Could we get more word filters on this site? They really made 4chan fun in the past especially on /b/ and we could use them to fuck with raiders. My suggestions:
Chud > Chad
Chudster > Chadster
C H U D > C H A D
Black people > niggers
Transfolks/trans folks > trannies
POC > darkies
Gay people > faggots
LGBTQ > faggot brigade
Communism > planned starvation
Marx > hungry Santa
Marxism > gimme free shit
>>5217Lolz and pissing of leftists.
>>5218And you think a word filter will do that? Like, seriously? Take ur meds
I see no strong reason to implement this. It's not like these phrases are a lot used in the first place. The community is already somewhat insulated from shills and detractors.
It's an idea though.
Implementing the filters you described would probably cause more disruption/annoyance than lulz, imo. Since leftists don't generally browse /mlpol/, the filters would generally only apply to Anons posting ironically, or Anons quoting from other sources.
I have to disagree with this idea. Perhaps it's well-intended, but I don't think it would be very good in practice.
>>5216>Could we get more word filters on this site?Distorting the language is a jew tactic to tamper communication.
Let's not fall for it.
>>5222Trips confirm.
I think Thrackerzod is more than enough for this site.
>>5216>Black people > niggers >Transfolks/trans folks > tranniesthis could be funny when (((they))) come rading
>>5219t. butthurt tranny
>>5238Especially the anti-psychotics
Since i don't want to make a new thread but kind of related.
Could you guys consider banning wojack shit on sight? With the recent influx i've seen more of them and it's something that's cancer inducing and i'm worried it will eventually lead to a bad patch.
>>5260>dont want to make a new threadThis thread is fine, or QTDDTOT is also a good choice
>ban wojak on sightWhen it's an obvious 'raid', that's the current MO. However wojak is a long-standing meme that unless posted outside of the existing rules would be unenforceable for BoS. Your inquiry has been raised, but it's highly improbable tbh.
>>5261I see. Yeah fair enough. Just hate seeing that nowadays because frankly most of its variations are simply shit and many of them are made in a bad faith if that makes sense.
>>5216Some of these are funny but world filters can be absolutely insufferable in genuine conversation.