The Work you see is a work in progress in a subject as vast and extensive as this one.
Mister Vril Society Made a thread in which he asserts his premise that UFOs are man's doings & aliens man's imaginings. I am at odds with this for I have found possible evidence. In picture 1 counting from right to left we see to the right what is known as the The Starchild Skull next to an ordinary skull.
http://www.starchildproject.com/
>The Starchild Skull's provenance begins in the 1930s.
>During the 1930s an American teenage girl >went on holiday to Mexico with her family, >who were of Mexican heritage. While >visiting a small village in Mexico's >Copper Canyon region she went exploring on >her own and discovered an abandoned mine >tunnel. Inside it she found a full human >skeleton lying on its back. Beside it was >an area of disturbed ground with an arm >bone sticking out of the dirt and the hand >bones wrapped around the upper arm bone of >the skeleton lying on the surface. Using >her hands she dug the buried skeleton >which she described as smaller than the >other, and "misshapen" out of its shallow grave.
>The girl gathered up all of the bones, and >hid them nearby with the intention of >returning for them later during her >vacation. She claimed that at some point >soon afterwards there was a flash flood >that washed most of the bones away, >however the girl found the two skulls, the >misshapen one now damaged, lodged in >debris along the flood path, and took them >home with her back to Texas, USA, where >she kept them the rest of her life.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lOSbRCg0B4g
Pictures 2,3,4,5, & 6 are the so called elongated Paracas skulls, potentially not of this world.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-QnF_RvEaAg
There is variety among the Paracas long skulls, which I didn't categorized. As if there were different races of long skull
humanoids. Main stream science states that these skulls are artificially deformed by headbinding.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_cranial_deformation
What is funny is that if you scroll down nigh the bottom of the page you'll see picture 6 which according to Wikipedia is
Dr. Leopold Muller lithography of a fetus, in the intrauterine position, with the typical huanca skull shape in the Spanish
version of the 'Peruvian Antiquities' (1851) which was found in a mummy of a pregnant woman.
>headbinding begins approximately a month after birth and continues for about six months.
You mean to tell me that the baby's head was that way at birth, bah humbug the drawing is a fake!
What? Not enough evidence for you?
Feast your eyen upon image 5 which is a new born child. that's too shore of a time for the child's head to elongate like that. Note in image 3 we see that the hair still on the skull is a dark red which unlike the dark haired natives leads me to believe that this individual would have had a light complexion.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PB-KYC-7qiU
Excerpt fro video
"Whatever the sample labeled 3A has came from - it had mtDNA with mutation unknown in any human, primate or animal known so far. The data are very sketchy though and a LOT of sequencing still needs to be done to recover the complete mtDNA sequence. but a few fragments I was able to sequence from this sample 3A indicate that if these mutation will hold we are dealing with a new human-like creature, very distant from homo sapiens, Neanderthals and Denisovans.. I am not sure it will even fit into the known Evolutionary tree. the question is if they were so different, they could not interbreed with humans. breeding within their small population, they may have degenerated due to inbreeding. That would explain buried children- they were either low or not viable."
If you would like to look at more long skulls go
here: http://www.soul-guidance.com/houseofthesun/elongatedskullsancientraces.html#Middle_and_South_America
here: http://www.am-sur.com/am-sur/peru/Ica/museo-regional-de-Ica/ENGL/03-02-Paracas-culture-deformes-skulls-and-skull-operations.html
and here: https://www.youtube.com/user/brienfoerster/
pictures 7 & 8 are of the Atacama humanoid of which I'm not versed well
enough to speak of, but provide you with the fact that it exists.
Dare you figure?
/vx/ - Videogames and Paranormal
14 replies and 12 files omitted.
Strange looking humans does not mean from the stars, it means strange looking humans.
1515123629.jpg (56.4 KB, 593x850, zilco-sl-driving-bridle-with-blinkers-325-p.jpg)
>>41390
Come on m8 did you not watch the videos have you not read what I wrote. it is no wonder you missed quite the substantial evidence of non-earthlings. You've gone chosen only the articles for your premise.
>Strange looking humans does not mean from the stars, it means strange looking humans.
Nice quibble lad but its going to take a lot more than that to disprove me.
O and by the way take these of while your at it.
Come on m8 did you not watch the videos have you not read what I wrote. it is no wonder you missed quite the substantial evidence of non-earthlings. You've gone chosen only the articles for your premise.
>Strange looking humans does not mean from the stars, it means strange looking humans.
Nice quibble lad but its going to take a lot more than that to disprove me.
O and by the way take these of while your at it.
>>41423
I am aware of these things. Human history and mythology is full of strange looking humans. Both giants and little people. I dispute the assumption that it means ET.
To prove ET I want evidence of a civilisation on another planet with a documented history of being there with archaeological evidence. I don't put it beyond humanity to stage ET evidence in space with secret space missions. Yes I am paranoid.
You won't be providing that, so all the evidence you have can be explained with various types of unacknowledged human evolution or other techniques.
I have assumed that Neanderthals and humans spent some time together and some managed to survive quite a while, they seem to have been smarter than us, so humans tried to emulate their appearance.
[Read more] I am aware of these things. Human history and mythology is full of strange looking humans. Both giants and little people. I dispute the assumption that it means ET.
To prove ET I want evidence of a civilisation on another planet with a documented history of being there with archaeological evidence. I don't put it beyond humanity to stage ET evidence in space with secret space missions. Yes I am paranoid.
You won't be providing that, so all the evidence you have can be explained with various types of unacknowledged human evolution or other techniques.
I have assumed that Neanderthals and humans spent some time together and some managed to survive quite a while, they seem to have been smarter than us, so humans tried to emulate their appearance.
>>41442
>To prove ET I want evidence of a civilisation on another planet with a documented history of being there with archaeological evidence.
>You won't be providing that
Well buddy your in luck cus we need not look farther Than Mars. observe.
Of course more research need be done.
Also them syndicates of the state are pretty good to fake the Starchild Skull's being 900 year old and such. such rigid skepticism. What does government get from going to such lengths as to fake a skull which isn't even intact and then suppress the truth about it? such is the case with other anomalies that don't fit the mains stream narrative. Why fake an Aliens?
To establish the new world order?
Yes they can fake it but that doesn't mean that all UFOs are our UFOs.
No I don't think aliens are here to save us, in fact they are more of a threat.
Over and out.
[Read more] >To prove ET I want evidence of a civilisation on another planet with a documented history of being there with archaeological evidence.
>You won't be providing that
Well buddy your in luck cus we need not look farther Than Mars. observe.
Of course more research need be done.
Also them syndicates of the state are pretty good to fake the Starchild Skull's being 900 year old and such. such rigid skepticism. What does government get from going to such lengths as to fake a skull which isn't even intact and then suppress the truth about it? such is the case with other anomalies that don't fit the mains stream narrative. Why fake an Aliens?
To establish the new world order?
Yes they can fake it but that doesn't mean that all UFOs are our UFOs.
No I don't think aliens are here to save us, in fact they are more of a threat.
Over and out.
>>41504
The Mars Face is interesting, but there is counter arguments.
https://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2001/ast24may_1/
So it is stalemated for now.
But this evidence, even if it was signs of a previous civilization, is obviously a long dead one. But debating this is kinda stupid, no proof and resolution will emerge.
I am not making any statement about governments doing things to "starchild" skulls. So I don't know why you are asking me straw man questions.
I agree that we can't assume all UFOs are human, equally we can't assume any are ET. Assuming is bad. We are stuck awaiting more evidence. What we can say is that somewhere between 'some' and 'all' are human and/or natural phenomena.
The "aliens", that is these continuations of MKULTRA mind control experiments, have no interest in helping us. These people are perfecting manipulation over us. And it is working out quite well for them, as your posts show.... until Trump drains the swamp.
Have a read of the books here: >>40429 → and see the correlations between human advanced tech and "alien" tech.
Also have a read of early 1900s "aliens" and see how advanced they aren't. http://www.cufos.org/HUMCAT/
Over and out.
[Read more] The Mars Face is interesting, but there is counter arguments.
https://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2001/ast24may_1/
So it is stalemated for now.
But this evidence, even if it was signs of a previous civilization, is obviously a long dead one. But debating this is kinda stupid, no proof and resolution will emerge.
I am not making any statement about governments doing things to "starchild" skulls. So I don't know why you are asking me straw man questions.
I agree that we can't assume all UFOs are human, equally we can't assume any are ET. Assuming is bad. We are stuck awaiting more evidence. What we can say is that somewhere between 'some' and 'all' are human and/or natural phenomena.
The "aliens", that is these continuations of MKULTRA mind control experiments, have no interest in helping us. These people are perfecting manipulation over us. And it is working out quite well for them, as your posts show.... until Trump drains the swamp.
Have a read of the books here: >>40429 → and see the correlations between human advanced tech and "alien" tech.
Also have a read of early 1900s "aliens" and see how advanced they aren't. http://www.cufos.org/HUMCAT/
Over and out.
>>41442
>I have assumed that Neanderthals and humans spent some time together and some managed to survive quite a while, they seem to have been smarter than us, so humans tried to emulate their appearance.
I not sure the long skull being are Neanderthals.
"Whatever the sample labeled 3A has came from - it had mtDNA with mutation unknown in any human, primate or animal known so far. The data are very sketchy though and a LOT of sequencing still needs to be done to recover the complete mtDNA sequence. but a few fragments I was able to sequence from this sample 3A indicate that if these mutation will hold we are dealing with a new human-like creature, very distant from homo sapiens, Neanderthals and Denisovans.. I am not sure it will even fit into the known Evolutionary tree. the question is if they were so different, they could not interbreed with humans. breeding within their small population, they may have degenerated due to inbreeding. That would explain buried children- they were either low or not viable." How did you miss this Vril?! DO I NEED TO REPEAT MYSELF! I mean just look at the size of their skull. unless you have some information on these that I don't I see no reason to ASSUME that they are of a Neanderthals.
>I have assumed that Neanderthals and humans spent some time together and some managed to survive quite a while, they seem to have been smarter than us, so humans tried to emulate their appearance.
I not sure the long skull being are Neanderthals.
"Whatever the sample labeled 3A has came from - it had mtDNA with mutation unknown in any human, primate or animal known so far. The data are very sketchy though and a LOT of sequencing still needs to be done to recover the complete mtDNA sequence. but a few fragments I was able to sequence from this sample 3A indicate that if these mutation will hold we are dealing with a new human-like creature, very distant from homo sapiens, Neanderthals and Denisovans.. I am not sure it will even fit into the known Evolutionary tree. the question is if they were so different, they could not interbreed with humans. breeding within their small population, they may have degenerated due to inbreeding. That would explain buried children- they were either low or not viable." How did you miss this Vril?! DO I NEED TO REPEAT MYSELF! I mean just look at the size of their skull. unless you have some information on these that I don't I see no reason to ASSUME that they are of a Neanderthals.
1515213907.jpg (14.4 KB, 300x300, wizard-oz-scarecrow-gun_300x300.jpg)
>>41526
>So I don't know why you are asking me straw man questions.
Well this straw man gots a brain. Answer the questions.
The recent shenanigans CNN published about alleged UFO sighting is their desperate attempts to avert the public eyes from
relevant deep state disclosures.
>So I don't know why you are asking me straw man questions.
Well this straw man gots a brain. Answer the questions.
The recent shenanigans CNN published about alleged UFO sighting is their desperate attempts to avert the public eyes from
relevant deep state disclosures.
Tis all. It doesn't mean they fabricated the UFO phenomenon and dressed up in alien going around spooking folk, tho' I wouldn't say that they wouldn't. Though that video is a total fake methinks.
Actually I need not look further than my thread. Oh you're clever Vril but your quibbles shan't save you. you have failed to heed my links, videos and even part of my scrips. I guess I need open them of you lest your cognitive dissonance.
Here a video from said link: http://www.starchildproject.com/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=199&v=_vz0-1xZr_U
But that not all folks...
Here a video from said link: http://www.starchildproject.com/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=199&v=_vz0-1xZr_U
But that not all folks...
Fro you guessed it:
http://www.starchildproject.com/is-the-starchild-alien
The following posts are from this link.
Anent Image: "Alien" Bone? Bone that is super thin, super light, super strong... But is it superhuman?
http://www.starchildproject.com/is-the-starchild-alien
The following posts are from this link.
Anent Image: "Alien" Bone? Bone that is super thin, super light, super strong... But is it superhuman?
You've convinced me that history has weird things in it. Something I already knew. But obviously these things come from congress with the Devil. The evidence is plane to see!
1515228224_1.jpg (47.6 KB, 800x437, 800px-sapiens_neanderthal_comparison.jpg)
1515228224_5.jpg (18.7 KB, 316x299, 20120211-Tutankhamun cairo museum.jpg)
Sapiens vs Neanderthals, pic #1. Notice the elongated head and the bun. What you will find is many human decorations, modifications and figurines emphasise these features. Notice the strong eye ridges, you will see these emphasised as well.
45K years ago : Sapiens arrive in Europe
40K ya : Neanderthals exstinct
They had 5000 years together. Pic #2 is from this time period. The Lion Man, to me, is a depictions of a Neanderthal. Think of carvings as being like cartoon caricature.
There are other carvings but they are of women primitive porn! so I will leave them out.
12K ya : pic #3 again emphasising long head and the Neanderthal bun. The hanging part is probably a pony tail to emphasis "wise Neanderthal". But neanderthals have been extinct for ~30K years.
From this onwards figurines continue the long head theme up to civilization starting at about 5K ya. Pic #4-5.
I propose that humans have been elongating skulls one way or another for 40,000 years to seem wise and to fool ordinary citizens. Typical.
So now a question about pre birth long skulls. Would primitives cut a woman open and try to elongate the skull of a baby in the womb? Bearing in mind they quite happily cut out beating hearts to appease gods.
---
Odd DNA is still interesting, but you'll need to show me the alien father and his home planet, to have me concede it was aliens. I have no objections to human evolution being significantly more weird than science says.
[Read more] 45K years ago : Sapiens arrive in Europe
40K ya : Neanderthals exstinct
They had 5000 years together. Pic #2 is from this time period. The Lion Man, to me, is a depictions of a Neanderthal. Think of carvings as being like cartoon caricature.
There are other carvings but they are of women primitive porn! so I will leave them out.
12K ya : pic #3 again emphasising long head and the Neanderthal bun. The hanging part is probably a pony tail to emphasis "wise Neanderthal". But neanderthals have been extinct for ~30K years.
From this onwards figurines continue the long head theme up to civilization starting at about 5K ya. Pic #4-5.
I propose that humans have been elongating skulls one way or another for 40,000 years to seem wise and to fool ordinary citizens. Typical.
So now a question about pre birth long skulls. Would primitives cut a woman open and try to elongate the skull of a baby in the womb? Bearing in mind they quite happily cut out beating hearts to appease gods.
---
Odd DNA is still interesting, but you'll need to show me the alien father and his home planet, to have me concede it was aliens. I have no objections to human evolution being significantly more weird than science says.
>>42068
>The evidence is plane to see!
No it isn't.
All you have shown is ancient stone figures.
Nice quibble virbble better luck next time.
>The evidence is plane to see!
No it isn't.
All you have shown is ancient stone figures.
Nice quibble virbble better luck next time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pe3rceR5JMk
William Tompkins previously unaffiliated with Corey good give us basically the same information as Corey Goode. Affirming Goode's information. William Tompkins has recently passed away. Press F to express homage. I am an advocate of logic, Logic dictates my conclusions. If you were really interested in the truth, that is factuality you wouldn't dismiss my resources in the matter at hand. Naught can be verified until witnessed for one's self, however we can ascertain how likely it is for the information to be true by separate unaffiliated sources what relate their information.
William Tompkins previously unaffiliated with Corey good give us basically the same information as Corey Goode. Affirming Goode's information. William Tompkins has recently passed away. Press F to express homage. I am an advocate of logic, Logic dictates my conclusions. If you were really interested in the truth, that is factuality you wouldn't dismiss my resources in the matter at hand. Naught can be verified until witnessed for one's self, however we can ascertain how likely it is for the information to be true by separate unaffiliated sources what relate their information.
1515267729.png (93.4 KB, 883x905, mother_of_god_in_hd_by_lemmino-d64ndao.png)
>>42197
I used to be where you are now. Then I timelined the UFO/alien phenomena. Then I added into that human technology timeline. They correlated. That's why I can't be impressed, like you, anymore by this hype. I am immune.
>Naught can be verified until witnessed for one's self, however we can ascertain how likely it is for the information to be true by separate unaffiliated sources what relate their information.
God is real then, and he split that rock. Solved.
I used to be where you are now. Then I timelined the UFO/alien phenomena. Then I added into that human technology timeline. They correlated. That's why I can't be impressed, like you, anymore by this hype. I am immune.
>Naught can be verified until witnessed for one's self, however we can ascertain how likely it is for the information to be true by separate unaffiliated sources what relate their information.
God is real then, and he split that rock. Solved.
>>42205
>God is real then, and he split that rock. Solved.
I don't understand Vril how did you come to that conclusion God's principle is of non-interference. "God" Creator is real and I can prove it through simple logic. Correct me if I'm wrong.
If I do nothing, nothing will happen
Therefore if there wasn't a Creator there would be no creation.
>I used to be where you are now. Then I timelined the UFO/alien phenomena. Then I added into that human technology timeline. They correlated. That's why I can't be impressed, like you, anymore by this hype. I am immune.
You forgot to put vimana in your timeline, tell me how many lores & myths of the various cultures do you know of?
Your replies aren't very logical. that hurts your credibility.
You're still quibbling, that also hurts you as it shews that I have a strong argument which you thus far have failed to defeat, and so you evade the point, this thread was made to counter yours which I see as disinformation and to get people to question, are we alone here?
Answer me this how would you explain Niara Isley account? How is there correlation between what she say and what Corey Goode says when they haven't met? Note: Niara had to get her memory back through hypnosis. If you quibble / avoid the questions my argument still stands until proven otherwise. If you don't answer at all my argument still stands.
[Read more] >God is real then, and he split that rock. Solved.
I don't understand Vril how did you come to that conclusion God's principle is of non-interference. "God" Creator is real and I can prove it through simple logic. Correct me if I'm wrong.
If I do nothing, nothing will happen
Therefore if there wasn't a Creator there would be no creation.
>I used to be where you are now. Then I timelined the UFO/alien phenomena. Then I added into that human technology timeline. They correlated. That's why I can't be impressed, like you, anymore by this hype. I am immune.
You forgot to put vimana in your timeline, tell me how many lores & myths of the various cultures do you know of?
Your replies aren't very logical. that hurts your credibility.
You're still quibbling, that also hurts you as it shews that I have a strong argument which you thus far have failed to defeat, and so you evade the point, this thread was made to counter yours which I see as disinformation and to get people to question, are we alone here?
Answer me this how would you explain Niara Isley account? How is there correlation between what she say and what Corey Goode says when they haven't met? Note: Niara had to get her memory back through hypnosis. If you quibble / avoid the questions my argument still stands until proven otherwise. If you don't answer at all my argument still stands.
Aliens have never been too interesting to me because most of them are a LARP, but I have these.
>>42361
An even better argument is that you cannot explain how the laws of physics existed without a creator. Gravity had to exist before the universe could create itself.
An even better argument is that you cannot explain how the laws of physics existed without a creator. Gravity had to exist before the universe could create itself.
>>42361
>I don't understand Vril how did you come to that conclusion
It was sarcasm. A mystery does not prove [insert favourite belief system] is true.
>You forgot to put vimana in your timeline,
How do you tell the difference between a fictional story and a factual story? Will a superman comic seem like a historical person in a few thousand year? Mind you the helix and mercury is interesting. Mercury was the first superconductor and rotating it would be part of what I expect for artificial gravity. But how did it get cooled to superconductivity temperatures? Also physics works the same for humans and aliens, so why can only aliens be it's operator, assuming it was not fiction? Why not Atlantians or Lemurians?
After you show me the Vimana, then point to the alien. After some tests, I'll be convinced.
I don't trust Corey Good. He himself might be being honest or not. If he is being honest then we still have the MKULTRA style mind control programming that has possibly been done on him. Here is an example of that attch #1.
And I can point to a human, you can't point to an alien. My claim is more solid.
Gorey Goode has met Ra up on the moon. Here is RA, a 1980s channelled being: https://www.lawofone.info/ who is now a 2010s space alien. Curious.
>Niara Isley
>hypnosis
Alarm bells. Hypnosis can make and recover memories.
Both these accounts are on shaky ground. Since I am asserting there is a conspiracy (using hypnosis, props and technology) to make alien memories then these two people could have had memories introduced from a common third party, leading to similarities.
And I can prove MKULTRA existed. Again you can't prove aliens.
You: something weird happened = aliens
Me: something weird happened = mystery, with a bias to what I can prove = humans love to fuck each other over.
I realise the thrill of aliens evokes many interesting possibilities. After 1-2 decades the thrill factor will wear off unless they actually do the hoax well.
Have you read 1950s alien abduction books?
[Read more] >I don't understand Vril how did you come to that conclusion
It was sarcasm. A mystery does not prove [insert favourite belief system] is true.
>You forgot to put vimana in your timeline,
How do you tell the difference between a fictional story and a factual story? Will a superman comic seem like a historical person in a few thousand year? Mind you the helix and mercury is interesting. Mercury was the first superconductor and rotating it would be part of what I expect for artificial gravity. But how did it get cooled to superconductivity temperatures? Also physics works the same for humans and aliens, so why can only aliens be it's operator, assuming it was not fiction? Why not Atlantians or Lemurians?
After you show me the Vimana, then point to the alien. After some tests, I'll be convinced.
I don't trust Corey Good. He himself might be being honest or not. If he is being honest then we still have the MKULTRA style mind control programming that has possibly been done on him. Here is an example of that attch #1.
And I can point to a human, you can't point to an alien. My claim is more solid.
Gorey Goode has met Ra up on the moon. Here is RA, a 1980s channelled being: https://www.lawofone.info/ who is now a 2010s space alien. Curious.
>Niara Isley
>hypnosis
Alarm bells. Hypnosis can make and recover memories.
Both these accounts are on shaky ground. Since I am asserting there is a conspiracy (using hypnosis, props and technology) to make alien memories then these two people could have had memories introduced from a common third party, leading to similarities.
And I can prove MKULTRA existed. Again you can't prove aliens.
You: something weird happened = aliens
Me: something weird happened = mystery, with a bias to what I can prove = humans love to fuck each other over.
I realise the thrill of aliens evokes many interesting possibilities. After 1-2 decades the thrill factor will wear off unless they actually do the hoax well.
Have you read 1950s alien abduction books?
>>42454
>>42455
I have a copy of the original publication (1992) those come from. There is also updated version online. https://archive.org/details/DasVrilProjekt
Want to see the alleged report of the first version of the Nazi "Round Flight Tool"? pic #1 & 2 ... now I suppose you want that translated :)
Badly google translated:
RFZ 1 and RFZ 2
What to say about the RFZ, that is "Round Flight Tool" which is built from the site of the company Arado in the summer of the year 35, this one must first be seen from
the RFZ I from which had already been built before and as such showed itself as a failure, if one wants to see it as an airplane, Exactly, was not.
The RFZ I was already made in June 34. It was an attempt to get the SM drive train flying. The only flying experiment, RFZ I, got about 60 m high, danced in the air for
almost five minutes and was then able to land again.
The pilot, Lothar Weiz, was able to jump out before the equipment in the bazaar became more and more powerful like a gyro, thereby breaking the end of RFZ I.
On the other hand, RFZ II was a real flying machine, which one would actually call the first flying aircraft, at least as far as I know of such an RFZ II had an improve
d SM-Lev engine and impulse control. There was no longer a tailplane of a conventional kind. RFZ II also had a landing device, which could only be exited once. It was n
ecessary to get it on the ground, which only went down from below, and "tension" it.
For the landing, it could then be left out. The starter "prone" from a wooden frame. The three legs of the landing gear looked like tall stilts, which were necessary, a
s the control had not yet allowed a precise landing and therefore also had to be suitable for uneven terrain. Very unpleasant was the pulpit, which was later converted
to a pressurised cabin. Since the SM-engine took up the entire space of the disk body, the turret/cockpit had to be placed on top. The pilot certainly had a kneeling at
titude.
The flight performance of RFZ II was very impressive until the control, which allowed only sudden direction changes of 22.5° each.
The reliability of this aircraft was remarkable.
Weighed the problematic control and also probably for other reasons, RFZ II was mothballed to the end of 40. Then the device was revived. Two 2 cm outboard machine guns
were installed in panels.
Although RFZ II has remained a single item, it has been used for long-distance reconnaissance flights and has been very well received.
----
Pic #3 is a time line of modern events leading to the Nazi UFO images online. I found no obvious flaws in the narrative.
[Read more] >>42455
I have a copy of the original publication (1992) those come from. There is also updated version online. https://archive.org/details/DasVrilProjekt
Want to see the alleged report of the first version of the Nazi "Round Flight Tool"? pic #1 & 2 ... now I suppose you want that translated :)
Badly google translated:
RFZ 1 and RFZ 2
What to say about the RFZ, that is "Round Flight Tool" which is built from the site of the company Arado in the summer of the year 35, this one must first be seen from
the RFZ I from which had already been built before and as such showed itself as a failure, if one wants to see it as an airplane, Exactly, was not.
The RFZ I was already made in June 34. It was an attempt to get the SM drive train flying. The only flying experiment, RFZ I, got about 60 m high, danced in the air for
almost five minutes and was then able to land again.
The pilot, Lothar Weiz, was able to jump out before the equipment in the bazaar became more and more powerful like a gyro, thereby breaking the end of RFZ I.
On the other hand, RFZ II was a real flying machine, which one would actually call the first flying aircraft, at least as far as I know of such an RFZ II had an improve
d SM-Lev engine and impulse control. There was no longer a tailplane of a conventional kind. RFZ II also had a landing device, which could only be exited once. It was n
ecessary to get it on the ground, which only went down from below, and "tension" it.
For the landing, it could then be left out. The starter "prone" from a wooden frame. The three legs of the landing gear looked like tall stilts, which were necessary, a
s the control had not yet allowed a precise landing and therefore also had to be suitable for uneven terrain. Very unpleasant was the pulpit, which was later converted
to a pressurised cabin. Since the SM-engine took up the entire space of the disk body, the turret/cockpit had to be placed on top. The pilot certainly had a kneeling at
titude.
The flight performance of RFZ II was very impressive until the control, which allowed only sudden direction changes of 22.5° each.
The reliability of this aircraft was remarkable.
Weighed the problematic control and also probably for other reasons, RFZ II was mothballed to the end of 40. Then the device was revived. Two 2 cm outboard machine guns
were installed in panels.
Although RFZ II has remained a single item, it has been used for long-distance reconnaissance flights and has been very well received.
----
Pic #3 is a time line of modern events leading to the Nazi UFO images online. I found no obvious flaws in the narrative.
>>42458
>After you show me the Vimana, then point to the alien. After some tests, I'll be convinced.
Picture I know I'm cheeky also Starchild skull still the best evidence.
I'll read you paper clip later.
> I'll be convinced.
I'm not trying to convince you, I'm just putting up an counter argument the problem is that you have dismissed my thread and are acting all elitist.
>I don't trust Corey Good.
I simply catalog. The truth is out there one actually need leave his computer and find it.
>If he is being honest then we still have the MKULTRA style mind control programming that has possibly been done on him.
he talk about that. It has been done on him only in the opposite way from what you proposed. They erased his memory which he calls blank slating and then they added false memories so that it is like it never happened. You haven't invested that much into figuring Cosmic Disclosure out have you just like you did with me. We are all under one sort of mind control or another.
Why do you think the world is such a mess?
>And I can point to a human, you can't point to an alien. My claim is more solid.
What's this That you didn't even consider looking into (The Starchild skull). I mean one can't be 100% sure, but one could be 20% cooler if he would acknowledge the fact that it is pretty compelling evidence is it not?
>Gorey Goode has met Ra up on the moon. Here is RA...
I am yet to see a problem here.
>Alarm bells. Hypnosis can make and recover memories.
Not sure it was hypnosis exactly as I watched this a while ago. Did you watch the video?
>And I can prove MKULTRA existed
I know it exists. I believe you the mind control thing OK, got it, understand.
>Again you can't prove aliens.
Again again STARCHILD SKULL ITS STILL THE BLOODY ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM!
>You: something weird happened = aliens
oh fECK h0w could i've be wrong about myself.
>I realise the thrill of aliens evokes many interesting possibilities. After 1-2 decades the thrill factor will wear off unless they actually do the hoax well.
Sometimes one must ask himself am I a block head?
is my house a box? Do I think inside or out side of the proverbial box?
>Have you read 1950s alien abduction books?
I no have read book. But I check ok.
Now with all that being said, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, suppose you're right, what then? What danger am I in if I'm wrong?
[Read more] >After you show me the Vimana, then point to the alien. After some tests, I'll be convinced.
Picture I know I'm cheeky also Starchild skull still the best evidence.
I'll read you paper clip later.
> I'll be convinced.
I'm not trying to convince you, I'm just putting up an counter argument the problem is that you have dismissed my thread and are acting all elitist.
>I don't trust Corey Good.
I simply catalog. The truth is out there one actually need leave his computer and find it.
>If he is being honest then we still have the MKULTRA style mind control programming that has possibly been done on him.
he talk about that. It has been done on him only in the opposite way from what you proposed. They erased his memory which he calls blank slating and then they added false memories so that it is like it never happened. You haven't invested that much into figuring Cosmic Disclosure out have you just like you did with me. We are all under one sort of mind control or another.
Why do you think the world is such a mess?
>And I can point to a human, you can't point to an alien. My claim is more solid.
What's this That you didn't even consider looking into (The Starchild skull). I mean one can't be 100% sure, but one could be 20% cooler if he would acknowledge the fact that it is pretty compelling evidence is it not?
>Gorey Goode has met Ra up on the moon. Here is RA...
I am yet to see a problem here.
>Alarm bells. Hypnosis can make and recover memories.
Not sure it was hypnosis exactly as I watched this a while ago. Did you watch the video?
>And I can prove MKULTRA existed
I know it exists. I believe you the mind control thing OK, got it, understand.
>Again you can't prove aliens.
Again again STARCHILD SKULL ITS STILL THE BLOODY ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM!
>You: something weird happened = aliens
oh fECK h0w could i've be wrong about myself.
>I realise the thrill of aliens evokes many interesting possibilities. After 1-2 decades the thrill factor will wear off unless they actually do the hoax well.
Sometimes one must ask himself am I a block head?
is my house a box? Do I think inside or out side of the proverbial box?
>Have you read 1950s alien abduction books?
I no have read book. But I check ok.
Now with all that being said, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, suppose you're right, what then? What danger am I in if I'm wrong?
>>42455
>An even better argument is that you cannot explain how the laws of physics existed without a creator.
who said they did? picture this your at the beginning of creation all is naught, you are in limbo. How can you judge whether physics exist or not if there is literally nothing to judge them by.
>Gravity had to exist before the universe could create itself.
Why? I'm not a scientist so I don't know.
The universe could create Itself wouldn't that imply that the universe is God?
if not it is akin to a blank canvas painting its self a picture.
>An even better argument is that you cannot explain how the laws of physics existed without a creator.
who said they did? picture this your at the beginning of creation all is naught, you are in limbo. How can you judge whether physics exist or not if there is literally nothing to judge them by.
>Gravity had to exist before the universe could create itself.
Why? I'm not a scientist so I don't know.
The universe could create Itself wouldn't that imply that the universe is God?
if not it is akin to a blank canvas painting its self a picture.
1515367695_1.jpg (103.0 KB, 780x629, e83bf6d4-f2df-11e6-9ce0-1a2a36b72f23-780x629.jpg)
>>41383
>How do you tell the difference between a fictional story and a factual story?
Does myth and legend lie?
https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/science/a-giant-ground-sloth-was-found-at-sea-tac-airport-56-years-ago/
>Will a superman comic seem like a historical person in a few thousand year?
I doubt it we don't hold super hero comics with the importance that the Indians did to their historical works such as the Bhagavad Gita.
>How do you tell the difference between a fictional story and a factual story?
Does myth and legend lie?
https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/science/a-giant-ground-sloth-was-found-at-sea-tac-airport-56-years-ago/
>Will a superman comic seem like a historical person in a few thousand year?
I doubt it we don't hold super hero comics with the importance that the Indians did to their historical works such as the Bhagavad Gita.
>>42511
The Paracas skulls were formed in the same manner that tribal mothers across the world, most notable being several US native tribes, have done. Compression, binding, fixation, skull kneading/rolling, are used to create such shapes. As you yourself stated, the Paracas skulls show large deviations from each other. Logically, this indicates those same techniques were not used equally on all subjected children. However, abnormal genetic mutations cause roughly 6,000 children each year to be born with enlarged, exaggerated, or flat out strange skull formations. ONE random skull of a distinct genetic aberrant with overall human characteristics from whom knows how many millennia back does not prove the existence of ayyliens. On the contrary, the universe is wide, vast, and strange. It is, most importantly, dead. Of suspicious note here is that the so called "starchild skull" is used as proof-of-claim for an offshoot of the catholic cult called, wait for, it, "The Starchildren", a neo-cult which claims that skull "proves angels exist". Even more curious, "The Starchildren" cult was created shortly after Project MKULTA began. Were there hundreds of such examples rather than a single cherry picked anomaly, then you may be on to something. This is a single mutation, like the hundreds of thousands of others in history, that has zero fantastic verification.
The Paracas skulls were formed in the same manner that tribal mothers across the world, most notable being several US native tribes, have done. Compression, binding, fixation, skull kneading/rolling, are used to create such shapes. As you yourself stated, the Paracas skulls show large deviations from each other. Logically, this indicates those same techniques were not used equally on all subjected children. However, abnormal genetic mutations cause roughly 6,000 children each year to be born with enlarged, exaggerated, or flat out strange skull formations. ONE random skull of a distinct genetic aberrant with overall human characteristics from whom knows how many millennia back does not prove the existence of ayyliens. On the contrary, the universe is wide, vast, and strange. It is, most importantly, dead. Of suspicious note here is that the so called "starchild skull" is used as proof-of-claim for an offshoot of the catholic cult called, wait for, it, "The Starchildren", a neo-cult which claims that skull "proves angels exist". Even more curious, "The Starchildren" cult was created shortly after Project MKULTA began. Were there hundreds of such examples rather than a single cherry picked anomaly, then you may be on to something. This is a single mutation, like the hundreds of thousands of others in history, that has zero fantastic verification.
>>42458
>The CIA has engaged in concocted UFO (flying saucer) events since 1955 with a program called OPERATION MIRAGE.
>REAL UFO events have occurred but hundreds of UFO episodes(worldwide) have been simulated by the CIA using experimental technologies, mid altering drugs, and psychological inducements.
I never refuted that government agencies such as the CIA don't have the ability to fake UFO's & have not faked UFO's sightings and the sort. Notice tho' Real UFO events have occurred... It states.
but what does this have to do with the 900 year old Starchild skull or the long skulls which are 3000 year old or the Atacama humanoid whom no one durst figure yet. I know how vigilant we must be, everything is against us. Including other human beings.
Making displays of holographic UFOs shouldn't be that hard. Methinks, it is possible.
>The CIA has engaged in concocted UFO (flying saucer) events since 1955 with a program called OPERATION MIRAGE.
>REAL UFO events have occurred but hundreds of UFO episodes(worldwide) have been simulated by the CIA using experimental technologies, mid altering drugs, and psychological inducements.
I never refuted that government agencies such as the CIA don't have the ability to fake UFO's & have not faked UFO's sightings and the sort. Notice tho' Real UFO events have occurred... It states.
but what does this have to do with the 900 year old Starchild skull or the long skulls which are 3000 year old or the Atacama humanoid whom no one durst figure yet. I know how vigilant we must be, everything is against us. Including other human beings.
Making displays of holographic UFOs shouldn't be that hard. Methinks, it is possible.
>>43178
>The Paracas skulls were formed in the same manner that tribal mothers across the world, most notable being several US native tribes, have done.
O really so why is it that a Pracas skull
measured up to 25% lager cranial volume and is 60% heavier than a normal human skull? No amount of headbinding will increase the cranial capacity. This was stated in one of the videos. So far most of the comments I've been getting are quibbles & ignoramus comments.
>skull kneading/rolling
LOL!!! Just imagine a mother rolling/kneading her child's skull like a pizza dough mamma mia into an elongated shape.
>As you yourself stated, the Paracas skulls show large deviations from each other. Logically, this indicates those same techniques were not used equally on all subjected children.
Ueeh listen "doc" Explain to me why the skulls have red hair see pic, in contrast to the native south Americans we see today (I literally wrote of this)?
I sense some major cognitive dissonance.
> abnormal genetic mutations cause roughly 6,000 children each year to be born with enlarged, exaggerated, or flat out strange skull formations.
Listen (("Doc")) Major mutation are fatal meaning that the starchild wouldn't be able to survive to adulthood. That right its a misnomer. Please I beg of you read and watch through everything at least in the thread starter.
>It is, most importantly, dead.
Pray tell how do you know?
>Of suspicious note here is that the so called "starchild skull" is used as proof-of-claim for an offshoot of the catholic cult called, wait for, it, "The Starchildren"...
More equivocating? Vril anon has been doing the same. I wont bother any more with quibbles.
>MKULTA
I'm Not entirely sure how it works care to explain? Now I could go into more reasons as to why I think its not a normal human skull but have better things to do. Anyways you gots smarts, use critical thinking.
I mean I could be wrong, you just need to do a better job to disprove me.
[Read more] >The Paracas skulls were formed in the same manner that tribal mothers across the world, most notable being several US native tribes, have done.
O really so why is it that a Pracas skull
measured up to 25% lager cranial volume and is 60% heavier than a normal human skull? No amount of headbinding will increase the cranial capacity. This was stated in one of the videos. So far most of the comments I've been getting are quibbles & ignoramus comments.
>skull kneading/rolling
LOL!!! Just imagine a mother rolling/kneading her child's skull like a pizza dough mamma mia into an elongated shape.
>As you yourself stated, the Paracas skulls show large deviations from each other. Logically, this indicates those same techniques were not used equally on all subjected children.
Ueeh listen "doc" Explain to me why the skulls have red hair see pic, in contrast to the native south Americans we see today (I literally wrote of this)?
I sense some major cognitive dissonance.
> abnormal genetic mutations cause roughly 6,000 children each year to be born with enlarged, exaggerated, or flat out strange skull formations.
Listen (("Doc")) Major mutation are fatal meaning that the starchild wouldn't be able to survive to adulthood. That right its a misnomer. Please I beg of you read and watch through everything at least in the thread starter.
>It is, most importantly, dead.
Pray tell how do you know?
>Of suspicious note here is that the so called "starchild skull" is used as proof-of-claim for an offshoot of the catholic cult called, wait for, it, "The Starchildren"...
More equivocating? Vril anon has been doing the same. I wont bother any more with quibbles.
>MKULTA
I'm Not entirely sure how it works care to explain? Now I could go into more reasons as to why I think its not a normal human skull but have better things to do. Anyways you gots smarts, use critical thinking.
I mean I could be wrong, you just need to do a better job to disprove me.
>>43992
The picture to your right is an elongated skull, the one to your left is what I believe to be a naturally long skull.
The picture to your right is an elongated skull, the one to your left is what I believe to be a naturally long skull.
>>43992
This is one of the more retarded posts I have read here. You have not researched what "cranial capacity" even means. "THERE'S EXTRA SPACE SO THAT MEANS THE BRAIN IS BIGGER!" That is not how biology works. You made a bullshit strawman extrapolation with no scientific validation or reasoning behind the claim. Not all major mutations are fatal, didn't even do your own research on that one. Now, for your information, here's a partial list of the known peoples that performed cranial deformation: the Aborigines of Australia, Allemanics, Burgundians, Chinook, Choctaw, Gepids, Heruli, Huns, Incans, Lucayans, Macrocephali, Mayans, Ostrogoths, Salishan, Toulousian French, some Saxon tribes, Nazcans, Rugil, and the Vanuatuans. This was a fairly wide spread occurrence across the world.
tl;dr: you're a fucking shill trying to push "BUT IT'S AYYYLIENS GOY, JUST BELIEVE ME AND MY SUPERIOR UTTERLY VALID OPINION!"
This is one of the more retarded posts I have read here. You have not researched what "cranial capacity" even means. "THERE'S EXTRA SPACE SO THAT MEANS THE BRAIN IS BIGGER!" That is not how biology works. You made a bullshit strawman extrapolation with no scientific validation or reasoning behind the claim. Not all major mutations are fatal, didn't even do your own research on that one. Now, for your information, here's a partial list of the known peoples that performed cranial deformation: the Aborigines of Australia, Allemanics, Burgundians, Chinook, Choctaw, Gepids, Heruli, Huns, Incans, Lucayans, Macrocephali, Mayans, Ostrogoths, Salishan, Toulousian French, some Saxon tribes, Nazcans, Rugil, and the Vanuatuans. This was a fairly wide spread occurrence across the world.
tl;dr: you're a fucking shill trying to push "BUT IT'S AYYYLIENS GOY, JUST BELIEVE ME AND MY SUPERIOR UTTERLY VALID OPINION!"
>>44302
> You have not researched what "cranial capacity" even means. "THERE'S EXTRA SPACE SO THAT MEANS THE BRAIN IS BIGGER!"
That's exactly what I meant.
> Now, for your information, here's a partial list of the known peoples that performed cranial deformation: the Aborigines of Australia,...
What of it? They were probably mimicking beings that had long skull, why don't you ask them?
>tl;dr: you're a fucking shill trying to push "BUT IT'S AYYYLIENS GOY, JUST BELIEVE ME AND MY SUPERIOR UTTERLY VALID OPINION!"
I'm a shill for talking anent curious archaeological discovers and speculating on whether of not it might be space alien.
Your wording is Maladroit,
Is that all you got, so much for disproving me.
"Opinions" more like observations.
Where are your manners?
[Read more] > You have not researched what "cranial capacity" even means. "THERE'S EXTRA SPACE SO THAT MEANS THE BRAIN IS BIGGER!"
That's exactly what I meant.
> Now, for your information, here's a partial list of the known peoples that performed cranial deformation: the Aborigines of Australia,...
What of it? They were probably mimicking beings that had long skull, why don't you ask them?
>tl;dr: you're a fucking shill trying to push "BUT IT'S AYYYLIENS GOY, JUST BELIEVE ME AND MY SUPERIOR UTTERLY VALID OPINION!"
I'm a shill for talking anent curious archaeological discovers and speculating on whether of not it might be space alien.
Your wording is Maladroit,
Is that all you got, so much for disproving me.
"Opinions" more like observations.
Where are your manners?
I have defended my argument well no one yet has proven me wrong. I think it is safe to say that I have won this argument(it has grown silent hither). Only two people durst write to me on this subject they quibbled a lot! One in particular Vribble (Vril Anon.). Wherefore is everyone else so indifferent?
>>47862
>(((anon))) thinks he's won an argument about (((AYYYYLIENS))) by strawman extrapolations
>confirms himself "winner" because everyone else has avoided getting involved in the shitshow
>doesn't research cranial capacity
>fails to show logical conclusions
>fails to give proper argument other than ((("IT'S ALIENS GOYIM, JUST BELIEVE ME")))
No one cares about your pro-ShareBlue/CAP/CIA/Mossad shilling thread. Most users have been around long enough to spot bullshit. Mods, delete this thread, it's taking up valuable space on this board.
>(((anon))) thinks he's won an argument about (((AYYYYLIENS))) by strawman extrapolations
>confirms himself "winner" because everyone else has avoided getting involved in the shitshow
>doesn't research cranial capacity
>fails to show logical conclusions
>fails to give proper argument other than ((("IT'S ALIENS GOYIM, JUST BELIEVE ME")))
No one cares about your pro-ShareBlue/CAP/CIA/Mossad shilling thread. Most users have been around long enough to spot bullshit. Mods, delete this thread, it's taking up valuable space on this board.
1516411684_2.png (508.9 KB, 512x432, PMC3745117_IJPS-46-18-g015.png)
>>47862
>>47875
Figures 1 & 2 here are all naturally occurring deformities commonally referred to as craniosynostosis. All recorded examples today would serve to be unrelated to aliens at all, but as developmental deformities that usually happens when two parts of the skull improperly conjoin. There are supposedly no studies indicating a correlation between cranial capacity and intelligence, however there are studies linking brain grey matter size and intelligence (which would be a nonfactor here.)
On skull kneading, there are a number of theories for it like social ones. Whether or not to please or imitate aliens, that would have to fall on the person suggesting it to prove it, and not who is trying to disprove it. Otherwise it is pontification.
>>47875
Figures 1 & 2 here are all naturally occurring deformities commonally referred to as craniosynostosis. All recorded examples today would serve to be unrelated to aliens at all, but as developmental deformities that usually happens when two parts of the skull improperly conjoin. There are supposedly no studies indicating a correlation between cranial capacity and intelligence, however there are studies linking brain grey matter size and intelligence (which would be a nonfactor here.)
On skull kneading, there are a number of theories for it like social ones. Whether or not to please or imitate aliens, that would have to fall on the person suggesting it to prove it, and not who is trying to disprove it. Otherwise it is pontification.
1516417254.jpg (362.2 KB, 1024x1418, the_scarecrow_by_lolliangel123-d8gjumr.jpg)
>>47875
That's right let the cognitive dissonance flow through you.
>No one cares about your pro-ShareBlue/CAP/CIA/Mossad shilling thread.
Its easy to believe the status quo ain't it. That why, that is there religion and it is yours too to an extent, varying bloke to bloke.
>doesn't research cranial capacity
O forgive me I assume that when their was a brain in there that it filed up the whole skull you know that extra 25%. according to Marriam-Webster crainal capacity is: the cubic capacity of the braincase estimated for the living by a formula based on head measurements and determined for the skull by filling the cranial cavity with particulate material (as mustard seed or small shot) and measuring the volume of the latter.
Which is pretty much what I thought it mean. I just don't know what went wrong?
NO REally what went wrong, what's wrong here what is your point explain yourself?
I better heed your pictures 'cause that's what your doing to me.
>fails to show logical conclusions
the conclusion is meh what about the video about the starchild skull. What not logical enough for a wiz scientist like yourself. You know kids science is a religion too. marked by Hyper skepticism and the sorts.
You know your not very nice are you sure you watched MLP:FiM?
>fails to give proper argument other than
So what is the star child skull we know it not a human it has to may... you know what enjoy you slumber. Also what is it with you and strawmen I don't fallow. Is it a fetish :-]?
>confirms himself "winner" because everyone else has avoided getting involved in the shitshow
Hay its not my fault their all Coward, it is of my understanding that quibbling & subterfuge are use when one can't prove someone wrong, I have seen on the the main board that when someone gets something wrong everyone points it out and make it obvious that their wrong. Mine is not the case. LOok I can be mean too,ACawhahaha you thought I would stoop to you level knave.
[Read more] That's right let the cognitive dissonance flow through you.
>No one cares about your pro-ShareBlue/CAP/CIA/Mossad shilling thread.
Its easy to believe the status quo ain't it. That why, that is there religion and it is yours too to an extent, varying bloke to bloke.
>doesn't research cranial capacity
O forgive me I assume that when their was a brain in there that it filed up the whole skull you know that extra 25%. according to Marriam-Webster crainal capacity is: the cubic capacity of the braincase estimated for the living by a formula based on head measurements and determined for the skull by filling the cranial cavity with particulate material (as mustard seed or small shot) and measuring the volume of the latter.
Which is pretty much what I thought it mean. I just don't know what went wrong?
NO REally what went wrong, what's wrong here what is your point explain yourself?
I better heed your pictures 'cause that's what your doing to me.
>fails to show logical conclusions
the conclusion is meh what about the video about the starchild skull. What not logical enough for a wiz scientist like yourself. You know kids science is a religion too. marked by Hyper skepticism and the sorts.
You know your not very nice are you sure you watched MLP:FiM?
>fails to give proper argument other than
So what is the star child skull we know it not a human it has to may... you know what enjoy you slumber. Also what is it with you and strawmen I don't fallow. Is it a fetish :-]?
>confirms himself "winner" because everyone else has avoided getting involved in the shitshow
Hay its not my fault their all Coward, it is of my understanding that quibbling & subterfuge are use when one can't prove someone wrong, I have seen on the the main board that when someone gets something wrong everyone points it out and make it obvious that their wrong. Mine is not the case. LOok I can be mean too,ACawhahaha you thought I would stoop to you level knave.
1516419874.jpg (92.3 KB, 500x350, Elongated Paracas Skulls Red Hair Giants.jpg)
>>47906
>unrelated to aliens
Notice I said potential space aliens.
>There are supposedly no studies indicating a correlation between cranial capacity and intelligence, however there are studies linking brain grey matter size and intelligence (which would be a nonfactor here.)
Bigger criminal capacity means that the brain could be bigger makes scenes to me.
>that would have to fall on the person suggesting it to prove it, and not who is trying to disprove it.
Why? you lazy? Some tribal people who practice head-binding say that they are mimicking their ancestors. You didn't address the starchild skull (*check the thread starter*)
Nor the fact that some long skulls with hair still intact have red hair though it a dark red.
Do your own research if you're interested. Be sure to look about the thread.
I just made this thread to spread bread crumbs not to educate you, but to inform you.
Also the Paracas skulls do not suffer from craniosynostosis. I mean what are the odds for 300 skull to suffer from this. Sorry if the tone is mean I'm just losing my patients because people don't want to use their brains. I bid thee fare well.
[Read more] >unrelated to aliens
Notice I said potential space aliens.
>There are supposedly no studies indicating a correlation between cranial capacity and intelligence, however there are studies linking brain grey matter size and intelligence (which would be a nonfactor here.)
Bigger criminal capacity means that the brain could be bigger makes scenes to me.
>that would have to fall on the person suggesting it to prove it, and not who is trying to disprove it.
Why? you lazy? Some tribal people who practice head-binding say that they are mimicking their ancestors. You didn't address the starchild skull (*check the thread starter*)
Nor the fact that some long skulls with hair still intact have red hair though it a dark red.
Do your own research if you're interested. Be sure to look about the thread.
I just made this thread to spread bread crumbs not to educate you, but to inform you.
Also the Paracas skulls do not suffer from craniosynostosis. I mean what are the odds for 300 skull to suffer from this. Sorry if the tone is mean I'm just losing my patients because people don't want to use their brains. I bid thee fare well.
[Reply] [Last 50 Posts] [Last 100 Posts] [Last 200 Posts]
You are viewing older replies. Click [View All] or [Last n Posts] to vew latest posts.
Clicking update will load all posts posted after last post on this page.
Post pagination: [Prev] [1-50] [51-64] [Next] [Live (last 50 replies)]
64 replies | 79 files | 10 UUIDs | Page 32
[Add to Thread Watcher]