Post here to reply to locked threads without bumping them.
/qa/ - Questions and Answers
Keeping the community together by giving you a voice
>>7644 →
>>7707 →
>moderators won’t remove “embarrassing” posts, they’ll only remove things like personally identifying information
I really don't get this: why would the mods want to go about removing info without removing the posts themselves? Most of those posts are in the archive and don't contribute any value to our community. Imo, editing posts is cringe and it's better to just delete them if there's a problem with them.
I get that he's asking for a lot, but is there really anything wrong with just getting rid of the threads?
>>7707 →
>moderators won’t remove “embarrassing” posts, they’ll only remove things like personally identifying information
I really don't get this: why would the mods want to go about removing info without removing the posts themselves? Most of those posts are in the archive and don't contribute any value to our community. Imo, editing posts is cringe and it's better to just delete them if there's a problem with them.
I get that he's asking for a lot, but is there really anything wrong with just getting rid of the threads?
>>7712
>Imo, editing posts is cringe and it's better to just delete them if there's a problem with them.
You seem to have misinterpreted what we were asking him to do. Nobody said anything about editing his posts. What we asked was for him to report the individual posts he was concerned about, and we would delete those posts if they did indeed contain identifying info about someone.
>I get that he's asking for a lot, but is there really anything wrong with just getting rid of the threads?
He wanted four entire threads deleted from /ub/, because he attests that somewhere in the thread are posts he made that give away personal information about people he knows. All four of these threads are huge and have hundreds of replies, and they have been on the board for years. The oldest one dates back to 2019, the other three are from 2020. He has been posting in these threads regularly himself over that same time period. The most recent post was made last week.
What he was asking for was unreasonable, but we made him a reasonable counter offer. All he had to do was to go through his own threads, find the posts he was concerned about, report them, and provide a brief explanation as to why he wanted each post removed.
However, instead of doing this, he chose to sperg out and throw another of his usual tantrums, in which he blames everyone but himself for the outcome of his own actions. Moreover, he has a long, long, LONG established pattern of similar toxic behavior on this site. As such, we have decided that we are just not going to help him at all.
>Imo, editing posts is cringe and it's better to just delete them if there's a problem with them.
You seem to have misinterpreted what we were asking him to do. Nobody said anything about editing his posts. What we asked was for him to report the individual posts he was concerned about, and we would delete those posts if they did indeed contain identifying info about someone.
>I get that he's asking for a lot, but is there really anything wrong with just getting rid of the threads?
He wanted four entire threads deleted from /ub/, because he attests that somewhere in the thread are posts he made that give away personal information about people he knows. All four of these threads are huge and have hundreds of replies, and they have been on the board for years. The oldest one dates back to 2019, the other three are from 2020. He has been posting in these threads regularly himself over that same time period. The most recent post was made last week.
What he was asking for was unreasonable, but we made him a reasonable counter offer. All he had to do was to go through his own threads, find the posts he was concerned about, report them, and provide a brief explanation as to why he wanted each post removed.
However, instead of doing this, he chose to sperg out and throw another of his usual tantrums, in which he blames everyone but himself for the outcome of his own actions. Moreover, he has a long, long, LONG established pattern of similar toxic behavior on this site. As such, we have decided that we are just not going to help him at all.
>>7707 →
>I was strongly opposed, because Nigel wasn’t breaking any official rules
"If you are being too mean, you might get banned". Is not an official rule either.
>>7718 →
>It's a fair point, although we wouldn't even be having this discussion if he hadn't lost the passwords to delete said threads: an ability that OPs have by default, and I don't think there's any real statute of limitations on that except for how long one keeps the password (which he has of course lost, and thus lost the ability). Someone else deleting a thread isn't that different from him deleting them himself.
It's not like he's been sent to the guillotine or something. Why are you so worried about this fag anyways?
>>7719
>As such, we have decided that we are just not going to help him at all.
At least you are trying your best, fam.
>I was strongly opposed, because Nigel wasn’t breaking any official rules
"If you are being too mean, you might get banned". Is not an official rule either.
>>7718 →
>It's a fair point, although we wouldn't even be having this discussion if he hadn't lost the passwords to delete said threads: an ability that OPs have by default, and I don't think there's any real statute of limitations on that except for how long one keeps the password (which he has of course lost, and thus lost the ability). Someone else deleting a thread isn't that different from him deleting them himself.
It's not like he's been sent to the guillotine or something. Why are you so worried about this fag anyways?
>>7719
>As such, we have decided that we are just not going to help him at all.
At least you are trying your best, fam.
>>7721
>"If you are being too mean, you might get banned". Is not an official rule either.
The hell are you bitching about?
>"If you are being too mean, you might get banned". Is not an official rule either.
The hell are you bitching about?
File (): D6585D36576D6C24E06BECB72F52D4FC-50593.jpg (49.4 KB, 800x582, 2248DC80-B718-4C6A-BD94-8A038678BC70.jpeg)
>>7712
I want the threads gone so they want to keep the threads up. They claim they'd accept a compromise: For me to go through each thread and find the worst post and make individual arguments for each post's removal. But do you really think they'd honour their own terms and accept any argument I make for deleting the posts?
They hate me more than they love innocent whites, and any principles they claim I ever violated are just post hoc contrivances, just excuses. Deleting those threads would save time and protect innocent lives. They want as few posts from those threads as possible (or none at all) deleted because they're spiteful like that as their actions show. When I post anything it's supposedly off topic but when I'm attacked for probably being nigel that's acceptable, and when somebody else is attacked for probably being nigel that's also acceptable apparently. The rules only exist when people staff don't like are violating them, otherwise who cares? Once upon a time about 3 pricks who talk and think the same started gaslighting people about me in various threads and stopped when called out, though it would not surprise me if it was all one redditor with a VPN/cafe with wifi nearby, and that is the tiresome "glimmernigger" drama and while some still seethe over it, calling this a "conspiracy" is the exact same shaming tactic jews use when they call noticing what "da joos" are doing a conspiracy theory. I wish White Genocide was more important to these people than me.
When "I hope your girlfriend gets doxxed" was said, the mask came off, and now we all know what type of people control this site.
I want the threads gone so they want to keep the threads up. They claim they'd accept a compromise: For me to go through each thread and find the worst post and make individual arguments for each post's removal. But do you really think they'd honour their own terms and accept any argument I make for deleting the posts?
They hate me more than they love innocent whites, and any principles they claim I ever violated are just post hoc contrivances, just excuses. Deleting those threads would save time and protect innocent lives. They want as few posts from those threads as possible (or none at all) deleted because they're spiteful like that as their actions show. When I post anything it's supposedly off topic but when I'm attacked for probably being nigel that's acceptable, and when somebody else is attacked for probably being nigel that's also acceptable apparently. The rules only exist when people staff don't like are violating them, otherwise who cares? Once upon a time about 3 pricks who talk and think the same started gaslighting people about me in various threads and stopped when called out, though it would not surprise me if it was all one redditor with a VPN/cafe with wifi nearby, and that is the tiresome "glimmernigger" drama and while some still seethe over it, calling this a "conspiracy" is the exact same shaming tactic jews use when they call noticing what "da joos" are doing a conspiracy theory. I wish White Genocide was more important to these people than me.
When "I hope your girlfriend gets doxxed" was said, the mask came off, and now we all know what type of people control this site.
File (): 24A64E2DE48CC576965C8B400B8EDCD1-1887693.png (1.8 MB, 1920x1080, 1145723.png)
>>7724
>I pretty sure he just concurred with lotus.
I have. But am also poking him with that ONE time when someone actually got banned for being too mean.
Here >>>/vx/146993 →
I don't want to raise the issue in any serious manner tho. It's old and cringe. Like I said, just poking him with it. Btw, Nigel was actually pretty funny in that thread.
>>7725
>When "I hope your girlfriend gets doxxed" was said, the mask came off, and now we all know what type of people control this site.
You are honestly fucking surreal. Tbh, Lotus' eternal and unyielding tolerance towards you is getting way out of control. He's metaphorically manhandling the rest of the staff just to help you.
And yet you are still here with your bullshit. How can you be this fucking deluded? Am astonished at the pace in which you dig yourself every time you post.
>I pretty sure he just concurred with lotus.
I have. But am also poking him with that ONE time when someone actually got banned for being too mean.
Here >>>/vx/146993 →
I don't want to raise the issue in any serious manner tho. It's old and cringe. Like I said, just poking him with it. Btw, Nigel was actually pretty funny in that thread.
>>7725
>When "I hope your girlfriend gets doxxed" was said, the mask came off, and now we all know what type of people control this site.
You are honestly fucking surreal. Tbh, Lotus' eternal and unyielding tolerance towards you is getting way out of control. He's metaphorically manhandling the rest of the staff just to help you.
And yet you are still here with your bullshit. How can you be this fucking deluded? Am astonished at the pace in which you dig yourself every time you post.
>>7726
>Am astonished at the pace in which you dig yourself every time you post.
Am astonished at the pace in which you bury yourself every time you post.*
>"ESL +1"
>Am astonished at the pace in which you dig yourself every time you post.
Am astonished at the pace in which you bury yourself every time you post.*
>"ESL +1"
>>7725
>When "I hope your girlfriend gets doxxed" was said, the mask came off, and now we all know what type of people control this site.
*IMAGINARY girlfriend.
>When "I hope your girlfriend gets doxxed" was said, the mask came off, and now we all know what type of people control this site.
*IMAGINARY girlfriend.
>>7725
Sven here. I during the last couple of days, I have actually been writing a big post about how I felt and so on so forth about all of this over the years, where I express that I'm sorry that thing went the way they did. I kinda still am to some degree but I don't wanna post it anymore. These latest posts from you makes me feel vindicated in some of my previous stands that I later had second thoughts on.
Like, what lotus said in one of these threads:
> We’re not willing to delete multiple entire threads containing hundreds and even thousands of posts by many people on the pure allegation that there’s totally some identifiable information in there somewhere trust-me-bro-but-I-don’t-trust-you-enough-to-tell-you where-it-is.
sums it up pretty well.
You do this too much: People, such as myself, give you constructive feedback and you start ranting about something completely tangiable (often about how ur a victim) instead of answering the questions and the points aimed at you. Very annoying.
How about u answer this question: Why should staff trust your claim that innocent lives are at stake if you can't trust them to delete the specific parts if you point it out to them?
Also,
>>7727
sure mekiko and me won't rite words well but you atleast we don't have your reading comprehension:
>If your imaginary girlfriend gets doxed, you have only yourself to blame. Sucks to be you.
-HW
<When "I hope your girlfriend gets doxxed" was said, the mask came off, and now we all know what type of people control this site.
-U
Sven here. I during the last couple of days, I have actually been writing a big post about how I felt and so on so forth about all of this over the years, where I express that I'm sorry that thing went the way they did. I kinda still am to some degree but I don't wanna post it anymore. These latest posts from you makes me feel vindicated in some of my previous stands that I later had second thoughts on.
Like, what lotus said in one of these threads:
> We’re not willing to delete multiple entire threads containing hundreds and even thousands of posts by many people on the pure allegation that there’s totally some identifiable information in there somewhere trust-me-bro-but-I-don’t-trust-you-enough-to-tell-you where-it-is.
sums it up pretty well.
You do this too much: People, such as myself, give you constructive feedback and you start ranting about something completely tangiable (often about how ur a victim) instead of answering the questions and the points aimed at you. Very annoying.
How about u answer this question: Why should staff trust your claim that innocent lives are at stake if you can't trust them to delete the specific parts if you point it out to them?
Also,
>>7727
sure mekiko and me won't rite words well but you atleast we don't have your reading comprehension:
>If your imaginary girlfriend gets doxed, you have only yourself to blame. Sucks to be you.
-HW
<When "I hope your girlfriend gets doxxed" was said, the mask came off, and now we all know what type of people control this site.
-U
File (): 2127380BC8E789AB7F53C77DBB43208E-358661.jpg (350.3 KB, 1920x1080, hu-tao-hd-wallpaper-1920x1080-70.jpg)
Anonymous
No.7731
File (): 553DF474DB30783210CBBADEF1883277-178470.jpg (174.3 KB, 1024x843, 1680012153599851.jpg)
Anonymous
No.7732
>>7730
Ah, okay. Than I'm sorry Nigel. He once commented on my esl issues so I thought it was him.
>>7725
>>7729
Btw, my question could be made even more specific since John Elway the horsewhisperer is Glimglam. If you two created burner emails you and use the site to confirm, you could just in private between you and GG on what things you want removed if you don't want to post on the site. Then you only involve GG.
So the question is then: Do you not trust GG to remove the these parts if you identified them to him?
Ah, okay. Than I'm sorry Nigel. He once commented on my esl issues so I thought it was him.
>>7725
>>7729
Btw, my question could be made even more specific since John Elway the horsewhisperer is Glimglam. If you two created burner emails you and use the site to confirm, you could just in private between you and GG on what things you want removed if you don't want to post on the site. Then you only involve GG.
So the question is then: Do you not trust GG to remove the these parts if you identified them to him?
>>7729
I don't mock people for how they talk.
I wish to delete my threads to protect people from potential internet harassment.
>"It's okay for us to refuse to let you protect people because we don't think they're real and you're not putting in the effort to tell us which specific posts you want gone and then create arguments that can convince even us why they must go"
These are post-hoc excuses for refusing to let me protect people who might exist. I see no reason why I should accept a compromise between the reasonable thing I want and the unreasonable position of those standing in the way of that specifically, as was openly stated, to spite me.
Deleting the threads would save a lot more time than combing through them for the worst posts. I'm just one person. I don't have the time for that but enemies of whites do. And how do I know any argument I make for deleting objectionable posts will be taken seriously, when my argument for deleting objectionable threads has been "This will protect people" and the response was "No way bro you just want to protect yourself and delete embarassing posts"? Any hints towards people in my life, even the smallest, could be used to narrow down possibilities when it comes to who I am or who others are. You've seen how people on the internet and those connected to them get harassed. I want to protect people.
When I am given valuable critique I listen, as evidenced in the pony fanfictions thread where I saw valuable writing advice amongst "Your character sucks gay sailor dicks lmao". Glim isn't a hater. Sven isn't a hater. Haters want to see me improve at things instead of resenting me for being bad at them. Haters feel justified in attacking people because it makes them feel superior and I've seen their type on countless sites that forgot their purpose. The /RWSS/ thread and other constructive threads like it that could actually hurt real leftists or help real whites or some mix of the two will never be as active as threads where all you have to say is "Here's another war crime the left did to us" or "Grr I can't believe that happened" or "Here is another political cartoon" or "Here is another cartoon I want to fuck". Haters hate and then contrive excuses why afterwards even if their behaviour (stalking me across the site, derailing threads to lie about me, gaslighting others about events that occured in threads still on the site) is more reprehensible than anything I've ever said or done. I'm an easy target for bullying because I believe in the good within people. "Fuck you nigel everything you do is wrong because you're the one doing it and you're always like this and you're never good and you're always bad and I feel nothing but hatred towards you" isn't valuable advice, it is just noise. I know it's just noise because I've listened to them. But they won't feel listened to until they feel catharsis. But didn't announcing my desire to leave give them that catharsis? Didn't they feel like they "harassed me into leaving" when I decided to stop posting on this site? Will they mald and seethe over me for eternity? I want to remove the threads and move on from this site, but if I do that my haters will lose the most important person in their lives, not that this is who I've ever wanted to be. So my haters want me to have a reason to come back to this site and check if the threads are still gone and if not, why. But I already know why the threads will likely be up forever. It's spite, and I don't believe anyone who wanted to help me delete those threads would be allowed to do so by my haters.
I've been posting on this site seeking validation and community because I was insecure and stupid. I've been oversharing personal information because I am overly trusting and severely autistic and stupid. I've been using this site because I wanted to prove the haters wrong, but I've realized this is futile because the haters aren't seeing things clearly. My stupidity and naivete caused me to trust strangers on the internet too much. Do others really deserve to suffer because of that? Innocent people, some with families? Is that how far my haters are willing to go just to spite me?
I don't mock people for how they talk.
I wish to delete my threads to protect people from potential internet harassment.
>"It's okay for us to refuse to let you protect people because we don't think they're real and you're not putting in the effort to tell us which specific posts you want gone and then create arguments that can convince even us why they must go"
These are post-hoc excuses for refusing to let me protect people who might exist. I see no reason why I should accept a compromise between the reasonable thing I want and the unreasonable position of those standing in the way of that specifically, as was openly stated, to spite me.
Deleting the threads would save a lot more time than combing through them for the worst posts. I'm just one person. I don't have the time for that but enemies of whites do. And how do I know any argument I make for deleting objectionable posts will be taken seriously, when my argument for deleting objectionable threads has been "This will protect people" and the response was "No way bro you just want to protect yourself and delete embarassing posts"? Any hints towards people in my life, even the smallest, could be used to narrow down possibilities when it comes to who I am or who others are. You've seen how people on the internet and those connected to them get harassed. I want to protect people.
When I am given valuable critique I listen, as evidenced in the pony fanfictions thread where I saw valuable writing advice amongst "Your character sucks gay sailor dicks lmao". Glim isn't a hater. Sven isn't a hater. Haters want to see me improve at things instead of resenting me for being bad at them. Haters feel justified in attacking people because it makes them feel superior and I've seen their type on countless sites that forgot their purpose. The /RWSS/ thread and other constructive threads like it that could actually hurt real leftists or help real whites or some mix of the two will never be as active as threads where all you have to say is "Here's another war crime the left did to us" or "Grr I can't believe that happened" or "Here is another political cartoon" or "Here is another cartoon I want to fuck". Haters hate and then contrive excuses why afterwards even if their behaviour (stalking me across the site, derailing threads to lie about me, gaslighting others about events that occured in threads still on the site) is more reprehensible than anything I've ever said or done. I'm an easy target for bullying because I believe in the good within people. "Fuck you nigel everything you do is wrong because you're the one doing it and you're always like this and you're never good and you're always bad and I feel nothing but hatred towards you" isn't valuable advice, it is just noise. I know it's just noise because I've listened to them. But they won't feel listened to until they feel catharsis. But didn't announcing my desire to leave give them that catharsis? Didn't they feel like they "harassed me into leaving" when I decided to stop posting on this site? Will they mald and seethe over me for eternity? I want to remove the threads and move on from this site, but if I do that my haters will lose the most important person in their lives, not that this is who I've ever wanted to be. So my haters want me to have a reason to come back to this site and check if the threads are still gone and if not, why. But I already know why the threads will likely be up forever. It's spite, and I don't believe anyone who wanted to help me delete those threads would be allowed to do so by my haters.
I've been posting on this site seeking validation and community because I was insecure and stupid. I've been oversharing personal information because I am overly trusting and severely autistic and stupid. I've been using this site because I wanted to prove the haters wrong, but I've realized this is futile because the haters aren't seeing things clearly. My stupidity and naivete caused me to trust strangers on the internet too much. Do others really deserve to suffer because of that? Innocent people, some with families? Is that how far my haters are willing to go just to spite me?
File (): EFB4F5D3DFE4EDF9790E20BA5D697333-644815.png (629.7 KB, 779x548, Screenshot 2023-04-17 002048.png)
>>7734
This is the last time I'm going to bother replying to you. Nobody here is obligated to do anything for you, and you've burned through any goodwill we might have been naturally inclined to extend. If you are so densely autistic that you really can't see how these long, incoherent screeds of yours just make you come across as even more obnoxious than everyone on this site already considers you, then at this point I just have no idea what to say. Keep on screaming your anger into the void I guess; it's not like you've proven yourself capable of doing much else.
>These are post-hoc excuses for refusing to let me protect people who might exist. I see no reason why I should accept a compromise between the reasonable thing I want and the unreasonable position of those standing in the way of that specifically, as was openly stated, to spite me.
You can choose to believe whatever you want, just as you can choose to keep on behaving like an absolute ass the way you have for the past five years, instead of just learning to communicate like a normal human being. However, I will once again point out to you that you are not in any position to make demands of staff or the /mlpol/ community at large. There is no rule on this site stating that staff are obligated to delete your posts just because you regret posting them (three years after the fact no less) and want them deleted. The threads in question total roughly 1300 posts in all, the majority of them yours, and you made a conscious choice to make every single one of those posts. You chose to post on this site about your personal life, just as you now choose to keep on shrieking and throwing tantrums like a baby instead of just doing the simple thing we asked you to do. We owe you nothing. Don't like it? Tough shit; keep throwing tantrums and see how far it gets you.
>Deleting the threads would save a lot more time than combing through them for the worst posts. I'm just one person. I don't have the time for that but enemies of whites do.
You had time to write all of that garbage. If even you don't have the time to comb through it, why would you expect us to? In fact, why even post it in the first place? Also, who are these "enemies of whites" anyway? Do you count these people among the "haters," or are they a separate group entirely? You keep crying about so many different types of imaginary enemies haunting you that it's hard to keep track of them all. Are they in the room with us right now?
>The /RWSS/ thread and other constructive threads like it that could actually hurt real leftists or help real whites or some mix of the two will never be as active as threads where all you have to say is "Here's another war crime the left did to us" or "Grr I can't believe that happened" or "Here is another political cartoon" or "Here is another cartoon I want to fuck".
You just can't resist peppering your posts with shit that has nothing to do with anything you're allegedly talking about, can you? You are your own worst enemy, Nigel. I hope that one day you come to realize that, though I won't be holding my breath.
>When I am given valuable critique I listen
>I'm an easy target for bullying because I believe in the good within people.
> I've been using this site because I wanted to prove the haters wrong, but I've realized this is futile because the haters aren't seeing things clearly.
The sad thing is I don't think you're trying to gaslight anyone here, I think this is what you actually believe.
Anyway, whatever; I'll say it again: if there are posts in your ridiculous blog threads that contain personal info about people, find them and report them and we'll take a look. Otherwise, you can just keep on throwing tantrums and screaming into the void about how nothing is your fault and everyone is just being mean to you. Either way, this the last (You) you're going to get from me.
This is the last time I'm going to bother replying to you. Nobody here is obligated to do anything for you, and you've burned through any goodwill we might have been naturally inclined to extend. If you are so densely autistic that you really can't see how these long, incoherent screeds of yours just make you come across as even more obnoxious than everyone on this site already considers you, then at this point I just have no idea what to say. Keep on screaming your anger into the void I guess; it's not like you've proven yourself capable of doing much else.
>These are post-hoc excuses for refusing to let me protect people who might exist. I see no reason why I should accept a compromise between the reasonable thing I want and the unreasonable position of those standing in the way of that specifically, as was openly stated, to spite me.
You can choose to believe whatever you want, just as you can choose to keep on behaving like an absolute ass the way you have for the past five years, instead of just learning to communicate like a normal human being. However, I will once again point out to you that you are not in any position to make demands of staff or the /mlpol/ community at large. There is no rule on this site stating that staff are obligated to delete your posts just because you regret posting them (three years after the fact no less) and want them deleted. The threads in question total roughly 1300 posts in all, the majority of them yours, and you made a conscious choice to make every single one of those posts. You chose to post on this site about your personal life, just as you now choose to keep on shrieking and throwing tantrums like a baby instead of just doing the simple thing we asked you to do. We owe you nothing. Don't like it? Tough shit; keep throwing tantrums and see how far it gets you.
>Deleting the threads would save a lot more time than combing through them for the worst posts. I'm just one person. I don't have the time for that but enemies of whites do.
You had time to write all of that garbage. If even you don't have the time to comb through it, why would you expect us to? In fact, why even post it in the first place? Also, who are these "enemies of whites" anyway? Do you count these people among the "haters," or are they a separate group entirely? You keep crying about so many different types of imaginary enemies haunting you that it's hard to keep track of them all. Are they in the room with us right now?
>The /RWSS/ thread and other constructive threads like it that could actually hurt real leftists or help real whites or some mix of the two will never be as active as threads where all you have to say is "Here's another war crime the left did to us" or "Grr I can't believe that happened" or "Here is another political cartoon" or "Here is another cartoon I want to fuck".
You just can't resist peppering your posts with shit that has nothing to do with anything you're allegedly talking about, can you? You are your own worst enemy, Nigel. I hope that one day you come to realize that, though I won't be holding my breath.
>When I am given valuable critique I listen
>I'm an easy target for bullying because I believe in the good within people.
> I've been using this site because I wanted to prove the haters wrong, but I've realized this is futile because the haters aren't seeing things clearly.
The sad thing is I don't think you're trying to gaslight anyone here, I think this is what you actually believe.
Anyway, whatever; I'll say it again: if there are posts in your ridiculous blog threads that contain personal info about people, find them and report them and we'll take a look. Otherwise, you can just keep on throwing tantrums and screaming into the void about how nothing is your fault and everyone is just being mean to you. Either way, this the last (You) you're going to get from me.
File (): AD08D5D7FD773B5F008CEB770D47B37D-162097.jpg (158.3 KB, 1920x800, so far.jpeg)
>>7736
>this the last (You) you're going to get from me.
Not Nigel, but... perhaps... who knows... may be...
>this the last (You) you're going to get from me.
Not Nigel, but... perhaps... who knows... may be...
Anonymous
No.7739
File (): DF660A7CD1365502AA967591540E02F4-135854.jpg (132.7 KB, 1058x705, 0D00C4D7-839E-4171-A0F9-E07D8CFD33D2.jpeg)
Anonymous
No.7743
>>7733
She's Hu Tao from genshin impact - Chinese Gacha Shit.
She's known for using orthodox marketing strats for her funeral parlor. 2 for 1 discounts, special memberships for institutions with high mortality rate. Asking people how their health is doing. That sort of thing.
She's Hu Tao from genshin impact - Chinese Gacha Shit.
She's known for using orthodox marketing strats for her funeral parlor. 2 for 1 discounts, special memberships for institutions with high mortality rate. Asking people how their health is doing. That sort of thing.
File (): 18ED40D15BB6015DD373729DBF94699C-65174.jpg (63.6 KB, 333x333, EC8A8F0A-342C-449A-AD90-89E17D5878AE.jpeg)
>>>7734
>refusing to let me protect people who might exist
Nigel, If you had any desire to protect these (probably non-existent) people, you wouldn’t have posted their personally identifiable information in the first place. You’re telling us that you basically doxxed these people by posting too much identifying information about them. And Nigel, it’s not about us “letting” you do anything. You have no power to do anything except report threads. You are asking us in staff to do something.
>I see no reason why I should accept a compromise
You have no power to “accept” or reject anything. You want us to delete posts. We in staff are the only people with the power to delete posts. You either persuade us to use our power, or you don’t. There is no “accepting” a compromise. There is only us deleting, or not deleting.
>the reasonable thing I want and the unreasonable position of those standing in the way of that specifically, as was openly stated, to spite me
Your position is unreasonable. You want us to delete 1300 posts made over the last 3 years by multiple people, for the purpose of removing posts because of an unspecified possibility that something in there might need to be deleted. This is like leveling an entire apartment block to kill a few possible unseen spiders. Those posts don’t belong to you anymore. When you post something in the public sphere, and then continue to post and affirm those posts, and then other people engage with that, you give up your right to claim those posts as your own. Those belong to the internet now. They belong to wider culture. They belong to /mlpol/. And many of the posts you want us to delete were not even made by you, they were made by other people. You never had a right to claim those posts and we, as staff, have no right to delete them.
Maybe Elway or others in this thread think those posts have no value. Maybe someone else has spite. I don’t have spite, and I don’ t care what they say has value. I don’t think it’s my place to decide what, in the wider internet, has value and what doesn’t
>Deoetung the threads would save a lot more time than combing through them for the worst posts.
We’re not going to comb them
>I’m just one person. I don’t have the time for that
You are the one who wants them deleted. You are the one who (allegedly) posted the private information of other people. The burden is on you to show what needs to be deleted. And yes you do have that time. You had the time to write it.
>And how do I know any argument I make for deleting objectionable posts will be taken seriously
Elway misspoke, or you misunderstood him. You do not have to argue why it should be deleted. You don’t have to argue why, you just have to point out what and where it is. Just in the report write “information on the second sentence of paragraph 3” so we know where it is. You don’t have to give a reason, just say what and where it is.
>enemies of whites do.
The enemies of whites don’t care about you. If they did, they would have found this information you’re talking about in the 1-3 years since you posted their information here.
>Any hints towards people in my life, even the smallest, could be used to narrow down possibilities when it comes to who I am or who others are.
This sentence, along with your statement that you “don’t have time to comb the threads,” strongly implies to me that when you asked for us to delete things, you did not have instances of posting other people’s information in mind, which supports my idea that that isn’t the reason you wanted and still want the threads deleted, but is just a cover story.
I personally think you are too self obsessed to have ever posted identifying information about other people.
>When I am given valuable critique I listen
Then listen to this: your biggest problem is that you want to make yourself the subject of every discussion, or else, to turn every discussion into a discussion about some subject you are more interested in, rather than engage in discussion of the topic.
> I want to remove the threads and move on from this site
The purpose of moderation is to serve the users of this site. If you are “moving on” from this site, why should we care what you want? People who use this site may derive value from posts in those threads written by other people, or maybe even from posts written by you. We are not going to delete large threads because someone who does not use this site wants us to. If we did, we’d have to delete the entire site.
>My haters will lose the most important person in their lives
Nigel, this is the self-obsession thing. No one except yourself sees you as the most important thing in their lives.
>But I already know why the threads will likely be up forever. It’s because of spire
No, it’s because I’m not going to delete a large number of posts by many people just to please someone who has promised to stop using the site. If we did that for everyone, we’d have to delete the entire site.
>Do others really deserve to suffer because of that? Innocent people, some with families?
Are you telling us that you posted the personal information of many people with families on this site? Are you really that reckless?
As stated so many times before, just report the posts, and we’ll delete them.
>refusing to let me protect people who might exist
Nigel, If you had any desire to protect these (probably non-existent) people, you wouldn’t have posted their personally identifiable information in the first place. You’re telling us that you basically doxxed these people by posting too much identifying information about them. And Nigel, it’s not about us “letting” you do anything. You have no power to do anything except report threads. You are asking us in staff to do something.
>I see no reason why I should accept a compromise
You have no power to “accept” or reject anything. You want us to delete posts. We in staff are the only people with the power to delete posts. You either persuade us to use our power, or you don’t. There is no “accepting” a compromise. There is only us deleting, or not deleting.
>the reasonable thing I want and the unreasonable position of those standing in the way of that specifically, as was openly stated, to spite me
Your position is unreasonable. You want us to delete 1300 posts made over the last 3 years by multiple people, for the purpose of removing posts because of an unspecified possibility that something in there might need to be deleted. This is like leveling an entire apartment block to kill a few possible unseen spiders. Those posts don’t belong to you anymore. When you post something in the public sphere, and then continue to post and affirm those posts, and then other people engage with that, you give up your right to claim those posts as your own. Those belong to the internet now. They belong to wider culture. They belong to /mlpol/. And many of the posts you want us to delete were not even made by you, they were made by other people. You never had a right to claim those posts and we, as staff, have no right to delete them.
Maybe Elway or others in this thread think those posts have no value. Maybe someone else has spite. I don’t have spite, and I don’ t care what they say has value. I don’t think it’s my place to decide what, in the wider internet, has value and what doesn’t
>Deoetung the threads would save a lot more time than combing through them for the worst posts.
We’re not going to comb them
>I’m just one person. I don’t have the time for that
You are the one who wants them deleted. You are the one who (allegedly) posted the private information of other people. The burden is on you to show what needs to be deleted. And yes you do have that time. You had the time to write it.
>And how do I know any argument I make for deleting objectionable posts will be taken seriously
Elway misspoke, or you misunderstood him. You do not have to argue why it should be deleted. You don’t have to argue why, you just have to point out what and where it is. Just in the report write “information on the second sentence of paragraph 3” so we know where it is. You don’t have to give a reason, just say what and where it is.
>enemies of whites do.
The enemies of whites don’t care about you. If they did, they would have found this information you’re talking about in the 1-3 years since you posted their information here.
>Any hints towards people in my life, even the smallest, could be used to narrow down possibilities when it comes to who I am or who others are.
This sentence, along with your statement that you “don’t have time to comb the threads,” strongly implies to me that when you asked for us to delete things, you did not have instances of posting other people’s information in mind, which supports my idea that that isn’t the reason you wanted and still want the threads deleted, but is just a cover story.
I personally think you are too self obsessed to have ever posted identifying information about other people.
>When I am given valuable critique I listen
Then listen to this: your biggest problem is that you want to make yourself the subject of every discussion, or else, to turn every discussion into a discussion about some subject you are more interested in, rather than engage in discussion of the topic.
> I want to remove the threads and move on from this site
The purpose of moderation is to serve the users of this site. If you are “moving on” from this site, why should we care what you want? People who use this site may derive value from posts in those threads written by other people, or maybe even from posts written by you. We are not going to delete large threads because someone who does not use this site wants us to. If we did, we’d have to delete the entire site.
>My haters will lose the most important person in their lives
Nigel, this is the self-obsession thing. No one except yourself sees you as the most important thing in their lives.
>But I already know why the threads will likely be up forever. It’s because of spire
No, it’s because I’m not going to delete a large number of posts by many people just to please someone who has promised to stop using the site. If we did that for everyone, we’d have to delete the entire site.
>Do others really deserve to suffer because of that? Innocent people, some with families?
Are you telling us that you posted the personal information of many people with families on this site? Are you really that reckless?
As stated so many times before, just report the posts, and we’ll delete them.
>>7734
You know, you could just rule #10 those threads to bump limit, and then make a bunch of other threads to slide the old ones into the archive.
You know, you could just rule #10 those threads to bump limit, and then make a bunch of other threads to slide the old ones into the archive.
Business Dog
No.7747
File (): EFD28EDCA9A5DA01302A654E97B7F2FF-674264.gif (658.5 KB, 384x216, Sweet_Juicy_Drama.gif)
Epic drama... so juicy. Just like the good old days. :3 Now I actually almost-care what was posted and "absolutely MUST" be removed.
Anonymous
No.7749
File (): 99DD4EE53179D33A143523E75EB4E040-518763.gif (506.6 KB, 725x657, 1531910.gif)
It's gonna be really funny when Nigel never leaves.
File (): 5C769A002422C37FD57F313102B3DDC6-274454.jpg (268.0 KB, 709x762, EWNnMs0WAAAJU8s.jpg)
How many people alive are obsessed with something incredibly specific? If I spoke about going to a party and talking to someone obsessed with Girahim, that's a hint that someone like that is in my life or was once in my life. From there sufficiently dedicated seething nolifers could investigate everyone connected to me on every site I use and guess which person it is. If that user posted her face all over twitter and facebook that's her doxed, and it also narrows down the list of places I might live in. Even if it only leads to her online identity, not her offline one, because she knows how to keep those separate, I don't want her to be harassed online by obsessed delusional histrionic narcissists just for her proximity to me. I don't want spiteful assholes to harass or dox her just to piss me off, or to keep information on the internet that could result in her being harassed or doxed just to piss me off.
I don't want people harassing her for literal years over pony opinions or for pissing narcissists off about five years ago and getting away with it, and I don't want these narcissists backtracking when called out and pretending it's all "just criticism for sucking at stuff and never listening to helpful advice" like cowards. Though I wouldn't care if they said anyone who points out their inconsistent logic is crying and malding, because I don't care what haters think of me. I don't trust my ability to find absolutely everything in those threads that could be used against myself and others. Anything I or others overlook in those threads could hurt innocent people, so letting me delete my threads and everything in them is the safest approach. Even though it means anyone who hates me could lie about what was there. This is a website for content illegal in most countries: anti-woke political talk. I'm trying to improve my OpSec and address a security risk.
I thought about taking a break from the site and I thought about leaving it entirely. But I think I would like to leave this site with a clear conscience knowing I'm not leaving behind anything that can hurt the innocent people in my life that have nothing to do with this website. I know my haters want me to feel bad about how much I've upset them by existing, and I hope they realize some day how silly that is. They just wanted me gone, and then they contrive excuses why, despite ignoring this behaviour or worse in themselves or others, and now that I'm saying I want to leave and asking to have my threads removed my haters changed their tune to whatever lets them feel like they're the protagonists of this story and I'm the villain. I know I have no bargaining power to force others to do the right thing and protect innocent whites from potential harm. Not just from sufficiently bored internet trolls, but from woke freaks who might harass them too.
I want to correct a mistake and narcissists are smugly standing in the way of that by choice and saying "Just compromise with me and I'll totally keep my word" as if we're not all familiar with that trick and how it leads to the next compromise "I will only delete some of the posts you point out". Are the threads I created on this site really valued by anyone on this site so much, anyone would want as few posts from them gone as possible? Why wouldn't anyone want them gone entirely? How am I supposed to take anyone who says they hate me for my threads seriously if they also don't want my threads gone? I'm probably upsetting people by telling them I want to leave and get rid of those threads, because they don't want to see me go. Sorry if I'm burning bridges by wanting to protect innocent people I care about. There are two people on this site I care about and respect and I'm not one of them. But protecting innocents is more important to me than anyone's feelings, even if it would probably be smarter for me to pretend I don't care about anything.
When I found my sense of self-worth I lost my reason to post here seeking validation and a sense of community. If I ever took breaks from working on my games and finished a pony fanfic I might have a reason to come back here and ask for writing feedback in the review thread, but I'll understand if people wouldn't want me to do that. If my threads are deleted I will have no reason to post on this site asking for them to be gone, and then I will have no reason at all to post on this site and my haters will have to find a new scapegoat to blame for all the site's problems. But as long as they don't bother me or anyone I care about, I won't care about them, which means they lose unless they can find someone else they hate more. So I can understand why somebody would bow to the pressure exerted by my haters and try to do everything they can to stop me from leaving. Truly hating someone to the point that it becomes your personality and becomes more important to you than any other idea or virtue is just as much of a parasocial relationship as stanning someone. On one of the few websites where Jeffery Epstein and Keffals and George Soros can be talked about openly, did I really become the most detested user here? It's a common leftist trick to assume the worst in someone and refuse to budge from this assumption, but I see no reason to assume I only want these threads gone to protect my reputation. What reputation can I possibly have worth protecting? If I was afraid of people knowing I used to write shit pony fanfiction when I was a teenager I'd want threads and posts about those wiped from the site, but I don't. I'm not asking for the posts I made where I expressed my controversial libertarian ideals to be removed either. I don't care if people on other sites find out I hate slavery, taxes, debt, inflation, the kalergi plan, and corrupt governments.
This isn't about me. This is about justice.
If I went for a week, or even a month without posting on this site, would that prove to people I am serious about wanting to move on, and convince them to delete the threads?
I don't want people harassing her for literal years over pony opinions or for pissing narcissists off about five years ago and getting away with it, and I don't want these narcissists backtracking when called out and pretending it's all "just criticism for sucking at stuff and never listening to helpful advice" like cowards. Though I wouldn't care if they said anyone who points out their inconsistent logic is crying and malding, because I don't care what haters think of me. I don't trust my ability to find absolutely everything in those threads that could be used against myself and others. Anything I or others overlook in those threads could hurt innocent people, so letting me delete my threads and everything in them is the safest approach. Even though it means anyone who hates me could lie about what was there. This is a website for content illegal in most countries: anti-woke political talk. I'm trying to improve my OpSec and address a security risk.
I thought about taking a break from the site and I thought about leaving it entirely. But I think I would like to leave this site with a clear conscience knowing I'm not leaving behind anything that can hurt the innocent people in my life that have nothing to do with this website. I know my haters want me to feel bad about how much I've upset them by existing, and I hope they realize some day how silly that is. They just wanted me gone, and then they contrive excuses why, despite ignoring this behaviour or worse in themselves or others, and now that I'm saying I want to leave and asking to have my threads removed my haters changed their tune to whatever lets them feel like they're the protagonists of this story and I'm the villain. I know I have no bargaining power to force others to do the right thing and protect innocent whites from potential harm. Not just from sufficiently bored internet trolls, but from woke freaks who might harass them too.
I want to correct a mistake and narcissists are smugly standing in the way of that by choice and saying "Just compromise with me and I'll totally keep my word" as if we're not all familiar with that trick and how it leads to the next compromise "I will only delete some of the posts you point out". Are the threads I created on this site really valued by anyone on this site so much, anyone would want as few posts from them gone as possible? Why wouldn't anyone want them gone entirely? How am I supposed to take anyone who says they hate me for my threads seriously if they also don't want my threads gone? I'm probably upsetting people by telling them I want to leave and get rid of those threads, because they don't want to see me go. Sorry if I'm burning bridges by wanting to protect innocent people I care about. There are two people on this site I care about and respect and I'm not one of them. But protecting innocents is more important to me than anyone's feelings, even if it would probably be smarter for me to pretend I don't care about anything.
When I found my sense of self-worth I lost my reason to post here seeking validation and a sense of community. If I ever took breaks from working on my games and finished a pony fanfic I might have a reason to come back here and ask for writing feedback in the review thread, but I'll understand if people wouldn't want me to do that. If my threads are deleted I will have no reason to post on this site asking for them to be gone, and then I will have no reason at all to post on this site and my haters will have to find a new scapegoat to blame for all the site's problems. But as long as they don't bother me or anyone I care about, I won't care about them, which means they lose unless they can find someone else they hate more. So I can understand why somebody would bow to the pressure exerted by my haters and try to do everything they can to stop me from leaving. Truly hating someone to the point that it becomes your personality and becomes more important to you than any other idea or virtue is just as much of a parasocial relationship as stanning someone. On one of the few websites where Jeffery Epstein and Keffals and George Soros can be talked about openly, did I really become the most detested user here? It's a common leftist trick to assume the worst in someone and refuse to budge from this assumption, but I see no reason to assume I only want these threads gone to protect my reputation. What reputation can I possibly have worth protecting? If I was afraid of people knowing I used to write shit pony fanfiction when I was a teenager I'd want threads and posts about those wiped from the site, but I don't. I'm not asking for the posts I made where I expressed my controversial libertarian ideals to be removed either. I don't care if people on other sites find out I hate slavery, taxes, debt, inflation, the kalergi plan, and corrupt governments.
This isn't about me. This is about justice.
If I went for a week, or even a month without posting on this site, would that prove to people I am serious about wanting to move on, and convince them to delete the threads?
Anonymous
No.7754
File (): E600E3293A779D503E41ED144CB74FD8-824780.gif (805.4 KB, 522x291, 7A61E7A3-F139-4FFE-A23F-C3BBC4F89C02.gif)
File (): 1029720829401AD79C5270F1EAFC9F2E-759595.gif (741.8 KB, 500x400, 2071327.gif)
>>7752
Post a video of yourself doing the chicken dance to the tune of Johnny Rebel's Coon Town and I'll see to it that your threads are deleted. You can wear a mask, but you must dance for me, monkey.
Post a video of yourself doing the chicken dance to the tune of Johnny Rebel's Coon Town and I'll see to it that your threads are deleted. You can wear a mask, but you must dance for me, monkey.
>>7752
>If I went for a week, or even a month without posting on this site, would that prove to people I am serious about wanting to move on, and convince them to delete the threads?
No.
>If I went for a week, or even a month without posting on this site, would that prove to people I am serious about wanting to move on, and convince them to delete the threads?
No.
File (): 0B52C74C8D32AD29D734FC0E307B2BAF-25601.jpg (25.0 KB, 556x406, 5ec094b40db9d8a8c680aed8e86dfdeb.jpg)
>>7752
Dang it, almost made it a full 24 hours. Alright, since there's technically some new information buried in this latest pile of word-vomit, I'll go ahead and toss you just one last (You).
>If I spoke about going to a party and talking to someone obsessed with Girahim, that's a hint that someone like that is in my life or was once in my life. From there sufficiently dedicated seething nolifers could investigate everyone connected to me on every site I use and guess which person it is. If that user posted her face all over twitter and facebook that's her doxed, and it also narrows down the list of places I might live in. Even if it only leads to her online identity, not her offline one, because she knows how to keep those separate, I don't want her to be harassed online by obsessed delusional histrionic narcissists just for her proximity to me. I don't want spiteful assholes to harass or dox her just to piss me off, or to keep information on the internet that could result in her being harassed or doxed just to piss me off.
I have no idea who or what a Girahim is; for the sake of my own mental health I'm just going to assume it's probably some kind of Pokemon and keep going.
In any case, what you're talking about here is completely speculative. If you wanted us to delete specific posts containing identifying information about real people (names, screen names, geographic locations, etc) that would be one thing. What seems to be worrying you is that some theoretical person, who is theoretically willing to spend untold hours sifting through all of your autism, might theoretically find these threads one day, and theoretically piece together enough info from the clues you've dropped to theoretically locate and harass people you're theoretically close to. This is not even close to being a valid justification for deleting four complete threads from the board.
Chances are pretty slim that anyone is going to find out where your "girlfriend" lives just because you mentioned on the board that she likes Gargamel, or Garderobe, or whatever the fuck you said. Even if you've volunteered enough raw data about yourself over the years that someone could hypothetically find you if they wanted to, nobody is likely to expend the effort unless you give them a reason. That's really the key takeaway here. In other words, if you don't want to be treated like a Chris-chan-tier lolcow, the best thing you can do for yourself is to stop behaving like one.
Here is a short self-help video that might shed some light on your problem:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9n0Ays4vZ2Q
I understand that you are still laboring under the delusion that your behavior on this site has been exemplary, that you have done no wrong, and that you are simply the victim of an elaborate bullying campaign enacted by "haters" who are "obsessed" with you. Experience has taught me that it's a waste of time trying to convince you otherwise, and yet I still feel compelled to give it one last try:
>I want to correct a mistake and narcissists are smugly standing in the way of that by choice and saying "Just compromise with me and I'll totally keep my word" as if we're not all familiar with that trick and how it leads to the next compromise "I will only delete some of the posts you point out". Are the threads I created on this site really valued by anyone on this site so much, anyone would want as few posts from them gone as possible? Why wouldn't anyone want them gone entirely? How am I supposed to take anyone who says they hate me for my threads seriously if they also don't want my threads gone? I'm probably upsetting people by telling them I want to leave and get rid of those threads, because they don't want to see me go. Sorry if I'm burning bridges by wanting to protect innocent people I care about. There are two people on this site I care about and respect and I'm not one of them. But protecting innocents is more important to me than anyone's feelings, even if it would probably be smarter for me to pretend I don't care about anything.
Give this paragraph you wrote a thorough read, and see if you can figure out why nobody here seems to feel much sympathy for you.
Anyway, from a staff perspective, I think it's safe to say that we've addressed your concerns and this matter is now closed. If you would like to continue using this thread to very publicly make a fool of yourself, thus attracting even more negative attention and increasing the odds that the hater-detectives will try to track your lady-friend down, I won't try to stop you. However, my advice would be to just cut your losses and let it go.
Dang it, almost made it a full 24 hours. Alright, since there's technically some new information buried in this latest pile of word-vomit, I'll go ahead and toss you just one last (You).
>If I spoke about going to a party and talking to someone obsessed with Girahim, that's a hint that someone like that is in my life or was once in my life. From there sufficiently dedicated seething nolifers could investigate everyone connected to me on every site I use and guess which person it is. If that user posted her face all over twitter and facebook that's her doxed, and it also narrows down the list of places I might live in. Even if it only leads to her online identity, not her offline one, because she knows how to keep those separate, I don't want her to be harassed online by obsessed delusional histrionic narcissists just for her proximity to me. I don't want spiteful assholes to harass or dox her just to piss me off, or to keep information on the internet that could result in her being harassed or doxed just to piss me off.
I have no idea who or what a Girahim is; for the sake of my own mental health I'm just going to assume it's probably some kind of Pokemon and keep going.
In any case, what you're talking about here is completely speculative. If you wanted us to delete specific posts containing identifying information about real people (names, screen names, geographic locations, etc) that would be one thing. What seems to be worrying you is that some theoretical person, who is theoretically willing to spend untold hours sifting through all of your autism, might theoretically find these threads one day, and theoretically piece together enough info from the clues you've dropped to theoretically locate and harass people you're theoretically close to. This is not even close to being a valid justification for deleting four complete threads from the board.
Chances are pretty slim that anyone is going to find out where your "girlfriend" lives just because you mentioned on the board that she likes Gargamel, or Garderobe, or whatever the fuck you said. Even if you've volunteered enough raw data about yourself over the years that someone could hypothetically find you if they wanted to, nobody is likely to expend the effort unless you give them a reason. That's really the key takeaway here. In other words, if you don't want to be treated like a Chris-chan-tier lolcow, the best thing you can do for yourself is to stop behaving like one.
Here is a short self-help video that might shed some light on your problem:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9n0Ays4vZ2Q
I understand that you are still laboring under the delusion that your behavior on this site has been exemplary, that you have done no wrong, and that you are simply the victim of an elaborate bullying campaign enacted by "haters" who are "obsessed" with you. Experience has taught me that it's a waste of time trying to convince you otherwise, and yet I still feel compelled to give it one last try:
>I want to correct a mistake and narcissists are smugly standing in the way of that by choice and saying "Just compromise with me and I'll totally keep my word" as if we're not all familiar with that trick and how it leads to the next compromise "I will only delete some of the posts you point out". Are the threads I created on this site really valued by anyone on this site so much, anyone would want as few posts from them gone as possible? Why wouldn't anyone want them gone entirely? How am I supposed to take anyone who says they hate me for my threads seriously if they also don't want my threads gone? I'm probably upsetting people by telling them I want to leave and get rid of those threads, because they don't want to see me go. Sorry if I'm burning bridges by wanting to protect innocent people I care about. There are two people on this site I care about and respect and I'm not one of them. But protecting innocents is more important to me than anyone's feelings, even if it would probably be smarter for me to pretend I don't care about anything.
Give this paragraph you wrote a thorough read, and see if you can figure out why nobody here seems to feel much sympathy for you.
Anyway, from a staff perspective, I think it's safe to say that we've addressed your concerns and this matter is now closed. If you would like to continue using this thread to very publicly make a fool of yourself, thus attracting even more negative attention and increasing the odds that the hater-detectives will try to track your lady-friend down, I won't try to stop you. However, my advice would be to just cut your losses and let it go.