>>374052 Excellent, going to get things together for tonight. >even with that non-pony OP pic. Sorry friend, I have not saved any pone in quite some time.
This debate reminded me how much I actually love political chaos, pissing contests, meme wars and bullshittery. It's going to be an interesting four months, Anons. Let the games begin.
>THE IDEA! THE IDEA! THE IDEA! THE IDEA! THE IDEA! THE IDEA! THE IDEA! THE IDEA! THE IDEA! THE IDEA! THE IDEA! THE IDEA! THE IDEA! THE IDEA! THE IDEA! THE IDEA! THE IDEA! THE IDEA! THE IDEA! THE IDEA!
I can't believe it, they're seriously considering making their candidate step down four months before the debate. Do they think they have a better shot with fucking Harris?
>In text messages with POLITICO, Democrats expressed confusion and concern as they watched the first minutes of the event. One former Biden White House and campaign aide called it “terrible,” adding that they have had to ask themselves over and over “What did he just say? This is crazy.”
>Another veteran Democratic operative texted, “Biden seems to have needed a few minutes to warm up. I wonder if the lack of an audience was the right decision. And poor guy needs a tea. Maybe a whiskey.”
>Jay Surdukowski, an attorney and Democratic activist from New Hampshire who co-chaired Martin O’Malley’s 2016 presidential campaign in the state, said, “Biden is toast — calling it now.”
>Biden’s rambling answers provided Trump multiple opportunities to jump in with retorts. At one point, after an answer ostensibly on immigration, Trump said, “I don’t know what he said at the end there. I don’t think he knows what he said.”
>>374111 >push gavin newsom forward? It's too late for that. All the money they had was spent on making Biden look good, and he undid four years of campaigning in less than 90 minutes. Anything they do to replace him is going to make them look like idiots. Infighting and cannibalization accomplishes nothing, but at the same time they know that Americans aren't being fooled that Biden is even barely competent this time.
>>374112 >It's too late for that. All the money they had was spent on making Biden look good, and he undid four years of campaigning in less than 90 minutes. It was very entertaining though. >Anything they do to replace him is going to make them look like idiots. Agreed, its over for them this time. I'm not looking forward to zion don's second term though.
Biden: >I wasn't going to run again if it weren't for him threatening democracy! Trump: >I wasn't going to run again if it weren't for him being such a terrible president! Who do these egotistical clowns think that they're fooling with this bullshit?
I still think this was planned and the dems were always going to swap out Biden to make his replacement look better. I’d love to be proven wrong, though
>>374128 We should have gotten Jimble, he’d set this country straight
>meanwhile "experts" say If it was only stutters as his unsure walking, going stairs up but needs assistance to go down, staring into emptiness/ stopping having small motions and freezing is as dementia as it gets, only thing that kept him going even that well in debate was whatever drug cocktail they used. Also one thing that i started to wonder is that if he had hidden inner ear speaker or something.
I'm always horrifyingly impressed how differently these faggots view reality. They seem genuinely convinced that Biden is healthy and sane and Trump motherfucking strangles kittens or something. Such things would drive me to drink if I wasn't such a teetotaler.
Kamala Harris' camp is mad that Newsom and Whitmer are being floated as replacements over her >After President Joe Biden's widely panned debate performance against former President Donald Trump, Vice President Kamala Harris emerged as perhaps the president's most forceful advocate.
>Harris, who has enjoyed a strong governing relationship with Biden, is seen by many as a top successor to the president should he exit the presidential race.
>But some of Harris' allies are frustrated that Democratic figures like California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer are being touted more frequently than the vice president as potential Biden replacements in many circles, according to Politico.
>"The fact that people keep coming back to this is so offensive to so many of us," an unnamed Harris ally told the publication. "They still don't get that the message you're saying to people, to this Democratic Party, is, we prefer a white person."
>Another ally told Politico: "If they think they are going to get through South Carolina bashing an effective and qualified Black woman vice president — their instincts are as bad as I thought they were."
>Harris ran for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination, and there were high hopes for her campaign among many lawmakers and voters. But even after gaining traction following a primary debate where she skewered Biden over comments he made regarding his work with pro-segregationist lawmakers, her campaign faltered.
>Her eventual selection as Biden's running mate was praised by many Democrats — especially among Black voters in the party — which only strengthened after she was elected as vice president.
>But throughout much of her tenure, Harris has been dogged by low approval ratings alongside Biden. During her first two years in office, the coronavirus and a 50-50 Senate largely kept her in Washington, as she was needed to break ties on important votes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AIfH4YMbgKg This is basically irrelevant in comparison, but in the third congressional district for South Carolina Sheri Biggs edged out Mark Burns with only a ~1000 vote difference. Unfortunately S.C. politics is deeply corrupt and massive Democrat donors were supporting Biggs through donations and hate ads against Burns. >Peace through strength >Calling out the fag agenda I like the nigger firebrand pastor, I wish he won.
What is this "Project 25" conspiracy theory these leftists keep talking about? Have they convinced themselves that Trump will ban the internet, or something?
>>374212 It's supposedly the plan for what Republicans, lobbyists and donors want to do once Trump gets elected: it's basically a wishlist of conservative goals, some of which might actually be feasible. I think there's a website for it. The media has been talking about it a lot to scare Democrats into voting.
>Oh yeah lol, he's been brain damaged for a year and a half minimum >No we didn't feel it was necessary to tell the American people this until it was impossible to hide, why do you ask?
>>374258 I almost feel sorry for CNN (never thought I would say that). They legit tried their best to present the debate in an impartial manner, and now Democrats are blaming them for presenting their demented corpse of a president at face value.
I decided to watch the debate today with a friend in celebration of the 4th, and we agreed on a rule where we would drink every time Biden was slackjawed on camera, we'd drink. We had to stop at 50 and we lost count at 55 lmao