Should /poner/ be changed to a Blue Board, remain a Red board, or should some other route be taken?
Remember that /mlpol/ and /sp/ are both red boards
https://strawpoll.com/PKgle1RYaZpAlternative Proposal:
Add a rule that would let a thread OP on /poner/ decide if the thread is going to be NSFW or SFW.
Ideally this would be done through a change in code where upon thread creation an OP checks a box, and each thread would signify that. This could be added retroactively by moderation. Then perhaps a user can have an option to filter all NSFW checked threads. Pupper says this feature could not be in effect until tomorrow at the very earliest.
Blue board with pornography allowed when spoilered, and no porn dump threads.
>>2199this or blue /poner/
>>2199Actually, reading the proposal in the other thread, I'll change this to request to spoilering the image with a NSFW warning, rather than a spoiler warning, if that's technically possible to implement. Otherwise people will just use it to troll.
>>2198>/poner/: blue board (or at least spoiler porn)>/mlpol/: Ponies allowed NO EXCEPTIONS (no change)/mlpol/ itself is already a porn board. Just post the porn there.
It should be red. If you want a blue board, then go to NHNB /fim/. Blue /poner/ doesn't really serve any purpose, and what's worse, contradicts the whole "ponies, no exceptions' thing. If I wanted an SFW board, I'd go to NHNB.
>Alternative proposal
If you absolutely have to go this route, then every thread should be set as NSFW by default and SFW threads can have spoilered/linked NSFW if someone needs to post it.
By the way, I have a suggestion to make: enable thread-wide IDs like /mlpol/ and /qa/ have.
>>2198Personally I don't care, but I've seen people complaining about it.
Ideally it should have been a blue board from the very beginning. Now you're kinda stuck between pleasing people who already left and won't really come back, or antagonizing people who post currently. Then again, overflow of porn generals might cause drop in meaningful user activity in the long term.
I heard that /mlp/ allowed clop pics before scruffening, but I'm not sure how it worked on a blue board.
>>2212NHNB shouldn't be used as a second place to post, MLPOL should be able to exist on its own.
>>2199This, problem solved
>>2215Then /poner/ shouldn't be a blue board. Otherwise, unless you're an eqgfag, G5fag or love kino life, you'd be better off posting on NHNB.
>>2220Guess what? I don't like NHNB. At all.
Porn isn't inherently bad, but weak willed will turn anything into cumdump if given enough time and leeway, basically what happened to /gif/, /b/ and /trash/. So imo nsfw images are ok when they are part of something else, for example spicing up greentext, but mindless porn dumping is retarded and will in long run cause more harm than good.
>>2221Then deal with red /poner/ or try finding SFW MLP board somewhere else, if such a board even exists outside of currently deceased halfchan's /mlp/.
>>2227Screw your false dichotomy.
I think people are focusing on porn dumping because it's the current, prominent issue when the simple reality is that mindless imagedumping in general is bad for board health. It's why most general threads on /mlp/ are dogshit. Very few people mind if someone posts a nsfw image as a part of a discussion, it's lazy spam that's a problem. It's part of why I don't like multi-image uploading on altchans, it's encouraging that kind of behavior.
>>2207>spoilering the image with a NSFW warningIt should be doable (anything is doable with enough work). But I will have to do some work on code and tweaks to database and thinking on best way to do it. So if could take a little while, and in the interim spoilered images might be a bit of russian roulette until I get that implemented. Unless people will be honest and say image is NSFW in post body.
>>2212>enable thread-wide IDsI don't know about this one. The only benefit I can see from it is being able to tell when someone is sockpuppeting, which is something mods should watch and point out for anyway. And since this site allows VPNs unlike 4chan, it'd be pretty easy to fake being a different user anyway.
We have /mlpol/ for porn dumping.
Porn dumping is supposed to be encouraged on /mlpol/, in spirit of the April 2017 merge.
>>2230Why are these people bitching about this board being red when they have nhnb????
>>2233Because believe it or not, not everyone likes NHNB.
>>2230the spoiler part seems unnecessary, most people are going to click on them anyways
just prohibiting porn dump threads is enough
>>2231>The only benefit I can see from it is being able to tell when someone is sockpuppetingI can think of another fun benefit: ID dubs
>>2235Believe it or not, if you want SFW only board, you should go somewhere else for that. Somewhere that is not here. Somewhere like 8moe where you can make your own /mlp/ without blackjack and wtih no hookers.
>>2241This but unironically.
I don't have anything against red /poner/, but as an 8 year resident I would like to remind newcomers that /mlpol/ isn't just a red board; it's a porn board. Porn is an intended part of the ecosystem of /mlpol/, so maybe consider posting the porn on the main board if porn on /poner/ is an issue.
>>2198I agree wtih this alternative proposal it's probably the best proposal where both sides will not bitch about it and the ones who want it blue can just filter the nsfw threads
>enable thread-wide IDs
Not a fan, this board was created to simulate /mlp/ behaviour as much as possible, and IDs go against that. IDs are just another way of namefagging/tripfagging/avatarfagging/flagfagging. Might also encourage obnoxious reddit behaviour of digging up your post history if threads are long enough.
>>2212>enable thread-wide IDsFuck no. Don't do that. You can already toggle IDs on/off on the main board. It's bad enough when OPs forget to toggle them off there: it demonstrably discourages casual image dumping.
>>2212This. The only people objecting to this are barbieniggers because NHNB doesn't deal with their shit. If you want futa AI images of your favorites barbies, post them on the red board
>>2249>barbieniggersYes, you definitely sound like you come from NHNB. You can't go a post without mentioning your boogeyman.
Can you niggers keep your civil war in the other thread?
>>2198Voting to keep the site as is but with a "no porn dump threads" rule. At least for /poner/
>Alternative Proposal
Isn't it overcomplicated in both coding side AND moderation side? Essentially two boards are existing inside of one board in parallel. Maybe a bit too ambitious, we need the decision now, not when 4chan is already up.
>>2199This
>>2207And meh this is unnecessary, just be careful opening spoilers
Making /poner/ a blue board is the best choice IMO, but I'm voting for the "label nsfw' compromise because the blue board restriction can be implemented later, and because I agree with anons who insist that Mlpol is and has always been NSFW.
>>2252I use both, spic. Porn spam is nothing like /mlp/
>>2264Then why are you against a blue board?
>>2260This.
We already have a red pony board. It's /mlpol/. Adding a second red pony board offers us little, and threatens to split content from our main board.
/poner/ was made to accommodate refugees by emulating /mlp/, which is a blue board. Adding a blue board to this site offers us a different type of board experience from our main board.
>>2265>blue board>there's still a bunch of porn threads>all the porn is just spolieredYeah totally the same. Using both sites for different reasons is a better alternative
>>2268>>there's still a bunch of porn threadsMost people here seem to agree they don't want porn dumps. If a NSFW picture of Applejack in a waifu thread makes it a "porn thread" to you, then why were you even on /mlp/ in the first place? The majority of the threads were coom central.
>>2269On /mlp/ porn images were allowed just fine, they just had to be linked instead of attached. I guess the argument is, catboxing is effort, and most Anons will go to the least effort path, leading to mostly SFW thread
>>2269/mlpol/ wants porn dumps. We want porn dumps to scare away reddit normies that infest /pol/, and to slideontbs-old news threads. Maybe mods could move the porn threads over there, where they belong.
How's this:
>/poner/ mostly-blue, but not strictly enforced.
>Porn dumps go to /mlpol/
>>2269I get that you're being extremely disingenuous, but most threads did not have random porn images posted throughout. Maybe you're a /jdb/ fag or a vinyl fag (barbie threads had a lot too), but the rest of the board wasn't like that.
>>2270I'm fine with that solution too,though.
>>2274Most threads did not have porn imagery, but the concepts and discussion were definitely mostly coom.
But since you're a NHNB fag you can only parry anything with the usual "oh, babienigger" retort. No, faggot, not everything in life is as black and white as you like it to be.
>>2276Way to move the goalpost.
I've already stated i use both sites. I made a suggestion and you got mad. You're also the one calling the nhnb mods pedos and shitting on it all day.
>>2232>>2243>>2246>>2267>>2271>>2273These are my posts, and my contribution as a long time resident of this site.
I have said my part, and I will now be bowing out of this discussion, since I'm not super invested either way. Whatever the result is, I hope you all have fun, and maybe still stick around when/if 4chan ever comes back.
>>2279meds, those are my posts
porn is fun and rules are for fags
i want to smother my face in ponuts
>>2199Came to post this. If unspoiled the poster gets a warning/ban. I think should be the best solution.
i'm just a tourist, but i'm not sure for what reason the changes are to be made.
if porn dumps are the problem, there can be a separate board just for them, where generals would naturally form to contain it.
if it's to not scare away newcomers, then a clearly marked sfw board can be made for generic conversations. i get that /poner/ is a large board, and you don't want to split the userbase, but a filter of any kind that hides nsfw threads will effectively do that anyway. so a second board (sfw poner) would just make thing easier to moderate and to understand for users
>>>/qa/9337 →I had a feeling that the one who posted about how the one leaving the board forever over stripefag thread was a falseflag bait to make the board look worse via astroturfing.
Most pony imageboards have a line between what's allowed and what isn't. Even for porn, and /poner/ is showing there's a good reason for it again.
>Hyperfuta fags in /tf2/>Striped fag spam>Random porn threads that are basically slides>Diaperfags>Blobfat fags>Scatfags>ZoofagsThe list goes on.
I support going from free-speech ultimatum to a rules adjustment.
>>2199>>2211This is an okay compromise with no need for extra changes to code, but requires more moderation and ponyfags are known to abuse lack of moderation to post porn. But /mlpol/ already allowed unspoilered porn from the beginning so I agree /poner/ doesn't need to be a full blood red, people can just cross link to porn just like /mlp/ to /trash/ if they want to share. However ponyfags are notoriously lazy and like to shit where they eat.
>>2198The rule of nsfw/sfw per thread by OP is reasonable, it reminds me of the 8chan abiltity on some boards that allowed OP to pick if a thread would have IDs or not, giving more power to self-moderation without screeching and spamming is a good thing thereby being able to filter out spam like the stripfag or the gorefag since their entire posting purpose is to be seen and ruffle feathers, IDs would shut that down.
Back to the nsfw/sfw thread toggle. If you were to go with this then I would suggest the site as a whole have the ability to switch and toggle on and off the ability to even see porn threads. Much like how 4chanx had a work only mode that turned off all images so there was no chance of seeing porn.
Going further you could code a sfw/nsfw checkmark on fileupload just like how you spoil things now. There's no way you could ever automate flagging if a file is porn or not, but leaving it up to the users to rely on an honor system is much better than nothing. And if a file is checkmarked as nsfw then it would be auto hidden from people who want to see sfw only.
>>2290I've reached out to NHNB, and they have had the same phenomenon; a small handful of posters trying to stir shit. They are aware that we are not a threat, and I am confident that they feel the same way.
the only problem with the zigger thread was the retard spamming gore and shooting webms because he was butthurt instead of just ignoring the thread
retarded autists falseflagging about porn is worse than porn and rulesfagging is fucking gay
>>2278>You're also the one calling the nhnb mods pedosYou're literally the first one to say this.
>>2296Fuck off and quit stirring shit between the sites.
>>2288>where generals would naturally form to contain it.This site has a no-generals rule though.
>>2298>everyone who disagrees with me is the same personIt's all so tiresome.
>>2300This site also hasn't had a general try and assert it's self in 8 years. We can compromise, as long as the generals don't get out of hand, and why would they without jannies trying to slide threads off all the goddamn time, to boost engagement.
>>2291nhnb has it's own problems, their userbase and mod/admin latches onto a boogeymen extremely easily. I have no idea where "nhnb mods are pedos" comes from, but they throw around barbienigger accusations at the drop of a hat for any disagreement of the clique's approved status quo, and are more bias moderation heavy even without EQG in the picture.
So for that reason I would rather not bother with it and take /poner/ be a blue board than use nhnb. It's just a smoother experience here which goes a long way.
A blue board with red file options, or blue board that moves porn threads to /mlpol/ is a better short term solution.
>>2302I don't think the no-general rule applied to applies to /poner/ what so ever. Theres already generals here and /mlpol/. You should take into consideration that you're looking at Global rule list from the [b]original[way it was thought up, in 2017 directly after /mlpol/ was deleted on 4chan/b]
A revised version of the rules was never made, because it just became common knowledge on what's allowed. like when anonfilly was banned on /mlp/ it ruffled feathers on /mlpol/ when they made it, but eventually it was accepted as harmless
>>2199Literally the first fucking reply is the solution to all our problems and everyone who disagrees is a retarded nigger troon
>>2307Yes, which isn't technically a general until it's on its second edition, nevermind the fact that /britpol/ is a respected rival of /mlpol/ in the 4cc/poleague (I say rival, but we all know the record, lol). And yes, what, less than 48 hours ago they posted a thread - on the mainboard, instead of being sissies - and for that they are welcome up until they become a problem, which why would they?
You faggots don't know the first thing about hospitality I swear,...
>>2312I can't believe I'm that brainlet that I only just got why it starts with rule #3 (I read them the first time yesterday)
main problem with general is that they turn into bumpfest on faster boards, meanwhile generals on slow board look lot nicer, so basically its problem with very nature of imageboards and per thread active user ratio. For example one way to solve generals dilemma is to make special board for them, sticky every general and remove limits from them, so nothing gets slid off and no need to bump ever essentially turning imageboard into forum format, althoug this would require some sort of "view x amount of posts" or eventually longer general will suck up all ram in universe when tried to view. So its pile of problems with pile of answers that cause more problems.
>>2322I dunno, generals tend to take over a board. Just look at what happened to /v/. Especially since people make generals for the smallest shit. The best "generals" are those that are remade after a certain period of inactivity, like the /pts/ threads on /mlp/.
the best way to deal with generals is to remove the catalog
but no one wants to have that discussion
>>2315>You faggots don't know the first thing about hospitality I swear,...I do, as it happens. I got permission prior to posting it, as I'm not a total asshat. This place is comfy, and I'm perfectly aware that I am a guest.
>>2327Not you, I was there, you've been lovely. I'm talking about the people who have been vested in this site for 5 minutes, who want to lecture the rest of us about what our well-established rules "should" mean
>>2198We need a board whats not just a porn dump.
The OP selects option won't limit porn threads, nor spoilering either.
Writefags won't stay if their thread gets archived due to n+1 th porn thread. Nor does any normal discussion threads sustain itself if a random anon decides to spam porn.
>>2325Generals are good when content is constantly being made, however a lot of anons just post the 5 pictures and repeat when it dies.
>>2322I've used a thread like that on 8chan. Just making a cyclical sticky can get stale too. There's can be a culture around generals with making new OP pics and whatever, like the drawthreads
>>2334Same 5 pictures *
Goes for most generals on /mlp/
>>2282Fake and gay.
>>2288>if porn dumps are the problem, there can be a separate board just for themWe already have a board for porn dumps: /mlpol/.
Maybe that isn't obvious because the porn activity on the main board is low due to dwindling activity, but /mlpol/ is a porn board.
>>2291This is a good point. It's just like in 2017 when a handful of leftist discord trannies sockpuppeted an argument trying to get gay clop banned as an effort to fragment the community. It was an engineered non-issue trying to drive away users, with partial success.
This entire discussion might not be necessary. The bulk of you faggots are going to leave in three weeks when 4chan goes back up anyway. Maybe we should wait until after that to make decisions on rules.
>>2300>This site has a no-generals rule though.Tbh, that hadn't been enforced all that well, and we've considered removing it. A bunch of de-facto generals remain with impunity because they don't have "general" in their OP, and then some that do stay up anyway.
>>2302This.
We let /sg/ and Anonfilly stay here for years. Exceptions can be made in the spirit of hospitality.
>>2329Understandable. I never quite understood the concept of moving to another chan and then demanding people enact the rules they are used to following. Tism scared of change? Stockholm? Not sure, but its retarded. When in Rome, do as the Romans.
>>2329Since this is an anonymous message board, which encourages judging each posts by its merit, your status as an oldfag really shouldn't mean anything.
>>2344erm newfag cope
t. newfag
>>2347t. has been on 4chan since 2005
It means nothing. Let your posts be judged on its content, not on your status. It is what chans were designed for.
>>2338/mlp/ was a containment board, so anytime they can get out of the cage is when anons go nuts on coom and shitposting.
Just have a sticky
>Discourage porn on /poner/, encourage them to post on /mlpol/>Low quality shitposts threads shouldn't just go on /poner/, post them on /sp/If you do that, then generals, shitposters and pornfags aren't competing in the same boardspace. People who wanna shitpost can do that and people who want generals not to get slid don't have to deal with slide porn and slide shitposts.
>>2342It's not even most who do this, it's a very vocal minority; same with politics, same with social media, same with society as a whole.
>>2344Who's asserting status? If a wall-of-text becomes necessary, it will be forthcoming. I'm just trying to save myself the effort of having to delineate every aspect of why /britpol/ did it absolutely right to such a degree that there was never even a question raised as to their permissibility EVEN under a rigid interpretation of the rules. It was just "Oh, /britpol/ is here, good OP too."
And without having expressly discussed the matter, you can bet that generals that mind their P's and Q's won't even have an eye batted at them
I haven't posted here regularly in years but I feel like a lot of the site's identity is being a non-cucked chan and it might lose it's identity if a blue board overtakes the red ones. Like I don't want things to get to a point where I get banned for posting nigger in the wrong place. Trying to make things appealing to a wider audience is what ruins things. Just my thoughts.
>>2359>blue board means you cant type niggerThat's some impressive mental gymnastics you have.
>>2365They aren't sending their best. No one who has been here for any duration needs to announce it.
>>2198Not to doompost, but does it matter? 4chan hasn't been irreparably harmed. They could slap an updated Linux or BSD distro on the server and an audited open source chan software package and be back up in an hour. It's more of a management issue they're dealing with because their moderation got compromised. Just let us do what we want, and when /mlp/ comes back in a couple of weeks, traffic will drop again (particularly if /poner/ is blue since then it's just a slower /mlp/).
>>2198>Red or BlueThe board should be Purple like Twilight.
>>2385I would expect there would be a lot of gnashing of teeth.
I don’t see a need to change things. The whole spiel on /mlp/ was always that if porn were allowed then the board would turn into nothing but dumps. Well that’s bullcrap. I was there when you could post porn and it was fine. It hasn’t happened here either. I think it’s fine. You guys scared of getting caught at work or something?
>>2389I'm posting from my cubicle
>>2389No, it's assholes exploiting loopholes and gray areas in the rules. Sensible posters are sensible, it's the "Oh you said this so you MEANT this" followed by the "Whaddya mean I can't 'that'?" posters that are really the issue. Thats not to say that some horsposters aren't justified in wanting at least the filtered appearance of SFW, and so an attempt to compromise.
>>2365>>2369I was banned multiple times for posting nigger on 4tran so I'm a little paranoid.
Niggers.
>>2399Kek, you will never be banned for posting niggers.
>>2400look mom I'm in the mass replier's post!
>>2400>>599 →Didn't realise I was missing this fetish in my life.
>>2393That’s just shitposting. People are gonna do that no matter what the rules are. What happened here, did I miss something? I mean, I saw the striped thread. That’s shitposting. Remove it and call OP a fag. That’s the proper course of action. That’s what you do. You don’t go and change the rules to forbid porn just so you never have to worry about seeing that shit again. Shitposters are gonna post porn anyway, so why even “compromise”? You’re all sounding like a bunch of gun controlfags. This isn’t /mlp/. God damn migrants coming to my board and trying to change things…
>>2401yeah I thought the same thing on 4cuck until it happened, but I don't want to derail things anymore.
This poster already articulated my general sentiment;
>>2342because complaining about porn here is like complaining about anime on 4chan. It's only been a couple days of refugees and thought is already being put into how to accommodate them better? That's not a good sign if I'm being honest.
>>2411>God damn migrants coming to my boardtf are you talking about this board was made this week
>>2411Website. Whatever. You know what I meant.
>>2411>hallo saar we build temple yes>no kill cow yes>very very good
I for one liked the striped thread
>>2421ponyfags treat stripedfags like how everyone else treats ponyfags
the ouroboros eats its own tail
>>2422every marginalized group has the right to shit on those further below them
trying to find solidarity with other diaspora is unironically very jewish
>>2424I'm not going to apologize for having a fetish
and I'm not going to pretend like shitting up a fetish thread and shitting up the rest of the board because you don't like a fetish thread isn't multiplicatively more autistic
>>2430your fetish is a shit, simple as
posting in a shitkey I mean sticky
>>2198I don't care what you do but take away the auto refresh being on by default and do something about the way threads load when you enter them and immediately go to the bottom because right now the multiple images per post means doing that on a long thread makes it jitter the fuck out for a minute.
>>2400I think it's worth considering the board has only been up for a couple days. Of course there's going to be porn spam. You couldn't post porn directly on /mlp/. People are naturally going to do "the new thing" until it isn't new. See the dice roll spam when /mlp/ received that feature.
>>2445Just uncheck the box at the bottom.
>>2198I'm autistic and therefore hate change, so keep everything the same.
>>2481Can you not fucking read the part where long and image heavy threads don't load properly and make that impossible?
>>2445I'll look into adding an Option to turn off Auto Update in configuration tomorrow.
Got a few other quality of life things I will try to look at also. If you can add an post about it in
>>>/qa/9226 → it would be appreciated so I can look into it easier (but I will likely remember).
>>2510>>2445Err... I see I already have that Option :)
My brain was not fully up to date and working. Go to [Options] (upper right) and uncheck "Auto update thread"
>>2490I've never had that problem, only giant stickies with 2k+ posts like the sharty hack thread. what kind of a toaster are you on?
holy shit derpy and caboose
>>2542And we will never know whether Joel was just too based for Austin or if dude just went crazy.
Agreed with the alternative solution. Just make NSFW the default, and anons can choose SFW if they want. Remember, lewds are our first line of defense as a site. It is literally what the original /mlpol/ ran and worked on. All the redditors and shills ran away because of the "weird porn."
>>2198>nhnb dwellers are the only ones shilling blue boardWhy can't they fuck off already
>>2593>responding to something no one said
I'm noticing there's some artificial attempts to statrt cross board infighting. Both here and in NHNB
>>2605It's just Babsflag, ignore him and his broken english.
>>2605>pic related>>2607It's more than one, who are you kidding?
>>2605Usually, after the initial shock of diaspora a group will congregate privately and utilise their disgruntlement to displace it by causing disharmony, as per Rule 43.
>>2616Whenever you have a mass of people losing either the feeling of or literal control, there's always an underlying feeling of discontent that can only be assuaged by garnering power/influence in whatever manner possible; for some, this comes in the form of causing as much trouble as possible and gaining from what opportunities aries.
Here, not so much. Behave.
>>2605>let's go to nhnb and see what they post>some guy image dumping posts from mlpol>some guy whining about the striped thread from mlpolYeah it's nhnb that started it not a surprise
>>2607speak of the devil
>2627
>>2627I don't think this is NHNB, this seems to be someone who doesn't care about either group and wants to amuse themselves by pitting us against each-other.
>>2620>elongating my original point.Alrighty.
>Here, not so much. Behave.I am. Others? Not so much.
>>2627They were banned though
>>2627nhnb didn't do anyone any favors calling everyone a barbienigger in the bunker threads 1-2. It's not babsfag capping poner posts and going back to jerk off how they are better for not using this board.
But this is offtopic for the blueboard discussion, unless you take in the account that they just want to have /poner/ as a porndump
>>2212You're going to run into the same brick-wall autism that nhnb fags have decided on as the agreed hivemind mantra well before this hack even took down 4chan. Anyone who doesn't like using nhnb or like nhnb is a barbienigger/babsflag
>>2249
>>2482How did you even survive the death of 4chan?
>>2663>NHNB is one person
>>2635Apologies for redundancy
>>2643Shutup, don't act like vpns arent a thing or there arent workarounds. Sus for saying it
>>2663You sir seem to misunderstand which group predates whom. Sit down, we will have the main course ready soon. ^_~
>>2674Would you faggots stop trying to ignorantly conflate things? Thats giving you the benefit of the doubt of course.
>>2682>Which group predates whichso /mlpol/?
>>2441i think stripedfags should have their ips attached to their posts
>>2718i think you should be less butthurt
>>2696Better question, who shut down /qa/ first?
>>2728What does kway have to do with it?
>>2764/qa/ is the rightful property of Mlpol. Oh don't you know? Years before soyjack got /qa/ shutdown by c ringe-posting
Aha! lame-ass soyjacks, /mlpol/ - or excuse me, the Denver Broncos (cuz /mlpol/ had nothing to do with it :3) - spammed /qa/ so hard that it was shut down for 3 days
Whatever decision you choose, you need to do this today. 24h for accounting various Anon's time zones is understandable, but further you go without a decision, the worse it gets. You won't be able to change the board culture if it already developed. So time is of the essence.
(By "decision" I mean immediate rule decision, not a promise to develop some code)
>>2921>you can't change board cultureSure you can, /mlp/ is prime example of it, before shutdown /mlp/ and its culture has nothing to do with what it was when it first came to be.
>>2924The Scruffening was a clusterfuck disaster. I'm not sure it counts as "easily changing", everyone hated it. The only reason /mlp/ survived is due to sheer user numbers and inertia, which is different from current situation.
>>2921>Pupper says this feature could not be in effect until tomorrow at the very earliest.
>>2766after being a fan of them my whole life, the Broncos being the focus of an entire board still feels surreal
my vote is for red board btw
i dont plan on looking at this site in public and i love poni pussi
and more rules makes places mega gay
>>2921This split is pretty close in 12h, so the divide is there but redboard is among the lesser of the overall options.
I would have picked a multiple choice if I could support more than one but red wouldn't be one, as that's just a slower /trash/
>>2963>suddenly 6 more votes within 30 minutes
Vote blue for trixie, Vote blue for mares
>>2968someone is trying to rig it into a four-way tie?..
>>2971Gotta make all options equal to try to show that there's no consensus. Then we can continue our constant infighting.
>>2972>>2971>Gotta make all options equalHmmm...
Nooo make this a blue board! Won't somebody please think of the 4children
>>2995>4childrenPoor foals.
Ackshually democracy doesn't work when there are more than two options, there's a veritasium video on that.
You have to polarize to only two options to make it work.
>>2995It isnt always about some virtue signaling types shit; sometimes, a good conversation can only really be had when there's no coomer content distracting your brain.
>>2198Or you could just make rule, like /pone/, where all nsfw images (porn, gore, things a reasonable individual wouldn't view in public with strangers looking over their shoulder) must be spoilered and anyone opening up a spoiler acknowledges they are at least 18. Why have a spoiler feature if you aren't going to use it? Any violators could get a warning and the nsfw images spoilered by a jannie.
>>3016>rules>all nsfw images must be spoilered and anyone opening up a spoiler acknowledges they are at least 18Do you know where you are?
>>2995IDK man I just don't like porn. I asked for just a whole new dedicated SFW board though, I figured it would be the least disruptive to an established community I previously visited only about once a year.
>>3028Some people are afraid of fragmentation. It's already overfragmented over various alts
>>3021Do you? Because you're in a thread where the admins are optioning turning this board into a blue board. Why is this happening? Probably because either A. The site owners themselves don't like it but want to work with the users or B. They keep getting complaints and they want to find a solution to mitigate it. /pone/ had this same discussion back in 2014 because, surprise!!!!, a lot of the people that left /mlp/ to make the board wanted to post porn, so they had a discussion just like this, had spergs just like you, and came to that compromise which lasted until the site literally died.
>>3031I understand your female sensitivities, hey! not everybody can stomach the horsepuss, but asking to turn an imageboard into a normie safe space is too much to ask.
>>3031>refugee getting uppity in the place offering to house himt.refugee (with manners)
>>2198The other solution I can give is allow thread ops to mark a thread nsfw/sfw and have a user option to "spoiler all content in nsfw threads". No rules necessary if see shit you don't like, skill issue cry more.
>>3037>The other solution I can give is allow thread ops to mark a thread nsfw/sfw and have a user option to "spoiler all content in nsfw threads"Once you give them an inch, the woke will take a mile. Every Single Time.
>>3031The site we're on has been up for seven years and hasn't magically died from its only pony board being red. /pone/ died because it was already a ghost town for years. mlpol has remained up and moderately active in contrast, without having to bend the knee to censorship. Now refugees come here and it's suddenly a problem? Give me a break.
>>3039So you want admins to delete /poner/ in favor of /mlpol/?
>>3041That's exactly what he said, retard. Especially the part where he said nothing like that
>>3039>Now refugees come here and it's suddenly a problem?They resent the /mlpol/ supremacy and demand the locals to accommodate their whims instead of being civil and assimilate.
>>3042What's the difference between /poner/ and /mlpol/, then? You even clamor about adding IDs and stuff, rendering differences nil
>>2198Sorry but, what kind of question is this?
Please, remember why we post horse_pussy in the first place, /mlpol/ was conceived before -oomers even existed, please take a second and wonder why is it that so much horse pussy gets posted on the board, are anons REALLY that into the horse pussy?
Needless to say, some anons are indeed THAT into horse pussy, but the majority of anons are truly not. I can't be the only anon that has 10+ years of horse pussy stored in their memory, to the point looking at it is like looking at my own hand.
The true purpose of horse porn under the mlpol domain is to shoo away every single user that lacks the mental maturity to just...Fucking ignore it.
This includes reddit, overly sensitive people, and most people that post on their phone (because people can see the horse pussy over their shoulder). Horse pussy is not there only for the enjoyment of the local populus, it is there to heighten the quality of the site.
To ban horse pussy is to go against the very thing that united /mlp/ and /pol/, HORSE PUSSY GETS RID OF REDDIT.
>>3044>YouQuit putting words in people's mouths. The difference is there's hardly any current event politics on this board. If anons wanna see the newest trump thing, theyll go the the board with trump
>>3039>moderately activeoh come on, unless there was some happening, there were barely any posts, now you have 50-100x traffic without any specific happening.
>>3045>HORSE PUSSY GETS RID OF REDDITWell said and an undeniable fact.
>>3044>What's the difference between /poner/ and /mlpol/You don't have politics in /poner/?
Now I wasn't here when /poner/ was conceived, but I clearly remember people's fee-fees got hurt over anons bantering about politics besides their feelgood pony thread, the fact that mlpol mixes political threads and pony threads under the same catalog has been a complaint for basically ever.
I guess that's why poner was created, but maybe someone that was here when it was actually created can shed some more light into it.
>>3049/poner/ is mainly for refugees of 4chans /mlp/
I get some of the complaints since it's a culture shock to many but changing the foundation of your site to please a few uppity people seems kinda lame
>>3045I don't want to use you-know-what word (it tends to derail discussions), but you're aware that many people who draw anatomically correct porn are also SJWs?
>>3051>anatomically correctYou mean anthro.
>>3051Really nigga, that's it?
>>3053I mean non-anthro, retard. Learn definitions.
>>3048Being actively hostile but in a playful way has always been part of mlpol culture, I guess. That's why we have the 'By clicking New Reply, I acknowledge the existence of the Israeli nuclear arsenal.', remember how supposedly CIA agents can't acknowledge the Israeli nuclear arsenal?
That's why we have that thing in there, it's a joke, sure, hence it's playful, but at the same time it is kind of hostile, trying to willfully exclude a group of users from the board.
>>3051>many people who draw anatomically correct porn are also SJWs>SJWThat's a word I havent heard in a long time.
Lmao I have no idea and I honestly don't give much of a fuck either way, the artist has some skill and I appreciate that, if he wants to 1v1 me on the forums then let's go for it, I'm always up for some nice arguments.
I think the argument is between "spoiler clop" and "don't spoiler clop". It's kinda too late to make it into a blue board, that ship has sailed. Those who wanted the blue board already seen the redness and left without looking back. Whose who wanted redness are currently posting, but would leave if it becomes blue.
Also note about how porn/image dumping is stupid especially on mlpol... there is literally ponerpics link in boardlist, meaning that if you want look at wall of X, you can just go there and search for it.
>>3061These faggot niggers wanting a blue board you literally have a blue board over at nhnb.org like fuck off already cunt why should the owner bend the knee towards /mlp/ refugees like yourself you don't own this site retard
>>3061You can torrent the comics, doesn't mean that storytime threads are useless
>>3062You already have /mlpol/, tho. /poner/ is specifically for this situation.
>>3063Speaking of porn dumps there isn't a lot of porn on here anyway are you literally assmad about this being a red board over some striped thread
>>2230Spoilering an image could bring up another checkerbox for it being a porn pic or not perhaps? If checked it will get it's own unique spoiler image like ACHTUNG PRON on it or something like that.
>>3063>you already haveThe fucking nerve
>>3062>These faggot niggers wanting a blue board you literally have a blue board over at nhnb.orgI believed what they really want is that ALL pony sites to be "sanitized" to "their" standards. Very insolent this fags.
>>3064I'm neutral. I'm just pointing out that /mlpol/ culture and /poner/ culture can be different, just like how /v/ culture and /mlp/ culture are different, despite being on the same site.
>>2294>webmsSpeaking of webms, do Anons prefer sound enabled by default, muted by default, or no sound? It's enabled by default currently.
>>3081>do Anons prefer sound enabled by default, muted by default, or no sound? It's enabled by default currently.WTF is this?
Do anons need to be pampered with ridiculous details about sound or not sound? Are anons now fucking femoids?
>>3089>Are anons now fucking femoidsAnussy
>>3048This argument doesn't work when you take in the account that porn threads just have far less discussion. Reddit shoo shoo was for /pol/s shills, you don't know what you're talking about.
>>3062seethe, underageb&.
you already have /mlpol/ to post nsfw and be a faggot
“No Generals” does not apply to /poner/, if that was not know
i think it would be the best to have OP be able to mark a thead as sfw, if someone posts nsfw they get shadowb&
>>3164add a ip counter pls
>>3169>silly goose detected
>>3176>>3174i didint notice
Now do a run off vote of the two winners of the poll
>>3064imo it's not a porn dump yet, but The /nmp/ >
>>852 → thread starting with porn in the OP is in bad taste, and immediately sullies the whole traditional purity mentality of the thread. It comes off as more like a tourist made the thread than a genuine regular. And since it doesn't even have the subject in the OP right, making it harder to find for people who used the general, that's obviously the case. You should be aware that the OP will usually set the tone of the rest of the thread, especially if it has porn in it.
>>3039I was thinking that myself.
>>3047everyone wants more traffic to their site until they see what that looks like. the quote "growth for the sake of growth is the ideology of a cancer cell" comes to mind.
>>3257>>3039Honestly, you guys are right. I was up in arms about a certain thread, but I'm satisfied that we can now hide threads in the catalog. I don't want any more fighting, and I don't presume to dictate the way the site should be run. None of the proposed changes have been implemented yet, and I can't honestly say that I take issue with anything happening on the site right now. I think others should be asking themselves, "Is there really a problem here?" For me, the answer is no.
t. refugee
>>3047Honestly, I know most(?) are likely to leave at some point, as one does for whatever reason, I just wanna enjoy our time together.
>>3265>Honestly, I know most(?) are likely to leave at some point, as one does for whatever reason, I just wanna enjoy our time together.Blessed post, anon has reached enlightement
>>3264For the record I don't want to discourage new people from posting (welcome by the way) It's just I've seen how ass other sites can be when they get too much attention.
>>3163Cry me a river nigger
>>2199>people can just cross link to porn just like /mlp/ to /trash/ if they want to share.Fuck that. No point in going red if people are just going to do the same thing they did in blue boards.
>>3514>Spoilered porn was allowed on /mlp/Another D&Cfag outed as a newfag
>>3514Oh wait I quoted the wrong post
>>2290
>>2198>Add a rule that would let a thread OP on /poner/ decide if the thread is going to be NSFW or SFW.If people are going to bitch about horse pussy showing up in the catalog then just go for this one.
why contain the lust for mares
>>3528>>2198Oh and as a suggestion, what about different colors for the OP image divs in the catalog ? Red for the NSFW ones, blue for the safe ones.
>>3514But anonnyponer, that is what people are doing with extra steps already
>>3586I'm >>24303 and >>24312 in that image and I've been using this board actively, I don't think there's any real effectiveness in trying to get people on other boards to vote a certain way. Most people are using both because both have people using them.
>>3589Are you saying nhnb isn't one person? But you won't say how you voted so you must of voted red like nhnb. The nhnb wants another blueboard meme dies tonight.
>>3045>implying anon's don't unironically love horsepussychoke on nigger dicks faggot
>>3607True, I did vote for red. I don't see much point in this being a blue board when we can already see it evening out and people getting into the same rhythms. Hornyposting is about as rampant as it is on /mlp/, just with more images of actual porn instead of cropped porn or suggestive art.
>>3612Is it evening out though? It looks like theres new porn threads every day. The golly friday night one was converted from /v/ to /trash/ in a blink
>>3617That's the thing though, Golly threads always have pseudo-porn in them. The pseudo-porn is just being replaced by actual porn.
>>3620Gollyfags are pedos but the pedolust in Fridaynight pathetic posts here wasnt so blatant on /mlp/.
>>3634Some of it simply comes down to the fact that people are still doing it for the sake of doing it, in the same way that Ponyspam on April Fools got pretty porny once people got sent to /b/. I don't think it's the sign of an accelerating trend though, it's just people playing around in the space.
>>3636I'm not as optimistic as you, and I think refugees are way more likely to pornpost than keep it in their pants and get more creative because they've been in a cage for their entire boards existance. Porn posts are a common thing you'll find in all splinters that allow it, but all those splinters were/or did die because the active community/creativity was stronger on /mlp/
>>3639>all those splinters were/or did die because the active community/creativity was stronger on /mlp/*because imageboards work on a social media effect where everyone congregates where the most people are, combined with the general entropy of the brony fandom killing those communities
>>3639I think at the end of the day the board's small enough that a few people trying to actively be creative makes a big difference. Just gotta do your part, suggest silly things and make the board a fun place to be.
8chan's /mlp/ apparently does this split sfw and nsfw thread's idea, but they leave it to the user to avoid entering threads that wont suit their tastes.
https://8chan.se/mlp/rules.html
>>3650>Do not disrupt obvious sfw threads and discussions with nsfw.Is this what you're talking about? I don't see any options in the thread creation to signifify one as nsfw and one as sfw. So this is meant to be just like a self-policing community to some degree, announcing the thread's direction in the OP of what should be posted like on /mlp/, "Post cute only"(sfw), "RainbowDash, No EQG"ect, "Lingerie"(near nsfw) and then it being more enforced by the mods instead of /mlp/s jannies doing fuck all.
>>3664>So this is meant to be just like a self-policing community to some degree, announcing the thread's direction in the OP of what should be posted like on /mlp/, "Post cute only"(sfw), "RainbowDash, No EQG"ect, "Lingerie"(near nsfw) and then it being more enforced by the mods instead of /mlp/s jannies doing fuck all.Thats what I got from it. Make it clear in the OP text and stick the the thread's intended flow.
>>3674>stick the the thread's intended flowStick to the thread's intended flow.
>>3674In that case Pupper doesn't need to slave away at code for a switch right now. Lotus can just create a rule that the OP's can set their own tone of what can be posted for nsfw/sfw.
That can deal with both sides of the schizowar being waged on /poner/, whos trying to make the board worse for either side. Right now the nsfw proxy war is just baiting and if anons can ignore the bait.
>>3698>both sides of the schizowarThere's always only one side to the schizowar. TF vs HiE drama? Artificial as fuck, forced by one Anon, who argues with himself.
>>3701>TF vs HiE drama? Artificial as fuck, forced by one AnonMostly, yes, but a lot of newfags pick sides in stuff like this to try to fit in. All it takes is one schizo to create an omnipresent "debate" when some anons don't know better
>>3701Kek. but I'm talking about
rewatchfags who are FiM exclusive and spamed some zoo in eqg threads to drive them off, talk shit about how bad mlpol is for the stripe and anthro, general elitism, calling everyone barbieniggers that doesnt like nhnband
shartyfags who will post striped bait or ai abominations to drive rewatchfags off and point out how nhnb is 'losing' compared to mlpol. After the striped thread blew up here it died down, they made it again on nhnb for example, and they're occassionally just posting random striped bait into other FiM threads that rewatch/nhnb users will gravitate towards.
>>3713finally someone who sees it for how it is
i thought i was going crazy
>>3721bigger schizos have clearer patterns, iykyk
>>3713It's kinda funny that there's a discussion of the hegelian dialectic going on in that other thread.
>>3819Which thread what now?
>>3840*rolls eyes*
It's on /mlpol/, it's close to the top.
The point of emphasis being that the Hegelian dialectic was attempted to be employed by trying to assert a problem (Stiped-posting) to preipitate a reaction (this must stop!) to produce a solution (either Mlpol caves to outside demand OR it suffers an endless slough of rule exploitation).
But this isn't the first rodeo
>>3863I found it after, but went looking through to see if it was on nhnb first. Should have figured it was beyond the shitposty mind. With the example on
>>>/mlpol/384367 → it's nhnb/sharty like the buffalo/appaloosa but there's nobody to mediate inbetween like the show. People just have to stop being spergs and biting the bait for the most part
>>3884Wouldn't it be nice if we could stop fighting one another
>>3890mlpol is already somewhere between the two extremes but good luck to get those extremes to stop when both think either side deserves no posting, and either isolates in echochambers or wages war more like the hillbillies episode. Rewatchfags have such narrow concepts of the fandom that they easily lash out at anything, making them insufferable and prime targets to exploit any deviation, which mmeans more likely to retreat to the safespaces
>>3898>rewatchfagswho is pushing this? I'm not even done with the show yet and I get called that for posting pictures of non Mane 6 characters. "Rewatchfag" or "rewatchtranny", the people saying this seem to think you're not allowed to watch or discuss anything
>>3901The "
REEEE YOU CAN'T LIKE BG MARES BCUZ THEY HAVE NO PERSONALITY U FUCKIN REWATCHFAG" shit is so stupid, because liking blank state mares is the ultimate validation of their existance.
>>3898Am under no illusions, just talking shit in advance of the reckoning ^_~
>>3901The rewatch tranny label comes from being an extreme gatekeeper while also being a hugbox pussy with little thought. It's not about watching the show, it's about the culture they decided is their identity behind it.
The cytube stream culture was very different than /mlp/ norm, then exported out of cytube and onto the board running things into the ground with forced memes.
Mareschizos was one example that they decided to warp a 'positive' of just loving ponies into a reason to shit on non FiM again - like g5 suddenly wasn't allowed to have mares only dogs. So they think they're gatekeeping mares and be smug over it even if they spam, because they're insufferable faggots.
>>3918>they >theyPsyOp is real. There's no "they", there's no "us". There are only ponies.
>>3918>being smug while spammingWasn't that literally everyone, not just FiM fans? Go into a g5 or Wild Manes thread and anyone calling it gay gets spammed. Go into a barbie thread and anyone calling it gay gets spammed and then deleted. In fact, people bitching about "rewatch trannies" admitted to doing it because it was "sliding" their barbie threads
Don't tell people to stop falling for bait when you fall for "rewatch tranny" bait
Nobody was mentioning it but there's a chance with a banner of "/mlpol/" moving out of Pinkie's aroused pussy appearing.
>>3901Sharty. Check the ghost posts on desuarchive.
Unpopular opinion: anyone who tried to sow division between groups was part of the cancer that killed /mlp/.
>>3929To a degree yes, smugshim fags used to get under my skin. But I understand by now trolling with eqg is anti-elitism masked as elitism. In the new artificial culture mareschizos look incredibly hypocritical with double-standards which gives further reason to reject getting on the new bandwagon of the same shit-cycle.
One can look at the anni stream for a microcosm
Eqg fags didn't feel the need to make an entirely separate anni stream to escape from seeing hooves because even though the trolling anti-elitism message is: "FiM sucks lole hoofcuck" turns out many are still are fans of FiM and ponified eqg, have no issue watching FiM+Eqg. This is the polar opposite of what rewatchfags did, and ARE 200% elitists and screamed about barbies until a safespace was made.
The elitism is why these fags get mocked, labeled and trolled, instead of calming down the sperg outs have only increased. G5fags are clearly anti-elitist as well, as knowing a lot of g4 is discussed in detail among them it's not a reality they actually hate it, but that's what the cytube retards have decided is true.
The entire sliding argument is a double-edged sword. There was factually cases of threads being made to kill pony-only threads, just like threads being made to kill eqg. You need to be able to discern a bad actor from an actual fan. Elitist niggers can't and are far more likely to have autistic fits putting all eqg/g5 fags into the same bucket.
This doesn't just start and end with eqg/g5 and a similar thing played out labeling every Starlight fag as a glimmernigger back then, and surprise surprise it was used then as anti-elitism masked as elitism via a schism of seasons instead of shows over the worship of fags obsession with Faust's seasons and refusing to watch S3 or S4 or S5, ect. But it doesn't change the fact there are genuine people who like post-faust, and Glimmer who aren't just doing it to trolololo Faustfags.
I have no idea what you faggots are discussing and I'm too autistic to read all of it.
I'll just give my input and say that the board should be as blue as possible.
Thanks.
It's been another day and the vote has been very rigged to be red. Before the vote rigging was shared around the redvote was in the minority. With Thread OP selection being the winner. Now we're more than double what
>>2963 was so I would take the winning vote with a grain of salt and take in all accounts of the discussion.
Be advised with a redvote then niggers can post whatever they want unopposed. HVOP, futa anthro, zoo, striped, blobs, ect can also be used to troll each target via redboard rules ala how /trash/ has porn wars to drive off users or kill threads faster, and this would be deterred or put a stop to completely if ANY of the options besides a redboard was picked.
>>4569Pretty sure /mlpol/ anons were telling each other to vote red because they don't want a blue board here. The increase in red votes correlates with an anon or two asking for votes in other threads. Based on what a lot of /mlpol/ residents have said, they want to keep the horsepussy around
>>4573Should also mention that it's their site, so it makes sense that they'd want to keep the status quo. Refugees vehemently against it have been kinda hostile to their hosts and I'm sure that affected the vote somewhat too.
>>3067>the fucking nerveyou fucking fag
>>2198So basically because lotus is retarded 60% of people who want some form of sfw board will be losing to the 40% of gooners who already have /mlpol/.
>>4586Horsepuss supremacy it is called.
Blend in poner.
>uhm, well actually, people already have /mlpol/
>>4573The fuck is this arguement? The anons have spoken. 35% want a red board. The rest DONT
>>4128The reason for their autistic behavior is that mods in mlp shat on them for years. This is the kind of radicalization they search for and want to ferment. Turning the oh look a pony your day is ruined into oh no a doug your day is ruined cucks is got jannies rock hard for some reason.
>>4574Mods created /poner/ to welcome /mlp/ refugees. If that wasn't so, they wouldn't have create the poll in the first place.
I know that /mlpol/ has said
>We do not expect assimiliation, but we DO expect behavior.But /poner/ is brand new. Why have it follow the same general rules of the rest of the boards?
Either way, if oldfags wish to go back on the welcoming, they can always stop communicating with /poner/ and leave it to rot. Soon it will become /trash/ and the great majority of people here will migrate elsewhere.
>>4573/mlpol/ and /mlp/ are vastly different and making /poner/ just pure red lust like the rest of mlpol.net is just another /trash/ except mostly just pony instead of sharing it with others. The votes were shared to at least nhnb who would like to make a designated shitting space, instead of using /clop/
Have a look around the site, even though there are imagedump fags who may like a similar concept of what's posted /mlp/ the creative activity is just not there, shitposting sure but it's not enough. This phenomenon of engagement divide already was a thing outside of imageboards, like how any porn on boorus has a vastly amount of more likes than sfw work, making people far less likely to do something outside of porn.
A blueboard meant that people had to be more interesting and encouraged people to stick around, as porn is the lowest hanging fruit it also gives the least reason for any other creatives who don't just do straight porn to stay, because it will be largely overlooked.
it would be nice to have blue board or at least a policy of spoiler on porn, and sfw OP images so the catalog is browsable (since hiding/spoilering doesnt work on the catalog page itself)
>>4624This. Ignoring the fact the vote was divided between red vs compromises and each one has anons that like their own compromises feels very jewish. Red is the minority when you add all the votes that are NOT red.
the red votes got padded last minute
>>3901 I'm sorry but mare stare mare tooth snowpity memes are over rated zoomer tier garbage memes kys
>>4722i bet you dont even have a brick booty edit downloaded
>>4633As the faggot who wrote that thread in the heat of the moment, no one is going back on anything, and the behavior I was referring to was "not being a problem or unreasonable" which no one has been (except maybe) and being patient, which you have been. This is all new for us (I say us, but I should say them, cuz staff has to implement) and we're both living our best lives and trying to do what can be done as quickly as possible, because ponies.
Have a gender-swapped neighsay from yesterday's rewatch
>>4757And that's what one tends to find being an off-brand chansite. An exceedingly small but very obnoxious minority who will test every and all boundary, from disingenuous posturing, to rule exploitation, let's not forget same/false-fagging with "concern for the community" and "Ehemagherd censorship of my feefees!"
This isn't directed at any site or group, its' clearly a Lee-tier motherfucker who got buttfucked or something.
>>4716Botted views from nhnb they want every board to be nhnb I'm not surprised those fucks want to ruin everything
>>4722Yeah that's why I said mare stare mare tooth snowpity in my post you illiterate nigger
Have any of you faggots seen the newest post about this ?
>>>/qa/9386 →
>>4823thats a lot of text
>>4824He's very long-winded, but he's not wrong
>>4716This is like calling a vote and 40% of the vote is for Republicans, 25% is for Independents, and 35% is for Democrats. The Republicans win but OMG WTF 60% OF THE COUNTRY DIDN'T VOTE FOR DAT! RIGGED!
It's a majority minority, but it still beat out the others. That's how voting works and calling people a jew for that is retarded. Run another vote if you think it was rigged
If we stick with a red board, it's important to make good judgement on whether or not a thread is suitable for posting porn. Occasional porn pics may be fine in some threads. Extended porn post is best suited for dedicated threads, personally.
>>4826I should also mention that this
>>4833 is probably what most anons who voted red would want. Cutting the balls off and just making it blue and exactly like /mlp/ is gay
>>4833Ah yess, lets volunteer a cadre of motivated individuals to sift through what I thought was objectionable material
No
>>4835No. Before anyone responds, the answer - sorry not sorry - is no.
Understand. This site didn't come about through democratic process. We didn't hold votes before people assumed roles, we just did it.
And now, some of that avant-guarde lassais-faire mentality is slapping your in the dick.
the disgusting amount of lies, manipulation, and gaslighting from blue really makes me want to change my vote to straight red. if porn keeps the censorfags away then double the porn. I'd rather live in a full-on red board than coexist with concern trolls!
go back to nhnb! go back to reddit!
>>4824Admins say more time will decide on /poner/ rules for porn, and they may add rules for specific boards as needed like /poner/ instead of global rules only which was used to rage about over /poner/, letting OPs set the tone (the vote people went with pre-offsite sharing) is still on the table.
Here is my take away of the one of the major changes that matters.
- New GR2. Caused by the big one people argue about here is a general crackdown on the lawless void that was /poner/. It means don't be a huge nigger and go fuck up someone else threads, and nobody gets any favoritism. So it's more like the /mlp/ anons wanted but never got with biased tranny jannies. There is just way too many kinds of these threads and post examples to list but could put a dent in the raging autist chasm between different anons liking different things.
tl;dr: look at the pigg
- New GR3. The striped thread that showed up overnight was extremely inorganic and spammed to shit and then counterspammed to shit, both took advantage of a no spam rule and now there is one. This can also mean no 12 additional linky threads to piss people off who complained about linky spam, 80 WoW!glimmer threads, spiderman sagebombs, porn dumping in a sfw discussion thread you dont like, ect.
tl;dr: look at the pigg
>>4860The rules are good, but very subjective and it will mean they will likely be selectively enforced.
Any heated argument can turn into "you're being disruptive of my thread" like this. Very unchan-like. I don't think I have to that most of us use chans because we like to be able to challenge the established status quo.
>>2198OP I would combine the blue board votes into the vote that says let OP choose
Did National Socialists ban porn?
>>4725I highly appreciate the friendly spirit in these trying times, nonny.
>>4876Key wording "massively" and "post in good faith". It isn't just catering to a whiny faggot, for example passing things about threads you dont like will be fine (this goes back to the mod post about what will be allowed on /poner/ do you hate X then call him a faggot).
But camping in the thread like a twat until it archives and making an ass of yourself and derailing it instead of just filtering it and posting in a thread you like, not so much. It's not a lot different than other imageboards besides 4chan really. A strong reason shitflinging grudges has been the norm is because nobody in power was neutral.
is fun allowed on /poner/?
>>4833I dont care about that, I want a blue board so I dont cause my colleagues to be promoted
>>4826>match fixing goodretard. first past the post is awful specifically because of this.
>>4823to be fair, I avoid /qa/ because the behavior on display there is beyond what I have been taught to expect from mods here.
>>4725I ultimately just think its ironic that all of the kvetching I did on /qa/ over trying to pull users from mlp in various times got shat on by you guys and now you're giving it a real go. I don't really think it will be enough, I think a lot of /mlp/ posters must be /vg/ regulars or something because a lot of them are gone, though thank god /create/ is here
>>4815if you want to call it botted then why the fuck dont we just make a thread for a poll and post that way? what the hell is ever the point of voting people will always find a way to say the results never count, normally while ignoring all of the shitty BS they pulled themselves to fix it.
As long as I can post anthro titties all is good
>>4956>I want a blue boardYou got nhnb's fim for that.
>>4876nhnb is now the only overly rulecucked board, even stifling what was already allowed in blueboards. Funny thing, Lotus arriving at nearly the same compromise as moelp almost word to word with the refugees. Great freedompilled minds think alike
>Rule 2: Post in good faith, and do not be massively disruptive of the experience of others.
This should exclude spamming extreme fetish content like scat, watersports, etc. Preferably not posted at all, but at the very least posted rarely with spoilers and trigger warnings. But I already seen Anons posting unspoilered extreme fetish content like that, and post was left alone. This means if you don't like a thread, you just need to spam gore, vore, prolapse, smegma, and other stuff like that, and it would effectively shit down any productive discussion, everyone would just leave. This is kinda a big hole that that rule should have solved, if it was actually enforced.
>>5328Spamming like a faggot to kill threads is literally GR3
>Do not spam, .... and have some respect for board topicality and posting quality.
>>5364You can "respectfully" post crap. Just act like you're clueless of doing any harm. It's the exact modus operandi of any troll.
>>5373Oh, you think it's going to be business as usual?
>>5377It's already happening:
>>5428 →
>>4974nhnb has noposts. just make poner and poner sfw jesus, i dont want to get fired for looking at pony during breaks.
>>5512So bring attention to it on /qa/ and report it. I already made my case