>>235891It's a serious trade off. A centralized organization has discipline but it can be easily led astray or destroyed by the arrest/assassination of its command structure (see the deaths of George Lincoln Rockwell and Dr. Pierce) or co-opted by immoral/controlled leaders (as with Matt Heimbach and Richard Spencer). On the other hand, a decentralized organization can never account for all members and is therefore susceptible to disinformation or lone-wolf discrediting. Also, regardless of its nature it WILL be ignored, infiltrated, and attacked if it is in open meatspace, whereas left-wing orgs don't suffer the same consequences.
>>235894I see this as the most effective tactic. I'd go for a two-pronged approach: open and spontaneous activities and covert planned activities. Open activities should be exclusively those which are redpilling yet innocuous at face value, such as "It's OK to be white," "Stop sexualizing children," etc. Come up with ones that have comedic takes too such that memery is possible. The goal is to be able to spread ideas as widely as possible without triggering most normies and with minimal risk to oneself (so long as appropriate precautions are taken), and also to be able to easily identify enemy psy-ops (like they tried with "It's OK to kill kikes").
Covert activities involve intelligence gathering, internal disruption of opponents and distribution of resources for further activities. By its nature this means getting people you know and trust in meatspace and setting up "cells." Your peers should set up their own cells such that no one knows everyone else and have codenames; proof of membership should be something nearly exclusive and obscure yet apparently innocuous. Meetings should be in windowless spaces without any electronics nearby. Any sort of electronic communication should be considered compromised by its nature and use of more traditional, elaborate codes in apparently innocuous messages is the only method. You should separate this "hidden life" from your business/personal/political lives; for instance, just as you wouldn't mention politics in business you wouldn't mention the org in friendly political discussions (the goal being to redpill people and establish their trustworthiness before letting them in). The long-term goal is to establish an anti-cabal or anti-Cathedral with like-minded people in different circles, capable of orchestrating happenings like professional intelligence agencies and Jews do. By its nature whether something like that exists can't be openly known on Chans, so it is the responsibility of intelligent anons (particularly those who are relatively well-to-do and well-connected).
>>235912>>235968See
>>234190 →I used to hope that intellectual leadership in nationalism/traditionalism and austro-libertarianism would join forces. However, I can see that can never be the case, simply because libertarians with significant followings have too much to lose by any sort of connection with race realists (see the controversy when HHH, himself already considered radical, wrote the preface for
White, Right, and Libertarian), and race realists are frustrated by that silence. Nonetheless, that doesn't stop me from hoping the two movements will fuse, simply because it's inevitable. In terms of practical policies austro-libertarians are nearly identical with white nationalists, and there is a great deal of conformity with theory as well. However, while still marginal it's a much larger and growing movement in the open and it is not incessantly attacked by the mainstream (yet). Therefore, if you want to redpill people I recommend the following course of action:
Join/infiltrate (right-wing) libertarian organizations, regardless of your own affiliationBy rubbing shoulders with them you're highly likely to redpill them, much more likely than other people. Libertarians tend to become race-realists over time, even if they don't necessarily voice it (the so-called pipeline) and there is a wealth of literature that promotes this viewpoint. They are also generally traditionalists and Christians and are already low-key redpilled. Also, we can learn some things from the libertarian movement as well, as it has grown from essentially nothing over forty years. Agorism (which memes essentially are a part of) in particular is a way to get around ever-growing restrictions. In the short-run we are all anarchists and we need to think like anarchists.