/vx/ - Videogames and Paranormal

>>47940
>potential space aliens
Potentially anything else as well, more likely humans with deformities. Why would aliens look like humans anways? There's rabbit holes going into this, but I'll save it for another time. You know, I would accept cloning or human experiments any day over this.
>Bigger criminal capacity means that the brain could be bigger makes scenes to me.
Bigger brain=!more intelliegence. It isn't the entirety of the brain, mind you, and only takes a small portion of it, so it won't be taking up much of the brain. Although it's speculative, it could be said other portions of the brain wouldn't be doing much for the Paracas' intelligence. I don't know. Unless we see their brains, we can't quite so much commentate on intelligence solidly, so there's little proof these were highly intelligent people because of their brain size. The case could be made for whales or other animals with larger brains than ours or even similar to ours like walruses; in the case of something more similar, let's give the example of Neanderthals.
http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/280/1758/20130168
Neanderthals dated 27–75 ka were predicted to have had smaller cognitive group sizes (M = 115, s.d. = 19, n = 13) than contemporary fossil AMHs, whereas fossil AMHs (M = 139, s.d. = 15, n = 32) seem to have had group sizes more in line with those demonstrated for the mean personal network sizes of living humans (figure 2). What little archaeological evidence there is offers support for this: compared with Neanderthals, contemporary Eurasian AMHs had larger [72], more geographically extensive social networks [73,74]. Group size is a convenient index of the cognitive ability to deal with increasing social complexity and may thus evidence more general differences in sociocognitive abilities between these taxa."
[see third picture]
Despite having a larger cranial capacity, they possessed lower cognitive (higher thinking) and social ability due to their brain being more dedicated to vision and body control.
Now onto deformities. Because we're discussing people with natural deformities, I'll be quoting a study of how craniosynostosis affects intelligence. You made me look at a lot of deformed kids. Something I kind of wish I didn't.
http://elischolar.library.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1191&context=ymtdl
"...consistent with existing literature in showing significantly lower
intelhgence in children with syndromic craniosynostosis (mean IQ=83.1, SD=21.9)
in comparison to children with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis (mean IQ=103.4,
iS!D=14.9) and their nonafflicted peers. Despite their lower mean intelhgence,
children with syndromic craniosynostosis displayed age-appropriate rote-style
verbal and visual memory and reading skills."
And, there are other studies that either show cognitive disability or the positive effect of cranioplasty (or surgery for removing brain deformities.) People born with this abnormality are probably unlikely to be brighter than average, likely less. Longer head does not equal more intelligence, so it's unlikely your "aliens" are smart. Considering the average Peruvian IQ, which is 85, whatever inherited intelligence is inferior to Westerners. A higher estimate I found for that nation was 90, I still rest by my case. That isn't much. Also, if it isn't deformity, then it is must be kneading and we already dismissed that alien link. Your Paracas skulls show signs of kneading and artificial elongation. 300 skulls isn't much, there was a similar epidemic in Toulouse, France in which due to childcare methods, children would be left with deformed heads similar to the Paracas.
>hair though it a dark red.
That's clearly oxidation changing the colour of the hair to red over the years. You see, when left out for centuries hair loses it colour due to longterm exposure to air and basically decomposes. It's real obvious in your images.
>starchild
The skull is dated 900 years ago which during the Casa Grandes era, skull deformation was practiced. It could also be hydrocephalus. The mandible like structure stumps me though if not that case. It's a rare deformity if I've ever seen one. Or, one of the more unique skull modifications. DNA tests have been ran on the skull before, there has been human genomes shown, so it's likely human nonetheless. I've seen some fucked kids before. I can show you one that in the future, someone in a hundred years will claim to be an alien too. I'll spoiler it in the next post.
>Sorry if the tone is mean I'm just losing my patients because people don't want to use their brains.
Did I strike a nerve?

>>48073
>You know, I would accept cloning or human experiments any day over this.
It doesn't matter whether you accept it or not facts are facts (this is a logical fallacy the markings of a belief system). Now don't misconstrue my words I'm not saying that the existence of space aliens is a fact.
>Bigger brain=!more intelliegence...
>Neanderthals
human like creatures should have human like brains, therefore one can speculate that if they have 25% more cranial volume
they should be more intelligent.
>craniosynostosis
I don't thick this is the case with the Paracas skulls, why would they all
be concentrated in one place. Some other anomalies are larger orbital cavities, several molar teeth are nonexistent, and the obvious longness of the skull.
>You made me look at a lot of deformed kids. Something I kind of wish I didn't.
I'm not sure if that was necessary.
study the Pracas skulls too. Craniosynostosis make the skull elongate back not up. What about the baby long skull and the fetus with the long skull? (Image 5 & 6 thread starter.)
>That's clearly oxidation changing the colour of the hair to red over the years.. You see, when left out for centuries hair loses it...
That's preposterous. The hair oxidized in one of the most arid most dry of places Paracas Peru, they wasn't left out they was buried duh. Lo the picture, hair still black. https://frametoframe.ca/travels/peru-travelscapes/mummies-chauchilla-cemetery-nazca-peru/
Mind you this burial isn't that far from Paracas. Here's a video for your ease and comfort in the subject. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7W8-qv3m_vc
>Anent the starchild skull
If you'd used my links and had a thorough look at my thread you would have learn some pretty interesting things about said skull. here they are for you convenience anyhow.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=62&v=_vz0-1xZr_U
http://www.starchildproject.com/
>Did I strike a nerve?
O my deer boy of course you Haven't. Jokes aside, I was wrong the tone is not meaner than I was on other post hither. I was melancholic yesterday because of this >>47875 I didn't expect Virl the most well read person here to stoop to the level of an ignoramus >>44302
He always quibbled. Have a read. You on the over hand actually put some effort. Props for that, you get extra credit, here's you golden star *.

https://archive.4plebs.org/x/thread/19631067/
The absolute Fremdschämen I feel from the respondents, almost brought me to tears. Makes me embarrassed to be a part of the human race.

Ah the silence of my victory.
You know I simply must declare so.
As my argument does hold water.
If one were to look at the world without a mindset of stone one would see it more for what it is than not.

>If those last two names sound familiar, it’s probably because they had a similar “this changes everything!” moment in 2016 when DNA tests were reportedly conducted on the Paracas elongated skulls of Peru. At that time, they revealed that the test results showed the skulls were not from Peru but were not alien either. The humans were believed to have come from Europe and Mesopotamia, especially Syria. That was interesting and certainly added a twist to which humans first arrived in the Americas, but not a game-changer.
...
>“It appears that the largest elongated skulls on the planet have been found, “A” in Paracas, Peru and “B” in the Caucasus area in between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea… so my theory is that there was a sub-species of human which we are going to be eventually calling Homo-Sapiens-Sapiens-Paracas, and they were living in the area in between the Caspian and Black Sea.”

>“They were invaded by somebody… and so they were forced to flee.”
...
>“ … because of the abnormalities found with some of the Elongated Skulls from the Chongos cemetery in Peru they have no other choice but to state that some of these ancient Paracas were a sub-species of humanity… it had to be genetic, they had to be born with these abnormalities. They had dark red hair… the royal Paracas were the ones with elongated heads, not the common people… the royal family of the Paracas, they lived in subterranean underground houses and I think the reason for that is that they had light-colored skin, probably sensitive eyes because of the extreme sunshine…”
...
http://mysteriousuniverse.org/2018/02/new-dna-test-results-on-perus-elongated-skulls/

>>53225
Now you doing my work for me.
>crosses the long skulls off as being space aliens.
Though there is still much to figure.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sX08YcLr-k8
How is it that a "average" man is doing archaeological research? shouldn't the academics be looking into this? Why do you then trust anything that they tell you?

>>41383
Some, but little physical evidence. The human deformities you are using in OP certainly aren't examples.

But there have been a very few cases where inexplicable phenomenon have been documented. Every one of these cases have all had one single thing in common: The individual(s) involved in the phenomenon have all been involved with the occult. There ''are'' ayylmaos alright, and they are all demonic beings.

>>56165
All I can say to you is take a thorough read through my thread.
>The individual(s) involved in the phenomenon have all been involved with the occult.
I would like you to prove that.
even vril the blockhead he is, finally found out that true long skulls (which have not been elongated but) are indeed naturally so! See >>53225
Be logical. Logic is the ability to reason without believe systems which interfere.

It's good to learn about Space aliens, however the posthumanist agenda is more worrying to me than space aliens. It poses great peril to life; our existence as we know it and freedom.

>>41383
>Have We any evidence for other worldly beings?
I think there are still a few of those "jew" things running around.

>>62141
Eh? Whatever that means, it doesn't inspire me with much hope for the human race.

B.U.M.P.