That is ridiculously short. Make that 30 days.
>>370255This is more of a thread for
>>>/qa/I agree though. 30 minutes is way too short. It should be indefinite so long as you have the password.
>>370256Not sure what you're getting at. This is a valid complaint, although on the wrong board.
>>370261>I agree though. 30 minutes is way too short. >It should be indefinite so long as you have the password.Absolutely not.
Being able to delete posts will cause that threads will lost logical sense.
It is the equivalent of to give a machine gun to a monkey.
>>370263>It is the equivalent of to give a machine gun to a monkey.What a retarded analogy.
>Being able to delete posts will cause that threads will lost logical sense.That's nothing that can't be fixed by asking a few questions.
Besides, sometimes Anons accidentally reveal personal information during the day and don't realize it until the time limit has passed, or make errors. I think Anons deserve to be able to withdraw their comments.
I think the best thing to ponder is what would make the synagogue-of-satan/"jews" the happiest, and then do the opposite.
My thought: Indefinite deletion is a security risk, and if an anon really does post their floppy peepee and regrets it later, they can always whinge to a mod and let the mod decide. Aren't the stallions here supposed to post while not drunk anyway?
>>370269>security riskWhat exactly is the security risk there?
>>370281Proving what boundaries? Proving them how?
>>370269When you cease being a pseudo-centrist fucktard that does nothing more than post shitty soycialist crybaby maymays and kvetch really loudly about
not being part of the Fifth Column, then you can talk. Until then: shut the fuck up.
>>370308Sorry, but no deletion allowed past the 30 minutes limit is a fair and generous offering IMO.
>>370312He didn't even mention post deletions, you retard.
>>370255Also, OP, if you have complaints, you're better off making threads on /qa/, since staff respond to new /qa/ threads within two days.