/mlpol/ - My Little Politics

>>359943
>>359990
I'm not religious but the Bible was right all along. This shitshow has gone too far.
F

Women's logic vs men's logic.

>>360192
Anon you don't seem to know how bad things really are.
Women dressing up like that in your picture are a first sign of decadence. A Women who cares to much about her looks » Tight clothing, lavish hairstyle etc. It's a sign of lacking character, a sign of degeneracy.

See my pic. for a more accurate depiction of good females.

>>360210
Kinda accurate. Women should really only show off their bodis to their husbands in private, rather than seeking to subtly flirt with other men in public while later acting shocked that men could be so boorish.

>>360192
Here comes the most contrarian opinion on the site, I Like when they have Nose rings and Pink hair.
https://youtu.be/vfXs0m32A8E

>>360448
I also like trashy women. I have terribly low self esteem and I find the dumpster dived trashy bitches to be obtainable, thus more attractive.
I'm particularly fond of 80's/90's sluts with big hair. Before women got fatter and browner. Did anyone ever not want to fuck Kelly Bundy?

>>360448
>>360456
>trashy women
Naaaaaaaah.

>>360456
Absolutely Agreed, I'm in the same boat.
Kelly was one of the best.

>>360460
Ok Grandad

Do you see the pattern?

>>361431
Is it worse to have no children or to have mutts with a brown slut? Asking for a friend surrounded by easy Mexican women where White women are inaccessible aside from toothless crackheads.
I mean, I'm racist, but they're everywhere and so easy.

>>361433
That whore's eyes don't look mexican, but yes, she is mutt like her husband.
By the way, the husband is wearing a shirt of the Argentina's soccer team, so most likely they are another invaders usurping jobs in the government.

>>361435
>That whore's eyes don't look mexican
Believe me, they do. Almost all Mexicans are mutts, except for the dark skinned minority from Southern Mexico. Ones from Northern Mexico generally have a significant European admixture.
>the husband is wearing a shirt of the Argentina's soccer team
Makes sense since Argentinians are probably the biggest faggots in Latin America. Explains why he's a cuck.

Anyway, I ask because my friend has only slept with Mexican women because White women are unavailable in his area except for complete garbage fires.
Is having "white-passing" mutts worse than having no children or having children with a toothless crackwhore?
Will I go to horsefucker Hell for putting my meat in the tortillas of Mexican bitches? I promise that if my kids were like Nick Fuentes, I'd have them retroactively aborted, I swear.

>>361433
>Is it worse to have no children or to have mutts with a brown slut? Asking for a friend surrounded by easy Mexican women where White women are inaccessible aside from toothless crackheads. I mean, I'm racist, but they're everywhere and so easy.
I ask myself this question everyday., its the question of our times, it would depend o how old you are really, if you're old like 30 or something, maybe go for the spic whores, i would look down on you like i do other race mixers though.
T.Incel

>>361438
KEK

>>361437
>Makes sense since Argentinians are probably the biggest faggots in Latin America. Explains why he's a cuck.
I agree. To my knowledge, they are the biggest liberals supporting feminism.
Pathetic.

>>361438
Can I still be based if I've only had sex with Latinas? I've never had sex with a white woman, but I've slept with four Mexican women over the years through sheer happenstance. Will /mlpol/ bully me?
I don't seek them out or anything - it just happens. Must be part Spanish because I somehow managed to drunkenly stumble backwards into the vaginas of Latinas without even trying. I don't seek it out, but I take it when it's available. I'm a total dork and even I get have gotten laid.
Move to Texas, get a job and a vehicle, and don't be hideously deformed. You won't be an incel around Mexican sluts.
Just be warned that White women are wholly unaccessible unless you're wealthy, "educated" and know the right people. Unless you want the female equivalent of Ethan Ralph.
Not advocating race mixing, just being honest.
I'm mid 20's and must get my shit together and have kids before I get too old. If that means settling for a mestiza, then so be it.

>>361444
>I'm mid 20's and must get my shit together and have kids before I get too old. If that means settling for a mestiza, then so be it.
TBH, you sound like trolling.
Tainting your blood is the worst sin. And for what? Because you couldn't keep your dick in check?

>>361444
>Just be warned that White women are wholly unaccessible unless you're wealthy, "educated" and know the right people.
By the way, seriously. If you indeed want children, then I would suggest to stay as far as possible from these western "White Women", they are totally lost and are the equivalent of psychopathic demons. Get your shit together and rent a surrogate, then you won't have to share custody with any whore.

>>361445
>TBH, you sound like trolling.
I'm being half serious. It's true that I've exclusively slept with Mexican women and have never had access to the elusive White women.
I wanted to frame it in a way that wouldn't be met with outright derision by anons here because I'm genuinely curious if anons thinks it's worse to either have children with a degenerate White woman, no children, or knocking up a Latina. It's, like, Schrodinger's b8.

I want to be a father someday, but the odds that I'll be able to have that kind of relationship with a White woman that isn't a total piece of shit gets lower every year. I've had multiple relationships with Mexican chicks before I started shutting myself in and I wonder if I blew my chance at life by pissing away my past relationships.
>Tainting your blood is the worst sin.
Worse than being an incel retard that will never procreate and whose legacy will be seething on the Internet? I mean having half Mexican that are mostly White would be better than none, right? Plus, half Mexican and White kids aren't plagued by the mental illnesses that hapa abominations have.
>Because you couldn't keep your dick in check?
At the time, yes. Now it's more of a "grow up and have a normal family while you can" sort of thing.

Sorry for Nigel posting.

>>361444
>I'm mid 20's and must get my shit together and have kids before I get too old. If that means settling for a mestiza, then so be it.
Idk Man before I'd settle for some mexican bitch that would give me half breed kids, I'd consider moving somewhere else in Texas, i live close by in a neighboring state. maybe even considering to one of those. but that's just me though.
>Just be warned that White women are wholly unaccessible unless you're wealthy, "educated" and know the right people. Unless you want the female equivalent of Ethan Ralph.
That's rough man i feel bad for you.
>you want the female equivalent of Ethan Ralph

Ukrainian Refugee In Europe Has Interesting Theory On Female Relations.

Princess states her demands.

>>361857
Shit like this genuinely makes me sad, she wasted her youth whoring around and is now old and alone, I can relate to that in a way except I'm male and in my mid twenties its fucked up bros.
Its shouldn't be this way.
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/02/08/for-valentines-day-5-facts-about-single-americans/
https://web.archive.org/web/20230314172100/https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/03/29/share-americans-not-having-sex-has-reached-record-high/

>>361899
>Shit like this genuinely makes me sad
Don't be, they have what they saw. Women are unfit to take family decisions and are the first to expel the husband as soon as a new source of incoming, and with minimal strings attached, is available, for example the government. This is the rule, not the exception.

>>361899
>she wasted her youth whoring around and is now old and alone, I can relate to that in a way except I'm male and in my mid twenties
Shut up, slut. You chose to whore around and now you're having a quarter life crisis lol. No mare would ever want such a promiscuous man.

>>361899
These women have been fucking niggers and douchebags for decades. No regular man can fit the criminal profile that make them wet and therefore any man falling for their lies is fucked. Old damaged women like this one soon will switch target after the stupid decent guy's money while cuck him at every opportunity they have.
Modern women already tasted chad and because of that, they don't tolerate the regular guy, even worst, they hate men and are more than willing to cheat, lie, and hurt them as a revenge for not having the attention of chad. Yup, women are that psycho.

Women don't have independent thoughts, that's why soccer moms are getting AIs like ChatGBT to write their blogs for them:

https://shariblogs.com

I want to see if any of you can find the evidence navigating just from the homepage. I happen to know the keywords to search to find some of the worst articles that make it abundantly clear.

At face value it seems real and most NPCs will treat it as such.

Think about it.

Just saying.

>>362001
Cringe
>>362243
Based

I’m Proved Right (Again): New Study Shows Women Threaten University Ideal
>Almost four years ago, I looked at the problem of women in universities under the helpful heading Are Women Destroying Academia? Probably. This caused an international uproar when Professor Eric Rasmusen of the University of Indiana tweeted my article.
https://vdare.com/articles/i-m-proved-right-again-new-study-shows-women-threaten-university-ideal
https://twitter.com/erasmuse/status/1192591814567563266
----
>Are Women Destroying Academia? Probably
>Perhaps we need separate universities for males and females. They could socialize on campus, but they shouldn’t be the same seminars or even academic departments. Of course, this was actually the case in the nineteenth century, with Harvard and Radcliffe and Columbia and Barnard College.
>This divide is currently enforced—without the socializing—in some Islamic countries.
>Could it be that, even when it comes to academia, “Islam is right about women”?
https://vdare.com/articles/are-women-destroying-academia-probably

>>357253
this entire thread reeks of Unironic faggotry

>>362969
Would you mind to point at your posts? And if you didn't participate, then why are you cockblocking the shitposting?

>>362970
>then why are you cockblocking the shitposting?
Yeah, specially on a very low traffic site.
A have got some ideas, or either >>362969 is a woman, or a pathetic simp, or a commie infiltrator looking to discourage posting.

>>362970
>shitposting
I'm glad our Women's suffering is funny to you. kike.
>>362979
>He cares about the Women of his race's wellbeing he must be a simp
blow your brains out retard.

>>362982
>our Women's suffering
I don't follow.

>>362984
Do you think the genuinely enjoy their current state, superficially maybe, but deep down they are just as miserable as us.

>>362991
Yes, someone has to save the hoes.

>>362992
You are not redpilled on women.
>>>/ub/

>>362993
I'm more redoilled on women than any of you mgtow cucks in this thread

>>362997
>I'm more redoilled
Yes, you have to be, whatever that means.
On the other hoof, your bluepill mindset is showing. Go ahead, save as many whores as you can. I'm sure they will open their legs for you. /s

>>362997
Okay.
Some fags will never learn.

>>362998
>All White women are whores
Swallow cyanide
>>363000
keep coping if you want

>>363001
>All White women are whores
All women are whores. If you were redpilled you would know it.

>>363002
Even your mother?

>>363003
That's right.

>>363003
My mother trapped my father with me and sealed the deal with my sister.

>>363005
>>363004
ok why should i care what the son of a whore thinks?

>>363006
Well, if you think about it, anon is being realistic. Most are sons of manipulative women who targeted men with some money. Pregnancy is usually the method to extract those resources.

>>363007
Not mine.
You know for people who claim to be based, you all seem to have problems with your mothers, a mirror image of the women you like to criticize for "Fatherless Behavior"

>>363008
>Not mine.
Good for you, if you believe your mother's story.

>>363009
I have no reason not to believe it.

>>363008
>You know for people who claim to be based, you all seem to have problems with your mothers
>Assuming everyone on /mlpol/ agrees with this thread because it gets bumped
I hate the antinatalistic incel/misogynist shit, but I normally just sage. It's probably just a single butthurt anon that keeps this thread moving at all.

>>363006
By your own admission, you're the son(?) of a whore. As such, your opinion is disregardible, by your own position.
Congratulations, you have played yourself.
>>363018
Thanks for reminding to sage

>>363018
>incel/misgynist
You forgot racists, facists, bigots in your substanceless slurs.
>>363020
>As such, your opinion is disregardible, by your own position.
> by your own position.
How by his own position? Did you read something I didn't?

>White women
Guess what? I have an expression: "The best thing about black people is that you appriciate white people more."
I don't put my own people on a pedstal. We are kinda shit. But It's my race and I can't live without them anyway. Ontop of that, we're better than niggers and the like.

But I don't have to sit here and pretend as if the majority of white people are somekind of saints and shit. Fuck that.

>>363024
Who ever said white women were saints?

>>363028
Sure but my point remains. Waving around whiteness as a shield to say that we can't criticise them does not convince me of us being in the wrong in this thread.

On that note,
>this entire thread reeks of Unironic faggotry
so all the posts here are untrue then? Good to know.
This is why I'm being a bit harsh because you went out so hard yourself.

>>363029
This.

>>363228
>Third pic
<Even the fucking dog
I'm going to need some fucking proof of this.

>>363232
You won't get it.
It's an anti-White meme repeated by the retarded fans of CommonFilth. It spawned from incels assuming that if White women aren't fucking them, then they must be fucking dogs. Total subhuman 'humor'.

>>363240
>It spawned from incels assuming that if White women aren't fucking them, then they must be fucking dogs.
And here I thought it was a joke and no one believed that woman are actually fucking dogs. Who knew? You learn something new everyday.

>>363242
>And here I thought it was a joke and no one believed that woman are actually fucking dogs. Who knew?
>passive aggression
Being a snarky sperg here won't stop shitskins from fucking your women. Sorry if I insulted your e-daddy.

>>363242
Look, I know that you know this. You're just being annoying and pretending otherwise. You just have problem with this thread in general.

You seem, to me but you can tell me if I'm off, to be under the impression that we need them to survive. In a way you are completly right but you are wrong about how. Yes, do continue as a group we need woman to give birth to our children but does that mean we should appeal to them? Should we lie and say there's nothing to criticize about them as a biological collective?

The truth is that don't need to do any of this. Woman go to the men that seem the powerful and leave the weak. Meaning: If we're weak but appeal to woman's sensiblities, they won't come anyway. The reverse is true as well. If we're powerful, they will come even if we publicly speak ill about them.

Also, if we're going to have genuine relationships with woman, then one has to start with being honest with each other. Already there you can see the hypocrisy in our world. Woman can berate men to such a extreme degree today and end up being praised media for it. While if you state anything negative about one specific woman's merits, people will suspect you of sexism!!!

This thread is good because we men can get out our feelings and also share our perspective on the matter.

That's why I kinda dislike your behavior. You see this thread and only want to destroy it. Are there things in this thread that I disagree with, yes, but that's true for every thread. Why do you have a problem with a thread that offers space for men to discuss their issues with the biological collective known as woman?

>>363243
I don't follow, sorry. Can you elaborate?

>>363240
>It spawned from incels assuming that if White women aren't fucking them, then they must be fucking dogs.
Well, let me redpill you anon, White women, I don't know others, have a knack for sexual favors from dogs, this is not slander but an actual pattern. I know this first hand and was not an isolated incident.

>>363244
+1
This anon is properly redpilled and knows the score.

>>363248
The meme started unironically from CF fags. Just because Mary Sue would rather be spending time with her pets than with some hideous sperg doesn't mean that she's fucking the dog. I could, hypothetically, cherry pick instances of whales shitting bricks of gold. Doesn't make it a phenomenon.
The whole anti-woman thing is just just another load of shit meant to demoralize Whites. Congrats on falling for it.
It's kinda funny seeing the "White women fuck dogs" meme on a site that tolerates zoophiles lol. I guess White men (wish they could) fuck horses.

>>363251
>The whole anti-woman thing is just just another load of shit meant to demoralize Whites. Congrats on falling for it.
It is not a rumor, it is not a meme, as anon said above >>363248
, it is a pattern.
>anti-woman
KYS
Are you blind and brain damaged? Feminism, which is 100% anti-man, is embraced by 99.9% of women.

>>363249
Aww, thank u <3 ^^

>>363252
>Are you blind and brain damaged? Feminism, which is 100% anti-man, is embraced by 99.9% of women.
So, is your plan to save the White race being an incel shut-in that will never procreate?
I don't disagree that most women are degenerates, but so are the overwhelming majority of men.
Did you ever think to take a step back and ask yourself why things are as bad as they are? White women gravitate towards deleterious behavior because White men have collectively failed to do their part and ignoring a problem doesn't fix it. It takes two to tango, after all.
You and those like you could be part of the solution by improving yourselves and being the change that you want to see, but you instead choose to seethe and moan while rejecting any responsibility... Like niggers.
Incels being non-reproductive retards doesn't even bother me, it's that you types feel the need to spew your divisive and ultimately anti-White nonsense to others.
Profligacy knows no particular race or sex and all those who participate in such bullshit are all guilty. Assuming otherwise is foolish and is exactly what led us to the shitty state that our society is currently in.
Again, this misogynist retardation is counterproductive. Uh-oh, I said "misogynist," be sure to seethe about that, too.

>>363289
>So, is your plan to save the White race being an incel shut-in that will never procreate?
>Incels being non-reproductive retards doesn't even bother me, it's that you types feel the need to spew your divisive and ultimately anti-White nonsense to others.
Sounds like your projecting pretty hard. My closest friend refers to woman as sluts but his woman is pregnant.
Anyway, using big words like "deleterious" and "Profligacy" or maybe I'm just a dumb dumb ^^ won't mask the fact that a lot of this post is using shame-tactics to make us shut up about our criticism towards woman, not so much substance on where we're wrong. In fact:

>I don't disagree that most women are degenerates
Are we in agrement?
>White women gravitate towards deleterious behavior because White men have collectively failed to do their part and ignoring a problem doesn't fix it.
Okay, but if this thread is just wrong about everything it says about woman, then why would we need to take responsiblity for anything? We only need to take responsibility if woman are not are equals and if our points of criticism stands about them.

>You and those like you could be part of the solution by improving yourselves and being the change that you want to see, but you instead choose to seethe and moan while rejecting any responsibility... Like niggers.
Don't know really were this comes from. I haven't advocate for giving up or anything, I just have low opinion on woman.
I would even go so far to say that having low opinion of woman is being redpilled and by extension taking responsiblity by having a none-romanticist view on woman.

>Again, this misogynist retardation is counterproductive. Uh-oh, I said "misogynist," be sure to seethe about that, too.
Yes, I will "seethe" about it because you called us niggers with one hand and then judge us for being sexist with the other, without irony.

>>363293
Also, I want to criticise on this responsiblity talk for a bit. I will keep it short because I'm not in the mood to write down my whole rant about this.

This is not only you who have mentioned how men need to take responsiblity and stuff but I would argue that this is downright harmful.

I think there's a meme somewhere about how female self-help is: "You deserve this and that and this." While men self-help is: "You need to do this and that and this."

I think this is the reason for why so many commit suicide. The standrads for men are set so fucking high that men cannot reach them and thusly feel guilty about it. Men basically value themselves based on their level of production and a form of external validation based on that production.

It's always something that men needs to do. Compared to woman who can just exist and things will just come to them, men always have to prove themselves. Their value exist in what they can do, not in what they are.

While striving in desperation for these crazy ideals to get something, like sex or a gf, they might end up breaking.

The truth is that sex is just like water in that it's a thirst people need to sleek to survive. While you can survive without sex, mentally you take a blow. This is also why our currently none arranged marriage system doesn't work.

Men deserve much more and it's through this realization, you can find peace in all this chaos. It's not you who are wrong, it's the world.

Men needs to find value in themselves and not listen to the endless barrage of hate they get from every direction in our society.

>>363293
>Sounds like your projecting pretty hard.
Yeah, I love women so much that I won't even fuck them and have kids. You're a smart one, based incel. You should get a psychology degree, Dr. Freud.
> My closest friend refers to woman as sluts
Lol not really relevant, but that says almost as much about you as it does him. I guess his wife is a whore and his daughters will be, too. That's some good company that you keep. Disgusting.
>Anyway, using big words like "deleterious" and "Profligacy" or maybe I'm just a dumb dumb ^^ won't mask the fact that a lot of this post is using shame-tactics to make us shut up
I'm sorry if my big words offended you. By the way, being a bitter sexual and social failure is something to be ashamed of. Talk about projection.
>inb4 muh projection
Only total rejects hold the views you espouse. That's obvious to anyone that isn't a hermit.
>Are we in agrement?
Not really. I think one of the main reasons why White women are so fucked is because faggy White men are too spineless to do what's right. Society never would've degenerated to this point if good men hadn't remained idle as our values were eroded.
I could easily make a thread calling White men worthless because of cuckoldry/trannies/pedophilia/whatever if I really wanted to play devil's advocate, but that would be just as wrong for the same reasons.
>Okay, but if this thread is just wrong about everything it says about woman
I never said it was. I'm not trawling through a sea of lazily spammed boomer memes to realize that incel spergs are incel spergs, so I'm not going to pretend to understand the specific motives of every anon that has posted here. It all has the same outcome, anyway.
I said that it's an incel therapy thread that's ultimately anti-White. Prove me wrong.
>why would we need to take responsiblity for anything?
Your type whine that women are dumb commie whores who won't fuck them. Have you ever thought that maybe it's because some guys are not exactly a prize specimens?
Women are reactionary. 'Nuff said.
>We only need to take responsibility if woman are not are equals and if our points of criticism stands about them.
Complete and total ass-pull. Men and women are not isolated from one another. You sound horrifically demoralized.
Whether women are "equals" by whatever gay metric you want to use is irrelevant. It could easily be said that any White woman that pumps out decent Aryan babies is vastly more valuable as a human being than some random nerd on the Internet.
Would you consider yourself superior to a White woman that has born many children?
>I haven't advocate for giving up or anything,
You personally may have not done so, but this sort of rhetoric usually only leads one way and it's not some 'based' Stepford Wives fantasy or whatever.
>I will "seethe" about it because you called us niggers with one hand and then judge us for being sexist with the other, without irony.
And? How am I wrong for doing so?

You obviously have harsh opinions about women that I find to be self-defeating. Please, just ask yourself why you feel that way and contemplate about it... And be honest with yourself. You could be right or you could be wrong, but I'll hold out hope that you'll outgrow whatever this is. I genuinely hope you find a woman, fall in love, and have family. Hopefully you'll look back on this with shame.

>>359821
>I'd love to see the leaks / screencaps of this thread.
I hadn't seen your reply until today. Losing 8chan and 16chan was a terrible loss. I had only picked out a handful of things from the threads before the boards were shoa'd. :(
Anyway, don't want to focus on the negative, especially as that's what the enemy wants. I'm 95% certain that this is the mentioned thread (there might have been another thread elsewhere too) - it was heavily under attack by (((satan's allies))), so there's a lot of bot/NPC posts:
https://anonfiles.com/naI0wct5z4/based8chin_7z
Pass is: MareButtBestButt

>>363295
>Lol not really relevant
<Only total rejects hold the views you espouse.
Okay.

Anyway, there's so much more. I will go through this later, probably tomorrow tho.

>>363295
Yeah, maybe I used the word, "projection" wrong btw. What I meant was that you assume a bunch of stuff of the Anons here. So in my mind you projected your own ideas of us onto us sort of thing. But whatever, as I said, I'll get back to this.

Before I post this, I want to set the record straight. I'm not this guy: >>363252 that you were answering to if you thought so, I'm another guy. I just replied to your post on my own volition.

>>363295
>but that says almost as much about you as it does him. I guess his wife is a whore and his daughters will be, too. That's some good company that you keep. Disgusting.
Well, I don't think of woman as whores, and I don't think he does either, really, but I can agree with his underlining sentiment. Basically, female sexuality is to give their bodies to men in exchange for protection and care, essentially selling their bodies for power. I don't actually judge woman for this. Men's sexuality is to impregnate as many woman as possible and the ones with the best genetics for birthing and breastfeeding gets priority. One could argue that both these things are both ugly and good but I choose to just see it as an amoral sort of thing, it just is.
>By the way, being a bitter sexual and social failure is something to be ashamed of.
Not sure if I'm following but it's fine. I'll just interpret what you say here and you will just have to correct me if I'm wrong.
> a bitter sexual
I assume that's someone who hasn't had sex and blames everyone else for it. I mean feel like there are two sides to it. Yes, most of the time men who are single have options out there and they could make a greater effort into finding them. Tho, on that note. People have a tendency to make it out as if they don't make an effort when you know that they do. But sure, you can always do more and there a plenty of fish in the ocean and so on.
On the other side, woman have high standrads for their men today (well, they always had but...). But I think I'll get back to that later. But basically men have it significantly harder than woman.
Don't see why you would be ashamed tho. If people don't consent to you, there's nothing you can do. Ultimately, it's up to a woman to want to have sex with you so you can go through a whole life virgin at no fault of your own. Not saying that's what happens, we're human afterall, just using an extreme example to make a point.
> social failure
I thought this post was very enlightening:
>>363257 →
But in my own words, I'd say that I don't believe that anyone who is here has not been a social failure in their lives. The truth is that we can barely admit our thoughts and feelings to ourselves, much less to other people. Being social is in a lot of ways like lying. People are not themselves when they are with other people and they don't tell them the whole truth of how they really feel about things if at all. They don't talk about the things that's actually on their minds.
It's sometimes unwarranted but not always.
Telling my parents about my nationalistic leanings did not go over well. My father was more cool-headed about it than my mother, tho he didn't like it either.
From my perspective, spending time alone thinking about things is how you develop thoughts on your own instead of being drown by peer pressure into thinking like everybody else.
I don't thinkg there's anything to be ashamed of here. The world is wrong about almost everything so why assume that having a big social network is the same as success. If this is not what you mean with social, then I sadly misunderstand. I have small social circle, not because I couldn't do with more friends mind you, but because I can be honest with these people to another degree that I can with just an aquiantance. Although, such relationships are nothing to sneeze at either.
>I could easily make a thread calling White men worthless because of cuckoldry/trannies/pedophilia/whatever if I really wanted to play devil's advocate, but that would be just as wrong for the same reasons.
I feel like we sort of have those threads tho. We have the ugly mugshot of anti-fa folks, the tranny hate thread, and people on the alt-right's favourite insult is to call people cucks. ”Reee normies get off my board!” is also kinda of telling of what we think of the average white man. Sure, we don't have a anti-white man thread but men aren't as deleterious as woman are. Especially, considering there are people who will call you names for offering a different opinion about stuff, like you might be called a sexist and proceeded to be shamed by a person for that.

>>363318
>it's that you types feel the need to spew your divisive and ultimately anti-White nonsense to others.
Well ackshully. Last time I checked on r9k, it was filled with spam and other normie trash thread. I suppose that makes sense to some degree conisdering the board's theme, still felt off tho. Pretty sure I saw a meme about how the place was invaded once. The incel culture that was once there isn't really there anymore, it seems. Honestly, I thought it might be a good place to fish for the board since they might feel like they lack one now. What I'm saying might be wrong tho since I have had a very limited amount of time with that board.
But besides that, people will obviously spread what they believe in so it's not unexpected.

>I said that it's an incel therapy thread that's ultimately anti-White. Prove me wrong.
No. You're making the claim, you have to prove it. That's how thiat works. Why should I disprove every random statement you throw at me?

>Have you ever thought that maybe it's because some guys are not exactly a prize specimens?
>Women are reactionary. 'Nuff said.
Exactly my dude. Exactly. Woman are ruled by hypergamy because when they get pregnat they will have to stick with that kid for at least nine months so they have to be selective. Meaning, there will be a few men that get most of the woman. Couldn't have said it better myself.

>Would you consider yourself superior to a White woman that has born many children?
This paragraph that I picked this sentence from imakes me think that we're not on the same page.
But onto the question: Unless my impact as a political enlightent person grows. I would say that she's the one more useful for the aryan race's continuation but this is kinda my point. Woman are privliged for what they are. ”Woman and children first off the ship” kinda thing is a kinda of a through-line through the ages, I can imagine.
But if we're talking about equal rights, then men should have more rights than woman. I don't really believe in rights as a concept but if I did, I wouldn't want them to be equal.
Anyway, the reason I brought equality is becasue I kinda associate the words misogynist and equality with each other.

>And? How am I wrong for doing so?
Yeah, I feel like it's obvious ”how” and that you're just being a contrarian because you're angery at me or prideful or something. However, we could just not be on the same page. But couldn't you just as easily make the same arguements for why niggers dindu nuffin as you make for women and how it's actually white men's fault for letting this happend in the first place?
But besides that, you judge blacks (a biological collective) for their genetics but you think it's wrong to judge woman (another biological collective). So you're a racist but not a sexist, I guess.

>Please, just ask yourself why you feel that way and contemplate about it... And be honest with yourself.
I actually did. I took a moment for your sake and went through why I felt the way I felt. What I came up with was that, while I haven't been perfect in my life, it really wasn't so much about me. Some was but most of it just comes from my conviction in my beliefs because they seem true.

>but I'll hold out hope that you'll outgrow whatever this is.
>Hopefully you'll look back on this with shame.
That's sort a paraphrase of what people told me about my nationalistic convictions too.

But I don't feel like being personal man. I don't feel like this is really about me despite you, seemingly pushing our conversation there. I just believe in the things I do because they seem correct.

Anyway, thank you for these words. They were very kind.
>I genuinely hope you find a woman, fall in love, and have family.