>The gist:
The Americans with Disabilities act prohib8ts any non-medical peraonnel from inquiring into a person's medical status. As such, a person can claim to be autistic - or some other neuro-atypical condition - with impugnity
>The Adversary:
Progressives, with emphasis on trans, non-binary, etc (the alphabet community).
>The plan:
Refuse to use precerred-gender pronouns under any circumstance. If challenged, the idea is to claim:
>I have autism (or wtfe) and am incapable of lying.
This would also justify an extreme lack of empathy toward the target(s).
Lather, rinse, repeat.
It's a new idea AFAIK, but it would potentiate new and exciting levels of trolling, shitposting, and overt defiance of the trans/etc community/movement/agenda.
It's basically the next step past the "I identify as an attack helicopter" meme from previous years, and seemingly would apply to online communication in addition to in person.
With enough traction, the idea can be presented to /pol/ and beyond for integration and implementation.
If the legal protections are all actionably in place, this could present an opportunity to move against twitter, facebook, and who knows where else.
I welcome any thoughts, discussion, questions, or ideas ITT.
/mlpol/ - My Little Politics
Archived thread
File (): 13536A1E36E864C6830B312429E0CDC6-33466.jpg (32.7 KB, 635x336, 1489181842589.jpg)
>>346263
>Refuse to use precerred-gender pronouns under any circumstance.
Why to play their game at all?
Just move out from academia and other madhouses, problem solved.
>Refuse to use precerred-gender pronouns under any circumstance.
Why to play their game at all?
Just move out from academia and other madhouses, problem solved.
>>346264
Not everyone is in academia, self included. The point is to enable anons to reclaim ground from both progressives and complicit online forims (again, facebook and twitter would be the ultimate goal) and form a front of resistance against and pursuit of the trans/nonbinary agenda.
If Facebook or Twitter starts banning people 'for abuse' of using the correct-gender pronouns, it can be leveraged as discrimination against a marginalized community (autists), and effectively hoist them by their own petard.
Not everyone is in academia, self included. The point is to enable anons to reclaim ground from both progressives and complicit online forims (again, facebook and twitter would be the ultimate goal) and form a front of resistance against and pursuit of the trans/nonbinary agenda.
If Facebook or Twitter starts banning people 'for abuse' of using the correct-gender pronouns, it can be leveraged as discrimination against a marginalized community (autists), and effectively hoist them by their own petard.
>>346265
>The point is to enable anons to reclaim ground from both progressives and complicit online forims (again, facebook and twitter would be the ultimate goal)
I disagree, what you propose is to play a rigged game where the jews dominate and have the upper nose.
Triggering the commies is fine and fun, playing on the enemy's field is not. And giving a long look to the strategic game, pronouns apply only to deranged minds and not worthy of anon's attention. Now the game is up a couple of notches and it is about to erode the very fabric that gives life to the commies: a never ending flow of money backed by adversarial gunmen.
>The point is to enable anons to reclaim ground from both progressives and complicit online forims (again, facebook and twitter would be the ultimate goal)
I disagree, what you propose is to play a rigged game where the jews dominate and have the upper nose.
Triggering the commies is fine and fun, playing on the enemy's field is not. And giving a long look to the strategic game, pronouns apply only to deranged minds and not worthy of anon's attention. Now the game is up a couple of notches and it is about to erode the very fabric that gives life to the commies: a never ending flow of money backed by adversarial gunmen.
>>346266
And in what way will the jews dominate and have the upper 'nose'? Until a diagnosis of autism can be confirmed FALSE, there is legal recourse to any disciplinary action, especially if there are multiples of people involved.
The overall goal is to:
1. Normalize that preferred pronouns are a lie, as is the idea of self-identification, and that there is 'legitimate' grounds to push back. Even among normalfags, there is a clear majority in opposition to the trans agenda, but as is usually the case, conservatives and even moderates are more... passive in their resistance to increasingly bat-shit pushes by the trans movement.
If normalfags realize that all that is needed to insulate one's self against repercussions is to claim to be autistic (hell, it doesnt even NEED to be legit, it can be "I identify as autistic"!), I imagine it wouldnt be too hard to get people on board (I dont mean from the board). Then it's a matter of gaining momentum.
2. As momentum/numbers increase to a certain threshold, then it would be time to move on Twitter and/or Facebook. In this leg, the POINT is to goad whatever site into taking disciplinary action, and with sufficient bans, a class action suit could be developed.
Anon, I appreciate if you dont like the idea, that's fine; it's just an idea at the moment.
Bit try not to let your fear of the jews cloud your judgement.
And in what way will the jews dominate and have the upper 'nose'? Until a diagnosis of autism can be confirmed FALSE, there is legal recourse to any disciplinary action, especially if there are multiples of people involved.
The overall goal is to:
1. Normalize that preferred pronouns are a lie, as is the idea of self-identification, and that there is 'legitimate' grounds to push back. Even among normalfags, there is a clear majority in opposition to the trans agenda, but as is usually the case, conservatives and even moderates are more... passive in their resistance to increasingly bat-shit pushes by the trans movement.
If normalfags realize that all that is needed to insulate one's self against repercussions is to claim to be autistic (hell, it doesnt even NEED to be legit, it can be "I identify as autistic"!), I imagine it wouldnt be too hard to get people on board (I dont mean from the board). Then it's a matter of gaining momentum.
2. As momentum/numbers increase to a certain threshold, then it would be time to move on Twitter and/or Facebook. In this leg, the POINT is to goad whatever site into taking disciplinary action, and with sufficient bans, a class action suit could be developed.
Anon, I appreciate if you dont like the idea, that's fine; it's just an idea at the moment.
Bit try not to let your fear of the jews cloud your judgement.
File (): C3AC06711B2A32ACF08143D7261CD7D1-261735.png (255.6 KB, 462x536, 79fset97.png)
>>346276
Is that a not a true scotsman argument?
Autism is a spectrum, and one quite well known for a lack of empathy. Ergo, it doesnt matter WHY one is not empathetic.
Is that a not a true scotsman argument?
Autism is a spectrum, and one quite well known for a lack of empathy. Ergo, it doesnt matter WHY one is not empathetic.
File (): D75F9C49CE665263E892631CF1CE6D77-49905.jpg (48.7 KB, 828x1188, the distraction.jpeg)
File (): E0B7B20EFF534395708EEF695E2E3D09-12293124.mp4 (11.7 MB, Resolution:1280x720 Length:00:00:50, the root.mp4) [play once] [loop]
>>346275
>refer to the initial statement.
Dear OP, the pronouns stuff is not amusing anymore and arguing with mentally ill sodomites is a waste.
We should focus on the root cause of that satanism.
>refer to the initial statement.
Dear OP, the pronouns stuff is not amusing anymore and arguing with mentally ill sodomites is a waste.
We should focus on the root cause of that satanism.
>>346301
It's not about fun (though there's PLENTY more fun to be had), its about changing the zeitgeist. People are TEEMING with the desire to stop going along with trans shit, but people are sheep; they need others to lead the way, establish thresholds, and make (remake, in this case) it acceptable to push back. And this is a trend that coukd eventually reach further than the trans movement.
Once it's decidedly acceptable (again) to be honest with/about all this gender bullshit and not be maligned as hateful wtfe, that opens the door for similar mental processes. Maybe it's NOT hateful to observe crime statistics by race.
In order to open the social mind to the fallibility of ALL bullshit ideologies and such, you have to be willing to participate in the changing of minds on an individual's basis.
Its a meme anon; its like Let's Go Brandon
It's not about fun (though there's PLENTY more fun to be had), its about changing the zeitgeist. People are TEEMING with the desire to stop going along with trans shit, but people are sheep; they need others to lead the way, establish thresholds, and make (remake, in this case) it acceptable to push back. And this is a trend that coukd eventually reach further than the trans movement.
Once it's decidedly acceptable (again) to be honest with/about all this gender bullshit and not be maligned as hateful wtfe, that opens the door for similar mental processes. Maybe it's NOT hateful to observe crime statistics by race.
In order to open the social mind to the fallibility of ALL bullshit ideologies and such, you have to be willing to participate in the changing of minds on an individual's basis.
Its a meme anon; its like Let's Go Brandon
File (): E831EA4EAC7F39D6C2F4F4A6FF8BDB5B-259725.png (253.6 KB, 627x354, 1433370620047.png)
>>346265
>effectively hoiste them by their own petard
they are literally racist against white skin color and yet they haven't been canceled retard. Anything they do is clandestine, anything you do is evil. Anything they wrote down that you can point to wont matter or count.
>effectively hoiste them by their own petard
they are literally racist against white skin color and yet they haven't been canceled retard. Anything they do is clandestine, anything you do is evil. Anything they wrote down that you can point to wont matter or count.
14 replies | 6 files | 8 UUIDs | Archived