Could /mlpol/ Benefit From A Blue Pony Board?
Posters in this community have brought of various ways to make the site more attractive to horsefuckers and content creators. One reccomended idea has been to introduce a blue board for pony content.
Is this idea worth trying?
What could the benefits be?
Express your thoughts.
Continued from the discussion in the Roe v Wade Thread >>>/mlpol/344423 →
/qa/ - Questions and Answers
Keeping the community together by giving you a voice
File (): 0357C9DAEC769FBCA8417C6EB7230E75-406517.png (397.0 KB, 1197x957, 4b4815ab17083d18da8d6d7ea85a6718f7efb8aed4cb1931eb401c4e934f3f1f.png)
184 replies and 98 files omitted.
>>6720
If I understand correctly, the purpose of it would be to increase traffic to all boards, as horsefuckers would have a place to create more content peacefully, while also using the red board for red things.
>The traffic is not high enough for that to be practical
Our traffick wouldn't decrease because of it though. i hear this argument on a lot of topics, but the "we're too small" idea really underestimates the potential of this community. I also don't think /mlpol/ should deny ourselves opportunities to improve just because we're 'too small'. Smaller pony boards exist that get along just fine.
If I understand correctly, the purpose of it would be to increase traffic to all boards, as horsefuckers would have a place to create more content peacefully, while also using the red board for red things.
>The traffic is not high enough for that to be practical
Our traffick wouldn't decrease because of it though. i hear this argument on a lot of topics, but the "we're too small" idea really underestimates the potential of this community. I also don't think /mlpol/ should deny ourselves opportunities to improve just because we're 'too small'. Smaller pony boards exist that get along just fine.
File (): 7B10F4938766659ED1C9143FB95C16C7-83256.png (81.3 KB, 880x538, 6r5hz8b.png)
>>6721
>as horsefuckers would have a place to create more content peacefully
>peacefully
Care to explain yourself.
>as horsefuckers would have a place to create more content peacefully
>peacefully
Care to explain yourself.
>>6721
>as horsefuckers would have a place to create more content peacefully
>newfag
/mlpol/ is already a board of peace and friendship
>as horsefuckers would have a place to create more content peacefully
>newfag
/mlpol/ is already a board of peace and friendship
File (): 2A4CCEB703E440B616317A301D62C19C-1188335.png (1.1 MB, 3000x2000, 1651795559736.png)
Guess I'll throw my two cents in.
I don't necessarily object to the idea, and it would certainly be easy enough to add an additional board. I'm skeptical that it would really bring in more users to the site proper; seems like what we would mainly be doing is providing a bunker board for /mlp/, so basically just becoming the new /pone/. This isn't objectionable in itself, but it seems like if everyone new who comes in has no interest in the political side and stays on the SFW board, all it's going to do is resegregate /pol/ and /mlp/ into separate boards again, which kind of defeats the purpose of /mlpol/. I guess my personal view is that the whole thing seems a bit unnecessary, and that if people want more pony threads there's nothing stopping them from posting more pony threads.
That said, I guess there's a lot about the horsefucker side of things that I may not necessarily understand, since I wasn't really involved in /mlp/ prior to coming here. If ponyfags legitimately feel like they're being crowded out by the political threads and would post more if they had a second ponies-only board, it's not something I'm adamantly opposed to and would be willing to give it a try.
tl;dr, I'm not against the idea if that's what people want, but I must also confess that I don't entirely understand why this is an issue.
I don't necessarily object to the idea, and it would certainly be easy enough to add an additional board. I'm skeptical that it would really bring in more users to the site proper; seems like what we would mainly be doing is providing a bunker board for /mlp/, so basically just becoming the new /pone/. This isn't objectionable in itself, but it seems like if everyone new who comes in has no interest in the political side and stays on the SFW board, all it's going to do is resegregate /pol/ and /mlp/ into separate boards again, which kind of defeats the purpose of /mlpol/. I guess my personal view is that the whole thing seems a bit unnecessary, and that if people want more pony threads there's nothing stopping them from posting more pony threads.
That said, I guess there's a lot about the horsefucker side of things that I may not necessarily understand, since I wasn't really involved in /mlp/ prior to coming here. If ponyfags legitimately feel like they're being crowded out by the political threads and would post more if they had a second ponies-only board, it's not something I'm adamantly opposed to and would be willing to give it a try.
tl;dr, I'm not against the idea if that's what people want, but I must also confess that I don't entirely understand why this is an issue.
>>6724
Then what if we made the NSFW aspect of it the gimmick and just made a red board? Or do we already have the /mlpol/ board for that?
Then what if we made the NSFW aspect of it the gimmick and just made a red board? Or do we already have the /mlpol/ board for that?
>>6722
It wasn't my idea, I just agree with it somewhat, so I can't explain it entirely. Follow the post linked in the OP and you can see a mass-reply to some of the posts in the Roe v Wade thread that discussed the topic. I'd prefer it if that poster argued for the proposition instead.
From what I understand, some users feel like /mlpol/ is as it stands a lot like /pol/ without GR15, instead of a hybrid of both boards. Some users thought /mlp/ users who were friendly with /mlpol/ or formerly used it would be more attracted to the site if they had a SFW pony board, where they could talk about cartoon horse escapism without always being blackpilled with grim headlines about the death of the white race, and also without flags or IDs, like /mlp/.
Then I guess there's also the idea of the idea that SFW boards exist for a reason, and that having porn in the same place as regular posting might not necessarily be the best for discussion.
>>6723
I have religiously visited this board every single day, without fail, since it was created April 2017: I am more than well aware of the state of things and how the site has changed since 2017.
>/mlpol/ is already a board of peace and friendship
It would be a lot easier to say that if we actually had regular pony content... Can you even remember the last greentext you read here? I think we can do a lot better, or at the very least it could be worth trying. Maybe do it temporarily for a few months and see how it works. It's not like we have anything to lose in trying.
It wasn't my idea, I just agree with it somewhat, so I can't explain it entirely. Follow the post linked in the OP and you can see a mass-reply to some of the posts in the Roe v Wade thread that discussed the topic. I'd prefer it if that poster argued for the proposition instead.
From what I understand, some users feel like /mlpol/ is as it stands a lot like /pol/ without GR15, instead of a hybrid of both boards. Some users thought /mlp/ users who were friendly with /mlpol/ or formerly used it would be more attracted to the site if they had a SFW pony board, where they could talk about cartoon horse escapism without always being blackpilled with grim headlines about the death of the white race, and also without flags or IDs, like /mlp/.
Then I guess there's also the idea of the idea that SFW boards exist for a reason, and that having porn in the same place as regular posting might not necessarily be the best for discussion.
>>6723
I have religiously visited this board every single day, without fail, since it was created April 2017: I am more than well aware of the state of things and how the site has changed since 2017.
>/mlpol/ is already a board of peace and friendship
It would be a lot easier to say that if we actually had regular pony content... Can you even remember the last greentext you read here? I think we can do a lot better, or at the very least it could be worth trying. Maybe do it temporarily for a few months and see how it works. It's not like we have anything to lose in trying.
>>6725
If we're going to do this, my preference would be to keep the second board SFW so the horsefuckers are at least forced to visit the main board for something. Though I will be perfectly honest, it is highly unlikely any "no porn" rules are going to be strictly enforced, so it probably won't matter.
If we're going to do this, my preference would be to keep the second board SFW so the horsefuckers are at least forced to visit the main board for something. Though I will be perfectly honest, it is highly unlikely any "no porn" rules are going to be strictly enforced, so it probably won't matter.
>>6730
To change (re-shape) /mlpol/ has been a tendency for a while, first was the policy, now the boards.
I say fuck that.
To change (re-shape) /mlpol/ has been a tendency for a while, first was the policy, now the boards.
I say fuck that.
>>6730
It begins accommodating some snowflakes and always "progresses". It is to expect that soon Aryanne will be spoilered and Hitler pics will be banned to not offend the jews.
It begins accommodating some snowflakes and always "progresses". It is to expect that soon Aryanne will be spoilered and Hitler pics will be banned to not offend the jews.
Content is king, not space. /a/ has space but is empty. The same would be true for this new board.
To tract newfags with pony we would be better of shilling GG's threads on mlp or other activities we do on the site.
This reminds me of the idea that tea time has discussed a few times: That /vx/ should be split up. No offense to that guy who suggests that but that wouldn't help at all.
Again, make threads that engage Anons in different ways and you have content, then make people aware of it.
I'm interested in anime but I never visit /a/ because there's no content. That's how simple it is.
To tract newfags with pony we would be better of shilling GG's threads on mlp or other activities we do on the site.
This reminds me of the idea that tea time has discussed a few times: That /vx/ should be split up. No offense to that guy who suggests that but that wouldn't help at all.
Again, make threads that engage Anons in different ways and you have content, then make people aware of it.
I'm interested in anime but I never visit /a/ because there's no content. That's how simple it is.
>>6719
Short version: No
>>6721
Begging your pardon, but please validate how having a blue board would incentivize posters.
>>6722
Fucking this
>>6723
And this
>>6724
>all it's going to do is resegregate /pol/ and /mlp/ into separate boards again, which kind of defeats the purpose of /mlpol/
Thank you
>I must also confess that I don't entirely understand why this is an issue
Ever worked in sales? Ever had a customer who absolutely wont buy the product no matter WHAT, but they demand all sorts of incentives just for the thrill of the game? Thats what this is.
I maintain that /mlp/ (and much/most of /pol/ while Im on) made their decision a LONG time ago, before any of these excuses were a concern. To cater now would be like apologizing to leftists; emasculating and utterly without product.
Short version: No
>>6721
Begging your pardon, but please validate how having a blue board would incentivize posters.
>>6722
Fucking this
>>6723
And this
>>6724
>all it's going to do is resegregate /pol/ and /mlp/ into separate boards again, which kind of defeats the purpose of /mlpol/
Thank you
>I must also confess that I don't entirely understand why this is an issue
Ever worked in sales? Ever had a customer who absolutely wont buy the product no matter WHAT, but they demand all sorts of incentives just for the thrill of the game? Thats what this is.
I maintain that /mlp/ (and much/most of /pol/ while Im on) made their decision a LONG time ago, before any of these excuses were a concern. To cater now would be like apologizing to leftists; emasculating and utterly without product.
>>6741
>Is reading greentext a requirement?
Well, on a pony board, it's a staple of content. That's just an example though.
>cater to them now
Cater to who? Users with ideas?
>see what they ask for next.
If they ask for something retarded, just say no.
>Is reading greentext a requirement?
Well, on a pony board, it's a staple of content. That's just an example though.
>cater to them now
Cater to who? Users with ideas?
>see what they ask for next.
If they ask for something retarded, just say no.
>>6744
>Well, on a pony board, it's a staple of content
From the beginning, I warned about comparing this site to 4chan 'established norms'....
>cater to whom
Ftfy
Well, the 'users with ideas' seem to want to fundamentally change the site structure, what with new boards and unwritten (but better believe theyre coming) expectations. Those are the ones I am urging caution in catering to.
>if they ask for something retarded
So, if they ALREADY asked for something retarded?
>Well, on a pony board, it's a staple of content
From the beginning, I warned about comparing this site to 4chan 'established norms'....
>cater to whom
Ftfy
Well, the 'users with ideas' seem to want to fundamentally change the site structure, what with new boards and unwritten (but better believe theyre coming) expectations. Those are the ones I am urging caution in catering to.
>if they ask for something retarded
So, if they ALREADY asked for something retarded?
>>6719
The core of the argument is seeing too many blackpills thus horsery on its own would thrive. I'd argue that would lead to a well known road of divide and conquer.
I would also say My Little Horsepussy Cum inside RD is an Anime as well...
On attracting people here it's a matter of choice between what is and what the alternatives are, and why that is the choice.
People can technically make their own bunker with minimal effort using key words and search.
There's nothing particularly missing, except being the first to come to mind.
The analogy of settlements there 4/mlp/ now a gentrified city past the golden glory, a Detroit. Here is a place everyone knows almost everybody else if not, the rough places where they come from.
/mlpol/ is the Christmas Hearthswarming miracle in April. Not everyone had that spirit then, but it's felt continuously. The joy in bridging two groups to face against the hoards as similar and dissimilar interests align.
Now 2022 4chin shidding street is swamped with shills and shit.
...
The core of the argument is seeing too many blackpills thus horsery on its own would thrive. I'd argue that would lead to a well known road of divide and conquer.
I would also say My Little Horsepussy Cum inside RD is an Anime as well...
On attracting people here it's a matter of choice between what is and what the alternatives are, and why that is the choice.
People can technically make their own bunker with minimal effort using key words and search.
There's nothing particularly missing, except being the first to come to mind.
The analogy of settlements there 4/mlp/ now a gentrified city past the golden glory, a Detroit. Here is a place everyone knows almost everybody else if not, the rough places where they come from.
/mlpol/ is the Christmas Hearthswarming miracle in April. Not everyone had that spirit then, but it's felt continuously. The joy in bridging two groups to face against the hoards as similar and dissimilar interests align.
Now 2022 4chin shidding street is swamped with shills and shit.
...
File (): 2447C5F9693E336910C7BE2F4644E178-191799.png (187.3 KB, 640x360, 2447C5F9693E336910C7BE2F4644E178-191799.png)
Original Idea shiller here. I want to make a direct case for how this should be implamented and what the expected outcome will be.
From the start of mlpol till now mlpol has passed up many opportunities to get users from 4chan's mlp. this generally happens when generals are shut down, when theres on board strife. the implamentation of the board wont see a huge flood of users until the mods decide to shit in their cornflakes again, which may be a while. Providing a horseboard experiance that 4chucks sucks and fucks wont. weather thats letting someone post horse images in the politics board or letting them post other shit on /mlp/. Like a youtube channel it will have to grow slowly, but keeping users is a real possibility as long as there is a place for content and discussion that the mods of /mlp/ are too pussy to allow. Weather thats meta, 4chan cup, board tan, milky, hi anon threads, etc.
I don't know if we should go the extra mile and encourage the autists who hate eqg to come here by banning eqg, but given 4cuck exists, I wouldn't complain about it if thats what the mods here wanted to do. or give op the right to remove images from their own threads. This is, as I said probably way too fucking much and truthfully I think it would be kind of faggy but theres no doubt theres a vocal portion of mlp that resents eqg, is easily trolled by it, and would come here in a heartbeat if there was a way they could get away from it.
From the start of mlpol till now mlpol has passed up many opportunities to get users from 4chan's mlp. this generally happens when generals are shut down, when theres on board strife. the implamentation of the board wont see a huge flood of users until the mods decide to shit in their cornflakes again, which may be a while. Providing a horseboard experiance that 4chucks sucks and fucks wont. weather thats letting someone post horse images in the politics board or letting them post other shit on /mlp/. Like a youtube channel it will have to grow slowly, but keeping users is a real possibility as long as there is a place for content and discussion that the mods of /mlp/ are too pussy to allow. Weather thats meta, 4chan cup, board tan, milky, hi anon threads, etc.
I don't know if we should go the extra mile and encourage the autists who hate eqg to come here by banning eqg, but given 4cuck exists, I wouldn't complain about it if thats what the mods here wanted to do. or give op the right to remove images from their own threads. This is, as I said probably way too fucking much and truthfully I think it would be kind of faggy but theres no doubt theres a vocal portion of mlp that resents eqg, is easily trolled by it, and would come here in a heartbeat if there was a way they could get away from it.
>>6737
>Again, make threads that engage Anons in different ways and you have content, then make people aware of it.
no matter how good your content, whites wont move next to blacks.
>Again, make threads that engage Anons in different ways and you have content, then make people aware of it.
no matter how good your content, whites wont move next to blacks.
>>6724
>but it seems like if everyone new who comes in has no interest in the political side and stays on the SFW board, all it's going to do is resegregate /pol/ and /mlp/ into separate boards again, which kind of defeats the purpose of /mlpol/. I guess my personal view is that the whole thing seems a bit unnecessary, and that if people want more pony threads there's nothing stopping them from posting more pony threads.
The problem is that the boards are already segregated, people who want to see more pony content on page one aren't going to keep hanging out on /mlpol/ and when I come to /mlpol/ as does just about does just about anyone else, we com here for the /pol/ side of things, as reflected by how little the horse threads stay on page 1.
>but it seems like if everyone new who comes in has no interest in the political side and stays on the SFW board, all it's going to do is resegregate /pol/ and /mlp/ into separate boards again, which kind of defeats the purpose of /mlpol/. I guess my personal view is that the whole thing seems a bit unnecessary, and that if people want more pony threads there's nothing stopping them from posting more pony threads.
The problem is that the boards are already segregated, people who want to see more pony content on page one aren't going to keep hanging out on /mlpol/ and when I come to /mlpol/ as does just about does just about anyone else, we com here for the /pol/ side of things, as reflected by how little the horse threads stay on page 1.
>>6732
why would we spoiler such images on mlpol.net/mlp/?
are you suggesting this site is a democracy?
>>6740
>I maintain that /mlp/ (and much/most of /pol/ while Im on) made their decision a LONG time ago,
this is actually the only criticism so far that isn;t retarded and is 100% true, mlpol lost so much ground that it IS arguable on weather the ship has sailed and nothing you do will recover the reputation this site has for being politics first and horse second.
why would we spoiler such images on mlpol.net/mlp/?
are you suggesting this site is a democracy?
>>6740
>I maintain that /mlp/ (and much/most of /pol/ while Im on) made their decision a LONG time ago,
this is actually the only criticism so far that isn;t retarded and is 100% true, mlpol lost so much ground that it IS arguable on weather the ship has sailed and nothing you do will recover the reputation this site has for being politics first and horse second.
>>6753
If /pol/ content were REALLY the issue, it is as it was with Derpy.
Just hide. Oh wait, thats really not the issue, its just an excuse.
If /pol/ content were REALLY the issue, it is as it was with Derpy.
Just hide. Oh wait, thats really not the issue, its just an excuse.
File (): 781FC9C31BF54BE0724FF78169D9CC57-44323.jpg (43.3 KB, 350x490, accelerator-1[1].jpg)
![accelerator-1[1].jpg](/images/src/781FC9C31BF54BE0724FF78169D9CC57-44323.jpg)
>>6746
>Well, the 'users with ideas' seem to want to fundamentally change the site structure, what with new boards and unwritten (but better believe theyre coming) expectations. Those are the ones I am urging caution in catering to.
this is exactly what i mean when I say that this site is for politics first. I don't honestly believe the vast majority of /pol/ users even understand how important our green generals are to /mlp/. why would they? the original /mlpol/ was cancer to 90% of them and their users gave up until /mlpol/ was over and /mlp/ came back. it was never going to be permanent anyway. /mlpol/ doesn't have a rule against green text, but the format of the board, the differences between /mlp/ and /pol/'s user sizes make it clear that mixing the demographics is cancer for one side more than the other. people come to /mlp/ praying for green and OC. it's one of the most if not the most creative board on the site. but as it is, with a userbase this out of touch that they would call something so essential a 4chan established norm, it's obvious how big of a divide there really is between horsefuckers and polacks.
>>6756
>if accelerator really is the issue, just hide , oh wait, thats just an excuse.
newfag.
>Well, the 'users with ideas' seem to want to fundamentally change the site structure, what with new boards and unwritten (but better believe theyre coming) expectations. Those are the ones I am urging caution in catering to.
this is exactly what i mean when I say that this site is for politics first. I don't honestly believe the vast majority of /pol/ users even understand how important our green generals are to /mlp/. why would they? the original /mlpol/ was cancer to 90% of them and their users gave up until /mlpol/ was over and /mlp/ came back. it was never going to be permanent anyway. /mlpol/ doesn't have a rule against green text, but the format of the board, the differences between /mlp/ and /pol/'s user sizes make it clear that mixing the demographics is cancer for one side more than the other. people come to /mlp/ praying for green and OC. it's one of the most if not the most creative board on the site. but as it is, with a userbase this out of touch that they would call something so essential a 4chan established norm, it's obvious how big of a divide there really is between horsefuckers and polacks.
>>6756
>if accelerator really is the issue, just hide , oh wait, thats just an excuse.
newfag.
File (): 8B9D8AC2AC0D0367E5D7445E919A3C3C-710896.png (694.2 KB, 1417x1429, 1618553847047.png)
>>6731
Given /d/ exists with all its divergant fetish generals I don't necissarily think it would be a problem to keep red pony content in /mlpol/, as long as the greentext itself was not policed on the blueboard.
As for moderation, with increase user size, administrating the site or otherwise finding and vetting someone who isn't a giga kike will probably be the biggest issue. I don't see a problem necissarily with 4chans divide between mod and disposable jannys who do it for free though. people do like to browse mlp at work and its harder to do that with horsetits everywhere.
Given /d/ exists with all its divergant fetish generals I don't necissarily think it would be a problem to keep red pony content in /mlpol/, as long as the greentext itself was not policed on the blueboard.
As for moderation, with increase user size, administrating the site or otherwise finding and vetting someone who isn't a giga kike will probably be the biggest issue. I don't see a problem necissarily with 4chans divide between mod and disposable jannys who do it for free though. people do like to browse mlp at work and its harder to do that with horsetits everywhere.
>>6726
>It would be a lot easier to say that if we actually had regular pony content... Can you even remember the last greentext you read here? I think we can do a lot better, or at the very least it could be worth trying. Maybe do it temporarily for a few months and see how it works. It's not like we have anything to lose in trying.
>just try it once, fail, quite forever, and feel ashamed of yourself like a normal person
No offense, given you went to bat for my case in my absence, but I don't feel like treating the move as temporary would be a good move at all. either do it for real or don't bother. Putting it up and then taking it down would be worse than never putting it up at all. users aren't going to move here overnight, theyre going to come slowly each time 4chuck mods makes doing what they like difficult. Getting each influx of users is going to be an effort of will on the part of the users of this site, and where applicable, the administration, if theres some kind of technical thing that /mlp/ users would want for whatever reason. It's not something worth doing at all by people who just don't give a fuck honestly.
>It would be a lot easier to say that if we actually had regular pony content... Can you even remember the last greentext you read here? I think we can do a lot better, or at the very least it could be worth trying. Maybe do it temporarily for a few months and see how it works. It's not like we have anything to lose in trying.
>just try it once, fail, quite forever, and feel ashamed of yourself like a normal person
No offense, given you went to bat for my case in my absence, but I don't feel like treating the move as temporary would be a good move at all. either do it for real or don't bother. Putting it up and then taking it down would be worse than never putting it up at all. users aren't going to move here overnight, theyre going to come slowly each time 4chuck mods makes doing what they like difficult. Getting each influx of users is going to be an effort of will on the part of the users of this site, and where applicable, the administration, if theres some kind of technical thing that /mlp/ users would want for whatever reason. It's not something worth doing at all by people who just don't give a fuck honestly.
>>6752
>no matter how good your content, whites wont move next to blacks.
Tch, what is that even suppose to me?
Clearly, polacks and horsf***ers can share the same space and you're wrong, by the way, (sadly) people stick with this society despite it's madness because of bread and circuses.
>>6753
I relate to little in this post. Sure, pony thread and pol thread are often separate entities. The things that connect them are the memes and views of the anons in them that they share.
>people who want to see more pony content on page one aren't going to keep hanging out on /mlpol/
Yet, I do.
But besides that, aren't you saying what I'm saying, if there is no content, then there is no reason to be there.
Look, this could be a problem after we get a lot of trafic. Now, not so much.
>no matter how good your content, whites wont move next to blacks.
Tch, what is that even suppose to me?
Clearly, polacks and horsf***ers can share the same space and you're wrong, by the way, (sadly) people stick with this society despite it's madness because of bread and circuses.
>>6753
I relate to little in this post. Sure, pony thread and pol thread are often separate entities. The things that connect them are the memes and views of the anons in them that they share.
>people who want to see more pony content on page one aren't going to keep hanging out on /mlpol/
Yet, I do.
But besides that, aren't you saying what I'm saying, if there is no content, then there is no reason to be there.
Look, this could be a problem after we get a lot of trafic. Now, not so much.
I also dislike this like thinking. I have shared in the past OP so don't feel too bad. The thinking that we need to attract more people to the site. Let's not get blinkered and focus on fishing and instead focus on having fun with Anons you already have.
Even that's not completely right. Don't try to have fun or be engaging because of an obligation. Do it because you want to.
If this site becomes only for politics and horsefuckers wish to spend their time elsewhere, then so be it. The site will still have a purpose and serve some people.
Threads about ponies get at least one response but usually several. People care about pony content on this site so engage with that. I do for example. If you and I can bond over ponies do you really need a crowd?
Even that's not completely right. Don't try to have fun or be engaging because of an obligation. Do it because you want to.
If this site becomes only for politics and horsefuckers wish to spend their time elsewhere, then so be it. The site will still have a purpose and serve some people.
Threads about ponies get at least one response but usually several. People care about pony content on this site so engage with that. I do for example. If you and I can bond over ponies do you really need a crowd?
File (): E978943E9DAFD14FF282A26933377CF8-736006.png (718.8 KB, 1100x1400, 1573754934970.png)
File (): 40614A1D5AFE52290D7308CFBB58EE94-587003.jpg (573.2 KB, 1550x864, Short Story.jpg)
>>6761
>Yet, I do.
and yet no one else does.
when big happenings of a political nature happen here, the board becomes /pol/. when /mlp/ happenings happen here, we get one or two replies. the biggest OC this board has is divegrass, which is something but not enough of something to say its in any way comparable.
>Don't try to have fun or be engaging because of an obligation. Do it because you want to.
I do want to grow this site because I genuinely want to have fun with anons without mods cucking me, faggot. My frustration comes from the clear message from the mods and I guess the community, they do not agree, they would rather sit in politics and seeth.
>just be greatful of what you have!
>threads about ponies get at least one response, actually, several!
>do you really need a crowd?
if you replaced horsefuckers with whites you would be called a jew and told to kill yourself immediately.
>Yet, I do.
and yet no one else does.
when big happenings of a political nature happen here, the board becomes /pol/. when /mlp/ happenings happen here, we get one or two replies. the biggest OC this board has is divegrass, which is something but not enough of something to say its in any way comparable.
>Don't try to have fun or be engaging because of an obligation. Do it because you want to.
I do want to grow this site because I genuinely want to have fun with anons without mods cucking me, faggot. My frustration comes from the clear message from the mods and I guess the community, they do not agree, they would rather sit in politics and seeth.
>just be greatful of what you have!
>threads about ponies get at least one response, actually, several!
>do you really need a crowd?
if you replaced horsefuckers with whites you would be called a jew and told to kill yourself immediately.
File (): 23E4D02EB9F4C71C8426E7D2DF74339A-1125846.gif (1.1 MB, 572x540, qqsa37.gif)
>>6719
It is newfags who must adapt to chan-culture and not the other way around. As always has been.
Safe space denied.
It is newfags who must adapt to chan-culture and not the other way around. As always has been.
Safe space denied.
Sometimes I feel reluctant to make FIM related threads because something political and important is on the front page.
Why not test out a dedicated FIM only board for a month, and see if it sucks any users and generals away from 4/mlp/?
Uncensored political discussions could arise naturally on this board that would never be allowed on 4chan.
Why not test out a dedicated FIM only board for a month, and see if it sucks any users and generals away from 4/mlp/?
Uncensored political discussions could arise naturally on this board that would never be allowed on 4chan.
>>6760
>I don't feel like treating the move as temporary would be a good move at all. either do it for real or don't bother.
What's wrong with experimenting though?
>I don't feel like treating the move as temporary would be a good move at all. either do it for real or don't bother.
What's wrong with experimenting though?
>>6763
>when big happenings of a political nature happen here, the board becomes /pol/. when /mlp/ happenings happen here, we get one or two replies
Yeah, that's exactly the issue I see here.
I make a lot of threads on /mlpol/, including most of the political happening threads. The political happening threads get replies, the pony happening threads don't get that many at all. I want more pony stuff...
>when big happenings of a political nature happen here, the board becomes /pol/. when /mlp/ happenings happen here, we get one or two replies
Yeah, that's exactly the issue I see here.
I make a lot of threads on /mlpol/, including most of the political happening threads. The political happening threads get replies, the pony happening threads don't get that many at all. I want more pony stuff...
File (): 532A9AF7DBA66634D4CE0A02DC9F38F2-71257.gif (69.6 KB, 501x501, 1171610.gif)
>>6741
>Care to make an argument, or are you just gonna half-assed disagree and then waifishly retreat?
Does an argument need to be made? What's being proposed here is just adding an extra board for pony-only posting, nobody's talking about banning Hitler or Aryanne. The post I responded to was massively overreacting, and I pointed this out. If anyone should be called out for not making any arguments it's that poster, but I don't even think the topic is worth pursuing that far.
Honestly if there's any argument to be made for why the /pol/ side of things might be driving people away, it's not that there's any problem with the content being posted, it's just that so many /pol/ anons are paranoid to the point of it being actually comical, and it's physically exhausting to try to have a conversation with them sometimes. Someone proposes tweaking the site format a bit, and some schizo immediately jumps to the conclusion it's some kind of conspiracy to de-Nazify the site, and starts bringing up kikes and subversion out of nowhere. I point out that this is an overreaction with no basis beyond paranoia, and some third schizo, (You), jumps in and demands an unreasonably high threshold of proof for a post that was completely self-explanatory.
If anyone is being driven away from the site, it's probably just due to their being slowly worn down by shit like this. You try to have a sensible, civil discussion about literally any topic only to end up in a pointless argument against some schizo who treats every conversation like a zero-sum bare-knuckle brawl. It's not so much that people are being driven away, as that many of them are probably realizing that they're spending way too much time trying to argue with people who are too silly to be arguing with in the first place. At that point they just stop posting because it's not worth the effort. Is that enough of an argument for you, or do I need to provide a page and a half of citations?
>Care to make an argument, or are you just gonna half-assed disagree and then waifishly retreat?
Does an argument need to be made? What's being proposed here is just adding an extra board for pony-only posting, nobody's talking about banning Hitler or Aryanne. The post I responded to was massively overreacting, and I pointed this out. If anyone should be called out for not making any arguments it's that poster, but I don't even think the topic is worth pursuing that far.
Honestly if there's any argument to be made for why the /pol/ side of things might be driving people away, it's not that there's any problem with the content being posted, it's just that so many /pol/ anons are paranoid to the point of it being actually comical, and it's physically exhausting to try to have a conversation with them sometimes. Someone proposes tweaking the site format a bit, and some schizo immediately jumps to the conclusion it's some kind of conspiracy to de-Nazify the site, and starts bringing up kikes and subversion out of nowhere. I point out that this is an overreaction with no basis beyond paranoia, and some third schizo, (You), jumps in and demands an unreasonably high threshold of proof for a post that was completely self-explanatory.
If anyone is being driven away from the site, it's probably just due to their being slowly worn down by shit like this. You try to have a sensible, civil discussion about literally any topic only to end up in a pointless argument against some schizo who treats every conversation like a zero-sum bare-knuckle brawl. It's not so much that people are being driven away, as that many of them are probably realizing that they're spending way too much time trying to argue with people who are too silly to be arguing with in the first place. At that point they just stop posting because it's not worth the effort. Is that enough of an argument for you, or do I need to provide a page and a half of citations?
File (): E989405AA00D0BE20B9388BAA98FD19C-35469.jpg (34.6 KB, 480x462, IMG_3658.jpg)
File (): F1413B3042256D486E50B79B6DA026B8-14195.jpg (13.9 KB, 347x350, 1rutg0d.jpg)
>>6763
<without mods cucking me, faggot.
>Makes thread about how users are aggressive to change.
>Is aggressive against users who don't want change but aren't aggressive.
Have I insulted you at all? No, I haven't. Not that it bothers me, being on a chan and all but I just wanted to point this out.
>if you replaced horsefuckers with whites you would be called a jew and told to kill yourself immediately.
You appeal to the site and the anons on it at the same time as you push for changing a community fundamentally. Mlpol is the conflux of these two sides, to have whitepill with the blackpill or however you wanna describe it. Point is, if we're going to start screaming, "You're the real kike," here wouldn't you who wants to change a tradition while defaming the people in it that doesn't want to, be the real kike, mah nigguha.
Reminder: You could have prevented this.
Just because we didn't want to download a hugeass file and told you why about leakage in Hasbro doesn't mean other pony threads doesn't get traffic. In fact, your thread got traffic it just wasn't well received. Seethe n' cope ;^P
Big pony happenings do get attention, like G5, PonyLife, etc. And check the catalog man. Even Political threads have poni pictures on them.
I don't know if you were talking about the mods here or on 4chan but they certainly don't cuck you here. If anything, they are hard to get started.
Again though, I wasn't bothered that much about your insults as I am about how you keep moving the conversation. My two points are:
1)Content is king so your split will not only change mlpol fundamentally but also it would just be another /a/.
2) There are a lot of people here who enjoy pony posting, myself included. Make good threads and there will be people who are interested.
I myself have been sometimes frustrated on the low engage I have had from users here at times. This really doesn't happen that often mind you, cuz people actually do care (I want to stress that I can partially see your point of view but thinks it is skewed). But anyway, sometimes that's their "fault" (Again, no obligation is for the best, I think) other times that's my "fault" for writing something subpar or creating a subpar thread.
I have posted greentexts where I got zero (you)s, where were you at those times? Exactly, sometimes things doesn't take off, marebe your fault marebe not, people have lives afterall.
What I'm trying to say in this last meandering parts is that I can sympathize with your plight but I disagree with your solution and I also think you're not appreciating what you have enough.
<without mods cucking me, faggot.
>Makes thread about how users are aggressive to change.
>Is aggressive against users who don't want change but aren't aggressive.
Have I insulted you at all? No, I haven't. Not that it bothers me, being on a chan and all but I just wanted to point this out.
>if you replaced horsefuckers with whites you would be called a jew and told to kill yourself immediately.
You appeal to the site and the anons on it at the same time as you push for changing a community fundamentally. Mlpol is the conflux of these two sides, to have whitepill with the blackpill or however you wanna describe it. Point is, if we're going to start screaming, "You're the real kike," here wouldn't you who wants to change a tradition while defaming the people in it that doesn't want to, be the real kike, mah nigguha.
Reminder: You could have prevented this.
Just because we didn't want to download a hugeass file and told you why about leakage in Hasbro doesn't mean other pony threads doesn't get traffic. In fact, your thread got traffic it just wasn't well received. Seethe n' cope ;^P
Big pony happenings do get attention, like G5, PonyLife, etc. And check the catalog man. Even Political threads have poni pictures on them.
I don't know if you were talking about the mods here or on 4chan but they certainly don't cuck you here. If anything, they are hard to get started.
Again though, I wasn't bothered that much about your insults as I am about how you keep moving the conversation. My two points are:
1)Content is king so your split will not only change mlpol fundamentally but also it would just be another /a/.
2) There are a lot of people here who enjoy pony posting, myself included. Make good threads and there will be people who are interested.
I myself have been sometimes frustrated on the low engage I have had from users here at times. This really doesn't happen that often mind you, cuz people actually do care (I want to stress that I can partially see your point of view but thinks it is skewed). But anyway, sometimes that's their "fault" (Again, no obligation is for the best, I think) other times that's my "fault" for writing something subpar or creating a subpar thread.
I have posted greentexts where I got zero (you)s, where were you at those times? Exactly, sometimes things doesn't take off, marebe your fault marebe not, people have lives afterall.
What I'm trying to say in this last meandering parts is that I can sympathize with your plight but I disagree with your solution and I also think you're not appreciating what you have enough.
>>6802
are you pretending to be retarded at this point? you do know IDs are on in this thread right? who am I?
>>6803
>Have I insulted you at all? No, I haven't. Not that it bothers me, being on a chan and all but I just wanted to point this out.
faggot isn't an insult on 4chan.
>You appeal to the site and the anons on it at the same time as you push for changing a community fundamentally.
Because I use and care about said sites. apparently longer than you. I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume the rest of your post reads like you're a retarded zigger because you are phone posting.
> Mlpol is the conflux of these two sides, to have whitepill with the blackpill or however you wanna describe it.
and in the best of days that's never going to hold a dedicated horsefuckers attention for long.
>If we're going to start screaming you're the real kike
then stop using kike arguments.
>you're trying to change tradition
again with this narrative. I am not changing anything, tradition has already changed. 90% of the horsefuckers interested in /mlpol/? they hang around in aryanne threads in /mlp/, not here. I said it before and I said it again, /mlpol/ is not /mlp/+/pol/. it's /pol/ without gr15.
Finally, I want to take a tangent here, because the last line really genuinely pisses me off as a conservative. Conservatism isn't never changing traditions you retard. That's what causes shit like the marxist republican party to exist. Slovenly sloths dressed up as human beings who hate their lives being inconvenienced in any way or stepping outside their comfort zone. If you are a conservative and you never change your traditions, you're equivalent to a technological luddite who reprints the Iliad in stone tablet only. Whats wrong with paper books? Ones and zeros? Why should my shitty father hate computers but love guns? The only reason is because he's too prideful and too dismissive to see how it can be used as a weapon or other tool. If you run out of cool books to carve with your stonemasonry skills but you just cant give up the rock then learn to carve something other than books. Traditions are worthless unless you can use them in your day to day life. And if the magic of friendship starts to wear dull and all of your friends are leaving because you wont shut up about politics 24/7, maybe find a different way.
Or don't. Why do you think I'm so invested in changing your opinion? I'm only giving you the 4chan way; A complete lack of respect for your faggot behavior, and lotus/et all. Just as I'm sure they've done similarly to users or retards that annoy them with their brand of stupidity. As much as that happens this is yours.
are you pretending to be retarded at this point? you do know IDs are on in this thread right? who am I?
>>6803
>Have I insulted you at all? No, I haven't. Not that it bothers me, being on a chan and all but I just wanted to point this out.
faggot isn't an insult on 4chan.
>You appeal to the site and the anons on it at the same time as you push for changing a community fundamentally.
Because I use and care about said sites. apparently longer than you. I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume the rest of your post reads like you're a retarded zigger because you are phone posting.
> Mlpol is the conflux of these two sides, to have whitepill with the blackpill or however you wanna describe it.
and in the best of days that's never going to hold a dedicated horsefuckers attention for long.
>If we're going to start screaming you're the real kike
then stop using kike arguments.
>you're trying to change tradition
again with this narrative. I am not changing anything, tradition has already changed. 90% of the horsefuckers interested in /mlpol/? they hang around in aryanne threads in /mlp/, not here. I said it before and I said it again, /mlpol/ is not /mlp/+/pol/. it's /pol/ without gr15.
Finally, I want to take a tangent here, because the last line really genuinely pisses me off as a conservative. Conservatism isn't never changing traditions you retard. That's what causes shit like the marxist republican party to exist. Slovenly sloths dressed up as human beings who hate their lives being inconvenienced in any way or stepping outside their comfort zone. If you are a conservative and you never change your traditions, you're equivalent to a technological luddite who reprints the Iliad in stone tablet only. Whats wrong with paper books? Ones and zeros? Why should my shitty father hate computers but love guns? The only reason is because he's too prideful and too dismissive to see how it can be used as a weapon or other tool. If you run out of cool books to carve with your stonemasonry skills but you just cant give up the rock then learn to carve something other than books. Traditions are worthless unless you can use them in your day to day life. And if the magic of friendship starts to wear dull and all of your friends are leaving because you wont shut up about politics 24/7, maybe find a different way.
Or don't. Why do you think I'm so invested in changing your opinion? I'm only giving you the 4chan way; A complete lack of respect for your faggot behavior, and lotus/et all. Just as I'm sure they've done similarly to users or retards that annoy them with their brand of stupidity. As much as that happens this is yours.
>>6784
>Honestly if there's any argument to be made for why the /pol/ side of things might be driving people away, it's not that there's any problem with the content being posted, it's just that so many /pol/ anons are paranoid to the point of it being actually comical, and it's physically exhausting to try to have a conversation with them sometimes.
>Someone proposes tweaking the site format a bit,
Honestly, this rhetoric makes sirens go off in my head more than the split idea does.
I'd like to know where you got this information that polacks are driving ponyfags away from this site? That's something you could give me some citations on. You don't have to believe me, but I a ponyfag have never felt like a second-class citizen.
> You try to have a sensible, civil discussion about literally any topic only to end up in a pointless argument against some schizo who treats every conversation like a zero-sum bare-knuckle brawl.
I disagree hard with this description of the site. In fact, I'd argue that we're way more civil than other chans. Sperg civil wars are not alien to mlp either, as (I think it was) OP pointed out eqg aren't that popular amongst ponyfags. Isn't that because they're stuck in their ways and being schizo?
>What's being proposed here is just adding an extra board for pony-only posting,
>nobody's talking about banning Hitler or Aryanne.
But is Hitler a pony though?
>Honestly if there's any argument to be made for why the /pol/ side of things might be driving people away, it's not that there's any problem with the content being posted, it's just that so many /pol/ anons are paranoid to the point of it being actually comical, and it's physically exhausting to try to have a conversation with them sometimes.
>Someone proposes tweaking the site format a bit,
Honestly, this rhetoric makes sirens go off in my head more than the split idea does.
I'd like to know where you got this information that polacks are driving ponyfags away from this site? That's something you could give me some citations on. You don't have to believe me, but I a ponyfag have never felt like a second-class citizen.
> You try to have a sensible, civil discussion about literally any topic only to end up in a pointless argument against some schizo who treats every conversation like a zero-sum bare-knuckle brawl.
I disagree hard with this description of the site. In fact, I'd argue that we're way more civil than other chans. Sperg civil wars are not alien to mlp either, as (I think it was) OP pointed out eqg aren't that popular amongst ponyfags. Isn't that because they're stuck in their ways and being schizo?
>What's being proposed here is just adding an extra board for pony-only posting,
>nobody's talking about banning Hitler or Aryanne.
But is Hitler a pony though?
File (): BAB9AD51E60EFFCD31DDB97BBBCE005B-311769.jpg (304.5 KB, 590x684, Hey hey, ponies.jpg)
>>6806
>I'd like to know where you got this information that polacks are driving ponyfags away from this site? That's something you could give me some citations on. You don't have to believe me, but I a ponyfag have never felt like a second-class citizen.
not that anon but it's not fucking hard to tell based on the threads that make it to the top and see the most activity, and the complete lack of OC being generated here, as well as the fact that when 4chan unbanned certain groups who made a home here in this website, like anon filly, they go right back to 4chan instead of remaining here. It's obvious to me, even without numbers, that if people are rushing back to 4cuck for their next you instead of here where people actually supposedly respect them, theres a fundamental difference between what content is obviously important here.
Ironic considering you are the faggots who keep seething and screaming kike at this criticism. you got angry at me for turning that sword deservedly back at you, and here you are doing it again and riding the hyperbole train. So I'll give you another form of measurement. My ideals suddenly have appeal. it's very obvious to me that I'm a powerless halfwit at best who tends to school on people mostly because they are lazy or don't do their due dilligence. As a result, I rarely get a following, yet people here are giving my idea some merited defense, and why not, you make my argument for me. Lashing out at other horsefuckers and calling them kikes. I'm hardly free of such sin, but I'm not the one pretending I'm an ubermench fighting off the jews. I'm a fucking retard who likes tiny horses and at best turning kike jewery around with meme magic and reverse uno cards. At worst all I want to do is read some fun escapist fantasy stuff to recharge instead of getting embroiled in another 2 hour long b8 thread. Here you are talking big about tradition and not feeling like a second class zigger but you aren't listening to other people. and all I had to do to get them to consider the idea was yell into the void one more time and have you retards attack me.
>I'd like to know where you got this information that polacks are driving ponyfags away from this site? That's something you could give me some citations on. You don't have to believe me, but I a ponyfag have never felt like a second-class citizen.
not that anon but it's not fucking hard to tell based on the threads that make it to the top and see the most activity, and the complete lack of OC being generated here, as well as the fact that when 4chan unbanned certain groups who made a home here in this website, like anon filly, they go right back to 4chan instead of remaining here. It's obvious to me, even without numbers, that if people are rushing back to 4cuck for their next you instead of here where people actually supposedly respect them, theres a fundamental difference between what content is obviously important here.
Ironic considering you are the faggots who keep seething and screaming kike at this criticism. you got angry at me for turning that sword deservedly back at you, and here you are doing it again and riding the hyperbole train. So I'll give you another form of measurement. My ideals suddenly have appeal. it's very obvious to me that I'm a powerless halfwit at best who tends to school on people mostly because they are lazy or don't do their due dilligence. As a result, I rarely get a following, yet people here are giving my idea some merited defense, and why not, you make my argument for me. Lashing out at other horsefuckers and calling them kikes. I'm hardly free of such sin, but I'm not the one pretending I'm an ubermench fighting off the jews. I'm a fucking retard who likes tiny horses and at best turning kike jewery around with meme magic and reverse uno cards. At worst all I want to do is read some fun escapist fantasy stuff to recharge instead of getting embroiled in another 2 hour long b8 thread. Here you are talking big about tradition and not feeling like a second class zigger but you aren't listening to other people. and all I had to do to get them to consider the idea was yell into the void one more time and have you retards attack me.
>>6805
I'll get back to this but I greentexted what I thought was an intresting contradiction. I don't care if you insult me or insinuate that I'm a kike. But; maybe I'm wrong and you aren't OP for both this thread and the related thread on /qa/, I just assumed; my point was that that thread talks about how anons reacted strongly negatively towards this thread but I didn't. I just disagreed and then you reacted that strongly towards me.
Seems like that whinny-thread was unnecessary.
I'll get back to this but I greentexted what I thought was an intresting contradiction. I don't care if you insult me or insinuate that I'm a kike. But; maybe I'm wrong and you aren't OP for both this thread and the related thread on /qa/, I just assumed; my point was that that thread talks about how anons reacted strongly negatively towards this thread but I didn't. I just disagreed and then you reacted that strongly towards me.
Seems like that whinny-thread was unnecessary.
File (): 9B7F978D98BE4C7AE6EEB4663A846795-137126.png (133.9 KB, 1172x1416, 042fgrtvv0.png)
That's it. Now it is about segregation because muh polaks.
Want more pony? Then post ponies, don't expect someponer do it for you.
/mlpol/ stays like it is.
Want more pony? Then post ponies, don't expect someponer do it for you.
/mlpol/ stays like it is.
File (): 909F9E2B1926B8E8E57D9C375C244A5C-7257.jpg (7.1 KB, 300x168, images.jpg)
>>6808
I'm "OP" in the sense that I am the one who you usually find taking pot shots at lotus/mlpol mods for turning down this idea already. but It wasn't my idea to make this thread and I was surprised to see it was made and gained as many posts as it did. I don't personally think this idea would ever work without them being fully on board with it rather than doing it grudgingly.
>>6809
>gets called out
>pretends nothing happened
>back to rhetoric tricks
can you rub your filthy talons any harder? this has already been answered. We do post pony. Just not here were it sucks to do so.
I'm "OP" in the sense that I am the one who you usually find taking pot shots at lotus/mlpol mods for turning down this idea already. but It wasn't my idea to make this thread and I was surprised to see it was made and gained as many posts as it did. I don't personally think this idea would ever work without them being fully on board with it rather than doing it grudgingly.
>>6809
>gets called out
>pretends nothing happened
>back to rhetoric tricks
can you rub your filthy talons any harder? this has already been answered. We do post pony. Just not here were it sucks to do so.
File (): 9B3A4F31FCED59E810EA3E995D43B650-1134452.png (1.1 MB, 2000x1559, 9B3A4F31FCED59E810EA3E995D43B650-1134452.png)
>>6810
>gets called out
Actually it was a subtle way to call your attention. Sorry if you didn't get it.
>gets called out
Actually it was a subtle way to call your attention. Sorry if you didn't get it.
File (): 7C4EB812CF896E04B9345860C17786AF-741068.png (723.7 KB, 3413x3000, 7C4EB812CF896E04B9345860C17786AF-741068.png)
>>6811
>drawfaggotry
okay, but wheres the green anon? where are my prompts?
fuck even actual /pol/ has the occasional hitler prompt.
>drawfaggotry
okay, but wheres the green anon? where are my prompts?
fuck even actual /pol/ has the occasional hitler prompt.
>>6812
Okay ESL kun, but if you want to make it clear you are talking to the thread instead of me, you don't link my post to make it clear you're addressing the thread.
Okay ESL kun, but if you want to make it clear you are talking to the thread instead of me, you don't link my post to make it clear you're addressing the thread.
>>6809
>Want more pony? Then post ponies, don't expect someponer do it for you.
I agree with this sentiment.
But it's not like I'm really against entertaining the idea in my mind, I just don't like the hard rhetoric. There might be merits to this split but my points on why haven't been answered in a satisfying way because I've been mostly attacked. When I'm personally attacked for criticizing things, it makes me question those people's intentions.
If we could have a civil conversation about the future of mlpol without this shitflinging it would help us avoid making bad decisions. I could be pro split but I'm not convinced and the way pro-people have straight-up ignored my points (Won't it be just another /a/? for example.), makes me inhale through my teeth and question their trustworthiness. On that note, I don't like how you simultaneously emphasize the importance of doing this but also refer to it as a small tweak.
>Want more pony? Then post ponies, don't expect someponer do it for you.
I agree with this sentiment.
But it's not like I'm really against entertaining the idea in my mind, I just don't like the hard rhetoric. There might be merits to this split but my points on why haven't been answered in a satisfying way because I've been mostly attacked. When I'm personally attacked for criticizing things, it makes me question those people's intentions.
If we could have a civil conversation about the future of mlpol without this shitflinging it would help us avoid making bad decisions. I could be pro split but I'm not convinced and the way pro-people have straight-up ignored my points (Won't it be just another /a/? for example.), makes me inhale through my teeth and question their trustworthiness. On that note, I don't like how you simultaneously emphasize the importance of doing this but also refer to it as a small tweak.
>>6817
>hard rhetoric
This is not a minor thing.
Changes are not welcome, and that is proportional to autism's levels. >>>/ub/4698 →
>hard rhetoric
This is not a minor thing.
Changes are not welcome, and that is proportional to autism's levels. >>>/ub/4698 →
File (): 7657DC1E46449C75354DB7368CD4398D-142100.jpg (138.8 KB, 1280x720, 944.jpg)
File (): 87D229D3F9391AF2E1E38B634276F89D-167185.png (163.3 KB, 654x786, Fuck Wagies.png)
>>6817
>makes me inhale through my teeth and question their trustworthiness.
first of all, grow some awareness of your own shitflinging, I already admit to flinging shit, but then, I flung shit because I am frustrated by knowing the mods are basically unmovable in this position, so I never had anything to lose by being polite, since I already lost everything by being polite. Second, Understand that dialogue even with the presence of IDs carries the stigma of the ancestor, if you go to bat and start talking about how you think other people are acting like kikes, then get upset when called out for the kike behavior, you can't there after say "well that wasn't me who originally called you kikes" you rode in under the banner of one side of this brawl or the other, without taking any effort to distinguish yourself. Thirdly, what point are you making that you feel hasn't been addressed? I've gone out of my way to address all of them. I don't know what /a/ is if you aren't referring to 4chan/a/ but if I had a guess this site tried an /a/ at some point and it failed? If so that's exactly why I said multiple times in this and the other thread that doing this is pointless as a temporary test the waters thing. You need patience and tenacity. People involved need to want to believe it will work and make inroads to make it happen. Otherwise yes, you will get a barren board that closes in 6 months of inactivity.
>small tweak important decision
It's small for the people who don't care and important for the people who do care, much like a mcdonalds pony toy is worthless to 99% of people but would be important to me. though I'm not the person who used such language, because I don't believe that what I proposed would be small, just that the longer we wait, the harder it will be in the future.
Finally, breath through your nose, it actually enhances brain function.
>makes me inhale through my teeth and question their trustworthiness.
first of all, grow some awareness of your own shitflinging, I already admit to flinging shit, but then, I flung shit because I am frustrated by knowing the mods are basically unmovable in this position, so I never had anything to lose by being polite, since I already lost everything by being polite. Second, Understand that dialogue even with the presence of IDs carries the stigma of the ancestor, if you go to bat and start talking about how you think other people are acting like kikes, then get upset when called out for the kike behavior, you can't there after say "well that wasn't me who originally called you kikes" you rode in under the banner of one side of this brawl or the other, without taking any effort to distinguish yourself. Thirdly, what point are you making that you feel hasn't been addressed? I've gone out of my way to address all of them. I don't know what /a/ is if you aren't referring to 4chan/a/ but if I had a guess this site tried an /a/ at some point and it failed? If so that's exactly why I said multiple times in this and the other thread that doing this is pointless as a temporary test the waters thing. You need patience and tenacity. People involved need to want to believe it will work and make inroads to make it happen. Otherwise yes, you will get a barren board that closes in 6 months of inactivity.
>small tweak important decision
It's small for the people who don't care and important for the people who do care, much like a mcdonalds pony toy is worthless to 99% of people but would be important to me. though I'm not the person who used such language, because I don't believe that what I proposed would be small, just that the longer we wait, the harder it will be in the future.
Finally, breath through your nose, it actually enhances brain function.
File (): 27E9D066C87BB1B265D5BC3A30D73467-1215704.gif (1.2 MB, 550x400, 27E9D066C87BB1B265D5BC3A30D73467-1215704.gif)
>>6818
It's funny how you can post something like this but remain steadfastly ignorant to the great lack of /pol/ type threads on /mlp/. Yes, you are right, we don't like change, and for most of us, having the top 20-30 threads be mostly political is too much change. I genuinely think a GR15 free /pol/ is a great idea, and I've trained myself to the point where I only come here for /pol/ related things, but I definitely do not come here for horse content. It's practically barren of it.
It's funny how you can post something like this but remain steadfastly ignorant to the great lack of /pol/ type threads on /mlp/. Yes, you are right, we don't like change, and for most of us, having the top 20-30 threads be mostly political is too much change. I genuinely think a GR15 free /pol/ is a great idea, and I've trained myself to the point where I only come here for /pol/ related things, but I definitely do not come here for horse content. It's practically barren of it.
>>6820
>having the top 20-30 threads be mostly political is too much change.
It is easy to fix. Post and post and post ponies.
>having the top 20-30 threads be mostly political is too much change.
It is easy to fix. Post and post and post ponies.
File (): B9C63288E6E33863D26292D674F55662-961890.png (939.3 KB, 1280x800, 1411176211981.png)
>>6821
>play in front of mommy and daddy arguing about politics.
No thanks, I'll post them on /mlp/ instead.
>play in front of mommy and daddy arguing about politics.
No thanks, I'll post them on /mlp/ instead.
File (): 3EF9858026045C301D6111C969D9F55F-178814.gif (174.6 KB, 683x683, 6bdrhf6.gif)
>>6822
Suit yourself, but change begins at home.
You may begin copypasta greens and them plastering the board with ponies. Nopony will stop you.
Suit yourself, but change begins at home.
You may begin copypasta greens and them plastering the board with ponies. Nopony will stop you.
>>6823
>dude just be a huge homo and transpose all /mlp/ threads to /mlpol/
Sorry, unlike you I'm not a huge faggot who gets his rocks off by other people having a bad time, I just want to play with my horsies without seething jews and whites crying over some shekels. I saw plenty of opportunities where /mlp/ was shit and /mlpol/ could do it way better and people would have arrived at our doorstep, but it's useless if only one faggot sees that future, the rest of you want to eternally screech and doompaul yourselves so yes, it will never work. I just feel bad that apparently my ideas where more popular than I thought since I know some horsefuckers seemed to agree with me.
>dude just be a huge homo and transpose all /mlp/ threads to /mlpol/
Sorry, unlike you I'm not a huge faggot who gets his rocks off by other people having a bad time, I just want to play with my horsies without seething jews and whites crying over some shekels. I saw plenty of opportunities where /mlp/ was shit and /mlpol/ could do it way better and people would have arrived at our doorstep, but it's useless if only one faggot sees that future, the rest of you want to eternally screech and doompaul yourselves so yes, it will never work. I just feel bad that apparently my ideas where more popular than I thought since I know some horsefuckers seemed to agree with me.
>>6824
>but it's useless if only one faggot sees that future
What you want is a curated space for ponies only. Would you like to use /sp/ for it?
>but it's useless if only one faggot sees that future
What you want is a curated space for ponies only. Would you like to use /sp/ for it?
File (): F758E4671134007F2A8CF9A6991BDB3D-104930.png (102.5 KB, 640x480, 137080732527.png)
>>6825
No retard, what I want is a movement to take as many users from /mlp/ as possible and get the most creative board out of the thumb of the NSA and us military, and in doing so, create a fun space where I can play with ponies and not be harassed by jews and then banned for calling them out.
>>6826
Although I did think for a while in response to this thread being made at all what it would be like if I compromised and offered the idea of making a >green focused anime/pony hybrid board in the vein of /a/mlp/ with /mlp/ being the dominant board culture, your statement here >>6818 underlines the reason why I eventually discarded the idea. Branding does matter a lot when trying to get users to use a site, and I don't feel very many horsefuckers would come to the site specifically because of >nohooves. In the end, it's too much change, even if I would really like it.
So in other words no, I'm not just thinking about what I would personally like most, and no I don't want to go post alone on /sp/. If you can't figure that out after this many posts I'll call you out for at least being a troll.
No retard, what I want is a movement to take as many users from /mlp/ as possible and get the most creative board out of the thumb of the NSA and us military, and in doing so, create a fun space where I can play with ponies and not be harassed by jews and then banned for calling them out.
>>6826
Although I did think for a while in response to this thread being made at all what it would be like if I compromised and offered the idea of making a >green focused anime/pony hybrid board in the vein of /a/mlp/ with /mlp/ being the dominant board culture, your statement here >>6818 underlines the reason why I eventually discarded the idea. Branding does matter a lot when trying to get users to use a site, and I don't feel very many horsefuckers would come to the site specifically because of >nohooves. In the end, it's too much change, even if I would really like it.
So in other words no, I'm not just thinking about what I would personally like most, and no I don't want to go post alone on /sp/. If you can't figure that out after this many posts I'll call you out for at least being a troll.
>>6827
>No retard, what I want is a movement to take as many users from /mlp/ as possible
>and no I don't want to go post alone on /sp/
It is understandably, but you should begin at least with a "safe" place for you, in this case /sp/ is not a bad choice. If it doesn't grow, you will be the sole responsible.
>No retard, what I want is a movement to take as many users from /mlp/ as possible
>and no I don't want to go post alone on /sp/
It is understandably, but you should begin at least with a "safe" place for you, in this case /sp/ is not a bad choice. If it doesn't grow, you will be the sole responsible.
>>6828
hes back to being a huge jew and seething
Or horsefuckers could continue to post on /mlp/ and you can have nothing.
>>6829
>If it doesn't grow, you would be solely responsible
since this was the change I'll make it clear, No, I wont be solely responsible because I don't control the branding or really anything else about it. What kind of low effort jewery is this? It's like saying if I go try and turn a mcdonalds into a hotel I'll be the sole person at fault despite not being allowed to do anything to the decore or make the place not look like a fucking mcdonalds. What is your greater plan by suggesting shit like this? keep seething until you find something you can meme on to ruin the thread? keep getting (you)s from one faggot on /qa/? just following your jewish instincts? I assure you the stakes aren't so high you have to keep filling this thread with your low effort b8 but if you persist I'm just going to hide your ID.
hes back to being a huge jew and seething
Or horsefuckers could continue to post on /mlp/ and you can have nothing.
>>6829
>If it doesn't grow, you would be solely responsible
since this was the change I'll make it clear, No, I wont be solely responsible because I don't control the branding or really anything else about it. What kind of low effort jewery is this? It's like saying if I go try and turn a mcdonalds into a hotel I'll be the sole person at fault despite not being allowed to do anything to the decore or make the place not look like a fucking mcdonalds. What is your greater plan by suggesting shit like this? keep seething until you find something you can meme on to ruin the thread? keep getting (you)s from one faggot on /qa/? just following your jewish instincts? I assure you the stakes aren't so high you have to keep filling this thread with your low effort b8 but if you persist I'm just going to hide your ID.
>>6830
>No, I wont be solely responsible because I don't control the branding or really anything else about it.
That's the tools and means you got, you'll figure out.
>No, I wont be solely responsible because I don't control the branding or really anything else about it.
That's the tools and means you got, you'll figure out.
File (): 23449C31FA8ED25A7F2021A85EE4DE8E-890422.png (869.6 KB, 820x776, 23449C31FA8ED25A7F2021A85EE4DE8E-890422.png)
>>6819
Fun fact, with this staff it doesnt matter how sound your position is, if you're impolite you're automatically "in the wrong"
Fun fact, with this staff it doesnt matter how sound your position is, if you're impolite you're automatically "in the wrong"
File (): 9731C5EBC0CFF40E0D576D7AED9DA204-103159.png (100.7 KB, 317x336, cherry pony oooh.png)
>>6833
What I was saying is that I was polite, but I was still soundly rejected and my advice was basically mocked to my face. I chugged hard on phrasing it in that post though.
What I was saying is that I was polite, but I was still soundly rejected and my advice was basically mocked to my face. I chugged hard on phrasing it in that post though.
File (): 0232FD5965B6B3EC78D03240F364B94D-93947.png (91.7 KB, 299x348, 5srfx7.png)
>>6827
>create a fun space where I can play with ponies and not be harassed by jews and then banned for calling them out.
So you want to enable antisemitism and groups who hold such beliefs to flourish and be able to easily organize and attack others?
>create a fun space where I can play with ponies and not be harassed by jews and then banned for calling them out.
So you want to enable antisemitism and groups who hold such beliefs to flourish and be able to easily organize and attack others?
Im gonna take this opportunity to tell the grand story of:
How /a/ came to be
One day, Atlas asked me if he should make an /a/ board. I said (because I was the only staff on/responsive) "Yes".
And that, ladies and gentlemen, is how /a/ came to be.
The background is, there were staff who wanted an /a/ board, and staff who were absolutrly vehemently opposed to it, ostensibky because the /a/ board would somehow cause a coup to turn mlpol into nu-4chan or some shit?
Personally, I didnt think the site needed an /a/, but I also thought the people crying about the site being fundamentally changed were off their rocker. So I told Atlas he should.
Funny, the site hasnt gotten taken over by anime. Funny how that all worked out.
Personally, Im opposed to a pony blue board, I simply dont see the point.
All this 'we'll get more /mulp/' posturing neglects a key fact: people go to 4chan (and by proxy, mlp) for (you)s, because theres more people there.
Its why even before Elon bought it, there is 100 to 1 the number of users on twitter vs. Gab or wtfe else.
Anons are creatures of habit, and 4chan is where they go to get their fix.
Anyone else notice how quickly pony porn became less interesting the longer it wasnt prohibited? I mean, its not like there arent what, 5 boorus dedicated to pony everything?
But politics, politics has always been a no-go for a significant majority of the fandom. For many, politics is WHY they seek the escapism of pastel ponies.
I dont oppose a blue pony board because I think it'll change the site at all, I oppose a blue pony board because I dont buy that mulp is gonna suddenly (or even gradually) start migrating if there is one.
As I said, the customer isnt going to buy the product no matter how much of a promotion you give them, they have already made the decision and now they're just seeing what they can grt you to agree to for the social exchange.
How /a/ came to be
One day, Atlas asked me if he should make an /a/ board. I said (because I was the only staff on/responsive) "Yes".
And that, ladies and gentlemen, is how /a/ came to be.
The background is, there were staff who wanted an /a/ board, and staff who were absolutrly vehemently opposed to it, ostensibky because the /a/ board would somehow cause a coup to turn mlpol into nu-4chan or some shit?
Personally, I didnt think the site needed an /a/, but I also thought the people crying about the site being fundamentally changed were off their rocker. So I told Atlas he should.
Funny, the site hasnt gotten taken over by anime. Funny how that all worked out.
Personally, Im opposed to a pony blue board, I simply dont see the point.
All this 'we'll get more /mulp/' posturing neglects a key fact: people go to 4chan (and by proxy, mlp) for (you)s, because theres more people there.
Its why even before Elon bought it, there is 100 to 1 the number of users on twitter vs. Gab or wtfe else.
Anons are creatures of habit, and 4chan is where they go to get their fix.
Anyone else notice how quickly pony porn became less interesting the longer it wasnt prohibited? I mean, its not like there arent what, 5 boorus dedicated to pony everything?
But politics, politics has always been a no-go for a significant majority of the fandom. For many, politics is WHY they seek the escapism of pastel ponies.
I dont oppose a blue pony board because I think it'll change the site at all, I oppose a blue pony board because I dont buy that mulp is gonna suddenly (or even gradually) start migrating if there is one.
As I said, the customer isnt going to buy the product no matter how much of a promotion you give them, they have already made the decision and now they're just seeing what they can grt you to agree to for the social exchange.
File (): 6AFF38BE66D7519AC63FBAADB1E4C46B-120930.jpg (118.1 KB, 1200x1007, 536D088F48BCAA670E0B8302107FF58D-120912.jpg)
>>6841
this is why I also said it would take a long time and require people be on board. I don't, as you believe, think its pointless, but it definitely can be made pointless by defeatist attitude, ignorant strategy, and pure random chance that comes from risk taking I alluded to in the /mlp/a/ idea.
That said, I want to take a moment to define, not that I haven't, in clearer terms where /mlp/ is different than other boards. mlp is not like /a/, /tv/, /ck/ or the like. It's not a board that's centered around getting replies, but getting OC. Replies are a poormans currency on /mlp/. the real structure of the board is in content creators who give content for the (you)s of the /mlp/ rabble. in other words, unlike with a regular board where no matter how you scoop, you only get the same thing, if you where to turn content creators from the site to this one for any reason and have them come here, the masses would have less choice but to come here since that's where the content is. In the same way all of us put up with platforms like youtube, their individual investment is less important than the influence who creates OC.
There are of course ways to capture non-content creators, such as the people who hate eqg to an autistic degree, but the idea that /mlp/ is a typical board based around a symbol b8ing attention economy is simply not true. /mlp/ is a content creation board first and foremost, and a lot of the content and discussion there is simply time passing, not (you farming). the >green prompt rain dancing is as close as it gets to true farming, and the sheer lack of it on /mlpol/ is, I think, the biggest indication that it is /pol/ without gr15, rather than /mlp/ and /pol/ together as one
>>6844
Serious question:
What gives you confidence that making a pony blue board will result in content creators migrating?
Serious question:
What gives you confidence that making a pony blue board will result in content creators migrating?
File (): 1CA78788403417B3D25820BBB2F5AC6B-1159335.png (1.1 MB, 6000x4915, 1CA78788403417B3D25820BBB2F5AC6B-1159335.png)
>>6845
I don't have supreme confidence, but I have seen shit shows on /mlp/ by mods cause a massive amount of strife. at the time I came to the staff about creating such a board, the drama was hot, and I believe some of those people could have came here. Right now? It would be a way harder sell. which is also why I said from the beginning that you'd have to wait for people to get fed up. and since this place basically completely rejected the idea for so long, there's a danger that it wont work regardless. Situations like the scruffening, derpibooru, meta and divegrass threads being nuked, specific generals getting targeted. These are all opportunities, but once they are gone, they are gone. anonfilly has a home again, it will be a lot harder to get them to come back. My comments today where not an indication of some new chance or drama either. /mlp/ as of today is fairly stable. Only an acknowledgement that you've missed so many opportunities that occasionally I saw more pony OC being fostered in shitcords and being discussed there, even when those people still use and are from this website. Some how that couple of comments blew up into this. I'm significantly more used to yelling into the void and getting nothing back that I'm just as serious as your question when I say this thread is not what I expected to hear back.
I may at times be an asshole about being ignored, but it's not like I haven't passed up opportunities too, I'm jealous of the site's success and feel like it could have so easily taken some of 4chucks crown at times, but if we began tomorrow I couldn't tell you today an answer to that question that would be satisfactory. the things I do have clear ideas about I already gave; Give anons the ability to delet images in their own threads and be a mini janny. This isn't something I personally like, and for various reasons, if it's unpopular here as an idea, I would be all for not doing it, but I know it would get users specifically because of how autistic these faggots are. They make planning the con threads a huge fucking pain, and they also harrass the rewatch threads. Like I said, This isn't on the same level of advice as getting content creators, but it's an example of an opportunity. for the actual content creators, the thing that comes to mind is a place they would actually get (you)s in. but that's not a definitive plan to snag them at all, just a way to keep the ones we get instead of having them leave the second 4chan gets their act together.
No free lunch.
I don't have supreme confidence, but I have seen shit shows on /mlp/ by mods cause a massive amount of strife. at the time I came to the staff about creating such a board, the drama was hot, and I believe some of those people could have came here. Right now? It would be a way harder sell. which is also why I said from the beginning that you'd have to wait for people to get fed up. and since this place basically completely rejected the idea for so long, there's a danger that it wont work regardless. Situations like the scruffening, derpibooru, meta and divegrass threads being nuked, specific generals getting targeted. These are all opportunities, but once they are gone, they are gone. anonfilly has a home again, it will be a lot harder to get them to come back. My comments today where not an indication of some new chance or drama either. /mlp/ as of today is fairly stable. Only an acknowledgement that you've missed so many opportunities that occasionally I saw more pony OC being fostered in shitcords and being discussed there, even when those people still use and are from this website. Some how that couple of comments blew up into this. I'm significantly more used to yelling into the void and getting nothing back that I'm just as serious as your question when I say this thread is not what I expected to hear back.
I may at times be an asshole about being ignored, but it's not like I haven't passed up opportunities too, I'm jealous of the site's success and feel like it could have so easily taken some of 4chucks crown at times, but if we began tomorrow I couldn't tell you today an answer to that question that would be satisfactory. the things I do have clear ideas about I already gave; Give anons the ability to delet images in their own threads and be a mini janny. This isn't something I personally like, and for various reasons, if it's unpopular here as an idea, I would be all for not doing it, but I know it would get users specifically because of how autistic these faggots are. They make planning the con threads a huge fucking pain, and they also harrass the rewatch threads. Like I said, This isn't on the same level of advice as getting content creators, but it's an example of an opportunity. for the actual content creators, the thing that comes to mind is a place they would actually get (you)s in. but that's not a definitive plan to snag them at all, just a way to keep the ones we get instead of having them leave the second 4chan gets their act together.
No free lunch.
>>6845
oh, and for what it's worth. I dont know how popular anime is here, but it seems to be popular among the horsefuckers from here I talked to, so while I don't have any confidence a /mlp/a/ >green board would be a compelling way to steal /mlp/ users, it might be a way to colonize anime with /mlp/ board values, especially since /a/ does not allow /mlp/ board culture, and even fanfiction discussion is nuked from orbit. It isn't really my goal since it's a little too self indulgent of an idea but I can't say I wouldn't like it.
oh, and for what it's worth. I dont know how popular anime is here, but it seems to be popular among the horsefuckers from here I talked to, so while I don't have any confidence a /mlp/a/ >green board would be a compelling way to steal /mlp/ users, it might be a way to colonize anime with /mlp/ board values, especially since /a/ does not allow /mlp/ board culture, and even fanfiction discussion is nuked from orbit. It isn't really my goal since it's a little too self indulgent of an idea but I can't say I wouldn't like it.
File (): 1926C89B69727EF004A854B627BF6C56-360008.png (351.6 KB, 1039x705, 8qwrEfca.png)
>>6846
>I may at times be an asshole about being ignored
Well... this. You won't get far with that obnoxious attitude.
>I may at times be an asshole about being ignored
Well... this. You won't get far with that obnoxious attitude.
>>6819
>first of all, grow some awareness of your own shitflinging
Yeah, let's dissect this.
> if you go to bat and start talking about how you think other people are acting like kikes,
Hmm, was that what I said? Let's have a look shall we.
>>6803
You said this:
<if you replaced horsefuckers with whites you would be called a jew and told to kill yourself immediately.
I said more in context but this is what you're referring to when you said I "started talking about how other people act like kikes":
>Point is, if we're going to start screaming, "You're the real kike," here wouldn't you who wants to change a tradition while defaming the people in it that doesn't want to, be the real kike, mah nigguha.
It ends on period but grammatically should end on a questionmark. It's a rehtorical question to make a point about what you are doing. I didn't say you were a kike but even if I had it would been a response to you insinuating that I use jewish rethoric. I think the comparision falls flat there for you.
But again, I'm not offended about this part, which I also wrote in that post. I just thought it was weird that while there's a thread on /qa/ talking about the paranoia this thread received, you attack me for giving you genuine criticism. Go back over my posts. They are not personal whatsoever before you start and barely afterward either.
I kinda hate how some who are pro split has brunt bridges with me. As I said, I'm not against entertaining this idea but such a thing has to be done in a civilized manner. When I ask for substance and you attack me, it makes me think you have none.
> I don't know what /a/ is if you aren't referring to 4chan/a/ but if I had a guess this site tried an /a/ at some point and it failed? If so that's exactly why I said multiple times in this and the other thread that doing this is pointless as a temporary test the waters thing. You need patience and tenacity. People involved need to want to believe it will work and make inroads to make it happen. Otherwise yes, you will get a barren board that closes in 6 months of inactivity.
We have an /a/. Look at the board bar at the top and then the furthest board to the left. It's been there for years. Your making my point as well. You need content for it aka, "You need patiance and tenacity. People involved need to want to believe it will work and make inroad to make it happen." So content is king and is why mlpol is not as active on pony as /mlp/ create content and there will be people.
Why Anonfilly went back to 4chan had nothing to with politics, I believe. Most of the anonfillies went to discord before they went to us anyway. People complained in our thread that most people spent their time on discord instead of being on the board. When the thread on /mlp/ opened again, those on discord probably migrated there and those here probably left as well. Was this because polacks had harassed them with politics? No. I Lurked that thread from the beginning of it being here till now. Very few political discussions happened on it and most of that was just meming.
So why did the fillies go back to /mlp/ if the mods there are abusive and the polacks here don't bother them? Simple, the same reason you visit /mlp/ because that's where people are. There are more polacks on 4/pol/ still than there are polacks here, hundred precent. Creative people go were they get most attention and so that's where the greens are.
Also, I guess I should address that thinking of this as a brawl is your problem. I'm not at all closed to the idea that we could have a separate board for pony but I'd like to weigh the pros and cons for such a thing. It's a slippery slope to blame me for what other posters have posted that have similar views as me but I suppose I can relate to such a thing.
Again, I don't think your idea has no merits but I don't think it's going to result in what you imagine. I guess it's too late to start over but I genuinely think it would be more beneficial for us both if we could discuss this. Maybe you have some argument that I haven't considered that will make me be pro this split.
>first of all, grow some awareness of your own shitflinging
Yeah, let's dissect this.
> if you go to bat and start talking about how you think other people are acting like kikes,
Hmm, was that what I said? Let's have a look shall we.
>>6803
You said this:
<if you replaced horsefuckers with whites you would be called a jew and told to kill yourself immediately.
I said more in context but this is what you're referring to when you said I "started talking about how other people act like kikes":
>Point is, if we're going to start screaming, "You're the real kike," here wouldn't you who wants to change a tradition while defaming the people in it that doesn't want to, be the real kike, mah nigguha.
It ends on period but grammatically should end on a questionmark. It's a rehtorical question to make a point about what you are doing. I didn't say you were a kike but even if I had it would been a response to you insinuating that I use jewish rethoric. I think the comparision falls flat there for you.
But again, I'm not offended about this part, which I also wrote in that post. I just thought it was weird that while there's a thread on /qa/ talking about the paranoia this thread received, you attack me for giving you genuine criticism. Go back over my posts. They are not personal whatsoever before you start and barely afterward either.
I kinda hate how some who are pro split has brunt bridges with me. As I said, I'm not against entertaining this idea but such a thing has to be done in a civilized manner. When I ask for substance and you attack me, it makes me think you have none.
> I don't know what /a/ is if you aren't referring to 4chan/a/ but if I had a guess this site tried an /a/ at some point and it failed? If so that's exactly why I said multiple times in this and the other thread that doing this is pointless as a temporary test the waters thing. You need patience and tenacity. People involved need to want to believe it will work and make inroads to make it happen. Otherwise yes, you will get a barren board that closes in 6 months of inactivity.
We have an /a/. Look at the board bar at the top and then the furthest board to the left. It's been there for years. Your making my point as well. You need content for it aka, "You need patiance and tenacity. People involved need to want to believe it will work and make inroad to make it happen." So content is king and is why mlpol is not as active on pony as /mlp/ create content and there will be people.
Why Anonfilly went back to 4chan had nothing to with politics, I believe. Most of the anonfillies went to discord before they went to us anyway. People complained in our thread that most people spent their time on discord instead of being on the board. When the thread on /mlp/ opened again, those on discord probably migrated there and those here probably left as well. Was this because polacks had harassed them with politics? No. I Lurked that thread from the beginning of it being here till now. Very few political discussions happened on it and most of that was just meming.
So why did the fillies go back to /mlp/ if the mods there are abusive and the polacks here don't bother them? Simple, the same reason you visit /mlp/ because that's where people are. There are more polacks on 4/pol/ still than there are polacks here, hundred precent. Creative people go were they get most attention and so that's where the greens are.
Also, I guess I should address that thinking of this as a brawl is your problem. I'm not at all closed to the idea that we could have a separate board for pony but I'd like to weigh the pros and cons for such a thing. It's a slippery slope to blame me for what other posters have posted that have similar views as me but I suppose I can relate to such a thing.
Again, I don't think your idea has no merits but I don't think it's going to result in what you imagine. I guess it's too late to start over but I genuinely think it would be more beneficial for us both if we could discuss this. Maybe you have some argument that I haven't considered that will make me be pro this split.
>>6856
>People complained in our thread that most people spent their time on discord instead of being on the board.
>board
Should be thread.
>People complained in our thread that most people spent their time on discord instead of being on the board.
>board
Should be thread.
>>6841
The only problem with /a/ is that nobody uses it, tbh. If there were even two regularly-posted threads it would be on par with the other boards. It still gets more traffick than /cyb/.
I was personally of the camp that some of the other April 2017 boards could come back, but since our /sp/ stands for shitposting, /spa/ is kind of off the table.
The only problem with /a/ is that nobody uses it, tbh. If there were even two regularly-posted threads it would be on par with the other boards. It still gets more traffick than /cyb/.
I was personally of the camp that some of the other April 2017 boards could come back, but since our /sp/ stands for shitposting, /spa/ is kind of off the table.
>>6856
>It ends on period but grammatically should end on a questionmark. It's a rehtorical question to make a point about what you are doing
Right, I dont know why I expected someone so stupid and unself aware to even begin to acknowledge that the criticism instantly resulted in accusations of me being a divide and conquer kike. So yes, I did think pretty carefuly about what I said, I gave you exactly what you fucking deserved. Is that clear enough for you? or do you have another fantasy to concoct where you're the innocent victim here?
>It ends on period but grammatically should end on a questionmark. It's a rehtorical question to make a point about what you are doing
Right, I dont know why I expected someone so stupid and unself aware to even begin to acknowledge that the criticism instantly resulted in accusations of me being a divide and conquer kike. So yes, I did think pretty carefuly about what I said, I gave you exactly what you fucking deserved. Is that clear enough for you? or do you have another fantasy to concoct where you're the innocent victim here?
>>6863
Wow. A bit uppity today.
As an anon you may be called a kike at any time if you come with kiked ideas. You positively know this, so playing the offended party won't fly.
You may not be a normie, and yet you behave like one many times.
Wow. A bit uppity today.
As an anon you may be called a kike at any time if you come with kiked ideas. You positively know this, so playing the offended party won't fly.
You may not be a normie, and yet you behave like one many times.
File (): DB7A004B34CD87251B21375FFFEC267C-135872.jpg (132.7 KB, 1058x705, DF660A7CD1365502AA967591540E02F4-135854.jpg)
I'm pretty sure all or most of my points of concern have already been stated by other posters, but I'll contribute my thoughts anyways
I am not a fan of adding a new pony-only board at all.
The entire point of /mlpol/ is that it is a merged board. Two different topics come together in synchronicity. Segregating pony and politics is a why-bother that is contrary to the entire idea.
The argument I keep hearing for the segregation is that politics is a downer and black pilled. Have you even been on /mlp/? That board makes /mlpol/ look like radical utopians by comparison. At least a few years ago, you couldn't go anywhere without hearing "oh my God everything good is gone!" It is/was insufferable and was far worse than /mlpol/, at least at the time.
The reason most /mlp/ users don't come here isn't because of politics, it's because of the Social Media Effect. Chan sites, like all social media of any kind, are naturally occurring monopolies, because people want to go where other people already are. Having a board with no politics won't help that. If anything, it means less total activity.
But with all of that said, it isn't necessarily much harm to add an experimental board. I would want it to be more than just "/mlp/ but not owned by a Jap." Maybe make it /safe/ with a ban on doom-posting, or have some kind of theme to it like forced optimism. Maybe call it AFFWF (Aff woof?) for "A Future for White Foals" or something. You can at least have fun with the idea
I am not a fan of adding a new pony-only board at all.
The entire point of /mlpol/ is that it is a merged board. Two different topics come together in synchronicity. Segregating pony and politics is a why-bother that is contrary to the entire idea.
The argument I keep hearing for the segregation is that politics is a downer and black pilled. Have you even been on /mlp/? That board makes /mlpol/ look like radical utopians by comparison. At least a few years ago, you couldn't go anywhere without hearing "oh my God everything good is gone!" It is/was insufferable and was far worse than /mlpol/, at least at the time.
The reason most /mlp/ users don't come here isn't because of politics, it's because of the Social Media Effect. Chan sites, like all social media of any kind, are naturally occurring monopolies, because people want to go where other people already are. Having a board with no politics won't help that. If anything, it means less total activity.
But with all of that said, it isn't necessarily much harm to add an experimental board. I would want it to be more than just "/mlp/ but not owned by a Jap." Maybe make it /safe/ with a ban on doom-posting, or have some kind of theme to it like forced optimism. Maybe call it AFFWF (Aff woof?) for "A Future for White Foals" or something. You can at least have fun with the idea
>>6866
>now that everyone else has done my job for me, I'll just saunter in and pretend to do something
>now that everyone else has done my job for me, I'll just saunter in and pretend to do something
>>6866
These seem like mostly fair points. I still think we could benefit to experiment a bit with boards, although my opnion on the matter isn't that strong.
These seem like mostly fair points. I still think we could benefit to experiment a bit with boards, although my opnion on the matter isn't that strong.
So what is the progress on developing such board so far? Are we even going to get it?
>>6873
From what I understand, it doesn't actually take that long to make a board. It's only a matter of approval.
From what I understand, it doesn't actually take that long to make a board. It's only a matter of approval.
>>6876
/sp/ is a random board, named after sportschan after a series of back and fourth raids while John Elway memes were all the rage.
/sp/ is a random board, named after sportschan after a series of back and fourth raids while John Elway memes were all the rage.
>>6873
The decision lies ultimately with staff. It used to be that a specific staff member would take ownership/responibility of whatever board. /vx/ for example, is Lotus' purview, while John Elway - who is Football forevermore, appearing in the guise of a man, but inseparable from either the one True Football or the Denver Broncos, who are themselves Football but on a multitudinal level - has sole and exclusive dominion over Fottball, for he is the Alpha and Omega of Football, supplemented by the storage rooms in space assisting in the housing of all that Football.
Sorry, havent broncoposted in a while.
Returning to the topic, a specific staff member would technically need to do likewise with this new board. Having said, that precious requirement is a bit arbitrary IMO and fosters a 'thats not my board so IDGAF' mentality in some (thats just a general caveat, not aomething directed at anyone in general/particular).
Now, when I say about the decision, I mean it literally. It will likely take more than a handful of anons clamoring to make a sufficiently compelling case, and I say that having personally made dozens of compelling cases.
Not a criticism, but with a few very specific examples, staff does not operate from a very 'quick-to-action' sort of strategy.
Tl;dr. Get comfy, and prepare to politely make your case for a drawn out period of time. Dont insult staff either, they get really mad and oppose you on principal when you do that (yes, even if they have been insulting you extensively prior, and your insults are reactionary/complementary).
>>6875
Technically speaking, unless the code has been ammended, any staff member could make a new board at any time. Literally, a few clicks and a few lines of text. While cumbersome in other ways, there are a goodly number of ways that Pupper's code is quite efficient.
The problem is that any staff member who MIGHT make such a thread in advance of a staff consensus woumd immediately be decided to have 'gone rogue' or any number of other character assassinations.
If you're not getting how UNwelcome it is to be on staff AND decisive, I dont know what to tell you
The decision lies ultimately with staff. It used to be that a specific staff member would take ownership/responibility of whatever board. /vx/ for example, is Lotus' purview, while John Elway - who is Football forevermore, appearing in the guise of a man, but inseparable from either the one True Football or the Denver Broncos, who are themselves Football but on a multitudinal level - has sole and exclusive dominion over Fottball, for he is the Alpha and Omega of Football, supplemented by the storage rooms in space assisting in the housing of all that Football.
Sorry, havent broncoposted in a while.
Returning to the topic, a specific staff member would technically need to do likewise with this new board. Having said, that precious requirement is a bit arbitrary IMO and fosters a 'thats not my board so IDGAF' mentality in some (thats just a general caveat, not aomething directed at anyone in general/particular).
Now, when I say about the decision, I mean it literally. It will likely take more than a handful of anons clamoring to make a sufficiently compelling case, and I say that having personally made dozens of compelling cases.
Not a criticism, but with a few very specific examples, staff does not operate from a very 'quick-to-action' sort of strategy.
Tl;dr. Get comfy, and prepare to politely make your case for a drawn out period of time. Dont insult staff either, they get really mad and oppose you on principal when you do that (yes, even if they have been insulting you extensively prior, and your insults are reactionary/complementary).
>>6875
Technically speaking, unless the code has been ammended, any staff member could make a new board at any time. Literally, a few clicks and a few lines of text. While cumbersome in other ways, there are a goodly number of ways that Pupper's code is quite efficient.
The problem is that any staff member who MIGHT make such a thread in advance of a staff consensus woumd immediately be decided to have 'gone rogue' or any number of other character assassinations.
If you're not getting how UNwelcome it is to be on staff AND decisive, I dont know what to tell you
as someone who's been here since the beginning I don't see a reason to *not* have a blue board with the sole exception that someone trying to shill and such should still be flooded with pony poon to drive them off
the jew fears pone puss
the jew fears pone puss
>>6880
Tbh, I think most people who'd post to the blue pony board wouldn't be deterred by pony porn, only annoyed.
Horse porn only deters redditors on the /pol/ side.
Tbh, I think most people who'd post to the blue pony board wouldn't be deterred by pony porn, only annoyed.
Horse porn only deters redditors on the /pol/ side.
[Reply] [Last 50 Posts] [Last 100 Posts] [Last 200 Posts]
You are viewing older replies. Click [View All] or [Last n Posts] to vew latest posts.
Clicking update will load all posts posted after last post on this page.
Post pagination: [Prev] [1-100] [101-200] [201-284] [Next] [Live (last 100 replies)]
284 replies | 136 files | 71 UUIDs | Page 4