>>1990jesus christ, how long until they get bored and leave?
They won't. They got raped hard over the GET so now they not only want the 55555 they are also trying to throw 32chan under the bus
>>1992are the mods/admins here able to freeze posting? if so, we can snipe our own 55555 get and make them fuck off, hopefully.
>>1993That would be an abuse of power anon, a big no no for us mods
>>1994if enough people got on board and everything was explained thoroughly, would it be theoretically possible though?
Hope no one here falls for the trap /sp/ is setting up on /int*/
That user post on both sites and is attempting for us to raid it
>>1995I feel like freezing the board to stop a raid is like committing suicide so you wont get murdered
>>1997fair enough, I'll stop with the bad ideas for now.
>>1998hey don't feel that way guy we might still do it it's just not at the top of my to do list
/int*/ has even called them out too
Again, THIS IS NOT A RAID BY /int*/ THIS IS A FALSE FLAG. /sp/ IS BEHIND IT.
Now /sp/ is pretending to be us.
They REALLY want us off their site to the point of starting a war. I can not wait for both of us to pay them a visit
>>2000Speaking of gets, welcome to the 21st century, /qa/.
>>2004/int*/ has not done anything to us. Cross posters from /sp/ who use /int*/ are attempting to start a war
>>200532ch.org/inta/res/12511.html
>>2006Yes, that is the thread started by /sp/
>>2008I'm the Shopfag from here. Tell me, what do you think about rule 10?
>>2009I don't know rule 10. I don't know that /int*/ is fucking with you pretty bad right now and trying to blame it on /sp/
/sp/ nice try. /int*/ has done nothing to us. Your cross poster is failing hard
>>2009*I do know that /int*/ is fucking with you
>false flagging /int*/
All the keks. /sp/ you are our bitch for a long time
>>2010If they were trying to blame it on someone else, they wouldn't put "/int*" in every post.
>>2014fuck off a/sp/ie before we destroy your shitty board and teach you a lesson
(Your posting history tells a different story) >>2046I disagree. Evidently there is only one from e/sp/ who did anything "to" Mlpol, and in the process made apparent a structural weakness that most certainly would have been exploited during a less opportune moment. I DO think it was kind of fucked, but w/e.
>rule 10 is for ITT >>2047Only one? Looks to me like at minimum two
>>2048As far as home boards, I only know of one from sp but idfk