Pls reopen it, given time wasn't really enough. Maybe open it until it hits the bump limit or there will be nothing to ask and say?
Pic related is my reaction to admin closing the thread.
/qa/ - Questions and Answers
Keeping the community together by giving you a voice
Archived thread
File (): 1882B8AF73A3F9CDDB4128255804A9B8-106384.png (103.9 KB, 500x500, 13900de9b2d2ef980fdbb3139f4f79d12ac238458dcecd40df9e07c5603b6fdd.png)
>>3654
It was closed because rule breaking and intentional trolling had begun to occur, but we can reopen it.
Users should be advised we intend to enforce the rules.
It was closed because rule breaking and intentional trolling had begun to occur, but we can reopen it.
Users should be advised we intend to enforce the rules.
>>3656
Which rules where breakers exactly?
I did not see race mixing, cuck, shilling nor cp, just general shitposting.
Which rules where breakers exactly?
I did not see race mixing, cuck, shilling nor cp, just general shitposting.
>>3657
Read the OP of that thread. It was intentional baiting by means of posting the name "Nigel." Banned for the same reason as blacked threads and Thrackerzod - it's intentional baiting that just disrupts all good discussion and makes the experience unpleasant for everyone,
Read the OP of that thread. It was intentional baiting by means of posting the name "Nigel." Banned for the same reason as blacked threads and Thrackerzod - it's intentional baiting that just disrupts all good discussion and makes the experience unpleasant for everyone,
Anonymous
No.3659
>>3658
Everyone, but select few who got accustomed and learned how to enjoy these kinds of things. But yeah, it must suck for everyone new, because not everyday they'll encounter someone like ""Nigel"".
Everyone, but select few who got accustomed and learned how to enjoy these kinds of things. But yeah, it must suck for everyone new, because not everyday they'll encounter someone like ""Nigel"".
Anonymous
No.3660
>>3658
It's good to just shut off a thread because it doesn't have the minimum quality standards, thats the right thing to do, but that is not rule violation.
I say it would be better to just shoo it to a shitposting board.
Or we could send bad users to pink board.
It's good to just shut off a thread because it doesn't have the minimum quality standards, thats the right thing to do, but that is not rule violation.
I say it would be better to just shoo it to a shitposting board.
Or we could send bad users to pink board.
Anonymous
No.3676
Thread got closed again, so I'll just dump whatever I wanted to post. Thanks again! You could've waited for 30 more minutes before doing that!
>>88621
Yeah, move the thread somewhere. This is shitposting now. My bad! And all I wanted is to reply to some posts and ask/comment about/on >>87975
>>88628
Yeah, right. How about those proofs? Actually, define respectful. And define it in every single detail. Go full autism on this.
>>88621
Yeah, move the thread somewhere. This is shitposting now. My bad! And all I wanted is to reply to some posts and ask/comment about/on >>87975
>>88628
Yeah, right. How about those proofs? Actually, define respectful. And define it in every single detail. Go full autism on this.
Also, there's this
>>88632
Then I believe it's time to sacrifice something. That is, stop trying to satisfy everyone, people will continue complaining regardless.
>>88632
Then I believe it's time to sacrifice something. That is, stop trying to satisfy everyone, people will continue complaining regardless.
>>3679
yeah, satisfying no one was fair simply because of that. Still, would be good to actually have a shitposting board, where there's actually no limitations(minus the cucknada laws) as to what one can shitpost about. /sp/ is clearly not that board.
yeah, satisfying no one was fair simply because of that. Still, would be good to actually have a shitposting board, where there's actually no limitations(minus the cucknada laws) as to what one can shitpost about. /sp/ is clearly not that board.
File (): E86A24E3208443D5E69B244F24542588-4331.png (4.2 KB, 225x225, images.png)
Why not make a dump board like /trash/ Were shit and off topic threads are send to?
>>3680
You can't really get an idea how much satisfied people are in that thread. It seemed like a lot of them just wanted to argue, and that carried over into different threads. You could tell because the first parties were satisfied, including Nigel, while some others came into the thread completely new to the subject at hand & began making "odd points." More changes or dismissing the ruling by drawing extremes. The mistake was re-opening the thread.
You can't really get an idea how much satisfied people are in that thread. It seemed like a lot of them just wanted to argue, and that carried over into different threads. You could tell because the first parties were satisfied, including Nigel, while some others came into the thread completely new to the subject at hand & began making "odd points." More changes or dismissing the ruling by drawing extremes. The mistake was re-opening the thread.
>>3683
Yeah, that lead to nothing. Results are the same. Basically no resolution, minus less fun is allowed now, which is not good at all. Maybe /sp/ option was the actual best one?
Yeah, that lead to nothing. Results are the same. Basically no resolution, minus less fun is allowed now, which is not good at all. Maybe /sp/ option was the actual best one?
Anonymous
No.3685
>>3684
I was aware that the issue had to do with one poster vs. some others. The only issue after all seems to be the response to the implementation, otherwise it's a sound one for now.
I was aware that the issue had to do with one poster vs. some others. The only issue after all seems to be the response to the implementation, otherwise it's a sound one for now.
Anonymous
No.3686
I'll admit to getting on KB's case anytime he started ranting about Glimmerniggers, but as long as he's not doing that I don't mind accommodating him with the new measures. Its not an ideal situation, and it's not ban on site for Glimmer, but its an acceptable compromise desu.
16 replies | 2 files | 7 UUIDs | Archived