588 replies and 509 files omitted.
Is He dare I say..../OurGuy/?
Multiple levels of irony, politically incorrect, larping as the other side: That's /pol/ alright.
non-metaphorically this here stonetoss
Communism only works in an infallible world. Unfortunately we live in a fallible world where someone will take advantage of the system. It will never ever work. Karl Marx never worked a day in a life in a factory. I worked at FedEx as someone who loaded the trailers and knows what a hard days work is. I can't believe lazy idiots believe in Karl Marx ideas at all. Also it doesn't help we are current's in an economic Neo-feudalistic society
When You Open Your Eyes And See What's In Plain Sight.
It appears these cards came out around 2016 based on an image search.
>>340387>Communism only works in an infallible world.
why do you give it that much? why say it doesn't work even in an infallible world? if you say it works in an infallible world, that implies that it very nearly works, and just needs a few capitalistic tweaks. everyone always says that it works "in a perfect world" or "on paper", but does it actually? all communists will hear when you say that is that communism mostly works. the way this common phrase is worded seems to be intended to imply good things about communism, wouldn't you say?
Saying that it only works in an infallible world implies that it will never work in a fallible one, no matter how many tweaks you make to it. No more, no less.
>infallibility is 'just a couple tweaks' to Capitalism
Is this a parody?
Maybe I'm stupid but what is the significance of this?
Fucking lol. I wouldn't have noticed that if I'd stared at it all day.
"Act as schizo and moralfaggy as them" doesn't really win out
Faggots cannot be trusted around kids
No it isn't, and it's not a sexuality, it's just normal. Girls get periods at 12, historically girls got married at 12-16, the AOC in the US in 1880 was 7-12 by state. Libtarded moralfagging
>>341058>the AOC in the US in 1880 was 7-12 by state
Yeah, but you forgot to mention that women at that time were property and not a freelance whores as they are today.
Why's that related?>>341091
Angry with no point generally means you're the one coping
Parent starts reading the grooming material her kids' school is teaching, school board member shuts down.
The best part is the poor sign language interpretter in the corner who's cringing the whole time as she acts it out.
>>341095>Why's that related?
It is absolutely much related as involves which roles women will get as functional members of a community.
Either they function as women, or as men. Both roles cannot come together and properly be played.
What does that have to do with schizos virtue signalling about wanting to kill pedos? Men are attracted to young girls, that's natural, there's nothing wrong with it, and that's it
When women were property, the custody and therefore property, was transferred from the father to the husband, being the last the new tutor and guarantor of that woman safety.
Today the bureaucracy had messed all that and by means of intimidation and violence gives freewill to young women to squander their sexuality around.
Okay, I don't really disagree, but you didn't answer how that's related
Precisely into restrict women' sexuality towards a productive outcome: to make children and nothing else. For that the patriarchal family institution plays the key role.
>>341076>women at that time were property
They were not legally property in the 1880's.
Not to the extend of animal property, but close enough for guaranteeing that the ladies won't make the wrong personal choices.
Yeah, except that's not the same as property. Law had very little to do in that case, as it was really only enforced by social norms.
Put it this way: a property with human rights. Like the relation of parents and children.
Yeah, although it's still pretty different as far as U.S. law is concerned. Property is a legal term. They even had that SCOTUS ruling that established the legal rammifications of what what kind of rights you have when you're considered property: zero.
It's kind of nitpicky, but "property" is a rather specific term with exact legal implications. What it really was is that women adhered to social tradition, not legal specification, and did what their families expected of them.
Forget about that, it is a body meant to certificate oligarch policies and only has the legitimacy of the gun on which is backed.
Natural and Common Law is the path.
>>341095>Y-Y-You're the one coping
I look forward to hanging you.
You won't be saying that when you get hanged, pedophile.
Then "property" might not be the best term to use anyway. You're talking about tradition, not law.
You need that final word as le internet tough guy exactly because it's as much of a cope as when a libtard sees crime stats, emotional and boring
I'm right and little girls will always be best
By "common law", what do you mean? I understand it as law derivative of judicial precedent.
Learn to stop feeding the trolls.
>>341130>I'm right and little girls will always be best
Only if property right are restored as before, not before.
All of you need to die. I hate this site now, you faggots killed it.
Ye, okay. They actually support each other. Early marriage means, very obviously, sooner (more) kids, less promiscuity and stronger bonding>>341134
I'm not trolling. Ask me anything and I'll give you a good answer>>341136
Oh No Horse pussy! its not like I've seen it for 5 years straight.
Grow some skin. Did you seethe all over the thread when you met obnoxious people on 4chan too?
No, I always knew 4cuck was a shithole having grown up on it. but mlpol used to be a community that was based on friendship, this is like niggers moving into your neighborhood and shitting everything up. its no longer the same website from 5 years ago, its changed for the worse.
It's not going to get better by engaging faggots whenever they start shitposting. Just hide, ignore and move on.
>>341151>mlpol used to be a community that was based on friendship
It is, but because you are a spineless faggot you are too sensible to this site.
Derpibooru may cater your sensibilities better.>>>/derpibooru/
So what are you going to do about it? Are you just going to bitch about it, or are you going to make it better?
This site's quality has stagnated because people just sit around and complain about things without posting any actual content. On some months it feels like I'm the only one actually making news threads for weeks, and don't get me started on lack of ponies.
I wish there were still /pol/ edits for zyklon ben's boomer art
Nah thats the PTA /pol/ troll
The main stream right is for it too.
Demonic cunt argues her case to kill a baby.
Former abortionist describes performing a second trimester abortion.
the pro abortion lobby isnt used to actually arguing their points directly at people that disagree. they survive by means of deception and suppression. because of this they they dont understand their oppositions argument. most of them dont even know why people oppose abortion. so they come up with these counter arguments someone told them, unaware that it has nothing to do with why their opposition disagrees.
One side shouts "abortion is murder" and one side shouts "its a womans right". But both agree women dont have a right to murder. but the argument is never about if abortion is murder or not and it very clearly is.
The easiest argument is to just compare the differences between an abortion and a premature delivery. the baby is removed from the mother in both cases and she's freed from this "burden" even if it means the babies life may end in the process, but the difference is the abortion makes sure the baby doesnt survive. if the baby accidentally survives, they call the abortion "botched".
They could easily just remove the baby without intentionally destroying it.
A good 4 decades ago my mum worked in a premature baby unit. If a baby did not cry out for feeding it was deemed o.k. for it to starve to death. Things have moved on but there will always be a line between life and bucket of human remains.
>>343142>If a baby did not cry out for feeding it was deemed o.k. for it to starve to death.>women in charge
Think about it, it looks like they are natural born killers. We are lucky our mothers didn't kill us when they could.
Sean Last refuting the argument that social attitudes are the only reason homosexuals commit suicide at higher rates.
>>344870>Fagets killing themselves
The talker needs to address how to increase the death rate.