/cyb/ - Cyberpunk Fiction and Fact

>>1867
The Phantom Time Hypothesis? https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qNBFGuJcc6I

>>1868
There are many clues and solid evidence that history is fake. So, to infer that the falsifiers are in possession of knowledge of previous civilizations is not a stretch.

>>1870
>There are many clues and solid evidence that history is fake
I pity that the OP of that thread is a faggot very hostile to any hint deviating from the mainstream.

>>1870
>>1871
If the Middle Ages of Europe were falsified, what about Charlegmane bullshit, Mohammed bullshit, Chinese bullshit, and so on?

>>1872
>what else is falsified?
An important detail to look for is who are the faggot writing history, and not the historical characters.

>>1873
Aren't the historical accounts by countless people alive at the time, and the archeological evidence of the deaths and structures and teeth and shit, looked at by historians today so they can tell when people of the past lied?

>>1874
>by countless people alive at the time
Ah, historical characters.

>>1874
>archeological evidence of the deaths and structures and teeth and shit
All of it interpreted and narrated by a selected clique of faggots and always funded by...?

>>1867
>It is speculation and skepticism about the technological leap.
So, no evidence or motive?
The technology clearly exists now, so it either happened recently (impressive), or it happened decades ago (even more impressive. This is really just splitting hairs.
>An undetermined past.
Well it can't be that far back. Maybe a decade at most, so corpos could ensure that they're the first to profit from the new tech. That much is probable due to corrupt patent laws.
>>1871
Why would they sit on this tech that they could be profiting, aside from corrupt patent favoritism?
The corruption is obvious, but otherwise there's little to be skeptical of. I guess there's probably a lot more yet-to-be-released tech that could improve quality of life across the world that corpos are still withholding to roll out in ways that maximize their profits at the expense of equitability.

>>1867
And here I thought it was something even remotely substantial.
I honestly prefer the cyberpunk dystopia over the schizos ever getting their way.

>>1878
The "Fake History" thread looks abandoned, then a good Tartaria discussion may ensue.

>>1876
Mainstream archeology funded by the jews, but we still have evidence that the holocaust never happened.
Ballpoint pens. Absurd testimonies. Wooden door gas chambers for delousing gas.
What evidence suggests the middle ages never happened?

>>1880
>What evidence suggests the middle ages never happened?
No idea about that subject, but I have knowledge of the World Mud Flood with no historical records.

>>1880
This.
I'm always open to skepticism, but unsubstantiated bullshit with not even a shred of evidence is just an annoying waste of time.

>>1882
>unsubstantiated bullshit
The Mud Flood is a solid, physical fact.

>>1883
I'm not talking about mud flood.
Anyway, this thread is about AI images. Make another thread if you want to have that conversation.

>>1879
>Tardtaria
It should be no surprise that Russians of all people had to come up with it. Such is the urge to downplay their shameful mongolian constitution.
>"Y-you see, they actually stretched all the way to the Americas! We aren't the ONLY rape-babies!"

>>1886
>they actually stretched all the way to the Americas!
Unironically, there are so many American towns with Russian names. I wonder why.

>>1887
>"I must always jump to the most far fetched explanation possible. Why would I consider anything else first?"
You lost the debate, your mind, and now. The trips!
Just call it quits already.

>>1888
>You lost the debate
Nope, there wasn't any debate to begin with.
>Just call it quits already.
>Trips
Okay, when I have time I will open a new bread.
I'm leaving faggots.

Have it your way, nigger.

>>1893
>blonde_hair blue_eyes female military_uniform bread
how did you get better bread results?

>>1894
You never heard of this guy?
https://twitter.com/murrlogic/status/1579306746740633601

>>1895
No. How did he get better bread results?

>>1896
Probably trial and error.
This autistic has been commissioning white women buying expensive wonderbread and clear-cutting forests for years now.

>>1897
What... the fuck?!
Can a fetish so bizarrely specific actually exist?
I once read about a clawfoot bathtub fetishist and met an acme looney tunes cartoon explosion fetishist (I asked if he liked irl explosions, he said no, those are ugly) but this is even more divorced from sex.
At least something technically explodes in bed. At least you can shag someone in a bathtub. How the fuck can this function as a fetish when it's so far removed from sex you'd be forgiven for assuming this is some kind of bizarrely specific wild animal or mother related trauma?

>>1898
Lmao, you didn't know about him already? The guy is a legend. He's spawned countless memes over how cringe he is.

>>1898
>How the fuck can this function as a fetish when it's so far removed from sex
It seems to be based on women expressing extreme arrogance derivative of wealth and power; you could consider arrogance to be effeminate in some measure.

>>1897
Kek I almost forgot about that guy. What champion.
>>1898
idk bro it's almost as weird as this one bizarre image board cult where anons have a tradition of posting mlp porn to pwn the shills. Crazy stuff.

>>1901
But the porn posting makes sense. It tells the shill "You have been found out. You are recognized as a shill and we feel no urge to respect you or follow normal rules of social protocol. We feel no need to pretend you're an honest person posting in good faith. Here are some digitized paintings of cartoon horse vagina. Posting gore to upset you would be more normal, something you're probably used to. You aren't used to pony pussy because you don't belong here. You fool nobody here and nobody here will take your side and call my posting of horse pussy unreasonable. You are outnumbered, now drown in the deluge of pony pussy."
It's better than teabagging someone you shot in a first persob shooter.
A fetish for bitchy rich girls is one thing but the wonder bread obsession makes no sense. Bread isn't sexual. Is it just his favourite type of bread or something?

>>1902
Go to his Twitter and ask him yourself.

>>1902
My point is that I think it's silly to be so surprised by some sperg's autistic fetish given where we are. If had the ability to do so right now, I'd try to use AI to make as much art of my extremely autistic pony fetish that literally no one else has.
>shills
The shill is immunized against all dangers: one may call him a scoundrel, parasite, swindler, profiteer, it all runs off him like water off a raincoat. But post horse pussy at him and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: “I’ve been found out.”

>>1904
Your pc can't run stable diffusion?
I wish I had a bizarre hyper specific fetish. If I had to pick something visual I'd choose big boobs but the AI is shit at big boob art. The areola is in the wrong place, the nips don't look right, the boobs are mismatched or misshapen. It keeps misinterpreting random body parts as boobs, too. Ask it for "thicc" or "large breasts" and it tends to turn random bits of flesh like knees and arms into boobs while making melty faced retard girls. Plus every fucking military uniform it generates is the same olive or blue thing. It's as if someone inseminated the training data with a million fullmetal alchemist pictures. And if I tell the AI to generate characters with Purple_Eyes it makes the military outfit purple, too. Or random parts of it. Stable Diffusion is fun but the world needs Stable Diffusion 2.

>>1897
Kek, now I understand the Wonderbread art pack theme. What a hilarious way to mock the guy.

>>1905
The world needs to be nuked back to the stone age.

>>1907
Humans have always been coomers. Even back in the stone age people were drawing tiddies on cave walls.

>>1910
He clearly made a typo. Not sure what you're implying.

Feds mad that you can generate realistic looking cp, racist depictions of violence, etc.
https://eshoo.house.gov/media/press-releases/eshoo-urges-nsa-ostp-address-unsafe-ai-practices
They want to censor AI.
Separate thread?

>>1912
I can get the cp concern, but the rest is bullshit. It'll be interesting to see what kind of precedent it would set if glowniggers somehow got to "regulate" (control) what people can do with AI.

>>1913
Even with the CP concern, it's hardly different than the lolishit that degens draw already.
I have seen a recent flood of it on pixiv though...
>It'll be interesting to see what kind of precedent it would set if glowniggers somehow got to "regulate" (control) what people can do with AI.
I bet you software licenses will be a thing in the near future.

>>1914
>Even with the CP concern, it's hardly different than the lolishit that degens draw already.
I hadn't even considered lolishit. I hate the shit and I'm convinced that only subhuman pedos are into lolicon/foalfon, but I don't think it'd be too far fetched that they'd push some narrative that AI is being exploited by diddlers and therefore they must exert control over all the software.
Just watch them use it as a bludgeon to push for even more draconian control over people.
>I bet you software licenses will be a thing in the near future.
I'm not very tech savvy, but how could they stop people from sharing open source software without making it outright illegal?

>>1915
Information collection, scare tactics, making it a nuisance to try having open source things.
The people who are hosting get pushed around till a glowie can snoop on 'ownerless' AI generated stuff.
They'd probably use it to generate fake paper trails, push bullshit and so on.
But, as a counter point they really want to finish a couple things.
The digital ID currency crap. The modified people are property clause. Finishing the Globalist world party. Defanging whoever is left.
Not so much as it'll deter them from going foward with such things, but as another shovel to the pile.

>>1911
you could say, im a grammar nazi

>>1914
Aren't software licenses already a thing for subscription services like untorrented adobe shit?
>>1910
Oh, sorry.
A first persobn shooter.
>>1912
Stable Diffusion 2 could be coded with a blacklist of words to ignore or replace with amusing words.
You tell the AI to make "oppai loli"? It gives you deformed AI generated horsecock and melty retard faces.

>>1918
Blacklisting is gay. Don't hamper the machine.

These aren't the best, but it's still impressive. Is there is anything good left in this world, it will be the advent and proliferation of ultra hd, hyper realistic pony pussy.
>>1921
Fucking amazing except for the stumpy leg.

>>1923
The SULTRY GAZES on those Foxes!

>>1582
I used to think it was unethical to prioritize profit in anything that was some kind of art-derivative.
But I think am absolutely okay with micro transactions at this point. Everything I can do or get away with to rape the whales is fair game.
Why should I care when everyone will dispose of me and my work the moment a decent AI comes around?

Funny how AI-art is so close to match Human art.
But there's still not a fucking burger-flipping machine. I hope machine learning fucks manual labour next.

>>1929
>I hope machine learning fucks manual labour next.
It's been fucking the working class for decades and now it's finally getting around to you worthless faggots. You mocked us, called us inferior, and constantly derided us. "Dey took ur jerbz," you'd mockingly post as our livelihoods and communities were destroyed. You deserve worse than this.
Kill yourself, faggot.

>>1582
I am a customer, so I welcome that.

>>1930
>It's been fucking the working class for decades
Not nearly as much as it should've, for the greater good I mean.
Don't agree? Show me the burger-flippator machine or stfu.
>called us inferior
Kek.
Sorry if I don't consider a brick-layer, menial fucktard as a prime example of the greatest qualities of mankind.
>our communities
Spoken like a third world shitskin.
>You deserve worse than this.
>You
Not even a drawfag.

>>1932
Dilate

>>1932
>as it should've
Wtf? Why is fucking the working class a good thing?
>Show me the burger-flippator machine
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KJVOfqunm5E

>First one to take the bait.
They're just not built the same.

>>1937
Not widespread enough, brainlet.

>>1940
You didn't say widespread. There are other examples of widespread automation.
Anyway, there's a clear trend in automation gradually and rapidly replacing jobs in all sectors. It has screwed the working class as jobs are eliminated faster than the economy can grow to replace them. It's not necessarily a bad thing that technology has been replacing those jobs, but to say it's a 'good' thing ignores some very real societal consequences of entire sectors of people being put out of work.
I personally welcome technology replacing the need for manual labor, in both industry and art, but I think people should think ahead about the long term consequences of jobs disappearing, so that we as a society can prepare to re-employ those people with new jobs created by technology.

>>1945
I still think it's fundamentally worse when Art is the target. Forget about employment. If a law somehow managed to end Art as a commodity it wouldn't even matter to me. I've considered Art as the soul and heart of what means to be human for a long time.
How many times have people said corny shit like.
<"Sure, machines are better than humans at a lot of things. But can a machine turn a blank canvas into a masterpiece."

No disrespect for manual labor, a lot of that is also a form of Art in a way. Uncle Adolf said there must be respect between those who work with their mind, and those who work with their body.
The fact AI or machine learning can eventually master every form of human Art might as well be the end of mankind for me. I think many people just forget that AI digital Art, was once as shit as AI writing currently is.
There is nothing that can be done about that. Technology gives and takes. It already killed the mystery behind chess and further diminished the role of creativity.

>>1950
Does AI art really do anything to diminish actual art though? It's not zero sum.
Also, it's worth mentioning that it takes a not-insignificant amount of creativity and persistence to make these images. On top of coming up with a prompt, you have to refresh the program hundreds of times over the course of hours to get satisfying images. That is an expression of the individual, even if it's generated by a machine.
I believe that AI art will usher in a new era of creativity and content/shitposting, where individuals are no longer limited by their personal skill at drawing.
>It already killed the mystery behind chess
Oh yeah. Big RIP for chess players. Even low-power programs are basically unbeatable at this point. It's like trying to arm wrestle the Terminator.

>>1950
>The fact AI or machine learning can eventually master every form of human Art might as well be the end of mankind for me.
Why does it matter though? We live in a nightmarish, dystopian hellhole that's only going to get significantly worse before it might even have a chance of getting better. Who cares?
Also, the human "spirit" isn't going anywhere when it comes to art and artistic expression. People will always find a way to make art in one way or another and AI has no effect on that. Do you really care if the shitty corporate calarts diversity portraits are made by AI?
The reaction to AI art reminds me of when buzzfeed journos were laid off and got told to "learn to code". Poetic justice.

>>1951
>On top of coming up with a prompt
>I believe that AI art will usher in a new era of creativity and content/shitposting, where individuals are no longer limited by their personal skill at drawing.
I apologize for being unnecessarily rude earlier. But, fuck...
Here we go again, over and over again. Do you seriously can't fucking grasp that AI art will most likely NOT be limited to digital drawing? It's like you didn't even read the fucking post.

>>1952
>Also, the human "spirit" isn't going anywhere when it comes to art and artistic expression. People will always find a way to make art in one way or another and AI has no effect on that.
It was perhaps the greatest stronghold of man against the machine. The one thing that was meant to set us apart. Sure you can still play chess...I don't even thing you get it. That or you're not arguing in good faith.
>The reaction to AI art reminds me of when buzzfeed journos were laid off and got told to "learn to code". Poetic justice.
Well I don't think journalism is a great example of the "human spirit", specially the kind of journalism we are talking about.

>>1960
>AI art will most likely NOT be limited to digital drawing?
What's wrong with that? It's more content creation. It's not going prevent people from making their own art without it. It'll just enable people to generate content very quickly. It still requires human input to get ideas in the first place.

>>1961
>It still requires human input to get ideas in the first place.
Bait or sheer retardation. That is kind of the gamble one has to make these days.

>>1962
It hasn't gotten to the point of generating completely original ideas that fulfill needs that people didn't even know they had.

>>1961
Am gonna try one more time just because people seem to be helplessly clueless everywhere I go, and thus I'm inclined to believe you are being serious.
Picture the following.
AI unironically starts writing novels better than anything man can conjure.
As I implied here >>1950
>I think many people just forget that AI digital Art, was once as shit as AI writing currently is.

Do you seriously thing a prompt is hot shit for that kind of AI?
>It hasn't gotten to the point...
<YET

>>1964
>AI unironically starts writing novels better than anything man can conjure.
Okay, but what's so bad about this? Sounds like it could be really productive.

Yeah, I figured it was bait. Great venting in the end, have a nice day lads.

Have a Fluttershy

>>1968
Thanks Karen, pretty cool.

>>1969
Based Karen

>>1960
>It was perhaps the greatest stronghold of man against the machine.
Machines are made by people and I'd consider them an extension of humanity in a way. There is no man vs dichotomy as far as I'm concerned. One should aspire to harness the glory of a big block V8 powering a computer that generates ultra realistic images of pony pussy while running over niggers.
>I don't even thing you get it. That or you're not arguing in good faith.
Reevaluate.

>>1971
>Reevaluate
You don't. Consider yourself victorious either way. It doesn't even matter.

So many cute poners

>>1972
Cheer up. Try considering the pros of AI advancing. Imagine no longer being beholden to artists to get your fix of mares.

>>1987
Based Veggie Tales right once again.

>>1985
>>1987
I should make the first randomly generated fire emblem game.
the music? AI generated. the plot? AI generated. every character? every level? AI generated. Fuck trying to write anything important with deep themes. I should start with the default template people expect from FE and then fill it with AI generated content.

>>2013
Fuck you.

.

.