/vx/ - Videogames and Paranormal


New Teatime planned. Join us for Teatime with Staff this Saturday! Time and place to be announced.
* Time and place is subject to change depending on feasibility.

If you want to see the latest posts from all boards in a convenient way please check out /overboard/

Name
Email
Subject
By clicking New Reply, I acknowledge the existence of the Israeli nuclear arsenal.
Comment
0
Select File / Oekaki
File(s)
Password (For file and/or post deletion.)

1621477593.jpg
Internet Duels
Anonymous
5c7c0d9
?
No.146950
146954 147185 147208 147274 147275
Has anyponer ever thought of using a video game to settle an internet argument, like a 1v1 game, fighting or FPS, as a duel of sorts? Is this already a thing? Can we make this happen concurrently with mlpol.net, or would there be too many complications with OPSEC? Posting here, let me know if it should move to /qa/.

Have at you!
Anonymous
032862e
?
No.146953
1621544738.jpg
This being mlpol.net, it would only make sense to have the game be Them's Fightin' Herds, come to think of it. Too bad I suck at fighting games, maybe this could be my shot at getting better.

Think about it, if some faggot is still hiding behind their keyboard after getting called out all you really have to say is "Tits or GTFO." Entertainment for everyone, gallantry of anons' honor on full display, what's not to like.

En garde!
Anonymous
e02e585
?
No.146954
146970
>>146950
It's not the same as a duel, tbh.
In the era if dueling, every ban was expected to have some degree of martial prowness, or at least be able to fire a gun; the ones who weren't seldom got into duels.
With video games, experience can play a big factor, and the playing field is hardly ever even unless both players are familiar with the game. There's little honor in defeating someone at a game they've never played.
Anonymous
1d4921f
?
No.146970
146971 146972
1621624773.png
>>146954
That's certainly a fair criticism. I figure that settling on one game could serve to mitigate it to a degree, if everyponer happened to be on board with it. As I've mentioned I myself have never played TFH, nor have I even ever been good at fighting games in general, and would likely get über-pwned at this point if I tried to start something, but I suppose it would be a sacrifice I would be willing to make for the perceived betterment of the community; that being that I had to learn a new game that I wasn't already very good at, and be extra careful about my words until I did so.

The problem, I suppose, that I'm attempting to zero in on and help neutralize is that words tend to be barbed where straight up traded blows aren't, as in it really doesn't matter how many times someone gets ruthlessly BTFO, they'll likely still come back and claim they've been right all along, whereas in a game there's a clear winner, no question, doesn't matter what someone's perspective is on the issue at hand. The defense that's been used so far to oust people that are clearly outsiders up until this point is horsepron, which indeed has proven effective, but not against people that are already horsefuckers, and we still can get into heated disagreements sometimes that seem to drag on long past the time it would take to get rekt in a video game for the whole of the board to see.

Another way around this weakness in the proposed system is that people on imageboards likely know their ways around vidya already, maybe the challengers could agree on a game instead.
Anonymous
aec79ca
?
No.146971
>>146970
Rivals Of Aether is a better choice, anyone can make characters for that game and get them working in a high-speed technical platform fighter that's better than Smash Bros.
Anonymous
7fb307a
?
No.146972
146973 146974 146975 147183
>>146970
Asinine. Be careful with your words, unless you're willing to duke it out in vidya? That a game should have more merit than the presented ideas? That detractors who are immune to horsepussy can otherwise be goaded into a 'duel' to 'fix' something (profit?)? Get fucked
Anonymous
1d4921f
?
No.146973
>>146972
Watch your words, son. Wouldn't want to see you get assblasted in front of all your poner friends.
Anonymous
1d4921f
?
No.146974
1621627394.jpg
>>146972
He's just saying that because he knows we'll make him our woman.
Anonymous
1d4921f
?
No.146975
>>146972
Again with the anger, pal. It's a wonder you don't routinely get your ass beat IRL. Or do you?
Anonymous
7fb307a
?
No.146976
146977 146979
3 (yous)? It must be my birthday
Anonymous
1d4921f
?
No.146977
>>146976
Not till you get spanked in vidya.
Anonymous
9993885
?
No.146978
146979
The only game that would work for this sort of thing is Besti. Anyone who might ask how a winner would be determined would be instantly banned, because they obviously don't belong here.
Anonymous
1d4921f
?
No.146979
146980
1621632431.png
>>146976
That's what I thought. Come back if you ever decide to grow a pair, pussy.

>>146978
I had never heard of that before myself, but the description on searx shows that it's a sexual VR game made by a furry and so is not my style.
Anonymous
7fb307a
?
No.146980
146981
>>146979
Look here bitchfist, if you cant win an argument you dont deserve to 'win' based on arbitrary video game 'skills', especially when video games are degenerate in the first place
>Skill at chess is a sign of refinement, but mastery of chess is the sign of a wasted life -Unknown
Forgive me if I am unwilling to cede victory in an argument to someone who can only win at a contest of button mashing.
Anonymous
1d4921f
?
No.146981
146982
1621634411.png
>>146980
Lol. Get wrecked faggot.
Anonymous
7fb307a
?
No.146982
146983
>>146981
Case in point. Mr. Uber samefag thinks hes winning an argument by refusing to argue. This is precisely why it should never boil down to a glorified thumb-wrestling match, because that places thumb skills above reason. Get fucked 2x
Anonymous
1d4921f
?
No.146983
146984
>>146982
Time for some damage control, huh. Never got called out before? To put your money where your mouth is? You just pussied out like a fucking bitch dude.
Anonymous
7fb307a
?
No.146984
146985
>>146983
>u wont play a game instead of debate = you're a bitch
Please continue with your enlightened commentary
Anonymous
1d4921f
?
No.146985
146986
1621636814.gif
>>146984
How's this for commentary. You know where to find me if you want to beg for daddy's cock again, faggot.
Anonymous
7fb307a
?
No.146986
146987 146988
>>146985
Hold your breath, I'll get right on it
Anonymous
1d4921f
?
No.146987
>>146986
>Hold your breath
I'd rather not.

>I'll get right on it
Okay then.
Anonymous
1d4921f
?
No.146988
146989
>>146986
It's sounding like you might be willing to try to dig around and doxx someone over a bit of smack talk, would someone be right in the case that they should make that kind of assumption? You're gonna do whatever you're gonna do, but you really need help, buddy.
Anonymous
7fb307a
?
No.146989
146990
>>146988
I'd love to see you validate any of those assertions, with the little I've said. Seems an awful lot like projecting, except I cant fathom where either of us are operating as you claim. Are you sure about who needs help?
Anonymous
1d4921f
?
No.146990
146991
>>146989
Sounded rather threatening, pal. I can't really tell how far you'd be willing to go sometimes tbh; as in with what little interaction we've had I sometimes can't tell if you've got the anger to kill a guy. You come out fucking swinging, mate. Sure would be appreciative if we could tone it down a bit in the future, with or without a fight to show who's boss.
Anonymous
7fb307a
?
No.146991
146992
>>146990
Again, I'd love to see you validate those assertions. Point to the spot on the doll where I touched you.
Anonymous
1d4921f
?
No.146992
146993
>>146991
Just a hunch, pal. Have a good one, I guess. Hope things get better for you.
Anonymous
7fb307a
?
No.146993
146994 147265
>>146992
Apology accepted
User was Banned for Thread Derailment and Attacking Users
Anonymous
1d4921f
?
No.146994
146995
>>146993
What? You know what, okay. Might be time to get off of this here website. Damn.
Anonymous
24d31a0
?
No.146995
146996
42967640-69FE-4AF1-A095-D311974BB717.png
>>146994
Don’t be silly. There are plenty of friendly ponies here who want to hear what you have to say
Anonymous
1d4921f
?
No.146996
147187
>>146995
Thanks brother, but if the above behavior is the kind that's deemed okay on this website I don't think I should be anywhere close to it, real world consequences or no. Anyway, I think I'm just gonna go take a break for now. Peace be with you poners.
Anonymous
0f284ff
?
No.147183
>>146972
It's no more asinine than an actual duel, tbh. Shooting someone doesn't prove an argument.
I don't think duels are really meant to resolve arguments in the first place though, just prove "honor".
Anonymous
0f284ff
?
No.147185
>>146950
>OPSEC
Wtf is this "OPSEC" meme I keep seeing? Since when is /mlpol/ a hive for glowniggers?
Anonymous
aec79ca
?
No.147187
>>146996
Could be worse, he could shriek "NIGEL!!!" every time someone with a british flag says something he doesn't like just because it's usually (but not always) me.
Music
Anonymous
7a80f5f
?
No.147208
SoPoners.png
I_ll Fly (stopswinter)
Glass Of Water
DISCORDORU
Jazz_Discord_Tombstonen
>>146950
So this idea is directly stolen from an anon on a comment related to Spike's reasoning to everyone else, how as a king all/many issues should be in song.
Using song, music, and singing (15.ai poner voices maybe) to demonstrate your points and counter points. So that the main ideas are present and why and how.
Afterwords...
Perhaps an anonymous co-authored (depending on how many sides of an issue is at play) song(s) to open new opportunities?

So that the lyrics (possible metronome and other factors maybe visual direction as well) and points to be considered is at the pinnacle of what they could be.
Breathing life into a song that has technical and logical application value as well. Memes that transcends the so called triad of meme etymology.

In pones it's a group effort at times. This is to attempt to create the best of ideas. So a bitter moment is always accompanied with superior works.
Anonymous
295f54d
?
No.147265
147268
>>146993
Thank you mods.
Anonymous
7fb307a
?
No.147268
147269 147271
>>147265
Cry moar
Anonymous
295f54d
?
No.147269
147270
>>147268
Not crying, buddy, at least not right now, though I suppose you couldn't say the same about the abject display of yours over on /qa/.

I'm going to try and level with you here anon. I left because your tone was rather ambiguous about whether or not you intended to try to doxx me, which is something I take very seriously, and is something that I believe an upstanding and honorable anon, given this type of situation, would immediately and unequivocally deny upon being asked about it, with no doubt left in the other anon's mind that that nothing of that sort would come of the situation; and that you didn't, to me, speaks volumes about your present character and to a desperate state of mind.
So let me be perfectly clear about what would happen if you were to get up to doing something like that, and I caught wind of it, the consequences of which behavior being listed as follows: your actions would be brought to light and you would be found out, if not that night, or the next week, or month, or year, or decade, and you would be made to pay for whatever damages might be accrued relative to what I had suffered thusly. Just so we're clear on that subject.

As for the other kinds of abusive rhetoric that you seem to think is okay of spewing whenever you feel like it due and leading to the disgrace that you've suffered, I don't enjoy lowering myself to namecalling in an attempt to resolve petty disputes online or anywhere really, which is why you've been let off easy on that one. Please note that you're contributing nothing to the well-being of the community or exchange of ideas by doing so, and are pretty much only making an ass of yourself that nobody wants to be around, but I suppose you already knew that. Still hope you get help, but that's really more for your own sake.
Anonymous
7fb307a
?
No.147270
147272
>>147269
>I dont like a thing, and you said mean words, so I think you might do a thing, and you didnt DENY you might do a thing. Why didnt you deny it? Dont you know that I think you should deny it? Well anyway you BETTER NOT or I'll find out! And I'll be mad!
Uhm, arent you supposed to be promoting vidya duels? I see you figured out how to put all your responses in one reply (so far) so kudos to you. But seriously, maybe you didnt notice, but you're the one coming up with all sorts of paranoid delusions because someone on the internet refuted your pwecious ideah.
It's pretty obvious who needs help.
Anonymous
e02e585
?
No.147271
>>147268
Don't be a nigger.
Anonymous
26ee197
?
No.147272
>>147270
Not gonna play these games with you buddy, I'm going to consider this conversation over for now. Have a good one.
Anonymous
ed62409
?
No.147274
147276
>>146950
Settling debates with videogame duels has to be the most retarded thing I've heard this year, and here's why.

Duels with swords give people a chance to get their anger out of their system, display their strength/speed/skill to onlookers, and punish those who have done them wrong. Duels with pistols give people a chance to gun down foes that might otherwise be backed up by gangs and families eager to get into blood fueds with your family/home, while ensuring the swiftest gunman in the west reigns supreme. It lets men back their words with violence and protect their reputation with violence, it lets men intimidate others into not risking duels over anything not legitimately important enough to risk your life over. Duels can end in bloodshed or simply end after a victor spares the loser. Without duels, someone can slander you endlessly with no means of counterattack beyond responding in kind, engaging in a costly legal battle (that might not even be possible if you don't share a country/legal system), hiring a private investigator to find something you can use to destroy your attacker's credibility in the eyes of the mob the attacker is sending after you, none of these options let you beat the shit out of your slanderer or kill her.

If some libtard cuck insisted whites shouldn't exist and backstabbed you in Team Fortress 2 to "prove it", would that genuinely make his jewish argument valid? If some muslim insisted his demonic Baphomet (aka Mohammed)-worshipping people are victims and Christians are oppressors and then facerolled your ass in Street Fighter V using unfair unreactable 50-50 mixups would that make his idiocy remotely tolerable by any civilized society that's worth being called rational? If some small-time gaming league was paid by leftists to "beat bullies" and kill+teabag gamers unafraid to talk about the dancing israelis, would that actually matter to the validity of any argument?

Surely you can't actually believe that. Surely, you jest.

In a rational society that prioritizes facts and logic over physical force, duels are an outdated notion with few benefits and plenty of downsides, such as the ways they can be used to bypass the legal system and let the deadliest criminals escape justice. Duels work best in societies with limited or no police, an era of Murder Warrants and "Wanted: Dead Or Alive" posters. An era where the able-bodied common man is encouraged to use force for the good of his community and the protection of its people. Not an era where this is best left to highly-trained professionals, or a corrupt era where the use of force is exclusively a privilege only the rich and their enforcers can enjoy without dire legal consequences from the revenge-obsessed jewish """justice""" industry.

There is no risk of death involved in gaming. There is no risk of humiliation in the eyes of the mainstream public as most people don't really give a shit about the finer points of hardcore gaming or what separates a clever trick from a cheap trick. A hard-working man with a job can get muscles from physical labour, muscles that would be useless trying to beat some cheap bullshit in TF2 from some NEET with nothing stopping him from dedicating almost all waking hours alive to the game, but excellent when used to beat the stupid out of some antifa NPC shouting "fashist" until he's blue in the face.

A white man who takes care of his physical and mental health and prepares for """a potential zombie apocalypse""" has important things to do. Things more important than gaming for hours every single day. Things more important than getting dragged into some esports bullshit over arguments that can stand on their own merits.

We are right, in case you haven't noticed. White people are right to say they should have a place to live. White people are right to say their civilization should be protected from jewish corruption. White people are right to say they should create a place for their children and secure their future. We don't need to get into silly gaming feuds that could make a few gooming-obsessed retards respect us more or backfire and make them think we're a bunch of faggots. We're fucking white. We are truth. We are reason. We don't need this bullshit. Our arguments work because they make more sense than weaponised leftist confusion. Our information spreads despite the best efforts of the (((globalists))) because it is truthful.

I shouldn't need to beat some twat in a game of Pokemon before he'll give logic a chance and admit the smokestacks at Aushwitz aren't even connected to the main building or its so-called "gas chambers" with wooden doors.

Please don't claim that I'm being overly harsh or hostile to your idiotic idea. I've tried to cut out personal insults towards you where possible, and you might notice that I've never once insinuated that you're a jewish fedboy here to start retarded arguments and play the needlessly-attacked oppressed victim in need of rescue when rightfully criticized. You genuinely need to think of better ones if you want to help white people. Get your head out of your ass and try harder.
Anonymous
ed62409
?
No.147275
147288 147289
>>146950
One more thing...

Nobody has to dox (or "doxx") you to prove that you are a faggot. Your words and deeds (and incredibly abnormal level of moderator protection) prove this beyond a shadow of a doubt.
Anonymous
e02e585
?
No.147276
>>147274
Duels aren't really about being right or proving an argument. They're moreso about "honor", or whatever.
If it's a way for two gamers to settle a dispute for an argument that they already know they'll never agree on, it might not be that bad.
It would require both parties to be confident in their proficiency at the game, and would mean that they'd need to already be part of the same gaming community. If such an event can even be organized, the two parties must see eye to eye enough to be able to call it quits in the name of sportsmanship.
Anonymous
ab521fa
?
No.147288
147289
>>147275
>and incredibly abnormal level of moderator protection
As I recall, I didn't ask the mods to do jack, and that criticism of my person is null, along with all the other times I have been called a faggot by you. But since this situation has gotten way out of control since the start, my feelings indeed do matter to me, I'm spent, and I want to be a pain in nobody's ass, I'm just going to bail for as long of a while as I'm able and let you gents handle it. Cheers.
Anonymous
e02e585
?
No.147289
>>147288
>>147275
This poor excuse of a conversation is toxic and is going nowhere.
Perhaps it's time to put this theory to test, with an internet duel.