Has anyponer ever thought of using a video game to settle an internet argument, like a 1v1 game, fighting or FPS, as a duel of sorts? Is this already a thing? Can we make this happen concurrently with mlpol.net, or would there be too many complications with OPSEC? Posting here, let me know if it should move to /qa/.
Have at you!
/vx/ - Videogames and Paranormal
78 replies and 23 files omitted.
>>148034
>or even in their case injury or death to stand by it
>their
Southerners, jousting knights, et cetera.
>or even in their case injury or death to stand by it
>their
Southerners, jousting knights, et cetera.
1624318910.png (11.1 KB, 128x128, 0E7D9C78E6EAAC44AD9F5CEB8D9B6688-11350.png)
>>148034
Ah! A test of mettle and honor is quite different. The ideas aren't at stake it's the core personality and ego that is to be determined the trust worthiness.
So for the traditional games is Chess, Go, or other board games. Or even checkers. Letters passing back and forth the decisions. But the personality and honour may or may not be tested.
In extreme danger work, absolutely brutal ribbing.
Hmmmm.
Going to be don't sweat it. Single player games, or reasonable challenges will work too, because the point isn't only to win. It's to form a more cohesive community, and bonds of mutual respect.
But that's not a satisfying answer, me saying it'll happen as it happens, how about a meme sling off?
Three pics or videos or audio then a poner that pulls those three things together. For each person.
Then what'll happen using 5 upload files when those two meet.
[Read more] Ah! A test of mettle and honor is quite different. The ideas aren't at stake it's the core personality and ego that is to be determined the trust worthiness.
So for the traditional games is Chess, Go, or other board games. Or even checkers. Letters passing back and forth the decisions. But the personality and honour may or may not be tested.
In extreme danger work, absolutely brutal ribbing.
Hmmmm.
Going to be don't sweat it. Single player games, or reasonable challenges will work too, because the point isn't only to win. It's to form a more cohesive community, and bonds of mutual respect.
But that's not a satisfying answer, me saying it'll happen as it happens, how about a meme sling off?
Three pics or videos or audio then a poner that pulls those three things together. For each person.
Then what'll happen using 5 upload files when those two meet.
>>148038
What does it say when someone accepts a duel and then intentionally throws the fight in such an obvious half-assed manner that to accept this victory as legitimate would make you look daft?
What does it say when someone accepts a duel and then intentionally throws the fight in such an obvious half-assed manner that to accept this victory as legitimate would make you look daft?
>>148036
Op-Sec.
Operational Security.
Giving jews a back door into your computer by using windows? Bad for security.
Op-Sec.
Operational Security.
Giving jews a back door into your computer by using windows? Bad for security.
>>148039
Tbh, I think that would be a moot point. Both parties would have wasted their time, and the match-thrower would have effectively lost in proving that he's the asshole.
Tbh, I think that would be a moot point. Both parties would have wasted their time, and the match-thrower would have effectively lost in proving that he's the asshole.
>>148038
I'm not so certain I could imagine what that would look like. Though I wouldn't be opposed to playing the odd game of chess or co-operative type game. Projects that pull the community together, like as in Ponies: The Continuation have been shown to be valuable exercises.
>>148039
This >>148041.
I'm not so certain I could imagine what that would look like. Though I wouldn't be opposed to playing the odd game of chess or co-operative type game. Projects that pull the community together, like as in Ponies: The Continuation have been shown to be valuable exercises.
>>148039
This >>148041.
>>148074
I disagree. What you propose would discourage people from participating in the first place.
The loss of the "duel" should mean little more than embarrassment on part of the losing party: those stakes are plenty high for an internet argument.
I disagree. What you propose would discourage people from participating in the first place.
The loss of the "duel" should mean little more than embarrassment on part of the losing party: those stakes are plenty high for an internet argument.
>>148075
Fair enough, although I think that's something that could be left to the challengers in question; regardless the way I see it is that it's not something we need to decide in the here and now. Soon as I rope together a way to get this thing started the details could end up falling into place on their own.
Fair enough, although I think that's something that could be left to the challengers in question; regardless the way I see it is that it's not something we need to decide in the here and now. Soon as I rope together a way to get this thing started the details could end up falling into place on their own.
Quick update, as some might've been able to guess, a VM is not going to work, there's just no comparison for something that would require any reaction times at all even playing a simple flash game, and as of right now a KVM is off the table. So, I'll check back in soon as I have a fresh Linux install working on bare metal. Then, all that would need to happen is I figure out how to host on joshwhotv with any and all necessary security measures in place, and then decide on a game that could be played 1v1 for a friendly test run or two. Right now I'm thinking the simpler the better, but we could get something more interesting going later on.
>>148034
>I didn't come here necessarily to pitch an idea
Then what DID you come here for?
>thread derailed
>oh no, my idea is getting btfo, its DERAILMENT
Leaving aside the obvious and dubious concept
OP is a faggot, and anyone who wishes to challenge that assertion has to test the idea with a thumb war or forever leave the site.
See how retarded that sounds?
>I didn't come here necessarily to pitch an idea
Then what DID you come here for?
>thread derailed
>oh no, my idea is getting btfo, its DERAILMENT
Leaving aside the obvious and dubious concept
OP is a faggot, and anyone who wishes to challenge that assertion has to test the idea with a thumb war or forever leave the site.
See how retarded that sounds?
>>148143
OP does seem like a faggot. It's accepting the physical risk of real physical injury, pain, even death for the sake of your beliefs that make accepting the challenge of a duel into an act of manliness. Anyone can lose some tic-tac-toe game and then suffer some arbitrary punishment when the stakes are low but in politics the stakes are life and death. This isn't a WWE esports board where "loser gets banned for a week" is used to spice up a match like old wrestling "loser leaves town" matches. The turth isn't up to interpretation and the outcome of NBA 2k69 online matches won't affect it. Maybe this would be a fun way to resolve unimportant and childish personal disputes on gaming sites, but to suggest settling meaningful mature arguments with a game of fucking Yugioh is asinine. If the leftists take over countries they kill people. If the leftists take over discussion boards they turn them into conquered territory where discussions are controlled and leftism is mandatory. If the leftists convince normies they are the majority, normies will go along with the falsehood in the name of conformity. I love the 4chan cup as much as the next real man but do you think if our team fought some commie imageboard's team and won they'd actually honour any agreement they made?
>>148149
That's dumb. The stakes for a match should be proportional to the issue at hand, and internet disagreements aren't serious at all.
That's dumb. The stakes for a match should be proportional to the issue at hand, and internet disagreements aren't serious at all.
If I challenged someone to a match in a game they didn't own and had never played, what happens then?
>>148147
Why would getting baited into gaming battles instead of rational arguments be a step in the right direction?
Why would getting baited into gaming battles instead of rational arguments be a step in the right direction?
>>148150
>internet disagreements aren't serious at all
You might be right there, but I'd like to make a distinction between a disagreement and something that just devolves into petty namecalling, which at this point I must regret to say has sapped a lot of strength not to engage in myself. If you'll look at the timestamps of this thread I left not only this thread but the website as a whole for about a month on my own due to not wanting to be around a certain someone. I, for one, would consider that serious business, as I can be a pretty active user; and the way I see it, if an internet fight isn't taken seriously at all in the first place, neither should be a ban. Perhaps if you want to look at it this way, the predetermined punishment as outlined in the agreed-upon terms would only be as serious as the offense someone took. Tit for tat.
>>148151
I was starting to think along the same lines, though that's something that I think should be left up to the challengers, and after the fight, someone could choose either not to enforce it, or do so less than the agreed upon terms if they wanted as a show of mercy. Much like firing into the air in the South of the 19th century.
>>148152
>It wouldn't be hard to just pretend to leave, and continue to post anonymously.
This is true, and something I alluded to in >>148074 when I mentioned:
>This is the type of thing that really only works if a lot of people are on board with it, and people are willing to exhibit a sense of shame.
For example, if someone loses a duel and comes back before their time is up, that would be a dishonorable thing to do, as in someone that shows a bit of shame wouldn't do such a thing, and if they were found out, a technique to try could be that the user is called out and banned for a longer time. One might be surprised at how hard it is to keep the "facts" straight, should they begin to lie under questioning.
Of course, it wouldn't hurt at least by ceremony, should the esteemed moderators think it a decent idea and strike an IP on the banlist.
The world's really our oyster here, folks. The way I see it, we can do this, or not, any way the community likes.
Meanwhile I've installed another OS on my computer, and the next step is going to be to do a bit of groundwork when it comes to security settings, and then all that would have to happen is I find a game to play. But I'm beat for now so I'm going to have to do that another time.
And if anyone doesn't think this kind of thing could be a big deal, may I invite you to look at how much money and ceremony has gone into boxing matches over the past century, and in this one how video games are picking up steam in esports leagues. When there's competition and consequences involved, things can start to become a big deal pretty quick. Can I at least say it's worth a shot, if I'm the one that lays all the groundwork for it?
[Read more] >internet disagreements aren't serious at all
You might be right there, but I'd like to make a distinction between a disagreement and something that just devolves into petty namecalling, which at this point I must regret to say has sapped a lot of strength not to engage in myself. If you'll look at the timestamps of this thread I left not only this thread but the website as a whole for about a month on my own due to not wanting to be around a certain someone. I, for one, would consider that serious business, as I can be a pretty active user; and the way I see it, if an internet fight isn't taken seriously at all in the first place, neither should be a ban. Perhaps if you want to look at it this way, the predetermined punishment as outlined in the agreed-upon terms would only be as serious as the offense someone took. Tit for tat.
>>148151
I was starting to think along the same lines, though that's something that I think should be left up to the challengers, and after the fight, someone could choose either not to enforce it, or do so less than the agreed upon terms if they wanted as a show of mercy. Much like firing into the air in the South of the 19th century.
>>148152
>It wouldn't be hard to just pretend to leave, and continue to post anonymously.
This is true, and something I alluded to in >>148074 when I mentioned:
>This is the type of thing that really only works if a lot of people are on board with it, and people are willing to exhibit a sense of shame.
For example, if someone loses a duel and comes back before their time is up, that would be a dishonorable thing to do, as in someone that shows a bit of shame wouldn't do such a thing, and if they were found out, a technique to try could be that the user is called out and banned for a longer time. One might be surprised at how hard it is to keep the "facts" straight, should they begin to lie under questioning.
Of course, it wouldn't hurt at least by ceremony, should the esteemed moderators think it a decent idea and strike an IP on the banlist.
The world's really our oyster here, folks. The way I see it, we can do this, or not, any way the community likes.
Meanwhile I've installed another OS on my computer, and the next step is going to be to do a bit of groundwork when it comes to security settings, and then all that would have to happen is I find a game to play. But I'm beat for now so I'm going to have to do that another time.
And if anyone doesn't think this kind of thing could be a big deal, may I invite you to look at how much money and ceremony has gone into boxing matches over the past century, and in this one how video games are picking up steam in esports leagues. When there's competition and consequences involved, things can start to become a big deal pretty quick. Can I at least say it's worth a shot, if I'm the one that lays all the groundwork for it?
>>148157
>>148158
Look mate, no offense but I feel like I've already said my piece on these questions here, and honestly we're all in the process of figuring this out in case I haven't. In case honor is not something that's easily understood here, I'd compare it to the theory of General Relativity, which is said to be hard to understand for those that don't know, and hard to explain for those that do. Read up on Robert E. Lee if you would, or perhaps Admiral Horatio Nelson would be a bit closer to home for you, whom on a cursory glance had a reputation for valor and duty, those two concepts being close in connection to it.
>>148158
Look mate, no offense but I feel like I've already said my piece on these questions here, and honestly we're all in the process of figuring this out in case I haven't. In case honor is not something that's easily understood here, I'd compare it to the theory of General Relativity, which is said to be hard to understand for those that don't know, and hard to explain for those that do. Read up on Robert E. Lee if you would, or perhaps Admiral Horatio Nelson would be a bit closer to home for you, whom on a cursory glance had a reputation for valor and duty, those two concepts being close in connection to it.
>>148152
Yea That Could Be a problem. i dont really have a solution for this problem.
>>148159
Adorable. AJ Pic.
>No Neo Confederate GF
Why live?
>I was starting to think along the same lines, though that's something that I think should be left up to the challengers, and after the fight, someone could choose either not to enforce it, or do so less than the agreed upon terms if they wanted as a show of mercy. Much like firing into the air in the South of the 19th century.
I Could not agree more.
>>148158
Because Honor is more important than Debate.
[Read more] Yea That Could Be a problem. i dont really have a solution for this problem.
>>148159
Adorable. AJ Pic.
>No Neo Confederate GF
Why live?
>I was starting to think along the same lines, though that's something that I think should be left up to the challengers, and after the fight, someone could choose either not to enforce it, or do so less than the agreed upon terms if they wanted as a show of mercy. Much like firing into the air in the South of the 19th century.
I Could not agree more.
>>148158
Because Honor is more important than Debate.
>>148159
>I left the site cuz someone rustled my jimmies
>but you guys should totally want me around
>>148160
When you say 'honor', are you referring to when you started accusing me of your paranoid delusions because I trashed your idea?
Look, if you wanna make some sort of /mlpol/ fighting/gaming league, knock yourself out. Then, if you want to challenge assholes to a match, have at it. But dont expect whatever you do to have any legitimacy outside of any personally and individually agreed (read: a gentleman's contract) scope or contest. Competition is fine, and I admit such a situation could help individuals to settle their differences, but that is not something that should have any weight in an argument, and the idea that it 'should' ought to raise alarm bells.
>I left the site cuz someone rustled my jimmies
>but you guys should totally want me around
>>148160
When you say 'honor', are you referring to when you started accusing me of your paranoid delusions because I trashed your idea?
Look, if you wanna make some sort of /mlpol/ fighting/gaming league, knock yourself out. Then, if you want to challenge assholes to a match, have at it. But dont expect whatever you do to have any legitimacy outside of any personally and individually agreed (read: a gentleman's contract) scope or contest. Competition is fine, and I admit such a situation could help individuals to settle their differences, but that is not something that should have any weight in an argument, and the idea that it 'should' ought to raise alarm bells.
>>148160
Insulting my honour for not getting baited into pointless fights makes no sense. You're trying to start an unnecessary fight with everyone who understands why the unnecessary fights you're offering are pointless.
Insulting my honour for not getting baited into pointless fights makes no sense. You're trying to start an unnecessary fight with everyone who understands why the unnecessary fights you're offering are pointless.
>>148162
There is no objective legitimacy in internet arguments. Just assholes who don't know when to shut up.
There is no objective legitimacy in internet arguments. Just assholes who don't know when to shut up.
>>148163
>Insulting my honour
It's an internet argument. Your honor is going to be insulted either way.
>Insulting my honour
It's an internet argument. Your honor is going to be insulted either way.
>>148162
>When you say 'honor', are you referring to when you started accusing me of your paranoid delusions because I trashed your idea?
Hell no, I'm referring to when you barged into the thread to say against my character among other things, and I quote, "get fucked."
>Look, if you wanna make some sort of /mlpol/ fighting/gaming league, knock yourself out. Then, if you want to challenge assholes to a match, have at it. But dont expect whatever you do to have any legitimacy outside of any personally and individually agreed (read: a gentleman's contract) scope or contest. Competition is fine, and I admit such a situation could help individuals to settle their differences, but that is not something that should have any weight in an argument, and the idea that it 'should' ought to raise alarm bells.
Yeah that's a fair assessment to espouse. Just don't tell me to get fucked or generally act disrespectful towards me or we're going to have a problem. Everyone's got a line pal, and I've been gracious enough thus far to look past both the times you've crossed mine.
>When you say 'honor', are you referring to when you started accusing me of your paranoid delusions because I trashed your idea?
Hell no, I'm referring to when you barged into the thread to say against my character among other things, and I quote, "get fucked."
>Look, if you wanna make some sort of /mlpol/ fighting/gaming league, knock yourself out. Then, if you want to challenge assholes to a match, have at it. But dont expect whatever you do to have any legitimacy outside of any personally and individually agreed (read: a gentleman's contract) scope or contest. Competition is fine, and I admit such a situation could help individuals to settle their differences, but that is not something that should have any weight in an argument, and the idea that it 'should' ought to raise alarm bells.
Yeah that's a fair assessment to espouse. Just don't tell me to get fucked or generally act disrespectful towards me or we're going to have a problem. Everyone's got a line pal, and I've been gracious enough thus far to look past both the times you've crossed mine.
>>148164
Do you think this will go in circles forever?
>"come on guys, playing chess with commies will totally prove we're smarter than them and if we beat them they'll totally honour any agreements they made! if they don't we can laugh at them for being dishonourable- what do you mean we already knew this?"
Do you think this will go in circles forever?
>"come on guys, playing chess with commies will totally prove we're smarter than them and if we beat them they'll totally honour any agreements they made! if they don't we can laugh at them for being dishonourable- what do you mean we already knew this?"
...
Fucking hell. There was a time when the cesspool site cough 4cuck cough was considered a hurtbox. Usually shanked with truth, and at times empty words.
I mean way wayyyy more brutal. Just ripping people to shreds and the only thing keeping it from going overboard was anonymity and the quantity of posts speeding by.
So to be frank that's not going to work here. Even if there was a bloodbath thread/board jimmies are going to be rustled. This doesn't give something that bonds people together with, heck the only thing that the hurtbox gave to bond over with was painful truth.
That's why blood feuds were a thing as people kept going back and forth getting revenge for sullying the family honor.
Destroying good people and their lineage.
Okay, but the inverse is also true. Not going into full retaliation to the strike is where we are at now. As in many traditions and people have been chipped away and washed out by fuckers. It brings about the snobbery and backstabbing.
So fine the two far ends have their problems, but surely something can be done about people calling each other faggots or fuckwads right?
Well technically yes, use more creative insults. But to be fair the real issue is that spillover into other threads is the issue along with it being seemingly unending.
The solution is just as simple rule 1 rule 2 thread. You have shit to unload do it there. What happens in rule 1 rule 2 threads says in rule 1 rule 2 thread.
Okay, but some threads have a... visitor of the monetary sort with an agenda, or someone from a hugbox who stumbled here as stated hoers pussy and truth works together 99.99% of the time.
Okay but that didn't really solve the issue because it's about ego and the feelings. On the other hand seeing the same dude say the same things can be aggrovating.
But honestly being able to say fuck off to what is essentially psychological w... fisty cuffs of big scale is a handy skill to refine, and then turn that barb around.
[Read more] Fucking hell. There was a time when the cesspool site cough 4cuck cough was considered a hurtbox. Usually shanked with truth, and at times empty words.
I mean way wayyyy more brutal. Just ripping people to shreds and the only thing keeping it from going overboard was anonymity and the quantity of posts speeding by.
So to be frank that's not going to work here. Even if there was a bloodbath thread/board jimmies are going to be rustled. This doesn't give something that bonds people together with, heck the only thing that the hurtbox gave to bond over with was painful truth.
That's why blood feuds were a thing as people kept going back and forth getting revenge for sullying the family honor.
Destroying good people and their lineage.
Okay, but the inverse is also true. Not going into full retaliation to the strike is where we are at now. As in many traditions and people have been chipped away and washed out by fuckers. It brings about the snobbery and backstabbing.
So fine the two far ends have their problems, but surely something can be done about people calling each other faggots or fuckwads right?
Well technically yes, use more creative insults. But to be fair the real issue is that spillover into other threads is the issue along with it being seemingly unending.
The solution is just as simple rule 1 rule 2 thread. You have shit to unload do it there. What happens in rule 1 rule 2 threads says in rule 1 rule 2 thread.
Okay, but some threads have a... visitor of the monetary sort with an agenda, or someone from a hugbox who stumbled here as stated hoers pussy and truth works together 99.99% of the time.
Okay but that didn't really solve the issue because it's about ego and the feelings. On the other hand seeing the same dude say the same things can be aggrovating.
But honestly being able to say fuck off to what is essentially psychological w... fisty cuffs of big scale is a handy skill to refine, and then turn that barb around.
>>148173
Thank you
>>148172
You, get fucked 2x. What are we, guidance counselors worrying about offending sensibilities? We gotta worry about feelings and impressions and shit? Jesus christ, anon used to have some balls. I'm not besmirching frenship, but some frens use tough love; it's a thing, quit being a faggot.
Thank you
>>148172
You, get fucked 2x. What are we, guidance counselors worrying about offending sensibilities? We gotta worry about feelings and impressions and shit? Jesus christ, anon used to have some balls. I'm not besmirching frenship, but some frens use tough love; it's a thing, quit being a faggot.
>>148173
>Pic 4
"I Have Heard of People converting from a lie to the truth,But not once have i heard of someone converting from the truth to a lie." - Commander George Lincoln Rockwell(R.I.P)
>Pic 4
"I Have Heard of People converting from a lie to the truth,But not once have i heard of someone converting from the truth to a lie." - Commander George Lincoln Rockwell(R.I.P)
>>148175
It's not about offending sensibilities. You just suck at arguing if you think telling people to get fucked will somehow convince them.
So, without further ado, get fucked.
It's not about offending sensibilities. You just suck at arguing if you think telling people to get fucked will somehow convince them.
So, without further ado, get fucked.
1624496806_3.png (79.3 KB, 1000x500, 100C2366666902220C11EBA891A3EF8E-81229.png)
1624496806_4.png (207.9 KB, 713x541, 0EF0F2FDA4392494D3E98CD8FDA55035-212851.png)
1624496806_5.jpg (147.6 KB, 1300x900, 8798D98ED41ECD96D342E6D625B4AD6E-151159.jpg)
Okay so that's part A the /pol/
>>148173
This is now part B the /mlp/
The friendship part
>>147208
>>148038
So hear me out, cooperative games/activities.
Instead of shank of truth where is smarts quite a bit, it's the velvety glove of truth to softly strangle the best a person can be by their own will. Basically advanced trickery, but everyone is having a great time aka leadership and follower dynamics (they alternate an dhappen at the same time to lead both parties to better places).
There are six principles that govern it and I'll just reiterate them.
Laughter
Kindness
Generosity
Honesty
Loyalty
Friendship (magic which in part also means actively pursuing friendship)
So the reasoning stands that a spectator game (or one with even more players) could work to enhance bonds and sooth ego (usually by way of working well as a team does accomplish more, even if in different ways).
This six part system is also a quantifiable metric (to an extent).
With that said instead of a means to ridicule and demean, it ought to be used to build up and improve while also providing good sunshine examples.
All of the above have to be done in good faith, even if it's grumbling good faith. That means if someone gets suckered punched it's going to hurt more, and that's counterproductive.
A common goal that is to be entertaining, completing the objective, and strengthening friendship.
[Read more] >>148173
This is now part B the /mlp/
The friendship part
>>147208
>>148038
So hear me out, cooperative games/activities.
Instead of shank of truth where is smarts quite a bit, it's the velvety glove of truth to softly strangle the best a person can be by their own will. Basically advanced trickery, but everyone is having a great time aka leadership and follower dynamics (they alternate an dhappen at the same time to lead both parties to better places).
There are six principles that govern it and I'll just reiterate them.
Laughter
Kindness
Generosity
Honesty
Loyalty
Friendship (magic which in part also means actively pursuing friendship)
So the reasoning stands that a spectator game (or one with even more players) could work to enhance bonds and sooth ego (usually by way of working well as a team does accomplish more, even if in different ways).
This six part system is also a quantifiable metric (to an extent).
With that said instead of a means to ridicule and demean, it ought to be used to build up and improve while also providing good sunshine examples.
All of the above have to be done in good faith, even if it's grumbling good faith. That means if someone gets suckered punched it's going to hurt more, and that's counterproductive.
A common goal that is to be entertaining, completing the objective, and strengthening friendship.
>>148177
Gladly, though you'll pardon any seeming indecisiveness as I work the details out. In the meantime, you've yet admit address my salient point. Unless you wanna internet duel, that's where your attention should be focused.
Gladly, though you'll pardon any seeming indecisiveness as I work the details out. In the meantime, you've yet admit address my salient point. Unless you wanna internet duel, that's where your attention should be focused.
1624498814_1.png (45.8 KB, 389x213, F25F96570098ECF2BCD6D7E9BB6DF390-46891.png)
1624498814_2.png (376.8 KB, 600x675, C728F111F3AB7A597808015A5E550556-385865.png)
>>148173
>>148178
Okay so both parts are not actually mutually exclusive. They work extremely well together. In every aspect.
So what just keep blasting each other with truth designed to maximize harm and somehow friendship? Well.. I mean... it could work...
Nah, tactics, efficiency, effectiveness, and redundancy points that bring stuck in a corner with someone is a pretty neat place to find friends. Even by happenstance.
So the Friendship part has to be taken into account for all matters.
Even in truth speedy poking matches with gibblets spewing everywhere.
So why bring this up?
Common goals. Commies tend to put their asinine whatever crap as their one and onky thing they offer. They don't really have true true friends. They themselves don't exhibit friendship.
So we're not Globalist (((fuckwads))) yay us.
We're also quite different at times as well with disagreements and such.
Sometimes amazing things can only happen when certain people come into contact through different times and circumstances to have be done.
Being in a shitstorm flinging match and mutual jokes is a good time. So is watching people do something amazing!
Even when the activity is seemingly meaningless on the grand scale small acts bring us all closer to friendship and truth.
Because those small acts are what actually destroy evil from creeping in, and brings about good into the world and ourselves.
While learning /mlpol/ lessons along the way.
<The fuck are you saying zigger.
Punch people with friendship in heart and in hand only playing by truth, while also getting punched by friendship.
More exactly 1v1 and multiple people are both valid, just gotta be painfully true at all times with friendship.
<inb4 NiggerFaggotCocksuckerSpeedInsultChess with friends.
[Read more] >>148178
Okay so both parts are not actually mutually exclusive. They work extremely well together. In every aspect.
So what just keep blasting each other with truth designed to maximize harm and somehow friendship? Well.. I mean... it could work...
Nah, tactics, efficiency, effectiveness, and redundancy points that bring stuck in a corner with someone is a pretty neat place to find friends. Even by happenstance.
So the Friendship part has to be taken into account for all matters.
Even in truth speedy poking matches with gibblets spewing everywhere.
So why bring this up?
Common goals. Commies tend to put their asinine whatever crap as their one and onky thing they offer. They don't really have true true friends. They themselves don't exhibit friendship.
So we're not Globalist (((fuckwads))) yay us.
We're also quite different at times as well with disagreements and such.
Sometimes amazing things can only happen when certain people come into contact through different times and circumstances to have be done.
Being in a shitstorm flinging match and mutual jokes is a good time. So is watching people do something amazing!
Even when the activity is seemingly meaningless on the grand scale small acts bring us all closer to friendship and truth.
Because those small acts are what actually destroy evil from creeping in, and brings about good into the world and ourselves.
While learning /mlpol/ lessons along the way.
<The fuck are you saying zigger.
Punch people with friendship in heart and in hand only playing by truth, while also getting punched by friendship.
More exactly 1v1 and multiple people are both valid, just gotta be painfully true at all times with friendship.
<inb4 NiggerFaggotCocksuckerSpeedInsultChess with friends.
So when I call someone a fucktarded assblasted halfcocked nohooves lover. That's not actually completely true, just uhhh expressing the feelings inside in a neither constructive nor destructive manner, but the intent afterward and deep down under the rage and disbelief is friendship and truth... somewhere
That didn't mean the words are all that effective, but it does mean they could do with a tune up for maximum penetration.
Cause those words arn't that great.
So instead I'll say
>foight yah mate?
<yah cheeky breeky
>chess mate?
<nah mate, how about a round of the ol tounge slappy?
>noice yeah slick cunt. Inna remaned pic yeh?
<painted pic too yeh?
>Yeah!
<Yeah!
>Technically Mission Failed Successfully.
With the purpose being to disarm grudges as a side effect. Any means can take place as long as all parts are exhibited fully like a starker streaker throwing pork in halal factories.
[Read more] That didn't mean the words are all that effective, but it does mean they could do with a tune up for maximum penetration.
Cause those words arn't that great.
So instead I'll say
>foight yah mate?
<yah cheeky breeky
>chess mate?
<nah mate, how about a round of the ol tounge slappy?
>noice yeah slick cunt. Inna remaned pic yeh?
<painted pic too yeh?
>Yeah!
<Yeah!
>Technically Mission Failed Successfully.
With the purpose being to disarm grudges as a side effect. Any means can take place as long as all parts are exhibited fully like a starker streaker throwing pork in halal factories.
>>148183
Ngl, this is spot on. If a dude cant take a good ribbing, then hes not worth shit. But if he can, I might toast him.
OP could learn a thing about it.
Ngl, this is spot on. If a dude cant take a good ribbing, then hes not worth shit. But if he can, I might toast him.
OP could learn a thing about it.
[Reply] [Last 50 Posts] [Last 100 Posts] [Last 200 Posts]
You are viewing older replies. Click [View All] or [Last n Posts] to vew latest posts.
Clicking update will load all posts posted after last post on this page.
Post pagination: [Prev] [1-50] [51-100] [101-128] [Next] [Live (last 50 replies)]
128 replies | 45 files | 34 UUIDs | Page 14
[Add to Thread Watcher]