God is dead and we killed him
Can a Baptist Protestant discuss a few thing with you on here?
Jesus loves you anons, you need only seek him out.>>100696
should we talk about how the catholic church was founded by Christ himself, and how nailing a list of complaints to the door is rude?
We sure can. And we can also discuss why you pray to moral men and women? After all, the people of Israel once worshiped God before becoming corrupt. I see some of that in the Catholics.
But as long as you worship Jesus Christ, I think we will find at least some common ground.
the sephardic jews were kin to Jesus but betrayed and killed him. Worse still the ashkenazi are just eastern european devil worshipers who adopted the religion 800 years ago to cover up their worship of baal, moloch, and saturn. God is forgiving but not lenient sins that are not confessed or repented for will not be excused many people have and are going to hell.>>100703
well for one thing it nearly made europe into a muslim land>>100705
what mortal men and women do you speak of?
Mary, Peter, and other various saints. Or does the Catholic faith still hold to praying to them?
And my goal isn’t to complain about Catholics or say your absolutely wrong, but to learn something and discuss some differences. Hope you understand.
When we Catholics pray to saints we pray to them as intercessors before God. They preceded us on their spiritual journey and thus can relate to our specific troubles. That's why there's a patron saint for just about everything. Worship is reserved for God alone.
The Catholic Church had also become corrupt in the fifth and sixth centuries, in the tenth century, and in the 15th and 16th centuries. Every time it reformed itself from within and it will do so again with devout members inspired by God.
We all are allies in the fight against the degeneracy of Satan.
Though I see no big fault in this, I believe saints can’t do anything for me because they are simply that, saints. Sure they did great things, but they hold no heavenly power. I believe God alone is to receive my prayers as He is the only one that has the power to help me. Do you see where I’m coming from? Can you explain how they have power to intercede for me?
prayer may be held in the name of those touched by God, people he has worked through, or those that lived their life in service of him, but the person you pray to is always God himself or more specifically to the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit who are all one being and that is God.>>100713
the church has it's faults as it is run by humans who are unlike God are flawed and may become corrupt, but you must put you faith in the words of Jesus Christ>Matthew 16:18>And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not overcome it.
our lord and savior himself founded the church and assured Peter that damnation would not overcome it. Whatever the problems with the church today a good catholic should simply trust in the Providence of Christ.
it's true that dead mortals even if canonized cannot assist you now, but you misunderstand the veneration of saints. They are saints because of the miracles associated with them which are a result of God working through them, so through them we pray to God for such divine assistance if we truly need and deserve it. The saints themselves are not really and should not be worshiped as they are merely servants of God such as we all should be in life.
While reading the Bible is wonderful, and learning is a worthwhile pursuit, make sure you also take the time to pray anon.
The NAB (New American Bible) it is by far the WORST translation of all! There is No worse version of the bible than the NAB. The hands down best translation of all goes to the classic Douay-Rheims http://www.drbo.org/
When it comes to translations it is the hand down most accurate and best one of all. The translation is from the 1600s and is the most pure of all translations.
The NAB goes so far as to change the holy spirit from a HE into a Gender neutral terms!http://www.conservapedia.com/New_American_Bible
Trust me if you want a REAL catholic bible that is accurate, untouched by the Baby boomers that ruined the church and you don't know latin so you can't read the Vulgate the Douay Rheims is the BEST translation.
for those who do wish to read the bible for the first time I have to recommend Jeff Cavins's "The Great Adventure" bible study! The pic is the order to read the books in if you want a nice chronological order for each book to follow the timeline of the Israelites up to Jesus and the early church.
And make sure you use the Douay Rheims trust me WAY more accurate than the NAB!
I’ll have a go I do enjoy reading
as long as you're not reading some horrible protestant tripe like the English Standard Version which is missing 7 entire books you'll be fine, just make sure it's Catholic and has all the books. As for which Catholic translation is best that's simple enough to leave as a personal and subjective choice. Dougay-Rheims has it's own issues for example it does the KJV thing and translates both Gehenna and Sheol as "Hell" NABRE just transliterates them to Gehenna and Sheol.
My personal favorite is King James Version. Is this one any good in your opinion?
scofield bible Is worst correct
the church of england is not Catholic anon, the KJV is missing 7 books and is not recognized by the Catholic Church.
Right, I’m the crazy baptist here. I will try and follow along with you discussions and learn a thing or two, but I’m not catholic. I will just have to look up some texts because the KJV is what I have physically in front of me.
Yeah KJV is missing books and in incomplete. If you are Catholic stick with the Douay Rheims or Revised Standard trust me they are the best translations.
The Douay Rheims is the most pure translation of all. The NAB has been twisted and altered by the useless ass boomers that make up the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. The USCCB is a true insult to the church and twisted Vatican II to be what it is today. It is why some Catholic Churches are nearly Protestant when it comes to their mass!
I haven’t looked much into those books that were removed in the KJV, but I hope to learn why they should be in there then. Your going to have to do some explaining as I’m quite set in my baptist teaching.
Yes but the Douay Rheims is as close to those as we can get. The NAB butchers the word of the Bible it is an insult!
Ah, that’s another thing I don’t understand. Who are the popes and why is what they say so important to Catholics? I find it both fascinating and worrisome at the same time. I have been taught that the source for God’s commandments is in the Bible. Now Catholics believe the pope can make a command and it is near equal if not equal to a holy command correct?
So when I hear popes confirming something to be true, that may have weight to a Catholic but to me it means little. Can you explain some about popes?
The NAB has had a rough life from the start. Each time the NAB was translate the Vatican sent it back because they messed it up by trying to modernize it. The NAB is part of the "Modernization" movement of the church that took place in the 60s and 70s. This "Modernization" movement is why most new parishes are missing the beauty and look of the past and why many old church have been "Renovated" and made to look like Protestant churches. I grew up in Detroit and Seen it first hand these old beautiful church that were GUTTED by the Evil Cardinal Maida! He had a group of designers that would come in and "Fix" churches. These "fixers" would destroy the high alters, move the Priest to the middle and the tabernacle to the side. Remove the Communion Rail so people could take communion on the hand instead of at the rail! This Modernization movement is why the church is so messed up if you want to see the embodiment of it look at Our Pope Francis the man is the last breath of the boomer generation's control on the church once he is out the church can finally recover and return to it's REAL Catholic Roots pre Vatican II era ideals and bible translations.
anon I already quoted this verse once before in this thread please pay attention>Matthew 16:18>And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not overcome it.
The Catholic Church was created by Jesus our lord and savior himself and he also named Peter as the first pope. This is the mandate of Christ. Here's some info on infallibility http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07790a.htm>>100765
Both you and the anon above seem very concerned with the ins and outs and failings of the Catholic Church, but it doesn't matter even if Pope francis is corrupt and trying to change or damage the Church it doesn't really matter as Jesus told Peter that hell would not overcome his Church. Trust in Christ and the Bible the issues in the church will be resolved by the true believers, doubt is a tool of the devil as much as is the infiltration you're worried about.
Correct, but how can we have more popes? They are no longer chosen by the Lord. How can we mortals pick a pope? I’m sorry for not catching on quickly, but this is a concept I struggle with. You don’t have to explain it if it is tedious, but I was just wondering.
the seat of the new covenant exists where there once was a seat of the old covenant (seat of moses) and the bishop of rome sits upon this seat, and the ordained priests have the authority to bind and loosen. Having a pope isn't only theologically correct and has been taught by the Church since it's very beginning under Peter, but also redpilled. The monarchial structure ensures we always have a heading, and the way the Church is set up (with divine and systematic protection against the Pope teaching heresy) every Pope is theologically conservative no matter how hard he tries not to be, even pope francis, giving us consistency through out the centuries. The church is the invincible ark, given to us by christ after himself after realizing our spiritual needs through walking the earth as human himself, with which man can sail through ages and survive the filth being purged by gods providence thereunder.>>100771
God still loves you anon even if you're a protestant, if you confess your heresy to the Church and repent you can still be forgiven.
I'M NOT ALONEIn all honesty any Catholic I've met (even my friends) has been a real ass because I'm not. Even going as far as to tell me things like "You're possessed by demons cuz you ain't catholic" and "you don't truely believe in Jesus so he doesn't love you." Really offputting, but I wish you all the best of luck in your walk of faith. Catholic or Protestant
I grew up and I am a VERY traditional Catholic. Large family, Latin Mass, home Seton catechism from K-8, personal bible study, Jeff Cavins, Studied the writings and lessons of Monsignor Sawher, attended the masses of Father Perrone. My Church and my faith are a major part of me and my existence, because of this witnessing Pope Francis and the USCCB destroy the Church I love and is easily the Center of my life truly angers me! The Future of the Church is in her Past the Future of the Faith is in her past the ONLY way for Catholicism to advance and to restore our numbers and faith is to turn back to the ideals of Pre Vatican II Catholicism and embrace what made us great!
Pic of Then vs Now
So if I’m not catholic, am I a heretic? Does that exclude me from heaven to your faith, even though I believe on Jesus Christ, believe in his death, burial, and resurrection, and have confessed this with my mouth to Him?
any Catholic who would say such things is no true Catholic at all, Jesus loves all the children of God even the sinners. The Church he founded is always there for you if you want to confess your sins and seek his forgiveness>>100776>>100777>>100778
As I have explained more than once in this thread; Jesus himself created the Catholic Church and the practice of having a pope and told Peter the gates of hades will not overcome his Church. While there may be problems or even servants of the devil that try to corrupt things and it's fine to criticize the pope or the clergy but to lose faith in the Church itself is to question the words of Christ who died on the cross to save us. Simply put it's heresy, the Church may be flawed because people are flawed but it is still the Church our lord founded and left to us, so you must have faith that his will shall overcome any corruption.
to clarify it's fine to take issue with Francis or things done by those who serve the church or any such thing concerning the actions of mortal men, but to go against the Catholic Church itself to rebel against the idea of it is to go against Jesus Christ as it is his church. This is supported by the Bible.
That’s what I am here to learn. So please share more verse to support what you say. There must be more verses to help me understand this concept.
The whole ((them)) thing only applies to Francis TBH and that is because Francis is the last of an Era the Baby boomer Era. The Church will restore it self and go back to it's roots once he leaves. If you want to see a good Pope look at Pope Benedict.>>100780
The Events of the modern world and Modern churches were Shown to Pope Leo XIII back in the 1800s. Pope Leo put together the Prayer to St Michael the Archangel to protect us to prevent this and it was said at the end of all masses globally in an attempt to prevent the modern church and the disintegration of the modern world. But the Members of the Vatican II ordered it removed in the 1960s. God Told us what to do to save us to protect us to prevent this corruption and we ignored it! We went out of our way to disobey our Lord! The only hope for us now is for those who betrayed us to die off and the next generation try to restore the Church to what it should be!
It is up to US as the next Generation of Catholics to Push the ideals of our past and what makes us Catholic in our perishes to BE the Change we want and to make the next generation of the Church it is our DUTY as Catholics to restore our Church! It is our Divine DUTY to stand in the way of the Boomer gen and stop the corruption to push the traditional ways to block the protestant songs at our masses, to receive communion on the tongue vs the hand, to become teacher at our local churches and be part of the catechism programs and teach the next generation of Catholics the ideals of the church not the watered down garbage the boomers feed them! We must push the truth to children when we have them, ensure they are taught and understand the word of our Lord and not easy pickings for atheists.
Matthew 28:16-20>The Great Commission
16 Then the eleven disciples went to Galilee, to the mountain where Jesus had told them to go. 17 When they saw him, they worshiped him; but some doubted. 18 Then Jesus came to them and said, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. 19 Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20 and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age.”
Acts 2:1-31>The Holy Spirit Comes at Pentecost
2 When the day of Pentecost came, they were all together in one place. 2 Suddenly a sound like the blowing of a violent wind came from heaven and filled the whole house where they were sitting. 3 They saw what seemed to be tongues of fire that separated and came to rest on each of them. 4 All of them were filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak in other tongues[a] as the Spirit enabled them.
5 Now there were staying in Jerusalem God-fearing Jews from every nation under heaven. 6 When they heard this sound, a crowd came together in bewilderment, because each one heard their own language being spoken. 7 Utterly amazed, they asked: “Aren’t all these who are speaking Galileans? 8 Then how is it that each of us hears them in our native language? 9 Parthians, Medes and Elamites; residents of Mesopotamia, Judea and Cappadocia, Pontus and Asia,[b] 10 Phrygia and Pamphylia, Egypt and the parts of Libya near Cyrene; visitors from Rome 11 (both Jews and converts to Judaism); Cretans and Arabs—we hear them declaring the wonders of God in our own tongues!” 12 Amazed and perplexed, they asked one another, “What does this mean?”
13 Some, however, made fun of them and said, “They have had too much wine.”
Peter Addresses the Crowd
14 Then Peter stood up with the Eleven, raised his voice and addressed the crowd: “Fellow Jews and all of you who live in Jerusalem, let me explain this to you; listen carefully to what I say. 15 These people are not drunk, as you suppose. It’s only nine in the morning! 16 No, this is what was spoken by the prophet Joel:
“‘In the last days, God says,
I will pour out my Spirit on all people.
Your sons and daughters will prophesy,
your young men will see visions,
your old men will dream dreams.
Even on my servants, both men and women,
I will pour out my Spirit in those days,
and they will prophesy.
I will show wonders in the heavens above
and signs on the earth below,
blood and fire and billows of smoke.
The sun will be turned to darkness
and the moon to blood
before the coming of the great and glorious day of the Lord.
And everyone who calls
on the name of the Lord will be saved.’[c]
22 “Fellow Israelites, listen to this: Jesus of Nazareth was a man accredited by God to you by miracles, wonders and signs, which God did among you through him, as you yourselves know. 23 This man was handed over to you by God’s deliberate plan and foreknowledge; and you, with the help of wicked men,[d] put him to death by nailing him to the cross. 24 But God raised him from the dead, freeing him from the agony of death, because it was impossible for death to keep its hold on him. 25 David said about him:
“‘I saw the Lord always before me.
Because he is at my right hand,
I will not be shaken.
Therefore my heart is glad and my tongue rejoices;
my body also will rest in hope,
because you will not abandon me to the realm of the dead,
you will not let your holy one see decay.
You have made known to me the paths of life;
you will fill me with joy in your presence.’[e]
29 “Fellow Israelites, I can tell you confidently that the patriarch David died and was buried, and his tomb is here to this day. 30 But he was a prophet and knew that God had promised him on oath that he would place one of his descendants on his throne. 31 Seeing what was to come, he spoke of the resurrection of the Messiah, that he was not abandoned to the realm of the dead, nor did his body see decay.
I guess to sum it up, I have no problems with Catholics. I have made an attempt to learn from my Catholic friend about his faith, but he always gets so condicending and rude that I can't handle it. I understand your guys points of veiw, but I do not share some of them.
But I hope we can reach a point where despite our differences we help eachother. We can teach eachother, and learn.
I again want to say I hope the best for all of you in your faith, and God bless you
also read Matthew 16:13-20, Mark 8:27–30 and Luke 9:18–20 for the Confession of Peter where Christ designates Peter as the "rock" upon which Christ's church will be built. Naming him as the first bishop of Rome or in other words the Pope who sits on the seat of his new covenant
And everyone that calls on the name of the Lord shall be saved.
So, which is it? Only those that are part of the original church or everyone that calls on the name of the Lord? I don’t mean to be rude, I’m just trying to gain the understanding I need.
Just read those scriptures, but from what I gather, I realize I am probably wrong, it sounds like Jesus set up Peter as the only pope. It didn’t say that the keys of the kingdom of heaven would be passed down to anyone else. It sounds like a leadship position to build the church. The Bible has made mention of traits and gifts that pass down before and this, from my understanding, doesn’t come off as one that does.
like I said it''s fine to be critical of the papacy or the clergy or anything to do with the actions of mortal men even those that serve the church. The issue especially with protestants is losing faith in the Roman Catholic Church itself as it was founded by Jesus Christ our lord and savior. He left it to us so we should believe in it as we believe in him, any issues that arise within it shall be overcome by our faith in Jesus.>>100791
the issue again is that Jesus himself founded the church, it's existence and practices such as the papacy are based on his words so the Roman Catholic Church is the church of Christ, therefor to go against it is to go against him. In other words heresy. I believe at the very least all who believe in Jesus shall not be outright condemned for transgressions like this since I believe that both Martin Luther himself as well as most protestants are sincere in their beliefs so I assume they will be given a chance to confess and repent for this in purgatory so as to seek out the forgiveness of God even if they do not do so here on earth. In other words it's what could be called an "honest mistake"
yes and then Peter consecrated Linus. It's not that Peter was the only pope the pope is just the bishop of Rome who sits on the seat of the new covenant exists where there once was a seat of the old covenant. Ordained priests have the authority to name a new bishop in Rome as anywhere else. Peter acts in the stead of Christ just as any priest is called upon to act in the person of Christ so it's entirely legitimate for him to have named a new pope and so on from there.
That’s where I can’t agree with you. If Peter did place a pope to be his replacement, that doesn’t transfer the power Jesus Christ gave, or Jesus would have told him that this was the case.
And further more, no mortal can be here in place for Christ as no one else is perfect and born from a virgin. You can convince me a pope can provide excellent morals, guidance on spiritual matters, and even provide wisdom beyond what we normal have, but to start to equate man with the Son of God pushes it too far. A pope may be here in place of Peter, but never Christ.
he was acting in the person of Christ as the pope his actions were those of God this relates to the idea of infallibility. The vicar of Christ is of course not literally Christ, but Jesus named Peter as the "rock" on which he'd found his church which is the Roman Catholic Church. I'm not the one who's telling you that the pope is here on earth in place of Jesus rather it's something Jesus said himself. We are not to question the words of our Lord, we must have faith in his providence. Jesus appointed Peter as well as called on his his disciples to carry on his work here on earth in his place.
Jesus Christ is not an idol and the Jews are going to Hell for rejecting and killing him. As the angel Gabriele informed the virgin Mary Jesus is God himself, as well as a human, and the son of God. God became a human so as to walk among us and teach us the truth.
Agreed, shall we united to clense this (((heresy))) while we work out our differences?
I've been lurking, I just know a heretic when I see one. Let's dispel of this heresy at once!
god can be whatever he wants to,(((anon)))
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth
This is the Jewish promised Messiah as promised in Genesis 3:15
And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and this shalt bruise his heel.
And further proof of this is in Psalm 22 which describes the death at the cross of Jesus Christ.
When the Jews killed Jesus, they refused God’s Son and they became the Jews we all know and hate.
Nothing like some good ol' heresy to unite us despite our differences>Deus Vult's into the distance
Historical fact: your "jesus" never existed. It was a creation of the judeo-orthodoxy by mixing the fables of: Mithra, Hellenic Greece, and ACTUAL HUNDREDS of "Sun-God" myths together.
Then why do Jews hate Christians so much, to the point of writing in their books that Christians are worse than pagans to them?
because we are right.
that's nothing, the reason they're called kikes in the first place is due to how much they hate Jesus Christ>The word kike was born on Ellis Island when there were Jewish migrants who were also illiterate (or could not use Latin alphabet letters). When asked to sign the entry-forms with the customary "X", the Jewish immigrants would refuse, because they associated an X with the cross of Christianity. Instead, they drew a circle as the signature on the entry-forms. The Yiddish word for "circle" is kikel (pronounced KY-kul), and for "little circle", kikeleh (pronounced KY-kul-uh). Before long the immigration inspectors were calling anyone who signed with an "O" in place of an "X" a kikel or kikeleh or kikee or, finally and succinctly, kike.
Philo of Alexandria never wrote about a "jizzus of Nazareth". Neither did 127 other historical authors that lived during that time period.
Fun fact: the "christian cross" is actually the Roman Tropaeum.>>100840
The Turin Shroud was created by Leonardo da Vinci you christcuck.
did you even read it, faggot?
You are using a "GOTCHA!" image created by an apolegetic orthodoxy catholic cuck attempting to explain away the terrible inconsistencies of the Turin Shroud, in which Leonardo da Vinci himself wrote, quote, "I have fooled the believers for the next five hundred years, they shall never suspect otherwise until logic prevails".>>100844
Being a christcuck of the highest order is>being this retarded
Anon. Hope you have your 12 shekels in hand to pay off the orthodoxy for all of your 6 million sins.
>>100842>Someone didn't write about it so it isn't true
A-anon I just can't understand that logic.>>100846
So, why'd you decide to leave r/atheism?
alright then, would you mind providing the proof to your statement to me since I gave you mine?
Someone is TRIGGERED.
For there are many unruly and vain talkers and deceivers, specially they of the circumcision:
Adolf should be granted sainthood.
"I will only mention the Apostle Paul. He, then, if anyone, ought to be calumniated; we should speak thus to him: ‘The proofs which you have used against the Jews and against other heretics bear a different meaning in their own contexts to that which they bear in your Epistles. We see passages taken captive by your pen and pressed into service to win you a victory, which in volumes from which they are taken have no controversial bearing at all … the line so often adopted by strong men in controversy – of justifying the means by the result." –St. Jerome, Epistle to Pammachus xlviii, 13; N&PNF. vi, 72-73
There were over 200 "gospels" written by the orthodox church fathers between 1800-1600 years ago. The Dead Sea Scrolls prove the syncreticism of judeo-christianity in that only a select number were canonized
to be the orthodox church truth, the same one reflected in the King James version
of your fairytale myth saga.>>100848
"We shall introduce into this history in general only those events which may be useful first to ourselves and afterwards to posterity." –Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History, Vol. 8, chapter 2.
"How it may be Lawful and Fitting to use Falsehood as a Medicine, and for the Benefit of those who Want to be Deceived." -Chapter 32, 12th Book of Evangelical Preparation
"Do you see the advantage of deceit? For great is the value of deceit, provided it be not introduced with a mischievous intention. In fact action of this kind ought not to be called deceit, but rather a kind of good management, cleverness and skill, capable of finding out ways where resources fail, and making up for the defects of the mind. And often it is necessary to deceive, and to do the greatest benefits by means of this device, whereas he who has gone by a straight course has done great mischief to the person whom he has not deceived." –Chrysostom, Treatise On The Priesthood Book 1
Lying was oh so easy for 200 years when the church fathers created your entire religion. Never heard of Horus? Mithra? The various sun gods of Egypt?>>100850
You are owned by the entire judaist synagogue cabal, yet you decry such ownership: globalism, judeo-communism, media ownership, the Federal Reserve. Your jizzus never existed, yet the fanciful tale serves to enslave christcucks to the Jew World Order, creating meek slaves of no value. The burden of proof has been accused. Where is your anger?
Why are yo so angry anon?
sadly the man worked no miracles, he was merely a devout follower of the Lord, a good Catholic as any proper man should be
I have no anger because I am saved through Christ. The Jews sought out Christians and slaughtered them. We worship the Son of the living God. (((They))) worship the world and its master now, Satan.
Deceit is not a motive I will ever tolerate. The entirety of judeo-christianity is a lie, as quoted by several more church fathers:
"Many things have been inserted by our ancestors in the speeches of our Lord which, though put forth under his name, agree not with his faith; especially since. As already it has been often proved these things were written not by Christ, nor by his apostles, but a long while after their assumption, by I know not what sort of half Jews, not even agreeing with themselves, who made up their tale out of reports and opinions merely, and yet, fathering the whole upon the names of the apostles of the Lord or on those who were supposed to follow the apostles, they maliciously pretended that they had written their lies and conceits according to them." -Faustus, Manichean bishop, orthodox
"We should always be disposed to believe that which appears to us to be white is really black, if the hierarchy of the church so decides." -Ignatius Loloya, founder and owner of the Society of the Jesuits.>>100860
Syncreticism of the Hellenized kikes and the half-noble inbreds of the Ahekenazi jewish charlatans whom wrote the talmud created your religion. What the fuck do you even believe?
The Bible. You should read it sometime.
which events did they introduce which falsehoods did they use, what deceit specifically are they referring to? these are just general statements that people intend to lie not what they lied about how or why, where specifically is your proof that Jesus was fictional? None of what you posted even seems to relate to him
freeing Germany from the jews was a miracle.
again these are non specific allegations of deceit in general. What point do you even think this actually proves?>>100864
when his spirit rises from the grave and the 4th Reich is established he will have accomplished a miracle after death, perhaps then he shall be canonized,
I feel like seen these post before so I’ll post the same response as before .
Authentic Christianity was very hostile to Jews and Judaism, not only because the Jews are destroyers of Christians since 2000 years, but also for purely religious reasons. In fact the Holy book of Christianity the Bible calls the Jews “Synagogue of Satan” in Revelation 3:9 and Revelation 2:9, also they were called by Jesus himself on earth “the sons of the devil” in John 8:44. The early founders of the Christian church were very aware of the danger of the Jews and their destruction of Christianity and the lives of Christians; they also accused the Jews of murdering the Christ by manipulating the Romans to do their dirty work. Jews were expelled at least 109 times form European cities, some reports say they were expelled 250 times. When Islam appeared and started its conquests, the Jews of Spain brought the Muslims, helped them to conquer Spain. That was called the “Golden Age” for both Muslims and the Jews because they lived in harmony together and enjoyed the fruits of European civilization. It was Queen Isabella of Spain who kicked them both out of Spain. Later on during the reign of Queen Maria Theresa it was their great expulsion from many European cities of the empire. Till WW2 the great leader of German Adolf Hitler also facilitated their expulsion and imprisoned the Communist Jews in labor camps were they were obliged to work… too much History to know but we can start by the Quotes.http://smoloko.com/?p=18371
We have more documentary evidence for christ than we do for alexander the great. 4 biographies written within his generation, and his name and cult referenced by roman historians
>About this time there lived Jesus, a wise man, if indeed one ought to call him a man. For he was one who performed surprising deeds and was a teacher of such people as accept the truth gladly. He won over many Jews and many of the Greeks. He was the Messiah. And when, upon the accusation of the principal men among us, Pilate had condemned him to a cross, those who had first come to love him did not cease. He appeared to them spending a third day restored to life, for the prophets of God had foretold these things and a thousand other marvels about him. And the tribe of the Christians, so called after him, has still to this day not disappeared.
-Josephus, Roman Historian, Jewish Antiquities, 18.3.3 §63
>Such indeed were the precautions of human wisdom. The next thing was to seek means of propitiating the gods, and recourse was had to the Sibylline books, by the direction of which prayers were offered to Vulcanus, Ceres, and Proserpina. Juno, too, was entreated by the matrons, first, in the Capitol, then on the nearest part of the coast, whence water was procured to sprinkle the fane and image of the goddess. And there were sacred banquets and nightly vigils celebrated by married women. But all human efforts, all the lavish gifts of the emperor, and the propitiations of the gods, did not banish the sinister belief that the conflagration was the result of an order. Consequently, to get rid of the report, Nero fastened the guilt and inflicted the most exquisite tortures on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judaea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome, where all things hideous and shameful from every part of the world find their centre and become popular. Accordingly, an arrest was first made of all who pleaded guilty; then, upon their information, an immense multitude was convicted, not so much of the crime of firing the city, as of hatred against mankind. Mockery of every sort was added to their deaths. Covered with the skins of beasts, they were torn by dogs and perished, or were nailed to crosses, or were doomed to the flames and burnt, to serve as a nightly illumination, when daylight had expired. Nero offered his gardens for the spectacle, and was exhibiting a show in the circus, while he mingled with the people in the dress of a charioteer or stood aloft on a car. Hence, even for criminals who deserved extreme and exemplary punishment, there arose a feeling of compassion; for it was not, as it seemed, for the public good, but to glut one man's cruelty, that they were being destroyed.
-Tacitus, The Annals (written ca. AD 116), book 15, chapter 44
I should read a book of events that never took place whom were based on the syncreticisms that blended judaic apocalyptic prophet speeches, Mithra worship, Horus worship, and fairy tales? I should read a book that condemns all rational, just men? I should read a book that quotes from "The Chronicle of Sulpicius Severus", written by Bitch-shop Martin of Tours? He was the piece of kike-loving shit that wrote of the persecutions of judeo-christians in Rome by Nero, an event that never happened. Prove otherwise.>>100863
Prove jizzus existed. Do not use apocryphal sources that refer only to themselves, to later authors, or to >>100865
The "Greek Letters" are forgeries. The entirety of "Corinthians" was forged by dumbfuck monks that didn't know the topography of the Roman Empire or Arabia. The whole of the bible is a hacked together manuscript for putting together a nice, neat, perfect little book that only the priests could know in order to dominate the world. You ever read the talmud, or kabbalah? No? Go do it. All judaic heritage religions are a canonized lie: nearly
perfected control mechanism to destroy free will, to destroy authority other than the "chosen ones", that is, the kikes themselves. In short, it's the perfect lie to fool gullible fence-sitters.>>100867
You are attempting to defend the white washing of judeo-christianity's caused Dark Ages. Good job, shabbest goyim. Is Pissrael truly your ally too, Ausfailia? Fact: the "second to ninth century martyrs" were clever Order of the Judaic-Jesuit Society fakes. The whole of Arabia was a non-factor until 1150 years ago until the orthodox catholic church decided it needed to conquer more lands, and thus acquire more riches for the jewish empire's forever unsatisfied reach. Revelations is an apocryphal sourcing of juadic armageddon zealots from 1900 to 1100 years ago, written and rewritten to suit the needs of the judeo-orthodoxy as situations, countries, and disaters declare. The Cuntqueen Isabella swore lineage through the Jesuits claiming that she was a quarter jewess, while Maria Theresa the whore kept her own court jews. You fall flat.>>100868>>100869>>100873
Apologism is a mental disease in the same mannners as globalism and judeo-communism. NO WRITERS before the 4th century, 1600 years ago, that deal with judeo-christianity are accurate. Josephus? HE WAS A FUCKING MESSIANIC ORTHODOX KIKE! He supposedly
wrote 127 words, the so-called Testimonium Flavianum, which dutifully confirms every single fucking "truth" of the christcuck myth: existence, more than human status, working miracles never before seen on this world or the "next", the teachings, a supposed ministry between kikes and GOYIM, being the perfect messiah, being condemned by kike royalty, being sentenced to death by someone known as Pilate that did not exist, a death on the cross which was a symbol of Tammuz, NOT judea, his followers being utterly devoted and unthinkingly adoring, a resurrected on the THIRD DAY, JUST LIKE HORUS AND MITHRA, appearing after the so-called crucifiction to everyone that knew him, and some other bullshit like being the herald of prophecies that were so divine and perfect only a few humans could know about them, otherwise they'd be blinded and turned into pillars of salt. It wasn't until 1600 years ago that the "Joesphus papers" were canonized by bitchshop Eusubius in "341 AD", who, might I add is the SINGLE biggest church liar-father of the orthodoxy! This fable of yours is so incredibly convoluted, apologetic, and fantastically mythic that it falls flat on every notion of historical accuracy!
The article wasn’t defending judeo-christianity but explaining what Christian originally was
Still triggered? I think Jesus said it best when He said that a house divided against itself cannot stand. How can the Bible be a Jewish lie if it condemns the Jews. It’s like if Hitler condemned himself and actions. The Jews would never expose their own corruption. They would never says that they are of their father the devil, as Jesus did.
>>100877>The "Greek Letters" are forgeries. The entirety of "Corinthians" was forge
you haven't proved any of this, you make specific claims but provide only general evidence that if anything it seems like you're taking out of context
You have no idea what the early judeo-christians believed. They varied from doom cults to slave cults to apocalypse cults to descendants of the Judeo-Stoics to who fucking cares. The gospels of "Papias", "Paul", "Clement", and "Barnabas", in reality Bar Nabbas, were nothing more than rewritings of the jewish doom prophets from 2100 to 1800 years ago that were used to rewrite the "Revelations" gospel in the 6th century. "Clement" was canonized and rewritten in the 5th century while the rest occurred from the second to fourth centuries, particularly during the apostolic wars of judeo-orthodoxy. Why are the so-called "divinely inspired gospels" so frustratingly incompetent when it comes to early judeo-christianity, particularly dates? Endless gaps of time, countries, and space occur. The whole of judeo-christianity has been definitively rewritten, over and over, by men founding a new semi-anti-judaic religion after the fall of Rome to differentiate themselves from the kikes, BUT somehow they kept the doctrines of blind obedience and refusing to question their peers? Judeo-christianity takes the ideas of RELICS and PROPHETS from the Egyptians, mixing them with the judaic texts of the talmud and the torah, then infuses them with HOLY, INFALLIBLE SUN GOD tales of Mithra, only renamed to avoid "pagan problems". Insanity is expecting the same result from a scenario multiple times.>>100882
Fuck off plebbit shill. Doublethink is doublethink: the empowerment of jews occurs on both sides of the aisle. The del-Binci, aka the Warburg family, motto was to profit off mass enslavements and genocides formed out of Spain for nearly 1,500 years. "I will sell swords to both armies, but only I may profit". Sitting on the fence like you are doing right now is the very model of christcuckery. Know what "turn your cheek" means? It's a clever phrase from the talmudic torah which directly translates to: "averting your eyes from the indignations caused by one's peers". So what if a few basic pedo rabbi are exposed? They aren't the orthodoxy, they aren't the truly holy ones
, they are disposable and should be treated as such. The moment a single individual refuses to make an objective analysis of the dogma they willfully and blindly believe in is the moment they fail, just as the previous two generations have.>>100895
Take your ShareBlue/CAP/Soros Foundation for the Preservation of Society shit elsewhere. A person of /mlpol/ would have done their research; you have proven you cannot do so.
But no one here’s judeo-christian
You may need to see someone about your anger issues. What do you mean if a few are exposed? The scribes and Pharisees were the founders of the Jewish traditions. In addition to warning all that read that the Jews are evil and the fact they burn Christian books such as the Bible mean it is anti-Jew. What your saying does not make any sense.
Turn the other cheek means don’t immediately get revenge by the way, doesn’t take a masters to figure that out.
And yes, we question our faith, doctrine, and dogma. That’s why I’m here in fact. I disagree with Catholics in the area of doctrine. We are not stupid.
Here is a question for you dear anon. Why are you still here fussing about Jesus if you think he doesn’t even exist? Maybe you have a problem with what he teaches? Does the whole dying for our sins thing got you down? Angry that there is a God going to judge us for sins? Just don’t want to admit it that your accountable for your actions in life?
If not, why are you wasting time here? To make a point that someone doesn’t exist so you get a little smile that you won an argument online? We have faith because we have questioned it and found it true. Your attempts to prove it false is all stuff we have seen before. Yell it out all day that we believe wrong. Jesus told us that there will be scoffers to our faith. But through all of your anger, Christ still died in your place that you may be saved. Consider this I pray.
When I first found /pol/, there was a "Daily reminder that Jesus loves you" thread. I expected mass tipping like in most of the internet, but instead there was genuine theological discussion. The best /pol/ truly is a Christian /pol/.
but I'm baptist
Welcome. Agnostic huh? That’s the one where you believe we can never know if there is a God or not right?
Well, if you wish to explain your ideology with us, I’m sure we would love to correct you.
Just pulling your leg. I would like to hear more about what you believe.
It's not that. I believe in God. Kinda. But the human brain is small. It is limited. "God" is a finite concept that we use in place of the infinite that we cannot know. I'm not on the so much of the opinion that one cannot prove God. But that he is beyond comprehension.
I do not truly believe in the bearded man. I cannot. It strikes me as absurd. Like the lie you tell a child who cannot yet understand the truth. I get the purpose, but even as a child myself, I cannot think it real.
God is. That is all I can say, and it is all that needs to be said. THAT is the alpha and the omega. To say that God is a dude with a son is to limit what he is so that you can comfortably wrap your mind around him. But you cannot wrap your mind around God. That is part of what makes God.
I personally am an atheist/Irrelevantist
I don't think there is a god, but even if there is one, I'm not going to live my life any differently
Christians do believe in an infinite God though. Jesus is just a large focus as He is simple to understand and what He did for us. We often think of God this was because of how personal of a God He is. He knows all of us and died in our place so we may know Him one day. When we die believing in His sacrifice for us, we will be able to understand.
God Himself mentioned He is infinite several times. He said I am that I am. He is the same yesterday as today as He will be tomorrow. A day with the Lord is as a thousand years and a thousand years as a day. He also makes mention that He is spirit, not human flesh.
Now that being said, He wants us to have at least a basic understanding of who He is and what He wants for us. That is where the Bible comes in. Making sense so far?
Don't wait for me. Do your thang, my man. I'm not going anywhere, I promise. I'll gripe if I feel the need.
So what is wrote down in the Bible is for us to have a relationship with a God beyond our comprehension and to come to knowledge of how much He cares for His creation. How many of us would care about a tiny finite creation we could just destroy and move on from? But God showed His love for us even when we rebel against Him. Christ died while people around mocked Him, spat spin Him, and tortured Him. Yet He offered them all the same gift.
But of course dying for someone is just part of what He did. It would be one thing to worship a dead man that claims to be a man of God, the Muslims do that with Muhammad. But Jesus proved He had power over the grave and rose from the dead, showing His power over it. He then charged Christians to spread the Word of God to let others know how they may be saved and have a relationship with the Creator.
And that’s the basics of it. The deeper you dig into the Bible you learn parts are debated about like with the baptists and Catholics over popes and saints, but the core is the belief in Jesus Christ mending our broken relationship with God, one we couldn’t repair ourselves.
Yeah, Jesus was not god, and it was never meant to be.
He was the tool of God to teach humans of things, that is why Jesus used to frequent the schools of mystery in Egypt.
Melchizedek is the closer we can get to God I believe, but we will never get to God, as God is everything and nothing.
It is also heresy to adore Jesus as God, you can read that in Romans, the humans created idols to adore instead of God.
Also Baphomet was created at some point in the middle of the crusades, the three faced king, so some of the Templars where also heretics.
If I'm making a mistake, please correct me, I do believe I admit my knowledge of this topic is quite short.
No? The entire bible was rewritten by robber-king James' court jews with the blessing of super rabbis across Europe. How does that work? Mixing and matching myths throughout the ages to best appeal to specific cultures somehow removes the judeo from the judeo-christian, right? Not a chance. Starting after the fall of Rome, the orthodox church fathers THEN began to condemn jews as they broke away from some parts of judaism, sure, that much is known. YET, after the rewrite the more insidious doctrines, dogmas, and stolen myths that looked helpful were kept. That fairy tale book is incredibly incoherent to begin with. There's this king of the jews who isn't a king of the jews, but says the chosen people are still jews, except some apocryphal source writes that jizzus says the jews weren't always evil, only to later state they're all evil. The fables can't keep a straight line for a SINGLE page. But wait! There's a quote in Genesis 37:25 that states there were CAMELS on their way to Egypt around 1700 BC. That's severely out of place since camels were not introduced until 7th century BC. Can't even keep the fucking story straight. It is impossible to cite a "biblical reference", or a non-canonized gospel reference, without running into the problem that there is ZERO historical credibility behind them. When the times change, the owners of the fairy tale book slap in a few extra lines here and there, create some new revisionisms, try to correct the record with apologetics, and make it seem as if somehow it's still relevant. Also, the Protection of Children Act in 1844. How's that working out for you?>>100915
Here's a list of all known perons with the first name of "Jesus" from the birth of Herod until 72 After Bullshit:
Jesus ben Ananias
Jesus ben Barabbas
Jesus ben Damneus
Jesus ben Gamala
Jesus ben Gamaliel
Jesus ben Pandira
Jesus ben Phiabi
Jesus ben Saphat
Jesus ben Sec
Jesus ben Sirach
Jesus ben Stada
Jesus ben Thebuth
All were real people. All were mentioned in census accounts or death records due to them committing crimes of jewish terrorism against Rome or Roman citizens. To go along with this, there was no city, village, or hamlet named "Nazareth" until the second century. The talmud mentions all 63 known towns of Galilee, yet there is no Nazareth, nor does "Paul" even write the name. It wasn't until the 4th century that Nazareth was concocted, yet the location has been changed over 30 times! Go ahead and look up the Itenarium Burdigalense, there's no Nazareth on it, nor is there a mention of such in the Tabula Peutingeriana. There is not a single solid source during a real specific time period that "Jesus of Nazareth" existed. These authors made not a single mention:
Aggrippa the First
Appian of Alexandria
Apollonius of Tyana
Clement of Alexandria
Gaius Asinius Pollo
Gaeus Calpurnius Piso
Herod of Chalis
Julius Alexander Tiberius, the Procurator of Judea
Justus of Tiberias
Marcus Annaeus Lucanus
Marcus Tullius Cicero
Philo Judaeus of Alexandria
Phlegon of Bithynia
Plutarch of Chaeronea
Pliny the Elder AND Younger
Ptolemy, known and mocked for being dead wrong on his geocentric epicycle nonsense
Seneca the Elder
Zarmarus of India
Every mention of "Jesus of Nazareth" supposedly written by these persons is a forgery concocted between the second to ninth centuries by the church fathers. As stated by Eusebius himself in Ecclesiastical History, volume 8 chapter 2: "We shall introduce into our new history in general only those events which may be useful first to ourselves and afterwards to posterity.">>100921
Fuck off christcuck. The only thing kikes deserve is the gas chamber and then their remains launched at some solar entity far the fuck away. The legions of meek, easily molded and influenced goyim like yourself which have crawled over the planet in the manner of a virus, plundering and killing all it can, are shockingly obtuse when it comes to self-diagnosis.>>100925
Cherry picked anti-jew periodisms using tepid, milquetoast "da joo is bad but you're still OUR slave, goy, so obey us or you're a witch/heretic/whatever" propaganda pieces do not constitute purging the world of those wretched aliens. Religion is the sole remaining superstitious cancer from the old world. Unfortunately it seems that logic, reason, rationale, and common sense are still considered "witchcraft" to most christcucks.
have you even read the bible anon?>>100945> "God" is a finite concept that we use in place of the infinite that we cannot know.
sure but he loves you, and you can still try to know him through faith and prayer.>that he is beyond comprehension
religion isn't about comprehending something per say, it's more rooting in belief and feelings> I cannot think it real.> To say that God is a dude with a son is to limit what he is so that you can comfortably wrap your mind around him.
have you even read the bible anon? or other religious texts for that matter, even though they're wrong you can still learn from them. These sound like assumptions you've made on your own which is find, but what could be the harm in reading and learning? No one is expecting you to simply accept what you're told outright, but if you study the scripture and pray you may find God yourself.>>100971
Jesus was God, but he was also himself. Both fully divine and fully a mortal man. Jesus is simply God incarnated on earth so that he could know us and tell us the truth.>If I'm making a mistake, please correct me, I do believe I admit my knowledge of this topic is quite short.
start by reading religious texts, I'd really recommend the Catholic Bible but you could still learn from others anything is better than reading nothing at all.>>100976>The entire bible was rewritten by robber-king James' court jews with the blessing of super rabbis across Europe.
I'm not going to disagree if you simply think the protestants are wrong but there are obviously other translations of the Bible besides the king james version, in the first place that doesn't even have all the books.>Here's a list of all known perons with the first name of "Jesus" from the birth of Herod until 72 After Bullshit
Again this isn't any real proof to say that Jesus himself doesn't exist this is just peculation based on limited information> As stated by Eusebius himself in Ecclesiastical History, volume 8 chapter 2: "We shall introduce into our new history in general only those events which may be useful first to ourselves and afterwards to posterity."
but still he does not day which events he is or isn't lying about, this isn't specific to Jesus, and beyond that "useful first to ourselves" doesn't even suggest the events were untrue. If anything this quote suggests they were leaving out bad information rather than making up good information>Fuck off christcuck. The only thing kikes deserve is the gas chamber
Both Hitler himself and the National Socialist Worker's Party of Germany was explicitly Christian, why they did allow non-christians Hitler would not have tolerated a blasphemous heathen like you in his ranks>are shockingly obtuse when it comes to self-diagnosis.>Cherry picked
projecting>periodisms using tepid, milquetoast "da joo is bad but you're still OUR slave, goy, so obey us or you're a witch/heretic/whatever"
all you've really proven ITT is that you've never read the Bible, certainly not your point tho I'd ask if you were honestly trying to prove that with this pathetic shilling
>>101005>Jesus was God, but he was also himself. Both fully divine and fully a mortal man.
Jesus was a medium then, that makes sense when people claim "Jesus is a state of mind"
Mediums have special qualities that let them take in spirits to use their bodies.
Still, it's kind of weird yo think about it, for what I have reader God is an omnipotent presence that is inside of everything, there's also people that just say God is love.
So, God is like an essence, since information can be stored on mid air, for our perception, God is an invisible something that's everywhere and covers everything, like air.
Thing is, this something has a will and actively tries to help us or do what he wants us to do, for when he really needs to send us a message, he takes possession of someone, like Jesus.
Sorry I don't want to appear doubtful, heretics or hostile, I just find these topics really amusing.
I have actually read a few translations from Romans and some random versicles from the Bible.
I also have some knowledge on some other stuff but I leave that as non canon unless I have to make an argument.
>>101008>Jesus was a medium then
no, the word "avatar" is probably the closest if you want to define it in terms. Jesus was God himself, he was God made flesh both a mortal man and a divine being. You're missing the meaning in the virgin birth and what the angel Gabriele explained to Mary.>Sorry I don't want to appear doubtful, heretics or hostile, I just find these topics really amusing.
rather than me, I'd prefer you go to confession and make these sorts of apologies to God himself, heresy can be forgiven but it isn't in my power to do so.>I have actually read a few translations from Romans and some random versicles from the Bible.
it's no surprise that many of you here think that you can not really grasp God through reason or factually know the truth beyond any doubt. Rather of course you can't if you knew for sure you wouldn't need to have faith in him. Jesus Christ doesn't call us to simply know and accept the facts because much of this cannot be proven or disproven from our perspective, you have to place your trust in him.
>>101008>Jesus was God, but he was also himself. Both fully divine and fully a mortal man.>Jesus was a medium then
Not necessarily. There are other interpretations still valid, even accepting those statments as true. If there was a being outside of a particular timeframe, how would you think of his interactions inside of the timeframe? Lets say that you have a video game and a human. The human is not in the video game, yet he has a character with an avatar. Is that avatar the same thing as the human? Similarly, is the human body known as Jesus the same thing as god? Would it be fair to call Jesus a puppet, or just a persona, or some kind of meat golem?
Under this interpretation, Jesus would be god while also having almost nothing to do with god. Things which exist outside of our understanding necessarily defy our definitions.
Jesus is God because God Himself promised a Messiah that would save fallen man. Through the Scriptures we find that Jesus fits this description perfectly. If the Bible doesn’t convince you through fulfilled prophecy or the miracles Jesus did that He is the Son of God and is God through the Trinity, I won’t be much help.>>100976
If your getting your information from the Talmud, your getting a sick view of Christianity to begin with. Of course the Jews would never write about the town the Saivor of the world came from, they refuse to write the letter x because they think it is like the Christian symbol.
And again I will ask you, if He is fake, why waste your time with us? If we do end up believing wrong, why does it matter to you? What do you gain from this? Christianity has existed for about 2,000 years and has had tougher opposition than you anon. We will still be here.
That being said, Jesus welcomes you anytime you wish to turn from your blasphemy. He knows you and all you struggle with. He cared for you so much that He took your punishment for you. When you believe in Jesus Christ’s death, burial, and resurrection and confess this with your mouth, you will be saved. Sin will no longer bind you to hell and you can finally have peace of heart.
>>101010>'d prefer you go to confession and make these sorts of apologies to God himself,
The lords house is the whole of the world, heritic
Oh yes, brushing off that many historical authors as "b-but limited information, you're WRONG because you're hurting my feelings about what I BLINDLY OBEY AND BELIEVE! waaaaah!" Continue gorging yourself on talmud & torah shit harder, I'm sure it'll make you feel better in the next life.
#2: the entire fairy tale book is a mishmash of stolen origins, mythos, and legendry, primarily Buddhist and Egyptian. Here's a fun story for you: Gautama the holy man. He's wrongly convicted of murdering a courtesan, Bhadra, and is impaled on a cross. His mentor visis him and they speak, but not before spawning two Gautama dies at "a place of skulls", yet manages to sire two children, the founders of what would become the Ikshavaku Dynasty. Here's another one: Buddha crosses the Ganges but not before foretelling his death, then goes to Kusinagari for a last meal, then foretells his coming death two more times Buddha arrives at Kukuttha, sounds real similar to Golgotha, right? Budda refuses a drink twice. Buddha then dies between two trees. Buddha promises his last convert: "today you will find paradise". Buddha's death occurs during great darkness. Kasyapas, sounds an AWFUL lot like Kleopas doesn't it? Was one of Buddha's earlier disciples, and had been traveling with 500 monks when he encounters a man he does not know whom tells him of Buddha's death, though one of the disciples lambasts Buddha for dying. Buddha's body is burned, and while that happens his soul is seen traveling upwards through the smoke, which was considered his resurrection. Both of these originated from 2,200 years ago in the Samghabhedavastu, which was a bit of legendry out of India and contributed to the Buddhist mythos. Can't make up your own bullshit, steal it from someone else.
#3: sheep cannot guard themselves when they are willfully blind, deaf, dumb, and stupid.
#4: weak counter-argument. Your fallacy here occurs via projecting your own emotionally harmed state.
#5: reading a zealotry filled fairy tale book rife with judaic insanity, hypocrisy, fabrications that entirely lack historical facts, and quite frankly a disturbing number of absolutely vile, hateful followers of it, is a waste of life as a whole. One cannot build a house without a foundation, which makes judeo-christianity an extraordinarily unstable building carefully set on sand, awaiting a collapse in on itself. By the way, all of your "saints" are stolen, rebranded, and repurposed identities. Take "George" the pork salesman! He was an oppressor, murderer, scoundrel, rapist, and fraud whom filled his own coffers and encouraged bishops to reign free while the common man was enslaved to serve mother church, usually until death. Good luck white washing that one.>>101012
"Christianity is the most ridiculous, the most absurd, and bloody religion that has ever infected the world … the true God cannot have been born of a girl, nor died on a gibbet, nor be eaten in a piece of dough."
You know nothing of "struggle". You are the naive outgrowth of a murder-cult spawned disease. That alone is the highest heresy to the world.
Jesus was not a puppet. He was born of a virgin and lived among us as the scriptures tell us. The Bible makes it clear in John 1:14
And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us…
The Bible, a revelation of God’s truth to us, tell us He was physically born and not controlled. He became limited to suffer as we do yet without sin, and to be the spotless sacrifice to free us from sin and hell.
Christianity is the most bloody by means of people killing Christians for sport. We know little of your personal struggles anon, be God does. He knew you before time began and has been reaching out to you. You know that this is true on your heart. It isn’t our place to save you, only a humble heart willing to surrender to the will of God can ask for forgiveness.
If you continue on this path, you will find earthly pleasures, but your soul will remain empty of what it desires. Remember that this world is very temporary for you as you will one day die. Do you know what will happen to you and all your life’s work then?
Excellent evidence of the usefulness of the existence of the church on the whole, and perhaps evidence of the goodness of convincing someone to use official jesusTM confessionals, but utterly not evidence of the insufficiency of the meager efforts of those such as yourself to mend, mold, and love your fellows as an open ear and open heart, and absolutely not evidence that "god himself" isn't listening unless you go to the special wooden box.>>101018
To be "the word made flesh" does not indicate that he is not a puppet built to represent higher power, and I also gave more interpretations then just the puppet one.
>>101017>Oh yes, brushing off that many historical authors as "b-but limited information
this is just projecting you're brushing off Josephus and Tacitus, as well as the bible itself on merely a lack of corroborating information>Continue gorging yourself on talmud & torah
the Talmud was compiled in 500 AD after the bible you retard.>#2: the entire fairy tale book is a mishmash of stolen origins, mythos, and legendry, primarily Buddhist and Egyptian.
not that you cite anything, but how do you know they didn't steal from the Bible and not the other way around? besides which these are merely coincidences.>#3: sheep cannot guard themselves when they are willfully blind, deaf, dumb, and stupid.>#4: weak counter-argument. Your fallacy here occurs via projecting your own emotionally harmed state.
more projecting.>#5: reading a…
so you haven't even read it then? Opinion discarded>>101019>i heard girls from catholic schools are total sluts
I went to catholic school and can confirm this as true, they don't pray enough and don't understand the role God has for them>>101021>that "god himself" isn't listening unless you go to the special wooden box.
this was already discussed earlier in this thread, but Jesus Christ literally founded the Roman Catholic Church himself and named Peter the first pope.
read Matthew 16:13-20, Mark 8:27–30 and Luke 9:18–20 for the Confession of Peter
Matthew 28:16-20 for The Great Commission
and Acts 2:1-31 for when The Holy Spirit Comes at Pentecost>To be "the word made flesh" does not indicate that he is not a puppet built to represent higher power, and I also gave more interpretations then just the puppet one.
again what you're lacking is an understanding of the virgin birth and the significance of it.
To imply Jesus wasn’t God come down as man is to say Jesus didn’t really suffer on the cross. If He was some puppet or other means of being among us than physically being there, then the sacrifice means nothing. He could do it all day long and feel nothing. But instead the Bible says Jesus sweated blood, real mortal dread of the suffering and torture He would endure for us.
Jesus came to earth and died in our place, to say it was by any other means is to say it really wasn’t a sacrifice.
How would it not be physical? How would it not be suffering? The body was a body and the blood was blood, was it not. Are you saying that at the time in which Jesus was on earth, there was no heavenly figure looking down on us and feeling what Jesus felt? Are you claiming that the whole of him was exclusively at work in that body? If not, then a division of some kind exists.
I think that you are thinking that I'm saying the division was a lot more cut-and-dry than what I intend to imply.
The other part your thinking of is God the Father. Yes, He watched Jesus, if faceted they spoke to each other.
These words spake Jesus, and lifted up His eyes to heaven, and said, Father, the hour is come; glorify thy Son, that thy Don also may glorify thee:
You misunderstand though, Jesus is separate from God and yet is the same. A level of complexity we mortals don’t understand. This is proven in John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
No, again, you don't know jack shit. You define the phrase "useful idiot" so well the global elite absolutely LOVES people like you. You're doing all their manipulative work, to yourself, for free no less, with great aplomb. If any gods ever existed, they're looking at humanity far away and laughing at the wretched, self-hating, self-enslaved masses alongside yourself.
There is nothing beyond.>>101022
Revisions and rewrites abound in the fairy tale book. Oh wait, that's fairy tale BOOKS. In fact, there are over 480 confirmed rewrites!
#1: Josephus and Tacitus were founding church fathers; both have been endlessly
proven to be frauds, liars, and mythos thieves. Apocryphal reintegration of judaic mythos and legendry to appease ruffled court jews and kike royalty of the time are well known.
#2: there is no such event as a coincidence, you massive hypocrite. The many thousands
of writers working on the hundreds of gospels stole whatever they could use to further their insane agendas. Go ahead, ask someone you trust to research those two stories written well before your bible. Or don't, continue showing off your zealous ignorance.
#3 & 4: your own fault for failing to understand such violent subject matter.
#5: "b-but my opinion is better than yours! I'm emotionally harmed by your mean words!" Keep it up, maybe one day you'll believe the batshit insanity ideology just enough.
Here's another fable: Anicetus, a pope, dreams up the "Peter, first bishop of Rome" bullshit to win an argument against Polycarp of Smyrna during the 2nd century. Supposedly he was ordered beheaded by Nero at some vague point in time, yet there is no mention in Nero's own records of a "Peter" being executed, nor in any Roman records which remained whole until an attempted burning by the cathocuck orthodoxy. The name "Peter" is a bastardized pig-latin name which does not exist before the time, thus it doesn't merit notice. Two centuries later, "Paul" was also apocryphally added to Nero's execution list, as was "Mark", but he's also mentioned to have been dragged to death. Maybe. Or maybe not, because the fairy tale book writers couldn't keep their shit straight.
Oh, and another fun one: Judas Iscariot never existed. Yet another
second century creation by Papias in 130 After Bullshit, one of the founding, forever lying church fathers. In First Samuel 31:4, Second Samuel 1:2-10, Second Samuel 21:12, and First Chronicles 10:13-14 give "Judas Iscariot" FOUR DIFFERENT DEATHS! Wow! He must be really hated to get that special treatment! The word "Iscariot" is a horrific pig-latin bastardization of Sicarii, whom were jewish assassins armed with a sickle blade called the sicae. But you didn't know that.
Oh no wait, those four mentions were for "King Saul", yet another completely undiscovered character whom never existed. Funny how that all works out.
>>101025>literally questioning God himself
you think that God who is all powerful cannot both be Jesus and in Heaven at the same time?
I literally argued the opposite of that, and questioned the poster I was responding to.
how retarded are you? just because something was rewritten that doesn't mean it is untrue
you make a whole heap of other claims while citing nothing, it's like you don't understand basic logic or proof
>>101030>Jesus was on earth, there was no heavenly figure looking down on us and feeling what Jesus felt? Are you claiming that the whole of him was exclusively at work in that body? If not, then a division of some kind exists.
yes but in doing so you question what God is capable of
Well, it’s time to do some hard Bible schooling on this unrepentant loser.
1 John 4:1-6
Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world. Hereby know he the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God: And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of Antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world. Ye are of God, Little children, and have overcome them: because greater is He that is in you, than he that is in the world. They are of the world: therefore speak they of the world, and the world heareth them. We are of God: he that knoweth God heareth us; he that is not of God heareth not us. Hereby know we the spirit of truth, and the spirit of error.
We can rationalize with you all day, but to no avail. God is to be worshipped in spirit and in truth. We are saved through faith. These things can never be proven through the world’s knowledge. So take it or leave it, but know that your choice has consequences.
I question what the other poster is "claiming" that god is capable of.>Are you saying that at the time in which Jesus was on earth,
this little bit right here that you didn't quote was kind of important.
>To imply Jesus wasn’t God come down as man is to say Jesus didn’t really suffer on the cross. >If Jesus =/= God come down, Jesus didn’t suffer.
This statement here is the one I am taking issue with, wherein the poster places a limitation on god that any suffering endured by any human-shaped-construct which god made could not also be suffered by god.
Further, he implies that my statement that Jesus was created by god in any way implies that God could not also "be" Jesus.
Can you shill for christcuckery any softer please, you're making the global elites happy with blind obedience. Rewriting a bad fable to correct itself is apologism, anon. The apologetics today backpedal ever more fiercly in on themselves due to the fairy tale book, and all of it's non-canonized gospels, utterly lacking any historical accuracy.>>101033
That entire passage has no logic, reason, or rationale behind it. It is a vacuous assertion of "everything IS THIS WAY because this statement in this crazy ass book SAYS IT IS". You are hiding behind batshit insane "doctrine" disguised as some sort of super-ultra-secret-truth in an offended manner. Your beliefs attempt to convey some sort of "secret truths" that are somehow absolutely unknowable yet perfectly evident to the blind, dumb, devoted believer, except there's this magical sun-god-child and a rampantly murderous deity whom demands the world to be conquered that know everything on top of that. Religious predestination, like coincidences, do not exist. By the way, that entire paragraph is ripped off from one of Buddha's own tales which was written 2,300 years ago. Go ahead, disprove that like the rest. Oh wait, you won't even bother because it's safer to be ignorant and thus never contemplate the thought that you could ever be wrong. Bad end, sempai.
Seem like someone can’t take a little Bible reading. Aww…
How about another verse of the “secret truth” that anyone can pick up and read? Don’t like that idea? Well, find another board, you should have known what you would be getting into.
2 Peter 3:3-4
Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lists, And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation.
And for all of the stories that are like the Bible, it is almost like everyone was a descendant of someone that told them all the same story of God and a coming Savior. Isn’t that strange? Then how do we get other faiths with multiple gods or none at all? People like you who can’t accept it.
So no, it doesn’t surprise me that there are hundreds of false Jesuses out there. Keep trying though, I’m sure you will stump us and make us so foolish that we renounce our faith in Christ… I’m so sure.
Also, that passage just explained why you don’t understand it. It’s right there, how can you miss it? You are of the world and you refuse to hear us and the Word of God. Thereby you are of the spirit of error. You can’t even begin to understand the Bible because you have already determined it is false in your heart.
you're the one shilling fir the global elites, they like you hate Jesus
There is considerably more true in that passage than you are giving it credit for, even if the bible was just a book. U mad mate, and rather strictly closed, or at least you are exaggerating a little.
I would enjoy that.
By my understanding you can’t follow Judaism
And Christianity because one simply believes Jesus is the messiah and other don’t, this was everything I could find on Judao-Christian and why it’s stupid shit
The One-Hundred Year-Old Duping of American Evangelical Christianity – Christian Zionismhttps://ajmacdonaldjr.wordpress.com/2011/10/04/the-100-year-old-duping-of-american-evangelical-christianity-christian-zionism/
The Scofield Bible a Zionist Forgery with Oxford Origins That Has Created Millions of Warlike, Judeo-Christian Zionist Useful Idiotshttp://www.judeofascism.com/2011/06/scofield-bible-zionist-forgery-with.html
The Scofield Bible, Oxford Publishing and the House of Rothschildhttp://www.whale.to/a/scofield_bible1.html
The Shocking Truth About C.I. Scofieldhttp://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Wolves/scofield.htm
Zionism's Un-Christian Biblehttp://dissidentvoice.org/2009/11/zionisms-un-christian-bible/
The Zionist-Created Scofield 'Bible'http://rense.com/general60/zcre.htm
The Myth of a Judeo-Christian Traditionhttp://www.biblebelievers.org.au/judeochr.htm
Comparison of Christianity and Judaismhttp://www.religionfacts.com/christianity/charts/christianity_judaism.htm
Judiasm and Christianity: The Differenceshttp://www.convert.org/Judaism_and_Christianity.html
The heresy of Judeo-Christianity.http://smoloko.com/?p=14192
The Jewish Messiah and Why Jesus Does Not Qualifyhttp://www.jewsforjudaism.ca/resources-info/the-jewish-messiah
Is Christianity a Form of Judaism?http://www.jewishanswers.org/ask-the-rabbi-category/from-idolatry-to-conversion/?p=3968>…modern Christianity is a contradiction to Judaism.
Why Jews Don't Believe in Jesushttp://www.simpletoremember.com/articles/a/jewsandjesus/
Why Jews Don't Believe in Jesushttp://www.aish.com/jw/s/48892792.html
this pretty much, the Bible and Jesus himself are both opposed to Jews who in turn hate Jesus and Christianity, the global jewish elite outright hate christians. This is all well documented the idea that Christianity somehow is or serves Judaism is absurd, the actual useful idiot who's falling for globalist mind control is b9470 >>101027
who's been brainwashed by zionist anti-christian propaganda.
it's never too late to start anon, Jesus loves you. You can pick up a bible recognized by the Catholic Church, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Bible
, at any bookstore or on amazon
Sorry Anon, I just don't really care about that much, I recognize importance of religion for people and country and I support it but I just don't see anything in it myself.
I'm not atheist mind you, I'm not saying that there is no God, I just don't have any specifical stance on that issue.
This is off topic, but I have been wondering about a prophecy that I struggle understanding and I’m wondering if anyone can help me out with it.
I have been reading through Revelation and I have come across something. I am probably just slow at catching on, but in Revelation 13:2 the Scripture mentions
And the beast which I saw was like into a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority.
I am just now catching on, but this sounds just like Daniel 7 in which Daniel dreams of 4 beasts one being like a lion, one a bear, one a leopard, and the last is the same beast as described in Revelation. It is clarified later in the chapter that these beasts are kings that rise up. Does this mean that the antichrist is from a merger of the kingdoms or a descendant of these kings?
Revelation, although very confusing to me, is one of my favorite books of the Bible to read. If anyone can help me understand it better, I would be most thankful.
I dislike catholicism and its derivatives for its blatant disrespect for the natural world and in that it simultaneously puts Man on a pedestal and spends an entire lengthy book taking a giant turd on him. Also the whole lose-your-freedom-and-free-will when you go to heaven thing. I'm a heathen paganist and there's nothing you can do about it.
Nothing we can do but guide you to the Bible. You and God do the changing of your mind and heart.
We typically stay away from sacrifices. We only needed the one. Jesus Christ took our place so we never need to make blood payment for transgressions.
That and our prayers are a bit more effective. Just saying.
isn't that just because you haven't actually read the bible let alone any other holy book? I could tell you the story of Siddhārtha Gautama's whole life and explain the beliefs of shinto, taoism, and several sects of paganism even though I don't believe in them. I'm not trying to insult you and I can't tell you how to live your life, but you do realize you're simply being willingly ignorant?>>101104
it's not off topic at all, good question.
Revelation 13:2> 2 And the beast which I saw was like a leopard, and his feet were like those of a bear, and his mouth like the mouth of a lion. And the dragon gave him his power and his throne and great authority.
>Daniel 7:6> 6 After this, as I watched, another appeared, like a leopard. The beast had four wings of a bird on its back and four heads; and dominion was given to it.
just from the scripture outside of it "being like a leopard" the beasts seem pretty different to me, but I'll look into if they're related and get back to you.>>101105
this is a misunderstanding anon, I'm not exactly sure where you're coming from without further clarification many Catholics view humanity as being called on to care for God's creation which includes the natural world.
to the extent that they have souls and are made in the image of God I can see how it could be seen it "puts Man on a pedestal" but it still calls on people to humble themselves before Almighty God and Jesus Christ our lord and savior. It's true that the Bible is at many points very critical of humanity and human behavior but I don't see how it's incorrect in doing so, so I'll leave the latter alone.>the whole lose-your-freedom-and-free-will when you go to heaven thing
this is an odd way to look at it, originally at creation adam and eve didn't have free will, they gained it from the tree of knowledge but this cost us humanities place in the garden of eden.>I'm a heathen paganist and there's nothing you can do about it.
of course not, only you can change that. Humans now that they have free will can choose to doubt or rebel against the Lord but that's the point; he calls on us to have faith and trust in him. While originally more overprotective of humanity God is now willing to let us make mistakes despite his love for us. Think of it this way, your father probably loves you I assume but if you disobey him too much he may disown you, it's not because he hates you that he might do this.>>101109
Christians aren't going to hell
to clarify a bit further
>Revelation 13:1>The First Beast> 13 And I saw a beast rising out of the sea, with ten horns and seven heads, with ten diadems on its horns and blasphemous names on its heads.
>Daniel 7:23-24>23 "Thus he said: 'As for the fourth beast, there shall be a fourth kingdom on earth, which shall be different from all the kingdoms, and it shall devour the whole earth, and trample it down, and break it to pieces. 24 As for the ten horns, out of this kingdom ten kings shall arise, and another shall arise after them;he shall be different from the former ones, and shall put down three kings.
so the beast in daniel has 4 heads which if I understand correct represent 4 kingdoms, compared to this the beast in revelations has 7 heads which might be related to the 10 kings as the "another" that rises after them puts down three so in daniel we are left with 7 kings possibly for 7 kingdoms, but I'm not sure.
well how can we talk about Catholicism if you haven't even read the bible silly?
I just generally don't believe in things. I have hopes and dreams but I don't really believe in them or anything else.
If I can't rationalize something and get some conclusion I just don't put a lot of thoughts into it.
I don't really see holy books as holy, they are products of humans and history, even if they were something more at some point they aren't what they were anymore.
There were many different religions, each of them was based on something, some of those old beliefs of course can be easily disproven using modern science, but how can we really just took one of those many, often contradicting religions and say that it's true?
We just need to believe in it, it isn't logical. It's just faith.
Maybe it means that I'm ignorant, but I don't really care about this particular issue enough to change it.
>>101128>I just generally don't believe in things>I don't really see holy books as holy>but I don't really care about this particular issue enough to change it.
like I keep saying anon that's because you haven't read the Bible.
>We just need to believe in it, it isn't logical. It's just faith.
what's wrong with that? in the first place isn't logic and reality at some point based on faith? the world you see is a world you see only through your own eyes, how can you know you're not simply deceiving yourself? you have faith in your mind, and in your perceptions, as well as in reality. So how is faith in God such an issue?
Faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.
Please continue to explain how modern science disproves a creator. Even some evolutionists are now saying the world could have been made, but they lie and say it must be aliens that made us. Modern science has made a habit of making a religious claim itself, a claim that the world was made by itself through an accident. Have you observed this or proved such an event not only is likely, but did happen? So far they only have faith to present. Faith the world was formed by chance.
I read fragments of bible, I had religion in school, I visited church for a big part of my life.
And I feel nothing special in it, for me those are just empty words.
And while I like reading, religion isn't something that I'm particullary interested in, there are dozens of different subjects that I, and everyone else is ignorant because it's impossible to have knowledge in everything, there is too much of it.
And religion isn't something that's high on my list of priorities.>>101139
I never said that science disproves existence of God, I only mentioned that it disproves many of ancient beliefs like Gods being responsible for storms and things like that.
I simply don't have faith in anything specificall, be it lack of God or his existence.
But God can control the storms. If not, He isn’t much of an all powerful God is He? But He did make the world with systems and patterns, an order so we can better survive. How could we function if the weather constantly was shifted around? God set this up as He promised when He said the seasons would continue until the earth reaches its end.
>>101144>I read fragments of bible
right, so you haven't read the whole thing and you go on to explain that you don't really understand something that you have limited knowledge of.>it disproves many of ancient beliefs like Gods being responsible for storms and things like that.
how so? even if we know the specifics of how they happen there's still elements of chance and such in the specifics of where or when
It's your belief. Nothing more, nothing less.
Maybe it's true, maybe not, I can't prove any of those options, so I don't care about it.
Well, glad your not the guy that would discover things like bacteria. People once upon a time thought those were not a thing and is just a crazy belief that a microorganism could get you sick. If you couldn’t prove it right away, we may have been set back in science.
But hey, if you change your mind, we are here to show you about the truth of the Bible.
>>101104http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/01594b.htm>The divine drama>First act (chapters 12-14)>The beast from the sea is in great part taken from Daniel's description of the four beasts. It arises from the sea (Daniel 7:3); has seven heads marked all over with blasphemies. It had also ten horns, like the fourth beast of Daniel (7:7); it resembled a leopard, the third beast of Daniel (7:6), it had feet like a bear, the second beast of Daniel (7:5); and teeth like a lion, the first beast of Daniel (7:4). The great dragon gives full power unto the beast, whereupon all the world worship it (viz. those whose names are not contained in the book of the lamb). The followers of the beast have its mark on their head and hand. The beast from the land has two horns like a ram. Its power lies in its art of deceiving by means of tokens and miracles. Throughout the remainder of the book it is called the false prophet. Its office is to assist the beast from the sea, and to induce men to adore its image. The first act of the drama concludes with a promise of victory over the beast by the lamb of God. >"From this cursory perusal of the book, it is evident that the Seer was influenced by the prophecies of Daniel more than by any other book. Daniel was written with the object of comforting the Jews under the cruel persecution of Antiochus Epiphanes. The Seer in the Apocalypse had a similar purpose. The Christians were fiercely persecuted in the reign of Domitian. The danger of apostasy was great. False prophets went about, trying to seduce the people to conform to the heathen practices and to take part in the Caesar-worship. The Seer urges his Christians to remain true to their faith and to bear their troubles with fortitude. He encourages them with the promise of an ample and speedy reward. He assures them that Christ's triumphant coming is at hand. "
hope that helps.>>101151
you possessing free will have the right to refuse God and salvation through Jesus Christ, but you will go to hell. You and only can prevent this.
Meh, I just came here for some light talking, not to change my life.
Jesus loves you anyway anon.
We don’t mind a little light banter. We of course would love to see you change your mind, but a discussion is a good step without making you uncomfortable I suppose.
Absolute fucking bullshit. You can't even write down the historical context for Constantine, that whore-mongering murderer and usurper rewriting the "Peter" gospels in the 3rd century which then directly conflict with the "Paul" gospels in the 4th century, modified several times before canonization by Franciscan monks. These are proven facts. Find me ANY historical quotations OUTSIDE of christcuck church fathers or apologists that confirm ANY part of the fairy tale book. Fact: there aren't any. Not a single writer from Asia, N.America, S.America, Africa, N.Europe, or Eastern Arabia has ever written a single fucking thing proving your dogshit insane religion's so-called "worldwide miracles".>>101043
Disprove any historical references which have been stated or quoted. Not a single person in this thread has even tried to. They have not even attempted to cite a SINGLE historical fact, and instead REEEEE aloud, making outbursts of emotional, illogical nonsense at any notion that they have been deluded. THIS is why the global elite are laughing their fucking heads off at these people: they can't even make a single objective attempt to dig themselves out of the holes they've been forced into.>>101096
You are clearly retarded. Have you even read a single line of what I've posted? ALL. JEWS. MUST. DIE. All dogma and doctrines related to the abraHAMic faiths must be expunged from this world if humanity is ever to prosper. How often must that be repeated? Instead, you're tl;dr'ing and going "loltrolledhesomad" to yourself like a good globalist cock sucking goyim.
Definitely feel like this is a repeat of a argument I have had
In 1933, prior to the annexation of Austria into Germany, the population of Germany was approximately 67% Protestant and 33% Catholic; while the Jewish population was less than 1%. A census in May 1939, six years into the Nazi era and after the annexation of mostly Catholic Austria into Germany, indicates that 54% considered themselves Protestant, 40% Catholic, 3.5% self-identified as "gottgläubig" (lit. "believers in God", often described as predominately creationist and deistic), and 1.5% as non-religious.
Truth be told I don’t think nazism minded if people are Christian or even Muslim or Jewish as along as they had same ideals to keep Germany pure, And also think you’re using divide & conquer tactics shareblue
Coming from a crown-cuck loving goy, sure. Get a mod to look at my fucking post history. I hate ALL forms of judaism. It's successors are no less twisted, vile, and batshit insane. All jews must die, period. After that, all traces of abrahamic religions must be removed; they are the final remaining vestiges of cruel, Dark Age superstitious insanity.
First image, look at the countries listed. They were truly cucked, yet the moment they realized "wait, something's wrong here", after decades or centuries of obliviousness to the damage occurring within their own borders, the kikes were removed, NOT purged. That was their fatal flaw, and is still the fatal flaw of humanity.
Your still here? Look anon, we have given you plenty of quotes from both outside and inside the Bible and your still not happy. There is only so much we can do for you. We have brought up quotes from historians to quotes from Hitler and more. Then we have shown you what the Bible says. Either you don’t remember or you just want to keep ignoring these proofs. You constantly ignore a rational debate and bring pure emotion to the argument. Funny how you are telling others not to reee when you yourself are.
And one last thing… and I will put it in this nice open space and maybe I will get an answer instead of your constant bombardment of accusations of being allied with Jews.
What do we replace Christianity with?
Did you read that? Will you answer? Because last I checked, the Jews are pushing Christianity out the door to begin with. Why do leftists teach evolution and there is no God? It’s almost like that’s what they wish us to believe and not in God. Why would the “Jewish religion” of Christianity be removed by the very ones taking over? Why go through the trouble if it is your ally?
You are deceived into believing your enlightened by not believing in God and have promoted reasoning and maybe even yourself to the level of God, just what they want. A godless society has no morals, argue this all you want. Every time a moral pillar is removed, the top thinkers won’t establish morals base on science or good standards.
Need proof? Look at the Enlightenment period.
>>101256>Disprove any historical references which have been stated or quoted
none of the ones you cited actually proved anything specific in regard to the claims you made so there's no need to, you made no rel attempt to prove any actual point so there's no call to disprove anything.>They have not even attempted to cite a SINGLE historical fact
I did >>100873
you just screeched autistically about it and tried to poison the well by complaining about the person quoted without disproving what he wrote.
the Nazi's were Chirtian as was Hitler himself, both the Bible and Jesus himself denounced jews outright as kin to the devil. The only other people who hate Christians as much as you claim to yourself are the globalist jews, it's very clear what side you're on. You're either a (((shill))) or have been brainwashed by shilling
I think Paulo Coelho said it best
Don’t waste your time with explanations: people only hear what they want to hear.
Your worthless and pointless to debate
Hitler made numerous mentions of his contention with catholicism, both of the orthodoxy and non-orthodoxy sects, over their archaic relations to judaism, the plundered mythos they used to obtain dominance, and their bloody warmongering descent from a murder-cult founded by jews in Rome. Funny how you gloss over those.>>101269
The bible was written and rewritten by over 600 authors. Your own christian scholars have confirmed that time and again in the past 150 years. I have brought historical proof here only to be figuratively spit on by a closed minded cuck whom does not even recognize his own self-slavery to whitewashed judaic traditions. You claim
to be logical, reasonable, and rational, yet you continue throwing bigoted, un-aimed arguments concerning how "objectively wrong" I am instead of researching your own cult when it cannot do anything more than waffle and throw more apologists at it's problems. Go fucking figure that one.
I don't care what your murderous superstition is replaced with so long as it isn't abrahamic and thus kike-descended. Morality is not the sole property of religion, nor does religion own the "soul", if it exists, of a human being. Do not figuratively put words in my mouth.
The Enlightenment was the result of mother church being dragged kicking and screaming "science is sorcery!" for over 1,600 years until it realized that it could not change technological progress. Most of the Enlightenment's successes were generated from knowledge kept safe in the Arabic and Asian lands from christian book burners. Library of Alexandria? Library of Philo? The Hellenic Libraries? The Library of Nursia? The Library of Apollonius? The Any of those ring a bell? Of course not, they were burned down by fanatic christians screaming "science is sorcery, we don't need to think because this fairy tale book tells us every!" You don't even know your own history.>>101271
Bullshit. Check every single reference and author I have stated, there is nothing save for a void of judeo-christian apologists relaundering their crypto-idealism for mass consumption by superstitious, easily scared, already heavily indoctrinated idiots.
Most people take the path of "my religion and it's priests are telling me the truth, so I have to obey them or else I'm going to burn in hell". The opposite are the global elites, all jews themselves, whom have molded you and a couple billion others into perfectly useful idiots. You will defend an obnoxiously antiquated, insidious, dangerous ideology to the death for them, and won't hear a word against it.
seriously anon, read back over your posts ITT, you've mostly just been sperging out this whole time incoherently you've neither proven nor disproven anything. You ignore most of what other anons say and show you but go on to later repeat things they've already disproven. Let's face facts here you're a zogbot who's been brainwashed by zoinist anti-christian propaganda. I'll pray for you to overcome this corruption.
So bringing up evidence that is for our side and against your pre-determined truth of Christ = bad, is spitting on you? You are hopeless. You are the one ruining a civil debate here. And bigoted? Now I know you are a leftist at the very least! Last I checked, we don’t care about that around these parts.
And you really don’t care what fills the void? You really want to go that path? How about Hinduism? That has worked great for India! Oh, how about atheism, which is already being taught in place of Christianity… BY THE JEWS! Is this so hard to understand? They want us dead. They know we can undo all they worked hard for and not the atheists or they would shut that down.
And yes, my meme game is weak, deal with it.
really anon just read back over this one post >>101280
really look it over and think about how you're behaving. It's a rambling mess of unsourced claims and fallacies and it doesn't even really qualify as a response to most of what you're responding to.
>Hitler made numerous mentions of his contention with catholicism
you don't cite this>The bible was written and rewritten by over 600 authors
this doesn't really prove anything of note>You claim to be logical, reasonable, and rational
the only thing he claimed was rational was the debate you're ignoring>I don't care what your murderous superstition is replaced with
this doesn't answer his question>The Enlightenment was the result of mother church being dragged kicking and screaming "science is sorcery!" for over 1,600 years until it realized that it could not change technological progress. Most of the Enlightenment's successes were generated from knowledge kept safe in the Arabic and Asian lands from christian book burners. Library of Alexandria? Library of Philo? The Hellenic Libraries? The Library of Nursia? The Library of Apollonius? The Any of those ring a bell? Of course not, they were burned down by fanatic christians screaming "science is sorcery, we don't need to think because this fairy tale book tells us every!" You don't even know your own history.
this is purely claims without a single citation and none of what you say here even addresses what the anon you're responding to actually brought up about the enlightenment>void of judeo-christian apologists relaundering their crypto-idealism for mass consumption by superstitious, easily scared, already heavily indoctrinated idiots.
this is just one long straw man followed be an even longer strawman:>Most people take the path of "my religion and it's priests are telling me the truth, so I have to obey them or else I'm going to burn in hell". The opposite are the global elites, all jews themselves, whom have molded you and a couple billion others into perfectly useful idiots. You will defend an obnoxiously antiquated, insidious, dangerous ideology to the death for them, and won't hear a word against it.
what the hell are you even going on about here? and where do you get it from?
Saved. Thank you, brother.
please join me in the sunday prayer thread:https://mlpol.net/ub/res/800.html
>Supporting the corrupt Vatican church
>Supporting the marxist Pope
Protestants here wonder why you Catholics support such corruption.
I have problems with this star.
It has a tetragrammaton so it's obviously not for summoning and it seems to be made the way Salomon made his seals..
So this is basically full Jewish power, I do believe the necronomicon should contain a more original approach to seals and occultism in general…
But I don't… I pray and anwser only to God.
Matthew 23:2-3> 2 saying, “The scribes and the Pharisees have taken their seat on the chair of Moses. 3 Therefore, do and observe all things whatsoever they tell you, but do not follow their example. For they preach but they do not practice.
I've explained this a bunch of times here read Matthew 16:13-20, Mark 8:27–30 and Luke 9:18–20 for the Confession of Peter where Jesus Christ himself founds the Roman Catholic Church and promises it will prevail. I'm not supporting corruption I'm just not a heretic like you that would question and doubt the words of our lord and savior Jesus Christ
Very interesting. I will keep this in mind as I pray now.
God is dead, jews killed him.
But we can rebuild him, we have the technology.
We can make him better, stronger, faster.
>>104257>Questioning the Catholic church is the same as questioning Jesus.
i mean there's obviously a distinction between questioning/criticizing it as a catholic compared to going as far as becoming a prodestant heathen
Exactly. I don't like Vatican II, for instance, and I think it did a great deal of harm by relinquishing the Culture War and weakening the moral fabric of the Church, but neither am I a schismatic Sedevacantist who rejects the entire hierarchy as corrupt. That in itself is yet another corruption by Satan to further divide the Church and cast doubt upon all the faithful. Spiritual unity is what's needed in these times, not division.
Protestants are nice, the Catholic church might as well be a bunch of shekel loving kikes. That's how it was in the 1500's, at least.
We don't lack faith in the words of the Lord Jesus Christ. If we be punished for separating from the church in search of a closer following to God rather than get caught up in corruption, so be it. And you may argue that we are also corrupt now, I will give you that hands down as otherwise Osteen wouldn't be such a problem.
However, I will point out to the words of Christ found in Matthew 18:20
For where two or three are gathered together in My name, there am I in the midst of them.
If I am understanding this verse correctly, it means that God doesn't abandon those that meet in His name, no matter what church you go to. Though you may argue we are wrong to separate, God promises to never forsake those that are saved though faith.
I don't want to discourage you in being Catholic. We need good Christians to see the flaws and hopefully reform the parts that are very corrupt so that one day the Protestants and Catholics won't be bitter toward each other.
I hope you can learn to do the same and hope that Protestants will also root out corruptions in our churches and bring us all closer to God. I pray you will have patience with us. Matthew 18:21-22
Then came Peter to Him, and said, Lord, how oft shall my brother sin against me, and I forgive him? till seven times? Jesus saith unto him, I say not unto thee, Until seven times: but, Until seventy times seven.
and as it says in Acts 2:21>And everyone that calls on the name of the Lord shall be saved.
I don't think the protestants will be condemned to hell like non-Christians or anything, but if I had to guess you'll still need to repent in purgatory for losing faith in the church Jesus founded for you. You could avoid this if you'd only repent but it's your decision.
hey /mlpol/ come back to the sunday prayer thread on /üb/ for the Lord's day https://mlpol.net/ub/res/800.html#842
[Last 50 Posts]
As much as i would like to finally get some spirituality into my empty life,i can honestly say that Christianity is giving me the creeps.