Ask them if they have buyers remorse voting for Biden.
Ask them "If a woman can identify as a man to become a man, can a Nazi identify as a libertarian to become a libertarian?"
>>310573>Why do liberals demand "muh source"
It's an attempt to discredit their opponent. They already made their minds and to debate them is a waste of time, except perhaps to ridiculize them.
>>310573>Why do liberals demand "muh source" on every simple fact that takes 2 seconds to search on the web?
Because, you're the one providing the information, so you need to cite your facts to prove that they exist and that you not pulling them out of your ass.<But muh search engines
Search engines change their results for practically every single person, so telling them to "Google it
" is a futile effort when they could put in the exact same search results you tell them to and get a completely different answer. That's in addition to the fact that search results do not account for sites that change addresses or go offline, which is why you should also go the extra mile and provide an archive, too.
That's also in addition to the fact that search results ARE NOT A SOURCE!
If that were true, you could just as easily type in "Did the Holohuax happen" and have millions of sites saying it did and use that as your "proof".
Arguing with liberals in honestly a waste of time. They only think in unexamined talking points and platitudes.>>310583>Ask them "If a woman can identify as a man to become a man, can a Nazi identify as a libertarian to become a libertarian?"
Most of them already think libertarians are Nazis, at least the principled ones who don't cuck for multiculturalism and other degenerate shit. Even (((Rothbard))) got these kind of attacks because he stuck to his principles and beliefs even when they put him at odds with the dogma of his co-ethnics.
You should have proof for your claims though. Dont fall into the same line as the left.
Having proof/sources for facts you cite in debates is just standard. An unsourced claim can never hold water.
It's true that having a few solid sources for your talking points is a pretty basic requirement. Even if you're not going around slapfighting with liberals online, it's good if you're trying to convince someone who's more open to what you're saying as well.
The real reason liberals so often throw out "muh source" though is because it's just a sleazy tactic to see if you have one on hand. If you don't, they think they can claim an easy victory up front. I think it's that simple.
They just hope to dismiss your arguments as unfounded. Never have I ever heard of a liberal changing their mind about anything because a proof was provided - it's always just a stall tactic to make more work for you that they won't even check.
Here's a fun test if you want to lose your hope on humanity even faster: When a liberal asks for source, ask them if they would believe your point if the source was provided. The end result will always be the same nevertheless, as no source whatsoever will be "reliable" enough, even if it was literally the homepage of their own organization.
The most basic way to win against a liberal is a statistic from an official government site. A news source from anywhere is going to do absolutely nothing. You need the hard data, immigration numbers, crime statistics, number of shootings per capita, etc. But just showing them an article of Fox News or something automatically loses them. That's all editorial.
FBI crime statistics are a personal favorite
How do you speedrun the 5 phases of redpill?
1. Haha wow feminists make shitty comics/games and hate what i love
2. Gamergate is proof gaming journalism is corrupt
3. Fuck divershitty hires
4. Fuck jews for inventing feminism
5. Jews are attacking the white race
>>311673>oy vey nigel nigel nigel reeee it's nigel everyone reeeeee
Learn another tune and read another book. If you're going to pretend gamergate isn't a good starting point for getting newfags out of the consoomer mindset and into wanting the jews stopped, that shows everyone your priorities.
I am Fucking tired of hearing about a fucking cringe movement that happened like 10 years ago. no one will know or care about anything. normies are too dumb or to nihilistic to wake up
Aw, you're tired of hearing about gamergate? It's "cringe"? Are you tired of amongus too? That must be real hard on your feelings.
I know hclegend/vril has narcissistic tendencies but come the fuck on. Jews kill innocents. Politics is bigger than your feelings.
>>311676>Jews kill innocents
Tell me something i don't know,retard. You think that doesn't make a bigger impact on me than Some retard screaming about how "Da ebil vidya games journalist are fucking stoopid whores then giving them 10/10"? Use your fucking brain.Our People are more important than anything on this evil fucking world we live on. You want to talk shit about vril being a narcissist? YOU are the biggest one on this site faggot.
And yes i do hate among us. it just as retarded as bringing up a Dead "Movement" that got nothing done except give the kikes the idea to go after sponsors. now every retard on the internet screams at sponsors and they shit their pants.So in fact Gaymer gape set everything back/
Do you really think whites gave kikes the idea to go after sponsors? Do you think jews haven't been doing that for decades? Wow.
Don't forget, for a game consoomer his media is everything and conservativism is unthinkable. Baby steps. You can't just rip someone out of the Matrix without preparation.