/mlpol/ - My Little Politics


Welcome to the new code.
If you want to see the latest posts from all boards in a convenient way please check out /overboard/
Note: JS is required to be able to post, but I am working on a system where that won't be needed.

Name
Email
Subject
By clicking New Reply, I acknowledge the existence of the Israeli nuclear arsenal.
Comment
0
Select File / Oekaki
File(s)
Password (For file and/or post deletion.)

1780311__explicit_grimdark_artist-colon-shinodage_copper top_abuse_anal_anal creampie_blushing_bondage_bottomless_clothes_cloth gag_copperbuse_creampie.png
Police
Anonymous
NYhUT
?
No.240413
240414 240415 240420 240437 240451 240476 240477 240482 240495 240522 241325 242038 242337 244891 256115 270520
What opinions do you anons have towards law enforcement officers? I've seen cops called ZOGbots here, but I've also seen anons express sympathy towards them. I'm sort of cynical towards them. They've repeatedly failed to defend people from bodily or property damage by criminals, from not preventing Stalinistic terrorists from comitting thuggery in Berkeley, Charlottesville, Portland, etc, to failing to prevent black riots from getting out of hand, to failing to intervene against mass shooters, like in Broward. They mostly only "protect and serve" a small oligarchic group of individuals and their interests, which makes sense because that's who pays them (although, if I want to be precise, it is really the tax cattle paying them.) It also seems pathetic how many boomercons LARP about being like the Founding Fathers and saying they'd fight the government if it tried to confiscate their firearms while worshipping the police and military. Of course, this isn't to endorse any sort of violent action against the police, many of whom have been misled and decieved like the normies who trust them.
251 replies and 198 files omitted.
Anonymous
c13da0d
?
No.281780
281829
>>281759
>If you don't see it yet, this is the main reason why governments' gangs need to be disarmed.
Except that these retards fail to understand that law enforcement officers are held to a list of rules and laws as well, not the whims of the public. Meaning the police cannot function as someone's personal army. And, if they break those regulations, the officer can be suspended, or even imprisoned. That's part of why these riots are so hilarious to watch.

In the U.S., at least, why don't you go after the people attempting to change the laws, rather than the people enforcing the country's laws?
>Remember, Jesus was tortured and killed by law enforcement.
You mean the law enforcement officers who sent Christ to several different cities to be tried, could not find him breaking any laws (Even the most obscure ones), were going to let him go for finding him breaking no laws, even just roughed him up a bit and then were going to let him go just to appease the pharisees, even gave people the option between releasing the innocent Christ or one of the surviving revolutionaries who were still imprisoned after a failed coup, and the pharisees responded by swaying the public towards calling for Christ's execution? Which the Romans begrudgingly complied with, and washed their hands of the incident, because it was the "will of the people" who passed judgement upon Christ's fate. Not the rules and laws of the government as they did everything they could to get him off.

Yes, that sounds more like a mob rule rather than an out-of-control police force. If you wanted to use an example of the corruption in Roman law, you could not have found a worse example. And, there certainly is better examples that you could have pulled from as Rome did away with much of the "checks and balances" when Caesar came to power. The trial of Christ showed that the system worked, but the people didn't want that. And, that's similar to what's happening now. The baizuo, the rioters, and the progressives want to use the police as their own personal army, but the police cannot act like that. The police can only enforce the laws that are listed on the books, and the only way they can enforce them is through the regulations the government has passed into law. And, unlike with Roman law, the police cannot escape being judged for an incident no matter how much they try to "wash their hands" of it.
Anonymous
f320e6d
?
No.281809
I think your experience with cops depends on the local leadership, how you interact with them, and if you are hitting the cop's personal peeve. I have always been very polite to cops, they have let me out of traffic stuff often. Only time a cop dragged my ass over the coals is when I was a college student in a college town, and the cop really fucking hated the students. The uni's bad reputation wasn't entirely undeserved.
Anonymous
a4f0cf4
?
No.281829
281836 281842
>>281780
>held to a list of rules and laws as well
Who judges them?
You can spend less than 10 minutes and find tons of enforcers and judges caught blatantly committing crimes without repercussion.
18 U.S.C. § 241
>Section 241 makes it unlawful for two or more persons to agree to injure, threaten, or intimidate a person in the United States in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured by the Constitution or laws of the Unites States or because of his or her having exercised such a right.
18 U.S.C. § 242
>This provision makes it a crime for someone acting under color of law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. It is not necessary that the offense be motivated by racial bias or by any other animus.
Just these two sections of federal law make every law enforcement officer in the US a criminal.
That's not even addressing using RICO law against the massive misuse of civil asset forfeiture, which was originally intended to be used when a court couldn't be easily accessed.

>>281743
>No, it's not.
>Muh shootings
Are a drop in the ocean compared to everything else the government does against it's citizens through various law enforcement agencies and legal structures.

>>281771
>You pretending this country is in that much better of a political situation is akin to me saying
Your government actually built a border with a clear no-mans-land. That's not far off from a moon mission in the US at this point.
>>281777
>if you want to live in a civilized society.
The US is an open air prison because of the police and the people who have grown to rely on a third party to protect themselves.
A society cannot be called civilized if it requires roving gangs to randomly enforce a will upon the people.
Anonymous
8ffd352
?
No.281836
281842 281888
>>281829
>the people who have grown to rely on a third party to protect themselves
Like every other country I can think of. You bring up having proper borders, a thing I am grateful for and endorse. But you do this to undermine the point about how any nationalist success associated with Hungary is largely overplayed by MSM in an effort to demonize right wing politics. Dude, this is still very much Europe: I still do not have the right to own a gun.
If you see US citizens as overly reliant on a third party for protection, then try to imagine how the people of a country where the very tools you could use to defend yourself are illegal would fare in that same department.
>randomly enforce a will upon the people
Yeah, except when "the people" are niggers setting fire to cars and the "enforced will" is that they stop and be punished for their destructive behavior. You keep dancing around this, but the fact of the matter is: there is a will that is right to enforce, and most criminals are not honest and upstanding members of society just minding their own business.
Anonymous
c13da0d
?
No.281842
281846 281888
>>281829
>Who judges them?
Depending on the case and how it's handled, it can be a judge or a jury.
>You can spend less than 10 minutes and find tons of enforcers and judges caught blatantly committing crimes without repercussion.
Then why didn't you post any recent examples? And, something that from prior to February.
>Just these two sections of federal law make every law enforcement officer in the US a criminal.
And, if you bothered to read a little bit further to 18 U.S. Code § 245: https://archive.vn/DfjJr
<(c) Nothing in this section shall be construed so as to deter any law enforcement officer from lawfully carrying out the duties of his office; and no law enforcement officer shall be considered to be in violation of this section for lawfully carrying out the duties of his office or lawfully enforcing ordinances and laws of the United States, the District of Columbia, any of the several States, or any political subdivision of a State. For purposes of the preceding sentence, the term “law enforcement officer” means any officer of the United States, the District of Columbia, a State, or political subdivision of a State, who is empowered by law to conduct investigations of, or make arrests because of, offenses against the United States, the District of Columbia, a State, or a political subdivision of a State.
>Are a drop in the ocean compared to everything else the government does against it's citizens through various law enforcement agencies and legal structures.
Are you seriously trying to readjust you complaint that because the cops don't shot enough people to justify your crusade against them, that means that you still have to tear them down because of OTHER parts of the government, who have nothing to do with law enforcement, and also have their own list of laws and regulations that they have to abide by, have corrupt individuals who try to the game the system? With half a dozen committees who do their own independent investigations into the matter and slam said corrupt individuals when they step outside their power (That is, if the citizens don't get them first).
>The US is an open air prison
Then why don't you LEAVE if living in this country is so terrible.
Unlike living in an actual prison, no one's going to stopping you.
>A society cannot be called civilized if it requires roving gangs to randomly enforce a will upon the people.
But, that's exactly what you're advocating for. Roving groups of " the people" who enforce justice as they see fit, with no laws and regulations, no oversight, and no jurisdiction.
What you desire and advocate for is anarchy.

>>281836
>Dude, this is still very much Europe: I still do not have the right to own a gun.
>If you see US citizens as overly reliant on a third party for protection, then try to imagine how the people of a country where the very tools you could use to defend yourself are illegal would fare in that same department.
Isn't there also the little caveat that the U.S. IS the only country where the citizens have an unrestricted right to own a weapon? Which means that shootings in other "established" countries tend to be a rarer occurrence because only hardened criminals or wealthy individuals (Or those that manage to jump through all those legal hoops in order to obtain a gun license) have access to those weapons, meanwhile everyone else has to make-do with make-shift and melee weapons for protection. And, that this fact also carries over to law enforcement tactics are conducted. To where European police would be strung up on the spot for shooting someone unless it was absolutely warranted (Which, even then, is extremely questionable) because practically no law-abiding citizens would own a gun, which is the "only" reason why you'd shoot someone. Meanwhile, here in the U.S., practically anyone can buy a gun at the age of 18, which means that officers have to operate under the assumption that everyone in the public may own a gun, so they are taught to be even more aggressive because their life is on the line every time they clock in. And, that's also leaving out the fact that an American officer even just pulling their gun out, not even firing it, for any reason can be enough to suspend or fire the guy.
Anonymous
8ffd352
?
No.281846
>>281842
>only hardened criminals or wealthy individuals ... have access to those weapons
So, what is you point, exactly? Only criminals and politicians having guns is not a good thing. And this doesn't just stop at guns, it's any weapon they deem worthy of banning, whether it shoots things or not.
>be citizen who respects all weapon laws and therefore doesn't own anything remotely useful
>get attacked by one of the roaming gypsy gangs who don't give a shit about laws
>you're fucked
Anyway, I only brought it up as an example to support how some burgerland posters pointing to Hungary as the desired nationalist paradise is absurd, I think it is a bit off topic by itself.
It is especially annoying when someone tries to use it to shoot down anything you have to say about any topic.
Anonymous
a4f0cf4
?
No.281888
281889 281903
>>281836
>Europe: I still do not have the right to own a gun.
Welcome to NY, NJ, CA, and most other metropolis states, and most other large cities in the US.

>>281842
>judge or a jury.
>Judge
Part of the same system.
>Jury
Picked for maximum loyalty.
>Then why didn't you post any recent examples?
What thread did you post in.
Why do I have to prove what you choose to ignore?

One of many sheriff's oath of office
>I will support the Constitution of the United States and of this State.
Every state forces sheriffs to say something similar.
Nearly every state has explicit right to bear arms sections of their constitution, and every state is required to honor the second amendment.
Sheriffs and their deputies enforce red flag laws and restricting the right to keep and bear arms.
They are clearly breaking both codes I've listed.

How many people have had assets siezed in the US for purely political reasons?

>OTHER parts of the government,
IRS is law enforcement. Tax code is law, they enforce it.
DEA is law enforcement. Drug prohibition is law, they enforce it.
BATF is law enforcement. Judges ruled that unconstitutional law is now law, and they enforce it.
The entire justice department and their subsidiaries are law enforcement. And the entire justice department is corrupt.

>What you desire and advocate for is anarchy.
No.
What I desire and advocate for is exactly what my ancestors fought to create.
What I desire and advocate for is explicitly stated in the period morale songs.

>the U.S. IS the only country where the citizens have an unrestricted right to own a weapon?
Have fun with a dead dog, wife, and child because someone wanted to make an example of you for sawing a shotgun.
Anonymous
8ffd352
?
No.281889
281901 281903
>>281888
>Have fun with a dead dog, wife, and child because someone wanted to make an example of you for sawing a shotgun.
I'm so confused. Are you anti-police now, or anti-2nd amendment? And who is going to enforce the gun bans if there are no police around?
Anonymous
a4f0cf4
?
No.281900
>(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security for records that the Secret Service claims to have destroyed related to a reported physical altercation between a Secret Service Agent and Joe Biden at a photo op in 2009 (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security (No. 1:20-cv-02457)).

>The lawsuit was filed after the Secret Service failed to respond to a July 14, 2020 administrative appeal challenging its claim that all files related to the 2009 altercation, “ha[d] been destroyed,” due to “retention standards.”

>On March 29, 2020, the Gateway Pundit republished a 2017 report alleging that an unidentified Secret Service agent was suspended for a week in 2009 for “shoving Biden after he cupped his girlfriend’s breast while the couple was taking a photo with him.” “The situation got so heated … that others had to step in to prevent the agent from hitting the then-Vice President,” according to the report.
https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-releases/destroyed-biden-records/

>The United States Secret Service (also USSS or Secret Service) is a federal law enforcement agency
Anonymous
a4f0cf4
?
No.281901
281903 281965
>>281889
How's the Interpol benefits?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruby_Ridge
Anonymous
c13da0d
?
No.281903
282252
City, LAPD Officials Mark 20th Anniversary Of North Hollywood Bank Shootout.mp4
>>281888
>Why do I have to prove
Because you're the one making the argument that the police "have to go", therefore you need to post examples of why they should go rather than post all the hypothetical (IOW, fictional) actions that the police can commit.
>Sheriffs and their deputies enforce red flag laws and restricting the right to keep and bear arms.
No, they don't: https://archive.vn/ZjI1W
https://archive.vn/Fjffz
https://archive.vn/TazsW
>IRS is law enforcement. Tax code is law, they enforce it.
The IRS is a subsidiary of the Treasury Department.
>The entire justice department and their subsidiaries are law enforcement. And the entire justice department is corrupt.
Except your previous argument went ranting on that because law enforcement doesn't kill enough civilians (literally copying and pasting my previous post), that means that you still have to tear them down because of OTHER parts of the government, who have nothing to do with law enforcement, and also have their own list of laws and regulations that they have to abide by, have corrupt individuals who try to the game the system? With half a dozen committees who do their own independent investigations into the matter and slam said corrupt individuals when they step outside their power (That is, if the citizens don't get them first).
>What I desire and advocate for is exactly what my ancestors fought to create.
Which is? Why do all these arguments boil down to someone advocating for some vague ideal with no concrete foundations, and then get mad when people point out how terrible the resulting outcome of those intended actions are?

>>281889
>Are you anti-police now, or anti-2nd amendment? And who is going to enforce the gun bans if there are no police around?
I honestly think he doesn't know, and just wants to abolish the police because they're "the man who's keeping him down".

>>281901
An incident that happened 28 years ago, where all the people involved were punished due to creating an event that NEVER should have happened in the first place?
<Since, we talking about incidents from yesteryear, how about discussing the North Hollywood shootout: https://infogalactic.com/info/North_Hollywood_shootout
Anonymous
a9aa2c0
?
No.281939
281950 282037
154084615.png
>Cop Murders Innocent Unarmed Dad in Front of Kids While Rescuing a Dog—Court Denies Cop Immunity
>Lawrence was unarmed and was not hitting or otherwise attempting to harm the officers. He was simply defending himself by pulling away. At one point, as shown in the video, as the officer was using the taser like a cattle prod on the innocent father, Lawrence grabbed his hand and tried to pull it away.
>This pulling away of the taser was used to justify Sgt. Woodruff in the murder of Lawrence as they claimed he was an armed threat. Woodruff never received so much as a slap on the wrist for killing Lawrence that day and has fought for immunity since.
>Now, however, a judge disagreed that Woodruff is entitled to immunity and has ruled that a lawsuit can move forward.
>For not having a driver’s license to rescue a dog, Robert Earl Lawrence would be killed by police. His children would watch with their own eyes as their father died in front of them at the hands of those they thought were there to protect them.
https://thefreethoughtproject.com/father-killed-in-front-of-children-rescuing-dog-immunity/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H1oEbPsDeyo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vcA9gfsxSgA
Anonymous
241977e
?
No.281950
282037
>>281939
>sovereign citizen
Stupid, just looking for problems.
Anonymous
0245173
?
No.281965
Spoilered
Spoilered
>>281901
>How's the Interpol benefits?
At this point I honestly can't tell whether you are trying to point out that employees of the Interpol are often corrupt, or implying that I might be a glownigger.
I sure as fuck hope it isn't the latter, as I am the one in this thread consistently demonstrating that I criticize the civnats and neocons from further right, and you are the one arguing for the side with the talking points that always end up suggesting that "we" should care about the "mistreatment" of those poor Antifa faggots by the big, bad police. I'm the one on all kinds of watch lists thanks merely to political opinions while having done nothing illegal, and you are the one the neolibs and marxists would deem politically correct, brave and beautiful. Here, have a redacted fuck you.
Anonymous
8363a7c
?
No.282025
ir46i7.png
84984165.jpg
15.png
>Police Union Caught Issuing ‘Get Out of Jail Free’ Cards to Family, Friends That Get Them Out of Tickets
>Known as blue privilege, there is an unwritten law among police officers: when they catch their fellow cop, or even their fellow cop’s family member or friend breaking the law, they are let go without consequence. Situations that have led to the murder of minorities and poor people end far differently when its police and their families caught committing the same crimes. A recent report out of Vice shows that this corruption runs so deep that police unions actually issue courtesy cards to friends and family of cops that allow them to get out of minor infractions.
>The cards are issued by the Police Benevolent Association, or other police unions and they are known as “courtesy cards.” They have the issuing officer’s name and signature on the back, along with a phone number for the ticketing or arresting officer to call to verify the relationship.
https://thefreethoughtproject.com/police-union-special-privilege-cards/
Anonymous
233098e
?
No.282037
282050
>>281939
>>281950
Basically. Fuck the officer for killing him, but Jesus Christ fuck "sovereign citizens" just the same.
Anonymous
12d5b5c
?
No.282050
282075
triggered.gif
>>282037
>but Jesus Christ fuck "sovereign citizens" just the same.
Anonymous
b8f44f0
?
No.282075
282076
>>282050
>sovereign citizens
You really need to fight only the battles you can win. No one can win that battle. If you can't win the battle, keep your powder dry for the battle you can win.
Anonymous
95565d9
?
No.282076
>>282075
I recognize you gotta point.
Anonymous
a88dd42
?
No.282238
5408.png
13yo-autistic-boy-660x330.jpg
>Mother Calls 911 for 13yo Autistic Boy’s Tantrum, Cops Show Up and Fill Him With Holes
https://thefreethoughtproject.com/mother-calls-911-for-13yo-autistic-boys-tantrum-cops-show-up-and-fill-him-with-holes/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WiHXSJ-JQ4A
Anonymous
a88dd42
?
No.282240
282279
nj.png
help-cant-breathe-660x330.jpg
>‘I Can’t Breathe. I’m Gonna Die, Help’: Cops Beat, Hold Handcuffed Man’s Face in the Dirt Until He Dies
>Delaware County, NJ — On April 3, Stephen Dolceamore, 29, of Delaware County, was in need of medical attention. He was reportedly in the midst of a mental health crisis when police officers responded to a call about him. Instead of “help” however, Dolceamore received a savage beating and would die as a result. Dolceamore would spend his last moments alive, face down in a dirt strip in a hotel parking lot, begging for help as cops squeezed the life from his body.
https://thefreethoughtproject.com/im-gonna-die-help-cant-breathe-cop-punch-suffocate-man-until-he-dies/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2wd6wc_aMI
Anonymous
5bb392a
?
No.282252
282283 282316 282317
>>281903
>hypothetical (IOW, fictional)
Reported cases.
https://invidious.snopyta.org/watch?v=rJd4Q4u5cqU
https://invidious.snopyta.org/watch?v=pVxArzm0N8A
https://invidious.snopyta.org/watch?v=hsre7I0UUJA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dlgJFYU91L8
https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/07/20/538279258/baltimore-police-caught-planting-drugs-in-body-cam-footage-public-defender-says

>No, they don't
Yes, they do.
https://www.jweekly.com/2020/08/18/attorney-of-alleged-neo-nazi-bowl-patrol-leader-contests-gun-seizure/
https://www.invidio.us/watch?v=PvBdTyuyQNM
And you don't seem to be able to answer the simple question:
>How many people have had assets siezed in the US for purely political reasons?
https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/19/us/kaleb-james-cole-guns-seized/index.html

>The IRS is a subsidiary of the Treasury Department.
Who enforces tax law. An enforcer of law is de-facto law enforcement, no matter the branch.
MPs are law enforcement. And what branch do they fall under? Executive.

>where all the people involved were punished
>Lon Horiuchi
>was charged with manslaughter for the death of Vicki Weaver at Ruby Ridge, but the charges were later dropped.
>dropped charges
>punished
https://twitter.com/rklueber28/status/1202722185690914817

>>281903
>I honestly think he doesn't know, and just wants to abolish the police because they're "the man who's keeping him down".
>can't see the forest or the trees
Has Israel influenced political, military, or financial leaders of the United States using nuclear armaments?
You and your Hungarian friend are absolutely radioactive.
Anonymous
53d2108
?
No.282279
282282 282283
>>282240
I really wouldn't have a problem with cops having some tranquilizers. Some of these nut jobs do need to be taken down until the medics can arrive. I'd opt for a syringe full of sedative over a beat down any day.
Anonymous
95565d9
?
No.282282
282426
>>282279
Look, it is undeniable that cops are psychos who enjoy to harm and kill. They would never give the same brutal treatment to another cop's family member, the rest of us is fair game for them and it won't stop till they are disarmed, disbanded, and punished for their crimes.
Those retards claiming that a society can't function without these cops are fooling themselves, the militia can take over in blink together with citizen appointed judges, but of course the establishment will oppose this by any means necessary. The taste of power is hard to let go.
Anonymous
c13da0d
?
No.282283
282284 282426
File (hide): 83114A7CA502F3F7A71D666BB2D25B1C-10706730.m4v (10.2 MB, Resolution:640x358 Length:00:02:10, Amped Up Guy Shot With 3 Tasers And Still Wont Go Down.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Amped Up Guy Shot With 3 Tasers And Still Wont Go Down.mp4
>>282279
I'm currently in the process of writing a response to this post: >>282252
But, I can answer your question in less than a minute.
>I really wouldn't have a problem with cops having some tranquilizers.
>I'd opt for a syringe full of sedative over a beat down any day.
Because you can only incapacitate someone within several seconds (Where anything can happen in that time ) if the drugs are directly administered into one of their major veins (And, remember, you're SHOOTING someone regardless; there's a reason why cops are trained to aim for the chest rather than one of the smaller body parts, now imagine the skill required to aim for one of THE FUCKING VEINS that you need to directly administer the drug into). If you miss that vein, then the drugs won't kick in until half an hour later (At best). Even then, you need to get the dosage right and have the appropriate tranquilizer formula that can be used due to the person's medical history, sex, age, weight, and height all playing a factor in the process. Administer too little, and the person is going to brush it off despite miraculously managing to hit him in one of the major pressure points. Administer too much (Or the person is allergic, or the person is already suffering from exposure to other drugs, or the person has a weak immune system), and you may KILL him. At that point, why not just use a gun?

Then, that's on top of the fact that cops already have the equivalent of tranquilizer darts without the chemistry: it's called a tazer. And, even THOSE are shown to be ineffective (At best) or can kill a person (At worst).
Anonymous
0ff5ef0
?
No.282284
282317 282426
>>282283
Let me resume your post in a nutshell, no matter how insignificant the issue is, cops are allowed to escalate til murder by the politicians and the judiciary, it is to comply or get murdered. That is unacceptable and basis for fair and natural retaliation.
Thousands of people are being murdered for this out of control gang for not compliance or, because the government thug feels so.
And if these killers can't do their job because restrictions on their use of violence, the door is right there and better they quit for everybody' sake.
Anonymous
c13da0d
?
No.282316
282317 282355 282434
File (hide): 58B6786E373D9BD0F554512C1EE5705F-48958232.m4v (46.7 MB, Resolution:1280x720 Length:00:04:33, How Wolves Change Rivers.mp4) [play once] [loop]
How Wolves Change Rivers.mp4
>>282252
Thank you for providing some actual sources so that we can have a discussion.
>https://invidious.snopyta.org/watch?v=rJd4Q4u5cqU
I asked for recent examples, 2011 was nine years ago. That's not to say that civil asset forfeiture (An act that is anything, BUT "civil") IS NOT something that people should quit worrying about: https://archive.vn/pWBSj
However, in the years since the video was uploaded, the people committing it are being imprisoned: https://archive.vn/jVPWj
States are putting in laws that prevent the act: https://archive.vn/wv1Qm
https://archive.vn/d2QIe
Similar measures are going through congress: https://archive.vn/CcqoB
And, you have both the state courts: https://archive.vn/uqHOY
And, the federal courts declaring the entire practice unlawful: https://archive.vn/8lQt9
That being said, there's also the fact that people should be going after those who are creating these problems and/or abusing their power in the first place: https://archive.vn/yT4V6
More laws, or a complete destruction of the law, will not solve anything is it is ignoring the root of the problem: that it's a position manned by people; and people are (By default) selfish, corruptible, and emotional. As soon as you find a way to best minimize the effects of those qualities, then things will start to improve.
>https://invidious.snopyta.org/watch?v=pVxArzm0N8A
Why can I NOT find any mention of this incident (Or it's after-effects) that happened back in 2015: https://archive.vn/JC4zx
There's mentions of a lawsuit that was happening, but the ONLY source I can find even talking about the incident (Both before and after July 2017) is just this one article posted in August that is a repost of another article from July 2017: https://archive.vn/5wXN6
The only other relevant info this is the "Clyde-Hirsch-Sowers-RESPECT Act", that passed the House, but is still waiting in the Senate: https://archive.vn/CkruG
And, that's on top of the fact that it appears the actual story is missing too much info on what exactly took place, much more who exactly was in the wrong: https://archive.vn/q1pDM
>https://invidious.snopyta.org/watch?v=hsre7I0UUJA
And, less than two months later: https://archive.vn/Q4eVF
Also, one thing that's really perplexing me, why didn't they direct deposit the cash through a shared branch bank? It saves both the time and the hassle. That's not discounting that the DEA was in the wrong, but WHY?!
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dlgJFYU91L8
Again, not recent. Also, that wasn't the actions of the cops, that was the informant. And, the guy was sent to prison as a result of it: https://archive.vn/BDjE0
With the shop owner later filing a lawsuit about the entire incident (And, once again, that's the latest update I can find): https://archive.vn/6v9mf
To be quite honest, informants are more trouble than their worth: https://archive.vn/5g2Qp
And, despite the fact that even the cops know they're unreliable: https://archive.vn/2Rehz
They're still used in over 90% of cases (As of seven years ago) for some reason: https://archive.vn/pmzEQ
In fact, what's really sad is that they are completely aware that it's a problem, but won't ever address it because no one is going to hold their feet to the fire over it (Not the public, nor their supervisors): https://archive.vn/59TlH
I doubt Henry Howe's lawsuit will make much change, but it's a start: https://archive.vn/CinXn
>https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/07/20/538279258/baltimore-police-caught-planting-drugs-in-body-cam-footage-public-defender-says
<The officer has been suspended and two of his colleagues are on administrative duty, Baltimore Police Commissioner Kevin Davis said, as the agency's internal affairs unit looks at the case.
>https://www.jweekly.com/2020/08/18/attorney-of-alleged-neo-nazi-bowl-patrol-leader-contests-gun-seizure/
>https://www.invidio.us/watch?v=PvBdTyuyQNM
>https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/19/us/kaleb-james-cole-guns-seized/index.html
So, I bring up a few sources showing how several sheriffs across several cities refuse to enforce red-flag laws, and three isolated incidents discredit all of that?
>>How many people have had assets siezed in the US for purely political reasons?
Define "political".
I'm not joking because you have people who keep bitching about this subject, such as how (A few months ago) Pantifa supports were screeching about how they were declared a domestic terrorist organization: https://archive.vn/Oopgp
And responded by saying that the government cannot do that: https://archive.vn/7eguq
Or stating that, to make things "fair", they also need to investigate white supremacists, Far-Right extremists, and Right-Wing militias: https://archive.vn/9AfUh
>Who enforces tax law. An enforcer of law is de-facto law enforcement, no matter the branch.
That isn't how that works. It's like declaring that the Supreme Court is "law enforcement" because they enforce the laws of the constitution upon the rest of the federal government.
>MPs are law enforcement. And what branch do they fall under? Executive.
The Treasury Department is part of the Executive Branch, smartass, however that does not mean they're law enforcement. Actual law enforcement falls under the jurisdiction of the Department of Justice, another division under the Executive Branch of the government. The MPs serve as nothing more than security for the U.S. Army (And, only the U.S. Army), which is part of the Department of Defense, again, another division under the Executive Branch of the government.
Anonymous
c13da0d
?
No.282317
282334
File (hide): 9EBF6BD33294A08FC056857C4642ABC7-800751.webm (782.0 KB, Resolution:640x352 Length:00:00:10, 1445986776675.webm) [play once] [loop]
1445986776675.webm
>>282316
>>282252
The Exectutive Branch has 15 different departments (All with their own division, subdivision, etc.). Each one has their own jurisdiction and responsbilities that they are confined to and cannot violate. Partnerships may happen, however even those are held to guidelines on what they each can and cannot do. Trying to declare that "All of it is the same" shows that you don't know the most basic shit about how the government actually works.
>https://twitter.com/rklueber28/status/1202722185690914817
Why are you linking a Twatter post detailing that a couple of bank robbers used their hostages as shields during a shootout?
>Has Israel influenced political, military, or financial leaders of the United States using nuclear armaments?
What? Can you rewrite that into an English sentence that I can actually understand?
>You and your Hungarian friend are absolutely radioactive.
Why, because we're not anarchists who want to destroy every form government?

>>282284
>Why don't the cops use "less than lethal methods" to subdue potential criminals?
<Because those "less than lethal methods" are either completely ineffective or just as deadly.
>DON'T YOU SEE, THE COPS ARE GOING TO KEEP KILLING PEOPLE BECAUSE THEY ARE THE ONLY ONES WHO CAN GET AWAY WITH IT!!!
Anonymous
19d4230
?
No.282334
282434
It all boils down to human interactions and basic personality profiles.
More importantly the foundational rules of the universe. It's just physics at play. Any and all human social systems and contacts have to be enforced by someone. If it's your own moral guide, the angery mob, the neighborly sheriff, or the tired cop, a power hunger police, or a firearm backing it up.
Any person can do whatever they are capable of doing. It doesn't mean they should, or that others won't act upon that action.
That includes law enforcement too. They are people as well. The lawyer, the judge, the senator, the representative, the CEO, the CFO, the branch manager, the janitor, the activist, (((those fuckers))), the everyday person, or even a child they have that potential and are not limited. That has to always be considered.

So should the police be that brutal? Sometimes that's the only heat of the moment choice visible. Hindsight is 20 20, but some instances it's multiple failures of simple communication.
Just like all things, shit happens. Right now ever single instance of every single malpractice can be recorded. So even if total crimes and malpractice is down, the personalized footage is up.
That means there is still room for improvement.

So how the fuck does society stop brutality? No criminals means no need to enforce it. Long impossible shot.
So what are the tools at our disposal.
The goal is threat nullification, and physical submission (for transport).
There is guns to cease their fuckery. It's a permanent solution.
Any kind of pain inflictors targets the mind to make it give up. Except people can resist that.
Electro impulses have be just right to work properly.
Drugs change people's minds so the above might not work anyway.
Tranquilizers are even more fiddly, and can fuck up.
Martial Arts takes fucking years to not be a faggot.
Choke holds would work if its fucking done right, but nooo too much time and training to do that. Not to mention they have to be right next to the person to do it. Then they have to do it 'safely'. If they stop hollering make sure they don't suffocate

Now there is the biggest problems. Good, Right, and Proper Law enforcement is hard. People on average are extremely lazy. They won't, and at times can't, do everything perfectly. Not only that half the population are stupid. Then there is the fact the tools available aren't good enough.
>>281771
>The police is a tool. A tool is meant to be wielded and used. What it is used for depends on who wields it. If your government is not on your side, the police won't be either. Not in any official manner, at least. If a violent asshole uses a stolen hammer to punch you in the face, your reaction shouldn't be speaking out against the very concept of hammers, but against the asshole in question. The hammer is still just a hammer. If you manage to ban hammers on the basis of them having the potential of being stolen and used to punch you in the face, good luck building anything more complex than mud huts in the future.
No, the right course of action is getting your hammer back.

Exactly.
>>281727
Everything said here is what I agree with.
Multiple divisions to keep the peace, and to ensure people have their liberties and the associated responsibilities.

During these times one has to keep a keen head.
>>282317
>Has Israel influenced political, military, or financial leaders of the United States using nuclear armaments?
What? Can you rewrite that into an English sentence that I can actually understand?

External forces do effect other countries and the US is no exception despite attempts otherwise. Dual citizen ship in the highest levels of government are a majority.
Loyalty, and severing the interests of the US and its people are not their main factor.
>You and your Hungarian friend are absolutely radioactive.
Why,

Laws don't stop bad people from doing bad things, and neither do guidelines. A silly sign saying it's a gun free zone doesn't strip a criminal from one. People have to do it.
If they aren't caught, no one knows. If they have the news, internet, and media on their side nobody can know. If they hold the monopoly of force no one can ensure they actually follow the rules an escalation of force that distabilizes more of society than its worth. Such as stopping of transport, or water, or food, or electricity, or waste, or any of the hundreds of things. It will cost so much more.
It is needed that people have the arms as well, despite many people being idiots, the seperation of forces has worked, but needs to be further encouraged.
The soft social rules and laws are there, they don't stop people, they are the potential cost.
If the laws are patched up that doesn't mean they have to enforce it.
If they violate the principals of the country, they shouldn't enforce it.
If someone speaks out against that, they are fired, and a yes man can enter.
There has to be trust, and they have to be truthful, and absolutely clear. That's dangerous, because freedom always is.
I am not an anarchist I am listing the potentials, and the consequences. People lie, and cheat, and do horrible things. Everyone CAN do ANYTHING. Keep that in mind, just adjusting the law doesn't mean things get better.
It OUGHT to, but that didn't mean it will. Call me cynical, but that's how I see it.
Just one factor could potentially make a huge difference, or it could be practically useless.
Anonymous
4b320a0
?
No.282355
>>282316
>wolves video
Agreed, wolves are needed, but our wolves, not (((theirs))).
Anonymous
460543c
?
No.282426
282433 282434 282437
>>282282
>the militia can take over in blink together with citizen appointed judges
Eh, my neighbors suck, I'd rather roll the dice with a random cop.

>Look, it is undeniable that cops are psychos who enjoy to harm and kill.
If that were true, they wouldn't last long. Most cops don't get the opportunity to kill someone over their whole career. If you want to kill, join the army, you will be given chances to kill.

You make it sound like cops have a few notches on their belt each. They don't. You also sound like a nigger.

>>282283
>If you miss that vein, then the drugs won't kick in until half an hour later
Hmm, how do they take down animals then? Shoot from a distance and wait it out?

> it's called a tazer. And, even THOSE are shown to be ineffective (At best) or can kill a person (At worst).
Yeah, plenty of videos of a tazer just making someone mad.

>>282284
>Thousands of people are being murdered for this out of control gang for not compliance
Yep, someone has to do it. Always be polite to your local policeman. Bring them some donuts, it might come in handy.
Anonymous
b3f27b3
?
No.282433
282484
>>282426
>You make it sound like cops have a few notches on their belt each. They don't.
Do you know many police forces prefer ex-military elements?>>282426
>Always be polite to your local policeman. Bring them some donuts, it might come in handy.
I'm speechless, and you are the problem.
Police is meant to serve us, we don't bow to them, we don't kiss their asses; and the supreme truth is that they are below us. Get that in your head.
Anonymous
a613196
?
No.282434
282437 282484
>>282316
Has Israel influenced political, military, or financial leaders of the United States using nuclear armaments?
Answer the question.

Was it fun murdering that 100% innocent man in DC while he was sleeping next to his pregnant wife?
Was it fun shooting her?
Was the fast and furious gun walking operation fun?
Was it fun stealing money and firearms from small business owners, while committing fraud and identify theft?
Do you realize you're breaking federal law by hitting the reply button as a federal employee? Or did you get a special waiver? I hope you realize that if you received a waiver, you're only supporting my point.

This faggot understands: >>282334
Any form of law enforcement in the civilized world is a paramilitary organization who represents the occupying force.
They are not my law, they are not my people, they do not represent me or my people.

ANTIFA is powerless without the police
>punch that nazi!
>oh no he shot me!
>CALL THE POLICE!
Who captured the Wisconsin guy? Who allowed him to be charged with murder?

Liberals are powerless without the police
>BAN THOSE GUNS!
>Who is going to enforce it?
Mexico is a look at America's future if law enforcement isn't brought to heel.
It's illegal to own a firearm outside of special areas, illegal to own ammunition, and yet the criminals have everything, the police do nothing to fix the problem, and specifically target anyone who challenges their ability to combat violence.

>>282426
>Hmm, how do they take down animals then? Shoot from a distance and wait it out?
10-100x dosage, then wait for it to drop and rush in with reversal drugs. Police can't even tell when they've suffocated someone, how do you expect them to do that?
That won't work on drug resistant subjects.
Tazers are safer and they're still unsafe.
Wrestling and beatings are safer than Tazers, but jew lawyers whine, and the pitbull police can't seem to control themselves to do it correctly.
>Yep, someone has to do it. Always be polite to your local policeman. Bring them some donuts, it might come in handy.
You have to do it.
If someone fucks with you, don't wait for someone else to help you, do it yourself.
>but that's illegal
Because police.
Every early senator in the US carried either two pistols or a pistol and dagger. Compare and contrast the violent crime rates during that time and now.

The glowniggers in this thread can't seem to accept that they're largely unnecessary in daily situations, and seem to be completely absent in times when they're absolutely necessary.
Anonymous
c13da0d
?
No.282437
282443 282484
Who has the nukes.png
Violence-Stylized-2.png
>>282426
>Hmm, how do they take down animals then? Shoot from a distance and wait it out?
Pulling up some news articles: https://archive.vn/s03id
<Unlike in television and movie portrayals, real tranquilizers take time to take effect, and the impact of a dart can make an animal aggressive or cause it to run.
<Sedation "doesn't happen immediately," said Leigh Henry, a senior policy officer with the World Wildlife Fund (WWF).
<In fact, a vet from a local zoo shot one of the tigers with a tranquilizer dart. But the animal started to run off, forcing officers to shoot and kill it.

https://archive.vn/ZEhH4
<Attempting to fatally shoot an animal that's mauling a human comes with the risk of accidentally shooting the person you're trying to save. But tranquilizers can take as long as 10 minutes to kick in, letting potentially life-saving minutes tick by while the animal is still alert enough to pose a threat.
<Palm Beach Zoo chose to tranquilize the tiger, and Konwiser, 38, was airlifted in critical condition to a hospital, where she later died of her injuries.
<Since then, the zoo has come under fire for its choice to "tranq," which West Palm Beach police say prevented paramedics from immediately entering the zoo enclosure where Konwiser was mauled. Neither police nor the zoo have said how long emergency personnel had to wait, citing the ongoing investigation.

https://archive.vn/5BwHS
<It took eight shotgun blasts by sheriff's deputies to kill a lion that got loose at a North Carolina wildlife center and killed a 22-year-old intern, according to a sheriff's report obtained Wednesday by ABC News.
<Caswell County Sheriff's deputies resorted to deadly force on Sunday to take down the 14-year-old lion at the Conservators Center in Burlington after a worker at the facility shot the animal three times with tranquilizer darts that apparently had no effect, according to the report.


>>282434
>Has Israel influenced political, military, or financial leaders of the United States using nuclear armaments?
You mean just like Russia, France, China, and the U.K.: https://archive.vn/jH23p
>Was...
Why don't you provide sources to back up whatever the fuck it is that you're talking about?
>ANTIFA is powerless without the police
<Meanwhile ALL the cities that are being burned to the ground don't have the law enforcement taking ANY action towards the riots taking place
>Who captured the Wisconsin guy?
The Kenosha Kid? He turned himself in.
>Liberals are powerless without the police
<Meanwhile [Second verse, same as the first], all of which are Liberal-dominated regions
>Every early senator in the US carried either two pistols or a pistol and dagger. Compare and contrast the violent crime rates during that time and now.
Second pic source: https://archive.vn/k74ob
Anonymous
a613196
?
No.282443
😂.jpg
File (hide): D49431D992F238656AFC2A9E844C2E51-8221194.webm (7.8 MB, Resolution:1280x720 Length:00:01:45, 20200825___streamable.com_NA.webm) [play once] [loop]
20200825___streamable.com_NA.webm
>>282437
>Has Israel influenced political, military, or financial leaders of the United States using nuclear armaments?
You have two choices to answer this question.
1. Yes. Israel influences political, military, and financial leaders of the United States using nuclear armaments.
2. No. Israel does not influence political, military, and financial leaders of the United States using nuclear armaments.
ANSWER THE QUESTION GLOWNIGGER.

>muh sources
>plays dumb about fast and furious
>plays dumb about assassinated man in this very thread
ANSWER THE QUESTION GLOWNIGGER.

>The Kenosha Kid? He turned himself in.
>Wisconsin authorities issued an arrest warrant charging Kyle Rittenhouse with first-degree intentional homicide, Antioch Police said. He is in the custody of the Lake County Judicial System pending an extradition hearing to transfer him from Illinois to Wisconsin. Antioch is located about 15 to 20 miles from Kenosha, just across the state border.
>Turned himself in
Try harder.
ANSWER THE QUESTION GLOWNIGGER.

>muh pink text liberal cities
webm related
MFW a glownigger gives two examples of law enforcement supporting criminals through inaction, while arresting those maintaining the peace or protesting the actions of niggerfaggots.
MFW fedniggers that conducted snatch and grabs siezed phones without obtaining warrants.
MFW fedniggers charged a native born US citizen for "illegally entering the country".
MFW fedniggers won't be properly punished, further proving my points.
MFW fence sitting responsible conservatives are quickly realizing that law enforcement is being used almost exclusively against them.

>muh statistics
Epstein didn't kill himself.
Chicago gun laws and violence.
D.C. gun bans and violence.
Baltimore gun laws and violence.
New York City gun laws and violence.
You're unnecessary outside of very specific situations Mr. Glownigger.
By the way, did you answer the question yet?

Here's a set of questions for USA anons:
Has any sheriff deputized his entire county so that all residents may purchase post-ban fully-auto firearms as their second amendment right guarantees?
Has any police department in magazine ban state imported large capacity magazines to sell to residents without using it as a honeypot?

I know of one place in the US which passed legislation requiring every home owner to own a gun and ammunition.

Now for more rhetorical questions.
If imprisonment is meant to contain, then why are the imprisoned set free?
If imprisonment is meant to reform, then why don't post-imprisoned have the same set of rights?
If the post-imprisoned cannot exercise their rights, then why are they taxed as if they can?
If they have to be monitored once released, then why release them?
If the post-imprisoned cannot peacefully remove themselves from society without breaking laws, how can you expect them to reform?
Why should I be treated like a criminal when law enforcement fails at either containing or reforming someone they label a malcontent?
Anonymous
6e0d3bf
?
No.282484
282485
>>282434
>You have to do it.
>If someone fucks with you, don't wait for someone else to help you, do it yourself.
Well, sure, but that assumes you will never come in contact with the local police otherwise. It's cheap insurance to butter them up and act friendly. You get the benefit of the doubt at the very least. Some people locally have police benevolent association stickers on their car. Personally, that's too transparently kissing ass to me. Just seems disingenuous, but if it comes up in conversation that you know where the station is, and they ask why...

>>282437
Ok ok, I lose, no tranqs. Just shoot the mentally ill. It's really too bad the asylums were closed, they may have had problems but they were really serving a need.

>>282433
>Police is meant to serve us, we don't bow to them, we don't kiss their asses; and the supreme truth is that they are below us. Get that in your head.
Well, that's not very friendly anon. You can't go in there acting like they owe you a favor, you are just being friendly. But hey, friends help friends out. It's the magic of frenship.

The law puts them in power over you, like it or not. Disobey a direct police order and you are getting fucked up or dead. It's just the way it is.
Anonymous
c13da0d
?
No.282485
>>282484
>It's really too bad the asylums were closed, they may have had problems but they were really serving a need.
Blame the politicians who cannot budget if their lives depended on it: https://archive.vn/TXu6n
The press and media for declaring that all mental asylums are cruel and inhumane because of a couple horror stories (Boy, doesn't that sound familiar): https://archive.vn/6eUKC
And, the tranny and faggot community for bitching about how people see their fetish-turned-lifestyle as a mental illness: https://archive.vn/7IMDi
Anonymous
88545d2
?
No.282725
282728
>Milwaukee Trump Supporter Arrested for Brandishing a Gun at Black Lives Matter Mob That Was Surrounding His Home
>A Milwaukee man has reportedly been arrested after pulling a gun on a mob of Black Lives Matter supporters who were surrounding his home for several hours.

https://twitter.com/mrandyngo/status/1306072075564531713?s=21
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/09/breaking-milwaukee-trump-supporter-arrested-brandishing-gun-black-lives-matter-mob-surrounding-home-video/
Anonymous
88545d2
?
No.282726
282728 282757
Police watch man get assaulted by mob, then arrest him when he defends himself.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=6AIzhAQLG1A
Anonymous
f26b3c7
?
No.282728
282757
>>282725
>>282726
Imagine what will happen by new year's eve, conservatives will be caught between the cross fire of commies and police. Until they don't wake up and recognize that police is taking marching orders from the same fuckers organizing the riots, they'll be paralyzed and crushed. After all, most police and those in key positions in the judiciary are luciferians freemasons and have conflicted loyalties and moral standards to normal people.
Anonymous
d1fcc91
?
No.282757
282777
>>282726
I think they did that to remove him from the situation. Even though he pulled a gun, they were going to lob rocks from the back, and he would have had to start shooting. He was released with no charges.

>>282728
>Imagine what will happen by new year's eve,
Too long, imagine what will happen by election day.
Anonymous
7067b1a
?
No.282777
282778 282851 282864
>>282757
>Too long, imagine what will happen by election day.

>Trump and the GOP win by a landslide
>Everyone left of Hitler contests the election
>Outright anarchy begins in Democratic controlled districts as they announce disapproval and/or session
>Majority of police force fail to report in on the next day
>Pocket militias start setting up comps so that they can survive
>Trump sends in the National Guard
>Everything resolved within the week by arresting everyone, and filing charges against those who resist
>The Democratic party fractures as half of it's members and leaders are in jail
>Non-anarchists are released over the next couple months for being innocent
That's as far ahead as I can think.
Anonymous
e3c49e9
?
No.282778
>>282777
Nice trips.
Anonymous
6393b08
?
No.282851
DonaldDuckBoner.gif
>>282777 (checked)
pic related.

But really, fixed that for you:
>Trump and the GOP win by a landslide
>Everyone left of Hitler contests the election
>Anons have forgotten what happened in 2018.
>Blue cities in purple states start "finding" boxes of "uncounted ballots". Woops.
>Outright anarchy begins in Democratic controlled districts for fun
>ZOG police force arrest anyone defending themselves
>Whites say nothing, niggers say "he was a good boi, dindu nuffin"
>More boxes of "uncounted ballots' discovered.
>Biden wins
>The right do nothing
>Biden dies
>Dawn of Harris / Pelosi administration
>Pedosex legalized
>Mandatory estrogen injections for white men every Tuesday.
Anonymous
0e4ca16
?
No.282864
Princess Luna - Check'em.jpg
>>282777
Checked.
Anonymous
e018161
?
No.282881
1.png
2.png
3.png
4.png
>Three Interactive Tools for Understanding Police Surveillance
>As law enforcement and government surveillance technology continues to become more and more advanced, it has also become harder for everyday people to avoid. Law enforcement agencies all over the United States are using body-worn cameras, automated license plate readers, drones, and much more—all of which threat people's right to privacy. But it's often difficult for people to even become aware of what technology is being used where they live.
>The Electronic Frontier Foundation has three interactive tools that help you learn about the new technologies being deployed around the United States and how they impact you: the Atlas of Surveillance, Spot the Surveillance, and Who Has Your Face?
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2020/09/three-interactive-tools-understanding-police-surveillance
Anonymous
8901b78
?
No.282891
282896
181826.png
87798552.png
sleeping-woman-killed-1050x525.jpg
Dog killers.
>Cop Arrested After Shooting at a ‘Puppy’, Killing Innocent Sleeping Woman Instead
>Arlington, TX — As readers of the Free Thought Project know, police killing or attempting to kill dogs is an all too common occurrence — happening so often that it is caught on video much of the time. Also, as the following tragic case our of Arlington, TX illustrates, all too often, police will attempt to kill a dog — miss the dog — and shoot and kill an innocent person instead.
>A Texas grand jury indicted a police officer this week after he was seen on video trying to kill a dog and killing an innocent woman instead.
>Arlington police officer Ravi Singh was charged on Wednesday with criminally negligent homicide for killing Maggie Brooks, 30, the daughter of an Arlington fire captain.
https://thefreethoughtproject.com/officer-indicted-killing-woman-shooting-at-puppy/
Anonymous
347418f
?
No.282892
cvn.png
fh5.jpg
dctal.jpg
>Florida: Cop Fired For Cowering In Fear As Gunman Slaughtered Children Get Rehired, With Full Back Pay
>Parkland, FL — A sheriff’s deputy who was fired after the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting for cowering by his car while Nicolas Cruz slaughtered children inside, is back on the job — and likely receiving six figures of back pay.
>According to the Sun Sentinel, an arbitrator ruled this week that Broward Sheriff Gregory Tony acted 13 days too late when he fired deputy Josh Stambaugh last year for his conduct during the February 2018 massacre at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School.
>State law says discipline against law enforcement officers must occur within 180 days of an investigation’s completion but apparently that didn’t happen. It is unknown exactly how much Stambaugh will receive in back pay, but he earned more than $150,000 in 2018, including overtime.
https://sonsoflibertymedia.com/florida-cop-fired-for-cowering-in-fear-as-gunman-slaughtered-children-get-rehired-with-full-back-pay/
Any doubts about what's going on here?
Anonymous
8c68e5b
?
No.282896
>>282891
What a dipshit. You would have to be a master marksman to make that shot in that state of panic. A medium size dog, running at you, while you are running backwards, then you squeeze off three fucking shots? He's a pussy, if he was really worried about the dog, he could have calmly lined up the sights and waited for the dog to get closer. Unless you are a kid, the dog isn't going to be able to kill you. One shot would have done it, and if it didn't, you need to line the sights up again, and squeeze off another.

These cops need more range time. Spray and pray just doesn't work, especially on a dog.

They also need to learn how to scare a dog. Put your hands up and out so you occupy a lot of space, make a loud sound, and 9/10 dogs will fuck right off after that. Three quick steps forward towards the dog will take care of the last 1/10 unless the dog is pro trained to attack, and few dogs are.
Anonymous
2f864ba
?
No.283299
19849815.png
slc-body-cam-autism-660x330.jpg
>Newly Released Video Shows Cop Shoot 13yo Unarmed Autistic Boy 12 Times as He Runs Away
>Salt Lake City, UT — As TFTP reported the Salt Lake City Police Department apparently thinks unarmed little autistic boys are considered a threat and fair game to fill with holes. The country was shocked earlier this month when learning that police shot a 13-year-old autistic boy after his mother called for help. Now, body camera footage has been released which is even more shocking.
>Linden Cameron, a 13-year-old little boy with autism was having a bad day earlier this month after his mother returned to work for the first time in a year. Cameron suffers from severe separation anxiety and when his mother left, he went into a crisis.
>Linden’s mother, Golda Barton said she called police that evening and requested a crisis intervention team (CIT). She told them her son was not armed and was in the midst of a mental breakdown and she needed help to get him to the hospital.
>Police entered her home and moments later, her child ran away. Barton says she heard, “get down on the ground” and several gunshots rang out. Police would later explain, as the body camera footage shows, that Cameron ran from them.
>“He’s a small child. Why didn’t you just tackle him? He’s a baby. He has mental issues,” his mother said. We agree. When police open fire on a small child in a mental health crisis, it is high time we reexamine the role of law enforcement in America. This has gotten way out of hand.
https://thefreethoughtproject.com/police-shoot-autistic-boy-12-times/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GjFBX6OPVBE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKUnbgcDGQo