/vx/ - Videogames and Paranormal

>>148160
Insulting my honour for not getting baited into pointless fights makes no sense. You're trying to start an unnecessary fight with everyone who understands why the unnecessary fights you're offering are pointless.

>>148162
There is no objective legitimacy in internet arguments. Just assholes who don't know when to shut up.

>>148164
This TBQH

>>148163
>Insulting my honour
It's an internet argument. Your honor is going to be insulted either way.

>>148162
>When you say 'honor', are you referring to when you started accusing me of your paranoid delusions because I trashed your idea?
Hell no, I'm referring to when you barged into the thread to say against my character among other things, and I quote, "get fucked."

>Look, if you wanna make some sort of /mlpol/ fighting/gaming league, knock yourself out. Then, if you want to challenge assholes to a match, have at it. But dont expect whatever you do to have any legitimacy outside of any personally and individually agreed (read: a gentleman's contract) scope or contest. Competition is fine, and I admit such a situation could help individuals to settle their differences, but that is not something that should have any weight in an argument, and the idea that it 'should' ought to raise alarm bells.
Yeah that's a fair assessment to espouse. Just don't tell me to get fucked or generally act disrespectful towards me or we're going to have a problem. Everyone's got a line pal, and I've been gracious enough thus far to look past both the times you've crossed mine.

>>148164
Do you think this will go in circles forever?
>"come on guys, playing chess with commies will totally prove we're smarter than them and if we beat them they'll totally honour any agreements they made! if they don't we can laugh at them for being dishonourable- what do you mean we already knew this?"

>>148168
Does it have to be with commies?

>>148167
Get
Fucked

>>148171
Bruh

...
Fucking hell. There was a time when the cesspool site cough 4cuck cough was considered a hurtbox. Usually shanked with truth, and at times empty words.
I mean way wayyyy more brutal. Just ripping people to shreds and the only thing keeping it from going overboard was anonymity and the quantity of posts speeding by.
So to be frank that's not going to work here. Even if there was a bloodbath thread/board jimmies are going to be rustled. This doesn't give something that bonds people together with, heck the only thing that the hurtbox gave to bond over with was painful truth.
That's why blood feuds were a thing as people kept going back and forth getting revenge for sullying the family honor.
Destroying good people and their lineage.

Okay, but the inverse is also true. Not going into full retaliation to the strike is where we are at now. As in many traditions and people have been chipped away and washed out by fuckers. It brings about the snobbery and backstabbing.

So fine the two far ends have their problems, but surely something can be done about people calling each other faggots or fuckwads right?
Well technically yes, use more creative insults. But to be fair the real issue is that spillover into other threads is the issue along with it being seemingly unending.
The solution is just as simple rule 1 rule 2 thread. You have shit to unload do it there. What happens in rule 1 rule 2 threads says in rule 1 rule 2 thread.

Okay, but some threads have a... visitor of the monetary sort with an agenda, or someone from a hugbox who stumbled here as stated hoers pussy and truth works together 99.99% of the time.
Okay but that didn't really solve the issue because it's about ego and the feelings. On the other hand seeing the same dude say the same things can be aggrovating.
But honestly being able to say fuck off to what is essentially psychological w... fisty cuffs of big scale is a handy skill to refine, and then turn that barb around.

>>148173
Thank you
>>148172
You, get fucked 2x. What are we, guidance counselors worrying about offending sensibilities? We gotta worry about feelings and impressions and shit? Jesus christ, anon used to have some balls. I'm not besmirching frenship, but some frens use tough love; it's a thing, quit being a faggot.

>>148173
>Pic 4
"I Have Heard of People converting from a lie to the truth,But not once have i heard of someone converting from the truth to a lie." - Commander George Lincoln Rockwell(R.I.P)

>>148175
It's not about offending sensibilities. You just suck at arguing if you think telling people to get fucked will somehow convince them.
So, without further ado, get fucked.

Okay so that's part A the /pol/
>>148173
This is now part B the /mlp/
The friendship part
>>147208
>>148038
So hear me out, cooperative games/activities.
Instead of shank of truth where is smarts quite a bit, it's the velvety glove of truth to softly strangle the best a person can be by their own will. Basically advanced trickery, but everyone is having a great time aka leadership and follower dynamics (they alternate an dhappen at the same time to lead both parties to better places).
There are six principles that govern it and I'll just reiterate them.
Laughter
Kindness
Generosity
Honesty
Loyalty
Friendship (magic which in part also means actively pursuing friendship)

So the reasoning stands that a spectator game (or one with even more players) could work to enhance bonds and sooth ego (usually by way of working well as a team does accomplish more, even if in different ways).
This six part system is also a quantifiable metric (to an extent).
With that said instead of a means to ridicule and demean, it ought to be used to build up and improve while also providing good sunshine examples.
All of the above have to be done in good faith, even if it's grumbling good faith. That means if someone gets suckered punched it's going to hurt more, and that's counterproductive.
A common goal that is to be entertaining, completing the objective, and strengthening friendship.

>>148177
Gladly, though you'll pardon any seeming indecisiveness as I work the details out. In the meantime, you've yet admit address my salient point. Unless you wanna internet duel, that's where your attention should be focused.

>>148178
THAT is an incontestable(imo) position. Please, do go on

>>148173
>>148178
Okay so both parts are not actually mutually exclusive. They work extremely well together. In every aspect.
So what just keep blasting each other with truth designed to maximize harm and somehow friendship? Well.. I mean... it could work...
Nah, tactics, efficiency, effectiveness, and redundancy points that bring stuck in a corner with someone is a pretty neat place to find friends. Even by happenstance.
So the Friendship part has to be taken into account for all matters.
Even in truth speedy poking matches with gibblets spewing everywhere.

So why bring this up?
Common goals. Commies tend to put their asinine whatever crap as their one and onky thing they offer. They don't really have true true friends. They themselves don't exhibit friendship.
So we're not Globalist (((fuckwads))) yay us.
We're also quite different at times as well with disagreements and such.
Sometimes amazing things can only happen when certain people come into contact through different times and circumstances to have be done.
Being in a shitstorm flinging match and mutual jokes is a good time. So is watching people do something amazing!
Even when the activity is seemingly meaningless on the grand scale small acts bring us all closer to friendship and truth.
Because those small acts are what actually destroy evil from creeping in, and brings about good into the world and ourselves.
While learning /mlpol/ lessons along the way.
<The fuck are you saying zigger.
Punch people with friendship in heart and in hand only playing by truth, while also getting punched by friendship.

More exactly 1v1 and multiple people are both valid, just gotta be painfully true at all times with friendship.
<inb4 NiggerFaggotCocksuckerSpeedInsultChess with friends.

So when I call someone a fucktarded assblasted halfcocked nohooves lover. That's not actually completely true, just uhhh expressing the feelings inside in a neither constructive nor destructive manner, but the intent afterward and deep down under the rage and disbelief is friendship and truth... somewhere
That didn't mean the words are all that effective, but it does mean they could do with a tune up for maximum penetration.
Cause those words arn't that great.

So instead I'll say
>foight yah mate?
<yah cheeky breeky
>chess mate?
<nah mate, how about a round of the ol tounge slappy?
>noice yeah slick cunt. Inna remaned pic yeh?
<painted pic too yeh?
>Yeah!
<Yeah!
>Technically Mission Failed Successfully.
With the purpose being to disarm grudges as a side effect. Any means can take place as long as all parts are exhibited fully like a starker streaker throwing pork in halal factories.

>>148179
I don't have a strong opinion either way. I just think it's interesting.

>>148183
Ngl, this is spot on. If a dude cant take a good ribbing, then hes not worth shit. But if he can, I might toast him.

OP could learn a thing about it.

>>148183
Hooves are Good But so are >No Hooves

>>148171
Okay. If that's the route you want to go.
.
.
Regarding the Formal Challenge of a Duel

From the get-go I've known you as an insufferable piece of shit with a projected and well-earned inferiority complex befitting only a transsexual or a communist. You have no honor, and I can count on you only to take the lowest and most cowardly route possible in any discussion that has the displeasure of accommodating your conniving and spiteful presence, as you obviously have no nuts and all you can do is bark without bite, wastrel cur that you are.
You also can't help but take your anger at being rightfully kicked off of the moderation team out on unsuspecting anons and disturbing the peace, without putting forth any helpful arguments of your own, and expressly trying to drag everyone else with your shitty attitude; I encourage all anons to see >>>/qa/5921 → in case they want to have a laugh at this very anon bitching and moaning, and as I quote, getting "bitch slapped" by the moderation staff over the ban regarding his infantile behavior in this very thread, and has been given every chance up until this point to take it back, far more many times than the likes of him deserve.
Thus, I hereby formally challenge you to pull the rainbowed dildo out of your otherwise gaping asshole and to an internet duel, date and game to be determined. At this point I think three months without your presence on this website would be bliss, and since fair's fair and I consider myself a generous man, should I lose I won't count the time I've already spent off in self-imposed exile.

So what will it be? Will you stand and fight like a man, or shall you cower like a dog?

>>148200
Now who's derailing?
The issue attempted to be addressed in that thread was that moderation has abandoned the rules (until the recent amendment, which is its self a blanket pass to violate the rules, but at least its there) and was making shit up. That's been resolved, ish.
To your other point, let's be clear. I am not a nice person. If you want nice, why are you on the internet? My candor rustles your jimmies? You think I'm insufferable? Great. So do the mods btw, which in spite of their posturing, I was the black sheep because I told people to get off their ass and amend the policy page (not exclusively, theres other shit that they are wilfully derelict at, but my main gripe is resolved so we'll leave those). Your welcome, it only took a year and some of the most extreme badgering I've ever engaged in. And notice how readily it was amended even in spite of assurances that 'its hard' and 'getting people to agree' and whatever other excuses I've forgotten. Horseshit.
But I digress.
Are you really so thin skinned that you get triggered when someone tells you to get fucked? Are you expecting accommodation from some guy on the internet?
Let's check the record. You accused me of doxing, derailing, et al because I was mean in my refutation of your premise.
Oh,but I'm the one with no honor. Pull the other one.
Well let me address your challenge.
Get fucked
>will you stand and fight or will you cower like a dog
I have a business to run, I dont have time to indulge your wounded pride in some vidya, sorry son. You have no standing, no means by which to compel my concession, and Idgaf if you stay or go. Ergo, seethe harder, and have fun playing with dolls That IS what vidya is at its core, its playing with dolls

Why does this site have to be full of manbabies who take trivial conversations personally and fling shit at each other instead of trying to have an actual discussion? It's all so tiresome.

>>148200
If he backed down, apologized tearfully, and took back every complaint he ever had about the inconsistent application of staff policies just because you called him a faggot for not loving your internet duels idea, how would that make him more masculine? If he was temp banned or permabanned, that wouldn't make his complaints about policy illegitimate. Only marxists think the use of unaccountable force makes you "right". Internet duels are a worthless idea as most adults have more to do than practice one game for hours every day. But if staff policies are improved, everyone wins.

>>148204
>Why does this site have to be full of manbabies who take trivial conversations personally and fling shit at each other instead of trying to have an actual discussion? It's all so tiresome.

The discussion was had, and the reasons pointed out. For and against and what honor or 'honor' is. At the core the difference is the freedom of speech vs honor/feelings. As was discussed only fellow poners who have a modicum of mutual respect would fully engage. Since there would be mutual respect for this to happen the duel is largely for show and entertainment.
<issue a challenge to give way to the feelings, and then also pull up past history irrelevant to the current challenge as bait
<nah here's what I did get thicker skin fuck off
Now I could needle people on finer details. So I'm not.

In any case a prime example on how the fuck not to issue an internet challenge.
>Step the first address salient points
<Step the second verbal throwdown
>OP chose the least optimal way of baiting some who's properties are different
<Precise words have to be used at every instance unless trying to discover what those correct words or meanings are.

>>148203
I'd just recommend more detached and neutral words upfront. Then in the second follow up post unload. But that's still not the optimal recommendation.

>>148207
Perhaps not optimal, but I appreciate your suggestion and find some merit to it

Okay, folks. Message received. The duels idea is not a good one; it's off the table. And you can go ahead and shoot the messenger all you like, it's not like anything's gonna stop you anyway. But in a year or three when this place could very well be a ghost town, I hope you can say I really did try. Best of luck, folks. Even you >>148203, buddy. Godspeed.

>>148243
Why would this place spontaneously become a ghost town just because the duel idea is more retarded than anything anyone else has ever said on this site? Yes, users here have a habit of jumping down the throat of anyone who makes a thread they don't like. But this thread is silly.
Being a man doesn't mean leaping with fists raised every time someone tells you to jump. It's about fighting to protect what you believe in, not getting baited into distractions for the sake of ego. Maybe if this was one forum focused on one game it would make sense to resolve personal disputes through that gaming medium everyone present cares about. But this isn't supposed to be a site for petty personal disputes, this is a site for serious political discussion except fun is allowed. Then again gaming is kind of degenerate. Do you really improve skills when you game or just grind away for hours hoping for dopamine and "prestige"?

>>148243
Ffs did you read the thread? Nothing is perfect from the inception.
It's not bad, but there is deadly flaws that have to be addressed.

>But in a year or three when this place could very well be a ghost town, I hope you can say I really did try.
Explain your point well because I've seen jack for this line of reasoning supporting the duel idea out of the box.
>Best of luck, folks. Even you >>148203, buddy. Godspeed.
Thanks, are you sticking around preventing the doom foretold?

Anywho a year or three is when shit hits the fan so having multiple lines of potential communication at all times is important.
Especially to destress. And speak freely without being mysteriously shot twenty times by suicide in self defense.
>>148247
<hoers pussy

>Then again gaming is kind of degenerate.
...
>Do you really improve skills when you game
Yes. If you play in degenerate ways you get degenerate prizes.
What you put in and what the creator(s) puts in plus what you try to bring out is what you get. It's like anything.
If you want something wholesome you gotta extract it. It's where agency and applied skill works in a relatively short time span to see your fruits in motion.

>video related
Something something actual moral of the story.
Also pones love tendies.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xN9Bvr6D2cQ

Hey wait a minute, I think that means I actually won by default.

Trumpet Sounds

Let it be known that whenever the hell this dumb shit took place, Ninjas the tranny got utterly assraped in full display of everyone and liked it like a good little slut. Quite literally didn't even have the balls to put up a fight like a man, because "she" knew she would be utterly decimated. You know you could've just chosen a champion, right? Ah, whatever.

>>153104
I won by default. Suck it.
>>148201
See this, nobody took it up. Winner by default.
Nobody else fucking 'won' in anything. I'm sure this is the medical woowoo coursing through talking, but look at this pic.

>>153104
thats some serious reaching there

>>153104
If by 'win by default' you actually being 'choke like a bitch an neglect to address any of the arguments presented', then yourr right.
start with these (in reverse order, cuz were both lazy)
>>148248
>>148247
>>148207
>>148203

>>153107
mean* (-being)

>>153104
>>153105
Neither of you niggers "won". You're both retards who convinced nobody but yourselves.

If internet duels were a thing, what kind of games would be best for them?

>>158610
FPS Games.

>>158613
Why do you say?

>>158613
Yeah that makes sense. Why a Fighting Game that rewards skillful use of unique tools, spacing, quick thinking, and matchup knowledge when you could instead choose a COD clone any dorito dust-snorting faggot can play and win?

>>158639
Yeah, I guess agame with low skill entry would be better.

>>158640
>fighting games
>low skill entry
this really is a bait thread

You know what? I'm tired of this.

There are no valid arguments for pretending the outcome of a political debate can be settled by who is better at Chess. Or Team Fortress 2. Or Pokemon. Or Naruto Ultimate Ninja Storm 4. Only a pseudointellectual subhuman would even suggest this. It does not matter what game is suggested unless that game provides an opportunity for the big strong right-winger to beat an effeminate leftist to death. Shockingly, competitive Halo does not provide this, so it is worthless in settling our differences.

I legitimately do not respect you or anyone else who would pretend it's on me to disprove something to your standard when it is factually and logically false. Spend more than a second questioning the premise of this thread instead of hurling childish insults around, your behaviour demeans us both.

Duelling is only worth something when there is a risk of physical injury or death, because this is earned by lying and insulting a good man's honour. Libtards deserve worse than what any good man could ever do to them in a duel. They certainly deserve worse than being beaten in a vidyagaem. Beating them in Poker will not hurt their feelings or slow down their creeping dominance of the world. None of our enemies would ever honour any wagers. Beating one Muslim in Yugioh won't convince them all to fuck off back to the Nigger East even if we promised we would all move to Venezuela if we lost. You would know this by now if you could. If you could understand why I am right you would have figured this out for yourself. The argument is self-defeating. An "internet duel" serves no useful purpose. I don't know why anyone would blindfold themselves and repeatedly insist "duelling good, only cowardly faggots disagree, hurr durr I don't hear any arguments against this" and expect a 5k word argument against it. Does the clown responsible for this thread hope to bait people into getting mad over the behaviour displayed by faggots who don't understand the truth? Is that the true purpose of this thread: Seeing who can remain calm in the face of blatant bad-faith trolling?

Our enemies rape children for fuck's sake.

Our enemies rape children and kill children and mutilate the genitals of children. Our enemies are pure evil and anyone with the capacity to understand what's right and what'd wrong knows this. Peace means accepting white genocide and it's only "accelerationism" if we resist. Do you really think getting an opportunity to call our enemies "cowards afraid of duelling in yugioh" or "liars who won't honour wagers over COD" is worth the risk that someone representing us and our ideals might lose? Think, nigger, think.

People out there practice vidyagames competively for hours every day. They take the game more seriously than life itself. For people like me with an actual life and healthy hobbies, that's not an option. For people with a real job, that's certainly not an option. Our enemies have funding. Our enemies are organized. Our enemies could pay any professional gamer without shame to represent them. How many streamers would jump at the chance to "punch a nazi in minecraft" only actually in Minecraft this time, and have their cock sucked by news sites for it?

Man is man. Woman is woman. If some tranny crushed you in Team Fortress 2 would that suddenly make trannies valid? Of course it fucking wouldn't, fuck anyone who would try even suggesting such a thing.

You're free to embarass yourself getting your shit stomped in Street Fighter by Daigo Umehara as he drags his sweaty Shoto balls across your face if you so please, but don't pretend even for a second that this will settle any argument other than "Who is the better Street Fighter player".

If you're going to say "You haven't made an argument", don't embarass yourself. If you're going to say "You are afraid of duelling me over the validity of duelling", don't. If your reply contains "You're just a", shush. No deflection, no dismissal, no smug desperate copium-huffing, no disgracing yourself with further insults against logic. Your bait is weak. The very premise of this thread is homosexual. My argument is obvious: We have nothing to gain from pretending even for a second that the outcome of a football match will decide what race deserves to be genocided and what race doesn't. Physically punishing leftists for assaulting our peaceful protests puts the fear of God into them, especially if the police cannot make an example of those responsible. But "pwning some n00bs in COD" will never show them the error of their ways. Vidyagame duelling is a bad idea. Think, faggot. Think.

>>158644
Maybe it wasn't such a good idea to bump this thread...

>>158644
Checked

>>158644
>who would pretend it's on me to disprove something
Are you the same retard who blows a gasket whenever people ask for a source to back up your claims?

>>158614
the "1V1" or one versus one has been a staple of fps games for decades, it is essentially a test of skill to see who is better. IE a Duel.