/qa/ - Questions and Answers

On second though that's kind of a bad idea

>>14
2DRandom was a /jp/ puppet state. They dont need to have a place to stay.

There once was a time where /qa/ tried to be the 4chan-historians. It was very comfy but there was no resistance to subversion.

>>13
I agree. /qajp/ isn't welcome, but I wouldn't mind if they kept a happening meta thread up here. They are kind of stuck without a board right now. [s4s] killed their last one.

>>32
Mods, what do you think of letting /qa/fugees onto this board?

>>36
Actually, looking at s4s, they are claiming that they have somewhere off site, and in any case they seem to be at least surviving against the natives

All fucking weebs must fucking hang.

>>13
I don't really mind if they were allowed to colonise here. I think they only one we hold a grude against is the guy who keeps spamming the barneyfag.jpeg.
Neither side is free of guilt in all of this but I think us giving the olive branch would symbolise our dedication to making something better then 4chan.
And more traffic is always a good thing right?

>>13
I personally welcome this, as long as /jp/ doesn't come along with them.

>>38
https://desuarchive.org/meta/
you mean this site?

They reap what they sow

Also the problem i see with hosting qa refugees is wjat qa is used for. Its usually for complaints/concerns/metaposting right? Having 4qa here doesnt really help since we have no power over 4chan

Why would you want them here? They're all scum.