/vx/ - Videogames and Paranormal

Witness videos

[YouTube] UFO over North Carolina January 25th 2019 [Embed] "UFO over North Carolina January 25th 2019" (pic1)
https://youtu.be/p-U_5T4MQXE [Embed] "Strange lights in the sky in Yuma Arizona" [17 Sep 2019]
https://youtu.be/4UcacozXZ_Y [Embed] "Capture 7 Bright UFOs Sphere Appearing and Disappearing Mysteriously in the Texas Sky" [18 Jan 2020]

Historical

1952: https://youtu.be/0FVsUyTGVWQ [Embed] "UFO crash in Norway, did they retrieve the craft despite government denial?"
1976: [YouTube] Spanish Navy Files Disclose Underwater UFOs and ‘Thin, Swedish-Looking’ Beings [Embed] "Spanish Navy Files Disclose Underwater UFOs and ‘Thin, Swedish-Looking’ Beings"
1988: https://youtu.be/fDVwXVadUCE [Embed] http://www.ufoevidence.org/cases/case1090.htm (Knowles Family Encounter)

UFOpen for business: Britain’s Royal Air Force to declassify X-Files kept in secret for years
https://www.rt.com/uk/479267-raf-declassify-ufo-archives/

Bonus

https://youtu.be/sxGXaNmp2cE [Embed] Hairy creature filmed in a swamp. Big Foot?

MKUltra: https://youtu.be/w-SO51VnMOc [Embed]

[YouTube] Video Posted on TikTok by a Commercial Pilot: Medellín UFO? [Embed]
from https://www.tiktok.com/@cesarinmp/video/6785921462571126021

Examining the 1952/04-09 Wave from a solar metallic plasma perspective.

- 96% of UFO reports had characteristics consistent with solar (matallic) plasma in the atmosphere similar to the previous Flying Saucer/Disc waves in the table. (pic1)

- 259 (4%) had entities reported.
- 32 (0%) suggests the witness was compromised in some way.
- be interesting to examine in detail later.

Because this is a 6 month wave I have broken it into 2 parts, 3 months long:

Part 1/2: 1952/04-06

The old method of day-to-day correlations testing broke down under the continuous stream of solar storms and UFO flaps (pic2). Having so many storms and flaps guaranteed a hit.
This in itself is a correlation, but I want to push harder to see if day-to-day correlation can be shown via intensity of each storm and flap.
A new method was needed and a vertical histogram seemed like a good choice (pic3).

Pic3 shows:
- On the left:
- Geomagnetic Storms from 1938-1950 = 13 years (1951 left out to allow minimum 1 year travel time to Earth)
- for the months 04 to 06 in 1938-1950
- where the daily average exceeded 35 on NOAA "AA index".
- offset minus 2 days/degrees from UFO reports (Solar Storms take 1-4 days to reach Earth, our readings are 1-4 days delayed):
- On the right:
- unique UFOCAT reports (Duplicate UFOCAT PRNs/reports removed)
- in 1952/04-06
- Red/Blue colour code seems to show flaps of UFOs very loosely correlating with clumping up of solar plasma from the ejections of 1938-1950, caused by the solar magnetic field surge of Solar Cycle 18 (1944-1947).
- Solar eruptions have a minimum 10 degree/day width
- Not all eruptions will hit the Earth
-- so an exact correlation is not expected but similar lows are interesting.
- General increase in UFO reports when summer starts (USA: End of May + June)

Overall this looks fairly decent.

Part 2/2: 1952/07-09

TODO.

Some interesting correlations regarding potential UFO revelations.

> Who was the 17th Director of the NSA?
> https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/pentagon-and-intelligence-community-chiefs-have-urged-obama-to-remove-the-head-of-the-nsa/2016/11/19/44de6ea6-adff-11e6-977a-1030f822fc35_story.html
https://qmap.pub/read/3821

Q + 17 + NSA + Navy.

I speculate that the NSA is monitoring the Deep State which includes the CIA, and the public interest in pizzagate suggested to them that the public was ready for horrible revelations.

Also the US Navy:

>Over the last six months, The War Zone has been deeply reporting on a set of bizarre patents assigned to the U.S. Navy. The patents, which are all the product of a single inventor, truly sound like the stuff of science fiction and include high-temperature superconductors, gravitational wave generators, compact fusion reactors, and high-energy electromagnetic field generators. Most radical of all is the “hybrid aerospace-underwater craft” claimed to be able to “engineer the fabric of our reality at the most fundamental level” by seemingly bending the laws of physics as we know them. Together, these patents seem to be the building blocks of a vehicle with truly out-of-this-world, UFO-like performance. As part of our reporting, we have been working to better understand the mind behind this mysterious intellectual property. Now, the elusive Dr. Salvatore Cezar Pais has spoken to The War Zone.
...
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/31798/the-secretive-inventor-of-the-navys-bizarre-ufo-patents-finally-talks

>The US Navy secretly designed a super-fast futuristic aircraft resembling a UFO, documents reveal
...
https://metro.co.uk/2019/04/18/us-navy-secretly-designed-super-fast-futuristic-aircraft-resembling-ufo-documents-reveal-9246755/

Also likely the US Navy: >>66001 → (1893 Electric Monster: submarine attempting to fly?)

The Navy is a sensible place to experiment on levitating vehicles because it is an extension of the submarine.
If the Q stuff is about the slow exposure of the deep state then perhaps it includes the slow exposure of UFO-like technology also. Time will tell. Trumps Space Force is also interesting correlation in timing.

The most logical time for deep state massive exposure to the public is before the elections in November, after Trump is voted in subsequently then additional revelations could occur over the subsequent 4 years and might include the UFO tech and perhaps the UFO based MKULTRA-like UFO/ETI hoax. The UFO related patents allow control of the spread of the newly admitted technology. This fits well with the idea that the UFO waves are natural from the sun.

>>122937
>The US Navy secretly designed a super-fast futuristic aircraft resembling a UFO, documents reveal
Extremely doubtful, it sounds like more propaganda to me.
The US Navy is unable to make operational its last carrier, bought planes unable to outperform old models, introduced new ships unable to survive IRL combat. Hyped new technologies didn't work and the fleet is getting older and outdated.

>>122943
>offtopic
On top of that, US Navy ships filled with multiracial crews crashed in open seas with cargo vessels more than once.

>>122936
That post is garbage.

Error #1: It does not compare the whole of the UFO wave. This means it misses comparing the 1) start and the 2) end of the wave, but worse it also missed the 3) peak(s) of the UFO wave which was in July (and some hang over into August). Solution make a full year comparison.^

Error #2: If I have to color code my bar graph the the graph wasn't very convincing. It shows my bias.

Error #3a: I arbitrarily chose 1 year travel for no good reason. The previous wave studies show 5 year to 15 year travel time >>122936 . This is interesting because that is a 10 year difference, and 10 years is the solar and UFO cycle. I have some ideas for this but it will have to wait for now. I should choose a 5 year travel time minimum. But also...

Error #3b: By excluding the prior year to the wave under investigation I am excluding 1 year at the start but it becomes 2 excluded years at the end. An example: Lets say I am examining 1952 wave, I exclude 1951. When looking at Jan 1, 1952 I am excluding 1950 only (1 year). When looking at Dec 31, 1952 I have excluded all of 1951 AND all of 1952 (2 years). This biases the chart, it drifts from a 365 day exclusion to a 730 day exclusion at the end. This needs a complex solution which I will avoid for now.

^ Lets fix Error #1. Pic1 and 2 are for the whole of 1952 includes the peak of the UFO wave on the right. On the left is:
Pic1: the 1938-1950 geomagnetic storms added up for the same day of the year. This still suffers from Error #3a and #3b.
Pic2: the 1940-1941 geomagnetic storms added up for the same day of the year. This avoids all Errors but is purposely biased:

Pic2 was done after Pic1 failed to show that the sun was responsible for the 1952 UFO wave.
Pic2 was an attempt to bias the data selection based on my "Rosetta Stone" image Pic3, and biasedly selecting the strong nearby CMEs of 1940-41.
This biased data selection still failed to correlate the 1952 surge with the sun.
I then looked for other ETN events that might explain the 1952/07-08 UFO surge, such as new meteor shower. The search turned up nothing.
ETN (sun) did not make the UFO wave of 1952. Turning my attention to the other options...

+-------------+---------+
| intelligent | natural |
+------------------+-------------+---------+
| extraterrestrial | ETI | ETN |
+------------------+-------------+---------+
| terrestrial | TI | TN |
+------------------+-------------+---------+


TN (Earth nature) does not seem to have the capacity to put thousands of UFO sightings into the air.
ETI ("aliens") should be an option of last resort because we have not shown ETI civilizations exist and we are suspicious of psyops.
TI (man made). There is a letter dated October 1952 showing the CIA's interest in UFOs and psyops* but the 1952 surge happened in July/August.

* >>29447 →
* https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/document/cia-rdp81r00560r000100020017-2
* https://archive.ph/wip/on45I

What/Who did this? Must be time to look deeper at 1952...

>>122948
>I am excluding 1950 only (1 year).
Correction: I am excluding 1951 only (1 year).

>>122948
Second pic should say 1940-1941 in the red box on the right.

Sneak peak at what caused the 1952/07-08 UFO wave. It wasn't the UFOs, we had more witnesses (looking for Ruskies). Also we installed civilian airport radar and caught even more UFOs. Detailed post later.

Timeline of 1952 UFO Flap

>In Air Force terminology a “flap” is a condition, or situation, or state of being of a group of people characterized by an advanced degree of confusion that has not quite yet reached panic proportions. – The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects by Edward Rupelt (1956)

>“flaps” as flurries of ufo activity (sometimes quite intense) confined to comparatively localized areas. .. the whole of the rest of Britain and Europe was similarly effected by ufo visitations simultaneously, then a true ufo “wave” could be said to be taking place. Ufo “waves” also tend to occur on a cyclic basis – UFO Register - Vol 07 parts 1-2 1976–pp24-32

1952/01 Civil Aeronautics Administration Radar.

>“By 1952, the CAA had begun its first routine use of radar for approach and departure control.” – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_radar#Civil_aviation_radars

1947-1952/07 ASR-1 Departure Radar
It can't see past the airport and so it is used to control planes departing the airport.

>On January 7, 1952, after five years of testing and modifications to a radar system used by the Army and Navy in World War II, the Civil Aeronautics Administration inaugurated radar departure control procedures at its Washington National Airport. Six months later it began radar approach control procedures at the airport. – https://www.faa.gov/about/history/milestones/media/radar_departure_control.pdf and http://aireform.com/resources/faa-history-pages/faa-history-1950s/

>Their efforts succeeded and in January 1952, the CAA officially commissioned radar departure control at Washington National Airport using an ASR-1 Airport surveillance radar developed for especially for the CAA. – https://www.faa.gov/about/history/milestones/media/radar_departure_control.pdf

ASR-2 does not seem to have been installed.

1952/07 ASR-3 Approach Radar with Improved Antenna

>During the fiscal year 1952 [1952/07-1953/06] … Development of a substantially more accurate omnirange antenna, in corporating an electrical polarization screen, was completed. – The Annual Report of the Secretary of Commerce, Volumes 40-47: OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY FOR TRANSPORTATION https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uc1.a0002110831&view=1up&seq=63

>The Antenna of the Airfield Surveillance Radar ASR 3 was presented on an exposition in Berlin in 1953. First international installation was on Airport Bombay (India) in 1961. – https://www.radartutorial.eu/19.kartei/11.ancient/karte015.en.html

1952/07/19-20 Washington, D.C. UFO incident

The install timing of "approach radar" is constrained by the Washington National Airport traffic control detecting the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1952_Washington,_D.C._UFO_incident . So the install date is between July 1-19.

The major peak of the UFO flap is between about 1952/07/12 to 1952/08/08. Which means radar could have been responsible for the uptick in reports. I tested this by doing a chart for only basic witness-only sightings, but the uptick still existed.

1952/07/29 CIA

>We now know, of course, that in 1952 the CIA had recommended that a certain amount of mischief be introduced into private UFO societies following the wave of UFOs over Washington, D.C., which had compromised national security (or so it was said at the time). The story might have died with a very frightened and silenced Bender were it not for Gray’s explosive and entertaining book about the Bender case, They Knew Too Much About the Flying Saucers. – The Silver Bridge by Gray Barker (1970).

>Until the summer of 1952, the CIA had little interest in flying saucers. With the 1952 flap and the Invasion of Washington, however. this changed. On July 29 (the day of General Samiord’s press conference), Ralph L. Clark, Acting Assistant Director for Scientific Intelligence, wrote a memo to the Deputy Director for Intelligence. It said:
>>In the past several Weeks a number of radar and visual sightings of unidentified aerial objects have been reported. Although this office has maintained a continuing review of such reputed sightings during the past three years, a special study group has been formed to review this subject to date, O/CI [office of Current intelligence] will participate in this study with O/SI [Office of Scientific Intelligence] and a report should be ready about 15 August.
– Watch the Skies! by Curtis Peebles (1994)

(cont.)

1950/02-1959/1/31 Ground Observer Corps

1952/07/14<1959/1/31 Operation Skywatch

Korean War: 25 June 1950 – 27 July 1953

>It may not be a very cheerful thought but the Reds right now have about a thousand bombers that are quite capable of destroying at least 89 American cities in one raid…. Won't you help protect your country, your town, your children? Call your local Civil Defense office and join the Ground Observer Corps today. -- http://www.radomes.org/museum/documents/GOC/GOC.html ← Source: Schaffel, Emerging Shield, pp. 158 - 159.

>By 1952 the GOC program was expanded into Operation Skywatch, consisting of 750,000 volunteers aged 7 to 86 years old working in shifts at over 16,000 posts and 73 filter centers. -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground%20Observer%20Corps

>In February 1950, Continental Air Command Commander General Ennis C. Whitehead proposed the formation of a 160,000 civilian volunteer GOC to operate 8,000 observation posts scattered in gaps between the proposed radar network sites. With the belief that the Korean War served as a precursor to a possible Soviet attack, ADC had little difficulty recruiting volunteers. … This revised GOC plan, dubbed “Operation SKYWATCH,” was initiated on July 14, 1952. Eventually over 800,000 volunteers stood alternating shifts at 16,000 observation posts and seventy-three filter centers. The Air Force used a variety of means to recruit volunteers, including radio. – http://www.radomes.org/museum/documents/GOC/GOC.html

>All that was changed, on a Ground Observer Corps skywatch tower that night of July 27, 1952. .. To Roberts it was clearly circular in shape, slightly smaller than a ten cent piece held at arm's length. Through the binoculars it appeared to be as large as a half-dollar. It was definitely disk-shaped, as it presented part of its rim toward the observers. .. The [Air Force] official told Roberts the visual sighting had been confirmed by radar. – Watch the Skies! by Curtis Peebles (1994)

>OPERATION ‘SKYWATCH’ OPENS MONDAY
>Washington [July 12, 1952]—President Truman made a bid Saturday for more volunteers to man lookout stations which will go on a round-the-clock watch Monday [14th] against air invaders.Without saying directly that his aim was recruitments for “Operation Skywatch” around America’s air frontiers, the President still put over the point in a statement saying the project is “a common sense precaution in which Americans can serve proudly.” He added that the watchers will be helping to prevent war. The first shifts of some 150,000 volunteers will take their posts early Monday [14th] at about 6,000 stations in 27 states to scan the skies for any raiders who might slip through the radar screen for a sneak attack that could set off World War III.
>…
>AIR FORCE DENIES ‘SAUCER’ REPORTS ‘SKYWATCH’ CAUSE
>Washington-July 24—An Air Force spokesman “emphatically” denied last night the new crop of “flying saucer” reports had anything to do with putting volunteer aircraft spotters on 24-hour duty. The civilian ground observer corps began standing a round-the-clock watch this month in coastal and northern border states, the most likely avenues of enemy plane approach. The spokesman noted that saucer reports come from every direction.
>
>He said the sole function of the ground observers is to supplement the radar network of the Air Defense Command by watching for unidentified low-flying planes. Any flying saucers they see will be strictly incidental.
>…
>NEED MORE VOLUNTEERS FOR AIR SPOTTERS POST
>Although no flying saucers, blips, discs, or whatever their name is, have been reported from the Austin Town Hall skywatch station, Lake and Central, volunteers there would know just what to do should any of the nocturnal apparitions show up.
>…
– http://www.nicap.org/bluebook/skyw.htm

1951/12+ Flying Saucer Clubs

LIFE Magazine

>There is a case for interplanetary saucers – http://greyfalcon.us/The%20famous%20article%20of%20LIFE%20Magazine.htm
gave increased public credibility to flying saucers from other planets. (pic1)

>During 1952 the first flying saucer clubs had been organized. Among the early groups were the Civilian Saucer Investigators (CSI) and the International Flying Saucer Bureau. (IFSB), The CSI was technically oriented while the IFSB was a contactee group, Both groups folded within a few years, The longest lived of the early clubs was James and Coral Lorenzen’s Aerial Phenomena Research Organization (APRO). It was also founded in 1952 and would continue until the end of the 1980s. – Watch the Skies! by Curtis Peebles (1994)

>A number of UFO groups, some with grandiose goals, were formed in 1950 and 1951 in response to what was perceived as the government's apathy towards the subject of UFOs. Civilian Saucer Investigation (Los Angeles), Civilian Saucer Investigation (New Zealand), and Civilian Saucer Intelligence (New York), were three such groups – unrelated to each other despite the similarity of their names – established by private citizens with an interest in UFOs. -- https://www.project1947.com/shg/csi/csiintro.html

1951/12 Civilian Saucer Investigation (Los Angeles)

>The CSI was organised in December, 1951 -- http://files.afu.se/Downloads/Magazines/United%20States/CSI%20Quarterly/

1952/01 Aerial Phenomena Research Organization

>started in January 1952 -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerial%20Phenomena%20Research%20Organization

1952/10 International Flying Saucer Bureau

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gray%20Barker
Space review, October, 1952 first publication. -- http://files.afu.se/Downloads/Magazines/United%20States/Space%20Review%20(Bender)/
with an excellent summary of the 1952 sightings so far (pic2 & 3) which read more like our modern normal YouTube UFO videos, rather than Flying Saucers. Search 'https://youtu.be' in >>750 →

CIA 1952/10/02

(pic 1 & 2) UFOs + CIA = psyops
https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/document/cia-rdp81r00560r000100020017-2
https://archive.ph/wip/on45I

---

Now you might be thinking that all of this is enough crazy to fill an asylum. But the crazy is just starting...
Humans have maximized sky monitoring, the smallest bump in UFOs will be recorded in fine detail and tracked by radar.
Reports that would have failed to be recorded will be recorded, and reports that would have been recorded as say MA1 now become MA2 (with physical evidence) because radar confirmation moves the Vallee Classification from xx1 to xx2. No wonder the military starts freaking out.

Coincidentally, 1 month after the CIA is interested in UFOs for psyop purposes:

1952/11/20 Contactees

>On 20 November 1952, Adamski and several friends were in the Colorado Desert near the town of Desert Center, California, when they purportedly saw a large submarine-shaped object hovering in the sky. Believing that the ship was looking for him, Adamski is said to have left his friends and to have headed away from the main road. Shortly afterwards, according to Adamski's accounts, a scout ship made of a type of translucent metal landed close to him, and its pilot, a Venusian called Orthon,[17] disembarked and sought him out. Adamski claimed the people with him also saw the Venusian ship, and several of them later stated they could see Adamski meeting someone in the desert, although from a considerable distance. -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George%20Adamski

There is then a long stream of "contactees" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contactee
Pic3 is them sorted by date of reporting their encounters (not stated date of encounters because I distrust those who try to re-write history, I assume, to make a myth).

The only significant contactee prior to the CIA letter is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel%20Eaton%20Thompson have a read of that bullshit. Your IQ has to be pretty low to not even do astrology correctly. But here is an interesting question: Who is lying, the witness or the pilots? Was the witness unwittingly hallucinating? Did some one make him hallucinate? Note that the craft can't be photographed. Is he next to a plasma blob hallucinating?

1953/10 IFSB

>The IFSB is puzzled and somewhat surprised by the numerous inquiries it has received regarding the same subject. The writers all desire to know what information we had available on persons having actually been taken for a ride in flying saucers. Since we cannot answer all the inquiries we received, we are giving our answer now : To the best of our knowledge no such incident has ever taken place.” – Space Review vol2 no4.

I wonder who was stoking the fire?

---

I'll take a break and then come back with an analysis of the effects of humans over monitoring the sky because Soviet Communists have 1000 planes that they want to use to nuke 89 American cities!

Pic1 is the SKYWATCH vs non-SKYWATCH states overlayed with UFOCAT report counts.
Pic2 is non-SKYWATCH state New Mexico with a single spike on the 29th in the flap period.
Pic3 is non-SKYWATCH state Texas with nothing significant going on.
Next post we look at California in depth as a contrast.

Pic1 is SKYWATCH state California with a flap shape similar to >>122948 (pic1 and 2)
Pic2 is a comparison of newspaper article counts begging people to watch the skies over and over from https://cdnc.ucr.edu/ leading up to the UFO flap period resulting in the Air Force not getting USSR nuclear bomber reports but UFOs instead.

Pic3:
>Norton [Air Force Base] got into the “flying saucer” news this week when the Air Force issued a standard form for recording the interrogation of “saucer sighters” and the air intelligence officer of the 27th Air Division (Defense), a tenant organization at the base, announced that he will receive the reports from this area for evaluation and processing. The 25-question form, titled “Unidentified Flying Object Reporting Form” is being distributed nationally to ground observers of “Operation Skywatch” but are not available as yet to the general public, according to Lt. Alice H. Holberg, 27th Air Division public information officer. It was explained that the new forms, issued through the Air Defense Command, is a preliminary interrogation for possible follow-up by Air Intelligence. It is divided into four categories: Brief description of the object or objects, time of observing object or objects, manner of observation and location of observer. Among the questions are the fol lowing : What is the shape, size, color, number, formation aerodynamic features, condensation trail or exhaust, propulsion type, approximate speed, sound, maneuvers executed, manner of disappearance, unusual features, location of observer, time of sighting, duration of sighting, approximate distance and altitude, direction from observer, direction travelled, weather conditions and air traffic at the time, (and to top them all) Did you get any photographs or fragments?
-- San Bernardino Sun, Volume 6, Number 18, 10 August 1952, page 9
-- https://cdnc.ucr.edu/?a=d&d=SBS19520810.1.9&srpos=35&e=------195-en--20--21-byDA-txt-txIN-%22operation+skywatch%22----1952---1

SKYWATCH made the UFO flap of 1952. And nothing suggests they weren't watching (former) solar metal or H/He plasma.

something I failed to save but on the subject, UFOs exist. see an airborne object or aircraft you cannot identify, it's an UFO waiting to be explained.
Extraterrestrial ships never been a thing, but this conspiracy is engineered to make people believe the government hides secrets, and to keep people scared, or obsessed about paranormal shit.

UFOs and ETs are essentially a weapon the media keep to get people terrified, just like global warming. it's alarmism, but if a media, as orson welles did successfully, manage to create panic, they can control anyone, and with this fear, the governments will allow themselves what they want on the principle of fear.

There's no ET. No invasion. But the mass media and Hollywood prepared you for this, to get all nations to cooperate like the globalists want with the climate, and the same with a hypothetical ET invasion, to force in a new world order.

AFAIK all the UFOs observed were explained objects, or experimental fighters on the area-51. The rednecks around it seeing a strange triangular flying thing would assume it's an UFO. it's just a new concept jet no one should know

>>122990
I mostly agree. I suspect that back in the cold war the threat of nuclear annihilation was perceived to be so high (Operation SKYWATCH) that anything was considered better. The idea of making a fake space brotherhood or fake alien invasion (CIA psyops) was considered better than millions dead. This, I suspect, is what tipped the CIA into the deep state/lefty/globalists/fake news/hippies mind set.

Over time the allowance of faking to the public has infested leadership with liars and psychopaths which has ruined any chance of the assumed utopia to follow the end of nationalism/nuke wars.

Thanks for posting. I was wondering if I posting into a black hole. :) Working on the wave of 1954 and bettering the sun hypothesis by setting limits on the travel time of the plasma.

>>122992
>I was wondering if I posting into a black hole. :)
You're not.
Even if the stuff you post is mostly esoteric to say the least, it is read without missing a single post.

>>122993
Thanks, fren!

Should get interesting when I redo the timeline from "UFO pilots" perspective.

>>122995
sneak peak: http://cufos.org/HUMCAT/
fun reading but only a tiny percent of UFO reports.

>>122992
you're welcome! also thanks for all the info on this thread, we're not the only ones who kind of researched really who want us to believe all that.

And indeed, whenever the media, news or some holywood-inspired scare show propagates bullshit about Roswell, pyramids, and more, it's scaremongering.
Just followed by Hitler's secret plan for world domination and some ghost hunting stories, and this is the shit you see all the time on the biggest manipulation tool : Television.

I love science fiction, Startrek and all that, but if we are thousands of years from dominating the galaxy, let's keep in mind the other civilizations are on the same level as ours, and we are all limited by speed of light. Also astronomically speaking we are kind of in the desert, the bled, the deep countryside of the galaxy lost between Toufiaux-les-oies and Clamergey, while there are areas in the galaxy that are more dense, more proper for eventually the stats of having two civilizations can eventually communicate.
Drake's equation is very important for that.

Like Anon said earlier ITT, anything, any UFO will be identified soon or late, that's science.
- A phenomenon is observed
- Research will be done, theories will come about what have been observed.
- Time and more evidence will gather to correlate with the observation.

We will find out it was an experiment in high altitude, a broken missile that went out of control in a suborbital flight, a stealth jet or drone tested by the army ( yes that's really what Area51 is all about, no ET shit, just skilled engineers) and that phenomenon of light is the sky are just particles due to solar winds or ionized gas in the high atmosphere, or even a strange interpretation of what is now detectable on multimode, networked radars since the 90's or seen on an infrared camera... yep : [YouTube] Chilean Government Confirms Unidentified Flying Object Is Unidentified | NowThis [Embed]
I assure you that's a two engine jet fighter, Certainly a F15. F18 or a Mig29, but that's free real estate for the mainstream media to show anyone these images and tell them «UFOs are here, this is real footage! Mysteries! Unexplained phenomenons! We are observed!» making people paranoid, believing the government is very powerful and hide things, that makes them look stronger and invincible, but it's just makeshift the World's establishment wants us all to believe.

>>122962
CIA being essentially masters in term of manipulation more than anything it's not even surprising they redacted this kind of info, knowing one day it would be found.

>>122997
My father saw a huge flying oval overhead while driving on a highway in California in the 1970's. It had different colored lights all around and was completely silent, and was moving much faster than a blimp could. There was no report of anything like that in any newspaper.

He doesn't tend to make stories up but his idea is that aliens visit earth from time to time but are incapable of evil. Of course I can't just say "isn't it possible?" because of course it technically is possible, but isn't something that can be proven. What do you think of the idea that there are real aliens and the CIA makes hoax stories?

>>122998
What is a fact is that your father saw a huge flying oval overhead while driving on a highway in California in the 1970's.
I totally believe him. He saw an object or a phenomenon he could not identify. My uncle also assured me he saw something in the night at a certain distance like a swarm of lights over the woods from his apartment's living room.
He also assured me it was extraterrestrials, but for him. it was just UFOs.
Different colored lights and silent, could have been anything, but like you said, his idea is that they are aliens.
Where the media and hollywood have worked well, is to make people believe and fear what they don't understand.

Anything you can see and not being able to identify, someone will, and it don't even need to be a thing in the sky. Pick a random person and ask him/her to tell what they see here. For 99,9% of the population these will be Unidentified, non-flying objects. I can still throw some in the air and they are flying, turning someone with a GOOD camera completely crazy and that would make it in the news, strange shaped thing found! Are we alone? 99.9% of the population will shit their pants, the 0.1% who know what it is will laugh their asses off.

>>122998
>My father saw a huge flying oval overhead while driving on a highway in California in the 1970's.

If you give me a date I can see if I have anything for that date/location in UFOCAT or UFO Journals.

>What do you think of the idea that there are real aliens and the CIA makes hoax stories?

I spent most of my research years thinking aliens were real until I did a timeline of UFO reports and I saw that the actions of the pilots were in alignment with advanced human technology of that time. Ordinary humans are not aware of what is cutting edge. For example >>67329 → scoop marks on abductees or >>752 → 1897 flight suits.

Aliens likely exist but I see no evidence that they have found us yet. I am looking tho.

>He doesn't tend to make stories up but his idea is that aliens visit earth from time to time but are incapable of evil.

Our belief in aliens is just a modernisation of "beings from heaven" that religions have. It is the hope that a superior (technological now rather than spiritual) parent will come and save childish us. But I am looking forward to doing a deep dive into the evolution of the UFO pilots because it will show an interesting evolution.

I think we all have the natural instinct to assume that a mystery is by default intelligent. When a primitive man hears rustling in a nearby bush he needs to assume it is a predator or another person about to attack him. This natural assumption increases his survival chances as he points his spear at the bush.
When driving our car and we see a light in the sky we need to do the same thing, assume the worst and get prepared for fight or flight. If we never discover what it was then the instinct will remain that it is intelligent and it's motives uncertain. Most people consider their feelings a description of truth, that instinct produces our feelings. After successfully "escaping" "the aliens" in the 1970s he has relieved his fear by blindly believing they can't be evil. I would not try to change his opinions, he is dealing with the fearful experience the best he can and it seems like a good way to cope.

What is interesting about all of this in general is that we are still primitives regardless of having mobile phones etc.

>>122291 →
>>122293 →
H.G. Wells & George Orwell could not have known their warnings would be used as guidelines by thinktank skunks. By 1949 dozens of technologies used to create falsified memory states were in open & weaponized usage. Will soon be in position to readdress technological Bell curve given with greater emphasis & leadup to following usages.

>>122355 →
>>122371 →
>>122372 →
>>122374 →
Neither "infotainment" nor "disinfotainment". Consider originating source: near-impossible to blackmail, hard to assassinate, rabble rouser. Free thinker, leaves conventional options open, uses correlations for potential causation. Remains unconvinced by known propaganda lines. Genuine. Would call him 'normie' save for intensive fact finding abilities. Underwhelming for you, yes, not for same reasons discussed earlier. Blue Wall of Silence not complete protection. He knows it. Nigerian Parking Shits not convincing given previous lies. Forget Services on do not talk list. Easy trip to Dips.
#1a: "impossible" describes lack of evidence. Originator unconvinced by (((aliens))) and (((supernatural))) both. Thinks in three dimensions. Lambasts 'other' possibilities, yet leaves questions open for discussion. Researcher, studious, open mind. Difficult to fool given history, not impossible. Derides (((miracles))).
#1b: "makes no sense" describes lack of convincing 'evidence'. Neither Zeus nor Thor create lightning. Atmospheric-ground conditions do. Offers facts, does not slide interpretations towards biased opinion. Not fooled. Definite key note.
#1c: "unsolvable" describes lack of key witnesses, information, facts. Denies use of speculation via focus & attention to details, facts. Not stupid, does not accept (((blue books))).
#2: witness leading used as median passive-helpful coercion method to create cross-referenced details & facts. 'Witnesses' attempted to ascribe (((supernatural))) or (((alien))) meanings to events. Attempts to locate information created >60% likely failure: 'witness' became witless. Too emotional, could not reason properly. Leaves known facts as placeholder until/unless further information given.
#3: hypothermia/hyperthermia little understood pre-world war jew. Considered "wild madness", "snow fever", etc. Paradox of intent. Focus on fact finding precludes ridiculousness, hard to fool.
#4: "weather manipulation/control" mechanisms available post-1941. Documents on hand, Herr Vril. Compare.
#5: propaganda from tiny sources intentionally snowballed by """exposure""". Compare.
#6a: forced 'selection biases'. Create story to follow. Easy to 'believe', simple to manipulate. Give 'reason' to accept fallacies. Witnesses are witless. Auto-accept external suggestions. How deep? Project NORTHERN SHELTER. Funny yet stupid.
#6b: Selective Memory Syndrome (artificial). Inherently prone to abuse. 1953 onwards.
#6c: lack of technological understanding in Jewnited Estates. First stealth helicopter debuted in 1953, secret project. First stealth jet debuted in 1957, secret project. Dozens of firsts not known to "public". Compare.
#7: no mermaids, no vampires, no aliens. "Clever men" using fear, projection, control.
#8: human brain lacks cognizant distinctions between reality, false memories, delusion. Directed pseudo-sociopathic warfare. 1961 in timeline.
#9: scent/pheromone destroying chemicals in abundance since 1907. Cheap, easily concealed 'cleaning chemicals'. Not considered until FBI investigations into "heart attack gun" traces of La Sia/Pissad operatives. Marked/unmarked low fliers common in heavy traffic areas. Laughable diversion. Not fooled.
#10: lack of current knowledge. Today's technological innovations unthinkable to previous generation. Hydrogen slush fuel used by 'old timers'. New tech: onboard synchronized micro reactors, plasmatic & thorium based. Keeping pace or understanding difficult without context.

New dataline given by ultra-paranoid colleague: weaponized use of inherently disruptive conditions/locales. Why set trap on 'game trail' if chance of 'success' only <10%? Simple solution best: place traps in known locations. 'Fields' used throughout history, Herr Vril. Apply all four meanings. !!SCIENCE!!

>>123015
Afternon,

I appreciate your posts and the apparent insider information. This discussion/debate has made me realise something that I would like to share with you.

The Detective: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Paulides is a detective. His priority in that type of work is speed in catching a perpetrator. This means that precision and logic is less emphasised and so following all leads including intuition, gut and witness badgering is allowable. This means the detective process can be a bit sloppy if the goal is still reached in a timely manner.

The Insider: is (You). You don't need evidence, you don't need proof, because you have apparently lived it to some degree and have shadowy contacts that can pass on more info. You live in a world of nefariousness and endless rumours. The rumours are believable because of your personal experiences. You don't need proof.

The Researcher: is me. The researcher tries to convert claims into facts using evidence and logic. The researcher can't appeal to faith, friendship, trust, gut instinct or insiders (You) as "evidence". The researcher should not be converting people to a new belief, he should be showing facts that the reader is unable to refute due to iron clad data and logic. The perfect research result would show data with zero comment and all readers would logically reach the same conclusion. (I am reading up on statistics currently.) No need for trust or faith. A researcher is like a historian building up a view of the past based on data.

I think the above explains the apparent conflict between us and our styles. I am the hardest to convince because I have the intent of one day presenting my UFO research more publicly. And since a person only ever gets one first impression publicly, I intend to make it an iron clad, totally unrefutable, first impression. I am not a detective and I am not an insider, nor can I be.

You and I are friends, but I won't compromise high quality researcher ethics even for a friend. Your posts I treat as claims for consideration awaiting evidence, I may even hunt the evidence myself. I love your posts but they will never be gospel. I hope you keep posting, but I hope more you will back up your claims more. Please don't be offended by this post, I respect your efforts and your apparent life experiences and the follow on consequences.

I will spend more time considering your posts details and reply later but I wanted to clarify why I think we are processing data differently.

P.S. as an insider you are prone to see anything and nefariousness first. You have a hammer and you are treating everything as a nail, even the things that aren't nails. My UFO research has biased me to seeing UFOs as up to 97% natural. I also know that UFOs have multiple answers not just one answer. Therefore I am biased/skeptical towards processing "women lying naked in a river" as 97% probability of being natural (hypothermia) and a very small number of 411s as nefarious. If you want to persuade me that most 411s are nefarious classified tech then do more posts like >>67308 → . I am skeptical in the proper use of the word, ie. I am not a debunker, I listen, I consider, I look for facts that support: no facts = no support = claim not proven.

With respect,
Vril.

An interesting correlation:

>>765 → pic1 bottom image with the flat disk suspended above the "craft".
and
>>122793 → pic4 and the comment regarding PRN 15249. Pic is the details of the account.

Gives the impression that German flying saucer tech was responsible.
This case is part of a 'Latin America' list which starts, interestingly on July 23, 1947, and continues until 1965. An earlier version of discs and UFOs appears to be >>65814 → .

1954 Wave. A clump of Geomagnetic storm dates over 100 on the NOAA index matches the clump dates for the 1954 UFO wave.

Getting harder to manage all of the data and correlate. Also it seems some plasma blobs arrived after only 3 years! Setting a new record.

It seems to take about a week for the UFO sighting effect to fade out based on the timing of the end of the storm clump and the UFO report lows. This was slightly interfered with by the 1951/10/28 geostorm/solar ejection which pushed sightings back up for 2 days in 1954/10/27-28 before letting them fall off again.

Can I play Planet Explorers now? :D

We don't know why aeroplanes fly! WTF.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/no-one-can-explain-why-planes-stay-in-the-air/

>>123032
It's because air moving above a curved surface has more velocity and therefore generates less pressure, pushing the wing up. Or are they talking about something else?

>>123033
Planes can fly upside down. Every simple theory has flaws. It seems to be 4 effects working together but no one knows.

[YouTube] Flying Saucer Mystery [Embed]
The Flying Saucer Mystery, 1950

[YouTube] The Flying Saucer Mystery - (Full) (1952) [Embed]
The Flying Saucer Mystery - (Full) (1952)

>>123019
You are correct in most respects, Herr Vril. However, I am never convinced even when all possible avenues, routes, roads, paths, and flight plans have been substantiated beyond the most difficult to obtain burdens of proof. As you have corrected me numerous times, I have logically considered, agreed, and changed my thought processes/actions according to reason. The times I have attempted to correct you with direct entreaty & knowledge were treated with proper suspicion necessary to your own survival instincts. That is natural intelligence et humanis. That eagerness to identify, correlate, and understand is remarkable. For a time that was lost. There is no basis for me to decry nor denigrate your behaviors. As stated before: I pass on what is directly available, not necessarily what is essentially or absolutely correct. It is neither wanted nor necessary to convince you, only to expose outside thinking. This was a simple double-exposure on the how rather than a "why" certain natural phenomena in specific regions are used in, or as, the context of a trap. You will certainly recall my knowledge of piezoelectric inventions, fields, affects/effects, processes, theories, etc. Have begun compiling a closed system in order to sort interesting, curious, and naturally significant events by date, technological level, experimental levels, and relevance. Originally I did not, or could not, understand the possibilities & implications for abuse of natural phenomena being as wide spread as they have become. You exposed that to me. In return I desire a greater benefit, a return to original inspiration. Mutual, not singular.

In attempting to study all possible data on directly natural explanations which replacing otherwise 'unexplainable' events, those specific ones which have been strung out using paranoid (((supernatural))) explanations are now startlingly simple to see. The detective is not wrong, yet he is not right. The thousands of 411 cases have proven that nature is far stranger and less coherent than directed technology, regardless of source. An intriguing yet tiring conclusion.

Have you ever considered bathing in a natural hot spring, Herr Vril? It is rumored that there are numerous health benefits. Rumors that, of course, are anecdotal. You'll see soon.

>>123079
>only to expose outside thinking.
This is always appreciated. The bigger the box of possibilities the more likely the finding of a correlation suitable for rigorous testing and hopefully passing said test.

>Originally I did not, or could not, understand the possibilities & implications for abuse of natural phenomena being as wide spread as they have become.
One of the problems I am likely to run into with UFO pilots is that it may not be possible to discern between external naturally induced hallucinations and artificially evilly induced hallucinations. Currently I flag these as "witness compromised" but I am not categorising if natural or intentional yet. A deeper look later + timelining may give some ideas. Similar appearance and evolution of appearances may help too.

It is interesting to consider that heightened solar activity makes schizophrenia more likely in some people. I am also concerned that nature is using this is a uplift of mood for people requiring spiritual assumptions. ie. a person dies and exposure to natural mag fields or infra-sound leads to a presumed seeing of the dead persons ghost. I am also concerned that our subconscious will purposely lie to out conscious to re-stablise our conscious, for example religious visions in distressed people. Objectively life is kind of stupid and aging makes it increasingly stupider (effort vs reward). All the effort leads to death still anyway. There must, therefore, be a delusion to make going on "sensible". Alternatively, the concept of conscious atoms is astounding and should not be squandered.

Having said that, I have had personal paranormal experiences where items literally vanished and literally re-appeared. Sadly I never saw the transitions but I was alone. And double verified the absence in one case.

The story: After a grandparent had died, I was staying in their house, and it was the habit to hang the door keys on a hook about 2 meters up a wall near the locked front door. One day, with only me and a cat in the house, I went to check the mail and the keys were unusually absent from the hook. I searched the house, no keys. I felt with my hands and looked with my eyes at the hook, no keys. After some frustration I recalled I had spare keys in the spare room in a forgotten draw. I used the keys to check the mail, came back ready to hang the spare keys on the hook, but I could not, the old keys had returned! This does not prove a dead person moved them, it does not disprove such either. There was nothing for the cat to jump on. I was gone for a minute and could observe anyone entering the property.

I am therefore not opposed to the paranormal, but extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. But I also realise debunkers use this to escape the extraordinary by not willingly researching extraordinary claims with the same attentiveness as the ordinary, ego and cultural assumptions does not allow them to do so.

Truth-seeking is a lonely and ego destroying pursuit. Ultimately you become loyal to data, not people and not even your own feelings. But two truth-seekers are unavoidably companions ultimately, because there is only one truth and therefore only a smaller and smaller subset of paths and therefore they walk side-by-side closer and closer, loyalty not required, common cultural values not required, fighting not required: the objective facts exist or they do not. If you fill yourself with truths, ego is not required. You simply cite a reference and move on.

>In return I desire a greater benefit, a return to original inspiration. Mutual, not singular.
I assume this means your adjustments are having a healthy positive impact on you. :) I did wonder if a reduction in assumed nefariousness might lower your burdens.

>Have you ever considered bathing in a natural hot spring, Herr Vril? It is rumored that there are numerous health benefits. Rumors that, of course, are anecdotal. You'll see soon.
Should I process this in an ominous way? My health was low at one point but the application or research and logic rescued it. I am usually quite healthy now. Doctors are a money-making con for pharma. Imagine my doctors face with a turned up with a flow chart of what was my concern. Imagine later I turn up with my own solution, and he then agrees. >mfw I healed my self with the help of cocoa and dark chocolate! Yum!

>>123079
Do 411s have a solar/10year/11year cycle??

>>123086
>Having said that, I have had personal paranormal experiences where items literally vanished and literally re-appeared. Sadly I never saw the transitions but I was alone. And double verified the absence in one case.
Sounds like your grandparent was quite a prankster! This is nothing surprising to most people, as we've all had occasions like that. In fact, there is a Catholic saint (Anthony of Padua) from whom help is requested quite regularly to find missing items.

As for one experience of my own, a year ago I woke up to find myself quite immobilized with a dark wisp-like spirit hovering over the foot of my bed, hands clasped in prayer. At the time I was certain it was an actual spirit, but later I decided it was probably just the typical case of sleep paralysis. Still, nothing like that happened before or since so I cannot be 100% certain one way or another. It's quite strange to wonder whether something you see is actually there or not. Perhaps one such experience is what caused Descartes to make his philosophy-destroying assertion that senses and the physical world are not to be trusted.

>But two truth-seekers are unavoidably companions ultimately, because there is only one truth and therefore only a smaller and smaller subset of paths and therefore they walk side-by-side closer and closer, loyalty not required, common cultural values not required, fighting not required: the objective facts exist or they do not. If you fill yourself with truths, ego is not required. You simply cite a reference and move on.
Perhaps this is why academics working together tend to become the best of friends, regardless of background. Also may be why /pol/ has an indomitable culture.

>>123032
Intriguing. It left me perplexed.

>>123089
The longer a mystery remains the more likely it has multiple causes, but the researches are still looking for one cause which they will never find.

Improving and automating chart production, work in progess.

More progress.
Examining 1947 UFO wave of June and July and historical solar/geomagnetic storms near the same dates.
Pic1: 1 year wide, month resolution. It suggests look at 1947/06-07.
Pic2: 2 month wide, day resolution. It suggests look at 1947/07/01-15.
Pic3: 15 days wide, 3 hour resolution. It suggests solar/geomagnetic storms of 1941 made the bulk of the 1947/06-07 wave.
Looking for a solution to the repeating colors in the bars.

>>123097
You might need to download the wide images to zoom.

>>122800
I just wanted to thank you for the effort posts and for creating this (and the last thread), OP. I haven't looked much into the UFO stuff myself, but I find these posts very interesting nonetheless. polite sage

>>123187
You are welcome fren, thanks for the message and encouragement. Now look what you have done:

---

Containing plasma blobs, naturally, with the suns magnetic field to produce magnetic bottles and then inserting the bottled plasma in the Earth's atmosphere.
Preliminary investigation links and thoughts:

How does a magnetic bottle work? - https://www.quora.com/How-does-a-magnetic-bottle-work?share=1#
Science Action: How does a magnetic field confine a plasma? - [YouTube] Science Action: How does a magnetic field confine a plasma? [Embed]

Now consider the chaotic nature of the sun's magnetic field at maximum:
Watch the Sun's Magnetic Field Twist and Turn - https://www.discovermagazine.com/the-sciences/watch-the-suns-magnetic-field-twist-and-turn (pic1)

the sweeping motions of the magnetic tide as it sweeps up plasma to insert onto the earth:
https://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/ssbsite/documents/webpage/ssb_169591.pdf (pic2)
Subsiding geomagnetic and solar radiation storms - https://watchers.news/2014/04/21/subsiding-geomagnetic-and-solar-radiation-storms/ (pic3)

Now consider a metallic plasma ejection. Notice is pic2 that the electron wave arrives first, this is the GeoMagnetic Storm detected. It is likely that protons arrive next as they are denser but have the same level of electric charge. And way at the back in pic2 is the ions. These are high density, high mass atomic nuclei ions. We even know what they are:

The sun has https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_energetic_particles which are made up of "They consist of protons, electrons and HZE ions". What is a HZE?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HZE_ions : Prominent HZE ions: Carbon (C), Oxygen (O), Magnesium (Mg), Silicon (Si), Iron (Fe)
The sun eats space rocks and shits metal then sweeps it onto the Earth!

1a. Imagine this scenario, you are a metal plasma ejected from the sun, the sun's magnetic field lines have bottled you up into a blob. But the space environment also has electrons being streamed out from the sun. Your outer shell is collecting electrons and transforming into a ordinary metal hull containing a plasma core. You get dropped into the Earth's atmosphere at night, the plasma core is stealing electrons from the hull and the hull is stealing electrons from the atmosphere or from the Earth's magnetosphere. You glow. See >>120702 → .

1b. Or you get dropped into the atmosphere during the day your, now ordinary metallic, hull is seen by people and reported using the generic term "flying saucer". The labelling of UFOs is a very interesting cultural phenomena, we label UFOs with the latest tech of the day. UFOs in the airship times become mystery airships. New aeroplanes? Ghost Fliers. New long range rockets? Ghost Rockets. ?????? -> Flying Saucers? The implication is that there must have been man-made flying saucers to cause the labelling of the UFOs as flying saucers*, if the pattern of social behaviour holds. Pics 2 and 3 @ >>122961 show the "flying saucers" of 1952 are more like plasma than manufactured flying saucers. Abuse and cultural bias of incorrect labelling leading to assumptions that aren't true.

* The initial use of the term saucer and disc was to describe the skipping motion of the Kenneth Arnold sighting in 1947, "like a saucer skipping over water", but the label seems to have been kept due to the seen shape also. Perhaps the seen shape is the small number of human craft and the rest is (former) plasma visualised (pareidolia) as a "flying saucer" due to social/media conditioning? Or perhaps a natural plasma core with a metal hull (dense matter moves to the outside, centrifugal force) with high speed rotation causes an oblate spheroid shape, in a gravity environment it droops into a saucer shape. The light plasma core wants to float, the metal wants to fall. Perhaps this naturally made shape inspired the man-made shaped flying saucers? Maury Island incident seems like this. ( http://www.beamsinvestigations.org/The%20Coming%20of%20the%20Saucers%20%281952%29%20PDF%20Digital%20Edition%20%28July%202011%29.pdf Search for: As I looked up from the wheel on my boat )

2. You are a H/He only plasma^, bottled up by the sun's mag field, then perhaps the Earth's magnetic field (they are connected), you get dropped into the Earth's atmosphere, you glow fiery orange and float because you are composed of a lifting gas. You blink out and will never be seen again because you are clear gas.

^ Historically the sun had two types of prominences, normal prominences (H/He) and metallic prominences (which is what started this whole metal from the sun theory).

Lagrange Points: Parking Places in Space - https://www.space.com/30302-lagrange-points.html

The Earth's uneven magnetic fields - https://archive.epa.gov/esd/archive-geophysics/web/html/geomagnetic_field.html (pic4) is the magnetic density "slope" over the USA (and South America etc.) the cause of plasma/UFO concentrations? The natural place for charged particles to enter the Earth's atmosphere is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aurora#Occurrence but does the "magnetic mountain" over Canada send the particles "downhill" into the USA?

Plenty of science for the idea of the sun sweeping plasma to us as part of its solar cycle after ejecting it, and perhaps the Earths mag field (plus witness density) biasing the location of UFO reports.

/end wall of text.

I am going to do a run through of all the UFO waves using the new automated graph making process.
I will spoiler the images and my interpretations.

1896 November Mystery Airships
These chart pics are the first Mystery Airships in 1896 November. The bigger wave of Mystery Airships is in 1897. I'll do that next.
The first 3 images in this post are the raw data from UFOCAT and NOAA geomagnetic storm intensities where they are > 100 added together if multiples.
The last 2 images are my interpretation. If you want, draw your own conclusions from pics 1-3 then look at mine in pics 4-5.

My interpretation:
Pic 1 of the year 1896 shows a spike of Geomagnetic Storms in 1882 in Novembers prior to a UFO spike in 1896 November. Dig deeper there.
Pic2 shows the spike in 1882 Geomagnetic Storms offset by about 5 days from the Mystery Airship wave. Dig deeper into 1896/11/12-30.
Pic3 shows the 3hourly resolution for Geomagnetic Storms (most prominently 1882) and seems to still be offset by about 5 days. The 3 hourly resolutions shows the storms lasted up to 2.5 days, meaning most likely multiple solar ejections. Remember pic2 showed us that we need to offset our comparison by about 5 days.
Pic4 and 5 is is my interpretation in visual scribble form.

Is this method of presenting the data decent?

>>123201
The Geomagnetic Storm of November 1882:
>In November 1882, an intense magnetic storm related to a large sunspot group caused widespread interference to telegraph and telephone systems and provided spectacular and unusual auroral displays. The (ring current) storm time disturbance index for this storm reached maximum −Dst ≈ 386 nT, comparable to Halloween storm of 29–31 October 2003, but from 17 to 20 November the aa midlatitude geomagnetic disturbance index averaged 214.25 nT, the highest 4 day level of disturbance since the beginning of aa index in 1868. This storm contributed to scientists' understanding of the reality of solar‐terrestrial interaction. Past occurrences of magnetic storms, like that of November 1882, can inform modern evaluations of the deleterious effects that a magnetic superstorm might have on technological systems of importance to society.
...
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2017SW001795

1897 April Mystery Airships
First 3 pics are raw data. Last 2 are my interpretations.

My interpretation:
Pic1 shows the 1897 UFO wave occurring mostly in April. [It also shows the 1882 Solar Storm in November. However we know this caused the 1896 Mystery Airships and so is not relevant to this 1897 discussion.] Dig into April.
Pic2 suggests there are three sets of solar storms causing the 1897 UFO wave. Two of the sets belong to 1882 (which also caused the 1896 "airship" wave). And one set belongs to 1892*. The 1882 storms are offset by about -4 days/degrees. The 1892 is offset by about -6 days/degrees. Dig into 1897/04/07-30.
Pic3 shows the storms in 3hr detail. The storms lasted up to 21 hours implying multiple ejections. The offset is close to pic2 expectations.

* The 1892 storm seems to have managed to cause a spike of UFOs after only 5 years travel. A look at the legend on the top right of pic 3 or 5 indicates the proximity of the solar storm timing to the maximum of the solar cycle. It says for 1892: "SC▲-2y" this means 1892 was 2 years before the solar maximum in 1894. A meta theory is being tested with this. Does the closeness of the solar storm ejection(s) to the solar cycle peak have an effect on the speed of the plasma reaching Earth? The assumption is that the ejecta from the sun needs help to escape the intense sun gravity close to the ejection site. If the sun has a heightened magnetic field at the time, the ejecta gets maximum early magnetic acceleration. It might be that strong solar ejections when the sun is quieter don't produce UFO sightings. These charts will allow a simple meta test of this hypothesis once all the charts have been generated.