/mlpol/ - My Little Politics

Math is racist.
>Tucker: Finding the right answer is now 'problematic'
>Oregon education officials claim there is racism in mathematics; Libby Emmons joins 'Tucker Carlson Tonight' to react.
[YouTube] Tucker: Finding the right answer is now 'problematic' [Embed]

>Bronx educator claims she was fired after sharing Holocaust story, refusing ‘Wakanda’ salute
>A veteran Bronx superintendent once praised by Chancellor Richard Carranza for her successes in the classroom claims her career was derailed by his “equity” agenda — forcing her to take a demotion in a desperate bid to preserve her pension, according to a $150 million lawsuit.
>(((Karen Ames))), a 30-year Department of Education employee, says she was targeted by Carranza’s “Disrupt and Dismantle” campaign to oust or marginalize longtime employees because she is over 40, and Jewish.
>“The agenda of Chancellor Carranza and his senior leadership team was euphemistically touted as an ‘equity platform’ but in reality, it was a platform used to create gender, age, racial and ethnic divisions in the NYC School system,” she contends in her Manhattan Supreme Court lawsuit filed Friday.
>kikess burnt by her own creation and anti-White agenda
https://nypost.com/2021/02/20/nyc-educator-fired-after-sharing-holocaust-story-refusing-wakanda-salute/
I guess the jewish motto "I'm not White, I'm jewish"; didn't work this time.

>>301941
>boycott
8 Things You Can Do to Fight the System.

>>301974
I've been thinking, since there's both boycotts and buycotts nowadays, what about ads and anti-advertisements? Both conservatives and leftists have reasons not to buy from a store that employs sweatshops in Asia, and if you'll remember the left was the side that didn't like globalism in the 90s.

>>301941
Okay there's some right here in the thread. What about spreading them far and wide, would there be a way we could do that?

>>301987
There's potential.

>>301988
>What about spreading them far and wide, would there be a way we could do that?
Yes, but it depends how to present the idea to the fags.

>>302029
3 is an image for ants.

>>302035
This image is a few years old now. Could do with being updated.

>>301987
They don't work. Look at how many people say they will boycott marvel films and how many want to boycott games which still do extremely well. People don't care about ads online if they're not already blocking them. The only way it can work is if you do it locally and play up the "racism against whites" card. Other wise you're just pissing in the wind.

>>302030
Well if we're the smart Ubermenschen we claim to be then I figure we could find a way. You don't have to engage in corporate espionage, but right now corporate entities are pretty much untouchable, and that's because there's a one-way stream of information. They snap up all of it and broadcast only the most divisive material there is out there and keep people buying their shit.
As of now it's only "racist" if it hurts profits. Talk is cheap. We know they don't give a rat's ass about the common man, but how could a large number of other people wise up to that?

>>302035
Mmmm-MMMMMMMMMHHHh-mmmhmmmmm-mmmhhh-mmmm. Exactly what:
>>302046
says. That shit is from around 2010ACE. Kraft-Heinz is a fucking thing, and so are all the rest of banker whore selloffs.

I don't think money talks as much as it did in the past. You see these corps continually shoot themselves with assinine divisive shit, but they insist on losing revenue to maintain some virtuous image that convinces no one. I really think it's because these corps are getting guaranteed money from somewhere, probably rich kikes at the behest of certain government people.
A business-oriented guy concerned about making money is not gonna hold onto a doomed train driving off a cliff for no reason. Something is driving them to think that real business collapse is worth it for whatever it is they truely seek.

Interesting answers.

>>302078
Money hasn't talked since the internet came to exist. Markets are now so huge you can have an entire country boycott you and barely notice. The most effective way to be successful in silicon valley isn't to have a good technology or product, it's simply to start as many start ups as possible and have someone rich buy one off you. They're all abusing the stock market and printing fake money so it's meaningless to try and compete with them. Microsoft started this play book where any promising start up would be bought by them and crushed to stagnate tech. Now google does the same thing on a scale MS never dreamed of. It's no wonder Bill Gates is head corona retard with the way he's acted towards humanity in the past.

>>302082
>If I cut off my penis I will make the Jews afraid of me! I can pee in women's bathrooms and prove trannies are mentally ill!
>50 people reply telling you you're retarded
>LOOK AT ALL THESE SHILLS KEK! BRB GETTING SCISSORS XD

>>302078
It's probably got a lot to do with something like slash-and-burn economics when it comes to social institutions. Notice how all the universities are claiming to "run like a business" now, at least in the US. All these "too big to fail" corpos are putting out worse and worse products because they know if they say "white man bad" people will still buy it to own the cons.
Information is quickly becoming, if not already more valuable than money itself, whatever the corporations want certainly has its end in power, and we'd be the fool not to think that they care the utmost about their image right now. They're pumping all this cultural Marxist BS to divert the public's attention from the fact that the emperor has no clothing.

>>302083
Look buddy, you've made it known in at least two threads by now that you don't approve of any kind of memetic warfare. Message received. Now are you at least gonna step aside and let people decide for themselves or are you gonna sit there and nag at us like our moms? At least you could bring us tendies or a better idea ffs.

Canada.
>'White Student Alliance' prompts investigation at Edmonton high school
>Administrators at a south Edmonton high school are consulting with the Edmonton Police Service hate crimes unit as they investigate an online group that encourages local students to fight "Black supremacy."
>The "Scona White Student Alliance" calls on students at Strathcona High School to "rise up" and fight "racism against white people."
>Accounts for the group were established on various social media platforms this week, prompting concern from students, parents and school officials.
>Trisha Estabrooks, chair of the Edmonton Public School Board, described the posts as disappointing and disgusting.
>"It's blatantly racist," Estabrooks said during a news conference Tuesday. "It's rooted in fear. It's rooted in hate. All of those things are concerning."
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/white-student-alliance-racism-edmonton-strathcona-high-school-1.5915872
As usual, gaslighting and calling men with guns to intimidate and suppress dissent.

>Learning from Ants
An excerpt from:
https://internationalman.com/articles/learning-from-ants/

What is Cultural Marxism?
The Frankfurt School and Cultural Marxist philosophy which now controls Western intellectualism, politics, and culture. It was by design; it was created by an internationalist intelligentsia to eradicate Western values, social systems, and European racial groups in a pre-emptive attempt to spark global, communist (think liberal) revolution.

While you were distracted.

Curious, isn't it?

Boycott Globohomo.
>The war that we are in now is mostly an information war and economic war. Trying to organize our people in any meaningful way is risky. It has been shown time and time again that the FEDs will do everything in their power to stop Europeans from creating communities. This does not mean that all is lost.
>We have it within our power to end globalhomo within a few months, it would not be hard. The hard part would be getting enough people to do it. Simply stop buying their products. You don't need a new car, find one in the nickel adds. You don't need coke or oreos, or any of their processed poison. The products you must have can almost always be purchased used.
>The issue we face with simply boycotting Globe Corp is that we don't see any results at first, and we feel as though Coke could care less if we spend $2 with them today or we don't. But this strategy is death by a million cuts, and it would work.
>There is no downside to simply not buying from Globalhomo. If you simply must watch some movie or show, find a way to pirate it off the internet. Or, for your better mental health, simply don't watch it.
>Boycotting Globe Corp will save you money, improve your health, and improve your mind. Many of us are wanting a savior of some kind to do the heavy lifting, be it Trump, or the military, or the courts. The truth is they cant save us because our war is a cultural war. Cultural rot is Globe Corps weapon. And every individual must fight that war within his own home.
>The next time you say to yourself I will buy just one bag of oreos, or I will cancel Amazon Prime next month, STOP. You need to do it now, no more putting it off. You can be an example to others. Don't take the easy way, don't let the rotten culture sweep you away with it. Stand firm!
>Together we can become healthier better people, build our local businesses and communities, and hit our enemies the only place that really matters to them, their net income.
>How do you think open civil war in the streets will go if our side cant even stop watching Netflix, and eating poison? The way out is healthy living and spending your dollars wisely. It may be a bit hard at first but I promise it gets easier and it makes you a stronger man and family.
>Boycott Globe Corp till it is dead. Get out of the stock market and by a small plot of land. Grow your own food. Get into thrift stores and farmers markets. Revolt against the modern world. We owe it to our children and our ancestors. We can start today, and every day that passes we will become a bit stronger.
https://gab.com/VexedPartisan/posts/105842974057942700

A kind of disturbing chart of the stages of genocide, which seems to show us at about stage six if you assume in the US that Cabal’s infiltration of social media and business is the equivalent of government action in other countries.

>>303693
Correct, just as the das juden did to Germany and the Jewnited Estates from 1915ACE to 1917ACE.... then once more in 1933ACE.

>Communist Subversion | A Plan For Total World-Wide Control | Part 1
>Communist Subversion Part 1 provides a high level overview on the many layers to understanding the culprits involved in the New World Order. Part 1 provides a review and commentary by Jeremy Elliott on the classic works of G. Edward Griffin and Yuri Bezmenov as they relate to the New World Order and current events.
>- G. Edward Griffin
>Griffin provides details on the mysterious and infamous "They," the Secret Societies, the puppet-masters behind the scenes who control the governments of the world through carefully constructed "Rings of Power." These power groups maintain generational plans for the implementation of a world wide communistic government, ushering in a New World Order. Griffin notes that this single unified government aspiration is enacted using:
>- A Collectivist ideology
>- Communism (under the banner of socialism)
>- A Fabian strategy
>- Pincer military tactics
>...which leads to the consolidation of all national sovereignty, into the hands of a small, but elite group, in the "Rings of Power."
>G. Edward Griffin Books:
>- The Fearful Master: A Second Look at the United Nations - G. Edward Griffin
>- The Creature from Jekyll Island - G. Edward Griffin
>- Yuri Alexandrovich Bezmenov (Alias: Tomas Schuman)
>Yuri Bezmenov details the process of how a non-communist country is converted into communism through the 4 stages of ideological subversion. Once Ideological Subversion is in focus, we can see clearly how the entire world is being duped to accept this long standing communistic world government agenda enforced by governments on behalf of the "Rings of Power." Together, Griffin and Bezmenov provide key insights into how the "they" subvert the world under their control, from behind the scenes, but in plain sight.
>Bezmenov books:
>- Deception Was My Job (The Testimony of Yuri Bezmenov Propagandist for the KGB) - Yuri Bezmenov
>- Love Letter to America - Yuri Bezmenov
[YouTube] Communist Subversion | A Plan For Total World-Wide Control | Part 1 [Embed]
Mirror: https://www.bitchute.com/video/KXbTG3Eyzgyd/ [Embed]

>>304031
how will we ever survive the titanic threat of twitter, tumblr AND reddit? truly the white race may crumble before the combined force of three whole websites.
>>304038
given that 1917 was funded by imperial Germany, the suggestion would appear to be that Germany at least in part started WW2 against Germany. As for Judea declares war on Germany - yeah, it even says it's boycotts and demonstrations in nice, big, easy-to-read letters under the headline. Oh whoops, are boycotts not fair? maybe Germany should have thought of that before levelling them upon Jews. also - you faggots SERIOUSLY didn't know about the Spartacus League and Rosa Luxemburg? Jesus christ, it's basic history and context for anybody learning about the rise of the National Socialists. I guess you just never bothered to learn about the rise of your own ideology, but that can hardly be taken as much of a surprise.

>>304133
Literally fucking LOLWUT? I'm not NatSoc, I'm an eco-fascist! Good try you dickless simp but oh PLEASE keep posturing like you aren't a 60IQ britmutt propaganda shill! FUCK the spartacuck league and jewsa shekelberg. Let me guess, you didn't know both were paid, controlled opposition to begin with? Look up the meaning of 'controlled opposition'. Ahhh, right, and that oh so ClEvEr faux-meme of "w-w-well durr 1917 cobbudist reborushun wuz impeeryal" marks you out as a good goy. Please, explain that. Better yet, don't. You don't know the first fucking facts about history, making you a shining example of typical britmutt 60IQ. Go back to sucking off somalis, that's about the only thing you were ever good at.

>>304135
Why do you keep saying Britmutt?

>>304135
> PLEASE keep posturing like you aren't a 60IQ britmutt propaganda shill!
I wasn't aware I was posturing as such.
> FUCK the spartacuck league and jewsa shekelberg.
I didn't say they were good, but it is unbelievably embarassing that the chap in that screenshot had never heard of them.
>Let me guess, you didn't know both were paid, controlled opposition to begin with?
of course I knew that, everybody knows that.
> Look up the meaning of 'controlled opposition'
what, so I can write it down and stick it to my fridge? I AM the controlled opposition
>marks you out as a good goy.
what, because I didn't talk about the Jewish roots of Lenin and Trotsky? here's a lil factoid bud: Trotsky was allowed to return to Russia at the behest of British forces, the Americans would have stopped him. But still you do not learn about how deep it all goes.
>Please, explain that. Better yet, don't.
it's not an explanation, it's pointing out that it's stupid to construe aggression against Tsarist Russia, the enemy of Germany, as a starting of WW2.
>You don't know the first fucking facts about history
yeah, clearly I need to drop the books and go in for infographics. had Hitler done that maybe he'd understand that there was no possible universe in which Britain did not go to war with him, it was imperial policy since Napoleon never to let a single power dominate on the continent, so we had always encouraged infighting, balkanization, instability... But he was too busy jacking off to some fantasized idea of an improvement over the Austro-Hungarian parliament to bother picking up a hansard. He didn't understand the first thing about Britain, and his unwillingness to spill our blood belies his yellow-bellied cowardice and weakness. he did not have the spirit necessary to win against a jewish behemoth oiled with the blood of our people without our consent, instead praising it, blockhead that he was.

>>304143
Self-explanatory.

>>304145
How wonderful, all it took was a few correct, well placed insults and the glownigger becomes so assblasted he relies on a dipshit smug le maymay animu pic to cover for your hurt emotions. You must be proud of being so jewed with all of those projections going on. Good job outing yourself, did a better job than expected!

>>304152
But it's not self explanatory. Why is it your favourite word?

>>304164
The mere fact that you do not understand an explicitly self-explanatory phrase shows an extreme lack of self-awareness and historical knowledge.

>>304177
You misunderstand what I said, but I'm telling you this because I want this conversation to move in a positive direction, which means I won't throw in some extra insult at you.
Perhaps instead of asking what your beef with the british is, or why britmutt is your favourite word, I should focus on the core issue. Why do you get so hostile whenever someone doesn't agree with you?

>>304152
>You must be proud of being so jewed with all of those projections going on.
the anime's indicator enough that I'm jewed lel
>Good job outing yourself, did a better job than expected!
I was not pretending not to be a shill - where did I say I wasn't? I'm Jewish though, not CIA.
>>304164
because of the intermixing of English blood with Celtic blood, I would assume, given that "Amerimutt" meant intermixed blood.
>>304177
>image
certainly not a good piece of legislation, however I wonder why the Jewish Autonomous Oblast was all the way on the ass-end of Siberia? hmmm, could it be the USSR was not quite as Jew-controlled as you claim? Add into that the doctor's plot, Stalin's excuse for a mini genocide against us, and you're left with a view where really, we Jews are responsible for the improvements after Stalin's death, if anything.
>>304186
> Why do you get so hostile whenever someone doesn't agree with you?
he's probably right to be hostile in this case, but it's fairly common for Americans to despise agreement in all it's forms.

>>304211
>I wonder why the Jewish Autonomous Oblast was all the way on the ass-end of Siberia?
A token to the rabbis to group the undesirables (poor and insignificant kikes) while showing an independent enclave inside a Christian nation. Typical kike logic.

>>304214
>Typical kike logic.
the same logic exercised by the "poor and insignificant" of our number? it would appear to me that if some Jews are discardable by the "international Jewry", then the conclusion we must draw from the top 1% being roughly half Jewish is that the defining element of the ruling elite is not Jewishness. If all Jews were united in some sort of hivemind, then this would merely be them comandeering the heights of the world's wealth, but as it stands, if it's only some Jews, then it's really the position they hold that defines them, and not their preexisting defining characteristics that define their position. tl;dr I don't understand how a ruling elite is uniquely Jewish if they are only "some Jews", just as the white among the ruling elite are only "some whites".

>>304219
The jews in charge push policies and perform actions that benefit jews above others, while the jews not in charge benefit from these policies and help the ruling elite spread lies whether they realize it or not. Jews still claim to be oppressed while oppressing others. Gay whites are entitled to better lives than straight whites and blacks are entitled to better lives than them and black women and muslims are entitled to better lives than them and jews are at the top of this anti-white jewish pyramid that seeks to rape fairness and rape our future and rape our children. Some whites are willing to work with the jews for money or work for the jews because they are brainwashed, but all jews are parasites for aiding and abetting a corrupt system that parasitically feeds upon us while killing us.

>>304220
>The jews in charge push policies and perform actions that benefit jews above others
they're not doing a bang-up job of it, I'm still a NEET. least they could do is give me a job.
>while the jews not in charge benefit from these policies and help the ruling elite spread lies whether they realize it or not.
that's a fair enough point, it's why I'm here after all ^_^
>Jews still claim to be oppressed while oppressing others.
I don't think I'm oppressed, but I would be if you guys had your way - and even before the whole Jewish thing, even if I were white you'd still have me forcibly euthanized cause of autism.
>Gay whites are entitled to better lives than straight whites and blacks are entitled to better lives than them and black women and muslims are entitled to better lives than them and jews are at the top of this anti-white jewish pyramid that seeks to rape fairness and rape our future and rape our children.
I'm almost certain that legislation on diversity hiring and stuff is intended to spark outrage - after all, with the iron grip we/they have over the economy, diversity's a given in the majority of jobs anyway, legislation or no. this economic system is one in which there never can be any meritocracy or fairness, even if you were to try to remove the diversity.
>Some whites are willing to work with the jews for money or work for the jews because they are brainwashed
is it really brainwashing if almost every white works with "us" unconditionally from the get-go? it's maybe 0.000000001% of the white population that would really, honestly refuse to work with someone because they were Jewish.
>but all jews are parasites for aiding and abetting a corrupt system that parasitically feeds upon us while killing us.
I'm thrice a parasite: Jew, Autist, NEET. get your bug spray if you want, but I ain't going anywhere :^)

>>304224
Oh no
Are you a jew?
Is this going to be another round of "I am a jobless jew and I don't personally rule the world therefore I surely cannot be privileged compared to you?"
Is this the part where you say because the long hard hours of a hard-working white working-class citizen gets him more income than you, whitey bad unga bunga?

>>304226
>Are you a jew?
I already said this, did you miss it? ._. anyways, yes, by descent and not religion (religiously I'm christian)
>Is this going to be another round of "I am a jobless jew and I don't personally rule the world therefore I surely cannot be privileged compared to you?"
well, I mean that sounds like the logic that usually denies white privilege, so I don't see why I can't use it too, though in fairness I cannot say whether I am privileged or not compared to you. perhaps I am, but nonetheless I wouldn't mind a bit more privilege.
>Is this the part where you say because the long hard hours of a hard-working white working-class citizen gets him more income than you, whitey bad unga bunga?
no - obviously the comparison would have to be between unemployed white and myself, but I don't know the stats on that. mainly I'm angry at Jews among the elite, who according to all the conspiracy theories are meant to be all buddy-buddy and helpful to me, and yet despite our shared heritage I don't seem to get anything out of them. if you could tax Jews specifically and give me UBI from that tax, I'd be just fine with that, whites don't have to get involved at all. whites are pretty great when they're not NatSocs that kill their own kind just for having autism.

>>304228
Why are jews so unjustifiably proud of the fact that they steal so much wealth and labour from the white race every year? Why are they only "Christians" or "Germans" or "Fellow whites" when it benefits them and Jews when they aren't afraid or lying to themselves and others? Does it bother you that your little ethnostate of pissrael was hand-crafted by white people who were promised that if jews were given a place to call their home, they'd fuck off to it instead of parasitically worming their way to the top of any host nation willing to accept them and trying to subvert those host nations for their benefit? How do jews feel about all the white troops dying in the middle east in the name of jewish profit? Do you think you'll ever be made to pay back the cash America gives pissrael for existing?

>>304236
>Why are jews so unjustifiably proud of the fact that they steal so much wealth and labour from the white race every year?
same reason thieves can take pride in their work. I suppose it feels exhilirating to both take risk and profit off the "suckers". for me personally, I just enjoy not having to work... I have plenty of time for anime, games, etc. why bother working hard when it'll never pay off for me?
>Why are they only "Christians" or "Germans" or "Fellow whites" when it benefits them and Jews when they aren't afraid or lying to themselves and others?
I think that's actually somewhat subconscious. remember when Alex Jones said he was Jewish? I dunno if he actually is or not, but if so he certainly doesn't identify as such most of the time. similarly, I look white to people around me whenever I'm going on late night store runs or such, but in the back of my mind is the Jewish heritage which can come to the forefront whenever it seems relevant. who knows, could be deliberate for some figures.
>Does it bother you that your little ethnostate of pissrael was hand-crafted by white people
it does, actually. it's a horrid arid little strip of desert granted to us by an Empire where the aristocracy kissed our asses and the rest hated us, it really does not feel good. We should have taken up the offer of the Japanese, who simply respected us as a fellow people, and would have given us a comfy little pacific coast to live on. sadly the allies "saved" us and gave us a bunch of sand to stick up our asses. no true friend of us Jews in this world but the Japanese.
>who were promised that if jews were given a place to call their home, they'd fuck off to it instead of parasitically worming their way to the top of any host nation willing to accept them and trying to subvert those host nations for their benefit?
it's not just us that do that - the Italians had the Mafia, the Chinese had the Tong... it simply so happens that Italians and Chinese did not have quite so long to establish themselves in America as we had to establish ourselves in Europe. Sure, it doesn't reflect well on us, but since my lifestyle is that of a useless parasite anyway, it doesn't make much difference to me that my race aren't big-dick chads historically speaking.
>How do jews feel about all the white troops dying in the middle east in the name of jewish profit?
I don't know if I can speak to others - I know my parents of course, but they're not all that political. personally I have a perhaps quite stereotypical view of it for my people, which is that it's a waste of money. Israel is held onto for mainly emotional reasons, when there were much more profitable and easily defensible regions we could have picked (our offers ranged from madagascar, to kenya and of course manchuria), and the money burned on western militaries could be put to much better use EVEN in our benefit (not to even mention the immense good it could do whites). I'd say it's almost all down to a sentimental attachment to Jerusalem - but as is said at passover even today, "next year in Jerusalem"... You can't go back, Jerusalem surely now travels with us. who cares about the bricks and mortar?
>Do you think you'll ever be made to pay back the cash America gives pissrael for existing?
I doubt it. even if the left in America is stopped (and that's a big if), the conservatives are almost all fanatically devoted to Israel. The only chance I think there is of the west getting Israel to pay for something is if the western left push Palestine's claims, or push for reparations to the Palestinians.

>>304186
Asking rhetorical questions

>>304186
Whoops, kitty post. Now: asking rhetorical questions outside the topic and failing to ASK the relative ones, thus receiving ANSWERS, you are pissing straight into the wind. I hate kikes above all, chinks slightly less, then the amerimutts/frogs/britmutts in third, fourth, fifth positions. See the pattern or do I have to make a diagram?

>>304211
>literal jew
OH GOLLY GEE, it wasn't like one couldn't see what was behind (((your))) posts! It's hilarious when das juden don't even recognize their own patterns. Stalin was hardcore pro-kike especially since his palaces were bankrolled by 15 prominent long noses. What mini-genocide? Oh, you mean the secularist jews that wanted nothing to do with international kikery that, when they began voicing opposition mysteriously disappeared like Tartaria did? Your bullshit doesn't stick there. After Stalin, the USSR was further fucked by 3-4 magnitudes. Where do you get off claiming that secret inspections, mechanical eavesdropping, corporate-backed police raids, private for-profit-gulags and prisons springing up everywhere, was somehow BETTER?

You are either pigshit indoctrinated trash that is too afraid to look beyond your own nose, shilling an ideology and thus perhaps a shill, or perhaps not.. or possibly all the above.

>>304244
>Stalin was hardcore pro-kike especially since his palaces were bankrolled by 15 prominent long noses
I'm not entirely sure to what you refer - as near as I can tell, the Kuntsevo dacha was funded by the Soviet state.
>Oh, you mean the secularist jews that wanted nothing to do with international kikery that, when they began voicing opposition mysteriously disappeared like Tartaria did?
well, since they were Jews, yes I do - what's so Jewish about the elite if so many Jews are not elites?
>Your bullshit doesn't stick there.
I see, so Jews don't count if they're secularist and not involved in "international Jewry"? well, that's me off the hook then.
>After Stalin, the USSR was further fucked by 3-4 magnitudes
well, that was the time where there were less famines and the famous space program, but I'm sure those were just minor boons to an overall downward spiral, right?
>Where do you get off claiming that secret inspections, mechanical eavesdropping, corporate-backed police raids, private for-profit-gulags and prisons springing up everywhere, was somehow BETTER?
what, so you preferred all that but worse under Stalin?
>You are either pigshit indoctrinated trash that is too afraid to look beyond your own nose, shilling an ideology and thus perhaps a shill, or perhaps not.. or possibly all the above.
I'm mainly here to collect the images you're posting. when I'm going around trying to deradicalise people, it helps if I have infographics and memes that are excessively unconvincing, to counterbalance the ones like the IQ or toxoplasmosis images. I'm also very appreciative of the clop, you guys have good taste, despite your less good views.

>I'm also very appreciative of the clop
Could be a decent time to give him what he wants, folks. He's been nothing but confrontational and smug this whole time; pretty obviously trying to provoke a reaction, nothing more.

>>304246
>Could be a decent time to give him what he wants, folks
well I've got the clop thread open in another tab anyways
>He's been nothing but confrontational and smug this whole time; pretty obviously trying to provoke a reaction, nothing more.
apologies for the smugness, but I mean some of this stuff is an absolute joke. like the whole "electrocution chamber" story supposedly representing the kind of witness testimonies heard at the Nuremberg trials - the original article on that was from a LOCAL Chicago paper, attributed to an unnamed source in the Soviet Army. now, even assuming a paper that remains local to this day had, in the mid 40s, a Russian translator and a reporter in the field in a foreign occupation, there's absolutely no validity to the story to begin with, and people at the time who believed it were just brainless sensationalism-gobblers, and it's certainly not representative of the historical record surrounding the holocaust. there are plenty of valid criticisms of the existing orthodoxy on the subject, and of the legal restrictions and condescending attitude regarding questioning the validity of this consensus, but that is not one of them, and all too often that's the level of evidence I find myself dealing with. Some stuff, like the second image on your previous post, is actually genuinely engaging and interesting, and it's that kind of stuff I like to collect - after all, if some guy on IRC links it to me, it helps to have a response ready to the hard knock questions.

>>304245
This is astonishing. You don't even try to hide how much of a jewgoy you are! You are attempting to DEFEND kikery while ABSOLVING kikes of their inherent criminality throughout the ages. Astounding discovery! Dunning-Kruger is you. That excessive smugness only shows how deeply conceited, hysterically obsolete, and doctrinally orthodox you are when it comes to defending "hurrdurr muh kikez r da best". You haven't given a single honest answer. All you've done is deflect, reshuffle, twist words, twist meanings, gaslight, and use historical cherry picking. Nothing to offer save for zero intellect vomiting of (((proper judea))) drivel. It is empirically clear that you are a shill, yet one that refuses to accept how much of a inbred pig-fucking goycuck you are.

Glownigger cuckshill revealed: it's (((you))).

>>303693
> if you assume in the US that Cabal’s infiltration of social media and business is the equivalent of government action in other countries.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8846087/Nick-Clegg-involved-Facebooks-decision-hush-story-Joe-Bidens-son.html

It is government action. It literally goes up to the Queen of England and the Pope. All of the Muslim states organized and passed off their agents as Communists, the Russians kicked in some support, and the British are laundering their shit for kickbacks. And the British were doing this because Hillary Clinton had asked them to.

You've heard of George Soros? He works for Lord Mark Malloch Brown. They organize Muslim terrorists on behalf of Qatar.

Look into TerraMar. It's a glowing British intel outfit that was laundering funds for the Muslims to their terrorists in the USA.

Look into Demos. They were running the Queen's Privy Council.

>>304245
>well, that was the time where there were less famines and the famous space program, but I'm sure those were just minor boons to an overall downward spiral, right?

The relative prosperity of the USSR absolutely comes from Stalin's brutal industrialization and this is not even under debate, famines naturally decreased only after and because the process was completed as originally intended and getting a great deal of ex-national socialist STEM's didn't hurt either.

The reality of the situation is that the USSR faced a mismanaged demographic problem in which the increasingly wealthier ethnic Russian population suffered the same demographical problems as the west if not worst, while the non-Russian soviet ethnies displayed a booming in their demographics and the rapid liberalization process after Stalin's death didn't helped matters either, in a nut-shell 105IQ Russians were being steadily outnumbered by 80IQ or so populations, and would in fact have been outnumbered by the 00', this saw a proportional decline in Soviet high-skilled labour among the most dramatic declines, eventually leading up to massive shortages affecting the quality of life.

Stalin was a complicated figure, and it's certainly worth pointing out that he died just a few weeks after he launched a directive to strike down soviet jews, his close circle even insisted that these jews had killed him, but the new administration dismissed everything, it's no wonder he's in fact placed alongside Hitler as one of the main advocates of "anti-semitism".

For anyone interested, it's all centered around the "doctors' plot"

>>304271
Fucking what, nigga? Stalin was the one to purge the soviet land from the jews. He raised to the top by making jews go after each other and thus he was victorious, standing on the pile of dead corpses, including a kike Zinoviev and a sneacky jew fuck Kamenev. Stalin's regime was the best since the jews were basically sent to labour camps and the economy of the USSR was drastically improving. Trotsky was fucking blown away and thrown out of the country, leaving him to write the same propaganda that you're reciting. Go play some mario and leave politics to grown-ups, you dumb shmuck.

>>304282
Allow me to drop a Russian redpill about Russia, Stalin, and the jewry.

>The Bloody Red Pill:
>Solzhenitsyn’s Two Hundred Years Together,
>Part 5
https://counter-currents.com/2021/03/two-hundred-years-together-5/
Part 4: https://counter-currents.com/2021/03/two-hundred-years-together-4/
Part 3: https://counter-currents.com/2021/03/two-hundred-years-together-3/
Part 2: https://counter-currents.com/2021/02/two-hundred-years-together-2/
Part 1: https://counter-currents.com/2021/02/two-hundred-years-together-1/

>>304251
>when it comes to defending "hurrdurr muh kikez r da best".
that's what you do with your race, it's pretty natural to extol the virtues of your ancestors.
>All you've done is deflect, reshuffle, twist words, twist meanings, gaslight, and use historical cherry picking.
yep. after all, the genuine debate about this ultimately comes down to my own versus your own, and we'll find whatever tools and means necessary with which to fight each other, surely. take the holocaust - say hypothetically you could 100% prove it did not happen, well we who do not deny it would still not like Hitler if you did. And vice versa, if we could prove the holocaust did happen to you, you most certainly wouldn't have any changed opinion on the man or what he did. so in that sense, a lot of the actual data is irrelevant.
>Nothing to offer save for zero intellect
well obviously. anybody who disagrees with you has zero intellect. and in a sense that's actually serious - all of you seem to always have STEM jobs, medical professions, things like that. your side has a tremendous amount of success in that regard, while mine tends to accuse you of being NEETs precisely because we are the NEETs. so yes, it is true that I am not as smart as you, otherwise I might have a job.
>It is empirically clear that you are a shill
I have already stated that yes I am indeed a shill. some of /pol/'s stuff is genuinely challenging, and the rest of it is "hurr durr predictive programming" crap where people haven't even read the newspaper articles they're underlining. I even make a few like that myself, as it's absolutely vital I flood the convincing infographics with stuff that any halfway-there ideologue will find ridiculous.
>Glownigger cuckshill revealed: it's (((you))).
yeah, and the one who revealed me was me. I'd love for the CIA to hire me tbh, I don't think they're doing a good enough job with you guys.
>>304271
>getting a great deal of ex-national socialist STEM's didn't hurt either.
most of those guys went to the US, the primary consultants left for the Soviets were the people who actually worked building the V2s.
>Stalin was a complicated figure, and it's certainly worth pointing out that he died just a few weeks after he launched a directive to strike down soviet jews,
and that's part of why I attribute the liberalization, regardless of it's effects, to us.
>>304292
>Solzhenitsyn
I still don't understand why even normal people continue to like this guy, hasn't he been proven time and time again to be excessively anti-semitic?

>>304293
>hasn't he been proven time and time again to be excessively anti-semitic pro-Truth?
For the record. Palestinians are semitic, Arabs are semitic, those who call themselves Jews today are actually Turkish.

>>304294
>For the record. Palestinians are semitic, Arabs are semitic, those who call themselves Jews today are actually Turkish.
news to me. regardless the term "anti-semitic" is used primarily to describe those who hate us Jews, and that's obviously the sense in which I mean it. regardless, I still don't understand why ordinary people continue to be alright with Solzhenitsyn. As for the Khazarian descent, I certainly personally feel no connection to Israel or to Jerusalem, and as I believe I said earlier I would have much preferred the Jewish homeland be settled in Manchuria, where had the Japanese won, we could have reestablished contact with our brothers in China, the Kaifeng Jews. Sadly we're stuck with you Americans as our protectors. But anyways, couldn't you post some more Bezmenov stuff? he's easier to discredit than Solzhenitsyn.

>>304295
>news to me
Not any more, the sacred scrolls warned about the present time.

>>304296
>Not any more, the sacred scrolls warned about the present time.
what, like Gog and Magog? bit of a joke tbh. you'd also have to cut out the Apostle Paul, he wouldn't be too happy with the whole White Nationalist "have sex and families and children constantly" thing.
And to be clear because I know you'll point out the fallacy, yes I am aware that mere incredulity at Gog and Magog does not disprove it, however in counter I'd say it's a sort of Russel's Teapot deal, where it very well could be true but there's no definitive proving it one way or the other. All I can say is that personally I draw more from the non-esoteric, but then, that's a fairly pointless thing to say on this board.

>>304292
Before the first revolution in February jews targeted russia from different perspectives. The february revolution, which got rid of Nicolas II was done by masons. During that time Stalin was sent away to Siberia and was forgotten by his comrades Bolshevics. Then the second socialist revolution got rid of Kerenski and all of his fake ass russian elite representatives, to be replaced with jews. By that time Stalin has returned to Moskow and was met by Lenin, Trotsky and others. Stalin himself was presumed dead so nobody expected him to show up. Stalin then was assigned to write down whatever shit that takes place during jewish secret meetings. Stalin later made a remark that during that time he noticed how power-hungry those jews are. All Stalin had to do was facing them against each other, resulting in jews stabbing each other's backs. Stalin is a real politician. He is not an opportunistic one shot like those you see on TV. He ruled the land with Iron fist and contries, even continents feared him. If you use the argument that he is a tyrant, just know that when you kill one person - you are a murderer. When you kill a million - that's only a statistic. And just because he's a communist doesn't mean he's a kike. He stole that role model from jews to use against them. Any ideology is just garbage that is fed to the masses. The real deal is what you make of it and how many contries fall to your will while those masses burn it to ashes.

>>304297
Are you aware that Moses is a myth, right?

>>304299
I think you mean "you are aware that moses is a myth, right". I personally don't believe that Moses was a myth, but to be honest I haven't looked into it. feel free to enlighten me.

>>304282
Shut the fuck up you drunk retard, had you payed a little more attention you would have noticed that is exactly what i implied, Stalin the Jew slayer turned the Soviet Union into a superpower, the kikes that replaced him aswell as anything great that came after were just directly reaping off his accomplishments and eventually ruining everything he brought forth, while great third reich minds that both America and the USSR raced to capture before the other could, became the backbone of the Soviet nuclear and space programs, both of which couldn't have been accomplished without Stalin's aggressive industrialization regardless of their available tech, even if Von Braun had defected for the USSR, the soviet space-program would still had been death for the lack of resources like the British.

>>304293
Take your time if you need but please, do not flee from your mistake, you looked at the conclusion of Stalin's industrial reforms and unironically tried to switch over the credit of its possitive effects to some mindless liberalization brought foward by your kind.

This thread is woefully barren of horsepussy

>>304311
>you looked at the conclusion of Stalin's industrial reforms and unironically tried to switch over the credit of its possitive effects to some mindless liberalization brought foward by your kind.
true. however I do regard the liberalization as the true advantage - the main difficulty there is whether it was only possible with Stalin's industrialization. perhaps it was - could it have been handled less brutally? I think perhaps, though I recognize that ultimately that's just speculation. I much prefer Rabbis Ashlag and Zalkind in terms of my people's contributions to the world, and in that sense it's rather pointless to defend their actions just due to shared heritage. After all, I wish nothing to do with Rand or the Zionists, and there's just as much shared heritage there.
>>304312
this! come goyim, provide your overlord with some quality clop :^)

>>304313
>true. however I do regard the liberalization as the true advantage
Once again, you do not provide nor convey an explanation as to why you think so, i've explained the negative demographic effects it had on the USSR to no refutation or counter-argument from your part thus far, i get it may have opened the opportunity to furher strangle the ethnic russian population and strengthen your rule with the help of hostile minorities like it's been successfully done in the west, but collapsing the empire in the process kinda outweights the benefits.

>the main difficulty there is whether it was only possible with Stalin's industrialization. perhaps it was - could it have been handled less brutally? I think perhaps

There is however no speculation required on the fact that barbarossa was coming.

>>304318
>Once again, you do not provide nor convey an explanation as to why you think so
because there isn't an objective reason to think so.
>i've explained the negative demographic effects it had on the USSR to no refutation or counter-argument from your part thus far
I don't have one, I just think that those are acceptable sacrifices for liberalization, which is a position that cannot be defended objectively.
>but collapsing the empire in the process kinda outweights the benefits.
in terms of the rise of Putin I agree, but had Russia balkanized that would have been an acceptable outcome from my point of view. I don't particularly value the strength of empires and nations, it mainly seems self-serving. As Rabbi Shemaiah says: "Loath mastery over others, and avoid intimacy with the government." so those Jews who worked not for liberalization (at least for it's own sake) but for their own consolidation of power were traitors to our people.
>There is however no speculation required on the fact that barbarossa was coming.
well naturally.

>>304319
>in terms of the rise of Putin I agree, but had Russia balkanized that would have been an acceptable outcome from my point of view. I don't particularly value the strength of empires and nations

Fair enough, although the chaos that ensues in collapsing empires it's precisely what creates the possibility of such changes in the power-structure, stability it's important.

>On Operation Barbarossa
Just so the point it's clear, Barbarossa it's relevant because it's a race against time for Soviet industrialization, Stalin's reforms are predicated on the need for a harsh and fast approach in order to not only be able to compete with the rest of europe but to prevent a certain demise at their hands, and by the time the greatest invasion of history started, it did turned into a struggle for the empire's survival

Overall, i've been waiting to share what i've learned about Soviet history to this community, as the pol-sphere is rather lacking on redpills here, this proved to be a perfect time, thanks for your attention.

>>304321
Maybe next time Poners can ignore a hidden id's thread accordingly.

>>304322
>this proved to be a perfect time
Not for this horsefucker.

>Maybe next time Poners can ignore a hidden id's thread accordingly.
That wasn't exactly what I was concerned with. Though, unless there's someone that's willing to come in and shell the thread with horsepussy, I guess there's nothing keeping you two from carrying on. But if you don't mind, I'm gonna stay out of it as much as I can, and I hope other poners follow suit.

>>304326
Does it bother the Jew that they can only prosper at the expense of others with underhanded tactics that exploit the goodwill of others?
Don't they fear a world where the white man's goodwill towards his lessers runs out?

>>304321
>He's just looking for an excuse to act smug and condescending, mate.
I'm not great at understanding this stuff, so lemme try and spell it out. I am not smarter than you (rather the reverse, as we've been over), I am not more educated than you, I am not worth more than you, indeed I am a worthless person.it's just that I have nothing left in my life besides anime, vidya and politics, and I just happen to be bored.
>>304322
>stability is important.
I agree, certainly - though even if we account for the inherent instability of nonwestern and nonasian nations, I think authoritarianism does not always equal stability. and with regards to stability, while it is desirable and worth it in most cases, I think there's a tradeoff between quality/enjoyability of life and stability. at the end of the day, I think society ought to procure happiness and financial sustainability for it's citizenry first and foremost.
>Stalin's reforms are predicated on the need for a harsh and fast approach in order to not only be able to compete with the rest of europe but to prevent a certain demise at their hands, and by the time the greatest invasion of history started, it did turned into a struggle for the empire's survival
I see - I wasn't sure if this was the whole "who knew about barbarossa first" debate or not.
>Overall, i've been waiting to share what i've learned about Soviet history to this community, as the pol-sphere is rather lacking on redpills here, this proved to be a perfect time, thanks for your attention.
no worries bud, Soviet history's pretty interesting! drop any more pills you've got too.
>>304327
>Does it bother the Jew that they can only prosper at the expense of others with underhanded tactics that exploit the goodwill of others?
I don't think the others view it as any different from white colonialism. personally, it doesn't really bother me either, but I also feel somewhat thankful to whites for providing the comfortable welfare that allows me to survive.
>Don't they fear a world where the white man's goodwill towards his lessers runs out?
dunno about the others, but personally, as I'd actually previously stated in this thread, I'd much rather go to a different race for goodwill, such as the Japanese. I'd much rather interact with them.

>>304330
>the Japanese. I'd much rather interact with them.
What? Fucking why?
Do you have an anime fetish or something?

>>304331
>What? Fucking why?
no offense, but I can't stand Britain. it's a depressing country filled with depressing people.
>Do you have an anime fetish or something?
oh you betcha! most of us younger Jews do. it's got everything we love, after all. if you wanna think of it this way, consider the kind of stuff we were into during the Weimar Republic - anime's got all of that and a bag of potato chips.

What the fuck is happening in this thread.

>>304334
A schlomo derrailed it.

>>304330
You kinda missed the point there, you mentioned Putin's rise to power as a bad thing and that you do not care about the power of the empires your frends get to control.
I mentioned stability because chaos in the declining Soviet empire was ultimately what provided the opportunity for Putin.

>>304335
Bro, the thread has no id's

>>304335
I'm not stopping you from going back on topic should you wish. my first post in this thread was just enjoying the amusing images being posted, and with one of the screenshotted anons not knowing a great deal about anything.
>>304342
>you mentioned Putin's rise to power as a bad thing and that you do not care about the power of the empires your frends get to control. I mentioned stability because chaos in the declining Soviet empire was ultimately what provided the opportunity for Putin.
and chaos in the revolution allowed for Stalin, just as chaos in the first world war allowed for the revolution and the chaos in the russo-japanese war allowed for the provisional government. ultimately though, chaos is an unavoidable side effect of attempting to change the status quo, and as such, even if it seems a little "hocus-pocus", the goal as it were is to make it through the chaos without some opportunist taking charge, such as Putin. Maybe it would have been better without the collapse, maybe not, it's hard to tell, but I'd rather try for a good system and fail than stick with a bad but slightly preferable to failure system, personally. I mean, as I was saying with Talmudic Rabbi quotes, an authoritarian Jew is no Jew at all. (Talmud is a specific covenant, you could call me messianic perhaps).

>>304342
>Bro, the thread has no id's
So your solution to this perceived problem is to bump it and encourage a shill? In case you haven't noticed, it's just you and him getting chummy by now.

>>304365
>So your solution to this perceived problem is to bump it and encourage a shill?
I'll post with or without you, you can't get rid of me bud :^)
>it's just you and him getting chummy by now.
aww, are you feeling lonely?

>>304368
1. those eyelashes are gorgeous
3. that slightly worried frozen expression is just spot on
4. that is a nice sailor fuku!
>>304369
4. that's a classic, the expression is perfect. I might edit it so it's the Zeon flag and not the swastika in the background there, that way I can share it on my IRC channel
>>304370
5. very evocative stretch
>>304371
1. "how to ride", lol. interactive text I guess
>>304372
4. that's a perfect ponker peach
nice! this'll all be going into my folder

>>304375
Happy to help; however there's only so much I can do on your behalf. The rest is up to you, mate.

>>304379
>Happy to help; however there's only so much I can do on your behalf. The rest is up to you, mate.
wait, what? I have to return an equivalent level of clop? but I thought this was a response to my """derailing""". unless you thought I was the other UK poster in this thread? what, is my jewish blood supposed to recoil at pony porn? dude, you guys are CONSTANTLY talking about how porn and mind geek are jewish, you seriously think we can't stomach a few sexy horses?

>>304355
Yeah, i know what the talmud is, but i don't know if it's worth the gamble for such disagreements, i mean was it that bad?, so bad that is only slighly better for you than Putin?.

Is it all about it being authoritarian? or is there more to it, What is so bad about authoritarianist control anyways?

>>304365
Over-agressiveness has never quite worked against smugness and cynicism

>>304385
>wait, what? I have to return an equivalent level of clop?
Nope.

>>304386
Nor does bumping and responding to his every post; but if you insist. I can't imagine taking a beating and thanking the guy for it would feel good, though.

>>304383
You kids these days and your seeing Amonguses everywhere
back in my day it was minecraft
>>304386
Authoritarianism sucks in theory because no one individual or commitee or bureau can be trusted to dictate every last detail of the lives of millions, perhaps even billions of people.
Then again "Authoritarian!" is usually used as a vague slur for ideas the speaker doesn't like such as "Fascist!" these days. There can be good authorities that want what's best for the people (natsoc) and bad authorities that want to sieze and abuse and hold on to power no matter the cost (the entire left)
Is it authoritarian for a government to say "People are not allowed to rape"? Is it authoritarian for a government to say "No degeneracy allowed on TV"?

>>304400
>Loosing

Ironic given your performance fag, i've already done what i came here for initially, at this point we're discussing whether the approach taken in the USSR after Stalin's murder was the best or not for jewish interests, i am not trying to roast anybody with this it would be as retarded as thinking that horse-pussy would work with this guy, am merely interested in his pov as he's someone who is not for the authoritarian USSR but isn't a zionist either.

>>304408
I said nothing about losing.

>your performance
I think you're mistaken about my priorities here.

>>304407
Nice larp but i was talking with the kike

>>304410
>I think you're mistaken about my priorities here.

You!, bastard...i was saving that one!

>>304411
If I may be so bold as to speak for the majority of anons ITT and the board, I conjecture that most of us would rather you took it to 4chan, or reddit, for that matter, or at the very least do everypony a courtesy and sage the thread. IIRC many of us have made it clear that we don't want this shit bumped to the top of the catalog.

>>304237
>We should have taken up the offer of the Japanese, who simply respected us as a fellow people, and would have given us a comfy little pacific coast to live on. sadly the allies "saved" us and gave us a bunch of sand to stick up our asses. no true friend of us Jews in this world but the Japanese.
Japanese hate you filthy inbred rats and what you are attempting to do to their country. Japanese are one of the few races with an honor culture that closely mirrors Europe, and are very intolerant of foreign scum fucking with their culture and history. PRC zhinks are the ones you suck you off because of the post-Mao communist brainwashing and cultural destruction your ilk brought on them.

>>304386
>Is it all about it being authoritarian? What is so bad about authoritarianist control anyways?
not so much, it's more about the natural tendencies of authoritarianism. theoretically, of course it seems natural to centralize power, and a centralized system of power could wield an overwhelming influence over society that could easily transform it much for the better in a relatively short span of time. however, centralized systems of authority generally turn out to be somewhat inefficient, especially as a key aspect of authoritarian centraliziation in particular is a greater lack of accountability, which often is attempted to be remedied by purges, loyalism, constant turnover, but at the end of the day in a centralized system you need longevity to keep things together (even though statistically these regimes in general seem to last less long), and that brings the kind of management that is either lazy or self-serving. either way it tends this way, because trying to keep this complex system effective means incentivizing survival above all - take for example this very country's NHS. under New Labour, waiting list reduction goals were set. all hospitals ended up doing was seeing less serious patients first, so they could clear all the quick fixes in a jiffy, leaving serious ailments in waiting for treatment. and of course - they weren't being incentivized to actually do well, after all, they were being incentivized to meet an arbitrary number. but you need the arbitrary numbers to manage something like that, even as relatively small as a national health service for a nation of around 60 million. for a full on government, and one which is likely to be somewhat stagnant and more expansive than average at that, these problems exponentiate. and that's not to mention the dehumanizing aspects of authoritarianism, but there's not much point talking beyond what works practically, I would guess.
>>304407
>Then again "Authoritarian!" is usually used as a vague slur for ideas the speaker doesn't like such as "Fascist!" these days.
specifically because what you just previously stated, about a central authority governing people's lives, is necessary in order to achieve the change in the way people behave that most forms of fascism aim to achieve.
>There can be good authorities that want what's best for the people (natsoc) and bad authorities that want to sieze and abuse and hold on to power no matter the cost (the entire left)
but the size of this authority and how it is managed is a relevant question also, as the problems I outlined in my above reply show up in excessively bureaucratic systems (which, by the way, are not unique to former socialist states. indeed I'd go so far as to say that most capitalist countries today are worse culprits)
>Is it authoritarian for a government to say "People are not allowed to rape"?
that can all depend on what you mean, and how it is achieved. in the early 1800s, you would have relied on either night watchmen to prevent a rape or the bowstreet runners to catch a perpetrator of rape - in this sense all the government did was state a general opposition to rape and left people to sort it out themselves. on the other end you have today, where people propose certain varieties of fart be classed as rape. ultimately though, because society is made up of more than one person, we must define freedom as maximizing the range of allowed activity of a given individual without allowing such an individual to then impede upon another's range of allowed activity. and while many will protest that they most certainly have some "right to respect" or some such that is infringed upon by some minor trifling action of another, it is not the task of the law to manifest petty squabbles, but to delineate what are actual, material infringements upon a person regardless of excessively particular circumstance.
>Is it authoritarian for a government to say "No degeneracy allowed on TV"?
so going by my previous definition, yes, it would be. but to me this is honestly irrelevant, what is much more immediate and pertinent to me about this is how nightmarishly bureaucratic and inefficient and corrupt whatever body that regulated television would be. would it be tasked to oversee entertainment production, or indeed produce all entertainment, or merely regulate that which is aired? regardless I think it would be an absolute laughing stock of an institution that would achieve effectively nothing, just like the pathetic attempt of parliament to restrict the "video nasties" of the previous century.
>>304408
>am merely interested in his pov as he's someone who is not for the authoritarian USSR but isn't a zionist either.
I guess I'd broadly say I lean "centrist" libertarian. or if you read a bunch of boring leftist theory, it becomes acceptable to say "anarchist" for this too, since anarchism, in the leftist sense, does not require the abolition of government. so perhaps "anarcho-individualist", but I'd really rather just discuss systems on their own merit. for example, I reckon Austria-Hungary wasn't all that bad, despite my supposed "ideological" disagreements with it. what I really objected to originally was just how unconvincing some of the memes were - I'd like to think I can respect any point of view put across well enough (which is not at all to say that I regard myself as someone who puts views across especially well... only to say that I can do better than an out-of-context headline.)
>>304416
>If I may be so bold as to speak for the majority of anons ITT and the board, I conjecture that most of us would rather you took it to 4chan, or reddit, for that matter
I recognize that you don't want people who disagree with you posting here, however I think you were always testing it with the "porn deterrent" idea. a community that claims to have natural protection is an interesting hornet's nest to poke, after all.

>>304418
>Japanese hate you filthy inbred rats and what you are attempting to do to their country.
let me guess, the same way swedes do? yeah yeah, I get it already, every single person on earth hates us 100%. but since that barely appears to factor into how most people are acting, I'm not exactly particularly interested to know that "x hates u". find me a country or group that supposedly doesn't hate us for starters, how's that for surprising news? As for "what we're attempting to do to their country", there's no need to eliminate the Japanese, as there apparently is for some reason with you whites. the whole reason we're doing the white genocide on you is because of bad beef between us historically, right? so why would we do that to the Japanese? what, because they could pose a threat? everybody is a threat when you're a group as small and pathetic as us, and I certainly don't trust the less advanced societies of this world to put up with us more than you guys. I'd take whites over most of the rest of the world, in fairness, but the Japanese just happen to be an upgrade over whites. that is, a "servant" has to be "intelligent" enough not to rebel against the master, and in that sense anybody other than asians and whites are no good.
>Japanese are one of the few races with an honor culture that closely mirrors Europe, and are very intolerant of foreign scum fucking with their culture and history.
good. I don't want to change it as such, I like Japanese culture as it exists today. and there's no reason for the rest of us not to like it either - just because we have no concept of honor doesn't mean we can't appreciate that others have it, and the big problem with european honor is ultimately to do with our prior relationship, not with the honor in and of itself. and remember, fucking with your culture is to do again with the problem you supposedly pose to us - why waste money and resources on mindgeek and advertising and such just for the heck of it? no, it's specifically done to de-tooth the european tiger while it's sleeping, it's totally pointless to engage in otherwise, so I see no reason to fuck with japanese culture. no need to fuck with their history either - they didn't interact with us, after all. obviously it's all opinion on my part and I have no say in any of these matters, but on a personal level I'd be distraught to have Tale of the Heike altered, for example, it's an absolutely uniquely gorgeous example of recorded historical epic. "The Matter of France" has got absolutely nothing on it, let me tell you.
>PRC zhinks are the ones who suck you off because of the post-Mao communist brainwashing and cultural destruction your ilk brought on them.
China is an absolute embarrassment and a shame. Regulating their internet, keeping games in internet cafes, conscripting the unfit into camps - it's a joke. utterly pathetic, I want nothing to do with it, because that's not a sensible or effective way to govern a society nor to keep it's citizenry in check. China is attempting to make it's people healthier and work harder in a way I completely despise, there's no special need for the Chinese to be particularly well-off, so unlike the Japanese I'd much rather China radically liberalize, so it's society can relax a bit and pose less of a threat to world peace, to me, and to my people. I might even go so far as to call Xi Jinping our greatest enemy, thanks to him any foothold we had in China is completely worthless. understand that we work through media, through culture - and I do think that in a sense, no offence, this is to people's benefit. we make people more complacent, more comfortable, less likely to be violent and demand things like family, country, health, etc, and it makes things safer for everyone. and key to all of that is that we don't use the state at all, a complete antithesis to the stupid fascist crap Jinping is pulling.

>>304440
(apologies, forgot the sage)

>>304439
Fuck dude, why do you keep loosing the point?, you were supposed to answer why the authoritarian system of the USSR was only slightly better than Putin and thus it was worth the gamble, FROM your perspective of Jewish interests.

Anyways it was an interesting talk, i won't be replying anymore because poners are getting pissed by now, am only doing it now because the swede fucked up(i bumped it far longer, don't worry sven).

And, seriously dude?, comparing sweden to Japan? Comparing everything to Sweden or Canada, ever?

>>304445
>Fuck dude, why do you keep loosing the point?, you were supposed to answer why the authoritarian system of the USSR was only slightly better than Putin and thus it was worth the gamble, FROM your perspective of Jewish interests.
I didn't quite understand your wording the first time, apologies. ok, so the authoritarian system of the USSR - well, first off it was slightly better than Putin, at least in it's 90s form, in that it did that all-important de-toothing I was talking about. job security, public utilities, that sort of thing is immensely essential to keeping people "in check", as it were. Putin's Russia is much less good at this, and favors Orthodox religion to boot, which adds up to a mixture of both a lack of a safety net and a saving religion, which I think is a fairly dangerous thing to play with because it begins dividing people into not just have and have nots, and not just pious and impious, but worthy and unworthy. luckily Russia remains relatively secular, but I think Putin's working on changing that. in terms of the risk, though, as I said there were several risks along the road, and a part of what made the very earliest risk - actions prior to 1917 - worth it was the possibility of something a bit more permissive, more perhaps on the Makhno end of things. I don't disagree that many of the early actions of Lenin's government and the red army were necessary for the emerging regime's survival, but I mean more in terms of determining the direction the USSR would move in after survival had been procured. as it turned out eventually, I'd say it achieved about half a job, as to me I reckon the real key to my people's safety and security is in undermining work itself, so that people, rather than "working hard", merely keep the cogs turning. however it was missing what today we really rely on, which is in a sense luxuries, though today perhaps their availability makes them something else. stuff like fast food, entertainment, that sort of thing, these create the contentedness that I think is more effective than any kind of censorship at keeping people from threatening us. and I recognize that there is this aversion many of you have to such a "caged" existence, but it's not really something I understand. I don't know what objection people could have to a comfortable, cared for existence in which they barely have to do anything - sure, on some level it's about keeping a population complacent, and therefore compliant, but from my perspective it also seems very benevolent, since it's exactly what I'd want.
>Anyways it was an interesting talk, i won't be replying anymore because poners are getting pissed by now
sorry to see you go bud
>And, seriously dude?, comparing sweden to Japan? Comparing everything to Sweden or Canada, ever?
I only did it cause he's a Swede, and that's really the key to what I was trying to get him to see. it's easy to talk about "x is y" when you've never been somewhere.

>>304293
No, that is not what I do towards my race. I study the positives, negatives, benefits, downsides, consequences, goals, motivations, so I am able to make the least biased decision possible. My 'race' is a polluted nightmare where Animal Farm and 1984 have inbred into each other. 90% are a combination of too stupid, too unable, too unwilling, too cowardly, or all of the prior to act in decent, humane manners. Much of that blame falls upo- oh, wait, you know exactly (((who))) is to blame.

Screeching: "I'M A JEW SO TREAT ME BETTER THAN ANYONE ELSE BECAUSE I'M A JEW, I'M SPECIAL, SO WHY DON'T YOU SUBMIT AND LICK MY BOOTS?" is a tarnished, lousy attempt at enforcing standard religio-propagandist judaic nonsense. You cannot signal boost a wavelength that is dying out. Ironically kikes are killing themselves via multiculturalism, wymyn'z rights, and degeneracy. Suffocating on their own dreck, as it were.

Now let's get down to the real problem: the holohoax did not happen. It could not have occurred in the ways nor means that the (((allies))), especially the cucked ruskies, proclaimed. All of the """death camps""" inspected solely by the soviets? "DEATH CAMPS! SIX GORILLION! HORRIBLE MEDICAL EXPERIMENTS!" Then, immediately after they were inspected by US forces: "LABOR CAMPS! BAD CONDITIONS! (JUST DON'T TELL THE PUBLIC THAT WE BOMBED ALL THOSE TRAIN LINES SUPPLYING THE CAMPS WITH FOOD, MEDICAL SUPPLIES, AND THE LIFE SAVING ZYKLON-B THOUGH!" The only (((data))) shown so far are hysterically inaccurate film clips of massacres and starvation deaths that did not occur in Germany, Austria, or Poland. Include the deliberately doctored 'photos', ie: sight bytes, and thus begins the (((cultured outrage))) of dumbfuck goyim mutts around teh world screeching: "HUNS !!BAD!! but WE GOOD!" Hrm, I have a rebuttal: the >13,500,000 wartime German, Italian, and Japanese women, mostly under the age of 30, whom were raped, tortured, slaughtered, executed, murdered, solely for (((getting revenge for the jew!))) Adolf Hitler was not responsible for the holohoax. Whom is? That blame lies solely upon MI5/6, FDR, Cuckshill the pedophile drunk, and worldwide kikery shilling their fucktarded propaganda. How many jews DID die? 272,000 to 282,000 according to the Red Cross 1982ACE archive release. Clearly, not enough.

As for your problem? You have not answered a single question without acting offended. Do you also rub your hands together scheming on how best to lie in a manner that will ensure you won't be caught and called out? Do you simply hope that I will give up even though most explicitly know how to deal with (((your kind)))? When challenged, your recourses are immediate based upon assumptions and presumptions ie: whataboutism, moving the historical goalposts by claiming 'X also did Y so you should pay attention to that cuz it's REALLY SIMILAR YA KNOW', and derail from the blatantly direct topic.

tld;r: you are your own worst enemy. You are, at minimum, mildly cognizant of why das juden can no longer be considered 'human'. Yet, you type to protect them as if such criminality OUGHT be defended.

>>304453
the 21 questions. in fact I went over the first one a little bit earlier, I mentioned the Soviets primarily consulting those who worked on the V2 rockets for their missile program - these were Jews who were used to build some of the components of the V2 in their concentration camps. so the answer to the first question is simple: the Nazis did not, in fact, have a policy of killing EVERY Jew that they had, indeed as many who point out the "furnace problem" of not being able to burn that many bodies in that amount of time, they would not be able to kill them all at once.
2. with regard to these, I've only actually read Churchill's. and these aren't books that document history from 1933 to 1946, they're the story of these people's lives, so for examples Churchill doesn't mention the Nanking massacre either, but it's because he's writing from his perspective, and from his perspective during the time he didn't know about the holocaust - could he have mentioned it in passing as a matter of reflection? sure, but I don't think it's so remarkable that he didn't, and as I said with Nanking, there's plenty he left out.
3. a death camp, as previously stated, does not mean "immediate death". an infirmary is to treat wounds, and while these Jews were alive the Germans wanted them working. as for the brothel - I mean, would you care that they had a brothel if you knew they were gonna die? it's the kind of thing I wouldn't be surprised if they let be.
4. a bullet on the spot was what was more common. the germans would dig a trench, and shoot Jews into it on the spot. essentially there were special divisions whose job it was to go and hunt out Jews along the warpath of the army. in fact it may even be fair to say that the majority of Jews in the holocaust died in this manner.
5. the same reason you find minor zyklon b residue in some chambers but not in others: they tried to cover up evidence. burning documents, scrubbing walls, etc. we do have some german documented evidence in fact, but I don't think you'd find it very convincing, it's mainly train schedules (you'd say it proves they were just work camps) and photographs (you'd say they were altered).
6. somewhere between 4 and 6 million works just fine as an estimate, personally the number I'm familiar with is 5.8 million. and I do agree that the difference is important, the reason why we work with the estimate instead of verifying for sure is that it would be a ton of work to examine every recovered body individually, and even then there'd be a lot left out, like the shot Jews left buried out in Russia.
7. while it's true that we don't have records of pertinent communication for Auschwitz specifically, wouldn't the Hoefle telegram count as a confirmation that camps did report on their extermination progress?
8. that's a fair point. it's totally possible that there weren't as many victims at Auschwitz than we think, and it's worth establishing for the historical record exactly how many there actually were.
9. but there are still gas chambers at those camps? whoever says that all death camps were in Poland is full of shit.
10. well first of all, these witness testimonies may well be invalid, but also, I'm not sure about how exactly concentrations of zyklon b work. are the effects stated there for a use of a normal concentration? because as other holocaust deniers will eagerly point out, zyklon b can be used at a much lower concentration to kill people (and then by pointing at some of the zyklon b residue, they therefore conclude that this proves they were using it at a concentration way too high to be efficiently killing people, and thus it must have been being used as a disinfectant... but of course, that's precisely why residue is so absent from a lot of the walls of chambers, which they fail to mention).
11. yes. indeed I mentioned earlier the claim that the Germans rolled Jews into an electrocution chamber on a conveyor belt, and from the look of it, it seems likely that particular story was made up wholesale by some bored journalist in Chicago. there were a lot of stupid stories going around as the holocaust was being uncovered, I would imagine that these are among them.
12. I went over that above. and sure, Nuremberg was a contravention of justice, I won't deny that, but the mere fact that Nuremberg was a sham doesn't alone prove anything.
14. who's to say he was ever there? all we know is Hungary supposedly deported him there, and he got a tattoo. anybody could have given him that tattoo, and he easily could have given authorities the slip when he was ordered to be deported. I think that in that particular case, Elie probably avoided the holocaust altogether, and simply lied about it later for attention.
15. it's not impossible, he was doing batch experimentation after all.
16. what about the Staffordshire University team? they went to Treblinka and actually excavated some mass graves. whoever did that sonar study had shitty equipment.
17. well for one, mr Simpson was just one man, without much ability to hide evidence as just the one man. this is a fair criticism, though, there is relatively little hard evidence, and I think we ought to be working hard on finding more.
18. the holocaust revisionism being made illegal deal is one of the stupidest things on earth. I wouldn't be surprised if all holocaust revisionism today was the result of these braindead laws outlawing it. I have no defence or justification for these laws, they are blatant and unfair violations of human rights.
19. there have been people with degrees to claim those things, yes.
20. I heard such a concern expressed on talkernate history, I think it's mostly a matter of personal opinion.
21. well, either they saw incorrectly, have faulty memories, mistook some unrelated smoke for the crematorium, or they were never there and made it up for attention. sadly a great number of testimonies may well just be made up, we need to have a better system of verifying these stories.

>>304453
with the second picture, that's the original article, yes, but not the actual photograph original. to me, it looks like they simply brushed out the guy for the paper - after all, he's more exposed than the others, and there were strict decency standards and such in that time. the third picture is quite interesting - those certainly do seem like faked photos. I doubt that all photos from that time were similarly faked, but it's not impossible. it makes a very good point. fourth picture made me chuckle - these elderly brits certainly are not "woke to the JQ", as it were. after all, what conclusion could you take from MP Rothschild and Prime Minister Disraeli as a JQ believer if not that the British Empire was a total Jewish puppet? it'd be a joke not to think this was the inevitable course Britain would take as a JQ believer. fifth picture - and we start off with the Nazi New Order in Poland. yes, I've come across it before - it costs over £500 to get a copy from what I've seen, but regardless it was an internal matter of the left book club, hardly a reliable source on anything, especially since it was written before the war's end. and as one of the news stories in this image points out, these are mostly fake witness testimonies. it is bound to happen - certainly compelling that they are fake, however I do not think that it demonstrates that the whole thing was fake.
>90% are a combination of too stupid, too unable, too unwilling, too cowardly, or all of the prior to act in decent, humane manners. Much of that blame falls upo- oh, wait, you know exactly (((who))) is to blame.
personally, I prefer you Americans to Brits. I think we were a net positive on you, if anything.
>Screeching: "I'M A JEW SO TREAT ME BETTER THAN ANYONE ELSE BECAUSE I'M A JEW, I'M SPECIAL, SO WHY DON'T YOU SUBMIT AND LICK MY BOOTS?" is a tarnished, lousy attempt at enforcing standard religio-propagandist judaic nonsense. You cannot signal boost a wavelength that is dying out. Ironically kikes are killing themselves via multiculturalism, wymyn'z rights, and degeneracy. Suffocating on their own dreck, as it were.
I don't see it as suffocation, I'm really rather happy with it.
>Then, immediately after they were inspected by US forces: "LABOR CAMPS! BAD CONDITIONS! (JUST DON'T TELL THE PUBLIC THAT WE BOMBED ALL THOSE TRAIN LINES SUPPLYING THE CAMPS WITH FOOD, MEDICAL SUPPLIES, AND THE LIFE SAVING ZYKLON-B THOUGH!"
I would say they were camps used both for execution and for labor - it is still understood that they were used for gassings, after all, those are the places you can go inside the chambers. as for bombing the train lines - now, I certainly don't mind you using this particular explanation for the deaths of the holocaust, but I'd first like to point out that it's exactly the same sort of point holodomor deniers use. "w-well the gula- I mean normal prisons just happened to be in siberia for no particular reason, so all these deaths were due to transport problems cause it all relied on trans siberian railway, and exposure too", and it's like, yeah no shit, Russians put them all the way out there so they could kill them with less uproar about it. fact of the matter is, if the Germans wanted to merely lock up the Jews, they'd already done that - it was called the ghettos. even if the deaths in the camps truly were due to just allied bombing of supply lines, it was still a German choice to move them into the wilderness for no discernible good reason (unless, shocker, they were killing them) that lead to the shortage of supply, certainly more than the allies, who were merely bombing what looked like good targets.
>272,000 to 282,000 according to the Red Cross 1982ACE archive release.
those were recovered death certificates - that is, IMMEDIATELY verifiable deaths, to give the families that escaped to other countries closure on the status of their loved ones. it is not the red cross's job to tally death tolls, they are a healthcare organization first and foremost.
>Do you also rub your hands together
I actually do do this quite a bit, it makes me laugh just thinking about looking like le happy merchant. plus, it kind of makes me feel powerful - I have basically no agency in my life, so it's fun to think of myself as a powerful secretive conspirator, hands rubbing in gleeful malice.
>on how best to lie in a manner that will ensure you won't be caught and called out?
it's not a lie if you believe in what you're saying.
>Do you simply hope that I will give up even though most explicitly know how to deal with (((your kind)))?
of course not, I'm enjoying this exchange, I don't want you to give up. I've made a few concessions in this post, focus in on them and go for the kill.
>When challenged, your recourses are immediate based upon assumptions and presumptions ie: whataboutism, moving the historical goalposts by claiming 'X also did Y so you should pay attention to that cuz it's REALLY SIMILAR YA KNOW', and derail from the blatantly direct topic.
whenever I do that, point it out, and treat it as a win, because that is what it is. whenever I make a fallacy, the point goes to you.
>tld;r: you are your own worst enemy. You are, at minimum, mildly cognizant of why das juden can no longer be considered 'human'. Yet, you type to protect them as if such criminality OUGHT be defended.
well, I do think our actions ought to be defended, I think we've been primarily a force for good in this world. even though I understand you and the rest of your kind didn't and probably never will appreciate it, I think we made life a lot better for all of you. before we came along, you'd die in some war the fatherland, after having lived in a loveless arranged marriage with a throng of children that were brought up more by theocratic vicars than by you, paddled and forced to kneel on gravel for questioning church doctrine, and sent to school to learn why the king was god. what life is that? you're all better off as you are now, trust me.

>>304466
>well, I do think our actions ought to be defended, I think we've been primarily a force for good in this world. even though I understand you and the rest of your kind didn't and probably never will appreciate it, I think we made life a lot better for all of you.
Made life better for us!? Talk about delusions of grandeur. You poison us chemically, brainwash us into self-hatred and obsessive materialism. Enslave us with usury, devalue our labour with inflation; destroy our families, our children, our women, our traditions, our culture. You inbred rat scum deserve nothing less than a real holocaust for what you've done to us.
>before we came along, you'd die in some war the fatherland, after having lived in a loveless arranged marriage with a throng of children that were brought up more by theocratic vicars than by you, paddled and forced to kneel on gravel for questioning church doctrine, and sent to school to learn why the king was god. what life is that? you're all better off as you are now, trust me.
I'd rather die in a righteous war and have a chance to fight a real enemy than live on my fucking knees in this slow, painful decent into jew hell for "comfort". The church is another institution you pieces of human garbage foisted upon Europeans. I'd argue that it was the prototype of Bolshevism. We are also already there with a modern day version of "questioning the church doctrine". We live in an age where questioning any poorly constructed jew lie is met with a swarm of FBInigger mercenaries at your door, so you're wrong nigger. Shit is worse now than its every been.

>>304475
> You poison us chemically, brainwash us into self-hatred and obsessive materialism. Enslave us with usury, devalue our labour with inflation; destroy our families, our children, our women, our traditions, our culture.
those are all things I'm perfectly happy with. I spend my day eating mcdonalds, drinking coke, watching anime, fapping to hentai, and I will always be a virgin NEET. no culture, no family, no children, and happily "poisoned" and "brainwashed". I'm happy with that perfectly nice and happy life that I lead, why can't you be satisfied with that? it's the all-too dangerous white ambitionn at work again, I wager. your ceaseless energy, driving you to work out, fight, procreate, on and on and on... it must be exhausting to be white, I couldn't bear it.
>You inbred rat scum deserve nothing less than a real holocaust for what you've done to us.
I wouldn't mind, tbh. I'm pretty indifferent in some ways, I mean it is your countries and all, it wouldn't really be that beyond the pale to get rid of us. I'd obviously prefer that you did not, but I wouldn't resent you for getting rid of us. besides, all you whites keep trying to get me to engage with life and stuff anyway, as I said before it's pretty draining to live amongst whites.
>I'd rather die in a righteous war and have a chance to fight a real enemy than live on my fucking knees in this slow, painful decent into jew hell for "comfort".
that's not something I understand at all. sounds like a warrior mentality - somewhat primitive, I have to say. if I engaged in fights with "honor" or whatever I'd probably be dead before leaving high school, people who don't flee and hide just die out.
>The church is another institution you pieces of human garbage foisted upon Europeans. I'd argue that it was the prototype of Bolshevism.
oh, you're that variety, are you? I don't have anything to do with churches - I might go once a month or so, mainly because they have coffee and biscuits and stuff, plus elderly whites are some of the only members of your kind worth conversing with. and as I was saying to the other brit in this thread, I suppose I regard myself as a messianic jew, but the organized church is an absolute plague that needs to be cured. you're right about it being the prototype of bolshevism in some ways though (not in the way you think, however). the organized church was never true to actual beliefs of course, but the works of Rabbis Khein, Tamares and Alexandrov were the beginning of the religious fusion of Judaism with the left that led to the rise of some of the good varities of Bolshevism, and on the christian side of things there was the munster rebellion and the peasant's rebellion, but in both cases it was opposed by the conservative (read: atheist) rabbis and the catholic church respectively. so I'd really phrase it more as that Bolshevism arose out of the true believers rising up against the corrupt, unbelieving church structure.
>We live in an age where questioning any poorly constructed jew lie is met with a swarm of FBInword mercenaries at your door, so you're wrong nword.
that is unfortunate, I agree, but try not doing that for just one second, and it's a very comfy existence. I have a degree of immunity from that, of course (though I did get beaten up in school for using the N word), but I could easily give up "da troof" for my nice, comfy NEET life.

>>304466
Kek
>what life is that? you're all better off as you are now, trust me.
Aw that's cute. You really have no idea how anything works.
Well since you have your hill that you may run around, what exactly did Jews do to make that amazing life.
Well I for one can't keep the smile off my face.

>>304477
>Aw that's cute. You really have no idea how anything works.
I can't say I've experienced a lot of life, I guess.
>Well since you have your hill that you may run around, what exactly did Jews do to make that amazing life.
well, we spread the addictive forms of media that keep people entertained through life, we spread the tasty snack and fast food that keep people happily fed, we produced and honed the modern consumer system that makes people so comfortable that they never even need to leave their houses. we didn't invent any of it, to be sure, you whites invented all the components, but we put it together into the modern system it is today. and you're all worried about us introducing UBI soon too, looking at the "great reset thread", but the actual effect of this, besides making you safe and docile, will be that you will want for nothing. your survival will be taken care of, and you'll be free to do whatever you want - it doesn't sound that evil to me. not to mention porn - you already know of our involvement there, of course, and that makes everything so much easier. no need to go out and deal with interacting with women. we made sexual satisfaction efficient! almost everything we've done has made your lives easier and more comfortable, and while it's in service of our own goals too, don't you want to be safe and cared for?

>>304480
nope.

>>304478
Since you're here what would you do in you're best case / worst case senario.
Like what kind of anime or snacks would you get?

>>304482
well, I like mecha a lot, from gundam to lesser known stuff like mazinger, voltes v and giant gorg. but I tend to mix it up with moe and loli stuff. in terms of snacks, right at this moment I have some kettles crisps and a few boxes of chocolate brunch bars. I'm drinking cordial for now, but as soon as I can go back up to the shop I'll be getting some soda again.

>>304439
>I recognize that you don't want people who disagree with you posting here, however I think you were always testing it with the "porn deterrent" idea. a community that claims to have natural protection is an interesting hornet's nest to poke, after all.
My problem is, and always has been, that you had been acting stuck up. Your problems with the board being your own.

10/10 full marks on predictive capabilities. I am absolutely throbbing, throbbing I tell you. Poner--- was a prophet he said that

State education.
When the curricula veers away from education to indoctrination.
https://twitter.com/jackmurphylive/status/1375081263720230919 [Embed]

Nick Fuentes on conservatives who are unwilling to discuss race and insist the problem is merely economic.

Demoralization.

In every part of the White world we are indoctrinate to put everyone else’s interests ahead of our own.

Nick Fuentes on the effects of diversity versus socialism and communism.

Chanequa hates all Whites who are not racked with racial guilt and self-loathing.
Chanequa Walker-Barnes was born in Atlanta, Georgia. A theologian and psychologist, her mission is to serve as a catalyst for healing, justice, and reconciliation. She has served on the faculties of Mercer University, Shaw University, University of Florida, and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

>>305558
I feel like anyone who refers to themselves as "Dr." but uses their first name instead of their last forfeits all right to be taken seriously. I'm frankly starting to believe that Chanequa may not even be a real medical professional.

>>305583
>I'm frankly starting to believe that Chanequa may not even be a real medical professional.
>psychologist
It's a charlatan.

>>305593
Psychology is the field of accepting what the current regime believes to be unquestionably true and reinforcing the lies/enforcing their commandments.
No psychologist accepted by the left-dominated mainstream academia will remain accepted for long if they come out as too non-leftist.

>>304464
>>304466
>still can't answer questions honestly without resorting to outright lies & propaganda
>more gaslighting
>more deflection
>more arguments from !!woke!! kike authority
>more arguments from absurdity
>more backpedaling
>more pandering to false witnesses
>inability to comprehend basic logic without emotionally screeching "B-B-B-BUT WE R DA GEWD KIKEZ"
Wow. Really didn't take much for you to prove the point that all kikes are worthless bootlicking cucks that must be gassed. Good job, AGAIN. You simply can't help outing yourself. You are literally Nigel the faggot jew, except even MORE jewed.

>>305597
>Psychology is the field of accepting what the current regime believes to be unquestionably true and reinforcing the lies/enforcing their commandments.
Not inherently so, though its current paradigm of behaviorism (the belief that nothing inside the mind can be directly tested, only external behaviors) is certainly not helping their case.

>No psychologist accepted by the left-dominated mainstream academia will remain accepted for long if they come out as too non-leftist.
While this may be true, it hasn't been long since the American Psychological Association was giving tips to three letters at Guantanamo Bay and elsewhere about how to psychologically torture people with maximum efficacy. It's really more of a corporate establishment thing; the "purity spiral" you're referring to just happens to occur most effectively where the left has taken root.

https://blogs.adams.edu/thepawprint/american-psychological-association-in-guantanamo/
>The report goes on to confirm actions that the White House has already admitted to. Specifically that the Central Intelligence Agency and US Military utilized waterboarding, sleep deprivation, sensory deprivation, extreme stress positions, nudity and sexual degradation, and threatening with dog attacks across “numerous instances and numerous theatres.” Left out of the report is that almost all of these techniques were designed with the complicit assistance of the American Psychological Association (APA), something that should shame any and all psychological professionals.

https://outsidertheory.com/right-marcuseanism/
>In contrast to the authoritarian societies of the past, Marcuse argues, what he calls “totalitarian democracy” bestows formal freedoms on its subjects – but these are ultimately illusory, because the overwhelming propagandistic force of technological mass media to tip the scales in favor of the dominant social forces. In his terms, “with the concentration of economic and political power and the integration of opposites in a society which uses technology as an instrument of domination, effective dissent is blocked where it could freely emerge;
>As a result, “those minorities which strive for a change [may] be left free to deliberate and discuss, to speak and to assemble.” However, they “will be left harmless and helpless in the face of the overwhelming majority, which militates against qualitative social change” because of its indoctrination into dominant values.
>On the other hand, if the policy of “discriminating tolerance” proves effective at weakening the right politically, another question emerges. Marcuse’s argument proceeded from the assumption that the entire culture industry, with its vast propagandistic capacity, was aligned with “the right,” not because of the political sympathies of those who worked in the industry, but because its entire raison d’être was to ideologically reproduce capitalist relations. The culture industry, from this perspective, cannot challenge the dominant forces of society because it is itself one of those forces. Hence, from Marcuse’s point of view, it’s essentially unimaginable that media and technology corporations could under any conditions be the vanguard of “liberating tolerance.” That is because they are de facto working in the interests of the ruling elite that they form part of. If such entities are pursuing what looks like a progressive agenda now, that would imply that such an agenda has somehow become useful to the latter.
>Today’s Marcusean advocates of “liberating tolerance,” then, find themselves in the peculiar position of being materially and institutionally aligned with the very sectors of society that he saw as arrayed against the possibility of any real progress. The result of this situation has been the rise to prominence of a “right Marcuseanism” that also promotes the abandonment of “pure tolerance.” For a long time, the typical stance of many conservatives was to decry their exclusion from culturally and ideologically powerful institutions – the media, entertainment, education – by appealing to the supposed neutrality and fairness of those institutions and demanding they live up to the liberal ideal of “pure tolerance.” Conversely, it has lately become common for some on the right to reject such liberal ideals altogether – which places them quite close to Marcuse’s position.

Tolerance and apathy are the last virtues of a dying society.

Calling it "cultural Marxism" seems like an oxymoron the more I think about it. Hopefully not as destructive as calling the Chinese democide of the 50s "the Great Leap Forward," but it belongs in the same class of misrepresentations.
It's not "cultural" at all. It's anticultural. That's like calling it "cancel culture" or the "cultural revolution." It exists to destroy culture, not change it or make it better. It would make more sense to think of the former as a verb than a descriptor. How about corporate Marxism instead? That would distinguish it from the anti-economic Marxism of the previous centuries. Calling it racial or identity Marxism is about as accurate as calling it Russian or Chinese Marxism. According to Marxists those nations shouldn't exist, much like race or identity.
Or just call them anticulturists. But calling it in any way "cultural" just sits wrong with me.

>>306007
Well, since you want to redefine terminology, let's see what it is about.

>>306008
Not exactly sure why I would need to know about where it came from to advocate for a change in terminology.

>>306009
Change for the change' sake only suits you, but will confuse the rest.

>>306007
>It's not "cultural" at all.
Actually it is; it makes sense to marxists, it is the culture they want and therefore is called "cultural marxism".

>>306010
I would be okay with that. Why work to be intelligible to the anticulturalists anyway? Without meaning to be coming across as callous, it kind of sounds like their problem.

>>306011
What culture?

>>306012
>What culture?
The described at >>306008
All western culture and values are flipped upside down. The goal if you didn't notice it yet, is the dispossession and elimination of Whites.

>>306013
And their culture, perhaps? To be replaced with what?

>>306014
>To be replaced with what?
With an obedient rootless mongrel race overpowering the last pockets of irrelevant Whites. This is Plan Kalergi 101.

>>306014
Looks like we're talking past each other here fren. Whatever culture they can come up with is incredibly lowbrow and doesn't meet the standards that have been upheld for centuries by the West thus far. Perhaps I may have had a misconception as to the differing definitions of "culture" were, but to associate anything with what the communists have done over the years with high art, even connotatively (other than to flat out call it anticultural) is going to leave a bad taste in my mouth, and I'd rather call it something else. I prefer not to call it culture. To myself, it is anticulture.

>>306016
>Whatever culture they can come up with is incredibly lowbrow and doesn't meet the standards
But it will be perfectly suitable for non-Whites and mongrels, look at NYC, London and many other invaders' hubs.
They, be latino, muslims or african or asian, accept any degeneracy, any assault to their countries original values for cookies and perks. They are perfect global citizens.

>>306017
>muslims are perfect global citizens
i thought most mudslimes are ultra conservatives and they want to implement sharia law everywhere, no?

This man says it all!

>>306364
Is there true Sharia in lands conquered by Islam, or a compromise between it and a more sustainable level of totalitarianism?
Muslims only get along when pointed at an enemy to attack or a civilized society to destroy. When the jews want them to split up and fight wars over what parts of their blood-soaked sandnigger bible they should and should not be forced to follow and who gets to be king of the mudslimes, they do so.
They are stupid and evil.
Describing them as "ultra conservatives" is an insult to conservativism. Then again, conservatives are cowardly cucks who love compromise. Still, surely you don't think all political ideologies exist on a one-way axis between liberals and conservatives, right?

>>306919
Muslims, niggers, even Whites; when the kikes flash the sheckels all pretenses fall.

Critical Race Theory in classrooms.
>Tucker reads 'angry' parent's letter to 'woke' private school
[YouTube] Tucker reads 'angry' parent's letter to 'woke' private school [Embed]

>>301887
>>301941
>>301987
>Coca-Cola
>boycott
It's building up folks.

>Removing Coca-Cola From Our Lives is a Win Anyway
>They will only respect us when they fear us, and for that, we need to achieve a confirmed kill and parade the severed head through the streets followed by a cheering multitude. At that point only will they begin to treat us like non-disposable people.
http://www.amerika.org/politics/removing-coca-cola-from-our-lives-is-a-win-anyway/

>>307379
"Let's be White, boycott Sprite."

>gaslighting White children
It's time we put an end to these wicked demons.