This question is addressed to those of you who favor Fascism, National Socialism, or other idealogies which assert that the state should play a major role in society and the economy. How would you go about preventing such a government from becoming corrupt and bureaucratic? And, if such a government did become corrupt or bureaucratic, what could be done to reverse this, outside of a full-on violent revolution? I'm no expert on fascism or National Socialism, not having read much on these systems aside from a little bit of Mosley's 100 questions, mostly in search of an answer to this same question.
/mlpol/ - My Little Politics
Archived thread
File (): 440C7D68CC1D08E755BD5217753E3EC7-3078600.gif (2.9 MB, 480x270, aggressive dooting.gif)
File (): 0FFAE5FFDEA6D251353F94E9B9BF9623-1088531.png (1.0 MB, 1000x1500, 1505663057212-0.png)
>>162273
We would replace the top leadership every 10 years like China. We would also have a bounty for reporting fraud, waste, and abuse, including qui tam suits.
We would replace the top leadership every 10 years like China. We would also have a bounty for reporting fraud, waste, and abuse, including qui tam suits.
They need to be tested for mental disorders too. No psychopaths.
>>162273
the USA had a system of checks and ballences. But then we had to make "amendments" which destroyed everything the constitution was. Language over time also changed and is why there is such debate now as to "what do they mean freedom of speech applies to everyone and buisnesses aren't exempt?"
There needs to be a clause that makes it where the original doctrine can never be changed nor amended to remove. When it says you need land, and be a man, and blacks are slaves, then that is the way it will remain, oh and currency backed by silver and gold. Because fuck the IOU Jew.
the USA had a system of checks and ballences. But then we had to make "amendments" which destroyed everything the constitution was. Language over time also changed and is why there is such debate now as to "what do they mean freedom of speech applies to everyone and buisnesses aren't exempt?"
There needs to be a clause that makes it where the original doctrine can never be changed nor amended to remove. When it says you need land, and be a man, and blacks are slaves, then that is the way it will remain, oh and currency backed by silver and gold. Because fuck the IOU Jew.
>>162436
We need to rewrite the constitution in modern lingo, example:
"A well regulated millitia, being nessesary to the security of a free state; the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed"
Becomes
"A well equipt populous is nessesary to the security of a free state, therefore the right of the people to keep and bear any weapons shall not be infringed."
We need to rewrite the constitution in modern lingo, example:
"A well regulated millitia, being nessesary to the security of a free state; the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed"
Becomes
"A well equipt populous is nessesary to the security of a free state, therefore the right of the people to keep and bear any weapons shall not be infringed."
File (): 1B0C6621BBAFAFB0FECEA8CCC88301AF-243508.png (237.8 KB, 1024x841, 1499220945498-2.png)
>>162447
Yes. You could own gigantic cannons and warships back when they were the superweapons of the world, you can own a McNuke.
Yes. You could own gigantic cannons and warships back when they were the superweapons of the world, you can own a McNuke.
>>162273
The leadership must be genetically engineered to perfection, their psyche scrubbed of facets that lead to corruption, they must be viewed and view themselves as both less and more than people, the physical manifestation of a nation. A simpler method would be to have a cold, logical AI do the job since they'd be much less prone to the bullshit often found within human leadership. No normal human could safely wield the kind of power needed to make a state centric system work indefinitely.
The main issue with reversing corruption in these kinds of systems is that they're implicitly designed to prevent subversion by mob rule and freedom of political association. Bloody revolution really is the only way of reversing a corrupt authoritarian government without adding checks and balances to the system which themselves can be abused by corrupt officials.
The leadership must be genetically engineered to perfection, their psyche scrubbed of facets that lead to corruption, they must be viewed and view themselves as both less and more than people, the physical manifestation of a nation. A simpler method would be to have a cold, logical AI do the job since they'd be much less prone to the bullshit often found within human leadership. No normal human could safely wield the kind of power needed to make a state centric system work indefinitely.
The main issue with reversing corruption in these kinds of systems is that they're implicitly designed to prevent subversion by mob rule and freedom of political association. Bloody revolution really is the only way of reversing a corrupt authoritarian government without adding checks and balances to the system which themselves can be abused by corrupt officials.
>>162276
China has huge corruption issues. I'm not against a state by any means, but that doesn't help your case.
>>162436
>we had to make "amendments" which destroyed everything the constitution was
I don't think that is a good idea. The problem isn't the amendment system. If all law was set in stone how could law be adapted to changing concepts. No the problem is society. What society accepts as right will always change. No matter how rigid the laws are if people want them changed they'll change them.
China has huge corruption issues. I'm not against a state by any means, but that doesn't help your case.
>>162436
>we had to make "amendments" which destroyed everything the constitution was
I don't think that is a good idea. The problem isn't the amendment system. If all law was set in stone how could law be adapted to changing concepts. No the problem is society. What society accepts as right will always change. No matter how rigid the laws are if people want them changed they'll change them.
9 replies | 3 files | 1 UUIDs | Archived