ϟϟ Your one-stop-shop for every redpill known to /pol/ ϟϟ
Thread for discussion of the Jewish Question, Race Realism, Anti-Communism, the Aryan Ideal, Traditionalism, Racial Nationalism, and Racial Identity Movements.
>>233221 /pol/ generals are different than /mlp/ generals. /pol/ generals are the last standing cathedrals in bombed city. /mlp/ generals are sterile and don't produce new content.
>>233222 But any generals segregates anons and makes namefagging much more prominent. I'm pretty sure the early rules say threads (Like the Aryanne thread) are allowed, just not generals (Except /sg/ and Anonfilly since they are both pretty chill)
>>233221 >>233222Checked >>233227 >>233232 >>233250 The general reception from staff so far has vacillated from meh to neat with a smiley face. So far, no one has objections to it
>>233221 We have a few threads that are generals already, they're just not called that. Anonfilly, Syria General, Horse Pussy, Garbage Can, Random News, Aryanne Thread, Luftkrieg, Fluttershy Thread, Awoo News, etc. The rule was implemented to prevent the saturation of generals endemic of /mlp/ and the inanity of /ptg/ on /pol/ with the understanding that 4chan's mods would do fuck all to prevent either of those things. That's not an argument for abolishing the rule, or even relaxing the strictness of it, I don't know, I don't think there's enough activity here that it even matters either way.
>>233251 I think generals for ideologies is bad because people won't go outside them or be encouraged to discuss with other ideologies. Instead they will just circle jerk each other. But I don't think we have enough people for it to matter. I would like to point out that it would seem like poor moderation if in the future, generals became more common and someone "arbitrarily" decided that some/all generals should be banned because the "general cancer" threshold has been reached.
>>233274 Let's take the first step to fixing that, then:
NatSocs, what policies did NatSoc Germany have that you personally disagree with and wish would have been different? I mean civil policies, not military strategies.
>>233276 >what policies did NatSoc Germany have that you personally disagree with You will get a lot more feedback if the question is flipped to what the faggots agree with.
>>233276 I don't even know what I am anymore. But frankly, despite being a massive degenerate, I agree with the anti-degeneracy pushes, book-burning, anti-communism, and the idea of loaning interest-free to white families based on how many children they have. All those are a great start in combating the white genocide, and in restoring order in general. I also like the banning of kosher slaughter and other kike/muzzie practices that act counter to Christian, secular, and pagan norms most valued across the West.
I don't have much problem, if any, with the civil policies of Germany. The creation of a new non-private-central-bank currency was probably the most important of their economic policies, and even if it's not as stable as a currency based on objective value like gold, I would prefer it to muh petro dollar.
I can't wait for Democrats to Hate Taylor Swift over the color of her skin after she shills for them... When she realizes her efforts to [coddle the angry left] are futile and that the Left only seeks to destroy /us/, she will return to /our/ team. She will be humiliated and angry. We can only award her amnesty if she "Proves" herself...
>>234635 The best way to prevent degeneracy is to stick to the Bible. The Bible reveals Hashem's will: G-d loves us and wants us to avoid such degenerate behaviours as homosexuality, pornography, and anti-Semitism. Judaism is the light of the world and will guide us toward the truth. It is through a spinoff of Judaism (Christianity) that the Roman Empire learned to reject pederasty and accept Christ. The White man would be nothing without Judaism! Accept the light of Judaism instead of saying ignorant things like "ban kosher slaughter"!
>>241822 I would like to formally submit a request for someone who can actually draw well to draw that pony with the proportions and facial structure matched exactly, with no tail and the Jewtie mark on the chest. I am morbidly curious what it will look like.
>>241822 >let's stick it to the jews hy being gay pedos just like the based romans! You're fucking retarded. You've accepted kike propaganda as fact and decided to kive your life in accordance with it. Faggotry was looked down on in most periods of Hellenic civilization, and even when it wasn't it wasn't sime big "homosexual" lifestyle like the AIDSboys want you to have today. Are you even of Greek or Italian descent? Most Americans are of Germanic or Celtic descent, and those cultures were known to put faggots to death even before Christianity. So quit being a faggot, faggot.
>>249551 >You've accepted kike propaganda as fact Actually, I believe >>241822 is indeed a kike. Anyone deforming the name of GOD in written form is a kike, and this custom goes still beyond. I heard that Jews are taught about their "divinity" and "chosenness" from early age and because of it, they avoid by all possible means that gentiles call them Jews or read that word in a negative paragraph, so, they also deform it as "Joos" and similar. In the same fashion, they defined the terminology to be used when they are criticized as antisemitic instead of anti-Jew or anti-Judaism.
>>249551 >>249556 I'm 200% sure he's shitposting. I don't think he actually believes it since he has a badly drawn kike horse with a menorah and all the clearest tell-tale signs of Judaism in his post.
>>250217 Don't keep your money in bank accounts when you can avoid it, try carrying out exchanges in metal or crypto instead of paper when possible, pay as little in taxes as you can without getting arrested.
>>250234 actually, there were instances where communist governments were set up within germany. across the country one would find that the communists were in essence engaging in full-on civil war against the government.
>>243294 Yup, the Jews were and are complaining that the Germans burnt their books, but as usual the Jews accuse their victims of the same crimes committed by themselves.
>>255773 Kek, the spoiler spoils the short film. It's worth every second including the credits. >In 2043 only Obengruppen Fuehrer Fascifist can defeat the Last Britain Freemason Tranny. Thank you for posting this here.
Why do you follow intellectually dead ideology? What is the national interests and who will define it? What the fuck is nation itself? What does it means to belong to ${nation-name}? >Literally socialism in the name Eww!
>>256656 >Why do you follow intellectually dead ideology? The ideology has never died- unlike socialism, it was never given a real shot. It took the combined might of the entire world to kill it. The few years it ran, and what it did in prewar Germany, are perfect evidence to it's potential. >What is the national interests and who will define it? That is the one potentially problematic point- in general, the national interest is ensuring that whatever can be done to strengthen the nation's international position and protect the well-being of the people is secured. >What the fuck is nation itself? What does it means to belong to ${nation-name}? The nation is the collected spirit of the people. It is an extension of the clan- where every subject is intrinsically interested in the well-being of their neighbors, because they share the same blood, the same history, and the same future. >Literally socialism in the name If you think that NatSoc 'socialism' is like the kind we are familiar with today you are retarded. 'Socialism' is a tool to to establish Communism, to eliminate races, promote internationalism, and protect the (((international banker))). National Socialism fulfills the desire of the state- it ensures that industries crucial to the state, industries which are necessary to secure the well being of the citizenry, are managed. Steel mills, military production, mass industry... the state places strict controls on these too limit the potential of international corruption. Unlike socialism, NatSoc protects private property. Unlike socialism, NatSoc protects individual industry- because NatSoc is inherently based on the scientific difference between peoples. The small businessman, the craftsman, the farmer, the inventor- they are free to exercise innovation.
>>256656 "'Socialist' I define from the word 'social; meaning in the main ‘social equity’. A Socialist is one who serves the common good without giving up his individuality or personality or the product of his personal efficiency. Our adopted term 'Socialist' has nothing to do with Marxian Socialism. Marxism is anti-property; true socialism is not. Marxism places no value on the individual, or individual effort, of efficiency; true Socialism values the individual and encourages him in individual efficiency, at the same time holding that his interests as an individual must be in consonance with those of the community. All great inventions, discoveries, achievements were first the product of an individual brain. It is charged against me that I am against property, that I am an atheist. Both charges are false." - Adolf
How long will nunazis pretend they're making any difference? White genocide and the jews will be stopped if we just talk online and maaaaaake mememes!!!!!!!! >>241822 Especially if we worship jews like Rabbi Yeshua, Jewsus Christ!
>>267099 >>267103 I tested and I can post multiple images without problems. Do you get any error messages that might help in tracking down the reason you aren't able to do it?
>„Hier spricht der Sender Werwolf! Sender der deutschen Freiheitsbewegung in den vom Feind besetzten Gebieten! Das Oberkommando der Feinde hat über die besetzten Gebiete Ausgangsverbot verhängt. Dieses Verbot gilt nicht für uns Werwölfe. Auf vertrauten Wegen sind wir auch im Dunklen zusammen. Vier Jahre lang sind unsere Feinde in der Nacht gekommen, um mit ihren Mordmaschinen den Tod über unsere Heimat auszusäen. Jetzt sind ihre Soldaten gekommen, um ihre Aussaat zu ernten. Aber nun gehen wir in der Nacht aus und säen den Samen der Freiheit.“ — Sender Werwolf, Frühjahr 1945
---------------
>"This is the werewolf channel! Broadcast of the German freedom movement in the areas occupied by the enemy! The high command of the enemies has imposed a ban on the occupied territories. This prohibition does not apply to us werewolves. In familiar ways we are also together in the dark. For four years our enemies have come in the night to sow death over our homeland with their killing machines. Now their soldiers have come to reap their sowing. But now we go out in the night and sow the seed of freedom."- Werewolf broadcast, Spring 1945
nice thread. it's been ages since i lurked mlpol.net .. i remember some admins were anti-AH for some reason, or am i mixing my memories with the mlpol discord server admins/mods....? (btw that place was a pile of lefty spies shit)
is there any rundown about what happened lately here and wich admins were kicked for being not right wing leaning ones etc? back then this place was seen by RW as a containment board/page run by crypto lefties. But i never lost the faith in some admins that i see are still here.
>>280712 >>280713 I knew the discord servers calling themselves "The official /mlpol/ discord server" were full of shit, but jesus christ. They've only gotten more obvious since I was muted on them and insulted for not liking Glimmer, causing me to leave in disgust and bitch about it here. Still, holy shit. Glimmer's just a badly-written character on a TV show that stopped being good years ago. Their reaction (silencing and lecturing the thoughtcriminal) was what tipped me off to how subverted those servers are. Leftists are anti-human, anti-reason, anti-past, and anti-future. It's impossible to have an honest discussion with leftists because they don't have souls or standards or any honest desire to make the world a better place. It's no secret that leftism is the Epstein, Winestain, and Sheckelstein side of their war. They continue to be leftists because nothing their side has done makes them want to distance themselves from it. They love what leftists do to non-leftists, they see it as "the strong" (those skilled in lying and exploiting the mercy and tolerance of others) treating the weak as they deserve. They gloat about wanting to kill you and rape your daughters. They want you to let them kill you, and if you try reasoning with them they will spit in your face and laugh at you for thinking human ways work on inhuman beasts. They are just spite and weakness and evil encouraged and protected and weaponized by the jew, and any society that wants to survive needs to stop the left from destroying its future. Recognizing communism, liberalism, and leftism as mental disorders that should land you in straight-jackets and padded rooms, where you can be kept from hurting yourself or others or society on the streets or on TV or at the voting booths... that's the peaceful solution to the leftist problem. The faster and cheaper solution is to rev up those helicopters for the commies, and everyjew responsible for the existence of commies. Either way, nobody's going to give us permission to stop communism.
Also, quick note: Whether you like NatSoc or not, anyone with a brain can see it's a better alternative to what we're living under right now. >"b-b-but it treats the jews and darkies meanly!" So? Wanting an ethnically diverse society is NOT a virtue. Wanting an ideologically-diverse society isn't something to be proud of if you think evil ideologies like leftism have a place in society. Foreigners love to say the white man isn't doing enough for them, but what have the foreigners done for the white man? What great works of literature have been made by the supposedly-existent smart blacks, to make up for the illiteracy of most of their kind? Can anyone name some scientific achievements or great inventions made by women or blacks or black women that benefited all of mankind? Where are the thuggish black rioters and where's their desire to smash shit up when the white man is protesting against bombistani child-trafficking rape rings? What return has the first world gained from their investments into the third world?
>>280712 Nice to know. >>280713 I swear that if we showed the sort of shit that goes on in the shit sword servers to pretty much anyone in the past they would say that it is worse than a nightmare, imagine how they would react, first there would be disbelief of the ridiculousness that goes on in their shit rings then despair after realizing that it is real then righteous fury of how backwards and disgraceful these absolute faggots really are >>280717 They are below shit, with a piece of shit you don't want to step on it because you don't want to violate it's NAP but with a commie cunt you WANT to slam your SS boot down on them. >>280718 A Negro or a in charge is like deciding that a rat has the authority to order you around because the rat cannot survive without you so the rat tries to guilt trip you into a sort of mind fuck but the rat will only win you over if you have a soft brain.
>>280721 True. A truly free society is meant to give good men the freedom to be good to themselves and others without fear of out-of-touch born-powerful political tyrants or barbarians trying to destroy it from outside or cancers trying to destroy it from within. A good society can create times so good, it could become necessary for the government to fund public service announcements that tell the kids and teenagers of a high-trust society to "NEVER get into the cars of strange unknown men because they're probably gay perverts". But such openness and naivete and exploitability only comes if a good society is stupid enough to let its children forget there is evil in the world and good needs to be protected from it with good deeds.
I know in several countries, showing of the swastika is illegal, does that apply for Aryanne too? I imagine sitting in court and they show the evidence they have against me and show ponies. lol i just can't resist here cuteness.
Heres my problem with centrally planned communist and socialist economies: they invariably concentrate all economic and political power into the hands of small group of state officials inevitably corrupted by absolute power.
>>289530 >Heres my problem with centrally planned communist and socialist economies: they invariably concentrate all economic and political power into the hands of small group of state officials inevitably corrupted by absolute power. There are a couple assumptions in this statement that I take issue with: >1. Socialism implies a centrally planned economy >2. Power corrupts
The former issue seems largely to stem from people erroneously believing that Communism and Socialism are synonymous. I don't really follow Communist ideology, but I would honestly be surprised if many of them still actually advocate a completely centrally planned economy. This isn't to say that a National Socialist government wouldn't interfere with the nation's economy: the mere existence of a state has economic implications, a state cannot operate without interfering in the economy. The Socialist ideal for the National Socialist is to protect the freedom and property of the individual, but at the same time work in the interest of the nation-folk. Central planning would be detrimental to both of those ends: price controls damage the value of goods and property, a planned economy will be less efficient on all fronts than a price-controlled one, and a price controls tend to stifle innovation. Of course, the economic well being of the nation is not the only good; quality of life is what a Socialist government ought to be looking to optimize, of which how big of a television you have in your living room is only a part.
While I don't completely discount the idea that power can corrupt individuals, I think a more accurate frame to view the issue of corruption and power is that corrupt individuals tend to seek power. I'm certainly no historian, but I am confident that my thesis would be supported by historical analysis. The distinction is important because the framing of the issue of corruption fundamentally changes how solutions are evaluated. Saying that "power corrupts" diminishes the perceived agency of the corrupt individuals -- "anyone in that position would have done the same". The solution in this case would be to dilute the amount of power any official can hold. However, if we assume the latter view -- that the persons put themselves in a powerful position because they were corrupt -- this solution will exacerbate rather than solve the fundamental problem. Honest politicians will see official positions as useless to the purposes of solving problems, the ambitious will seek to manipulate officials rather than hold an official position, and people who may have been more resilient to manipulation won't bother to seek out an official position; the officials will be less honest and more easily manipulated by unelected forces every election cycle. The solution if you assume that the corrupt seek power rather than power being a corrupting force is to be more discriminatory in determining whom should hold power, where diluting the power necessarily makes the process less discriminating.
>>298913 That might be the worst kind of retardation I have ever seen. But now that I took the bullet, you fags don't have to. Imagine thinking that national socialists want to kill everyone who ever looked at porn. Or that they would want to nuke half of the world, condemning the whole planet, in a similar fashion to the Samson option. I'm not joking, it's all in there. (Still don't unpack the whole thing out of morbid curiosity though, just open the files from the archive one by one if you must. Better yet, just don't.) This is either a very intricate shitpost, or was uploaded solely so that Anon could point to it and go >see goyim, this is what the ebil nazis want! It's rather degenerate either way.
But just so I don't waste a post bitching about some retard, I guess I'll point out that ecology was, in fact a main concern of the NSDAP way back when. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_welfare_in_Nazi_Germany Compare and contrast with my edgy nuke the world and fuck nature "orders". And as for the looking at porn part, this site uses lewd pones as one its main defensive measures, so that one just refutes itself.
>>298913 Motherfucking tryhard shill jew cuck that is the stupidest fucking name I've ever seen. Nazis are just whites who want the jews to stop being evil.
>>298913 do not download or open an Office file. Office files can contain malicious macros or exploits. if you want to post a text file that you have written, just post a plain .txt file as .txt files don't contain metadata.
>>299453 >>299454 >Nazis are just whites who want the jews to stop being evil. this
Spain; February 13, 2021. Isabel Peralta; 18 years old - Spanish Nationalist and Falangist. She mentions the Spaniard "División Azul" (Blue Division) that fought on the Russian front side by side with the Wehrmacht.
>>301684 All that corruption is direct result of State policies specifically tailored to disintegrate social core values. For the local abettors don't look beyond than the lodges around, most are high ranking members. For the master minds, take a look to the hired psychopaths at the British Tavistock Institute.
>>301685 Would a system of government-assigned girlfriends/wives be a good idea if a nazi govt paired people up for optimal genetically healthy offspring?
>>301689 The Nazis actually tried doing that with the Lebensborn program, but there would be serious ethical implications if any program like that were to be done today. It may not even be legal if non-consensual sex of any nature would constitute sexual assault, though the Lebensborn program was conducted on a voluntary basis. Still, it would likely be unwise to start any kind of program that rips children away from their parents only for them to never be reunited again. Children in orphanages tend to not receive the same amount of attention their counterparts who stayed with their parents did.
>>233227 >>233232 I can understand a thread discussing the history of the Third Reich, but one that actively praises its “accomplishments” might not only violate “No Race Mixing”, but it might scare people away from /mlpol/ as a collective. Sure, big tech has grown very powerful and we might need an alternative to 4ch, but people may not want to use it if they see a bunch of Roman saluting, goose stepping, swastika-flying monsters.
>>302084 >but people may not want to use it if they see a bunch of Roman saluting, goose stepping, swastika-flying monsters. Your statement is a clear sign of unwanted visitors, newfag. The hoers porn thread needs more horsepussy.
>Lebensborn program >it would likely be unwise to start any kind of program that rips children away from their parents Not at all, babies were given in adoption to selected families to raise them as their own and with an improved genetic make up. It is a win-win situation for the child and the happy adoptive parents. Also the nation genetic pool is refined towards quality instead of random selection.
>>302084 You're on a bestiality board.. Swastikas aren't a very big concern.
>>302092 No one cares about your children as much as you do. Even the best adoptive parents are going to leave gaps only biological parents can fulfill. Who am I and where do I come from are fundamental questions any human should ask. "You were an unholy union of two people who didn't care for each other then gave you away to us" is not a good place for a child to grow up.
In the modern world you could run dating websites which match people up manually. There's lots of disabled ones which do the same thing today to match care needs. By default it works like okcupid with a fee to join, then some women in the office will also manually go through profiles of interviewed people and find suitable pairings for them. It's retard okcupid but the opposite could also work. A healthier option would be good strong communities with little movement between them so you grow up with your childhood sweetheart and marry her once she's ready for baby making.
>>302093 >No one cares about your children as much as you do. I agree with you, however Lebensborn is about genetics above all, and genetics is very important in the individual's character. But look it this way, in today' society, children suffer from the lack of a father to correct them and teach them, single women are a train wreck unable to rule themselves, leave alone to rein on a rebel teenager. So, I believe a patriarchal adoptive couple is far more suitable than a modern household with a single parent.
>>302097 I don't think you understand genetics very well anon. Your genetics are turned on and off by you and your parents life experience. If your genetic mother is anxious about her baby being adopted away from her close to birth her anxiety could turn on your anxiety genes in a way that gives you a panic disorder despite neither of your parents having one. It's not as simple as good genetics + good genetics = very good genetics. Even if we have perfect knowledge of genes, we don't have perfect knowledge of RNA and how it interacts with them. I can't remember the rodent's name any more but there is a type of rodent with nomadic males. They fuck and then move on leaving the mother to raise the children on her own. There is a gene which decides how the fetus's incubate inside the mother. If the female passes it on then the eggs don't attach to the womb wall as tightly, if the male passes it on they embed deeply and can cause infertility after the litter is born. The problem is it's the exact same gene from either parent. It's entirely identical but acts differently depending on which parent passed it onto the children/
http://www.schizophrenia.com/familyenv1.htm This is a very shallow but interesting article on explaining why selective breeding for traits doesn't work very well. It's extremely complex and even identical twins will have different genetic outcomes. You can breed big picture (Race, hair and eye colour) but small picture it's impossible with our current tech and possibly ever.
>>302101 >Don't be informed on a topic and have a discussion about it >Just post memes You should kill yourself and save us the trouble of putting up with your stupidity once and for all.
>>302092 But there are only so many nuns who can cater to the needs of the children there. It isn’t exactly like the children are 100% loved. If anything, they were hated because of their associations with Nazi Germany. >>302093 >You’re on a bestiality board Isn’t bestiality forbidden on this site because of the location it’s servers are in?
>>302084 Perhaps a system where you can apply to have the govt match you up with someone good for your genes and capacity to make a good family with numerous kids would work best if these genetically-healthy families were financially encouraged to have more children (To compensate for how the jew tries to make having kids and raising damn near impossibly costly for most unless the govt's helping you) while if the pairing turns bad other couples can be tried. The system should be designed so it's good for working-class men who don't have time to scour bars and nightclubs and countless other places for women when most are at home reading porn on their Kindles, and at the same time cannot be taken advantage of by women who want to ride the cock carousel without ever producing or raising good offspring.
>>305387 >Enjoying your soycialism yet, boomer? I think you are confusing the European collective "covenant" with the socialist version of judaism. They are not equivalent.
>>305387 Not their untrustworthy one, our trustworthy one. A nation of NatSocs dedicated to putting their race first would not tolerate corrupt self-interested rulers pulling bullshit like... I don't know, underground bidding wars on having the most fertile and beautiful women with the best genes assigned to them.
>>305389 Fuck your pigshit wording. What you ascribe is best called the Social Contract, which, hint: is not a stolen and rebranded kike-phrasing intended to program doublethink/wrongthink into a culture.
>>305391 Laughable nonsense. You are brain dead in beLIEving that a government outside of your direct input & control is capable of caring for the peons. After all you should just !!trust the plan!! Defending judaic styled slavery in this era? Oh, why, I don't know, why didn't your ancestors choose correctly, refuse the kikery, and keep their females from being jewed? Ahhhh, that's right: they were weak, just like you.