Two news caught my eye today and I was curious about what you think about this.
1)
Slobodan Praljak, charged with genocide, told the judges that he does not accept the "despicable" sentence and drinks cyanide in court.
2)
Swede charged with rape allegations after extorting victims to perfom sexual acts in front of a webcam, threatening to relaease pictures of the victims.
Online rape.
What are your thoughts on these news?
Discuss
/mlpol/ - My Little Politics
Archived thread
File (): 65610223D93C5FD962CE7EA372730BDC-239059.png (233.5 KB, 413x500, 1494610866799.png)
>>91894
1. If he died, eh. Who cares. If he didn't died, just give him the death penalty (assuming he is found guilty) because he apparently isn't afraid of death and it's one less clogged jail cell.
2. """Rape""" we already have a term for this, and it's called "blackmail" Fuck stop turning everything into rape.
1. If he died, eh. Who cares. If he didn't died, just give him the death penalty (assuming he is found guilty) because he apparently isn't afraid of death and it's one less clogged jail cell.
2. """Rape""" we already have a term for this, and it's called "blackmail" Fuck stop turning everything into rape.
>>91894
>1
Unironically, guy was innocent. As I recall there was few testimonies of someone else giving/performing orders. Dude had balls to end it his way.
Also,
>eternal clusterfuck of balkans is continuing
When will it ever end?
>2
>implying
>1
Unironically, guy was innocent. As I recall there was few testimonies of someone else giving/performing orders. Dude had balls to end it his way.
Also,
>eternal clusterfuck of balkans is continuing
When will it ever end?
>2
>implying
>>91897
>Unironically, guy was innocent.
They'll never let that happen though.
At least this way he got to die with his honor.
>Unironically, guy was innocent.
They'll never let that happen though.
At least this way he got to die with his honor.
>>91898
None of the news articles even mention his final words before drinking the poison, and they call have "War criminal" in the title.
Dude is dead, at least show a little respect.
None of the news articles even mention his final words before drinking the poison, and they call have "War criminal" in the title.
Dude is dead, at least show a little respect.
File (): 50E753333410B3B07BB4FEC2BD0FD56B-172540.jpg (168.5 KB, 513x600, TracyRemoveKebab.jpeg)
Slobodan Praljak is considered a war criminal because soldiers of his killed Muslims, supposedly on his orders. However, evidence heavily suggests he had nothing to do with this, and it's especially certain considering he had a Muslim wife. Besides, even if he did give orders he's innocent because removing kebab is not a war crime.
I admire Praljak for publicizing and mocking the Hague's politicized form of "justice." May God forgive him for taking his own life.
That's not rape, it's blackmail. Sure, he's a disgusting pervert for demanding sex acts, but if he demanded money instead would be be charged for armed robbery? Sweden goes after not-really-rapists like him and more innocent people like Assange as a way to show they're "progressive" and respecting wamen, even though they turn a blind eye to rapefugees.
Anons, what are your thoughts on this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIUsETJlBP8
When should the crusade on Sweden start?
I admire Praljak for publicizing and mocking the Hague's politicized form of "justice." May God forgive him for taking his own life.
That's not rape, it's blackmail. Sure, he's a disgusting pervert for demanding sex acts, but if he demanded money instead would be be charged for armed robbery? Sweden goes after not-really-rapists like him and more innocent people like Assange as a way to show they're "progressive" and respecting wamen, even though they turn a blind eye to rapefugees.
Anons, what are your thoughts on this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIUsETJlBP8
When should the crusade on Sweden start?
>>91902
>What are your thoughts on this?
Fucking retarded. Jesus christ who the fuck cares? It's an all powerful being beyond comprehension. Who the fuck cares if you mislabel it? You can't comprehend it in the first place, you're going to mislabel it regardless.
>When should the crusade on Sweden start?
5 years ago.
>What are your thoughts on this?
Fucking retarded. Jesus christ who the fuck cares? It's an all powerful being beyond comprehension. Who the fuck cares if you mislabel it? You can't comprehend it in the first place, you're going to mislabel it regardless.
>When should the crusade on Sweden start?
5 years ago.
File (): A179DC008319C8518A92E1F9BE26AB3D-465490.png (454.6 KB, 926x1024, 43756867.png)
>>91902
>>91902
>Anons, what are your thoughts on this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIUsETJlBP8
Honestly? They are some-what right on this.
BUT
It's just another play for "muh gender shit stuff" agenda being pushed into public. God used to be portrayed by prophet Issaiah as female (Ps 22, 10 / Is 42, 14 , 66, 13 , 49, 14-15) God revealed himself as a plant (the burning bush, yo), should we call him "our holy tree" then? Praying to Lord in femine/male form, if done with proper respect is nothing against the faith. Yet, pushing this debate into public is inapropriate and I dare to say, heretical. Also, catechism of the Catholic Church states, that:
>God transcends the human distinction of sex. He is neither a man nor a woman, he is God. It also crosses human fatherhood and motherhood, although it is their beginning and measure: no one is a father like God (239)
>>91902
>Anons, what are your thoughts on this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIUsETJlBP8
Honestly? They are some-what right on this.
BUT
It's just another play for "muh gender shit stuff" agenda being pushed into public. God used to be portrayed by prophet Issaiah as female (Ps 22, 10 / Is 42, 14 , 66, 13 , 49, 14-15) God revealed himself as a plant (the burning bush, yo), should we call him "our holy tree" then? Praying to Lord in femine/male form, if done with proper respect is nothing against the faith. Yet, pushing this debate into public is inapropriate and I dare to say, heretical. Also, catechism of the Catholic Church states, that:
>God transcends the human distinction of sex. He is neither a man nor a woman, he is God. It also crosses human fatherhood and motherhood, although it is their beginning and measure: no one is a father like God (239)
8 replies | 3 files | 1 UUIDs | Archived