>>150041This. If you're going to study any conflict to get a field, it would be the Yugoslavian Civil War. It will be somewhat similar, except more fragmented, more bloodshed, and more corny propaganda videos.
How you'll perform won't be based on how strong you are, how fast you are, or what special moves you know but rather how much you can carry, how far you can carry it, and how well you can hide yourself.
If you're in a city you're basically dead for a number of reasons: concentrations of minorities and libtards, hazards, and supply line vulnerabilities. Once food gets cut off they'll all turn on each other, probably even literally eat each other. Suburbs are iffy but you can survive if your neighborhood is trustworthy and if you have a means of supply. Don't doubt they'll turn on you if they see you better fed than they are.
The military is a wild card but isn't as important as statists think it is. Depending on what side command takes entire divisions could mutiny. Although highly skilled and trained operatives are welcome, the main benefit of military support would be equipment that may become available to militias.
If you want to fight and survive then you will rely on guerrilla warfare using the ample parks and forests. Know how to conceal yourself with not just camouflage but from thermal imaging as well, because drones will be used liberally. If your militia leader is decent at tactics you should be able to contribute well, as hiding and attacking vulnerable targets will be the way to defeat the enemy. Anti-tank and anti-air weapons will cause huge economic losses for the enemy. Know how to live off the land and where to scavenge and store supplies. Take a bit of gold with you to barter with shopkeepers. Most regrettably but importantly, have the mindset you'll probably lose everyone you love. You cannot protect, but you can punish, and you can make sure this never happens again to your people.
I'm sure there is a good book out there that describes everything you need to know tactics and know-how wise (and I don't mean the a—-ist c--kb--k).
>>150045Alt-lite, really? Get their info and give them a taste of their own medicine when the time comes.
As for what sides will be which, expect factions of every separatist group imaginable as well as ideological groups. If you're lucky you'll live in a (non-retarded) state that breaks away without federal interference and becomes a Russian puppet. Otherwise it will be all against all.
There will be communists, eco-terrorists, minority gangs, government employees, and "moderate socialists" who "deplore the use of violence" but "have not choice" against "those racist nationalists."
On the other side you will have Confederates, 1776'ers, AnCaps and friends (I'll be here), fascists, and of course the run-of-the-mill Republicans who "just want to restore order."
Of course these groups will very lose and may or may not coordinate. If you want to "win" you have to be utterly pragmatic. "Moderates" will not be shooting-enemies but you have to have propaganda to show how their policies led to the inevitable catastrophe, because these people WILL defend griffons for the mess they caused. On the flip side of the coin, leftists will use the "race-war now" spergs to convince zebras and tamales that our side wants to kill them all rather than have independent ethnostates (they'll probably resist this anyway 'cause of "muh entitlements," but they'll learn to like it).