/vx/ - Videogames and Paranormal


If you want to see the latest posts from all boards in a convenient way please check out /overboard/
Note: JS is reccomended to be able to post effortlessly, but I am working on a system where that won't be needed.

Name
Email
Subject
By clicking New Reply, I acknowledge the existence of the Israeli nuclear arsenal.
Comment
0
Select File / Oekaki
File(s)
Password (For file and/or post deletion.)

vx-ufos.jpg
ea2xwY.jpg
PABXSQ.jpg
Most UFOs are solar plasma. All aliens are humans dressed strangely.
Anonymous
m0WOG
?
No.122800
122802 123187
Previous thread >>750 →

TL;DR summary:

* Humans have always experimented with exotic aircraft that the general public is not familiar with.
> Humans may be attempting to false flag aliens more recently. >>121954 → >>29447 → (CIA)
> No evidence of extra-terrestrial civilisations exists.
> Grey "aliens" arrive soon MKULTRA gets shut down and sun UFOs decline. >>122291 → >>122515 →
> UFO pilots evolve from human
* The sun (Mass: 99.9% Solar System. Volume: 1.3 million Earths) ejects plasma larger than the Earth.
> Historically the sun had more metal available for ejecting. >>116089 →
> The metallic solar surface was from about 1870s to 1950s. >>113025 →
> The plasma takes a few years to a few decades to reach Earth but appears to not orbit the sun. >>122557 → (pic, see pre-1940s)
> The metal plasma UFO era is therefore from about 1870s to 1970s. Especially 1890s,1940s-1970s. >>122665 → (pic2)
> The sun and UFO waves had a 10 year cycle during these periods. >>114081 →
> The sun grand cycle (a few centuries long) corresponds with the UFO "grand cycle". >>102249 → >>122095 →
> The search for UFO waves (500+ UFO reports in a month) that do not correlate with solar storms continues. >>122793 →
* Witnesses/Investigators can misperceive events
> Witnesses can hallucinate aliens >>90125 →
> Increased solar activity = increased schizophrenia >>90125 →
> Witnesses can see humans in costumes/space-suits/pressure-suits etc. >>752 →
> Witnesses can https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareidolia indistinct objects into cultural expectations. (Lights = Ghost V2 Rockets from the Soviets)
> Investigators can suffer cultural bias https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghost_rockets#Swedish_military_opinion
> Investigators can leave reality behind: https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/John_Keel
> Evil humans can weaponise hallucinations during human created UFO events (EMF, Drugs). >>121954 → >>29447 → (CIA)
* Man and the Sun together are producing UFOs and alien reports.
> If all events can have earthly logical plus natural space explanations then no imaginary space alien civilisations are needed. You can't solve a mystery by using a myth.
79 replies and 72 files omitted.
Anonymous
m0WOG
?
No.123685
yay.jpg
>“but it is noteworthy that in 1872 the compensation comes from the greater number of observations made in the winter months, in which, the eruptions prevail in the east, while in summer they still prevail in the west as in the aforementioned years” – https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1876MmSSI...5A..61T/abstract (Secchi)

The sun rotates every 28 days. There should be no fixed orientation (relative to the stars) for solar ejections. Why doesn't it rotate? Two possibilities exist, the sun has some component of itself that does not rotate (for example the ejected material is somehow suspended above the sun, radiation pressure?) or material is streaming into the sun over an extended period.

For the later, it could be the infall of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biela%27s_Comet#Disintegration fragments which come from the November/Andromidids direction, it is therefore most visible in July when the impact zone is on the edge of the sun, it should also be visible in January but Winter weather obstructs viewing. Also it is hitting near solar max for maximum churn.

The Earth passed into the stream in November 1872. But the stream existed before November 1872, but would have been after November 1871 or we would have reported that date. This explanation appears to contradict the Solar Storm of May 1869 explanation. But there is no reason why both events could not happen together. In fact the infall of Comet Biela is a part of the process of the sun eating space rocks and shitting metal. However I have no data that suggest that debris from Biela breakup fell into the sun.

Suspending metal ions in space with solar radiation pressure:

>Another, visually dramatic, example of radiation pressure is the formation of cometary tails, in which dust particles released by cometary nuclei are pushed by solar radiation into characteristic trailing patterns.
https://www.britannica.com/science/light/Radiation-pressure

Solar Radiation pressure causes acceleration of particles away from the sun:

>Direct photography has shown that the material in the tail of a comet is travelling outwards from the head, always away from the sun, with a velocity that is continually increasing. This proves that the material is moving under the influence of a continually acting force emanating from the direction of the sun, and not under some momentarily acting force such as might be supposed to arise from an explosion in the comet’s head; for in this latter case the
material would be driven out with a constantly diminishing, instead of an increasing, velocity.
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1943JRASC..37..177M/abstract

Solar Radiation and Solar Cycles:

>Levels of solar radiation and ejection of solar material, the number and size of sunspots, solar flares, and coronal loops all exhibit a synchronized fluctuation, from active to quiet to active again, with a period of 11 years.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_cycle

Heliospheric Current Sheet and Solar Cycles:

I also suspect the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heliospheric_current_sheet is like a garden water sprinkler, it appears to be curved flow but it actually radial flow. HCS also rises and falls with the solar cycle and so it also radiates pressure onto the metal parked in space by radiation pressure and pushes it towards the Earth in a cycle following, but lagging, the solar cycle (due to journey time).

This theory continues to be supported by the data. I think that completes my mind dump. Now my mind can be cleared to do some programming to make the better mega-chart. Yay!
Anonymous
m0WOG
?
No.123692
>>123682

Solar Radiation Pressure and metal.

>churned up the metal silt layer at the bottom
>ejected material is somehow suspended above the sun, radiation pressure

These two ideas are contradictory? Does the metal float or sink?

>On the possibility of the emission of high-speed atoms from the sun and stars (1926)
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1926MNRAS..86..459M/abstract
is a good introduction to how atoms are accelerated from the sun.

>Solar radiation pressure as a mechanism of acceleration of atoms and first ions with low ionization potentials (2015)
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015SoSyR..49..139S/abstract
explains what levels of ionisation of an atom are needed for the sunlight to push atoms, and whether this is enough to overcome the suns gravity. The TL;DR is the following (where I means un-ionised, II means lost one electron, III means lost 2 electrons, etc):

I II III more Ratio of light pressure over gravity pull
Si No No No No
Fe No Yes No No 0.11-2.5
Mg Yes Yes Yes No 1.4-13.7

Fe needs to have lost one electron. Mg can be pushed away from the sun without ionisation or with up to 2 electrons lost. When fully ionised the metal ions can fall into the sun unaffected by the sun light. When ionised 2 or more times the light needed is ultra-violet or higher, since the sun produces less of this those atoms can fall into the sun. The spectral lines of Fe and Mg seen on the sun in the 1870s are from the metal atoms having almost all their electrons back. Therefore they are prone to being ejected by sun light and it is a simple task to gather the remaining electrons in space or in the Earth atmosphere. Mg can have 13.7 time more sunlight push over gravity pull. Both gravity and sunlight fall with the square of the distance so this ratio applies at all distances from the sun.

The acceleration causes can cease because the movement of the atom causes a Doppler shift in the frequency of light hitting it from the atoms frame of reference. It is possible for the change in frequency needed to not be available (that frequency may have been absorbed by other atoms in the sun, or the sun produces less of that frequency) and so it can end up in a "radiation frequency vallee" which causes it to reach a fixed speed.

Since Mg + sunlight = thrust, and Si is diamagnetic both of these like leaving the sun. The Fe has gravity and magnetism pulling and in one ionised state light pushing. For a metal blob leaving the sun some of its metal is like an anchor and some is like a solar sail. This is perhaps the reason for the slow travel times for the blobs and the radial path.

Can RADAR push UFOs?

The above paper states that the spectral line of an atom is the frequency that pushes the atom, in some cases, the other cases are "free" electrons being jostled this later case doesn't push the atom much.

With the above understanding I sought to discover if RADAR can push UFOs as was suggested by Albert Budden in his book Psychic UFOs https://www.amazon.com/Psychic-Close-Encounters-Ufo-Files/dp/0713727993/ref=sr_1_2 where he proposed UFOs cause hallucinations. I tried to obtain RADAR frequencies but it turns out the term RADAR is a description of what it does and not a frequency and the frequency ranges used vary significantly. However https://www.radartutorial.eu/07.waves/Waves%20and%20Frequency%20Ranges.en.html 2nd image has airborne radar at 10Ghz. The top image says this is about 3cm wavelength, which = 300,000,000 Angstroms. Going https://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/ASD/lines_form.html and using the range 200000000 to 400000000 Å (Ångströms) produced a surprising result:

...
D I 302 436 000
H I 302 478 400

D I assume means deuterium and H is hydrogen. They respond to 3.024cm wavelengths and aircraft RADAR is about 3cm. I don't know if this means RADAR can push hydrogen but it is possible. Web searching shows that this question is too obscure. If we consider what the consequences are, if true, we could have a situation where a plasmoid filled with solar hydrogen, which is a natural hydrogen balloon being chased by an aircraft using radar, would be pushing the UFO away from the aircraft. Since the plasmoid could be light it would accelerate away from the plane in a seemingly intelligent manner. The plane is doing the equivalent of a dog chasing its tail. Also military and airport radar could act as barriers to plasmoid travel and as the plasmoid approached the airport or military base they could come to a halt, then reverse direction and accelerate away. Throw in some pretty lights from the plasma, reflecting off dust and moisture in the air and and electrical interference and you have:

>Aliens have deactivated British and US nuclear missiles, say US military pilots
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/ufo/8026971/Aliens-have-deactivated-British-and-US-nuclear-missiles-say-US-military-pilots.html


Anonymous
m0WOG
?
No.123694
main-qimg-36a5a646fe2cc17e9c0f027d544ada92.png
Do natural solar magnetic bottles make the cigar shaped motherships? pic.

Is the apparent release of "scout craft" from "motherships" the leaking of metal plasma? Which then gains electrons and becomes new plasmoids?
Anonymous
m0WOG
?
No.123746
123747 123748 123755
Afternon
Do your friends know if aircraft radar can push a hydrogen balloon? For example a weather balloon?
Anonymous
xhRMw
?
No.123747
123756 123825
>>123746
I just have to guess here as I have not looked into it at all. I would think it would be hard to do that as the wind force as an example that would probably be several magnitudes stronger (said mildly). But there would probably be a tiny force exerted on the ballon (if the material the ballon in made of is reflective), but I think it will be so negligable that it won't registrer (other than at the radar station listening to the return of the radar signal). On the other hand I've heard you can kill birds using radar (lots of birds when running big radars on full power) but I guess this is more to do with birds absorbing the energy instead of reflecting it back.
Anonymous
GOtVS
?
No.123748
123755 123825
electromagnetic-spectrum-png-highres.png
>>123746
>aircraft radar
Absolutely not.
A radar is an antenna emitting electromagnetic radiation in the microwave range. Such radiation doesn't have mass (at least a measurable one) and consequently hasn't a kinetic effect.
Anonymous
PrHMf
?
No.123755
123825
>>123746
>>123748
Electromagnetic radiation can make the vanes in a Crookes radiometer spin just from imparted energy, but their mass is very tiny and they are in a vacuum bottle.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crookes_radiometer
Anonymous
GOtVS
?
No.123756
>>123747
>On the other hand I've heard you can kill birds using radar (lots of birds when running big radars on full power) but I guess this is more to do with birds absorbing the energy instead of reflecting it back.
I heard a rumor from several not related people; those men working close to electromagnetic radiation usually procreate only girls.
Anonymous
m0WOG
?
No.123825
123956 123957
shestakova2015.pdf
>>123748
>Electromagnetic radiation can be viewed in terms of particles rather than waves; these particles are known as photons. Photons do not have a rest-mass; however, photons are never at rest (they move at the speed of light) and acquire a momentum nonetheless
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_pressure

>>123747
>>123755
>Electromagnetic radiation can make the vanes in a Crookes radiometer spin just from imparted energy, but their mass is very tiny and they are in a vacuum bottle.
BUT what if a magnetic bottle plasmoid is a natural Crookes radiometer? Still wind should be a far more effective pusher.
What if RADAR helped keep the hydrogen ionised or heated? And then the magnetic and low pressure plasma effects then led to movement?

>When an atom is being expelled under radiation-pressure, radiation-pressure exceeds gravity, and the atom is being accelerated away from the star. ... The rough estimate made below indicates that the limiting velocity acquired will be of the order of 1600 km/sec. in the case of the sun; and of a similar order of magnitude for the stars in general.
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1926MNRAS..86..459M/abstract

>Table 1 gives the results of the calculations of β for atoms with a zero radial velocity.
>The value βmax corresponds to atoms with high Doppler velocities.
>Hydrogen β: 1.0 (equalibrium)
>Hydrogen βmax: 1.3 (overcomes gravity of the sun)
Paper attached.

Light-weight metal bubbles of hydrogen?
Anonymous
m0WOG
?
No.123826
What would hydrogen do with the RADAR energy it absorbs? That's the bottom line question.
Anonymous
m0WOG
?
No.123830
GMS-UFO.chart.png
Yay, progress on the computer generated chart. Zoom in and you can see the number values, zoom out for the overview. Anti-aliasing is off to reduce file size. Now I can scribble connections all over it.
Anonymous
GOtVS
?
No.123956
123957 123959
f96.jpg
>>123825
>Electromagnetic radiation can be viewed in terms of particles rather than waves; these particles are known as photons.
Before to go any further I would like to drop a kinda monkey wrench.
Do you know that physics is based mostly in theories and speculations?
That the duality of particles and waves is an imperfect explanation and nothing is definitely settled?
Anonymous
OKBju
?
No.123957
123958
>>123825
>>123956
"If you think you understand quantum mechanics, you don't understand quantum mechanics" –Richard Feynman

I read this book in high school and it gives a good general grounding. Might be a little basic depending on your past studies but it may fill in holes. https://www.amazon.com/101-Quantum-Questions-About-World/dp/0674066073
Anonymous
GOtVS
?
No.123958
124020
>>123957
>"If you think you understand quantum mechanics, you don't understand quantum mechanics"
Of course, it is a niche more related to witchcraft than real physics.
Anonymous
NOMjY
?
No.123959
123960
>>123956
>Do you know that physics is based mostly in theories and speculations?
As a professor told me, never anybody have saw a molecule, an atom or electron. Everything in the books is just elaborated speculation backed with logic, math, and experimentation trying to make sense of the matter's manifestations.
Anonymous
m0WOG
?
No.123960
>>123959
We have maths theories for why electrons and spectral line happen. It only works for hydrogen... :|
Anonymous
m0WOG
?
No.124009
124010 124027
srep15689-f3--with_solar_cycle.jpg
GMS-UFO.chart--sample.png
Thorium2.png
thorium_mass-abundance.png
I know what happened.

It was the Carrington Event of August and September 1859. Pic 1 shows that the sun ramped up activity harder in 1855-1867 Solar Cycle than it had for centuries. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep15689/figures/3 Scientists define a geomagnetic storm as anything over -50nT. Intense storm is at -100nT. Super-storm is at -250nT. Maximum recorded storms are about -700nT.

>On September 1–2, 1859, the largest recorded geomagnetic storm occurred. From August 28 until September 2, 1859, numerous sunspots and solar flares were observed on the Sun, with the largest flare on September 1. This is referred to as the Solar storm of 1859 or the Carrington Event. It can be assumed that a massive coronal mass ejection (CME) was launched from the Sun and reached the Earth within eighteen hours—a trip that normally takes three to four days. The horizontal field was reduced by 1600 nT as recorded by the Colaba Observatory. It is estimated that Dst would have been approximately −1760 nT.
-- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geomagnetic_storm#Occurrences

Carrington Event was -1760nT!

This happened in August/September. This is one of the reasons for the summer bias in the UFO reports for the decades that follow. The other reason is nicer weather, more sunlight. Start at the bottom of pic 2 and follow the August|September line upwards and you will see the UFO peaks fall evenly on either side. This is the Carrington Event metal fanning out and continuing to haemorrhage over the decades as the sun re-churns it each solar cycle.

The Carrington Event matches the Grand Solar Cycle. The date matches the UFO central dates.

At the Maximum of Solar Cycle 11 in 1870 the sun managed to churn up Thorium. Thorium has an atomic mass of 232. This occurred in July and since https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thorium#Formation is both heavy AND rare this is quite an achievement and signifies how agitated the sun had become internally.

Pic 3 is me piecing together the history of the metallic sun. You can see the bias towards summer (Earth tilt means less atmospheric thickness scattering spectral lines, also less humidity/clouds) and Aug|Sep (Carrington Event). On the right you can see metallic eruptions started high and was falling.

Everything points to the Carrington Event as the beginning, and solar cycle churn as the continuation.
Anonymous
m0WOG
?
No.124010
Thorium.png
>>124009
>At the Maximum of Solar Cycle 11 in 1870 the sun managed to churn up Thorium.
https://archive.org/details/ComptesRendusAcademieDesSciences0071/page/n303/mode/2up
Anonymous
GOtVS
?
No.124020
124022 124024
parallel-universes.png
>>123958
>it is a niche more related to witchcraft than real physics.
I don't want to derail the thread, but to enrich it with a brief detour.
Notice how Luciferian thinking is taking over science when quantum theory affirms that the mere presence of the observer alters the mechanics of physics.

>Physicist Says Parallel Universes Definitely Exist And We May Soon Explore Them
>Theoretical physicist Sean Carroll expressed that clues in the small-scale structure of the universe point to the existence of numerous parallel worlds.
>The shocking comments were made on the Jeff Rogan Experience (JRE) podcast last year. Carroll says that the fact that tiny particles like electrons and photons don’t have one set location in the universe is evidence that there are many parallel universes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_ZsDBMPQMI
https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/physicist-says-parallel-universes-definitely-exist-and-we-may-soon-explore-them
Anonymous
Q8vr/
?
No.124022
124023 124024
>>124020
I was just listening to a program the other day talking about this sort of thing in relation to CERN. Go to 52:00
https://thegodcast.libsyn.com/the-godcast-episode-102-moralistic-therapeutic-deism-the-theological-blue-pill
Anonymous
GOtVS
?
No.124023
>>124022
Fascinating. I downloaded it to keep it for reference.
Anonymous
m0WOG
?
No.124024
124025
Somewhere in the Skies Podcast - This Monday, we're going cosmic with Leslie Kean and Diana Walsh Pasulka!-1233905602218352640.mp4
>>124020
>>124022
https://twitter.com/SomewhereSkies/status/1233905602218352640?s=09
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leslie_Kean

We are still primitives making myths.
Anonymous
GOtVS
?
No.124025
124026
>>124024
>primitives making myths
If I translate well what you are meaning: "religious people believing fairy tales".
Is this correct?
Anonymous
m0WOG
?
No.124026
>>124025
That is a subset of it. Our egos don't like having no answers, we will fill in the void with ANYTHING to make ourselves feel less stupid.
Anonymous
m0WOG
?
No.124027
circular-grid-day-1896-1984-bigger.png
>>124009
>Carrington Event

Another visual for the Carrington event. It would seem that the Carrington explosion sent a shock wave into the sun. This fractured the deeply settled metal and sprayed it into to space.

I'm 100% in on blaming the sun now. I need to complete some of the missing solar history and then put together a document.
Anonymous
m0WOG
?
No.124091
124100
Pilot captures UFO, was anything else found on this-jd9as9upoyk41.mp4

Anonymous
GOtVS
?
No.124100
>>124091
Impressive.
Anonymous
GOtVS
?
No.124829
124830
the_twilight_will_rise_by_blackligerth-d9mzuae.jpg
Where's Vril?
Anonymous
9HSvU
?
No.124830
>>124829
Maybe Corona-chan got to him?
Anonymous
VvN4h
?
No.126139
my-little-mlp-art-1020691.jpeg
>missing faggot
Ahem.
19 days without Sun's debris posting.
Anonymous
m0WOG
?
No.126808
131857
I am well and pleasantly distracted by a woman for a while. I will be back when it all calms down :) The research and eventual document will occur.
Anonymous
GOtVS
?
No.126809
7df51a812c096d1444f9e3ff811fa4f4.png
>>126808
Yay!

Anonymous
3zYg/
?
No.126812
>>126808
Bost bobs
Anonymous
GOtVS
?
No.127158
128687
Multiple UFO's Filmed Moving Across the Moonlight.mp4
Pasta:
>Multiple UFO's Filmed Moving Across the Moonlight
>Occurred on May 18, 2019 / Moscow, Russia
>Info from Licensor: "Filmed at Nikon P 900. Before this, a UFO saw against the moon many times through binoculars and telescopes, but I shot it on the video for the first time, so I wasn’t very surprised when I saw three as I've seen 4 UFO's several times, they flew in different directions and slightly different speeds.
>I have been observing the moon for over 20 years and I understand the height of the objects that I see, these objects are at least at an altitude of 500 km."
Anonymous
9ca01ab
?
No.128687
1588278710.png
>>127158
Magnificent video! Very convincing.

---

Turns out my lady friend also knows Spanish, French and Italian and has offered to help with translations. Research is on hold until I move. Time frame unknown. Probably months. You have the main data points all the rest is just fleshing out the history, and adding supporting references.

Mystery still exists with how the metal ions clump back together but this looks to be natural magnetic bottling caused by the magnetic wave fronts from the sun.
Anonymous
9ca01ab
?
No.130825
São Paulo, Brazil (5/23/2020)
https://youtu.be/feSSIIeHzi4

The reason for the location is potentially because it is at the lowest point of the Earths magnetic field. >>123194 Pic#4
Anonymous
9ca01ab
?
No.130826
130827
Russia - Moscow, 04/30/2020
https://youtu.be/2raYClessxQ

3 black balls in formation Poland 20 05 2020
https://youtu.be/ACYO6G9YGU4

Pomona, California, May 11
https://youtu.be/sjnEMYA7GFM

Moreno Valley, California, May 16th
https://youtu.be/vMN9ApOhUn8

Yorkshire, UK, May 14
https://youtu.be/PS7GKX65DMY

São Paulo, Brazil, May 11
https://youtu.be/vXCtyLgATXM

Quebec, Canada, May 11. Nice and clear seemingly natural plasma metal blob.
https://youtu.be/UzzhClCALjI

No details.
https://streamable.com/o/dakq39

Teotihuacán, Mexico. 2nd May
https://v.redd.it/jmwtiho6vqw41/DASH_720
Anonymous
5114b63
?
No.130827
>>130826
>first video
Definitely balloons.
Anonymous
5114b63
?
No.131857
df.png
Screenshot_20200629_004504.png
>>126808
Ahem.
It has been 3 months missing faggot.

>A Decade of Sun
>As of June 2020, NASA’s Solar Dynamics Observatory — SDO — has now been watching the Sun non-stop for over a full decade. From its orbit in space around the Earth, SDO has gathered 425 million high-resolution images of the Sun, amassing 20 million gigabytes of data over the past 10 years. This information has enabled countless new discoveries about the workings of our closest star and how it influences the solar system.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3QQQu7QLoM
Anonymous
5114b63
?
No.132040
008451.png
0008452.jpeg
>Has E.T. Gone Home?
>There were just over 3,700 reported sightings in 2018 and in 2019, there were 6,889. So far in 2020, 4,688 UFO sightings have been reported.
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/has-et-gone-home
Anonymous
a9077b3
?
No.132647
>4 months since last post
Has Vril run his last circle cycle?
I hope not.
Anonymous
15f863f
?
No.132739
144935
080705.png
212622.png
This is for Vril. I hope that faggot is still around.

>The Moon is made of plasma
>Wanna know why we haven't been (back) to the Moon?
>I have an idea why.... Hopefully this helps clear up this gigantic fraud perpetrated on the WORLD since the '69 faked NASA lunar landing with astro-NOTS Armstrong & Aldrin... There are some very odd videos out there of crazy eyed Buzz Aldrin giving some very less than convincing responses to skeptics asking if he ever stepped foot on the moon!
>Listen to this scientist tells us NO ONE WILL EVER LAND ON THE MOON because of its composition... He posits that the Lunar entity is made up of PLASMA.
>I tend to agree with him... He further debunks Einstein and all Gravitational theories related to the moon! The video footage of a moon rise at the end also (IMO) supports the hypothesis that the moon is actually NOT a solid rock but PLASMA in substance! (therefore you cannot 'land on it' as it were)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/iPTD4QHgHDbo/
Anonymous
5114b63
?
No.132889
929.png
/VX/ calling Vril to review this post.

>The Sun is a converter no light years in Space
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xkvmU8Lv_Ic
The speaker is Eric P. Dollard
Anonymous
90fcaca
?
No.144935
144937 144938 144939
I have neglected this duty for some time now. That was, necessarily, for the best as a certain health trouble has not aided me in the slightest.

>>132739
The moon is not (((plasma))). Any retard with a telescope and is above 80IQ (the minimum required to be considered more intelligent than a hamster) is able to able colocate, anaylyze, and understand this. The flat earth assumption syndicates, majority kike owned just as the (((AYYYLIEN))) and (((BIGFOOT R REEL GOY))) groups continue to fall flat.

#1: the initial landing sequence is fake. Stanley Kubrick was paid well over 1 billion Jewnited Estates shekels and 'given freedumb' to operate dozens of more-than- Olymic sized swimming pools, not including the 15-20 still classified ones, specifically for "training astroNOTS on how to handle lunar landings." Does that not strike you as mysteriously, insanely odd?
#2: Stanley Kubrick was paid 380,000,000 shekel-dollars, to be paid for over the next 30 years, to establish a, quote: "interior mockup of the lunar surface for training exercises", end quote. This by the way occurred in 1957, ending in 1987. Can you guess which amerimutt program scoincided at the latter end of Kubrick's era? Trick question! If you said both "Star Wars" and "Space Force", then you would be right.
#3: whom filmed the lunar landing? Why was there a production screen stage in the background when the astroNOTS were jumping around on the "moon"? Where are the skid marks on the moon? Where was the film crew responsible for that (((historic))) event? Why was there only a 0.3 second differential between the "lunar landing party" and the "lunar command"? Oh, maybe because it only took 0.3 seconds to transmit from Commiefornia to Florida. You see, it would have taken 90-95 seconds to transmit from low earth orbit to Florida CCC (Central Command & Control) using era specific technology platforms.
#4: what did Stanely Kubrick do when he was accused of both faking the moon landings, and that the moon landing could not have happened given the terribly inarticulate scifi-babble used by nasa? He defended his claims, in the Jew-S Navy's Commiefornia military court (succint to the Coast Guard court). During this he was unable to use 'evidence' created from Jollywood filmography, but was able to prove that the moon did indeed exist and, theoretically, could be landed on... had the technology been capable of doing so at a cost of 1 million Jewnited Estates shekels per pound at launch.

There are no astronauts. As it stands, the current (((international space station))) WILL be struck by 11 to 49 solar storms, every 24 hours. All electronics would fail, no matter how "hardened" they are against electromagnetic pulses. Especially ones that strike at 200,000,000 volts and 40,000,000 amperes.

'''If'''' the moon were '''plasma''', such would be visible on both the infrared and magnet spectra. So far, our moon has remained static, if unusual, for the past 3,400+ years.
Anonymous
90fcaca
?
No.144936
144937 144939
>>123673
Hm. That is curious. Carl Sagan, Isaac Asimov, Martin Gardner, and (((Randi))) at the time were solely interested in discovering that elusive 'if' of sapient life occurring away from this deity-forsaken world. Philip Klass, however, is a not-so-well-known La Sia shill muppet on their payroll under the 'crisis filmer' tag. Randi drank the Kool-Aid too often, too quickly. His skepticism faltered. Money became his driving force of trusting the good goyim principles: "always swallow the dogshit we put out, goy, because (((we))) are never wrong!" Randi was also a major proponent of the IFEL, that is: the International Foundation (searching) for Extraterrestrial Life. Few records remain of its' existence. At that time the IFEL was known by 29 other names, as well as sponsored by.. the same number of governments: the Twenty Nine Eyes. Forget the Five Eyes and Eleven Eyes, the Dos-Nueve have been in effect since 1946. Should any particularly indoctrinated laissez faire fool think that Dos-Nueve does not exist, merely take a look at how many countries have been toppled and become banana republics, all the while 'gratefully accepting' massive, sprawling military bases throughout their interiors and exteriors.
Anonymous
64c15d1
?
No.144937
144939 145132
>>144935
>>144936
v-v-Vril???
Anonymous
fbb46b7
?
No.144938
145132
>>144935
>The flat earth assumption
There's a lot of faggots with very compelling arguments in favour.
Anonymous
c54200d
?
No.144939
145132
B0B331DE4E8494F2F75BF10A58EB56BE-352754.png
>>144935
>>144936
>>144937
Even if not... In any case, hello frien!
Anonymous
90fcaca
?
No.145132
145135
>>144937
Not Vril, he refers to me by a certain name. You will notice my specific typing style from the previous thread and throughout much of this one. That name is correct, to a point, yet no longer adequate enough to go by. Others may call me what they desire. I keep neither labels, titles, nothing to tie nor bind me.

>>144938
Compelling, or simply trainloads of wild-flung shit to keep the goyim guessing and happy in their unwillfully medicated state? Sowing division amongst what ought be a single people is called a diversion. In this instance, it is best called a plan.

>>144939
Same as the first anon. I've kicked around for a while.
Anonymous
64c15d1
?
No.145135
flat earth.png
>>145132
>Compelling, or simply trainloads of wild-flung shit to keep the goyim guessing and happy in their unwillfully medicated state?
I would say that the multiple experiments with lasers from shore to shore have shaken my belief in a round Earth. Then, everything comes down to narrative versus experimental facts.