/vx/ - Videogames and Paranormal

>>42009
Fin.

You've convinced me that history has weird things in it. Something I already knew. But obviously these things come from congress with the Devil. The evidence is plane to see!

Sapiens vs Neanderthals, pic #1. Notice the elongated head and the bun. What you will find is many human decorations, modifications and figurines emphasise these features. Notice the strong eye ridges, you will see these emphasised as well.

45K years ago : Sapiens arrive in Europe
40K ya : Neanderthals exstinct

They had 5000 years together. Pic #2 is from this time period. The Lion Man, to me, is a depictions of a Neanderthal. Think of carvings as being like cartoon caricature.

There are other carvings but they are of women primitive porn! so I will leave them out.

12K ya : pic #3 again emphasising long head and the Neanderthal bun. The hanging part is probably a pony tail to emphasis "wise Neanderthal". But neanderthals have been extinct for ~30K years.

From this onwards figurines continue the long head theme up to civilization starting at about 5K ya. Pic #4-5.

I propose that humans have been elongating skulls one way or another for 40,000 years to seem wise and to fool ordinary citizens. Typical.

So now a question about pre birth long skulls. Would primitives cut a woman open and try to elongate the skull of a baby in the womb? Bearing in mind they quite happily cut out beating hearts to appease gods.

---

Odd DNA is still interesting, but you'll need to show me the alien father and his home planet, to have me concede it was aliens. I have no objections to human evolution being significantly more weird than science says.

>>42068
>The evidence is plane to see!
No it isn't.
All you have shown is ancient stone figures.
Nice quibble virbble better luck next time.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pe3rceR5JMk
William Tompkins previously unaffiliated with Corey good give us basically the same information as Corey Goode. Affirming Goode's information. William Tompkins has recently passed away. Press F to express homage. I am an advocate of logic, Logic dictates my conclusions. If you were really interested in the truth, that is factuality you wouldn't dismiss my resources in the matter at hand. Naught can be verified until witnessed for one's self, however we can ascertain how likely it is for the information to be true by separate unaffiliated sources what relate their information.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hV9PEbvRzj0
Highly intriguing watch!

>>42126
I Just thought this was an interesting video. I wouldn't take it face value.

Oops!
>>42188
put *at in between it & face.
>>42124
Replace what with *that.

>>42197
I used to be where you are now. Then I timelined the UFO/alien phenomena. Then I added into that human technology timeline. They correlated. That's why I can't be impressed, like you, anymore by this hype. I am immune.

>Naught can be verified until witnessed for one's self, however we can ascertain how likely it is for the information to be true by separate unaffiliated sources what relate their information.

God is real then, and he split that rock. Solved.

>>42205
>God is real then, and he split that rock. Solved.
I don't understand Vril how did you come to that conclusion God's principle is of non-interference. "God" Creator is real and I can prove it through simple logic. Correct me if I'm wrong.
If I do nothing, nothing will happen
Therefore if there wasn't a Creator there would be no creation.
>I used to be where you are now. Then I timelined the UFO/alien phenomena. Then I added into that human technology timeline. They correlated. That's why I can't be impressed, like you, anymore by this hype. I am immune.
You forgot to put vimana in your timeline, tell me how many lores & myths of the various cultures do you know of?
Your replies aren't very logical. that hurts your credibility.
You're still quibbling, that also hurts you as it shews that I have a strong argument which you thus far have failed to defeat, and so you evade the point, this thread was made to counter yours which I see as disinformation and to get people to question, are we alone here?
Answer me this how would you explain Niara Isley account? How is there correlation between what she say and what Corey Goode says when they haven't met? Note: Niara had to get her memory back through hypnosis. If you quibble / avoid the questions my argument still stands until proven otherwise. If you don't answer at all my argument still stands.

Oh wow, something interesting.
(Catches up on the thread)

Aliens have never been too interesting to me because most of them are a LARP, but I have these.

>>42361
An even better argument is that you cannot explain how the laws of physics existed without a creator. Gravity had to exist before the universe could create itself.

>>42451
Your enthusiasm is exhilarating.

>>42361
>I don't understand Vril how did you come to that conclusion
It was sarcasm. A mystery does not prove [insert favourite belief system] is true.

>You forgot to put vimana in your timeline,
How do you tell the difference between a fictional story and a factual story? Will a superman comic seem like a historical person in a few thousand year? Mind you the helix and mercury is interesting. Mercury was the first superconductor and rotating it would be part of what I expect for artificial gravity. But how did it get cooled to superconductivity temperatures? Also physics works the same for humans and aliens, so why can only aliens be it's operator, assuming it was not fiction? Why not Atlantians or Lemurians?

After you show me the Vimana, then point to the alien. After some tests, I'll be convinced.

I don't trust Corey Good. He himself might be being honest or not. If he is being honest then we still have the MKULTRA style mind control programming that has possibly been done on him. Here is an example of that attch #1.

And I can point to a human, you can't point to an alien. My claim is more solid.

Gorey Goode has met Ra up on the moon. Here is RA, a 1980s channelled being: https://www.lawofone.info/ who is now a 2010s space alien. Curious.

>Niara Isley
>hypnosis

Alarm bells. Hypnosis can make and recover memories.

Both these accounts are on shaky ground. Since I am asserting there is a conspiracy (using hypnosis, props and technology) to make alien memories then these two people could have had memories introduced from a common third party, leading to similarities.

And I can prove MKULTRA existed. Again you can't prove aliens.

You: something weird happened = aliens
Me: something weird happened = mystery, with a bias to what I can prove = humans love to fuck each other over.

I realise the thrill of aliens evokes many interesting possibilities. After 1-2 decades the thrill factor will wear off unless they actually do the hoax well.

Have you read 1950s alien abduction books?

>>42454
>>42455
I have a copy of the original publication (1992) those come from. There is also updated version online. https://archive.org/details/DasVrilProjekt

Want to see the alleged report of the first version of the Nazi "Round Flight Tool"? pic #1 & 2 ... now I suppose you want that translated :)

Badly google translated:

RFZ 1 and RFZ 2

What to say about the RFZ, that is "Round Flight Tool" which is built from the site of the company Arado in the summer of the year 35, this one must first be seen from
the RFZ I from which had already been built before and as such showed itself as a failure, if one wants to see it as an airplane, Exactly, was not.

The RFZ I was already made in June 34. It was an attempt to get the SM drive train flying. The only flying experiment, RFZ I, got about 60 m high, danced in the air for
almost five minutes and was then able to land again.

The pilot, Lothar Weiz, was able to jump out before the equipment in the bazaar became more and more powerful like a gyro, thereby breaking the end of RFZ I.

On the other hand, RFZ II was a real flying machine, which one would actually call the first flying aircraft, at least as far as I know of such an RFZ II had an improve
d SM-Lev engine and impulse control. There was no longer a tailplane of a conventional kind. RFZ II also had a landing device, which could only be exited once. It was n
ecessary to get it on the ground, which only went down from below, and "tension" it.
For the landing, it could then be left out. The starter "prone" from a wooden frame. The three legs of the landing gear looked like tall stilts, which were necessary, a
s the control had not yet allowed a precise landing and therefore also had to be suitable for uneven terrain. Very unpleasant was the pulpit, which was later converted
to a pressurised cabin. Since the SM-engine took up the entire space of the disk body, the turret/cockpit had to be placed on top. The pilot certainly had a kneeling at
titude.

The flight performance of RFZ II was very impressive until the control, which allowed only sudden direction changes of 22.5° each.
The reliability of this aircraft was remarkable.
Weighed the problematic control and also probably for other reasons, RFZ II was mothballed to the end of 40. Then the device was revived. Two 2 cm outboard machine guns
were installed in panels.

Although RFZ II has remained a single item, it has been used for long-distance reconnaissance flights and has been very well received.

----

Pic #3 is a time line of modern events leading to the Nazi UFO images online. I found no obvious flaws in the narrative.

>>42458
>After you show me the Vimana, then point to the alien. After some tests, I'll be convinced.
Picture I know I'm cheeky also Starchild skull still the best evidence.
I'll read you paper clip later.
> I'll be convinced.
I'm not trying to convince you, I'm just putting up an counter argument the problem is that you have dismissed my thread and are acting all elitist.
>I don't trust Corey Good.
I simply catalog. The truth is out there one actually need leave his computer and find it.
>If he is being honest then we still have the MKULTRA style mind control programming that has possibly been done on him.
he talk about that. It has been done on him only in the opposite way from what you proposed. They erased his memory which he calls blank slating and then they added false memories so that it is like it never happened. You haven't invested that much into figuring Cosmic Disclosure out have you just like you did with me. We are all under one sort of mind control or another.
Why do you think the world is such a mess?
>And I can point to a human, you can't point to an alien. My claim is more solid.
What's this That you didn't even consider looking into (The Starchild skull). I mean one can't be 100% sure, but one could be 20% cooler if he would acknowledge the fact that it is pretty compelling evidence is it not?
>Gorey Goode has met Ra up on the moon. Here is RA...
I am yet to see a problem here.
>Alarm bells. Hypnosis can make and recover memories.
Not sure it was hypnosis exactly as I watched this a while ago. Did you watch the video?
>And I can prove MKULTRA existed
I know it exists. I believe you the mind control thing OK, got it, understand.
>Again you can't prove aliens.
Again again STARCHILD SKULL ITS STILL THE BLOODY ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM!
>You: something weird happened = aliens
oh fECK h0w could i've be wrong about myself.
>I realise the thrill of aliens evokes many interesting possibilities. After 1-2 decades the thrill factor will wear off unless they actually do the hoax well.
Sometimes one must ask himself am I a block head?
is my house a box? Do I think inside or out side of the proverbial box?
>Have you read 1950s alien abduction books?
I no have read book. But I check ok.
Now with all that being said, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, suppose you're right, what then? What danger am I in if I'm wrong?

>>42508
Bye.

>>42509
Same time tomorrow?

>>42455
>An even better argument is that you cannot explain how the laws of physics existed without a creator.
who said they did? picture this your at the beginning of creation all is naught, you are in limbo. How can you judge whether physics exist or not if there is literally nothing to judge them by.
>Gravity had to exist before the universe could create itself.
Why? I'm not a scientist so I don't know.
The universe could create Itself wouldn't that imply that the universe is God?
if not it is akin to a blank canvas painting its self a picture.

>>41383
>How do you tell the difference between a fictional story and a factual story?
Does myth and legend lie?
https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/science/a-giant-ground-sloth-was-found-at-sea-tac-airport-56-years-ago/
>Will a superman comic seem like a historical person in a few thousand year?
I doubt it we don't hold super hero comics with the importance that the Indians did to their historical works such as the Bhagavad Gita.

Actually scratch this >>41383 number.
This >>42458 was the one I responded to.

>>42511
The Paracas skulls were formed in the same manner that tribal mothers across the world, most notable being several US native tribes, have done. Compression, binding, fixation, skull kneading/rolling, are used to create such shapes. As you yourself stated, the Paracas skulls show large deviations from each other. Logically, this indicates those same techniques were not used equally on all subjected children. However, abnormal genetic mutations cause roughly 6,000 children each year to be born with enlarged, exaggerated, or flat out strange skull formations. ONE random skull of a distinct genetic aberrant with overall human characteristics from whom knows how many millennia back does not prove the existence of ayyliens. On the contrary, the universe is wide, vast, and strange. It is, most importantly, dead. Of suspicious note here is that the so called "starchild skull" is used as proof-of-claim for an offshoot of the catholic cult called, wait for, it, "The Starchildren", a neo-cult which claims that skull "proves angels exist". Even more curious, "The Starchildren" cult was created shortly after Project MKULTA began. Were there hundreds of such examples rather than a single cherry picked anomaly, then you may be on to something. This is a single mutation, like the hundreds of thousands of others in history, that has zero fantastic verification.

>>42458
>The CIA has engaged in concocted UFO (flying saucer) events since 1955 with a program called OPERATION MIRAGE.
>REAL UFO events have occurred but hundreds of UFO episodes(worldwide) have been simulated by the CIA using experimental technologies, mid altering drugs, and psychological inducements.

I never refuted that government agencies such as the CIA don't have the ability to fake UFO's & have not faked UFO's sightings and the sort. Notice tho' Real UFO events have occurred... It states.
but what does this have to do with the 900 year old Starchild skull or the long skulls which are 3000 year old or the Atacama humanoid whom no one durst figure yet. I know how vigilant we must be, everything is against us. Including other human beings.
Making displays of holographic UFOs shouldn't be that hard. Methinks, it is possible.

>>43178
>The Paracas skulls were formed in the same manner that tribal mothers across the world, most notable being several US native tribes, have done.
O really so why is it that a Pracas skull
measured up to 25% lager cranial volume and is 60% heavier than a normal human skull? No amount of headbinding will increase the cranial capacity. This was stated in one of the videos. So far most of the comments I've been getting are quibbles & ignoramus comments.
>skull kneading/rolling
LOL!!! Just imagine a mother rolling/kneading her child's skull like a pizza dough mamma mia into an elongated shape.
>As you yourself stated, the Paracas skulls show large deviations from each other. Logically, this indicates those same techniques were not used equally on all subjected children.
Ueeh listen "doc" Explain to me why the skulls have red hair see pic, in contrast to the native south Americans we see today (I literally wrote of this)?
I sense some major cognitive dissonance.
> abnormal genetic mutations cause roughly 6,000 children each year to be born with enlarged, exaggerated, or flat out strange skull formations.
Listen (("Doc")) Major mutation are fatal meaning that the starchild wouldn't be able to survive to adulthood. That right its a misnomer. Please I beg of you read and watch through everything at least in the thread starter.
>It is, most importantly, dead.
Pray tell how do you know?
>Of suspicious note here is that the so called "starchild skull" is used as proof-of-claim for an offshoot of the catholic cult called, wait for, it, "The Starchildren"...
More equivocating? Vril anon has been doing the same. I wont bother any more with quibbles.
>MKULTA
I'm Not entirely sure how it works care to explain? Now I could go into more reasons as to why I think its not a normal human skull but have better things to do. Anyways you gots smarts, use critical thinking.
I mean I could be wrong, you just need to do a better job to disprove me.

>>43992
The picture to your right is an elongated skull, the one to your left is what I believe to be a naturally long skull.

>>43992
This is one of the more retarded posts I have read here. You have not researched what "cranial capacity" even means. "THERE'S EXTRA SPACE SO THAT MEANS THE BRAIN IS BIGGER!" That is not how biology works. You made a bullshit strawman extrapolation with no scientific validation or reasoning behind the claim. Not all major mutations are fatal, didn't even do your own research on that one. Now, for your information, here's a partial list of the known peoples that performed cranial deformation: the Aborigines of Australia, Allemanics, Burgundians, Chinook, Choctaw, Gepids, Heruli, Huns, Incans, Lucayans, Macrocephali, Mayans, Ostrogoths, Salishan, Toulousian French, some Saxon tribes, Nazcans, Rugil, and the Vanuatuans. This was a fairly wide spread occurrence across the world.

tl;dr: you're a fucking shill trying to push "BUT IT'S AYYYLIENS GOY, JUST BELIEVE ME AND MY SUPERIOR UTTERLY VALID OPINION!"

>>44302
> You have not researched what "cranial capacity" even means. "THERE'S EXTRA SPACE SO THAT MEANS THE BRAIN IS BIGGER!"
That's exactly what I meant.
> Now, for your information, here's a partial list of the known peoples that performed cranial deformation: the Aborigines of Australia,...
What of it? They were probably mimicking beings that had long skull, why don't you ask them?
>tl;dr: you're a fucking shill trying to push "BUT IT'S AYYYLIENS GOY, JUST BELIEVE ME AND MY SUPERIOR UTTERLY VALID OPINION!"
I'm a shill for talking anent curious archaeological discovers and speculating on whether of not it might be space alien.
Your wording is Maladroit,
Is that all you got, so much for disproving me.
"Opinions" more like observations.
Where are your manners?

I have defended my argument well no one yet has proven me wrong. I think it is safe to say that I have won this argument(it has grown silent hither). Only two people durst write to me on this subject they quibbled a lot! One in particular Vribble (Vril Anon.). Wherefore is everyone else so indifferent?

>>47862
>(((anon))) thinks he's won an argument about (((AYYYYLIENS))) by strawman extrapolations
>confirms himself "winner" because everyone else has avoided getting involved in the shitshow
>doesn't research cranial capacity
>fails to show logical conclusions
>fails to give proper argument other than ((("IT'S ALIENS GOYIM, JUST BELIEVE ME")))
No one cares about your pro-ShareBlue/CAP/CIA/Mossad shilling thread. Most users have been around long enough to spot bullshit. Mods, delete this thread, it's taking up valuable space on this board.

>>47862
>>47875
Figures 1 & 2 here are all naturally occurring deformities commonally referred to as craniosynostosis. All recorded examples today would serve to be unrelated to aliens at all, but as developmental deformities that usually happens when two parts of the skull improperly conjoin. There are supposedly no studies indicating a correlation between cranial capacity and intelligence, however there are studies linking brain grey matter size and intelligence (which would be a nonfactor here.)
On skull kneading, there are a number of theories for it like social ones. Whether or not to please or imitate aliens, that would have to fall on the person suggesting it to prove it, and not who is trying to disprove it. Otherwise it is pontification.

>>47875
That's right let the cognitive dissonance flow through you.
>No one cares about your pro-ShareBlue/CAP/CIA/Mossad shilling thread.
Its easy to believe the status quo ain't it. That why, that is there religion and it is yours too to an extent, varying bloke to bloke.
>doesn't research cranial capacity
O forgive me I assume that when their was a brain in there that it filed up the whole skull you know that extra 25%. according to Marriam-Webster crainal capacity is: the cubic capacity of the braincase estimated for the living by a formula based on head measurements and determined for the skull by filling the cranial cavity with particulate material (as mustard seed or small shot) and measuring the volume of the latter.
Which is pretty much what I thought it mean. I just don't know what went wrong?
NO REally what went wrong, what's wrong here what is your point explain yourself?
I better heed your pictures 'cause that's what your doing to me.
>fails to show logical conclusions
the conclusion is meh what about the video about the starchild skull. What not logical enough for a wiz scientist like yourself. You know kids science is a religion too. marked by Hyper skepticism and the sorts.
You know your not very nice are you sure you watched MLP:FiM?
>fails to give proper argument other than
So what is the star child skull we know it not a human it has to may... you know what enjoy you slumber. Also what is it with you and strawmen I don't fallow. Is it a fetish :-]?
>confirms himself "winner" because everyone else has avoided getting involved in the shitshow
Hay its not my fault their all Coward, it is of my understanding that quibbling & subterfuge are use when one can't prove someone wrong, I have seen on the the main board that when someone gets something wrong everyone points it out and make it obvious that their wrong. Mine is not the case. LOok I can be mean too,ACawhahaha you thought I would stoop to you level knave.

>>47906
>unrelated to aliens
Notice I said potential space aliens.
>There are supposedly no studies indicating a correlation between cranial capacity and intelligence, however there are studies linking brain grey matter size and intelligence (which would be a nonfactor here.)
Bigger criminal capacity means that the brain could be bigger makes scenes to me.
>that would have to fall on the person suggesting it to prove it, and not who is trying to disprove it.
Why? you lazy? Some tribal people who practice head-binding say that they are mimicking their ancestors. You didn't address the starchild skull (*check the thread starter*)
Nor the fact that some long skulls with hair still intact have red hair though it a dark red.
Do your own research if you're interested. Be sure to look about the thread.
I just made this thread to spread bread crumbs not to educate you, but to inform you.
Also the Paracas skulls do not suffer from craniosynostosis. I mean what are the odds for 300 skull to suffer from this. Sorry if the tone is mean I'm just losing my patients because people don't want to use their brains. I bid thee fare well.

>>47940
>potential space aliens
Potentially anything else as well, more likely humans with deformities. Why would aliens look like humans anways? There's rabbit holes going into this, but I'll save it for another time. You know, I would accept cloning or human experiments any day over this.
>Bigger criminal capacity means that the brain could be bigger makes scenes to me.
Bigger brain=!more intelliegence. It isn't the entirety of the brain, mind you, and only takes a small portion of it, so it won't be taking up much of the brain. Although it's speculative, it could be said other portions of the brain wouldn't be doing much for the Paracas' intelligence. I don't know. Unless we see their brains, we can't quite so much commentate on intelligence solidly, so there's little proof these were highly intelligent people because of their brain size. The case could be made for whales or other animals with larger brains than ours or even similar to ours like walruses; in the case of something more similar, let's give the example of Neanderthals.
http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/280/1758/20130168
Neanderthals dated 27–75 ka were predicted to have had smaller cognitive group sizes (M = 115, s.d. = 19, n = 13) than contemporary fossil AMHs, whereas fossil AMHs (M = 139, s.d. = 15, n = 32) seem to have had group sizes more in line with those demonstrated for the mean personal network sizes of living humans (figure 2). What little archaeological evidence there is offers support for this: compared with Neanderthals, contemporary Eurasian AMHs had larger [72], more geographically extensive social networks [73,74]. Group size is a convenient index of the cognitive ability to deal with increasing social complexity and may thus evidence more general differences in sociocognitive abilities between these taxa."
[see third picture]
Despite having a larger cranial capacity, they possessed lower cognitive (higher thinking) and social ability due to their brain being more dedicated to vision and body control.
Now onto deformities. Because we're discussing people with natural deformities, I'll be quoting a study of how craniosynostosis affects intelligence. You made me look at a lot of deformed kids. Something I kind of wish I didn't.
http://elischolar.library.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1191&context=ymtdl
"...consistent with existing literature in showing significantly lower
intelhgence in children with syndromic craniosynostosis (mean IQ=83.1, SD=21.9)
in comparison to children with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis (mean IQ=103.4,
iS!D=14.9) and their nonafflicted peers. Despite their lower mean intelhgence,
children with syndromic craniosynostosis displayed age-appropriate rote-style
verbal and visual memory and reading skills."
And, there are other studies that either show cognitive disability or the positive effect of cranioplasty (or surgery for removing brain deformities.) People born with this abnormality are probably unlikely to be brighter than average, likely less. Longer head does not equal more intelligence, so it's unlikely your "aliens" are smart. Considering the average Peruvian IQ, which is 85, whatever inherited intelligence is inferior to Westerners. A higher estimate I found for that nation was 90, I still rest by my case. That isn't much. Also, if it isn't deformity, then it is must be kneading and we already dismissed that alien link. Your Paracas skulls show signs of kneading and artificial elongation. 300 skulls isn't much, there was a similar epidemic in Toulouse, France in which due to childcare methods, children would be left with deformed heads similar to the Paracas.
>hair though it a dark red.
That's clearly oxidation changing the colour of the hair to red over the years. You see, when left out for centuries hair loses it colour due to longterm exposure to air and basically decomposes. It's real obvious in your images.
>starchild
The skull is dated 900 years ago which during the Casa Grandes era, skull deformation was practiced. It could also be hydrocephalus. The mandible like structure stumps me though if not that case. It's a rare deformity if I've ever seen one. Or, one of the more unique skull modifications. DNA tests have been ran on the skull before, there has been human genomes shown, so it's likely human nonetheless. I've seen some fucked kids before. I can show you one that in the future, someone in a hundred years will claim to be an alien too. I'll spoiler it in the next post.
>Sorry if the tone is mean I'm just losing my patients because people don't want to use their brains.
Did I strike a nerve?

>>48073
>You know, I would accept cloning or human experiments any day over this.
It doesn't matter whether you accept it or not facts are facts (this is a logical fallacy the markings of a belief system). Now don't misconstrue my words I'm not saying that the existence of space aliens is a fact.
>Bigger brain=!more intelliegence...
>Neanderthals
human like creatures should have human like brains, therefore one can speculate that if they have 25% more cranial volume
they should be more intelligent.
>craniosynostosis
I don't thick this is the case with the Paracas skulls, why would they all
be concentrated in one place. Some other anomalies are larger orbital cavities, several molar teeth are nonexistent, and the obvious longness of the skull.
>You made me look at a lot of deformed kids. Something I kind of wish I didn't.
I'm not sure if that was necessary.
study the Pracas skulls too. Craniosynostosis make the skull elongate back not up. What about the baby long skull and the fetus with the long skull? (Image 5 & 6 thread starter.)
>That's clearly oxidation changing the colour of the hair to red over the years.. You see, when left out for centuries hair loses it...
That's preposterous. The hair oxidized in one of the most arid most dry of places Paracas Peru, they wasn't left out they was buried duh. Lo the picture, hair still black. https://frametoframe.ca/travels/peru-travelscapes/mummies-chauchilla-cemetery-nazca-peru/
Mind you this burial isn't that far from Paracas. Here's a video for your ease and comfort in the subject. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7W8-qv3m_vc
>Anent the starchild skull
If you'd used my links and had a thorough look at my thread you would have learn some pretty interesting things about said skull. here they are for you convenience anyhow.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=62&v=_vz0-1xZr_U
http://www.starchildproject.com/
>Did I strike a nerve?
O my deer boy of course you Haven't. Jokes aside, I was wrong the tone is not meaner than I was on other post hither. I was melancholic yesterday because of this >>47875 I didn't expect Virl the most well read person here to stoop to the level of an ignoramus >>44302
He always quibbled. Have a read. You on the over hand actually put some effort. Props for that, you get extra credit, here's you golden star *.

https://archive.4plebs.org/x/thread/19631067/
The absolute Fremdschämen I feel from the respondents, almost brought me to tears. Makes me embarrassed to be a part of the human race.

Ah the silence of my victory.
You know I simply must declare so.
As my argument does hold water.
If one were to look at the world without a mindset of stone one would see it more for what it is than not.

>If those last two names sound familiar, it’s probably because they had a similar “this changes everything!” moment in 2016 when DNA tests were reportedly conducted on the Paracas elongated skulls of Peru. At that time, they revealed that the test results showed the skulls were not from Peru but were not alien either. The humans were believed to have come from Europe and Mesopotamia, especially Syria. That was interesting and certainly added a twist to which humans first arrived in the Americas, but not a game-changer.
...
>“It appears that the largest elongated skulls on the planet have been found, “A” in Paracas, Peru and “B” in the Caucasus area in between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea… so my theory is that there was a sub-species of human which we are going to be eventually calling Homo-Sapiens-Sapiens-Paracas, and they were living in the area in between the Caspian and Black Sea.”

>“They were invaded by somebody… and so they were forced to flee.”
...
>“ … because of the abnormalities found with some of the Elongated Skulls from the Chongos cemetery in Peru they have no other choice but to state that some of these ancient Paracas were a sub-species of humanity… it had to be genetic, they had to be born with these abnormalities. They had dark red hair… the royal Paracas were the ones with elongated heads, not the common people… the royal family of the Paracas, they lived in subterranean underground houses and I think the reason for that is that they had light-colored skin, probably sensitive eyes because of the extreme sunshine…”
...
http://mysteriousuniverse.org/2018/02/new-dna-test-results-on-perus-elongated-skulls/

>>53225
Now you doing my work for me.
>crosses the long skulls off as being space aliens.
Though there is still much to figure.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sX08YcLr-k8
How is it that a "average" man is doing archaeological research? shouldn't the academics be looking into this? Why do you then trust anything that they tell you?

>>41383
Some, but little physical evidence. The human deformities you are using in OP certainly aren't examples.

But there have been a very few cases where inexplicable phenomenon have been documented. Every one of these cases have all had one single thing in common: The individual(s) involved in the phenomenon have all been involved with the occult. There ''are'' ayylmaos alright, and they are all demonic beings.

>>56165
All I can say to you is take a thorough read through my thread.
>The individual(s) involved in the phenomenon have all been involved with the occult.
I would like you to prove that.
even vril the blockhead he is, finally found out that true long skulls (which have not been elongated but) are indeed naturally so! See >>53225
Be logical. Logic is the ability to reason without believe systems which interfere.

It's good to learn about Space aliens, however the posthumanist agenda is more worrying to me than space aliens. It poses great peril to life; our existence as we know it and freedom.

>>41383
>Have We any evidence for other worldly beings?
I think there are still a few of those "jew" things running around.

>>62141
Eh? Whatever that means, it doesn't inspire me with much hope for the human race.

B.U.M.P.