Beyond that, here you can sit with a pint and link-to/roast ANY thread/post on the board and say what you think about it WITHOUT derailing, and theres no IDs to filter, so you can be as much of a shit as ye want. Cmon anon, let's get pissed.
>In the interest of providing an alternative to thread derailment by honest and organic conversation, this thread is dedicated to anything off-topic that is desired to be discussed
As OP of the first pony pub, it isnt surprising that yet another of my efforts have been coopted. Par for the course, at that. Its almost like the sote is full of cot-tail hanging faggots who cant manage a unique thought even when combined into a group.
>>19892>yet another of my efforts have been cooptedWat?
You abandoned the bread and I rescued it, exactly as it was, for everyponer' sake.
Copied word by word as an testimony and homage to the original OP. You should thank me.
>>19892Don't be so petty for a change. Everyone knows it was your idea.
>>19894Not him, but we don't really need these breads bumped to the top of the overboard. It is supposed to contain drama in a way.
>>19892>looking for recognition>prideIt a bit narcissist. Is it?
>>19892>cooptedWhat are you talking about?
The last thread was somewhere between a random shitposting thread and a containment thread for off-topic arguments from other boards. What was there to be coopted?
Wtf even is the problem here?
The last thread still has a good 12 years left in it at the current rate
>>19894>abandoned breadNo nigger, I have several of the latest posts to that bread, and I check it regularly. It didnt need reviving, it was precisely where/what it was intended to be. Make all the excuses you want, you're a faggot who has mo business reprising other anon's threads.
>>19895Get fucked. There was/is no purpose to reposting this thread.
>>19896FUCKING THIS
>>19897>its narcissistic to take exception to someone stealing the intent of several months of effortThanks for posting, Lotus
>>19898The fact that there are two threads, one operating outside the original intent? The fact that there is nothing wrong with the previous thread, except for those who absolutely have to be on the overboard all the time? I guess you're just thick. Unsurprising.
>>19899You ESPECIALLY can get fucked
>>19900Based
>>19901>lol mom! I posted No U on the internet!It didnt have to be this way.
>>19896I can agree with that, tbh.
>>19905>It didnt have to be this way.And yet, this bread is up and running spouting drama non stop!!!
Bring it on!
>all this petty drama on both sides
You guys are fags.
>>19907Make all the excuses and le smug pony reactions you want. The original thread was intended to squash drama. This thread is clearly intended as the opposite.
>>19911Knew it was you, very based poster indeed.
>>19912I'm not the hapafag, but I agree with you.
>>19910Who the fuck is "hapafag", and what does that have to do with my post?
>>19905>operating outside the original intent?Since when do chansites threads, let alone series of threads adhere to OPs' "original intent"? It's an anonymous image board, ffs, not a subreddit: OPs have no control of what other posters choose to make of their threads.
Getting pussy because someone "coopetd" a thread you made on an image board just makes you look like a retard. If you don't like the thread, just ignore it. This feels like the faggots on /mlp/ who get all mad when a general deviates from their "original idea": nobody gives a fuck.
>>19918In any case, staff's being very clear about their intent to avoid drama last time
at all costs.If they allow this bread to go on, that would indicate that their previous stance was just an excuse to fuck with ninjas.
Am not defending his petty outburst of faggotry, but am not the only one who's tired of your pissing contest.
Lotus, know you're lurking. I've done so much to avoid further drama with nigel. More often than not, adverting that which I wasn't even involved on. This obvious attempt to fuel more drama is gay af. >>19922Oh, their previous stance WAS just an excuse to fuck with Ninjas, make no mistake.
Having said, its /sp/; Thou shalt have no rules before Football. I'm not saying OP CAN'T steal my bread/project
I still have my bread to post/link to so Idgaf functionally, I'm just saying he's a faggot and that I have nothing to do with and am opposed to it. Hate to say it, but I'd let it stay.
>>19926OP here.
(You) paranoid people are prime candidate for the straitjacket.
I reposted this bread to have fun, if you suffer from hysteria, that's your business.
By the way, I have nothing to do with the staff and your petty squabbles.
>>19930>I have nothing to do with the staffNever implied you did, I merely stated the effects of this thread in its current direction.
>petty squabblesFirst one to call it petty bitching.
I nevertheless, trashed the NORDcissism thread cuz OP was trying to start shit yet again with the local autist. Never imagined that staff would jump over and start more drama anyways.Have the last post Itt if you will.
>>19930>more gaslightingIta not paranoia when you have screencaps
>>19931Your illustrations of narcissistic behavior were quite useful. I hope you'll include more. Be sure to include more rationalizations and justifications, those are especially effective.
>last post ITTLol no, the annexation has already begun. Have a face-planted kitten
>>19942>more gaslightingOP here again.
Sorry, but nope. You've got the wrong pone, poner.
>>19945As I said, its not paranoia when you can prove it
>calling someone paranoid isnt gaslightingWew
>>19946Well, I made this bread to light up Friendship, but some poners are really butthurt and won't let go.
It's not my fault (you) see ghost opponents everywhere. I think that's an over-reaction and is not good for (you).
>>19947>see ghost poners everywhereI dont know what you're talking about. Care to validate that position?
>>19949>Care to validate that position?I'm the wrong poner, sorry.
>>19978Yeah.
Where are all those promised pony breads? Ah?
Post ponies or KYS faggots.