Could we get more word filters on this site? They really made 4chan fun in the past especially on /b/ and we could use them to fuck with raiders. My suggestions:
Chud > Chad
Chudster > Chadster
C H U D > C H A D
Black people > niggers
Transfolks/trans folks > trannies
POC > darkies
Gay people > faggots
LGBTQ > faggot brigade
Communism > planned starvation
Marx > hungry Santa
Marxism > gimme free shit
/qa/ - Questions and Answers
Keeping the community together by giving you a voice
File (): 14605F2DF61AD0C6FA58741A077A7C56-784640.png (766.3 KB, 600x2644, 14605F2DF61AD0C6FA58741A077A7C56-784640.png)
Anonymous
No.5220
I see no strong reason to implement this. It's not like these phrases are a lot used in the first place. The community is already somewhat insulated from shills and detractors.
It's an idea though.
It's an idea though.
Anonymous
No.5221
Implementing the filters you described would probably cause more disruption/annoyance than lulz, imo. Since leftists don't generally browse /mlpol/, the filters would generally only apply to Anons posting ironically, or Anons quoting from other sources.
I have to disagree with this idea. Perhaps it's well-intended, but I don't think it would be very good in practice.
I have to disagree with this idea. Perhaps it's well-intended, but I don't think it would be very good in practice.
>>5216
>Could we get more word filters on this site?
Distorting the language is a jew tactic to tamper communication.
Let's not fall for it.
>Could we get more word filters on this site?
Distorting the language is a jew tactic to tamper communication.
Let's not fall for it.
Anonymous
No.5237
File (): E4A5619E628766AAC7C0F86439D742E6-74721.jpg (73.0 KB, 600x631, They fight nazis, they are the good guys.jpg)
Since i don't want to make a new thread but kind of related.
Could you guys consider banning wojack shit on sight? With the recent influx i've seen more of them and it's something that's cancer inducing and i'm worried it will eventually lead to a bad patch.
Could you guys consider banning wojack shit on sight? With the recent influx i've seen more of them and it's something that's cancer inducing and i'm worried it will eventually lead to a bad patch.
>>5260
>dont want to make a new thread
This thread is fine, or QTDDTOT is also a good choice
>ban wojak on sight
When it's an obvious 'raid', that's the current MO. However wojak is a long-standing meme that unless posted outside of the existing rules would be unenforceable for BoS. Your inquiry has been raised, but it's highly improbable tbh.
>dont want to make a new thread
This thread is fine, or QTDDTOT is also a good choice
>ban wojak on sight
When it's an obvious 'raid', that's the current MO. However wojak is a long-standing meme that unless posted outside of the existing rules would be unenforceable for BoS. Your inquiry has been raised, but it's highly improbable tbh.
Anonymous
No.5263
>>5261
I see. Yeah fair enough. Just hate seeing that nowadays because frankly most of its variations are simply shit and many of them are made in a bad faith if that makes sense.
I see. Yeah fair enough. Just hate seeing that nowadays because frankly most of its variations are simply shit and many of them are made in a bad faith if that makes sense.