/vx/ - Videogames and Paranormal

>>165040
>I'll keep calling him a flat earther, that'll get 'im!
You are welcome to persist, however you are wasting your time and effort. You havent grasped a thing and having a tantrum about it will only push you further away from the solution.
I've posed you a riddle, one that is easily solved with the most basic of metaphysical understandings. This isnt something one needs an initiation to grasp, anyone can do it. Consequently however, anyone can also prevent themselves from grasping it.
So I bid you good luck. But go on with the wailing and gnashing of teeth, if that's your preference.

Kabbalah is sorcery.

>>165042
It is a method of sorcery, yes.

>>165044
>thought provoking
I think we are veering off from the OP's premise: History is a Lie.

>>165106
Theres just one problem with your suggestion

>>165107
And... it is...

>>165108
This is my thread

>>165110
Ergo, it isnt that the post veered from "OP's premise", its that you never GRASPED my premise.

>>165111
Can you tell me what the premise is?

>>165113
Sure thanks for asking.
History is a Lie. This is becoming increasingly evident in observance of new and developing findings in Ancient History. This is further supported by an exhaustive non-oethodox decoding of every major religion, with emphasis on their Apocalypse 'myths'.
The Abrahamic church - in spite of having possessed one of the largest colllection of occult wisdom - the Bible, has manipulated it and the masses for far longer than even many critics and researchers have concluded, and is literally the inversion of the teachings of the man for whom we refer to today as Jesus Christ, as predicted by Revelations.
We are living through the last years that end ultimately in a cataclysm caused by an astrological event caused by proximity to the roving planet Wormwood/Nibiru/Planet X, which will cause great instability through chaotic weather patterns, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, and even the chance of an odd meteor strike or two.
The true religion taught by every tradition's progenitor was/is the pursuit of Reason and Emergence (enlightenment) and the true name of the Projenitor (in latin, for ease) is Lucifer, who is the opponent to the false 'god' who falsely claims credit for the creation of life and so demands servitude.
In a nutshell.

This thread is about presenting materials and content that recognize and/or indicate those findings.
The Apocalypse it's self occurs cyclically, andhas been suggested as possibky happening as infrequently as every 12000 years, or far more regularly, with the shortest estimate - impossible to determine afaik - as frequently as ever 300 years or so.
I have my own specific theories on that, but I have nothing concrete by which to indicate precisely.

>>165117
>The Apocalypse it's self occurs cyclically, andhas been suggested as possibky happening as infrequently as every 12000 years, or far more regularly, with the shortest estimate - impossible to determine afaik - as frequently as ever 300 years or so.
138 years according to >>157620
Last time was in 1902, and next will be 2040.

>>165118
2040 seems plausible, but 138 years seems... I cant refute it, while acknowledging that my personal doubts are immaterial. Hmmmm.
If you're referring to the Carrington event, Skeptic suggests that was a phenomenon that occurred without the presence of Planet X, and not having the earthquakes and volcanoes. Planet X is the kicker, as it is reported (Im using vage terms because I did THIS research like, 10 years ago) to be surrounded by a fields of effectively asteroids (as though it had gravitationally brought with it the broken off chunksof the earth that used to be where Antarctica is, which is the REAL reason theres the Antarctic treaty, as Ive suggested elsewhere). On Planet X' return visits, it is said to rain fire, and a single comet would cause biblical levels of flooding, as detailed in Skeptic's video(s) about the pyramids.

>>156447
Is this part of the history lie? https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qNBFGuJcc6I

>>165120
Its absolutely on topic, but your question is phrased unusually and Im not sure specifically what you're asking

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QDDZS5eUlRY
2016
Because spoon feeding won't do itself because then it wouldn't be spoon feeding.
BEHOLD CORN! EXPLANATIONS!

>>165131
That's Bear Heart in the video not me, just so there's no confusion.

>>165131
>>165132
While spoon-feeding is not compulsory, if there WERE a thread for it, this is definitely it

I'll take a moment to talk about oblate sphereoids, aka the Earth. Id do this in the flat earth thread but,... well....
The thing about oblate sphereoids - and Im correcting previous posts on this one - is that the radius of the sphereoid is GREATER below the equator; the planet is infinotesimally (when compared to a true sphere) pear-shaped.

Im not gonna try to vet/validate this position, Im going to assume that mathematical geniuses far beyond my ability werent NASA/Masonic/buffoons.
Have you ever broken a magnet before? Have you ever observed how when you break a magnet, its center of magnetism and reactivity changes?
I assert that the planet is no different. The premise is, the earth - countless years ago - was a larger sphere than we currently experience.
The idea is that, the moon we currently know was a planetoid in orbit around planet X. Being respurceful, thelifenon Planet X eventually made efforts to colonize ther (to be our) moon, hollowed it out, and made it to operate in a manner they could control.
At this time, much more of our solar system was inhabited and inhabitable. Venus and Mars, for example, were teeming with life with sustainable atmospheres.
The average life lives was of plenty.
Depending on the accounts, early 'humans' were genderless, and the atmosphere of the planet was lush and tropical.
Planet x would have and did make it's 'however frequent' fly by's, but did so innocuously; its orbit was enough outside that of the Earth's that its fly-by's avoided causing any catastrophe's.
But.
It was discovered by the residents of Planet X, that if they were to manipulate the orbit of our now-moon, they could cause the moon to collide with the planet Earth.
And ultimately, the did. Some ancient traditions - spicifically, that of Credo Mutwa - maintain (through a horrifyingly demanding oral tradition) tha at the time 'they' (from planet x) brought down a 'great stone' into the oceans, feom which the oceans became salty.
Yes, prior to the moon collision, the oceans were freshwater. Not sure the logistics of that, just telling the story.
Now, the collision was cataclysmic, even beyond what is pften rederred to ITT. The planetaey orbits previously, in unbroken alignment, was upset. The earth magnet got a big chunk broken off. Additionally, the moon and the earth the began to operate in magnetic harmony. Thenproximity caused the moon to fixate itsorbit on the eart rather than planet x. While the broken off chunks of the eart got sucked up in X's gravitational field and fucked off with it.
The stable orbit of the moon (populated by those from planet x)allowed the earth to be colonized, and eventually conquered by the denizens of X, who using genetic modification caused the engendering (literally, the separation into gender, some male some female) of pre humans.
Meanwhile the Earth - previously maintaining a stable and independent solar orbit - suddenly was operating in tandem with the moon, and upset by a gaping lass of mass (present day antarctica). The sphere that the planethad been was now kore acorn-shaped, butbecause of its interconn3cted gravity/orbit with the moon did not have the unadultered gravity field that would ALLOW the planet to acieve equilibrium and bring the planet backnto a spherical shape.
And that says nothing of what happened to life on Earth.
It is from this pccurrence that we are brought to thepoint of the first creation stories.
Here, we have an infantile pre-human race, interacting with beings of vast technological capabikity, who presented themselves as creator Gods. This was the Garden of Eden.

How many years ago was this? Impossible to account for. My rational mind wants to put it somewhere around 50000-100000 BC, but thats a generalized estimate.

>>165131
>Kaballah isn't owned by Jews

This is going to be an interesting watch.

>>165131
That video quality is so shit, but it looks like he manipulated the tree diagram to make it fit the cross. It doesn't actually fit if you draw it as it is in the actual Kaballah texts.

>>165131
>can't figure out why someone would suggest Pluto as the crown
If only there was a clue. Again, doesn't fit great on the original symbology, but it is more evident than his drawing would imply.

Wonderful, we are getting into Spirit Science territory. Remember, all of this is discovered because he drew Jewish symbols on the Kabbalah tree. Super-secret stuff here, folks. You couldn't get more accurate if you tried.

See, the key is to wear it as a necklace, and you get spirit armor buff +3.

Overall, not much was said. When you have a diagram made by Jews to house Jewish symbols that to them means the makings of the universe, then yes, when you draw the schizo symbols inside the diagram, you get back out the schizo answer that was programmed into it. The third cross comes out of nowhere when it should be the largest of the three, since it represents infinity and not just escaping the limits of the body, yet it is smaller than the Star of David. Funny how that works.

I won't get into how this breaks Bible canon because clearly that doesn't matter to this guy, and this thread has already dismissed it... despite needing it to explain aspects of this theory. I will just point out internal inconsistency and save Bible ranting to the Bible thread.

>>165142
>The third cross comes out of nowhere when it should be the largest of the three, since it represents infinity and not just escaping the limits of the body, yet it is smaller than the Star of David. Funny how that works.
Yeah it's almost like going beyond the limitations of the astral and physical and beyond limitations itself is kind of hard to put to scale the immensity.
>Was going to post why the relations between the planets do the things they do, but
<there's a magic thread for that, also you could do the whole self experience thing.
>Also why banishing stuff is related to those geometries (relations between the planets) however it's tangential to the last video of the history things
The point is the magnetic field mimics the astral inside the limiting field. As in planetary bodies and the related associations correlate.
Now then the whole green man thing is the manifestation (alternatively the description for the phenomina matching correlations to behaviors and making of things) of the Sol center.
Where you try to imitate the savior figure(s) because you have it in you to do so.
>>165139
Because Pluto does alot of other stuff that only Pluto can do excluding Uranus.
>>165137
Riddle me this, why would pathological liars, swindlers, torturers, abusers and etcetera put so much emphasis on the LIMITATIONS.
Why would they try to limit you? HMMMMMM.
It's almost as if their whole existence is centered around misusing Saturn.
Switching tracks here.
In political ponerology there are the pathological individuals and groups, and the essentially NPC SJW types, with a dash of useful idiots.
The nasty enslavement rituals they are doing to everyone along with the mass killings.
Ah but here's the kicker they have a prebuilt means of negating many peoples efforts. People don't try. When someone does they use everything they have to exterminate and or make an example of them.
Three things.
They keep gathering up the 'weights' till they know it will crush someone, only then do they drop the 'weight'. All in one go.
The other.
They place 'weights' that over time will cause you to destroy yourself.
The last is they unbalance (damage) you making you more ineffective.
So what's the point?
Just as they abuse what is going on they have several weaknesses.
Transplutonian beings (beings from elsewhere basically alien thought/beings) despise the Sun. Your heart center, and by extension the Crown.
Here's a big spoon feed in a tiny package.
Why is Pluto able to go outside and inside and be a funny?
Why are you able to go beyond?
Why do (((they))) want to stop your voice? (Three locations, the speaking, the medium between, the reciever.)
Listen to the Bee and Spider vision.
One BODY many heads, the nature means you must use the Light (FIRE) in your Sol.
This is by no means the only way, just one which uses two of the accessible topologies in tandem.
The answer is everywhere and all the time. Even and especially to the highest Creator.

>>165141
Based. Would it stack with my +3 Ring of Protection though?

>>165145
I hate this post, but technically speaking yes, it does stack, nigger

>>165146
Nice. Once I have them both I'll be invincible.

>>165151
The thing is the point is to game the system to make a character worth remembering and can survive and thrive in the next expansion.
While yes it does stack, but is it enough?
Depends on the situation.
Some of the stuff is an impenetrable beam of fuck off. For a while. Everything sees the beam of fuck off and knows your location. They can't really do anything while the beam of fuck off is going on, but most people don't have the beam of fuck off on all the time.
Walking in blaring air horns gets attention. If you have all the stuff set up you'll be set grinding on a battle of attrition. You'll win, but it eats up some of your actions to keep the stuff going.
The short and simple answer there's different levels of into it you can get into.
Least depth tend to just have what ever going on and it's a mystery. Stuff still tries to affect you, but it's... not as direct or potent per se. Barring the wacky shit going on.
Getting in over your head pulling a Leroy Jenkins (if he forgot what most of his skills did or were or to even use them) tends to have wack stuff happen sometimes they sink sometimes they swim.
Kinda need to know enough stuff. Groups tend to cover each other and get stuff started (if it's one of the good ones... if you find them or they find you). The gnarly ones, lets say toxic possibly glowing, possibly ((())), possibly toplevel dickery and asshole like stuff to say the least.
With that said sneaky sneaky is pretty great doing it right. Normal shit is normal and stuff that is good for you and good to enjoy comes along with no fuss or muss. If there is its been looking for you or it accidentally bumped into you somehow. Red alert dude.
So make sure you know what you are capable of and what suits you personally and things that everyone can do.
>Basically congrats.
>The astral is AnCapistan
Or if you prefer an anarchy survival multiplayer minecraft server with jank ass modifications where some of the fags there IRL mail you shit somehow.
Thing is you start with all the McNukes. You have a decent(ish) thing going on there(s). The thing is the trouble is there's some shitbags making the place all laggy trying to scam you.
Some of 'em try to raid or steal shit or throw a wrench in you or your plans or whatever else.
If you get shit secure and productive there in AnCap Astral lands it goes and merges with here. Stuff happens fast. You can accelerate many of the things by just doing it now. Right now, now.

>>165177
>>165151
Thanks I now know I'm going to be making Anon AnCap land with Ponies in 'uncharted' yet easily reachable Astral space.

>>165184
>illumination
A very common term it seems. /s

>>165185
It should come as mo surprise given that Lucofer literally means 'light bearer'

I hate this cell phone

>>165177
Hmmm, maybe my skirmishing, high-speed ticklemancer build might not be good enough then. I might have to raise my defenses to safely get into booping range.

>>165111
The point is that you're a dicksucking tranny faggot. There's nothing to grasp. You just want to jack off all over yourself and act smart when you're probably the dumbest cocksucker on the planet.

<You, in case that wasn't obvious.

>>165227
Is this supposed to make ME look bad?

>>165111
Since when are OP's in charge of what direction a thread goes in? Once the conversation is started there is no control or 'premise' to be had. That's how threads work on chansites.

>>165229
Are you suggesting that thread hijackers have rights? That when anon decides to wade in, whether honestly or disingenuously, they have a say about what a thread 'should' entail?
Anon is free to make his own thread, but he will not hijack mine for something beyond it's purpose. Especially in light that anon hasnt been cultivating this thread for almost a year. Begging your pardon, but you are wrong innthis; bot logically AND in keeping with "chan tradition".

>>165230
>rights
Nobody has "rights". It's a chansite. People go off-topic with dude conversations all of the time. They always have and always will.

>>165231
*Side conversations

>>165231
At which point it is up to OP to insist on the intended purpose of a/the thread.
Which is what is happening now.

>>165230
>he will not hijack mine for something beyond it's purpose
I think he just did.
>"chan tradition"
The "Chan tradition" is that OP is always a faggot and Anons make whatever they want of the thread. The only way to keep a thread on-topic is to keep people interested in aforementioned topic, or remake it later.
Heck, it happened all of the time on /mlp/, and it especially happened all of the time on /pol/, /b/, and other derivatives of this site. That's how content gets made.

>>165234
The hijacking stands at 'contested'. HIS contest is a series of arbitrary insults, with no care, measure, or interest in the content.
Anon needs to lurk more, at least ITT. He has already displayed an inability to grasp the thread topic, and when indicated he sperged like a faggot. Hardly keeping, in that sense.

OP is always a faggot, as is tradition. Everyone loves a good dumpster fire.

>>165236
>gotem
Meanwhile, OP in this case has a distinct and lengthy ibtent for what to post ITT. And then theres anon who wants to post a thing. I cant STOP anon from posting a thing, but I can oppose it, alluding to the intended direction of this thread.
Does anon's posting tend to develop the thread topic/discussion, or is he a fly-by-night? If the latter, am I wrong in resisting the hijacking?

>>165237
>shit posting semantics
Sounds pretty gay. Maybe not take the bait, silly billy. You're smarter than this.

>>165238
>lurr, I was trolling and u got BAITED
So, by that logic I should just let the thread be hijaced without contention in order to as you suggest 'not take the bait'?
Uh huh, sure. Fuck off with that "I dont have a position, except contrarianism to whatever is said in response" bullshit. If you wanna have a row and try to stir up drama, thats your business; kindly start your own thread.

Ha! The master baiter got baited!

>>165237
>am I wrong in resisting the hijacking?
Yes, unironically.
You're coming off as a tremendous faggot and making a fool of yourself by acting like shitposters are going to afford you even a shred of respect for complaining about it, when all that actually does is encourage further shitposting.
>hurr durr stop derailing muh thread
Literal just ignore them. Talk past them. Just post what you came to post.

>>165239
>"I dont have a position, except contrarianism to whatever is said in response"
I just got here lmao. Keep stabbing in the dark.
>If you wanna have a row and try to stir up drama, thats your business;
We wouldn't know anything about that, would we?
>>165240
Obligatory picrel

>>165241
I disagree, but you make good arguments. Ill consider your position while dealing with faggots who thing that shooping me with faggots somehow makes me a faggot, in a thread about how history is a lie.
Are you seriously suggesting I just shrug and say "well shucks, thats anon for you, guess Ill just let my thread burn"?

>>165242
True colors shown

Understand:
This lies at the heart of why so many content creators have fucked off from the aite. Free speech is a thing, butwhen onepersn is allowed to - with minimal effort - disrupt the effects of anons wo actually care about what they produce, they tend to fuck off.
Golly, thats worked so well so far.

>>165240
Is it getting baited to point out youre being fired upon, and take exception? U lot have a weak definiton of baited

>>165242
If you're going to shitpost, at least do it with ponies instead of niggercock.

>>165243
>faggots who thing that shooping me with faggots somehow makes me a faggot
It's funny and it seems to work. I thought you were smarter than this, but you're not, are you? Perhaps it elicits such a reaction because you're not arguing with anons, but rather your own repressed homosexuality. OP remains a faggot. Total narcissist.
>>165244
>True colors shown
From the guy that tried to fail dox an anon and ousted one of his "friends" as a NEET. Ram Ranch is under fire. Silly snake.
>>165247
It was just the first thing I had available. Posting pics of yourself on an image board for validation is gay and you will be made fun of for it.

>>165248
In what way doesit 'seem to work'? Are you making an argument? Are you providing counterpoint and insight? Are you offering authoritative sources that debunk my position?
Or
Are you a faggot who has faggot porn on his pc and decided to mix and match?
>fail dox a neet anon
Citation please
>>165248
>I couldnt help it, anon cropped himself out of the image and I just HAD to uncrop the image, and then merge it with the faggot porn I have, dont ask
Mmmhmmm

To those:
If Im to not care about what hapoens to this thread, what incentive to I have to produce?
If Im not to respond to misrepresentations and detractions, what business has ANY OP to post?
Ngl, you're aeguing toward a slippery slope that ends with the LITERAL death of the site. While certain admins are okay with this as long as the 'sit on the throne', Im not.

Remember, this ISNT 4chan. They kicked us OUT. Its a poor move to insist on emulating them

Imagine being beset on all sides by the iniquities of the selfish and the tyrrany of evil men, and being told "lol, just dont post"

>>165249
>Are you providing counterpoint and insight? Are you offering authoritative sources that debunk my position?
Point: You're a fag. Please, adhere to your own standards and prove that you aren't a queermo.
>Citation please
You must have recently taken your estrogen, thus explaining why you're being a faggot. You tried fail doxing a guy for saying Texas isn't a super based, trad paradise, and you deleted it quickly thereafter. You've also flaunted your familiarity with staff multiple times and boasted of knowing Atlas. Says a lot about you, really.
>authoritative sources
Yes, your own posts that anyone who's been here for five minutes could easily recognize. They paint a picture of you sucking cock. There's a search bar and anons can use it.
>>165251
Remember, this ISNT 4chan
No kidding. "We" are better than them.
>They kicked us OUT
Half true. Whomever started /mlpol/ proper is deserving of all the credit, 4cuck aside. It's an April Fool's joke gone wildly astray and I love it. P.S. There is no "us". You should know better.
>>165252
lol. lmao, even. Read your own narcissism blog thread.

>>165253
>You tried fail doxing a guy for saying Texas isn't a super based
Uhm, actually I didnt. Idk what you're on about
>flaunted familiarity with staff
I was staff (emphasis was). Unlike every ex staff who has come and gone, I havent gone because I STILL care about the site. Go ahead and tey to imply that thats bad.
>Yes, your own posts that anyone who's been here for five minutes could easily recognize. They paint a picture of you sucking cock. There's a search bar and anons can use it.
You're having an aneurysm. Stay calm, lie down, and take deep breaths. Call 911, youre gonna get through this.
>Whomever
Uh, his 'name' is Atlas. We worked together, I can tell u his IRL name. There was a plan, once; this wasnt it.
>lel narcissism
Clearly you havent perused lest you would rwalize what role you're relgating yourself to. Please, carry on 'btfo'ing' me

And as a welcome BREAK to the shitstorm that has coalesced, allow me to suggest an idea.

In mythology, Atlas is the BROTHER of Prometheus.
Which is to say, the one who upholds the world is the brother of he who provides light t the world. And what IS light, in a historical/mythological constraint? Reason, knowledge, and determinism.
Which, btw, is why so many of you fail.

>>165254
>(emphasis was)
Yeah, lol. I played highschool football. I'm so cool!
>I can tell you his IRL name.
There you go again. Tell us all about it or shut up. Your regular clout chasing is gay and womanly.
>Oh, I sucked his dick one time! I matter!
(You)
>Clearly you havent perused lest you would rwalize what role you're relgating yourself to.
Whatever role "relgates" itself to calling you a gay hypocrite.
>Well, if it isn't the consequences of my own actions!
Niggas, probably.

>>165245
You do have a tendency to constantly and immediately provide illegitimate posters with as much satisfaction as they desire.
>>165251
Yeah, 4pol, where posters enable trannies and feds to waste everyone's time.

Seriously, try jewtube, more specifically the nu-/his/fags. Even wow-mao. You don't even know what a troll/shitposter/raider is, the best image-boards are normie-tier at this point.

>>165256
Apparently you learned less in your time in HS football than I learned in my time in staff. Feel free to postulate about football in /sp/, while I relate about staff on the site that the staff is intrinsically associated to.
>suggesting veritas is clout chasing
Theres no winning with some people.
>I sucked dick one time
I really hope youre in a comparable position, so you can see how ridiculous your position is. Would you have that I NOT have financially insulated the site for years? Would that have been better? And, after having done so, would you have me NOT give a shit about the site? Foolishness.
>Whatever role "relgates" itself to calling you a gay hypocrite.
Says anon who has plenty of gay porn to post 'ironically'
Ffs, I said it before: if you want to go, make a thread, Ill bite. But fuck off from this one, I have business to attend to.

>>165257
Ho-ly-SHIT a relevant point.
1. Yes, I respond to trolls more than is functional. I will continue to do so, because the state of the thread/site matters to me. Though, I recognize that thats an exploitable weak point, so maybe I WILL let the site languish just so I can lord(?) Over nobody that mlpol is dead. That sounds exciting.
You would have me neglect my agreements. I dont. Why is this an acceptabke strategy for (you)?.

2. This is practice. I have dealt with, and WILL deal with, individuals far more objectionable than you. That I do so with you is a matter of good practice, its not personal.

>>165259
>Why is this an acceptabke strategy for (you)?
Because you can't beat someone on the internet who CAN'T even take himself seriously.

I mean it, internets tactics have evolved and image-boards are stuck in their old ways.

>>165260
Say what now?

>>165259
Also.
>so maybe I WILL let the site languish just so I can lord(?) Over nobody that mlpol is dead. That sounds exciting.
Stop with the Messiah complex, if posters are too thin skinned to handle it, they aren't worth the worries.

>>165261
>you cant beat
On no no no, thats not true at all
>>165262
Thats a very good point, Ill take it to heart

Meanwhile, if everyone has had their fill shitting on me, I have a thread/purpose/intent I would like to get back to.
I mean, if anon wants to beleaguer/hijack threads, there are PLENTY to choose from, on mlpol or beyond.

Assuming a modicum of decorum, we'll begin where we left off
https://youtu.be/KHC4mSUMrBk

>>165258
>Would you have that I NOT have financially insulated the site for years?
No one cares. We get it: you think you're important on the Internet. Your shekels don't matter and neither do you. Cry about it. That's really the crux of things: you can't help but inflate your own ego.
>I-I'm so important- I have money to the site!
Do you want a special sticker or something, pay pig? Very gay.
>Anon made fun of me and posted an image where I'm shopped into porn! Clearly he's gay!
Keep seething. I'll be sure to make more some time and shit your thread up further with a deluge of you sucking cock. It really strikes a nerve with you. You're obviously a gay tranny that wants cock. Too bad you'll never prove you're not.

>>165266
Nigger, go home. I didnt make citations cuz >important, I made them cu, U said >irrelevant. My money is relevant, fuck off.
>pay pig
Uhm, seriously get fucked. Like, if you wanna fault my posture, sure. Ur not gonna shame me for supporting the site. Like seriously, unequivocally, suck your own prostrated asshole.
>keep seething
>I'll be sure to make more some time and shit your thread up further with a deluge of you sucking cock. It really strikes a nerve with you. You're obviously a gay tranny that wants cock. Too bad you'll never prove you're not.
This is what passes for a reasonable response for some people. Im neither castigating nor supporting. This is anon, may he reign in perpituity.

How tight do you think Maud's clenched ponut is? I'm thinking she could squeeze at least 13k-25k PSI, based on the force needed to crush a two inch diameter piece of granite.

>>165267
>Nigger, go home.
No. I'm best friends with all the staff and we all go out for gyros and beer together. Cry faggot. This is my home.
>shame me for supporting the site
Nice strawman, faggot. Keep dancing around like you always do. It's good entertainment.
>>165267
>she keeps seething
Come out of the closet. We'll all accept you and validate you, especially your money.

>>165269
Yes, keep shooping gay porn. It totally reflects on me, when you try to defame, nevermind u being elbows(?) deep in gay porn.
Have YOU supported the site (excepting your gay porn)? Its a distinction, even if small
Kidding aside.
Say whatever you will. Malign me however you will. Twist/meme/distort however you will. It wont change me, and it wont change you.
>>165268
Elway, please

Meanwhile

The point of this thread is to illusteate how history has been misreported, examples of such, etc. Im not communicating effectively because Ive had a few.
But what about staff?
Yes, Ive made essentially all enemies, but such that they would be derelict? When I was on staff Lotus prescribed harsh words/dealings for a person deliberately derailing a thread. I didnt, but that was his advice.
Funny how positions shift.

So.
Whats it gonna be fellas? Are u gonna fuck off to your own threads, or am I gonna have to get nasty?

>>165272
By acting like a bitch you are inviting trolls.
Be more like Flat Earth's OP, he is immune to them.

>>165273
I couldnt parody this statement anymore if I tried

>>165274
>parody
Suit yourself. I tried to help you.

>>165270
>Have YOU supported the site
By buying over two thousands flasks and taking the mods shopping at Cabela's with $2k each. Too bad you missed it. Pay pigging is absolutely valid for internet points.
>>165271
>Anon, I love it when you shoop me into gay porn! It totally means you're gay!
Then what about the sweet love I made to your ass at your brother's Ram Ranch? You said you loved me and wanted to be my wife and that you'd take care of the cats.
You guys should have been there. He did an Applejack voice and everything.
>>165272
The last time you got nasty, you practically sucked the cum right of me. You even wore the mare suit and everything. Please, anons, let him get nasty.

>>165270
>Elway
Flattering, but no.

>>165275
>i tried to help
>be more like flat earth OP
Its one or the other, and in your words

>>165277
It was a shot in the dark, I apologize for my gamble

I'm outta here.

>>165247
^^^
>>165265
Yeah if you look at stuff things occur. As a book it's a book. It does matter the medium, such as letters or poems or retranscribing spoken words changes the context.
When old people recall sometimes differences occur.

>>165276
And you are?

>>165281
To this end I ask poignantly.
If my thread can be overrun with derailment, whats protecting the rest of threads?
Staff?

I know there are plenty who are jerking themselves at the idea that Im finally gonna be given what for, but edge yourself for a moment.
None of this reflects on me. All of this reflects on what the site permits, and who the site permits.
Food for thought.

>>165282
Can't believe you forgot me. You said you loved me. It's okay,you fucked a lot of us that weekend.

Nothing says "Im right and ur gay" like spending hours pouring through gay porn and then editing gay porn to suggest someone ELSE is gay

>>165276
>Exhibit A a fag.
>>156447
>Exhibit B OP.
>>165283
Community veto when enough is enough. Some things have low veto amount verse other posts which have higher veto amounts.
IE bots and spam is automatically vetoed.

>>165287
Ive literally advocated for a community veto, but the problem is it could be brigaded.

>>165285
Nigger faggot stop uploading your gay porno collection it's no longer 2010.

>>165289
Hey now, I was much alimmer in 2010

>>165287
>Community veto when enough is enough
Spoken like a true commie. Why do you hate the White race? I'd be interested in seeing how you decide who is and isn't part of the "community".
>>165289
Readily posts again to hate me making fun of niggas for acting similarly to niggas. Cry about the gay porn. I'm taking requests. If you want his head shopped into pony shit, then post the base image and I'll do it.
Clearly the Ram Ranch Discord brigade has arrived.

>>165288
It's not a formal veto but an "invisible iron hoof stamping out of the shadows once locked on".
Calculating organic social criteria is a sociologists perview or human resources. Where as shooting from the hip while organic and being used in robotic strikes is not possible for robots or shills.

>>165291
What postures as the 'reasonable' side of the exchange
All kidding aside, its clear that nothing I intend will come of this thread, so I request - as OP - that this thread be closed. Ill take my business elsewhere and you lot can sit and spin. Agreed?

Here's the head crop for anyone that might want it for future usage.
>>165293
Literally just stop being a fag. Hell, I don't even dislike you, but you had to have known this would happen eventually given the nature of the site and your posting patterns.
It would be interesting to see if they closed this thread at your behest.

>>165294
Whatever you gotta tell yourself, anon

>>165295
Actually, this DOES present an opportunity.

Id like to take this opportunity to apologize to a poster who I have gone too far with on on several occasions. His name is irrelevant. His flag is irrelevant.
I didnt mean to be abusive, but I have been. I didnt mean to bully, but I did. I didnt mean to disregard, and yet what now?, and I didnt mean to offend. Or rather, I did, and thats the beginnings of what Im apologizing for. Cheers, author who has written about FoE and a certain distant Apple family descendent. You are far more respectable than this asshole here >>165294 and Im sorry it has taken this experience to cement the idea.

I want Maud to crush my dick like it's an amusement park penny.

>>165298
>>165297
>he got hoisted by his own petard
Good. Perhaps Nigel will forgive you. He shouldn't, but whatever.
To anyone that's been around a while, this is the usual cycle of apologies that is regular for the Nigga when he feels cornered.
>>165298
I want Maud to crush my cock so hard that it turns into a diamond.

Well, shit.
Seems like we've finally come full circle. First, Niggel stops being a complete faggot. And then, well...

Mares and Gentle Colts, that's! How a saga that has drag on for centuries time. Was ended. Through VPN's and an occasional hidden banner. In just eight months.

>>165299
>Limestone
Patrician taste.
Limestone must get all tense and strained from working on a rock farm all day. I just want to give her a nice relaxing massage and knead the stress out of her muscles after a long day.

>>165301
My bad for posting Limestone instead.
>I just want to give her a nice relaxing massage and knead the stress out of her muscles after a long day.
Based. Limestone deserves to be pampered after all she does for her family. I want to give her a massage and brush her out in a sauna after a hard day of work.

>>165299
>foisted by petard
I have yet to make gay shoops, thats just (you)
>this is what he does when
Oh? You have examples? Go on then, post them; now is certainly the time, if ever

>>165304
>I have yet to make gay shoops, thats just (you)
<boasts about knowing Atlas
<ousts a Texan NEET working at a bank over a random post
<brings up a mod/admin that may be a lawyer as power play
Geez, we wouldn't to be too mean, would we?
>You have examples?
The search bar exists. Oldfags don't even need it. Again, you're back at it again with the coy bullshit. Nigel was never this bad.

>>165305
The nigger porn isn't funny. It's just gay.

>>165306
But anon, hes 'owning' me by showing his gay porn. Cant you see what an epic win it is?

>>165305
Yes, I knew Atlas. He has a pair of custom cutting boards I handmade.
Yes I referenced an anon (neet? Neets dont have jobs) who works at a bank, who likes to criticize people for working for jews.
And yes, there is a lawyer around here. Sue me for noticing.
And yet, theres all this gay porn from (you).
Fuck y'all

>>165306
I disagree. I thinks it's funny. That being said, niggers are just a coincidence and I'm just randomly getting porn that his head can be shopped into.
I encourage everyone to do the same.
>>165308
>he keeps omitting the context, thus missing the point to hide his true character
>Fuck y'all
You wish you could. I will NEVAR go back out to your brother's ranch and fuck you again. You didn't even pay me like you said you would.

I rest my case

Remember when I suggested the staff was compromised? When you simply wouldn't get the T-Revengers joke?
Well, you immediately said that was not the case. You took the time to explain, told me to take your own words with a grain of salt. You were visibly concerned about starting a crusade against staff under false premises. So much so you just abandoned your momentum to sort things out.

It speaks volumes about your honesty and commitment for the site, and for that, I'll always respect you.
Please anon, just reconsider what I posted earlier, my ID might have changed but it's still me.

This is the last one, going to bed now.

Golly, what happened to the last one? I hadnt finished fapping yet!

>>165313
Mods taking your side won't make you less of a faggot. Ban me.

>>165314
Not by my hand, Id have you keep illustrating what a faggot you are. Oh well.

>>165314
I got a report about gay porn spam. I haven't caught up on this thread to even take a side. Why are you derailing the discussion anyway?

>>165316
So, how much do you know about my post history? Don't play with fire. I forgave you then and shouldn't have.
>>165317
>Why are you derailing the discussion anyway?
Because he shits up other threads on the regular. He dishes it out, but can't take it. I don't see why he should be above the standards of anyone else. I don't see why someone shouldn't be able to come into his special play and call him a faggot. That being said, do what you gotta do. No hard feelings.

>>165318
>cant take it
Excuse me? Ive taken more than anyone on the site EVER during your liþle temper tantrum. Go on, posture more.
>>165317
Hes still mad cuz I said his post was off topic. See >>165227

>>165318
Yes, but they are most often tangentially related or mentioning staff and his dissatisfaction with them, which is not against the rules. Meanwhile, using sensitive information in images while claiming to be fighting back is not how to go about it in the slightest. Engage with the material in the thread and if you see him going off topic in another thread, refer him back to the topic of said thread.

>>165318
Huh, pretty sure he was talking about me here >>165316

>Because he shits up other threads on the regular. He dishes it out, but can't take it. I don't see why he should be above the standards of anyone else.
He's probably the most heavily scrutinised poster in the entire site.

>>165319
You apparently can't take it, given how your being protected.
It's east to argue against someone that could possibly get banned for any post. Again, me getting banned won't make you less of a faggot.

>>165318
>I forgave you and I shouldnt
So, were you full of shit then, and/or are you full of shit now?

>>165322
Im the LAST person staff will protect. Ngl, Im surprised (pleasantly) that staff isnt letting us sort this ourselves, so ur barking uo the wrong tree on that one.
If staff deciding "whoah, u gone too far" when u clearly have means "I cant take it", I cant imagine what 2+2= in ur mind.

>>165323
Oh, nevermind. >>165321

>>165325
Ur fine, I have no animus toward you

>>165322
You won't be banned. Just please stay on topic. You can always make a thread on /qa/ if you feel so inclined to make a detailed discussion and ask staff positions on the matter, but I don't think this is a fight worth having. I would much rather users work together to make a quality site despite how much we get on each other's nerves.

>>165324
I prefer things get settled without intervention, so it doesn't appear the staff is playing favorites with anyone, as it immediately appeared to be for this user. But this is clearly something that is not able to be resolved and put back on track without it.

>>165320
>sensitive information in images
It's based off of an image he posted of himself. I'm not even doxing him and his brother's gay wood company or anything. Just poking fun because it elicits a reaction. Ban me if you must.

>>165327
I can speak to this at length, but it really boils down to "I made him mad some time ago and he wanted to stick it to me".
His shoopsnwere pretty decent, nevermind the gay porn

>>165328
Dont be coy. I cropped the images, and you extracted the source image. Dont act like I just wantonly posted my face,

>>165326
Nah, I just got confused. Thought you meant this one >>>/sp/19231 →

It's on me tho.

>>165331
All good, but no, not thenapology I was talking about. Anon knows tho

>>165328
Please work on reading comprehension. There is no ban. And poking fun is simple and effective without sensitive information, no matter how public. This board values anonymity and privacy. This needs to be reflected in your own behavior so no one is tempted to become far too careless with personal information. It is true he posted the image himself. It is not yours to reupload carelessly.
And see below:

>>165329
Photoshop would be handy used for pony related art. Perhaps a thread on using this for the right reasons is the way to go?

>>165334
Eh, I doubt any progress would come of it. Anon is unsatisfied, so its presumable that he'll be waiting for "his moment" no matter what.
He isnt wrong though, I have taken liberties. Not for the reasons suggested, but the flippancy WAS there, so if Im being honest this IS largely on me (at least, his frustration is). I can acknowledge that.

>>165332
>>165335
It was a cool deer though. But to start to steer back on topic, this thread might see activity again when another thread gets made, hopefully on the soon-ish side of things.

>>165334
> This board values anonymity and privacy.
Yet he posts his own face. Somehow I'm the bad guy for using it when similar shit is above board for him.
>It is not yours to reupload carelessly.
My hard drive says otherwise. Once it's publicly online, it's there forever and part of the public domain.
That being said, I'm done. Fuck it. Protect your cow.

>>165337
It is his image. He can post it if he wants. That doesn't mean you get to throw it back in his face. We don't want that to happen to you should that ever come about, so afford him the same luxury. This way we protect all of our anons while using the site.

>protect your cow
I do hope you calm down and see that this is in the best interest of all users.

>>165336
Tbh, this thread wasnt intended to have much activity; more of me compiling media and resources to make a case with later, while also making the material available if anyone felt bored/compelled. Ill return to the subject matter in the morning.
Biggest gain: learning how much anon has it out for me ^_^

https://youtu.be/KHC4mSUMrBk
Genetically Modified Skeptic discussing with Dr. Bart Ehrman about how historical analysis and evidence of the time of the gospels is NOT intended to undermine either the church or the accepted story of Jesus, rather to BETTER understand the story and what may have actually happened that developed into the Bible of today.

>>164709
>1902: Key to predicting the future
>>165119
>2040 seems plausible, but 138 years seems... I cant refute it

Moar on that and I believe it clarifies the sources (records). Among the incredible and numerous peculiarities is the fact the most today's S&P 500 companies miraculously popped up in 1902. A really interesting chat.
>Max Igan in Conversation with Jason Breshears - Archaix - July 31st 2022
>This is a completely unedited, no frills, free flowing conversation.
https://odysee.com/@thecrowhouse:2/Max-Igan-in-conversation-Jason-Breshears:1
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/IfTXtTD1bOfN/

Got a request here. I didn't remembered this before, but here it is.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agrat_bat_Mahlat

Since there's substantial talk about le Kabbalah here; I would like to know if you have something to add or point out as false from that article.
Just a freenly request.

>>165428
I still have some cross referencing to do yet but as far as archetypes are concerned, I'm leaning toward the idea that the prescribed interpretation of jews is probably not right in some way and this is no exception. I did find the references and relevance to Lilith quite timely, given recent activity in the Bible study thread.

>>165431
Glad to see you've looked into it, thanks Anon.

>I did find the references and relevance to Lilith quite timely, given recent activity in the Bible study thread.
Yeah, am the same Anon posting Hu Tao (>picrel) in that bread. Sorry if I came off a bit too defensive btw. Am ill-suited to discuss the subject matter as it is, and just wanted to give my two cents on the meme, borrowing from my personal experience.
So, I'm just a curious Anon here, hoping to learn a thing or two.

>>165432
Okay. With regard to Agrat specifically.
She is specifically likened, associated, and attributable to sorcery and the wild woman archetype. To the call her a demon is appropriate, as she is directly asserted to have advanced knowledge of spirit (demon being derived from daemon).
Being that the jews have opted for a right-hand path interpretation of Khaballistic legend, its quite understandable that they would be less appreciative of an infominable spirit, which ironically is the Luciferian spirit.
This coincides with that she is said to be the daughter/granddaughter of Lilith, who is the progenitor of the wild/wise woman archetype.
The early story of Lilith is that when given a proper mate who would challenge man to be greater than he has been, man balked and faltered and failed to meet his potential. This is why Lilith rejected man's primacy, because man had rejected his own primacy, but rather than acknowledge it, opted to try to suppress the female instead (literally, the divine female) and the God of the old testament (Yyaldabaoth/Baldur, NOT a true creator god) who was tasked with trying to perpetuate humanity (think the ship computer from Wall-E) said "Ur right, fuck that bitch, heres a supplicant/subordinate woman.
Because Yyaldabaoth/Baldur wanted HUMANITY to be a supplicant/subordinate, because he COULDNT create he could only try to mold, so if he fucked up what was left of humanity he couldnt fix it.

>>165432
>>165428
It was very interesting to investigate. Ngl, there are observe parallels between Agrat and immediate family and phenomena Ive observed in creative ventures. It will certainly add to.mh repertoire,and I maintain that the jewish conclusion (excuse me, "orthodox" conclusion) is precisely backward for all the reasons one might assess a jewish position to be backward.

>>165446
Very interesting Anon, nice. If what you say is correct, I can see it does actually line up with what the femmes believe, at least to a certain point and even if coincidentally.
I kinda wonder what your thoughts are on Tanya the Evil. With your gnosticism and all that.

>>165448
Am glad you found it interesting, and I greatly appreciate your response. If you don't mind me asking, you aren't a regular Gnostic are you?

>>165472
>Tanya the Evil
One of my favorite anime protagonists. Obviously her history is a little contrived and all, but otherwise spectacular; a model for all sociopaths who dont want to be all about themselves.

>>165472
>regular gnostic
I dont consider myself a gnostic at all, though their material has been quite useful and informative at interval. I consider myself a Luficerian of proprietary pagan tradition centered/focused around (you're surprised?) Ninjas.

I'll take an opportunity to illustrate the great divide in religious/philosphical existence.
There is no such thing as a religion that doesnt involve rules, precepts, directions, etc. Ostensibly, these rules are geared toward creating a stronger person, a stronger family, a stronger community, and a stronger society. Without being specific of a particular religion, the religion is presented as the authority.
When a person submits to that authority, that is what is known as a right-hand path. When a person refuses to submit to the authority and operates in defiance, this is what is known as a left-hand path.
The terms are derived from India iirc, based on the rotation of the sun and which direction one turns when facing north. A person who takes the right hand path will spend their days in the sun and the night in darkness and slumber, constantly facing the rising sun. A person who takes the left hand path will spend half their days and half their nights under the sun and in darkness, as their contrary direction stacks with the sun's rotation, and will constantly be oriented toward the setting sun.
Less figuratively, the right hand path (Abrahamic traditions, not exclusovely) impress the idea of the infallibility and absolute authority of God, and the absolute necessity of submission to God. Left hand path traditions (Norse, being a particularly good example) are all about defying the dictates of God or Gods, insisting that the individual find their own satisfaction and purpose in life, refusing any imposition or control on their free will.

Lets take a look at Genesis. The right hand path sees that God was right to forbid eating from the tree of knowledge of good and evil, and that God was just for expelling Adam and Eve for their disobedience.
The left hand path feels that God was attempting to imprison humanity in the garden of Eden, offering perpetual life (the fruit of life) in exchange for never achieving the knowledge and understanding that humanity was intended to have from ther creation. As such, the first act of defiance against this God was the first step toward humanity's emergence and sovereignty. The idea here being, humanity was intended for more than the 'protector' God would allow, and THEY were just in their defiance.
The difference in the two schools of thought - beyond having vastly different interpretations of who is who and what is what - is one of individual agency. Lhp feels the individual is right and entitled to determine their own pursuits, devotions, etc. by their own agency, in order to get closer to what is viewed as the true God. Rhp feels that unchecked human agency causes increased separation from God, leading to the ruination of man.
Rhp further asserts that morality COMES from God, and that to defy is immoral, whereas Lhp tends to assert Natural Law as a moral framework, and that the pursuit of God in defiance of dictates is how one correctly approaches God.

>>165474
>>165473
>you're surprised?
Certainly not. Sociopath & Proud
>>165476
>RHP n' LHP
I don't feel like using your bread for something that's basically just concerning myself. But I would appreciate if you were to follow me.
>>>/ub/5854 →

Bumping with some very good questions about Tartaria.