>>1173I find much of their art to be rather aesthetically pleasing
furfaggotry is a disease
youre an active cause of societal decay
>>1172>we have a mod who is a furfagwhen are you going to help save the world and gas/hang yourself?
I really don't see much difference betw furfaggots and horsefuckers, except that the latter has a show to rally around.
My only problem with furfags is that they get too defensive. Look at any of those stupid "furry cringe" videos and there will be a shit load of dislikes and furrys saying "why do you H00mans hate us, we don't hurt anyone?" That's why I got on board with the folks from /mlp/ when /mlpol/ happened, because they didn't try to "justify" their infatuation with ponies. Also the porn is good. (Pic semi related, just happened to have it.)
>>1166I dont know anymore, they did kill /b/ back in 2006, august if i remember correctly, but nowadays you need all the friendos you can get. Ill still F40PH the shit out of the occasionall furfag thread on /b/, but i guess it'll just be another anti shill thing to scroll past
>>1234>>1234You know what? No. I changed my mind. Furfaggotry lures in tumblrfaggotry and cunts rolling in and taking over. Those cunts at wikifur were so worried about the idea of /b/ destroying wikifur and thus losing half the yiff in the interwebz back in the day, that they inserted agents as mods and got moot to enforce no raids, leading to old /b/ revolting.
Tl;Dr, furfaggotry brings the worst kinds of degeneracy. Yiff in hell
>>1166Little known fun fact - As fans of a show with talking animals we are technically furries by definition - and that's even before factoring in our lust for horse pussy. I never liked them either because of their drawings of smug-ass wolf characters but at the same time I don't have it in me to be this much of a fag - even anonymously to post stuff like this:
>>1178>>1182>>1186>>1235after fapping to the shit we post here. You niggers are very much in denial I'm afraid.
>>1245we may be in denial, but at least we aren't as bad as you who accepts it.
>>1249"I'm delusional so I'm better than you".
that's just dumb. Like it or not if you like horse pussy you are a hardcore furry. You can use the label "horsefucker" if you like but nobody outside of the horsefucker community is going to see a difference.
>>1252tfw I am one of the few who don't clop
>>1251>hardcore furryYou fucking wish, you ultimate cancer.
>>1260the fuck are you doing here then normie?
>>1262discussing politics, cartoon horses, and fapping up a storm. fucking furfags, do you have to have it spelled out for you?
>>1263>fapping up a stormYes. To cartoon horses. Which makes you a furry. You need it spelled out for you - not me.
>>1264you're the one trying to drag us respectable people into your group of disgustings. just accept the fact that not everyone who faps to cartoon horses is a furfaggot.
>>1264But horse porn isn't anthropomorphic (or at least it shouldn't be), whereas furries are by definition anthropomorphic. So it's not furry
>>1266Maybe its gateway bestiality? :/
>>1267It think it may very well be. I know I would probably have sex with an IRL horse, whereas I wouldn't before mlp
>>1266giving any human characteristics - be they physical or otherwise - to an animal or inanimate object falls under anthropomorphization. The look in Twilight's eyes for example in that pic you posted suggests "fuck me" - which is something humans do when they want to fuck. It's - in a sense - as anthropormorphic as any furry drawing.
>>1267>>1268Which I would think technically separates clopping from bestiality.
>>1270by that logic then, masturbating to any sentient nonhuman makes you a furry. I'm not going to even bother pointing out all those flaws.
>>1271I don't make the rules fag. Your arguments just come down to "I don't want to be associated with furries - so much so that I would rather be thought of as a zooiphile" and that doesn't refute anything I'm saying.
>>1272zoophiles are better than furries though, why would you want to be associated with something so terrible?
>>1272New guy here
Being a "furry" has all sorts of negative connotations like fursuits and conventions. Just because you desperately want furries and horsefuckers to be the same thing doesn't mean that anything you declare furry is furry. While horsefuckers and the furries may be similar in some ways, there is a distinct divide between the two "cultures". I almost agree that the porn is the same, but any furry will have a tantrum if you tell them their fandom is defined by their porn. And you saying "I don't make the rules" when your clearly pulling "rules" out of your ass doesn't help either.
>>1251What if I want to fuck a real horse?
>>1245Don't use the fap material, purely Anti-Shill Defence
Ok occasionally the Anthro stuff if im drunk enough
>>1276Oh and thats Anthro as in Hominoid MLP not full on Bipedal animal furfags
>>1274>Being a "furry" has all sorts of negative connotations So does being a fan of mlp. It's why nor/mlp/eople are such cunts about being called "bronies".
>Just because you desperately want furries and horsefuckers to be the same thing doesn't mean that anything you declare furry is furry. I don't have to want it because they are. Splitting hairs on this is like tumblrites making up their own sexual orientations.
>While horsefuckers and the furries may be similar in some ways, there is a distinct divide between the two "cultures". I almost agree that the porn is the same, but any furry will have a tantrum if you tell them their fandom is defined by their porn.Right. They're defined by being fans of shows and movies and shit that feature talking animals. Just like bronies / horsefuckers.
>And you saying "I don't make the rules" when your clearly pulling "rules" out of your ass doesn't help either.Google anthropomorphization. I'm not making shit up and as I've said, to normies there is no difference anyways. I just think it's important to have self-awareness and the only reason I'm getting push-back on this is because /mlp/ users don't have any. The board was only good for a couple months until it filled up with pissy elitists.
We done here now? There's only so many ways I know how to reiterate "look up what anthropomorphization actually means you fucking retards".
>>1278But we aren't normies, and we all know that furries and horsefuckers are much more alike than they are different. However, I still think it is wrong to classify horsefuckers/bronies as the same as furries, simply because the connotations of each term are quite different. While each connotation may be "negative" they are still different. Not all negative things are the same.
>>1278And yes, I understand what anthro is. The talking horses are anthro. However, there are different levels of anthro, as demonstrated by the Neko anime stuff vs the actual furry stuff. The talking horses in the show are a different type of thing than whatever picture OP posted, as they do not look very humanized. Nevertheless, there will always be overlap in the fan work, but this doesn't change what the original designs of the ponies was meant to look like.
>>1270It's a very different type of anthropomorphism. The defining feature of the furry is that is bipedal and upright, besides intelligence and the ability to talk, and sometimes hands. Clop is quadrepedal. The ponies are very bestial, with only intelligence and the ability to talk anthropomorphizing them. Ponies are not furries (although you can make ponies into furries), nor is clop (necessarily) furry. Clop I would also say is more zooaphilic than furry porn.
>>1280I think we agree here(?)
>>1281I agree that's it's TECHNICALLY anthro, but I don't agree that that automatically puts us under the giant umbrella term of "furries". That's basically what I'm arguing.
Did anybody save the infographic that explains the trinity between "Anons", "bronies" and "furries" in the /mlp/ fandom?
>>1268Don't even think about it: you'll get yourself killed.
>>1285notice how the anons are at the top of the triangle, as we're the best part of it.