362546>Seems like the real test for the legitimacy of his convictions is whether or not he's willing to just say "fuck it" and do his show online somewhere free of charge.>There's nothing stopping him from just livestreaming his monologues unmonetized.
I put all my chips on the idea that he is a CIA shill. And narrowing the globohomo actors' behavior on their common denominator, I believe he will do as the master mason says.
>>362892>He was going to go on the air and refute what that guy said on 60 Minutes.
I'm not buying it. If true he could go to Twitter, Gab, and even Rumble to spill the beams after his firing, but he didn't. Why it has to be only on Fox? Is it because of the money? I don't think so.
PAC Scam Alert.
The grifters are at it again.>Republicans need a new leader that can stand up to Biden. It's time to draft Tucker Carlsonhttps://twitter.com/DrafttuckerPAC/status/1659353182106009603>As Tucker’s attorney, I can unequivocally state that this PAC is unauthorized, that the people running it didn’t get his permission to use his name/likeness, and that it would be fruitless to contribute to such a PAC.https://twitter.com/pnjaban/status/1660096010734141441